Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
dear Laughing Checker, someone told me that once a student mentioned to the teacher that some people thought his teaching was brain washing. He replied, and here I'm paraphrasing: some brains needs washing. So dear Laughing Checker, since cavorting is a celestial experience for me, I don't think it is MY brain that needs washing with regards to that. Et tu Brute? As for your ordinary lay meditators, are they related to Emily's laywomen by any chance?! From: laughinggull108 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:52 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally > forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT the > one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. Now hold on there just a daggone minute Missy Dirty Mind! 'Cavorting' in the bushes? Where do you come up with these ideas? Let's look at it again, this time with a pure mind: It had been a really long, long time since you had been checked (wink, wink, nudge, nudge), and seeker Steve, being the 'exceptional' checker that he is (of course, I wouldn't know from personal experience) was more than willing to oblige. The bushes along the river provided the privacy needed, and the springy patches of moss provided comfortable seats. However, the first attempt was interrupted (commonly referred to as checkus interruptus*) when seeker Xeno stumbled upon yours truly selling water by the river. As a result, seeker Steve was very anxious to get back at it because, being the 'exceptional' checker that he is, knows that coming out of a checking session too quickly and without completion can lead to a condition commonly referred to as Krishna butterballs* for the checker and lackus fulfillmentitus* for the checkee. (It's also worth noting that he tries never to end a checking prematurely.) However, nature was supportive in the end and both of you were able to have a nice, long uninterrupted checking in which seeker Steve, I guess one could say, checked your brains out. (And he chose to stay and meditate with you rather than quietly leave the bushes.) It is easy? You experienced how easy it is? Now this is how we will meditate morning and evening... *these are sacred terms learned only on a qualified TTC, and are not available for use by ordinary lay meditators. Raviji, like jelly beans, also comes in many flavors, including cinnamon. > Obviously the San Diego sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, > which he, meaning Ravi of course, doesn't even like us to talk about! His > brain I mean. Neuroscience and all that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence > of this addling is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological > rape and inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?! And > all the effing this and effing that. One is sorely tempted to urge Nephew > to get some new material for gosh sakes! It's a new year. Even in Western > astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new season. It's almost a > new month. Get with the new program, Newphew! Sorry couldn't resist that > lame pun smiley faces all around. > > > > > ________ > From: Ravi Chivukula > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > >  > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest > - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, > of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with > words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a > word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - > everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then > equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if > she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to > ask you and Share to take your orgies offline. > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius > wrote: > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > > > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it > >> longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > &g
Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
Plus Ravi, look how I've saved you! Your buddy Emily is now into neuroscience too and though you've been so opposed to that in the recent past of 2013, I have now given you the impetus to leap beyond that er, is it ok if I call it a limit? I do realize you have FEW limits of engagement, but dear Nephew, are you quite sure you have none? Anyway with all love and gratitude for helping me get beyond my many limits. Usually by making me laugh out loud. I would miss you sorely if you left FFL. Jeez I hope salyavin and turq and all the others who don't like putting to So and So in the Subject line are appreciating my restraint in this matter. It's a pain in the tukas IMHO! From: Ravi Chivukula To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:58 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] oh dear Aunt Share - fear not, 'cause my mind ain't addled no more. Not after this post of yours Aunt Share - it's led to much illumination. What I hear Aunt is that in-authenticity and psychological rape are a thing of the past - so 2012. This is wonderful Auntie - certainly you have been quite authentic with me in the recent past and it's good to know that I don't have to cringe anymore and will not have to hear any squealing, shrieking or moaning of yours in response to Xeno's or Curtis's posts. Surely you have realized they are not as authentic as your dear nephew. You realize you are just a robotic POV to His Holiness Curtis and a text on a screen to Guru Xeno. You know the minute you are audacious enough to cross your limits - you will be humiliated, either His Holiness's - "toxic energy directed towards strangers on internet" curse or Guru Xeno processing any posts over 200 words through a text compactor. Your erstwhile icons have limits of engagement, your nephew none. This cavorting in the bushes, possibly with Steve or LG sounds totally good to me - they are nice guys, honest and open at least. And thank you for that consigning that phrase psychological rape to the dustbin - you don't know how many times I wondered when you would lob that at me - but I have been lucky Auntie, because even the 3-4 neurotic birches I have had the misfortune of trying to be loving, playful and/or vulnerable around Amma never even remotely came close to you. So this is all good news. No - a new day has dawned in the long, bitter, embattled history of the Long Ladislaw feud, I promise Auntie - I will strive for new material from today on. Thank you, this feels really good. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Share Long wrote: > >dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally >forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT the >one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. Obviously the San Diego sun and >southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning Ravi of course, >doesn't even like us to talk about! His brain I mean. Neuroscience and all >that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence of this addling is his being stuck in >the past with talk of psychological rape and inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't >that just so so LAST year?! And all the effing this and effing that. One is >sorely tempted to urge Nephew to get some new material for gosh sakes! It's a >new year. Even in Western astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new >season. It's almost a new month. Get with the new program, Newphew! Sorry >couldn't resist that lame pun smiley faces all around. > > > > > > > >________________ > From: Ravi Chivukula >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > > > >"Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > >Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest - >and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, of >dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with >words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a >word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - >everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then >equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if >she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to ask >you and Share to take your orgies offline. > > >Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > >On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius > wrote: > > >>
Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
oh dear Aunt Share - fear not, 'cause my mind ain't addled no more. Not after this post of yours Aunt Share - it's led to much illumination. What I hear Aunt is that in-authenticity and psychological rape are a thing of the past - so 2012. This is wonderful Auntie - certainly you have been quite authentic with me in the recent past and it's good to know that I don't have to cringe anymore and will not have to hear any squealing, shrieking or moaning of yours in response to Xeno's or Curtis's posts. Surely you have realized they are not as authentic as your dear nephew. You realize you are just a robotic POV to His Holiness Curtis and a text on a screen to Guru Xeno. You know the minute you are audacious enough to cross your limits - you will be humiliated, either His Holiness's - "toxic energy directed towards strangers on internet" curse or Guru Xeno processing any posts over 200 words through a text compactor. Your erstwhile icons have limits of engagement, your nephew none. This cavorting in the bushes, possibly with Steve or LG sounds totally good to me - they are nice guys, honest and open at least. And thank you for that consigning that phrase psychological rape to the dustbin - you don't know how many times I wondered when you would lob that at me - but I have been lucky Auntie, because even the 3-4 neurotic birches I have had the misfortune of trying to be loving, playful and/or vulnerable around Amma never even remotely came close to you. So this is all good news. No - a new day has dawned in the long, bitter, embattled history of the Long Ladislaw feud, I promise Auntie - I will strive for new material from today on. Thank you, this feels really good. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Share Long wrote: > ** > > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally > forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT > the one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. Obviously the San Diego > sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning Ravi > of course, doesn't even like us to talk about! His brain I mean. > Neuroscience and all that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence of this addling > is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape and > inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?! And all the > effing this and effing that. One is sorely tempted to urge Nephew to get > some new material for gosh sakes! It's a new year. Even in Western > astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new season. It's almost a > new month. Get with the new program, Newphew! Sorry couldn't resist that > lame pun smiley faces all around. > > > > ------ > *From:* Ravi Chivukula > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least > honest - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man > basically, of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in > your mind with words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with > words might be just a word in your mind called "hard-on". It really > reflects in your writing - everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as > if you are a zombie. And then equally hilarious is when I see someone like > Share react to you - it's as if she actually had sex with you and you made > her come. I'm always tempted to ask you and Share to take your orgies > offline. > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius < > anartax...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > ** > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > > > Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made > it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to > do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often > sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take > in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors > already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a > computer to do it FOR me! > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and > well designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of > Robin's was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far > to
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
I have always been a proponent of regular checking. But quite honestly, there have been times when I have not been able to cover all the checking steps and have had to settle for an abbreviated version. But the end result has still always been satisfactory. At least that has been my experience. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > > > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT the one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. > > Now hold on there just a daggone minute Missy Dirty Mind! 'Cavorting' in the bushes? Where do you come up with these ideas? Let's look at it again, this time with a pure mind: It had been a really long, long time since you had been checked (wink, wink, nudge, nudge), and seeker Steve, being the 'exceptional' checker that he is (of course, I wouldn't know from personal experience) was more than willing to oblige. The bushes along the river provided the privacy needed, and the springy patches of moss provided comfortable seats. However, the first attempt was interrupted (commonly referred to as checkus interruptus*) when seeker Xeno stumbled upon yours truly selling water by the river. As a result, seeker Steve was very anxious to get back at it because, being the 'exceptional' checker that he is, knows that coming out of a checking session too quickly and without completion can lead to a condition commonly referred to as Krishna butterballs* for the checker and lackus fulfillmentitus* for the checkee. (It's also worth noting that he tries never to end a checking prematurely.) However, nature was supportive in the end and both of you were able to have a nice, long uninterrupted checking in which seeker Steve, I guess one could say, checked your brains out. (And he chose to stay and meditate with you rather than quietly leave the bushes.) It is easy? You experienced how easy it is? Now this is how we will meditate morning and evening... > > *these are sacred terms learned only on a qualified TTC, and are not available for use by ordinary lay meditators. > > Raviji, like jelly beans, also comes in many flavors, including cinnamon. > > > Obviously the San Diego sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning Ravi of course, doesn't even like us to talk about! His brain I mean. Neuroscience and all that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence of this addling is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape and inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?! And all the effing this and effing that. One is sorely tempted to urge Nephew to get some new material for gosh sakes! It's a new year. Even in Western astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new season. It's almost a new month. Get with the new program, Newphew! Sorry couldn't resist that lame pun smiley faces all around. > > > > > > > > > > ____ > > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > > > > >  > > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to ask you and Share to take your orgies offline. > > > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > > > > > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text co
