Re: WLM : multiple periods not recommended for batch - why?
interesting topic.. I also wonder on if those service classes that are not active (no rules,no workload assigned) will cause WLM overhead? If no, then the suggested total number of sc/periods are for active ones only.. any document supporting this? -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Any SMF Cut for MVS Commands "cancel"
any clue in netlog? On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Ravi Gaur wrote: > We have had a situation where somebody cancelled a job which caused IMS > left in middle and later issue now we tried finding who issued it however > it got just INTERNAL (Generally something coming from console) anybody know > any other pin to go back to root who issued it..another thing I could > notice is command seems to be coming thru netview.. > > 12114 14:46:37.86 INTERNAL 0290 CANCEL STLD3VDC,A=025B > 12114 14:46:37.90 STC12398 0290 CANCEL STLD3VDC,A=025B > > STC12398 = Netview task.. > > Now SMF30 doesn't contain any info neither 26 ..Syslog doesn't got > anything Netview log got only command as pasted here...any call? > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IDCAMS APF auth question.
Hi. z/OS DFSMS Access Method Services for Catalogs: Chapter 4. ALLOCATE: Access method services identifies the verb name ALLOCATE and attaches the terminal monitor program (TMP) that runs Time Sharing Option (TSO) commands in the background. The ALLOCATE command *should be used only to allocate new data sets to the job step*. If you use ALLOCATE through access method services for anything else (the handling of SYSOUT data sets, for example), you can get unpredictable results. Refer to z/OS TSO/E Programming Guide for additional information on using this command. Table 2 on page 29 separates the parameters to that you should use under access method services from the parameters that cause unpredictable results. HTH.. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:50 AM, John McKown wrote: > I am writing a program which will ATTACH IDCAMS to do some things. I > have been reading: > http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2I2A0/D.1 > which goes over the commands which require APF authorization. I have one > question that perhaps someone here knows the answer to. The above > states: > > An address space that calls IDCAMS to issue any of these commands must > be APF authorized, or the command will terminate: > > * ALLOCATE command to allocate an SMS-managed data set > > > What is the meaning of the second "allocate" in that sentence? Does it > mean "create" as in "allocate a new" or does it mean the more generic > "allocate" as in "do a dynamic allocation" even if the dataset already > exists? > > I know, "try it and see". When I get to that point, I will. I'm writing > a UNIX command (in HLASM) which runs IDCAMS from a UNIX shell prompt. > I'm still in the design stage on what I want it to "look like" in terms > of options and arguments. > > -- > John McKown > Maranatha! <>< > > ------ > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Omegamon II for MVS- Pass alerts to console
Hi List, I want to pass Omon/MVS threshold or alert message to operator console (or maybe syslog), in order to trigger some automation actions. I've configured "Enable WTO messages" from default "NO" to "YES" and rebuilt the RTE.. However, I can not see alerts message in console. We have several testing threshold setting in Omon/MVS panel, like CPU over 95% busy.. PAGE DS over 70% full.. etc.. Did I missing something here, pls share some idea . Thanks a lot! -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: WLM Classification Rules question
��z{S���}�ĝ��xjǺ�*'���O*^��m��Z�w!j�
Re: Auto-purge of Jobs
��z{S���}�ĝ��xjǺ�*'���O*^��m��Z�w!j�
Re: DUMPSRV - EXCP count high
As DUMPSRV is system task, the CPU-TIME should be the accumulate value since IPL.. So, depends on how long it has been running. On another hand, simply calculate the per EXCP using CPU second, result in 0.143ms/EXCP, looks good to me. I have no idea which column in SDSF with mentioned value "PROT'? On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:40 AM, jagadishan perumal wrote: > Hi experts, > > In one of our Test system the DUMPSRV's CPU and EXCP counts are really > high. > Are there any ways to reduce the EXCP count since the system performance is > really slow. I took the below information after analysing each EXCP and CPU > time and found DUMPSRV had really a high values interms of EXCP-Cnt and CPU > -time. > > Any thoughts or suggestions will help me in analysing more. Please guide or > provide me a reference to analyse more on the below. If anyone can provide > me a diagnostic guide or reference online that will be really helpful > > JOBNAME CPU% ASID ASIDX EXCP-Cnt CPU-Time > DUMPSRV 0.0050005 7109245 1014.58 > > Also, I was able to see that SYSLOGD1 status shows as "PROT" . I was trying > to search for a similar problems in google, but I could'nt get similar HITS > to analyse. > > SYSLOGD1 0.00 31 001F 237 5.18PROT > > Regards, > Jags > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: IOPS benchmark
Hi Alex, You should combine the DASD response time with I/O rate when you check your DASD's performance. And see how is the I/O intensity during your batch window.. On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Hal Merritt wrote: > In modern DASD, 3390-3, 3390-9, 3390-whatever are just logical constructs. > > More, hopefully most all of the I/O looks like it is directed to a volume, > but actually is satisfied in cache or buffers and never really touches the > physical disk. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Alex Wang > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 5:02 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: IOPS benchmark > > Hi All, > > We are now evluating the IOPS for some DASD (3390-3 and 3390-9). Because > the DASD are shared by all LPARs in the sysplex. As per RMF IO activity, > there are a few DASDs which were accessed 2000 per second at a specific > time. We are afraid there may be hotpot problem occur in the near future. > > Is there any reference which clearly states the benchmark or thredhold for > the IBM DASD (3390-3 and 3390-9)? The DASD IOPS may be 300 at a specific > time in the sysplex. Is it acceptable or do we need to tune that DASD? > > Looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks! > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the > archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are > intended > exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The > message, > together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged > information. > Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or > distribution > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please > immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: can limit JES2 RJE work?
