Would it be better to hold a vote to decide on the ways to deal with this issue, rather than on this particular PR? Namely, the alternatives are
1) do nothing 2) bring AA in line with Python 3) bring RR in line with AA Arguments against 2) are that it's mathematically weird, and that other projects such as numpy are happy with their number types not blindly mimicking the choice made by Python. My vote is for 3), as 1) leaves the inconsistency between AA and RR unresolved. Dima On Tuesday, September 3, 2024 at 3:19:16 AM UTC+1 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > The PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38362 is for adding > deprecation warning to the use of AA(x)^(1/n) to get the real root. > The PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38564 will change the > behavior of AA(x)^(1/n) after one year deprecation period. > Adding P(x).pow(m/n) = AA(x).nth_root(n)**m will be provided for > fractional power computation in the parent P (including AA). > > Voting for this change is going on > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38362. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/01b4706b-22a1-429f-852a-c2fb52cb484bn%40googlegroups.com.
