Re: How to define right cisco hardware and software (IOS) [7:75223]
Dynamic Configuration Tool: http://www.cisco.com/appcontent/apollo/configureHomeGuest.html Mark CCIE R&S, Security Lab Technician GigaVelocity.com - Original Message - From: "Hinwoto" To: Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 9:03 PM Subject: How to define right cisco hardware and software (IOS) [7:75220] > dear all, > > guys,.. > Could anyone give advise about how to define the right > - cisco hardware (module, chassis, memory, NPE etc) > - cisco software (IOS type etc) > > thanks and looking forward to your advise guys. > hin > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75223&t=75223 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Basic IP CEF question (again) [7:75161]
Hi Zsombor, what do you mean?? Why the router has the broadcast IP in "receive" mode? I would like to know more about this ;) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75224&t=75161 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
help [7:75225]
help Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75225&t=75225 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
ciscoview-urgent [7:75227]
Dear All, In my network MPLS VPN is there and the cisco devices having 7513,6509 and GSR. but in topology i am not getting 6509 which is having OSM-4ge-wan card and i can't detect the module in topology services. i have installed related pathches like CLiparaser, catios6000, switchaddlets etc...but still getting problem ? is coming in topology services. please guide me urgently Thanks & Regards, milind __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75227&t=75227 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: home lab equipment [7:75115]
I stopped buying long ago except isdn pbx, "basics" on routers at home, and started renting a few low budget ATM/VOICE etc. labs online. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Dave Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 9 september 2003 22:31 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: home lab equipment [7:75115] Group, I'm planning on purchasing my final addition to my R&S home lab sometime this month. I'm having a hard time deciding if I should add another 3550 (I have one already) or if I should pick up a Lightstream 1010 with two 4500s that have an OC3 MM interface. ATM for the 3600s is way too expensive for me. Any suggestions would be appreciated. (Sorry if this message is a dub) -dave **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75226&t=75115 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Cisc SAFE Exam [7:75200]
Saw some on the group a few weeks ago. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Fred Wittenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2003 20:15 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Cisc SAFE Exam [7:75200] Hello all, I'm planning on taking the SAFE exam to wrap up my CCSP soon...can anyone that has passed/taken this offer what they used as study guides?? TIA, FW **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75228&t=75200 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
New Cisco Catalyst QoS book [7:75229]
Hi, I was wondering whether it's worth reading the new Cisco Catalyst QoS IOS book whilst revising for the CCIE theory or even perhaps the practical exams. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75229&t=75229 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Upgrading ROMMON on 2948G [7:75179]
CCO customer? login http://ftp.cisco.com/cisco/lan/catalyst/4000/cat4000-releasenote.8-1-2.pdf 2 Release Notes for Catalyst 4500 Series Software Release 8.x OL-4502-02 ROMMON Requirements If the Boot ROM (ROMMON) loaded onto your switch is version 4.5(1) or earlier, you need to upgrade the ROMMON to at least version 5.4(1) in order to run software release 8.1 or later. Upgrading the ROMMON Follow these guidelines to upgrade the ROMMON on your switch: 3 Release Notes for Catalyst 4500 Series Software Release 8.x OL-4502-02 System Requirements Caution To avoid actions that might make your system unbootable, read this entire section before starting the upgrade. You can do this procedure entirely over a Telnet connection, but if something fails, you will need to have access to the console serial port. If done improperly, the system can become unbootable. You will then have to return it to Cisco for repair. This section describes an upgrade to ROMMON version 6.4(1). The same procedure applies to other ROMMON versions, but you will have to substitute appropriate version numbers in the upgrade image names. Step 1 Download the promupgrade program from Cisco.com and place it on a TFTP server in a directory that is accessible from the switch to be upgraded. The promupgrade programs are available at the same location on Cisco.com where you download Catalyst 4500 series system images. To upgrade to ROMMON version 6.1(4), download the cat4000-promupgrade.6-1-4.bin file. Step 2 In privileged mode on your switch, use the show version command to verify the ROMMON version loaded on the switch. The ROMMON version number is listed as the System Bootstrap Version. For example, in the following output, the system is running ROMMON version 6.1(2): Console> (enable) show version WS-C4003 Software, Version NmpSW:5.5(8) Copyright (c) 1995-2001 by Cisco Systems, Inc. NMP S/W compiled on May 24 2001, 21:12:09 GSP S/W compiled on May 24 2001, 18:39:50 System Bootstrap Version:6.1(2) Hardware Version:1.0 Model:WS-C4003 Serial #:x **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: BGP Table and SNMP [7:75016]
Did you read trough the http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feat ure_guide09186a0080087c60.html 12.0 BGP Received Routes MIB http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feat ure_guide09186a0080110bbc.html 12.2T BGP 4 MIB Support for per-Peer Received Routes Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Alejandro Acosta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 9 september 2003 3:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: BGP Table and SNMP [7:75016] Hi all, I wonder if any of you have succesfully retrieved the BGP table from a Cisco router using SNMP?. I read a lot of documents and tried a lot of MIBs/OID without any success. I used the MIB navigation tool at the Cisco TAC but I did not find something really useful. I only could read the peerings, uptime of the BGP session and few more thing. By the moment I think it should be done using snmpwalk, am I right? FYI, I do have the full routing table in one of my routers (IOS 12.2.6) Any help will be appreciated. Thank Alejandro Acosta **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75232&t=75016 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: route add [7:75024]
Easy did a zillion times for the "sysadmins". IE settings hack. trough a .reg file in the login script. (per user or group dep on your directory/kix) so do NOT use proxy for this and this anbd this webserver Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Steiven Poh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 9 september 2003 6:52 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: route add [7:75024] Dear All, I have a very stupit quesrtion here. How am i by pass the proxy and route direct to the router. Pls comment !! Below is my diagram. 169.168.4.2/16 (my pc) -> router (192.168.161.254/16)-->Leased Line 64k-->router (192.167.161.254/16)>Proxy (192.167.3.34/16)--->Internet router (192.167.3.35/16) My pc route print : Active Routes: Network Address Netmask Gateway AddressInterface Metric 0.0.0.00.0.0.0 192.167.161.254 192.168.4.2 1 0.0.0.00.0.0.0 192.168.161.254 192.168.4.2 1 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0127.0.0.1127.0.0.1 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.4.2 192.168.4.2 1 192.168.4.2 255.255.255.255127.0.0.1127.0.0.1 1 192.168.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.4.2 192.168.4.2 1 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.4.2 192.168.4.2 1 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.4.2 0.0.0.0 1 This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75234&t=75024 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: router CPU utilization on access lists? [7:75002]
