Then we simply postulate that the objection is stated, sincerely, to be on the objector's religious beliefs. No race, no mere cosmetics, but a deeply held religious belief on the nature of culture/nation.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Brad Pardee <bp51...@windstream.net> wrote: > In the absence of some factor not listed here, I don't see a religious > freedom issue here. > > > > Brad > > > > *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto: > religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *K Chen > *Sent:* Saturday, February 14, 2015 8:51 PM > *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > *Subject:* RE: The racist prostitute hypothetical > > > > > Brad you said: > > "The problem with comparing a same sex wedding with an interracial wedding > is that the color of a person's skin is no different than the color of a > person's hair or the color of a person's eyes. I don't think anybody would > say that the difference in genders is a strictly cosmetic distinction." > > What about, instead of an interracial wedding, the baker/florist/etc. is > objecting to two whites, one an immigrant from, say, South Africa and the > other a multigenerational American? > > Sent on my mobile device. Please Excuse my brevity and typographic errors. > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. >
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