Tested COMPRESS=NO Tested different CKPTPAGE and CKPTLINE.. NO luck.. On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Cobe Xu wrote: > Hi Jack, > > As previous thread mentioned, COMPRESS could be the cause of some CPU > cycles. > So we're going to test turn off COMPRESS, will see if JES2 cpu can relief.. > Thanks! > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Jack Schudel wrote: > >> Cobe Xu: >> >> Have you checked to make sure that both compression and compaction are >> turned off for the printer? >> (Do a $DU,Rn.PRn command and look for CMPCT=NO,COMPRESS=NO.) >> By default JES2's RJE printer driver scans for repeated characters to >> compress out of the data stream. >> That made a lot of sense back in the days of 4800 bit/sec modems, but is >> probably just wasted cycles with today's communication speeds. >> >> If that does not help, you will need to find a way to move the printer >> driver out of your main JES2 task. >> Are you running multiple MVS images sharing the JES2 spool? >> Can you connect the printer to JES2 on one of the images that is not >> running CICS as its primary workload? >> >> If you are constrained to a single MVS image things get more complicated. >> One approach would be to run a secondary JES2 subsystem to drive the >> printer, and define that JES2 subsystem with a lower WLM importance. >> The secondary JES2 could share your main spool, or you could run an NJE >> connection between the primary and secondary. >> >> If CICS really is your most important workload, and you have controls in >> place to prevent runaway transactions, some sites have even gone so far as >> running their primary JES2 system at a lower importance than CICS. >> Personally I don't think that is a wise thing to do, but it really does >> depend on the environment. >> >> Good luck! >> >> >> /jack >> >> >> >> >> - Original Message - From: "Cobe Xu" >> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main >> >> To: >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:54 AM >> Subject: Re: can limit JES2 RJE work? >> >> >> Hi Greg, >>> >>> Thanks for the APAR information. >>> I checked with JES2 PERFDATA(PCESTAT). We don't have high cpu% for SAPI, >>> but >>> true for RMT.PRT PCE, over 50%. >>> Need to further confirm if our problem match this APAR. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Greg Shirey >>> wrote: >>> >>> Could it be APAR OA33407? >>>> >>>> >>>> * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: High CPU usage for output device PCEs, * >>>> * such as SAPI PCEs, when selecting work * >>>> * with user routing. * >>>> >>>> * RECOMMENDATION: * >>>> >>>> The WSROUT routine in HASPSERV is not distinguishing between a >>>> real JOE and an artificial JOE (JOA). So it incorrectly >>>> determines for a JOA that it cannot utilize the user routing >>>> information to do work selection, so significantly more devices >>>> are posted than should be. When the device attempts to do work >>>> selection it cannot find JOEs that match. This incorrect >>>> processing results in excessive CPU usage. >>>> This problem affects the following output devices when they >>>> select work with user routing: printers, punches, SYSOUT >>>> transmitters, and SYSOUT API (SAPI). >>>> >>>> Greg Shirey >>>> Ben E. Keith Company >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - Original Message - >>>> From: "Cobe Xu" >>>> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu >>>> >>>> Recently, we have a problem when sending large amount spool files (about >>>> 2.5 >>>> million lines) to RJE printer, as the work caused JES2 consumes lots of >>>> CPU, >>>> therefore impacted >>>> the CICS online performance. >>>> We consider to limit JES2 address space CPU, using WLM resource group, >>>> but >>>> this will suppress other JES2 process as well. So, any idea to limit RJE >>>> work only? >>>> Thanks a lo
Re: can limit JES2 RJE work?
Hi Jack, As previous thread mentioned, COMPRESS could be the cause of some CPU cycles. So we're going to test turn off COMPRESS, will see if JES2 cpu can relief.. Thanks! On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Jack Schudel wrote: > Cobe Xu: > > Have you checked to make sure that both compression and compaction are > turned off for the printer? > (Do a $DU,Rn.PRn command and look for CMPCT=NO,COMPRESS=NO.) > By default JES2's RJE printer driver scans for repeated characters to > compress out of the data stream. > That made a lot of sense back in the days of 4800 bit/sec modems, but is > probably just wasted cycles with today's communication speeds. > > If that does not help, you will need to find a way to move the printer > driver out of your main JES2 task. > Are you running multiple MVS images sharing the JES2 spool? > Can you connect the printer to JES2 on one of the images that is not > running CICS as its primary workload? > > If you are constrained to a single MVS image things get more complicated. > One approach would be to run a secondary JES2 subsystem to drive the > printer, and define that JES2 subsystem with a lower WLM importance. > The secondary JES2 could share your main spool, or you could run an NJE > connection between the primary and secondary. > > If CICS really is your most important workload, and you have controls in > place to prevent runaway transactions, some sites have even gone so far as > running their primary JES2 system at a lower importance than CICS. > Personally I don't think that is a wise thing to do, but it really does > depend on the environment. > > Good luck! > > > /jack > > > > > - Original Message - From: "Cobe Xu" > Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main > > To: > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:54 AM > Subject: Re: can limit JES2 RJE work? > > > Hi Greg, >> >> Thanks for the APAR information. >> I checked with JES2 PERFDATA(PCESTAT). We don't have high cpu% for SAPI, >> but >> true for RMT.PRT PCE, over 50%. >> Need to further confirm if our problem match this APAR. >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Greg Shirey >> wrote: >> >> Could it be APAR OA33407? >>> >>> >>> * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: High CPU usage for output device PCEs, * >>> * such as SAPI PCEs, when selecting work * >>> * with user routing. * >>> >>> * RECOMMENDATION: * >>> >>> The WSROUT routine in HASPSERV is not distinguishing between a >>> real JOE and an artificial JOE (JOA). So it incorrectly >>> determines for a JOA that it cannot utilize the user routing >>> information to do work selection, so significantly more devices >>> are posted than should be. When the device attempts to do work >>> selection it cannot find JOEs that match. This incorrect >>> processing results in excessive CPU usage. >>> This problem affects the following output devices when they >>> select work with user routing: printers, punches, SYSOUT >>> transmitters, and SYSOUT API (SAPI). >>> >>> Greg Shirey >>> Ben E. Keith Company >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Cobe Xu" >>> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu >>> >>> Recently, we have a problem when sending large amount spool files (about >>> 2.5 >>> million lines) to RJE printer, as the work caused JES2 consumes lots of >>> CPU, >>> therefore impacted >>> the CICS online performance. >>> We consider to limit JES2 address space CPU, using WLM resource group, >>> but >>> this will suppress other JES2 process as well. So, any idea to limit RJE >>> work only? >>> Thanks a lot! >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cobe Xu >> >> Best Regards >> --- >> z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst >> z/OS System Programmer >> Email: cob...@gmail.com >> --- >> > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- *"Impart fishing is much better than just donate fishes"* -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: can limit JES2 RJE work?
Hi Greg, Thanks for the APAR information. I checked with JES2 PERFDATA(PCESTAT). We don't have high cpu% for SAPI, but true for RMT.PRT PCE, over 50%. Need to further confirm if our problem match this APAR. On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Greg Shirey wrote: > Could it be APAR OA33407? > > > * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: High CPU usage for output device PCEs, * > * such as SAPI PCEs, when selecting work * > * with user routing. * > > * RECOMMENDATION: * > > The WSROUT routine in HASPSERV is not distinguishing between a > real JOE and an artificial JOE (JOA). So it incorrectly > determines for a JOA that it cannot utilize the user routing > information to do work selection, so significantly more devices > are posted than should be. When the device attempts to do work > selection it cannot find JOEs that match. This incorrect > processing results in excessive CPU usage. > This problem affects the following output devices when they > select work with user routing: printers, punches, SYSOUT > transmitters, and SYSOUT API (SAPI). > > Greg Shirey > Ben E. Keith Company > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Cobe Xu" > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > Recently, we have a problem when sending large amount spool files (about > 2.5 > million lines) to RJE printer, as the work caused JES2 consumes lots of > CPU, > therefore impacted > the CICS online performance. > We consider to limit JES2 address space CPU, using WLM resource group, but > this will suppress other JES2 process as well. So, any idea to limit RJE > work only? > Thanks a lot! > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- *"Impart fishing is much better than just donate fishes"* -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: can limit JES2 RJE work?