So maybe permit and route to null0 in some cases? Then no unreachables are generated because there is a "route"? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Marty Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 9 september 2003 20:29 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: router CPU utilization on access lists? [7:75002] Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > Yes, that's true indeed that access lists don't cause process switching > anymore, so wouldn't show up in IP Input. > Two exceptions that I failed to mention are logging and the side effect of a deny. By default, a deny causes the generation of an ICMP admin. prohibited unreachable sent to the source of the blcoked packet. Since packets cannot be created in interrupt mode, process context is required. But these are rate limited to two/second by default as self protection. Plus normal traffic shouldn't result in very many denies. But you can inhibit this entirely by configuring "no ip unreachables" on an interface. If the matching ACE has the "log" keyword, then process context is required to create the log message and perform normal logging. This too is rate-limited. > Thanks for everyone's advice. It sounds like Marty has the right approach. > Although access lists aren't process switched, they are generally fast > switched unless the router supports some other feature (like silicon > switching) or some fancy configuration like CEF or NetFlow? > > So, the thing to look for is a high utilization caused by interrupts (the > number after the slash). > > I can't safely turn them off and test, so I think I will try to simulate the > network and traffic in a lab to test my theory that they are an issue. > > It's a 2621 router with lots of entries in the access lists that are > applied. I think it's time to offload a lot of the policy represented by the > lists to a PIX firewall. > You can "tune" the lists by letting it run for a while and then noting the match counts (show access-list). Within each grouping of permit entries, you can reorder the statements to reduce the number of entries that must be compared to reach a match. If the ACL processing is as efficient as possible but is really impacting CPU utilization, then you could enable the turbo ACL feature (access-list compiled). Unfortunately, that's still only available on higher-end platforms, from 3700s on up. > Here's a good URL on troubleshooting high CPU util, by the way: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/highcpu.html > > Thanks > > Priscilla > - Marty **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75233&t=75002 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Difference between Cisco VPN and PIX Firewall [7:75235]
Hello all Can I know what is the Cisco PIX and that of a Cisco VPN 3000 in terms of performance? As I am planning to implement VPN with either VPN Concentrator or PIX,however I was told that if you implement only VPN Concentrator instead of PIX ,then you may get VPN connectivity but you will not be able to implement the filtering functionalities which are required .In case of PIX I may get both VPN as well as as filtering of unwanted traffic thereby changes of hacking sessions are less. Is this true. I am confised .Kindly help me. Also which one should consider to be the best scenario for implementation ? I am giving the 3 scenario below.If there is any scenario better than this pls get me know ewith the pros and cons of that one.Also equest you to know me the pros and cons of this scenarios also. aThnaks in advance. Scenario I Scenario II Scenario InternetInternet Internet ||| VPN Concentrator Firewall Firewall--VPN || | Concntrtr || | | LAN VPNLAN _| Concentrator Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online. Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75235&t=75235 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
question? [7:75237]
got your email address from the web: do you answer cisco related questions by any chance: know any one who is willing to? - Yahoo! Search - Looking for more? Try the new Yahoo! Search Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75237&t=75237 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem [7:75238]
I have a customer that has a small office with a Cisco 56K Frame router. They are running Nat. Now when I plug in the frame side the ethernet side gets constant request for translation then it gets to the point where you can no longer even ping the ethernet side. If I remove the RG45 cable from the frame side. No problem the request stop and I can ping my ethernet side of the router fine with 10ml sec responses all day. The users office is down because he can not get out to the web. I've checked for viruses and everything seems fine. Does anyone have any ideas? This one is driving me crazy. The ISP says that my router is bad, but I doubt it. It started all of a sudden after working fine for 2 years. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75238&t=75238 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: help [7:75225]
problem? Paul Borghese wrote: > help > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75240&t=75225 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Solutions for the Solie Labs - ?? [7:75239]
Hello,Does any one if there is a way to get the solutions for the Solie Labs from CCIE PS Vol. I?Thank you. Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75239&t=75239 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Difference between Cisco VPN and PIX Firewall [7:75235]
Stnadard answer: it depends. Followed immediately by the standard question: what problem are you trying to solve? The VPN Concentrator does not firewall or filter; it is a specialized tunnel termination device. You may (emphasis on may) need to use it when you are terminating more than about 20 tunnels. That depends on how active the tunnels are and what else your firewall is doing -- how much other work must it do filtering how much other traffic? The Concentrator does offer AES and DH Group 7 (the latter is useful if the other end of the tunnel is a client which can support ECC, but not many can). You need a firewall between you and the Internet. Have a look at the SMR SAFE Blueprint, here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns110/ns170/ns171/ns128/networking_solutions_white_paper09186a008009c8a0.shtml If you do decide to use a Concentrator, people may differ, but I recommend terminating your tunnels outside the firewall. If you don't, the firewall must either work at the traffic to inspect it properly (which in fact makes it work even harder tore-encrypt, etc. to send it to the Concentrator) or you poke a big hole in the firewall by accepting traffic that "looks like" it ought to be a part of the tunnel. If your LAN receives public traffic (is there a public-facing server, any kind of mini-DMZ?), then you will want a switch to send tunnel traffic tothe Concentrator and all other traffic to the firewall. Looks sort of like this: Concentrator / \ Internet---switch/\firewall---LAN HTH Annlee Mr piyush shah wrote: > Hello all > Can I know what is the Cisco PIX and that of a Cisco > VPN 3000 in terms of performance? > As I am planning to implement VPN with either VPN > Concentrator or PIX,however I was told that if you > implement only VPN Concentrator instead of PIX ,then > you may get VPN connectivity but you will not be able > to implement the filtering functionalities which are > required .In case of PIX I may get both VPN as well as > as filtering of unwanted traffic thereby changes of > hacking sessions are less. > Is this true. > I am confised .Kindly help me. > Also which one should consider to be the best scenario > for implementation ? > I am giving the 3 scenario below.If there is any > scenario better than this pls get me know ewith the > pros and cons of that one.Also equest you to know me > the pros and cons of this scenarios also. > aThnaks in advance. > > Scenario I Scenario II Scenario > > > InternetInternet Internet >||| > > > > VPN Concentrator Firewall Firewall--VPN >|| | Concntrtr >|| | | > LAN VPNLAN _| >Concentrator > > > > > > Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online. > Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75241&t=75235 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Solutions for the Solie Labs - ?? [7:75239]
If you mean the labs in the back of the book, you can download the solutions at www.ciscopress.com. Look up the book then under "More Information", click on "downloads". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75242&t=75239 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Difference between Cisco VPN and PIX Firewall [7:75235]