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally > forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT the > one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. Now hold on there just a daggone minute Missy Dirty Mind! 'Cavorting' in the bushes? Where do you come up with these ideas? Let's look at it again, this time with a pure mind: It had been a really long, long time since you had been checked (wink, wink, nudge, nudge), and seeker Steve, being the 'exceptional' checker that he is (of course, I wouldn't know from personal experience) was more than willing to oblige. The bushes along the river provided the privacy needed, and the springy patches of moss provided comfortable seats. However, the first attempt was interrupted (commonly referred to as checkus interruptus*) when seeker Xeno stumbled upon yours truly selling water by the river. As a result, seeker Steve was very anxious to get back at it because, being the 'exceptional' checker that he is, knows that coming out of a checking session too quickly and without completion can lead to a condition commonly referred to as Krishna butterballs* for the checker and lackus fulfillmentitus* for the checkee. (It's also worth noting that he tries never to end a checking prematurely.) However, nature was supportive in the end and both of you were able to have a nice, long uninterrupted checking in which seeker Steve, I guess one could say, checked your brains out. (And he chose to stay and meditate with you rather than quietly leave the bushes.) It is easy? You experienced how easy it is? Now this is how we will meditate morning and evening... *these are sacred terms learned only on a qualified TTC, and are not available for use by ordinary lay meditators. Raviji, like jelly beans, also comes in many flavors, including cinnamon. > Obviously the San Diego sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, > which he, meaning Ravi of course, doesn't even like us to talk about! His > brain I mean. Neuroscience and all that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence > of this addling is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological > rape and inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?! And > all the effing this and effing that. One is sorely tempted to urge Nephew > to get some new material for gosh sakes! It's a new year. Even in Western > astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new season. It's almost a > new month. Get with the new program, Newphew! Sorry couldn't resist that > lame pun smiley faces all around. > > > > > ____ > From: Ravi Chivukula > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > >  > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest > - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, > of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with > words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a > word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - > everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then > equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if > she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to > ask you and Share to take your orgies offline. > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius > wrote: > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > > > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it > >> longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > >> randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to > >> do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often > >> sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take > >> in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors > >> already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a > >> computer to do it FOR me! > > > > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and well > designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of Robin's
Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
l'chaim (-: From: seventhray27 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 6:58 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] Well it's better than being a cookie monster, or a candy monster, which is where I sometimes find myself. (-: Actually my cousin had a family issue, so the Passover is schedeled for tomorrow, and I confess that I am looking forward to two or three glasses of Mogen David sweet wine. (-: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > Wa! Steve, Laughing One Jelly Bean called me a > literary monster! Will you go pummel him for me? > BTW, hope you had a wonderful Passover (-: > > > > > > From: seventhray27 steve.sundur@... > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:10 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > >  > Hey, at least he's gotten into doing some research with regard to his > postings. That's a new twist. And aren't we sorely tried to find > something new in anything he posts? Like he's found a new pastime. As Edg > would say, "Good on ya Ravi" > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > > > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally > > forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT > > the one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. Obviously the San > > Diego sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning > > Ravi of course, doesn't even like us to talk about! His brain I > > mean. Neuroscience and all that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence of > > this addling is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape > > and inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?! > > And all the effing this and effing that. One is sorely tempted to urge > > Nephew to get some new material for gosh sakes! It's a new year. > > Even in Western astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new > > season. It's almost a new month. Get with the new program, > > Newphew! Sorry couldn't resist that lame pun smiley faces all around. > >    > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > > > > >  > > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least > > honest - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man > > basically, of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in > > your mind with words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with > > words might be just a word in your mind called "hard-on". It really > > reflects in your writing - everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as > > if you are a zombie. And then equally hilarious is when I see someone like > > Share react to you - it's as if she actually had sex with you and you made > > her come. I'm always tempted to ask you and Share to take your orgies > > offline. > > > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" awoelflebater@ wrote: > > > > > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made > > >> it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > > >> randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program > > >> to do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is > > >> often sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail > > >> to take in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text > > >> compactors already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I > > >> don't require a computer to do it FOR me! > > > > > > > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and > > well designed programs do not use
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