Hi Ulrich, We set CKPTLINE=66,CKPTPAGE=100 (default), then CheckPoint Intveral = 66 * 100 = 6600 lines. Say we have 2.5 million lines printed (in 5 mins interval), then checkpoint count = 378. Does it counts ? to spike up JES2 cpu? On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Ulrich Krueger wrote: > Cobe, > I'm just guessing, but ... > I suspect that the spike in JES2 activity while transmitting your large > report could be due to frequent JES2 Checkpoint activity, especially if you > are transmitting over a high-speed line. You might want to review your > settings of CKPTLINE and CKPTPAGE and see if that can reduce your JES2 > activity spike. > See > > http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/HAS2A480/3.59.2?S > HELF=EZ2ZBK0G&DT=2008060206 > > Another option that could cause CPU usage is the COMPRESS option on this > printer. Perhaps turning it off can improve things. > > You might also want to look at other JES2 parameters in your configuration > that deal with RJE and see if you have any bottlenecks there. > > Regards, > Ulrich Krueger > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf > Of Cobe Xu > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 3:29 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: can limit JES2 RJE work? > > Hi Ravi, > > I checked our config, we do use default setting for LIMIT=(0,*). [shown > below] > As we do need all the records to be processed, but hope to slow down the > transmition.. > $HASP603 R44.PR1 > $HASP603 R44.PR1 STATUS=INACTIVE,ASIS=YES,CCTL=YES,CKPTLINE=66, > $HASP603 CKPTPAGE=100,CMPCT=NO,COMPRESS=YES,CREATOR=, > $HASP603 DEVFCB=,EJECT=YES,FCB=6,FCBLOAD=NO,FORMS=(STD, > $HASP603 ,,),JOBNAME=,LIMIT=(0,*),LRECL=255, > $HASP603 NEWPAGE=DEFAULT,PLIM=(0,0),PRMODE=(LINE), > $HASP603 PRWIDTH=255,QUEUE=A,RANGE=(J1,99), > $HASP603 ROUTECDE=(P044),SELECT=PRINT1,SEP=NO,SEPDS=NO, > $HASP603 SETUP=HALT,SPACE=,SUSPEND=YES,TRACE=NO, > $HASP603 TRANS=NO,UCS=0(STD),VOLUME=(,,,),WRITER=, > $HASP603 WS=(W,Q,R,PRM,LIM/F) > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Ravi Gaur wrote: > > > I am not sure the scope of your question is it just limited to Printer or > > extend > > to Remote node job submission and getting output... > > > > Certainly RACF may have option for it ..however 1 of the inscope task > with > > printers would be to limit the Lower and Higher records limit with Limit > > parameter in Printer..as below.. > > > > $DPRT78 > > $HASP603 PRT78 > > $HASP603 PRT78 UNIT=,STATUS=DRAINED,BURST=NO,CKPTLINE=0, > > $HASP603 CKPTMODE=PAGE,CKPTPAGE=100,CKPTSEC=0, > > $HASP603 CREATOR=,DEVFCB=,DEVFLASH=,FCB=SB08, > > $HASP603 FORMS=(STD,,,),FSS=SARFVC78,HONORTRC=YES, > > $HASP603 JOBNAME=,LASTFORM=STD,LIMIT=(0,*), > > $HASP603 COPYMARK=DATASET,MARK=NO,MODE=FSS, > > $HASP603 NEWPAGE=DEFAULT,NPRO=300,PAUSE=NO,PLIM=(0,*), > > $HASP603 PRESELCT=YES,PRMODE=(LINE),QUEUE=G,RANGE=(J1, > > $HASP603 99),ROUTECDE=(LOCAL),SEP=NO, > > $HASP603 SEPCHARS=DEFAULT,SEPDS=NO,SETUP=HALT,SPACE=, > > $HASP603 TRACE=NO,TRANS=DEFAULT,TRKCELL=NO,UCS=GY15, > > $HASP603 UCSVERFY=NO,VOLUME=(,,,),WRITER=, > > $HASP603 WS=(PRM,Q,R/),FSAROLTR=YES > > > > > > LIMIT > >Specifies the lower and upper record limits for jobs that this device > >will process. A limit of (0,*) means that this device selects all > >output. > > > >This keyword only applies for local and remote printers and punches > >and SYSOUT transmitters. > > > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > > > > > -- > Cobe Xu > > Best Regards > --- > z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst > z/OS System Programmer > Email: cob...@gmail.com > --- > *"Impart fishing is much better than just donate fishes"* > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at ht
Re: can limit JES2 RJE work?
Hi Ravi, I checked our config, we do use default setting for LIMIT=(0,*). [shown below] As we do need all the records to be processed, but hope to slow down the transmition.. $HASP603 R44.PR1 $HASP603 R44.PR1 STATUS=INACTIVE,ASIS=YES,CCTL=YES,CKPTLINE=66, $HASP603 CKPTPAGE=100,CMPCT=NO,COMPRESS=YES,CREATOR=, $HASP603 DEVFCB=,EJECT=YES,FCB=6,FCBLOAD=NO,FORMS=(STD, $HASP603 ,,),JOBNAME=,LIMIT=(0,*),LRECL=255, $HASP603 NEWPAGE=DEFAULT,PLIM=(0,0),PRMODE=(LINE), $HASP603 PRWIDTH=255,QUEUE=A,RANGE=(J1,99), $HASP603 ROUTECDE=(P044),SELECT=PRINT1,SEP=NO,SEPDS=NO, $HASP603 SETUP=HALT,SPACE=,SUSPEND=YES,TRACE=NO, $HASP603 TRANS=NO,UCS=0(STD),VOLUME=(,,,),WRITER=, $HASP603 WS=(W,Q,R,PRM,LIM/F) On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Ravi Gaur wrote: > I am not sure the scope of your question is it just limited to Printer or > extend > to Remote node job submission and getting output... > > Certainly RACF may have option for it ..however 1 of the inscope task with > printers would be to limit the Lower and Higher records limit with Limit > parameter in Printer..as below.. > > $DPRT78 > $HASP603 PRT78 > $HASP603 PRT78 UNIT=,STATUS=DRAINED,BURST=NO,CKPTLINE=0, > $HASP603 CKPTMODE=PAGE,CKPTPAGE=100,CKPTSEC=0, > $HASP603 CREATOR=,DEVFCB=,DEVFLASH=,FCB=SB08, > $HASP603 FORMS=(STD,,,),FSS=SARFVC78,HONORTRC=YES, > $HASP603 JOBNAME=,LASTFORM=STD,LIMIT=(0,*), > $HASP603 COPYMARK=DATASET,MARK=NO,MODE=FSS, > $HASP603 NEWPAGE=DEFAULT,NPRO=300,PAUSE=NO,PLIM=(0,*), > $HASP603 PRESELCT=YES,PRMODE=(LINE),QUEUE=G,RANGE=(J1, > $HASP603 99),ROUTECDE=(LOCAL),SEP=NO, > $HASP603 SEPCHARS=DEFAULT,SEPDS=NO,SETUP=HALT,SPACE=, > $HASP603 TRACE=NO,TRANS=DEFAULT,TRKCELL=NO,UCS=GY15, > $HASP603 UCSVERFY=NO,VOLUME=(,,,),WRITER=, > $HASP603 WS=(PRM,Q,R/),FSAROLTR=YES > > > LIMIT >Specifies the lower and upper record limits for jobs that this device >will process. A limit of (0,*) means that this device selects all >output. > >This keyword only applies for local and remote printers and punches >and SYSOUT transmitters. > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- *"Impart fishing is much better than just donate fishes"* -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
can limit JES2 RJE work?