Scenario III is probably the most recommended. It is incorrect to say that the VPN Concentrator does not have filtering capabilities. It generally only allows traffic in its public interface necessary for VPN connections, so it is not any more inherently insecure as a PIX. It does not have all of the capabilities of the PIX however, so if you need a true firewall I'd go with a firewall (not necessarily a PIX, I personally think they suck, go with a Check Point). Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Mr piyush shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Difference between Cisco VPN and PIX Firewall [7:75235] Hello all Can I know what is the Cisco PIX and that of a Cisco VPN 3000 in terms of performance? As I am planning to implement VPN with either VPN Concentrator or PIX,however I was told that if you implement only VPN Concentrator instead of PIX ,then you may get VPN connectivity but you will not be able to implement the filtering functionalities which are required .In case of PIX I may get both VPN as well as as filtering of unwanted traffic thereby changes of hacking sessions are less. Is this true. I am confised .Kindly help me. Also which one should consider to be the best scenario for implementation ? I am giving the 3 scenario below.If there is any scenario better than this pls get me know ewith the pros and cons of that one.Also equest you to know me the pros and cons of this scenarios also. aThnaks in advance. Scenario I Scenario II Scenario InternetInternet Internet ||| VPN Concentrator Firewall Firewall--VPN || | Concntrtr || | | LAN VPNLAN _| Concentrator Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online. Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75244&t=75235 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227]
If you happen to be running PIM Sparse-Dense mode with auto-RP and "duplicate" loopback IP addresses then you need a special patch for CiscoWorks in order for it to properly discover the 6509's... This probably effects anything that has "duplicate" loopback IP addresses. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] Dear All, In my network MPLS VPN is there and the cisco devices having 7513,6509 and GSR. but in topology i am not getting 6509 which is having OSM-4ge-wan card and i can't detect the module in topology services. i have installed related pathches like CLiparaser, catios6000, switchaddlets etc...but still getting problem ? is coming in topology services. please guide me urgently Thanks & Regards, milind __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75243&t=75227 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: DLSW+ filter [7:75192]
This is from Solie's book: The name in Netbios lists is compared with the source name field for Netbios commands 00 and 01 an is comparted with the destination name field for Netbios commands 08, 0A and 0E (datagram, name-query, name recognized). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75245&t=75192 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: question? [7:75237]
Yes I do and how can I contribute to your good cause?:) Thank you Ollie AT&T Common Backbone 866-397-7309 Opt 1 -Original Message- From: Accsystest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: question? [7:75237] got your email address from the web: do you answer cisco related questions by any chance: know any one who is willing to? - Yahoo! Search - Looking for more? Try the new Yahoo! Search **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75246&t=75237 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808]
Maybe also sniffer (distributed), nice reports, ready for excel or the beamer (CEO-ready.. ;-)) Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 4 september 2003 19:17 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808] I would like recommendations on distributed network benchmarking and performance analysis systems. I would like to place sensors/collectors at various points on the network to collect data on and give detailed reports on items like, but not limited to: Packet loss Latency Jitter Throughput If someone could recommend some companies I would appreciate it. Guy H. Lupi **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75248&t=74808 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: help [7:75225]
Oops! I am moving the mailing list users to a new server and was testing the new server. I inadvertently sent one of the test messages to the active list. At 3:00 AM when stuff is not working, yelling "help" does not seem like a bad idea :-). By the way, the move should be done by this afternoon. Unless I get tied up with something else, you will receive a welcome message (those that read via e-mail) describing the new server. Take care, Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of annlee Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: help [7:75225] problem? Paul Borghese wrote: > help > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75249&t=75225 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: NAT and SAP [7:74982]
Different approach: Howmany clients? Static Nat on the router the other way around? Give the server a route pointer to the nat router for the client. You even can choose to give the client a global ip to connect to the server with, like a mail server for example. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 8 september 2003 18:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: NAT and SAP [7:74982] When a SAP client tries to connect to a SAP server through a router with NAT enabled there is a problem: the SAP server sends an IP embedded on the payload of the packet, and the NAT router do not translate it. Any suggestion? **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75247&t=74982 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
642-811 [7:75252]
Hello people.. I have at home Cisco Press Certification Library for 640-50* Exams. I did not present the Exam on the dates because political problems in my country. Now Cisco has change the exam content and this book in my opinion seems not to fit very well. I am willing to change all this PDF with the 642-811 PDF. If you like the idea write me a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards Victor. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75252&t=75252 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: OSPF demand-circuit does not work [7:74954]
It will say multicast. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Devrim Yener KUCUK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 8 september 2003 16:38 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: OSPF demand-circuit does not work [7:74954] what do you see when you do "sh dialer" on the calling router, as a dial reason? or debug dialer, debug isdn q931 will be telling you regards De - Original Message - From: "Lesly Verdier" To: Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:25 PM Subject: OSPF demand-circuit does not work [7:74954] > Hello All, > > I've configured "ip ospf demand-circuit" on an ISDN connection and this > statement is supposed to supress the calls initiated by the Hello Packets. > Still my router keeps on dialing. > > Does anybody know what the reason might be? > > Thanks, > > Lesly Verdier > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75250&t=74954 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: ISDN Switch - Teleos [7:39556]
Does anybody have a link to the NMC software that i have heard mentioned or have it available thru ftp ?? Cheers Mark Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75251&t=39556 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Basic IP CEF question (again) [7:75161]
Broadcast means everybody receives it. Curious wrote: > > Hi Zsombor, what do you mean?? Why the router has the broadcast > IP in > "receive" mode? > I would like to know more about this ;) > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75253&t=75161 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this probl [7:75238]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have a customer that has a small office with a Cisco 56K > Frame router. They > are running Nat. Now when I plug in the frame side the ethernet > side gets > constant request for translation then it gets to the point > where you can no > longer even ping the ethernet side. If I remove the RG45 cable > from the frame side. > No problem the request stop and I can ping my ethernet side of > the router > fine with 10ml sec responses all day. The users office is down > because he can not > get out to the web. I've checked for viruses and everything > seems fine. Does > anyone have any ideas? This one is driving me crazy. The ISP > says that my > router is bad, but I doubt it. It started all of a sudden after > working fine for 2 > years. Please send us your config and the output of various show commands like show interface, show processes cpu, etc. The show tech-support command displays the results of many commands so is probably the best one to use. If you think it's a NAT problem, some show commands for NAT include: show ip nat statistics show ip nat translations You say the problem just started all of a sudden? The Internet has been pretty shaky lately. You may be getting pinged constantly, for example. Are you stopping those before you translate them? Do you have a firewall? Is the router acting as a firewall? How is it configured? Please send us more data to help you. Thanks. Priscilla > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75256&t=75238 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