Well it's better than being a cookie monster, or a candy monster, which is where I sometimes find myself. (-: Actually my cousin had a family issue, so the Passover is schedeled for tomorrow, and I confess that I am looking forward to two or three glasses of Mogen David sweet wine. (-: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > Wa! Steve, Laughing One Jelly Bean called me a literary monster! Will you go pummel him for me? > BTW, hope you had a wonderful Passover (-: > > > > > > From: seventhray27 steve.sundur@... > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:10 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > >  > Hey, at least he's gotten into doing some research with regard to his postings. That's a new twist. And aren't we sorely tried to find something new in anything he posts? Like he's found a new pastime. As Edg would say, "Good on ya Ravi" > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > > > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT the one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes.àObviously the San Diego sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning Ravi of course, doesn't even like us to talk about!àHis brain I mean.àNeuroscience and all that bullocks.àAnyway, more evidence of this addling is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape and inauthenticity.àDear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?!àAnd all the effing this and effing that.àOne is sorely tempted to urge Nephew to get some new material for gosh sakes!àIt's a new year.àEven in Western astrology.àEven in the Chinese system.àIt's a new season.àIt's almost a new month.àGet with the new program, Newphew!àSorry couldn't resist that lame pun smiley faces all around.à> > ààà> > > > > > > > > > ________ > > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > > > > > à> > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to ask you and Share to take your orgies offline. > > > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@ wrote: > > > > > > >à> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" awoelflebater@ wrote: > > > > > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a computer to do it FOR me! > > > > > > > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and well designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of Robin's was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far too much. Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. Some manual editing might be needed. The software works better if the original document has a well defined structure. > > > > > >'HOW IT WORKS' > > > > > >'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence based on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The most important sentence is deemed to be
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > dear Xeno, following in your footsteps I had this RWC joke squashed: I am > Curtis; Ravi is Barry. What can I do? That was the best he ever wrote! Funny and creative. Couldn't he have just stuck with this brevity? But then he explains that all this joking around is just an act of desperation to him, because the *truth* was lost. To me his rap is completely overwrought. Xeno's text-compactor serves as a good satire. > my result: IC RB Wo? > > Squashing has as if rendered me whole! I no longer need you to be my Guru > but along with Ravi, I will always love you and be grateful. > > > > From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:36 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > >  > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > > > Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it > > longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > > randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to > > do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often > > sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take > > in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors > > already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a > > computer to do it FOR me! > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and well > designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of Robin's > was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far too much. > Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. Some manual > editing might be needed. The software works better if the original document > has a well defined structure. > > 'HOW IT WORKS' > > 'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of > each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence based > on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The most > important sentence is deemed to be the sentence with the highest frequency > count.' > > 'Obviously, human readers may disagree with this automated approach to text > summarization. Automated text summarization works best on expository text > such as textbooks and reference material (non-fiction). The results can be > skewed when a passage has only a few sentences. Text Compactor is not > recommended for use with fiction (i.e., stories about imaginary people, > places, events).' > > As the result with that post was not particularly good, I conclude Robin and > his exposition is the result of an imaginary person writing about imaginary > places and events, though Ann and Curtis seem reasonably real. But of course > I can't be sure. Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me. >
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > Wa! Steve, Laughing One Jelly Bean called me a > literary monster! Will you go pummel him for me? > BTW, hope you had a wonderful Passover (-: > Let's not forget that I also called myself one...I'm the "or two"...and also Jim. Does that mean I get three pummelings? Oh dear! > > > From: seventhray27 > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:10 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > >  > Hey, at least he's gotten into doing some research with regard to his > postings. That's a new twist. And aren't we sorely tried to find > something new in anything he posts? Like he's found a new pastime. As Edg > would say, "Good on ya Ravi" > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally > > forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT > > the one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes.àObviously the San > > Diego sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning > > Ravi of course, doesn't even like us to talk about!àHis brain I > > mean.àNeuroscience and all that bullocks.àAnyway, more evidence of > > this addling is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape > > and inauthenticity.àDear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?!à> > And all the effing this and effing that.àOne is sorely tempted to urge > > Nephew to get some new material for gosh sakes!àIt's a new year.à> > Even in Western astrology.àEven in the Chinese system.àIt's a new > > season.àIt's almost a new month.àGet with the new program, > > Newphew!àSorry couldn't resist that lame pun smiley faces all > > around.à> > ààà> > > > > > > > > > > > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > > > > > à> > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least > > honest - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man > > basically, of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in > > your mind with words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with > > words might be just a word in your mind called "hard-on". It really > > reflects in your writing - everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as > > if you are a zombie. And then equally hilarious is when I see someone like > > Share react to you - it's as if she actually had sex with you and you made > > her come. I'm always tempted to ask you and Share to take your orgies > > offline. > > > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@ wrote: > > > > > > >à> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" awoelflebater@ wrote: > > > > > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made > > >> it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > > >> randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program > > >> to do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is > > >> often sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail > > >> to take in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text > > >> compactors already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I > > >> don't require a computer to do it FOR me! > > > > > > > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and > > well designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of > > Robin's was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far > > too much. Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. > > Some manual editing might be needed. The software works better if the > > original document has a well defined structure. > > > > > >'H