Hi list, Recently, we have a problem when sending large amount spool files (about 2.5 million lines) to RJE printer, as the work caused JES2 consumes lots of CPU, therefore impacted the CICS online performance. We consider to limit JES2 address space CPU, using WLM resource group, but this will suppress other JES2 process as well. So, any idea to limit RJE work only? Thanks a lot! -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Omon/Epilog question
Hi list, How to use archived EDS (regardless active ones in EDSLIST) when involve EPILOG in batch mode? In panel mode, I know DAT ADD and DAT USE command can help. Many thanks! -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- *"Impart fishing is much better than just donate fishes"* -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DFDSS copy
Why don't try DUMP/RESTORE process...? On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Matan Cohen wrote: > Hi, > > for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files > are DB2 VSAMS) . > i noticed there is a multivolume DSNs so i added the 'SPHERE' & > 'SELECTMULTI' . > > so after backing up the disk i run this JCL : > //ADB2CPY JOB ,,CLASS=A,REGION=0M,MSGCLASS=X, > //MSGLEVEL=(1,1) > //BFFDBB29 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU > //SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=* > //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* > //DASDDD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=,DISP=SHR > //OUTDSK DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=,DISP=SHR > //SYSINDD * > COPY DATASET( - > INCLUDE( DBP.**, - > DBT.**,- > DB29.**, - > ))- > LOGINDDNAME(DASD)- > OUTDDNAM(OUTDSK) - > SPHERE- > SELECTMULTI(ANY) - > CAT - > DELETE > /* > > for some reason half of the Files (not necessarliy multivolume) were not > copied the job ended with RC 0 it seems DFDSS didn't select them , > from the literature: > "For VSAM data sets, the volume list is affected by the use of the > SPHERE keyword as follows: > v Specify SPHERE and you only need to list any part of the base > cluster in the volume list." > > should I run this job again but without : 'SPHERE','SELECTMULTI' ? > is there somthing I forgetten ? > > " > -- > best regards, > matan cohen > MF System Administrator. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst z/OS System Programmer Email: cob...@gmail.com --- *"Impart fishing is much better than just donate fishes"* -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC?
Response to "what am I trying to do?", I'm working on a yearly performance & capacity review, and saw many many occasions that CPU overshoot the CAP line about 3%. And I try to figure this out. Thanks all, will check the PR/SM manual for the 1~3% saying. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Al Sherkow wrote: > That 3% is not unexpected. WLM works with PR/SM to implement the cap. WLM > does the math and PR/SM does the actually "capping". If you read the PR/SM > planning guides (as Peter referenced) you'll see that PR/SM manages LPARs > to +- > 3 percent. > > I believe that WLM does the calculation to account for the possible MINUS > 3%. If > you were trying to cap at 100 MSUs and you only got 97 MSUs while paying > for > 100 you would be upset. If you pay for 100MSUs and get 3 Bonus MSUs you are > a > satisfied customer. (I chose 100 MSUs to make the math easy) > > Al Sherkow, I/S Management Strategies, Ltd. > Consulting Expertise on Capacity Planning, Performance Tuning, > WLC, LPARs, IRD and LCS Software > Seminars on IBM SW Pricing, LPARs, and IRD > Voice: +1 414 332-3062 > Web: www.sherkow.com > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC?
Hi Tom, thanks for reply. yes, I know the weight value is absolutely different thing to MIPS... But fact is, we do use the *number* as "Initial Processing Weight". The calculation is: we need 24 MSU out of 26, the rate is about 93%. And in terms of MIPS, our 26 MSU is about 170 MIPS. So, we put the weight to SYS2 as 160. ( 170*93%), and the dummy LP weight 10. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Kelman, Tom wrote: > Cobe, > > You do have me a little confused when you talk about capping at 24 MSUs > and setting the WEIGHT (which I assume is the LPAR weighting factor) to > 160. These are different. Also, the LPAR weighting factor is just a > relative number. It does not relate to MIPS. > > As far as the LPAR going over the cap in any given interval, that can > occur as long as the MSU four hour rolling average (4HRA) remains below > the cap. It is when the 4HRA hits the cap that you'll see the peaks > chopped off. Once the 4HRA falls below the cap the system can once > again spike up above that. If you have a cap set, and you are on > sub-capacity pricing, IBM's software charges for the sub-capacity priced > software will be based on the highest 4HRA for the month, but will never > exceed the cap. Actually, if you are not using sub-capacity pricing for > your software, I can't think of any reason to set a cap. > > Tom Kelman > Capacity Planning > Commerce Bank, Kansas City > > > -Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Cobe Xu > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 5:00 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC? > > Hi list, > We aim to cap the only active LPAR on the CEC(26 MSU) to 24 MSU. > But, I'm a bit confuse when I checked the RMF CPU Activity report as > below, > which shows that with the interval, SYS2 was able to use up to 25 MSU. > (Highlighted) > So my questions are: > 1. Is this because CPU capping is not working for only one active LPAR > on > the CEC? If it's the case, any reference? > 2. Or, this is related to the WEIGHT value we used to CAP? in our case, > we > reference our CEC capacity is 26 MSU (about 171 MIPS), target to CAP 24 > MSU > (160 MIPS). > . But, for client's sake, we use MIPS value as the WEIGHT,i.e 160. (as > highlighted in the report). And, this mislead the Lpar scheduler that it > is > over 100% of the CEC. Thus, > SYS2 can use as much as it needs. > 3. Or any other posibility? > Pls shed some light, thanks a lot! > > > > PAGE2 >z/OS V1R8SYSTEM ID SYS2 START > 08/17/2010-03.00.00 INTERVAL 000.59.59 > RPT VERSION V1R8 RMF END > 08/17/2010-04.00.00 CYCLE 0.100 SECONDS > > > MVS PARTITION NAMESYS2NUMBER OF PHYSICAL > PROCESSORS 4 GROUP NAME N/A > IMAGE CAPACITY 24 > CP2 LIMITN/A > NUMBER OF CONFIGURED PARTITIONS 5 > ICF 2 > WAIT COMPLETION > NO > > DISPATCH INTERVAL > DYNAMIC > > - PARTITION DATA - -- LOGICAL PARTITION > PROCESSOR > DATA -- -- AVERAGE PROCESSOR UTILIZATION PERCENTAGES -- > MSU -CAPPING-- PROCESSOR- DISPATCH > TIME > DATA LOGICAL PROCESSORS --- PHYSICAL PROCESSORS --- > NAME S WGT DEFACT DEF WLM% NUM TYPE EFFECTIVE > TOTAL EFFECTIVETOTAL LPAR MGMT EFFECTIVE TOTAL > SYS2 A 1600 25 YES0.02 CP01.55.49.238 > 01.55.53.278 96.5296.57 0.06 96.52 96.57 > SYS6 A100 0 YES0.02 CP00.00.00.000 > 00.00.00.0000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > *PHYSICAL* > 00.00.01.367 0.02 0.02 > > -- -- -- > TOTAL 01.55.49.238 > 01.55.54.645 0.08 96.52 96.59 > > > CFP01AH2 A DED1 ICF 00.59.59.655 > 00.59.59.725 99.9999.99 0.00 50.00 50.00 > CFP02AH2 A DED1 ICF 00.59.59.666 > 00.59.59.708 99.9999.99 0.00 50.00 50.00 > *PHYSICAL* > 00.00.00.422 0.01 0.01 > > --
Re: CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC?
