You ll need to create many binary packages : Ubuntu (10.04, 10.10, 11.04, 11.10, 12.04, 12.10, 13.04, 13.10), debian, homebrew, Windows,... There is a huge among of work. Le 9 févr. 2014 16:40, "Daniel Micay" <danielmi...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sa...@exyr.org> wrote: > > On 07/02/2014 00:35, Brian Anderson wrote: > >> > >> We can also attempt to package Rust with various of the most common > >> package managers: homebrew, macports, dpkg, rpm. > > > > > > In my experience with WeasyPrint, this only works if the person > maintaining > > one of these packages uses it personally. (Scratch your own itch.) This > > probably excludes most contributors, as they will have a git clone built > > from source to work with. > > > > Alternatively, this may be viable if these packages can be *entirely* > > automated as part of the normal build/release system, so that they don't > > really need maintainance. But I don't know if that's possible. > > I certainly use my nightly Arch package even though I usually have a > build or two of local branches around. It's very convenient to always > have a working install of master that's less than a day old. > > It's built automatically and in theory doesn't require any attention. > Rust's Makefile does love to break though... > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
