On Jun 3, 6:22 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery" <nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr> wrote: > Hi Andrew, Paul, > > There is a potential ambiguity, so let me ask to make sure. Paul: in > your use case, the multi partitions are all of the same length (say > n), and are sorted for the *simultaneous* action of the symmetric > group S_n on all partitions, right? E.g. a typical example is: > > [ [ 2,1,1,1,1 ] > [ 1,2,1,1,1 ] ] > > Andrew: is this what you want to manipulate? Or are you interested in > objects like: > > [ [2,1,1,1], [2,1], [3,2,2,2] ]
Hi Nicolas, I just looked at Paul's patch and, of course, you are right. My objects index the conjugacy classes of the wreath product of a finite cyclic group with the symmetric group. I would call Paul's object mulicompositions. Given this ambiguity I should stick with PartitionTuples. Andrew > By the way, Paul: I owe you an apology for not having yet looked at > your code. Basically, I did not need it right away ... I still think > that this would be a very useful and natural addition to Sage. Please > get in touch with Emmanuel to get a mathematic review. And please, > someone, take over the review from me! > > Andrew: your proposed change to partitions look very > reasonable. Please go ahead, and choose whatever splitting into > tickets is practical for you. Who volunteers to review Andrew's work? > > Cheers, > Nicolas > -- > Nicolas M. Thi�ry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