L2TP v3 Question [7:75255]
Trying to do a lab that connects two ethernet lans together via L2TP v3. Cisco has diddly for config examples. Does anyone have any that work? Here is what I have so far. (shown below) Topology: pc1--lan1---fa0/0-router1-fa5/0--tunnel-fa5/0-router2-fa0/0---lan2-- pc2 Configs: * router1 * ip cef int lo0 ip addr 192.168.254.2 255.255.255.0 l2tp-class l2tp-defaults retransmit initial retries 30 cookie size 8 pseudowire-class ether-pw encapsulation l2tpv3 protocol none ip local interface Loopback0 interface FastEthernet 0/0 xconnect 192.168.1.2 123 encapsulation l2tpv3 manual pw-class ether-pw l2tp id 222 111 l2tp cookie local 4 54321 l2tp cookie remote 4 12345 l2tp hello l2tp-defaults * router2 * ip cef int lo0 ip addr 192.168.254.3 255.255.255.0 l2tp-class l2tp-defaults retransmit initial retries 30 cookie size 8 pseudowire-class ether-pw encapsulation l2tpv3 protocol none ip local interface Loopback0 interface Ethernet 2/0 xconnect 192.168.1.1 123 encapsulation l2tpv3 manual pw-class ether-pw l2tp id 111 222 l2tp cookie local 4 12345 l2tp cookie remote 4 54321 l2tp hello l2tp-defaults Thanks, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75255&t=75255 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808]
VitalNet from Lucent Technologies can use Cisco SAA, so in a way it's distributed polling. Any (recent) IOS device would become a sensor/collector. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808] Maybe also sniffer (distributed), nice reports, ready for excel or the beamer (CEO-ready.. ;-)) Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 4 september 2003 19:17 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808] I would like recommendations on distributed network benchmarking and performance analysis systems. I would like to place sensors/collectors at various points on the network to collect data on and give detailed reports on items like, but not limited to: Packet loss Latency Jitter Throughput If someone could recommend some companies I would appreciate it. Guy H. Lupi **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75254&t=74808 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
question on acl [7:75258]
Hi, How do you write an ext acl to block telnet access from even addresses in subnet 192.168.2.0/24 (i.e, .2, .4, .6 etc) to server 192.168.1.254? thks, yongwee Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75258&t=75258 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
question on acl [7:75257]
Hi, How do you write an ext acl to block telnet access from even addresses in subnet 192.168.2.0/24 (i.e, .2, .4, .6 etc) to server 192.168.1.254? rgds, yongwee Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75257&t=75257 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
BSCI 640-901 [7:75259]
Hello people, I am sitting the exam on next Monday (22nd September). Has anyone taken the exam recently? I just want to know what the passing score is. Thank you. Cheers, Kenan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75259&t=75259 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: question on acl [7:75258]
Here is an example of a named ACL to Block Specific even HOST sources to destination port 23 to the address you specified. You can use: ip access-list extended BLOCK_TELNET_EVEN deny tcp 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.254 host 192.168.1.254 eq telnet permit ip any any Just practice and play with the BITS in the MASK.. You can achieve this type of scenario in 1 statment.. -Sal Yong Wee wrote: > > Hi, >How do you write an ext acl to block telnet access from even > addresses in > subnet 192.168.2.0/24 (i.e, .2, .4, .6 etc) to server > 192.168.1.254? > > thks, > yongwee > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75260&t=75258 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
What am I missing? HELP [7:75265]
All- I have a CBOS IOS on a CISCO Router ( 600 series). I am trying to make this router a filter router. When I implement the rules below, nothing comes across. I have checked the documentation, but still can't find the solution. Does anybody have any ideas? Your help is well appreciated.. set filter 0 on allow incoming eth0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol tcp set filter 1 on allow incoming eth0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol udp set filter 2 on allow incoming eth0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol icmp set filter 3 on allow outgoing all 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol tcp set filter 4 on allow outgoing all 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol icmp set filter 5 on allow outgoing all 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol udp set filter 6 on allow incoming wan0-0 192.18.42.16 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol tcp srcport 1024-65535 destport 23 set filter 7 on allow incoming wan0-0 192.18.42.16 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol tcp srcport 1024-65535 destport 20 set filter 8 on allow incoming wan0-0 192.18.42.16 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol icmp set filter 9 on allow incoming wan0-0 192.18.42.17 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol tcp srcport 1024-65535 destport 23 set filter 10 on allow incoming wan0-0 192.18.42.17 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol tcp srcport 1024-65535 destport 20 set filter 11 on allow incoming wan0-0 192.18.42.17 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 protocol icmp SRS Level 2 SRS Implementation Team Cell phone# 720-840-4887 SUN PH# 303-272-2661 Virtual Office# 303-604-0037 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75265&t=75265 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem [7:75263]
I'll bet the trouble started when the Nachi worm started spreading. It uses pings to find hosts to infect. See the following to see what happens to NAT when pinged from the outside. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/4.html > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem > [7:75238] > > > I have a customer that has a small office with a Cisco 56K > Frame router. > They > are running Nat. Now when I plug in the frame side the > ethernet side gets > constant request for translation then it gets to the point > where you can no > longer even ping the ethernet side. If I remove the RG45 > cable from the > frame side. > No problem the request stop and I can ping my ethernet side > of the router > fine with 10ml sec responses all day. The users office is > down because he > can not > get out to the web. I've checked for viruses and everything > seems fine. Does > anyone have any ideas? This one is driving me crazy. The ISP > says that my > router is bad, but I doubt it. It started all of a sudden > after working fine > for 2 > years. > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75263&t=75263 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: question on acl [7:75257]
Yongwee, ! ! Deny even numbers but permit everything else ! access-list 101 deny tcp 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.254 host 192.168.1.254 eq telnet access-list 101 permit any any ! implicit deny all here ! ! or perhaps more efficiently ! ! ! Permit odd numbers only ! access-list 101 permit tcp 192.168.2.1 0.0.0.254 host 192.168.1.254 eq telnet ! implicit deny all here ! These answers are based on the fact that an even number in binary will have a least significant digit of 0 in the octet while an odd number will have a 1. Thus the 0.0.0.254 mask isolates the least significant digit for a match against either a 1 or a zero. FWIW, Bob ""Yong Wee"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, >How do you write an ext acl to block telnet access from even addresses in > subnet 192.168.2.0/24 (i.e, .2, .4, .6 etc) to server 192.168.1.254? > > rgds, > yongwee > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75262&t=75257 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227]