That sounds interesting... I accept Tom's opinion that as long as the 4HRA is lower than the cap, some interval could be ran above the cap. However, in your scenario, if the 4HRA stabilze ABOVE the set defined capacity, it should not be more than 4 intervals, because the 5th interval will be the CAP value. back to our case, we'd like to cap at 24 MSU out of 26, however, when review CPU report, 80% of hourly intervals are about using 25 MSU..there's about 3% more to our expectation. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Al Sherkow wrote: > It is possible for the 4HRA of an LPAR to go above the defined capacity > limit. This > is because the limit goes on typically after four hours of your workload > getting > bigger and bigger. Eventually the 4HRA exceeds the defined capacity and the > cap > goes on. As the four hour rolling average goes forward, the values from 4 > hours > ago, then 3h45m ago, then 3h30m ago are removed from the calculation of > that > average, and values at the capping level are going into the calculation, so > the > 4HRA may keep rising for a few intervals. It may even stabilize above the > set > defined capacity. Back in 2004 I coined the term "bonus MSUs" for these > MSUs > that are above the defined capacity value. When SCRT processes your SMF > data, > if the 4HRA in the data is above the defined capacity value SCRT ignores > those > "bonus MSUs". The Ts&Cs of sub-capacity WLC indicate you will not be > charged > for more MSUs than the Defined Capacity Value. > > Al Sherkow, I/S Management Strategies, Ltd. > Consulting Expertise on Capacity Planning, Performance Tuning, > WLC, LPARs, IRD and LCS Software > Seminars on IBM SW Pricing, LPARs, and IRD > Voice: +1 414 332-3062 > Web: www.sherkow.com > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC?
Hi list, We aim to cap the only active LPAR on the CEC(26 MSU) to 24 MSU. But, I'm a bit confuse when I checked the RMF CPU Activity report as below, which shows that with the interval, SYS2 was able to use up to 25 MSU. (Highlighted) So my questions are: 1. Is this because CPU capping is not working for only one active LPAR on the CEC? If it's the case, any reference? 2. Or, this is related to the WEIGHT value we used to CAP? in our case, we reference our CEC capacity is 26 MSU (about 171 MIPS), target to CAP 24 MSU (160 MIPS). . But, for client's sake, we use MIPS value as the WEIGHT,i.e 160. (as highlighted in the report). And, this mislead the Lpar scheduler that it is over 100% of the CEC. Thus, SYS2 can use as much as it needs. 3. Or any other posibility? Pls shed some light, thanks a lot! PAGE2 z/OS V1R8SYSTEM ID SYS2 START 08/17/2010-03.00.00 INTERVAL 000.59.59 RPT VERSION V1R8 RMF END 08/17/2010-04.00.00 CYCLE 0.100 SECONDS MVS PARTITION NAMESYS2NUMBER OF PHYSICAL PROCESSORS 4 GROUP NAME N/A IMAGE CAPACITY 24 CP2 LIMITN/A NUMBER OF CONFIGURED PARTITIONS 5 ICF 2 WAIT COMPLETION NO DISPATCH INTERVAL DYNAMIC - PARTITION DATA - -- LOGICAL PARTITION PROCESSOR DATA -- -- AVERAGE PROCESSOR UTILIZATION PERCENTAGES -- MSU -CAPPING-- PROCESSOR- DISPATCH TIME DATA LOGICAL PROCESSORS --- PHYSICAL PROCESSORS --- NAME S WGT DEFACT DEF WLM% NUM TYPE EFFECTIVE TOTAL EFFECTIVETOTAL LPAR MGMT EFFECTIVE TOTAL SYS2 A 1600 25 YES0.02 CP01.55.49.238 01.55.53.278 96.5296.57 0.06 96.52 96.57 SYS6 A100 0 YES0.02 CP00.00.00.000 00.00.00.0000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 *PHYSICAL* 00.00.01.367 0.02 0.02 -- -- -- TOTAL 01.55.49.238 01.55.54.645 0.08 96.52 96.59 CFP01AH2 A DED1 ICF 00.59.59.655 00.59.59.725 99.9999.99 0.00 50.00 50.00 CFP02AH2 A DED1 ICF 00.59.59.666 00.59.59.708 99.9999.99 0.00 50.00 50.00 *PHYSICAL* 00.00.00.422 0.01 0.01 -- -- -- TOTAL 01.59.59.321 01.59.59.855 0.01 99.99 100.0 SYS8 -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: EPILOG question
thanks Norman... Just figured out.. I did a silly move that put SYSPRINT DD after RKM2IN DD On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Norman Hollander on DesertWiz < norman.hollan...@desertwiz.biz> wrote: > Have you called support to get help? It may be a known problem, or others > may have > already reported it. > > zNorman > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf > Of Cobe Xu > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 Wednesday 10:40 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: EPILOG question > > Hi list, > We recently upgraded to Omegamon XE v420, everything looks fine, except I > could not gen reports using EPILOG obtain command in batch, which works in > the old version. > The job gets rc 0, but no record printed. While I use EPILOG session > command > line can display information. Any one encounter similar thing? any idea > will > be appriciated. Thanks! > > here is my JCL: > //EXPORT EXEC PGM=KEPOBTN,REGION=4096K,PARM='EPPROD=EP' > //STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.OZOS1.TKANMOD //RKANPAR DD > DISP=SHR,DSN=SYSU.OZOS1.AHD5.RKANPARU > //RKM2OUTR DD SYSOUT=*REPORT LISTING > //RKM2OUTO DD SYSOUT=*OBTAIN MESSAGE LOG > //RKM2OUTM DD SYSOUT=*EPILOG MESSAGE LOG > //OUTREP DD DSN=&&OUTREP,DISP=(NEW,PASS,DELETE),UNIT=3390, > //DCB=(RECFM=VB,LRECL=4096,BLKSIZE=27998),SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)) > //ABNLIGNR DD DUMMY > //RKM2OUTD DD DSN=MYUID.EPILOG.REPORT,DISP=(MOD,CATLG), > // SPACE=(CYL,(2,1)),UNIT=SYSDA, > // DCB=(DSORG=PS,RECFM=V,LRECL=4096) > //RKM2IN DD * > //SYSPRINT DD * > OBTAIN STC(CNMS) INT - > ELEMENTS(SMFID,SDATE,STIME,STCNAME,CPUTRXTM) - > FORMAT(PC) OUTFILE(RKM2OUTD) REPLACE > /* > > -- > Cobe Xu > > Best Regards > --- > zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst > E2E Performance Analyst > Email: cob...@gmail.com > --- > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the > archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
EPILOG question
Hi list, We recently upgraded to Omegamon XE v420, everything looks fine, except I could not gen reports using EPILOG obtain command in batch, which works in the old version. The job gets rc 0, but no record printed. While I use EPILOG session command line can display information. Any one encounter similar thing? any idea will be appriciated. Thanks! here is my JCL: //EXPORT EXEC PGM=KEPOBTN,REGION=4096K,PARM='EPPROD=EP' //STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.OZOS1.TKANMOD //RKANPAR DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYSU.OZOS1.AHD5.RKANPARU //RKM2OUTR DD SYSOUT=*REPORT LISTING //RKM2OUTO DD SYSOUT=*OBTAIN MESSAGE LOG //RKM2OUTM DD SYSOUT=*EPILOG MESSAGE LOG //OUTREP DD DSN=&&OUTREP,DISP=(NEW,PASS,DELETE),UNIT=3390, //DCB=(RECFM=VB,LRECL=4096,BLKSIZE=27998),SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)) //ABNLIGNR DD DUMMY //RKM2OUTD DD DSN=MYUID.EPILOG.REPORT,DISP=(MOD,CATLG), // SPACE=(CYL,(2,1)),UNIT=SYSDA, // DCB=(DSORG=PS,RECFM=V,LRECL=4096) //RKM2IN DD * //SYSPRINT DD * OBTAIN STC(CNMS) INT - ELEMENTS(SMFID,SDATE,STIME,STCNAME,CPUTRXTM) - FORMAT(PC) OUTFILE(RKM2OUTD) REPLACE /* -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
TSO command return code
Hi List, We have a job to issue HDEL from ML1(as below). However, when the last dataset is not found, the step will get rc=14. Then I tried to put TSO command 'TIME' in the last line, but still get rc=14 (when the second last HDEL dataset is not in ML1 or not found). But put HQUERY in the last line can avoid rc14. Only the same kind of command can override previous fail command's rc14? Can anyone shed some light on this? Thanks... //STEP01 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01 //SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSTSIN DD * HDEL A.B.C HDEL A.B.D ...... -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMF data for FTP