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
I had forgotten about my earlier exposition on His Holiness, into The Holy Trinity. The triumverate, in glorious worship of the "dead little man" persona. Two little candles, B and C, with puddles at their feet, in the face of the noonday sun. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > A blast from the past - > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300308 > > (for the clueless doctordumbass = futur.musik) > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:49 PM, doctordumbass@... < > no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > The monkey, the mannequin, and the squeeze toy. Funny to see Boy Scientist > > Curtis in his lab coat, railing at the podium one minute, and then when the > > subject changes to interpersonal dynamics, he is suddenly dumb as a post. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula > > wrote: > > > > > > His Holiness must be just chilling out yeah? In a jovial, playful mood? > > Sweet to see his antics. > > > > > > Because applying your disinterested, impartial POV persona I'm able to > > gather a lot of information even from that compacted text. > > > > > > I won't be waiting for yours and Guru Xeno's disinterested, impartial > > analysis though because we know your personas and your target, captive > > audience. > > > > > > > > > On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "curtisdeltablues" > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hilarious, what a project. > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and > > Ann's comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor > > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I > > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the > > remainder by about 50%. This is the result: > > > > > > > > > > Robin: > > > > > > > > > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you > > trapped inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited > > for ends which falsify why it exists.' > > > > > > > > > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and > > Robin; "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person > > he does not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry > > does demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is > > subjectively reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your > > representation of what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis > > was and made it over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there > > was hardly anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all > > interested in anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. > > "Funny thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the > > saying > > of it.' > > > > > > > > > > > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' > > > > > > > > > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed > > AWB to fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has > > not been informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what > > AWB declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you > > have sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' > > > > > > > > > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my > > analysis, Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not > > give you that opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus > > operandi.' > > > > > > > > > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have > > this tacit pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or > > handshakes): You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all > > times.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
Wa! Steve, Laughing One Jelly Bean called me a literary monster! Will you go pummel him for me? BTW, hope you had a wonderful Passover (-: From: seventhray27 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:10 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] Hey, at least he's gotten into doing some research with regard to his postings. That's a new twist. And aren't we sorely tried to find something new in anything he posts? Like he's found a new pastime. As Edg would say, "Good on ya Ravi" --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally > forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT the > one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. Obviously the San Diego sun > and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning Ravi of > course, doesn't even like us to talk about! His brain I mean. > Neuroscience and all that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence of this addling > is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape and > inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?! And all the > effing this and effing that. One is sorely tempted to urge Nephew to get > some new material for gosh sakes! It's a new year. Even in Western > astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new season. It's almost a > new month. Get with the new program, Newphew! Sorry couldn't resist that > lame pun smiley faces all around. >    > > > > > > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > >  > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest > - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, > of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with > words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a > word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - > everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then > equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if > she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to > ask you and Share to take your orgies offline. > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" awoelflebater@ wrote: > > > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it > >> longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > >> randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to > >> do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often > >> sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take > >> in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors > >> already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a > >> computer to do it FOR me! > > > > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and well > designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of Robin's > was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far too much. > Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. Some manual > editing might be needed. The software works better if the original document > has a well defined structure. > > > >'HOW IT WORKS' > > > >'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of > >each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence > >based on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The most > >important sentence is deemed to be the sentence with the highest frequency > >count.' > > > >'Obviously, human readers may disagree with this automated approach to text > >summarization. Automated text summarization works best on expository text > >such as textbooks and reference material (non-fiction). The results can be > >skewed when a passage has only a few sentences. Text Compactor is not > >recommended for use with fiction (i.e., stories about imaginary people, > >places, events).' > > > >As the result with that post was not particularly good, I conclude Robin and > >his exposition is the result of an imaginary person writing about imaginary > >places and events, though Ann and Curtis seem reasonably real. But of course > >I can't be sure. Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me. > > > > >