Communications problem. I don't understand what you are asking. Try using more words. Be verbose. I may be able to understand then... As far as I can tell: You are not having any problems discovering the 6509. It is in the topology. In your original messages, you said you were NOT getting the 6509 in the topology. See my confusion? Beyond that, I don't know what your problem is, so I can't suggest a solution. Just an off-the-wall guess, you probably need to load up the latest device information file (Incremental Device thingy) in CiscoWorks to recognize a particular module that may have been released recently... Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:45 PM To: Reimer, Fred Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] hi reimer, Thanks for ur reply but not getting wht u want to say. coz i told u i install , CATIOS6000 , Entity , Switchaddlet, CLIparser still i can't see i mean it is coming intopology but with ? . so pls suggest me Thanks & Regards, Milind Tare --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > If you happen to be running PIM Sparse-Dense mode > with auto-RP and > "duplicate" loopback IP addresses then you need a > special patch for > CiscoWorks in order for it to properly discover the > 6509's... This probably > effects anything that has "duplicate" loopback IP > addresses. > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, > Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: > 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or > proprietary information which > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for > the named recipient(s). > If an addressing or transmission error has > misdirected the email, please > notify the author by replying to this message. If > you are not the named > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, > distribute, copy, print > or rely on this email, and should immediately delete > it from your computer. > > > -Original Message- > From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] > > Dear All, > > > In my network MPLS VPN is there and the cisco > devices having 7513,6509 and GSR. but in topology i > am > not getting 6509 which is having OSM-4ge-wan card > and > i can't detect the module in topology services. > i have installed related pathches like CLiparaser, > catios6000, switchaddlets etc...but still getting > problem ? is coming in topology services. > > please guide me urgently > > Thanks & Regards, > milind > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site > design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the > GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75269&t=75227 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: L2TP v3 Question [7:75255]
I just had mine working. Cola#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 2615 bytes ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption no service single-slot-reload-enable ! hostname Cola ! redundancy no keepalive-enable mode hsa enable secret 5 $1$4gPI$wcQKNzXJpTT3ibtsj.nLY0 ! ip subnet-zero ip cef distributed ip host jazz 192.168.100.53 mpls ldp logging neighbor-changes no mpls traffic-eng auto-bw timers frequency 0 l2tp-class mc_l2tp_contr hello 30 password 0 secret cookie size 8 ! pseudowire-class mc_l2tp_path encapsulation l2tpv3 protocol l2tpv3 mc_l2tp_contr ip local interface Loopback3 ip pmtu ip dfbit set ip tos reflect ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 30.30.30.1 255.255.255.255 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Loopback3 ip address 192.168.100.43 255.255.255.255 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Loopback4 ip address 50.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface FastEthernet3/0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Ethernet3/1/0 ip address 200.100.100.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Ethernet3/1/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Ethernet3/1/2 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Ethernet3/1/3 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Ethernet3/1/4 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Ethernet3/1/5 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Ethernet3/1/6 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Ethernet3/1/7 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface FastEthernet9/0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast full-duplex ! interface FastEthernet9/0/0.1 encapsulation dot1Q 101 ip address 13.0.1.1 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface FastEthernet9/0/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast full-duplex ! interface FastEthernet9/0/1.1 encapsulation dot1Q 101 no ip directed-broadcast no cdp enable xconnect 192.168.100.53 101 pw-class mc_l2tp_path ! interface FastEthernet9/1/0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast media-type MII full-duplex ! router bgp 10 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 50.0.0.0 redistribute connected neighbor 20.20.20.1 remote-as 10 neighbor 20.20.20.1 update-source Loopback0 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 10.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2 ip route 20.20.20.1 255.255.255.255 13.0.1.2 ip route 192.168.100.53 255.255.255.255 10.1.1.2 ! ! ! ! alias exec ff show ip int brief ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end router2# Building configuration... Current configuration : 3888 bytes ! version 12.0 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption no service single-slot-reload-enable ! hostname blabla2 ! redundancy no keepalive-enable mode hsa enable secret 5 $1$j7en$FoJXnn8QFW18jod4ncYzi. ! ip subnet-zero ip cef distributed ip host cola 192.168.100.43 no mpls ldp logging neighbor-changes no mpls traffic-eng auto-bw timers frequency 0 l2tp-class mc_l2tp_contr hello 30 password 0 secret cookie size 8 ! pseudowire-class mc_l2tp_path encapsulation l2tpv3 protocol l2tpv3 mc_l2tp_contr ip local interface Loopback3 ip pmtu ip dfbit set ip tos reflect ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 20.20.20.1 255.255.255.255 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Loopback3 ip address 192.168.100.53 255.255.255.255 no ip directed-broadcast ! ! interface FastEthernet5/1/0 ip address 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache distributed full-duplex ! interface FastEthernet8/1/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache full-duplex ! interface FastEthernet8/1/0.1 encapsulation dot1Q 101 ip address 13.0.1.2 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ! interface FastEthernet8/1/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache full-duplex ! interface FastEthernet8/1/1.1 encapsulation dot1Q 101 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache no cdp enable xconnect 192.168.100.43 101 pw-class mc_l2tp_path ! ! ip classless ip route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.2.1 ip route 192.168.100.43 255.255.255.255 10.2.2.1 ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end Cisco has a messed up way of implementing the L2TPv3 tunnels like this. Basically you looped two FE ports together. Pick 1 port for your layer 3 routing and the other port to cross connect your layer two tunnels. The vlan ID for the two FE ports must match. The tunnels reference the loopback of the endpoint router. Hope this helps. -Doan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75266&t=75255
RE: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808]
For the SAAgents embedded in the IOS, use the IPM (Internetwork Performance Monitor) software. It comes as part of the CiscoWorks package. I don't know if you can buy it as a standalone package. It includes a plug-in to CiscoWorks and a client to install on the pc. It's much easier to configure and view statistics through the GUI. Michelle Loechel -Original Message- From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808] VitalNet from Lucent Technologies can use Cisco SAA, so in a way it's distributed polling. Any (recent) IOS device would become a sensor/collector. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808] Maybe also sniffer (distributed), nice reports, ready for excel or the beamer (CEO-ready.. ;-)) Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 4 september 2003 19:17 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808] I would like recommendations on distributed network benchmarking and performance analysis systems. I would like to place sensors/collectors at various points on the network to collect data on and give detailed reports on items like, but not limited to: Packet loss Latency Jitter Throughput If someone could recommend some companies I would appreciate it. Guy H. Lupi **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75264&t=74808 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227]