DAF mentioned above is good enough More importantno $$$ On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Knutson, Sam wrote: > Take a look at DAF Data Set Audit Facility 1.49 here > http://sites.google.com/site/michaeljosephcleary/home/freeware > > This is an excellent free tool from Mike Cleary which reports on many > types of SMF records including FTP 118/119. > >Best Regards, > >Sam Knutson, GEICO >System z Team Leader >mailto:sknut...@geico.com >(office) 301.986.3574 >(cell) 301.996.1318 > > "Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast..." > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Cynthia Davis > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 8:28 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: SMF data for FTP > > Is there a way to pull 119 records and get more detailed information on > specific > users that are using FTP and what jobs they are executing? > I did the standard SMF Dump and that shows records were pulled but does > not give > details. > > > > This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this > email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Question on EPILOG for OmegaMon
Yes, we are doing the same thing for the backup procedure, and we keep up to 12 months data. Except for we try to avoiod "EDS out of space" message EC897 coming up to console before the configured switch action on every Monday. That's why we implemented the Secondary Allocation. I thought VSAM can extend as many as 123 times, yet, it stopped when its 21st EXTENT attemption before Monday, while the volume is still with plenty of free space. On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Kelman, Tom wrote: > I don't know why it wouldn't be getting the 21st, 22nd, etc. extent, but > why not allocate several EPILOG Datastores with no secondary extents. > We don't use EPILOG in my current job, but when I was using the EDS in a > previous job I had it set up that way. I had allocated 7 Epilog > Datastores with each one large enough to hold about one days worth of > data in a single extent (no secondary extents). Then when one would > fill up EPILOG would switch to the next EDS and kick off a job that > would backup the one that had just filled. That way I had about a > week's worth of data online. The backup dataset was a gdg with 185 > generations to hold about 6 months of data. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Cobe Xu > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:50 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Question on EPILOG for OmegaMon > > Hi, > > Recently our system's EPLIOG datastore (EDS) is getting full faster than > before, and sometimes waning msg about EDS OUT OF SPACE went up. > We configured that EDS switches trigger as either in Monday or EDS FULL. > My question is how EPILOGC ( the collector) determine the active EDS is > FULL? > AFAIK, EDS is KSDS, and we create it with space (PRI 300 cyls, SEC 50 > cyls). > When I check the full EDS from 3.4, I saw it allocates 8250 trks, with > 20 > EXTs. > Since it can has 20 EXTs, why not 21st,22nd , and so on..? Is there any > limit elsewhere I should be aware? > > Thanks! > > > -- > Cobe Xu > > Best Regards > --- > zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst > E2E Performance Analyst > Email: cob...@gmail.com > --- > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > > > * > If you wish to communicate securely with Commerce Bank and its > affiliates, you must log into your account under Online Services at > http://www.commercebank.com or use the Commerce Bank Secure > Email Message Center at https://securemail.commercebank.com > > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files are > confidential. The information is exclusively for the use of the > individual or entity intended as the recipient. If you are not > the intended recipient, any use, copying, printing, reviewing, > retention, disclosure, distribution or forwarding of the message > or any attached file is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please > advise the sender by reply electronic mail immediately and > permanently delete the original transmission, any attachments > and any copies of this message from your computer system. > > * > > ------ > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Question on EPILOG for OmegaMon
Hi, Recently our system's EPLIOG datastore (EDS) is getting full faster than before, and sometimes waning msg about EDS OUT OF SPACE went up. We configured that EDS switches trigger as either in Monday or EDS FULL. My question is how EPILOGC ( the collector) determine the active EDS is FULL? AFAIK, EDS is KSDS, and we create it with space (PRI 300 cyls, SEC 50 cyls). When I check the full EDS from 3.4, I saw it allocates 8250 trks, with 20 EXTs. Since it can has 20 EXTs, why not 21st,22nd , and so on..? Is there any limit elsewhere I should be aware? Thanks! -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ESS 2105-800 DS6800 comparison
Hi Nigel, Since you had beening using ESS 2105-800, recently we're going to replace 2105-F20 with 2105-800. Are you aware any published performance data for 2105-800? I have been no luck in IBM PRODUCT page. On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Nigel Salway wrote: > I am looking at migrating from an ESS 2105-800 shark to a used DS6800 > 1750-522. > > I am curious to learn if anyone has done a similar conversion and can > comment on the relative performance of the two storage subsystems. The IBM > redbook SG24-6781-02 says the DS6800 will out-perform the 2105-800 shark in > most zOS implementations. > > I am also interested in hearing from someone who has installed a used > DS6800 and if they had any issues installing and setting up the DS Storage > Manager software. > > TIA > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ESS 2105-800 DS6800 comparison
talking about withdrawn, IBM had done long time ago for ESS 750/800. http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=ca&infotype=an&appname=iSource&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS906-016 On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Schwarz, Barry A wrote: > Are you aware that IBM has announced that the DS6000 line will be withdrawn > from marketing this summer? > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Nigel Salway > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:07 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: ESS 2105-800 DS6800 comparison > > I am looking at migrating from an ESS 2105-800 shark to a used DS6800 > 1750-522. > > I am curious to learn if anyone has done a similar conversion and can > comment on the relative performance of the two storage subsystems. The IBM > redbook SG24-6781-02 says the DS6800 will out-perform the 2105-800 shark in > most zOS implementations. > > I am also interested in hearing from someone who has installed a used > DS6800 and if they had any issues installing and setting up the DS Storage > Manager software. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: PCE long wait for JES2 command
Thanks, Allan..that make sense to me... I checked the jes2 init deck, there's no LINE(nnn) statement... On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Staller, Allan wrote: > If you have no lines, why are you issuing the command(s) at all? > Check and see if there are any line(nn) statements in you init deck and > only start/stop that number of lines, or remove the commands entirely if > no line(nn) statements are present. > > I just checked the manual and the range for line(*) is 1-65535. > Since you specified LINE(*) in your command, it will have to check 64K > lines. This is bound to take a while. > > This is most likely not caused by you MASDEF parameters. > > HTH, > > > We have a Lpar (not in sysplex), every time when we shutdown/warmstart > JES2 > in IPL, we have a command $PLINE(*)/$SLINE(*), we will get: > *$HASP9203 LONG PCE DISPATCH 188 > DURATION-000:00:17.76 PCE-COMM EXIT-NONE JOB ID-NONE > COMMAND-$PLINE(*) > $HASP003 RC=(25),P LINE(*) - NO SELECTABLE DEVICE(S) FOUND > $HASP9301 JES2 MAIN TASK ALERTS CLEARED > I checked, we don't have any LINE defined, why this command would spend > so > much time? Not sure if MASDEF related, > MASDEF DORMANCY=(100,500), > HOLD=0, > LOCKOUT=1000, > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