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
Hey, at least he's gotten into doing some research with regard to his postings. That's a new twist. And aren't we sorely tried to find something new in anything he posts? Like he's found a new pastime. As Edg would say, "Good on ya Ravi" --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT the one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. Obviously the San Diego sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning Ravi of course, doesn't even like us to talk about! His brain I mean. Neuroscience and all that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence of this addling is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape and inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?! And all the effing this and effing that. One is sorely tempted to urge Nephew to get some new material for gosh sakes! It's a new year. Even in Western astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new season. It's almost a new month. Get with the new program, Newphew! Sorry couldn't resist that lame pun smiley faces all around. >    > > > > > > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] > > >  > "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." > > Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to ask you and Share to take your orgies offline. > > Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" awoelflebater@ wrote: > > > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a computer to do it FOR me! > > > > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and well designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of Robin's was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far too much. Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. Some manual editing might be needed. The software works better if the original document has a well defined structure. > > > >'HOW IT WORKS' > > > >'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence based on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The most important sentence is deemed to be the sentence with the highest frequency count.' > > > >'Obviously, human readers may disagree with this automated approach to text summarization. Automated text summarization works best on expository text such as textbooks and reference material (non-fiction). The results can be skewed when a passage has only a few sentences. Text Compactor is not recommended for use with fiction (i.e., stories about imaginary people, places, events).' > > > >As the result with that post was not particularly good, I conclude Robin and his exposition is the result of an imaginary person writing about imaginary places and events, though Ann and Curtis seem reasonably real. But of course I can't be sure. Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me. > > > > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
dear Xeno, following in your footsteps I had this RWC joke squashed: I am Curtis; Ravi is Barry. What can I do? my result: IC RB Wo? Squashing has as if rendered me whole! I no longer need you to be my Guru but along with Ravi, I will always love you and be grateful. From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:36 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it > longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to do > this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often sloppy > or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take in half of > what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors already and I > don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a computer to do it > FOR me! This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and well designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of Robin's was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far too much. Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. Some manual editing might be needed. The software works better if the original document has a well defined structure. 'HOW IT WORKS' 'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence based on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The most important sentence is deemed to be the sentence with the highest frequency count.' 'Obviously, human readers may disagree with this automated approach to text summarization. Automated text summarization works best on expository text such as textbooks and reference material (non-fiction). The results can be skewed when a passage has only a few sentences. Text Compactor is not recommended for use with fiction (i.e., stories about imaginary people, places, events).' As the result with that post was not particularly good, I conclude Robin and his exposition is the result of an imaginary person writing about imaginary places and events, though Ann and Curtis seem reasonably real. But of course I can't be sure. Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
dear Laughing One Jelly Bean please do not be hurt that Ravi has totally forgotten the plot line of your Garden of Eden saga in which Xeno was NOT the one with whom I was cavorting in the bushes. Obviously the San Diego sun and southern CA ambiance has addled his brain, which he, meaning Ravi of course, doesn't even like us to talk about! His brain I mean. Neuroscience and all that bullocks. Anyway, more evidence of this addling is his being stuck in the past with talk of psychological rape and inauthenticity. Dear LOJB, isn't that just so so LAST year?! And all the effing this and effing that. One is sorely tempted to urge Nephew to get some new material for gosh sakes! It's a new year. Even in Western astrology. Even in the Chinese system. It's a new season. It's almost a new month. Get with the new program, Newphew! Sorry couldn't resist that lame pun smiley faces all around. From: Ravi Chivukula To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:20 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only] "Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to ask you and Share to take your orgies offline. Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote: > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > >> Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it >> longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was >> randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to >> do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often >> sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take in >> half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors >> already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a >> computer to do it FOR me! > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and well designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of Robin's was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far too much. Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. Some manual editing might be needed. The software works better if the original document has a well defined structure. > >'HOW IT WORKS' > >'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of >each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence based >on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The most >important sentence is deemed to be the sentence with the highest frequency >count.' > >'Obviously, human readers may disagree with this automated approach to text >summarization. Automated text summarization works best on expository text such >as textbooks and reference material (non-fiction). The results can be skewed >when a passage has only a few sentences. Text Compactor is not recommended for >use with fiction (i.e., stories about imaginary people, places, events).' > >As the result with that post was not particularly good, I conclude Robin and >his exposition is the result of an imaginary person writing about imaginary >places and events, though Ann and Curtis seem reasonably real. But of course I >can't be sure. Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me. > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
