On 4/13/11 11:51 AM, "Rolf van der Steen" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I created new logo designs. I started merging the white label / record
>label
>ideas of Scott, Marlon and myself. Some notes:
>
>- I like the font Marlon uses, especially the "A" style. It makes the word
>"RAVE" look really distinctive. So I used a similar but slightly heavier
>font with a more symmetrical cross-bar and adjusted the kerning to give it
>more body and balance.
>- I agree with Hadrians "simplicity is good" statement. So I removed a lot
>of elements from the concept2.
>
>This resulted in:
>http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg
>
>Doing this I realized the symmetry of the "A" and the "V" is a truly
>strong
>style element, and combined it with the 'hole' of the label. I also
>thought
>the 'appstyle' logo still looks too iconic. It needs to be even simpler
>IMO.
>Therefore I've created two variants of a more abstract logo, still based
>on
>the white label idea (and using a black/white color scheme to emphasize
>that). Here they are:
>
>http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg

I really like simplestyle1.  I think it really jumps out at you.  Very
sleek.

>http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle2.jpg
>
>Like to hear your comments.
>
>Rolf
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Scott Wilson
><[email protected]
>> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>> > On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>> >> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> >>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't
>> have
>> >>> the last one on this list.
>> >>
>> >> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>> >>
>> >> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI
>>designer):
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>> >>
>> >> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>> >>
>> >> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>> >> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this
>>list
>> >> too).
>> >
>> > I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2
>>and/or
>> 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
>>
>> I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon -
>>nice!
>>
>> >
>> > Ross
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Ate
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> -Matt
>> >>>
>> >>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >>>> Hash: SHA1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it
>>looks
>> >>>> like
>> >>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree
>>with
>> >>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to
>>go
>> >>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
>> >>>> restart the logo contest?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Marlon
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> >>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> >>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>> >>>>>> decided on
>> >>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and
>>committed
>> to
>> >>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website.
>> Anyone
>> >>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like
>>to
>> see
>> >>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand
>>written
>> >>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
>> >>>>> accurate
>> >>>>> to a white label).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and
>> the
>> >>>>> text were neater (but still script).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ross
>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>> >>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>> >>>>
>> >>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
>> >>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
>> >>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
>> >>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
>> >>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
>> >>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
>> >>>> =Ehw/
>> >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>*HIPPO*
>Europe  €  Amsterdam  Oosteinde 11  €  1017 WT Amsterdam  €  +31 20 522
>4466
>USA       €        Boston  Cambridge 1 Broadway  €  Boston MA 02142  €  +1
>617 500 6160
>USA  € San Francisco  755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor  €  Petaluma CA 94954
>€
>+1 877 414 4776
>www.onehippo.com  €  www.onehippo.org  €  [email protected]
>
>This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
>waive any related rights and obligations.
>Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
>contains by other than an intended recipient is
>unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
>return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.

Reply via email to