hi reimer, Thanks for ur reply but not getting wht u want to say. coz i told u i install , CATIOS6000 , Entity , Switchaddlet, CLIparser still i can't see i mean it is coming intopology but with ? . so pls suggest me Thanks & Regards, Milind Tare --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > If you happen to be running PIM Sparse-Dense mode > with auto-RP and > "duplicate" loopback IP addresses then you need a > special patch for > CiscoWorks in order for it to properly discover the > 6509's... This probably > effects anything that has "duplicate" loopback IP > addresses. > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, > Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: > 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or > proprietary information which > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for > the named recipient(s). > If an addressing or transmission error has > misdirected the email, please > notify the author by replying to this message. If > you are not the named > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, > distribute, copy, print > or rely on this email, and should immediately delete > it from your computer. > > > -Original Message- > From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] > > Dear All, > > > In my network MPLS VPN is there and the cisco > devices having 7513,6509 and GSR. but in topology i > am > not getting 6509 which is having OSM-4ge-wan card > and > i can't detect the module in topology services. > i have installed related pathches like CLiparaser, > catios6000, switchaddlets etc...but still getting > problem ? is coming in topology services. > > please guide me urgently > > Thanks & Regards, > milind > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site > design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the > GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75267&t=75227 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: question on acl [7:75257]
As multiple single entries - you can not summarize these... A better way is to have all the specific users that must be denied to be in a summarizable subnet -Original Message- From: Yong Wee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 September 2003 17:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: question on acl [7:75257] Hi, How do you write an ext acl to block telnet access from even addresses in subnet 192.168.2.0/24 (i.e, .2, .4, .6 etc) to server 192.168.1.254? rgds, yongwee **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75268&t=75257 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: {Spam?} question on acl [7:75258]
You would have to do each host individually as: access-list 110 deny tcp host 192.168.2.2 host 192.168.1.254 eq 23 You cannot choose only even addresses with any kind of command. Atleast not that I am aware of. -Original Message- From: Yong Wee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: {Spam?} question on acl [7:75258] Hi, How do you write an ext acl to block telnet access from even addresses in subnet 192.168.2.0/24 (i.e, .2, .4, .6 etc) to server 192.168.1.254? thks, yongwee **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75270&t=75258 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227]
hi reimer, Thanks for ur reply, and extremely sorry for mis communication. i will explain u my porblem. I install ciscoworks. I have GSR,7513,6509,3512 in my network. but in topology view i can see 7513,3512,and GSR. I install CATIOS6000,Switchaddlets,Entity, CLIparser. about 6509 the box is coming in Topology but "?" is coming on that box. Thanks & Regards, Milind Tare --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > Communications problem. I don't understand what you > are asking. Try using > more words. Be verbose. I may be able to > understand then... > > As far as I can tell: > You are not having any problems discovering the > 6509. It is in the > topology. In your original messages, you said you > were NOT getting the 6509 > in the topology. See my confusion? > > Beyond that, I don't know what your problem is, so I > can't suggest a > solution. > > Just an off-the-wall guess, you probably need to > load up the latest device > information file (Incremental Device thingy) in > CiscoWorks to recognize a > particular module that may have been released > recently... > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, > Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: > 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or > proprietary information which > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for > the named recipient(s). > If an addressing or transmission error has > misdirected the email, please > notify the author by replying to this message. If > you are not the named > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, > distribute, copy, print > or rely on this email, and should immediately delete > it from your computer. > > > -Original Message- > From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:45 PM > To: Reimer, Fred > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] > > > hi reimer, > > >Thanks for ur reply but not getting wht u want to > say. coz i told u i install , CATIOS6000 , Entity , > Switchaddlet, CLIparser still i can't see i mean it > is > coming intopology but with ? . so pls suggest me > > Thanks & Regards, > Milind Tare > > --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > > If you happen to be running PIM Sparse-Dense mode > > with auto-RP and > > "duplicate" loopback IP addresses then you need a > > special patch for > > CiscoWorks in order for it to properly discover > the > > 6509's... This probably > > effects anything that has "duplicate" loopback IP > > addresses. > > > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, > > Atlanta, GA 30338 > > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: > > 888-260-2050 > > > > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or > > proprietary information which > > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for > > the named recipient(s). > > If an addressing or transmission error has > > misdirected the email, please > > notify the author by replying to this message. If > > you are not the named > > recipient, you are not authorized to use, > disclose, > > distribute, copy, print > > or rely on this email, and should immediately > delete > > it from your computer. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:54 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > In my network MPLS VPN is there and the > cisco > > devices having 7513,6509 and GSR. but in topology > i > > am > > not getting 6509 which is having OSM-4ge-wan card > > and > > i can't detect the module in topology services. > > i have installed related pathches like CLiparaser, > > catios6000, switchaddlets etc...but still getting > > problem ? is coming in topology services. > > > > please guide me urgently > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > milind > > > > __ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site > > design software > > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the > > GroupStudy Store: > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site > design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75271&t=75227 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Solutions for the Solie Labs - ?? [7:75239]
Ive got them here (along with my review of the book) http://www.optsys.net/cciepractreview.htm thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccbootcamp.com (cisco training) ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello,Does any one if there is a way to get the solutions for the Solie > Labs from CCIE PS Vol. I?Thank you. > > > > Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75261&t=75239 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: NAT and SAP [7:74982]
SAP, SAP, what the heck is SAP? At first I thought it was SIP, but that doesn't sound right. Maybe it's referring to the COMPANY SAP? If so, what specific application are you talking about? I must say SAP's website is a nightmare. Looks like all marketing speak to me. Bunch of mumbo jumbo and everything is hard to find. So much for customer relationships! But those are just my opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of my employer ;-) Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAT and SAP [7:74982] Different approach: Howmany clients? Static Nat on the router the other way around? Give the server a route pointer to the nat router for the client. You even can choose to give the client a global ip to connect to the server with, like a mail server for example. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 8 september 2003 18:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: NAT and SAP [7:74982] When a SAP client tries to connect to a SAP server through a router with NAT enabled there is a problem: the SAP server sends an IP embedded on the payload of the packet, and the NAT router do not translate it. Any suggestion? **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75272&t=74982 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Mailing list conversion we are moving .... [7:75275]