A blast from the past - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300308 (for the clueless doctordumbass = futur.musik) On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:49 PM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com < no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > ** > > > The monkey, the mannequin, and the squeeze toy. Funny to see Boy Scientist > Curtis in his lab coat, railing at the podium one minute, and then when the > subject changes to interpersonal dynamics, he is suddenly dumb as a post. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula > wrote: > > > > His Holiness must be just chilling out yeah? In a jovial, playful mood? > Sweet to see his antics. > > > > Because applying your disinterested, impartial POV persona I'm able to > gather a lot of information even from that compacted text. > > > > I won't be waiting for yours and Guru Xeno's disinterested, impartial > analysis though because we know your personas and your target, captive > audience. > > > > > > On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "curtisdeltablues" > wrote: > > > > > Hilarious, what a project. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > wrote: > > > > > > > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and > Ann's comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the > remainder by about 50%. This is the result: > > > > > > > > Robin: > > > > > > > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you > trapped inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited > for ends which falsify why it exists.' > > > > > > > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and > Robin; "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person > he does not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry > does demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is > subjectively reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your > representation of what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis > was and made it over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there > was hardly anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all > interested in anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. > "Funny thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the saying > of it.' > > > > > > > > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' > > > > > > > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed > AWB to fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has > not been informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what > AWB declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you > have sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' > > > > > > > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my > analysis, Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not > give you that opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus > operandi.' > > > > > > > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have > this tacit pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or > handshakes): You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all > times.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
"Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me." Thank you Guru Xeno - this is what I like about you. You are at least honest - and admit you are a cold-hearted, emotionless, distant, dead man basically, of dead beliefs, of inane platitudes - having sexual orgies in your mind with words, even your hard-ons while you are having sex with words might be just a word in your mind called "hard-on". It really reflects in your writing - everytime I read you it's astonishing, it's as if you are a zombie. And then equally hilarious is when I see someone like Share react to you - it's as if she actually had sex with you and you made her come. I'm always tempted to ask you and Share to take your orgies offline. Hail to Guru Zombie Xeno !!! On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius < anartax...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ** > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > > > Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made > it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to > do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often > sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take > in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors > already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a > computer to do it FOR me! > > This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and > well designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of > Robin's was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far > too much. Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. > Some manual editing might be needed. The software works better if the > original document has a well defined structure. > > 'HOW IT WORKS' > > 'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of > each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence > based on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The > most important sentence is deemed to be the sentence with the highest > frequency count.' > > 'Obviously, human readers may disagree with this automated approach to > text summarization. Automated text summarization works best on expository > text such as textbooks and reference material (non-fiction). The results > can be skewed when a passage has only a few sentences. Text Compactor is > not recommended for use with fiction (i.e., stories about imaginary people, > places, events).' > > As the result with that post was not particularly good, I conclude Robin > and his exposition is the result of an imaginary person writing about > imaginary places and events, though Ann and Curtis seem reasonably real. > But of course I can't be sure. Everyone on this forum is just text on a > screen to me. > > >
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it > longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was > randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to do > this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often sloppy > or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take in half of > what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors already and I > don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a computer to do it > FOR me! This kind of software is designed to produce 'executive summaries', and well designed programs do not use random selection. However the sample of Robin's was huge, and the compression was to about 5% which is really far too much. Normally you get reasonable results with 25% to 50% compression. Some manual editing might be needed. The software works better if the original document has a well defined structure. 'HOW IT WORKS' 'After text is placed on the page, the web app calculates the frequency of each word in the passage. Then, a score is calculated for each sentence based on the frequency count associated with the words it contains. The most important sentence is deemed to be the sentence with the highest frequency count.' 'Obviously, human readers may disagree with this automated approach to text summarization. Automated text summarization works best on expository text such as textbooks and reference material (non-fiction). The results can be skewed when a passage has only a few sentences. Text Compactor is not recommended for use with fiction (i.e., stories about imaginary people, places, events).' As the result with that post was not particularly good, I conclude Robin and his exposition is the result of an imaginary person writing about imaginary places and events, though Ann and Curtis seem reasonably real. But of course I can't be sure. Everyone on this forum is just text on a screen to me.
