Hi Konstantin, On Wednesday, December 24, 2003, 12:25:55 PM, you wrote:
KK> The bug is that word "func" is missed, so instead of method definition KK> this code is treated by Rebol as initialization of "close" field with KK> block ["close database"]. What compiler does with second block is not KK> clear to me, I think it was just skipped. There's no compiler, and there's no construct... that's why there's no error too. KK> That is why I said that language should be less error prone. There's no way it could, in this specific case. Setting a word to a block is perfectly legitimate... Regards, Gabriele. -- Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- REBOL Programmer Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila --- SOON: http://www.rebol.it/ -- To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