If you are subscribed to this list via e-mail, we will be transitioning to a new server with new software. Within the next few hours you will receive a welcome message from the new server.Please save this e-mail as it contains your password and subscription instructions. If you never receive the welcome message, and you are receiving this list via e-mail, please send me an e-mail. If you are not receiving messages from the new server once the transition is complete, again please report it. In both cases, before you report it, please make sure it is not a problem on your end (i.e. your anti-spam filters etc.). The upgrade should take care of a number of problems including the time required to distribute mail and various digest options. Also, do not forget about our online meeting -- 8:00 PM at Chat.GroupStudy.com! Take care, Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75275&t=75275 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227]
I still don't know what you mean by "? is coming on that box" Do you mean for the OSM module? That's not listed in the supported devices for Campus Manager (which I'm assuming you mean by the "topology view." You might try asking at [EMAIL PROTECTED] They have many more CiscoWorks people over there. I'll cross-post... Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:11 PM To: Reimer, Fred Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] hi reimer, Thanks for ur reply, and extremely sorry for mis communication. i will explain u my porblem. I install ciscoworks. I have GSR,7513,6509,3512 in my network. but in topology view i can see 7513,3512,and GSR. I install CATIOS6000,Switchaddlets,Entity, CLIparser. about 6509 the box is coming in Topology but "?" is coming on that box. Thanks & Regards, Milind Tare --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > Communications problem. I don't understand what you > are asking. Try using > more words. Be verbose. I may be able to > understand then... > > As far as I can tell: > You are not having any problems discovering the > 6509. It is in the > topology. In your original messages, you said you > were NOT getting the 6509 > in the topology. See my confusion? > > Beyond that, I don't know what your problem is, so I > can't suggest a > solution. > > Just an off-the-wall guess, you probably need to > load up the latest device > information file (Incremental Device thingy) in > CiscoWorks to recognize a > particular module that may have been released > recently... > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, > Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: > 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or > proprietary information which > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for > the named recipient(s). > If an addressing or transmission error has > misdirected the email, please > notify the author by replying to this message. If > you are not the named > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, > distribute, copy, print > or rely on this email, and should immediately delete > it from your computer. > > > -Original Message- > From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:45 PM > To: Reimer, Fred > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] > > > hi reimer, > > >Thanks for ur reply but not getting wht u want to > say. coz i told u i install , CATIOS6000 , Entity , > Switchaddlet, CLIparser still i can't see i mean it > is > coming intopology but with ? . so pls suggest me > > Thanks & Regards, > Milind Tare > > --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > > If you happen to be running PIM Sparse-Dense mode > > with auto-RP and > > "duplicate" loopback IP addresses then you need a > > special patch for > > CiscoWorks in order for it to properly discover > the > > 6509's... This probably > > effects anything that has "duplicate" loopback IP > > addresses. > > > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, > > Atlanta, GA 30338 > > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: > > 888-260-2050 > > > > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or > > proprietary information which > > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for > > the named recipient(s). > > If an addressing or transmission error has > > misdirected the email, please > > notify the author by replying to this message. If > > you are not the named > > recipient, you are not authorized to use, > disclose, > > distribute, copy, print > > or rely on this email, and should immediately > delete > > it from your computer. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:54 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > In my network MPLS VPN is there and the > cisco > > devices having 7513,6509 and GSR. but in topology > i > > am > > not getting 6509 which is having OSM-4ge-wan card > > and > > i can't detect the module in topology services. > > i have installed related pathches like CLiparaser, > > catios6000, switchaddlets etc...but still getting > > problem ? is coming in topology services.
RE: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem [7:75277]
Try an access-list that denies ICMP and then use IP accounting access- violations to see - more than likely a virus > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem > [7:75238] > > > I have a customer that has a small office with a Cisco 56K > Frame router. > They > are running Nat. Now when I plug in the frame side the > ethernet side gets > constant request for translation then it gets to the point > where you can no > longer even ping the ethernet side. If I remove the RG45 > cable from the > frame side. > No problem the request stop and I can ping my ethernet side > of the router > fine with 10ml sec responses all day. The users office is > down because he > can not > get out to the web. I've checked for viruses and everything > seems fine. Does > anyone have any ideas? This one is driving me crazy. The ISP > says that my > router is bad, but I doubt it. It started all of a sudden > after working fine > for 2 > years. > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75277&t=75277 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Free Rack Time [7:75273]
I need 10-20 people to beta test a new online cisco lab time rental system. Anyone who would like free lab time and can answer a couple questions after, please respond. -- Jay Greenberg CCIE #11021 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75273&t=75273 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: question on acl [7:75257]
Er, yes you can. Two people have already replied on how. Use a WILDCARD mask of 0.0.0.254. Simple, easy, effective. I'd hate to have to type in 128 permit statements. Probably end up writing a Perl one-liner, but the easier way is to use the proper WILDCARD mask. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: question on acl [7:75257] As multiple single entries - you can not summarize these... A better way is to have all the specific users that must be denied to be in a summarizable subnet -Original Message- From: Yong Wee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 September 2003 17:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: question on acl [7:75257] Hi, How do you write an ext acl to block telnet access from even addresses in subnet 192.168.2.0/24 (i.e, .2, .4, .6 etc) to server 192.168.1.254? rgds, yongwee **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75280&t=75257 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: NAT and SAP [7:74982]
Different approach: Howmany clients? Static Nat on the router the other way around? Give the server a route pointer to the nat router for the client. You even can choose to give the client a global ip to connect to the server with, like a mail server for example. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 8 september 2003 18:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: NAT and SAP [7:74982] When a SAP client tries to connect to a SAP server through a router with NAT enabled there is a problem: the SAP server sends an IP embedded on the payload of the packet, and the NAT router do not translate it. Any suggestion? **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75276&t=74982 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
BSCI 640-901 [7:75259]
Hello people, I am sitting the exam on next Monday (22nd September). Has anyone taken the exam recently? I just want to know what the passing score is. Thank you. Cheers, Kenan **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75279&t=75259 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: help [7:75225]
Oops! I am moving the mailing list users to a new server and was testing the new server. I inadvertently sent one of the test messages to the active list. At 3:00 AM when stuff is not working, yelling "help" does not seem like a bad idea :-). By the way, the move should be done by this afternoon. Unless I get tied up with something else, you will receive a welcome message (those that read via e-mail) describing the new server. Take care, Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of annlee Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: help [7:75225] problem? Paul Borghese wrote: > help > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75274&t=75225 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: {Spam?} question on acl [7:75258]
