To me, it has to do with the phrases "known by" and "resources embodying
that compilation or in reference sources"; these imply that the
compilation as a work in its own right has been around for awhile, and
with that particular title.
YMMV, of course.
Casey
On 3/21/2013 10:08 AM, Kevin M Randall wrote:
Casey Mullin said, regarding 6.2.2.10: "The best practice for when to
apply this condition has not really been established. Certainly,
"Leaves of grass" by Whitman would qualify for most catalogers, but
new collections published for the first time probably wouldn't."
I don't understand why "new collections published for the first time
probably wouldn't." Could you elaborate?
Kevin
Kevin M. Randall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Northwestern University Library
k...@northwestern.edu <mailto:k...@northwestern.edu>
(847) 491-2939
Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!
--
Casey A. Mullin
Head, Data Control Unit
Metadata Department
Stanford University Libraries
650-736-0849
cmul...@stanford.edu
http://www.caseymullin.com
--
"Those who need structured and granular data and the precise retrieval that results
from it to carry out research and scholarship may constitute an elite minority rather
than most of the people of the world (sadly), but that talented and intelligent minority
is an important one for the cultural and technological advancement of humanity. It is
even possible that if we did a better job of providing access to such data, we might
enable the enlargement of that minority."
-Martha Yee