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" wrote: > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and Ann's > comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the > remainder by about 50%. This is the result: > > Robin: > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you trapped > inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited for ends > which falsify why it exists.' > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and Robin; > "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person he does > not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry does > demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is subjectively > reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your representation of > what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis was and made it > over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there was hardly > anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all interested in > anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. "Funny > thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the saying of it.' > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed AWB to > fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has not been > informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what AWB > declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you have > sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my analysis, > Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not give you that > opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus operandi.' > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have this tacit > pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or handshakes): > You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all times.' Ok, that was silly. I went to your link and typed in some text. I made it longer and played with the percentage to keep or edit. All it did was randomly leave in or take out stuff. I don't get why you need a program to do this. Many of us do it naturally by the way we read, which is often sloppy or, because of pre-conceived notions about things, we fail to take in half of what anyone is actually saying. All of us are text compactors already and I don't think it benefits us all that much. I don't require a computer to do it FOR me! >
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
The monkey, the mannequin, and the squeeze toy. Funny to see Boy Scientist Curtis in his lab coat, railing at the podium one minute, and then when the subject changes to interpersonal dynamics, he is suddenly dumb as a post. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > His Holiness must be just chilling out yeah? In a jovial, playful mood? Sweet > to see his antics. > > Because applying your disinterested, impartial POV persona I'm able to gather > a lot of information even from that compacted text. > > I won't be waiting for yours and Guru Xeno's disinterested, impartial > analysis though because we know your personas and your target, captive > audience. > > > On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "curtisdeltablues" wrote: > > > Hilarious, what a project. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > wrote: > > > > > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and Ann's > > > comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor > > > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I > > > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced > > > the remainder by about 50%. This is the result: > > > > > > Robin: > > > > > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you trapped > > > inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited for ends > > > which falsify why it exists.' > > > > > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and > > > Robin; "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a > > > person he does not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of > > > A, Barry does demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she > > > is subjectively reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your > > > representation of what I said about Barry (you took over what that > > > analysis was and made it over into your own image of what you wanted it > > > to be: there was hardly anything left of it after that) indicate you were > > > at all interested in anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my > > > analysis. "Funny thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away > > > in the saying of it.' > > > > > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' > > > > > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed AWB > > > to fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has not > > > been informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what > > > AWB declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you > > > have sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' > > > > > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my analysis, > > > Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not give you > > > that opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus > > > operandi.' > > > > > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have this > > > tacit pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or > > > handshakes): You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all > > > times.' > > > > > > > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
His Holiness must be just chilling out yeah? In a jovial, playful mood? Sweet to see his antics. Because applying your disinterested, impartial POV persona I'm able to gather a lot of information even from that compacted text. I won't be waiting for yours and Guru Xeno's disinterested, impartial analysis though because we know your personas and your target, captive audience. On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "curtisdeltablues" wrote: > Hilarious, what a project. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > wrote: > > > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and Ann's > > comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor > > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I > > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the > > remainder by about 50%. This is the result: > > > > Robin: > > > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you trapped > > inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited for ends > > which falsify why it exists.' > > > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and Robin; > > "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person he does > > not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry does > > demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is subjectively > > reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your representation of > > what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis was and made it > > over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there was hardly > > anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all interested in > > anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. "Funny > > thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the saying of it.' > > > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' > > > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed AWB to > > fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has not been > > informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what AWB > > declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you have > > sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' > > > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my analysis, > > Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not give you > > that opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus operandi.' > > > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have this > > tacit pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or > > handshakes): You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all > > times.' > > > >
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
Hilarious, what a project. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" wrote: > > I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and Ann's > comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor > http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I > split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the > remainder by about 50%. This is the result: > > Robin: > > 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you trapped > inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited for ends > which falsify why it exists.' > > 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and Robin; > "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person he does > not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry does > demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is subjectively > reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your representation of > what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis was and made it > over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there was hardly > anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all interested in > anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. "Funny > thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the saying of it.' > > 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' > > 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed AWB to > fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has not been > informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what AWB > declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you have > sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' > > 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my analysis, > Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not give you that > opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus operandi.' > > 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have this tacit > pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or handshakes): > You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all times.' >
[FairfieldLife] Cliff Notes Robin [previously Re: Men only]
I took Robin's last post to Curtis and removed all of Curtis' and Ann's comments and pasted all of Robin's posts into the text compactor http://www.textcompactor.com/ and it choked, the text was too long. So I split it into two sections, reduced the length to 10% and then reduced the remainder by about 50%. This is the result: Robin: 'No, you will scrupulously avoid this, because it might get you trapped inside where truth is--truth which does not wish to be exploited for ends which falsify why it exists.' 'You are saying here, Curtis, that Barry formed a dislike for A and Robin; "So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, a person he does not respect"--meaning: A fails to realize that, outside of A, Barry does demonstrate vulnerability--but A can't see this because she is subjectively reacting to Barry's dislike of her. You did not in your representation of what I said about Barry (you took over what that analysis was and made it over into your own image of what you wanted it to be: there was hardly anything left of it after that) indicate you were at all interested in anything but defending Barry and getting rid of my analysis. "Funny thing"--it starts off as a cliché, and just dies away in the saying of it.' 'Ann has done her best to be fair and just to Barry here, Curtis.' 'If you really did possess such a perspective, why have you allowed AWB to fall into such ignorance about Barry, because her perspective has not been informed by your own (re: Barry Wright)? So I conclude: Yes, what AWB declares about Barry's predictability is unassailable--and only you have sealed this by how you have responded to this assertion, Curtis.' 'I have analyzed the "Limited" character of Barry Wright in my analysis, Curtis. And that's not going to happen, because Barry would not give you that opportunity, and neither will your experience or your modus operandi.' 'The point Ann is making here, Curtis, is that you and Barry have this tacit pact (I assume it has not been ritualized through ceremony or handshakes): You have my back; You have my back; I have your back--at all times.'
