Correct. And the vendors in question are likely advertisers in QST whom they don't want to offend.
Chuck ----- Original Message ----- From: "wd8chl" <wd8...@gmail.com> To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr II mods and parts > Chuck Kelsey wrote: >> Yes, it said that in the article. However, the article went on to say >> that some of the ham dealers sold it for duplex service all the time, >> so the writer concluded (somehow) that it was OK to use. Go figure. >> >> Chuck WB2EDV > > Yeah-an ARRL staff writer wrote that? No wonder! > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: AJ To: >> Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 2:17 >> PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr II mods and parts >> >> >> >> >> Didn't the CEO or someone of similar heft at Times Microwave have a >> letter in QST a while back stating the entire LMR series wasn't >> designed for PIM performance, referring potential repeater-use >> customers to their line of low-PIM cables? >> >> No luck on a wildcard search on the ARRL site... Go figure. >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Chuck Kelsey <wb2...@roadrunner.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> At least when it starts causing noise, you'll know where to look. It >> may take a while, or it could happen pretty soon. Like with anything, >> some people have managed to dodge the bullet for quite some time. >> I've seen nothing official that says the problem was "resolved." >> >> Chuck WB2EDV >> > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.124/2599 - Release Date: 01/04/10 03:24:00