PCE long wait for JES2 command
Hi listers, We have a Lpar (not in sysplex), every time when we shutdown/warmstart JES2 in IPL, we have a command $PLINE(*)/$SLINE(*), we will get: *$HASP9203 LONG PCE DISPATCH 188 DURATION-000:00:17.76 PCE-COMM EXIT-NONE JOB ID-NONE COMMAND-$PLINE(*) $HASP003 RC=(25),P LINE(*) - NO SELECTABLE DEVICE(S) FOUND $HASP9301 JES2 MAIN TASK ALERTS CLEARED I checked, we don't have any LINE defined, why this command would spend so much time? Not sure if MASDEF related, MASDEF DORMANCY=(100,500), HOLD=0, LOCKOUT=1000, Anyother field I should check? Thanks! -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Page Dataset Question
IIRC, Isn't it suggested to allocate one Local on a full volume? On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Staller, Allan wrote: > This is a performance issue. In order for ASM not to care, the pages are > distributed (roughly equally) across all available page datsets. If the > algorithm were to take into account the available space: > 1) the additional overhead of keep track (probably miniscue per IO, but > imagine a paging rate of 100's or even thousands per second. (this > actually happened in "the good old days"). > 2) The concentration of pages in the larger page dataset would create a > "hot spot" in the aux stor subsystem and provide uneven performance, > depending on where your stolen pages were. > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense if "distributed equally" were defined as a > percentage of available space rather than number of pages? > > > All this does is allow for human error if the page ds's are not sized > equally! > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMF30 record length
Thanks a lot, Barry. I read this part of note in MXG sourcelib,too. It is very useful. However, I'm a little bit confuced when I sum up CPITCBTM & CPISRBTM by date for the 2 lpars (one is DDCONS=YES, the other is NO), the result is not what I expected to see: 1. The lpar with DDCONS=NO, then total CPITCBTM+CPISRBTM approachs 0. because all the jobs should bypass DD consolidations. But what I got is, still many many jobs spend a few seconds on CPITCBTM. So, how to explain? 2. The lpar with DDCONS=YES, should have much bigger value for CPITCBTM+CPISRBTM than the other lpar. But in fact the difference varies from 100 seconds to 350 seconds per day. regarding the EMPTYEXCPSEC(SUPPRESS) , we're still in 1.9. On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Barry Merrill wrote: > In 1987, Diane Eppestine at Southwestern Bell saw that whenever their > SAR job (a SYSOUT processing subsystem) was cancelled, the CPU went to > 100% busy for 30-60 minutes. Instruction traces found the "loop" was in > DD Consolidation. SAR dynamically allocates a DD for each SYSOUT file > it processes; by the end of the week that step had over 75,000 DD > entries! DD consolidation reads the first DD segment, scans the > remaining 74,999 segments for a match, reads the second and scans the > remaining 74,998 for a match, etc. etc., etc., all at DPRTY=FE! In > response to Diane's discovery, Bill Richardson, IBM SMF Development, > subsequently provided a new SMF option, DDCONS(NO), specified in > SYS1.PARMLIB(SMFPRMxx), so that you can disable this very unwise (in my > opinion) algorithm, and thereby eliminate its wasted CPITCBTM and CPISRBTM > (MXG names for SMF30ICU and SMF30ISB, the "Initiator" CPU time that > occurs before Step Program Load and after Step Program Termination). > > All of those empty SYSOUT DD segments can now be removed in z/OS 1.10 > with the EMPTYEXCPSEC(SUPPRESS) option: > > > > 1. APAR Identifier OA29582 adds new EMPTYEXCPSEC(SUPPRESS) option in > SYS1.PARMLIB to suppress all empty EXCP entries. > > The option prevents the creation of null segments in SMF 30 records > for SMS Candidate Volumes, and could significantly reduce the size > of your step and job termination records, especially if your site > has a default of (SYSDA,5) for every allocation!! > > The MVS Initialization and Tuning Reference, under the SMFPRMxx > parmlib parameter definitions, EMPTYEXCPSEC: > SUPRESS specifies that the system suppress the creation of empty > EXCP sections. Empty sections can be the result of non-dataset > allocations, such as DD DUMMY, or for spool file allocations > (i.e., SYSIN, SYSOUT JES DDs), or for non-allocated candidate > volumes in the SMS storage group. > > One MICS site reported a 28% reduction in CPU time with removal of > all of their empty EXCP segments. > >New EMPTYEXCPSEC option in PARMLIB is z/OS 1.10 only. >While EMPTYEXCPSEC option is documented in the z/OS 1.9 SMF >manual in Section 13.34.2.7 (Execute Channel Program (EXCP) >Section) of z/OS MVS System Management Facilities (SMF) Document >SA22-7630-16, for z/OS 1.9, testing on a z/OS 1.9 system >resulted in > >IEE945I UNRECOGNIZABLE OPTION 'EMPTYEXCPSEC' IN PARMLIB INPUT >IEE947I '/* DEFAULT RETRY */ > EMPTYEXCPSEC(SUPPRESS)' SKIPPED DUE TO PREVIOUS ERROR > > IBM has confirmed that the option only exists in z/OS 1.10, where > it is listed in the Release Guide as a 1.10 enhancement > > > > Barry Merrill > > ------ > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMF30 record length
thanks both... I did check SMF options, yep they're different. And it make sense to me. On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Staller, Allan wrote: > > ...This consolidates I/O sections, but is usually disabled > because of the large CPU costs and elapsetime of the consolidation, > mostly a problem for DB2. > > > Also DFHSM is notable for this same situation. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
SMF30 record length
1,036 .09 %72.00 7272 0 20 4,156 .36 %99.04 91 106 0 21 321 .03 %88.00 8888 0 2324 .00 % 258.00 258 258 0 26 797 .07 % 446.80 442 457 0 30 103,273 8.99 %14,642.36 398 32,750 0 34 113 .01 % 215.00 215 215 0 35 113 .01 % 149.89 148 150 0 3813 .00 % 208.00 208 208 0 41 1,618 .14 % 161.78 146 412 0 42 138,707 12.07 % 586.35 140 32,748 0 50 288 .03 % 242.00 242 242 0 57 1 .00 % 116.00 116 116 0 6050,775 4.42 % 434.73 334 2,741 0 6132,016 2.79 % 389.24 282 10,968 0 62 4,806 .42 % 189.03 188 218 0 6411,167 .97 % 458.00 458 458 0 6555,424 4.82 % 863.79 282 5,473 0 66 3,601 .31 % 467.23 285 8,208 0 70 192 .02 % 1,562.00 164 2,960 0 7196 .01 % 1,752.00 1,752 1,752 0 72 5,762 .50 % 1,742.16 1,076 22,668 0 7396 .01 %19,712.0019,712 19,712 0 74 2,502 .22 %17,938.05 364 32,720 0 75 768 .07 % 264.00 264 264 0 7625,440 2.21 % 217.93 216 344 0 7796 .01 % 9,293.33 1,280 25,120 0 78 192 .02 % 8,289.00 1,888 26,432 0 80 225,219 19.60 % 269.38 180 3,775 0 -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: RMF Spreadsheet Reporter
