Hi Andrew, Paul,
There is a potential ambiguity, so let me ask to make sure. Paul: in
your use case, the multi partitions are all of the same length (say
n), and are sorted for the *simultaneous* action of the symmetric
group S_n on all partitions, right? E.g. a typical example is:
[ [ 2,1,1,1,1 ]
[ 1,2,1,1,1 ] ]
Andrew: is this what you want to manipulate? Or are you interested in
objects like:
[ [2,1,1,1], [2,1], [3,2,2,2] ]
By the way, Paul: I owe you an apology for not having yet looked at
your code. Basically, I did not need it right away ... I still think
that this would be a very useful and natural addition to Sage. Please
get in touch with Emmanuel to get a mathematic review. And please,
someone, take over the review from me!
Andrew: your proposed change to partitions look very
reasonable. Please go ahead, and choose whatever splitting into
tickets is practical for you. Who volunteers to review Andrew's work?
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