Robert, Yes.. You absolutley CAN... See previous reply... Robert Perez wrote: > > You would have to do each host individually as: > > access-list 110 deny tcp host 192.168.2.2 host 192.168.1.254 eq > 23 > > You cannot choose only even addresses with any kind of command. > Atleast not > that I am aware of. > > -Original Message- > From: Yong Wee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: {Spam?} question on acl [7:75258] > > > Hi, >How do you write an ext acl to block telnet access from even > addresses in > subnet 192.168.2.0/24 (i.e, .2, .4, .6 etc) to server > 192.168.1.254? > > thks, > yongwee > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy > Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription > info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75283&t=75258 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: [NMSU-CW2K] RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227]
Fred, The "?" in the icon on the Topology map means it's an unknown device. It knows it's CDP supported but it can not identify it's Cisco Device ID or the sysObjectID. There are a couple of reasons for this including the fact they are in reality HP JetDirects, New HP Servers (they both support CDP ) or the device or OS version is not supported by the version CW2K he has. Regards, Pete Peter P. Benac, CCNA Emacolet Networking Services, Inc Providing Systems and Network Consulting, Training, Web Hosting Services Phone: 919-847-1740 or 866-701-2345 Web: http://www.emacolet.com Need quick reliable Systems or Network Management advice visit http://www.nmsusers.org To have principles... First have courage.. With principles comes integrity!!! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reimer, Fred > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 13:58 > To: milind tare > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [NMSU-CW2K] RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] > > > I still don't know what you mean by "? is coming on that box" > Do you mean for the OSM module? That's not listed in the > supported devices for Campus Manager (which I'm assuming you > mean by the "topology view." > > You might try asking at [EMAIL PROTECTED] They have > many more CiscoWorks people over there. I'll cross-post... > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary > information which may be legally privileged. It is intended > only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or > transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify > the author by replying to this message. If you are not the > named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, > distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should > immediately delete it from your computer. > > > -Original Message- > From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:11 PM > To: Reimer, Fred > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] > > hi reimer, > > Thanks for ur reply, and extremely sorry for mis > communication. i will explain u my porblem. > > I install ciscoworks. I have GSR,7513,6509,3512 in > my network. but in topology view i can see > 7513,3512,and GSR. > >I install CATIOS6000,Switchaddlets,Entity, > CLIparser. > >about 6509 the box is coming in Topology but "?" is > coming on that box. > > Thanks & Regards, > Milind Tare > --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > > Communications problem. I don't understand what you > > are asking. Try using > > more words. Be verbose. I may be able to > > understand then... > > > > As far as I can tell: > > You are not having any problems discovering the > > 6509. It is in the > > topology. In your original messages, you said you > > were NOT getting the 6509 > > in the topology. See my confusion? > > > > Beyond that, I don't know what your problem is, so I > > can't suggest a > > solution. > > > > Just an off-the-wall guess, you probably need to > > load up the latest device > > information file (Incremental Device thingy) in > > CiscoWorks to recognize a > > particular module that may have been released > > recently... > > > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, > > Atlanta, GA 30338 > > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: > > 888-260-2050 > > > > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or > > proprietary information which > > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for > > the named recipient(s). > > If an addressing or transmission error has > > misdirected the email, please > > notify the author by replying to this message. If > > you are not the named > > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, > distribute, copy, > > print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete > > it from your computer. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:45 PM > > To: Reimer, Fred > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227] > > > > > > hi reimer, > > > > > >Thanks for ur reply but not getting wht u want to > > say. coz i told u i install , CATIOS6000 , Entity , Switchaddlet, > > CLIparser still i can't see i mean it is > > coming intopology but with ? . so pls suggest me > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Milind Tare > > > > --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > > > If you happen to be running PIM Sparse-Dense mode > > > with auto-RP and > > > "duplicate" loopback IP addresses then you need a > > > special patch for > > > CiscoWorks in order for it to properly discover > > the > > > 6509's... This probably > > > effects anything that has "duplicate" loopback IP addresses. > > > > >
RE: {Spam?} question on acl [7:75258]
Well, we have two right answers (you can do it with a wildcard mask of 0.0.0.254) and two wrong answers (it's not possible). I'll break the tie and say you can do it ;-) Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Robert Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: {Spam?} question on acl [7:75258] You would have to do each host individually as: access-list 110 deny tcp host 192.168.2.2 host 192.168.1.254 eq 23 You cannot choose only even addresses with any kind of command. Atleast not that I am aware of. -Original Message- From: Yong Wee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: {Spam?} question on acl [7:75258] Hi, How do you write an ext acl to block telnet access from even addresses in subnet 192.168.2.0/24 (i.e, .2, .4, .6 etc) to server 192.168.1.254? thks, yongwee **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75282&t=75258 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem [7:75285]
Do a sh ip nat trans. Are you seeing a quadrillion icmp translations all sourcing a same host or few hosts? Dave Andrew Larkins wrote: > Try an access-list that denies ICMP and then use IP accounting access- > violations to see - more than likely a virus > > >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:01 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem >>[7:75238] >> >> >>I have a customer that has a small office with a Cisco 56K >>Frame router. >>They >>are running Nat. Now when I plug in the frame side the >>ethernet side gets >>constant request for translation then it gets to the point >>where you can no >>longer even ping the ethernet side. If I remove the RG45 >>cable from the >>frame side. >>No problem the request stop and I can ping my ethernet side >>of the router >>fine with 10ml sec responses all day. The users office is >>down because he >>can not >>get out to the web. I've checked for viruses and everything >>seems fine. Does >>anyone have any ideas? This one is driving me crazy. The ISP >>says that my >>router is bad, but I doubt it. It started all of a sudden >>after working fine >>for 2 >>years. >>**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: >>http://shop.groupstudy.com >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75285&t=75285 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Free Rack Time [7:75273]
Counting me in and where do we go from here? Thank you Ollie AT&T Common Backbone 866-397-7309 Opt 1 -Original Message- From: Jay Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Free Rack Time [7:75273] I need 10-20 people to beta test a new online cisco lab time rental system. Anyone who would like free lab time and can answer a couple questions after, please respond. -- Jay Greenberg CCIE #11021 **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75286&t=75273 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html