hi Michael, I have questions, in one of our shops, client limits FTP, or because we connect to the host via sine(ie. Aventail),thus we can not submit batch job from PC(RMF Spreadsheet reporter). Q1: So I copy the JCL to the host and submit manually, then download the "listing" file from host via ISPF.6. However, when I try to create working set from the this "listing" file, it comes up error saying " report options are not setting..can not process "the listing file path..." what's wrong? Q2: Can you share some sample control statements, if I want to produce workload CPU usage chart, by service class. Is this controlled in the overview file you specify in "SYSTEM OPTIONS" ? many thanks..! On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Michael Schmutzok wrote: > I've never created the working set directly from the SMF data. I create the > overview records first and then create the working set from that. e.g.: > > 1) Select SMF data set > 2) Create overview records (submits batch job) > 3) Retrieve the overview file from mainframe > 4) Select the overview file and create working set > > I create monthly charts/reports using this process > > > > > >>> Dana Mitchell 9/15/2009 2:19 PM >>> > Hello, > I'm trying to get the RMF Spreadsheet reporter working and I am quite > stumped. > > This is on Windows XP, Excel 2003. I have downloaded and installed the > latest version of the reporter. It starts up OK, I define my SMF dump > datasets. I Select Create->Workingset. The job runs successfully. The > workingset shows up in the working sets folder on the local side. Then I > select an excel spreadsheet to open. In the spreadsheet, click the button > to 'Select Working Set and process Data...'.Then I get an error message > box stating: 'No Working Set selected or no Working Set available'. > > Does anybody have any ideas what might be going on here? I can see the > working sets in the correct directory, but I can't convince Excel that > they are > there... > > Thanks > Dana > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > ------ > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: RMF Spreadsheet Reporter
I think it depends on what spreadsheet/report you are opening, some are empty, because there's no correspond smf record.. If all are not working, that's a problem. On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to get the RMF Spreadsheet reporter working and I am quite > stumped. > > This is on Windows XP, Excel 2003. I have downloaded and installed the > latest version of the reporter. It starts up OK, I define my SMF dump > datasets. I Select Create->Workingset. The job runs successfully. The > workingset shows up in the working sets folder on the local side. Then I > select an excel spreadsheet to open. In the spreadsheet, click the button > to 'Select Working Set and process Data...'.Then I get an error message > box stating: 'No Working Set selected or no Working Set available'. > > Does anybody have any ideas what might be going on here? I can see the > working sets in the correct directory, but I can't convince Excel that > they are > there... > > Thanks > Dana > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Assigning service class depending on system
how about by Qualifier Type "SSC", or Subsystem Collection Name, in Classification Rule for JES. 2009/5/27 גדי בן אבי > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to assign a service class depending on the system the job is > running on? > > > > We are running z/OS 1.9. > > > > TIA > > > > Gadi > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Here's what IBM pays an IOS developer
However, the number looks attractive in China or India... At least 2 skillful programmers can be afforded, I suspect. On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote: > I thought I'd sanity check $61K. That number looks low to me, too > > But, much to my surprise, according to Salary.com that 2005 advertised > salary is right around the median U.S. salary for "Programmer II" (an > intermediate programmer) in 2009, even after four extra years of inflation. > It's well above today's median for "Programmer I" (entry programmer). Note > that "Programmer I" and "Programmer II" refer to general programming, > averaging out all environments and all languages. It would seem the grass > ain't greener somewhere else, folks, even if we take the distinctly > unscientific approach and assume a single data point (and an advertised > salary at that, not necessarily one actually paid) reflects broad reality. > > It seems that "average" programmers (whatever that means) are paid less > than I expected, and excellent programmers are never paid enough. But > whichever HR department posted the $61K salary in 2005 certainly wasn't > crazy, because that department probably did the same thing I just did and > checked market salary ranges in at least cursory fashion. > > And if they didn't fill the job, they would advertise a higher salary. (Or > not fill the job.) Or the applicant would negotiate a higher salary. So > they'd learn pretty fast. There are two sides to any market: supply and > demand. > > Anybody got any better data on median salaries, including field-specific > and region-specific median salaries? > > - - - - - > Timothy Sipples > IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect > Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan / Asia-Pacific > E-Mail: timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: WLM TNG's what order and can you exclude?
I wonder if sub-rule in the Classification Rules will help? On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:09 AM, John Mattson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Been trying to figure this one out in the manuals and searching the net, > but no luck. > I have a few transaction name groups for my JES2 batch jobs. So far, in > general, things have worked pretty well, but suddenly there is a > Production job that someone wants to run at Discretionary. Of course the > naming convention P* drops all "not high Service Classes" into the lowest > Prod SC. Now someone wants one to go into Discretionary. And suddenly I > realize that I do not know > 1) What is the order that TNG's are searched? Are all names searched from > most specific to least as in RACF? Or is each TNG searched until the first > match is found? > 2) Is there a way to exclude a job or jobs from a TNG? So that it will > fall into another tng? > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards --- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Checkpoint job stops processing: Cancel command not working
we have ever met the situation that the Cancel command did not take effect when the system was 100% busy.. On 5/17/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone ran into this problem or can you tell me where to look for a > possible resolution. > > Running z/OS release 1.7. > > Payroll jobs that creates checkpoint tapes on real STK 3490 tape drives. > Job will process fine to a selected point and stop. > There are no outstanding replies to indicate a problem exist. > We issue the Cancel command numerous times and the job does not cancel; > therefore, we have to > Force Exit the job out of the System. > I have looked thru SYSLOG and cannot find any reason as to why the job > stopped > processing or why the cancel command is not working. It does say Cancel > command accepted. > IEE301I N97P5610 CANCEL COMMAND ACCEPTED > > > > > > > > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > -- Cobe Tsui Best Regards --- Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: WLM and TSO
Thanks everyone's patience, I think I understand more now. We do have an only one Service class for TSO, and in the classification rule for TSO and with default SC is TSO. WLM recognizes the workload from subsystem,too... All I thought was the *Selection rule* inside is a MUST, because I thought that's the only way WLM knows what service class for what workload. On 3/28/08, Kevin Mckenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 03/27/2008 > 10:27:40 AM: > > > Thanks Tom, > > > > yes, I can see the same thing in my shop,too. > > But, when I "Browse" the rule, there's nothing inside. Take "JES" as > > example, when I browse it inside, there will be rules, I know, they are > for > > different type of batch, some will be indentified by "TN", some maybe > "PFG", > > or others Identifier. > > Can I think this way, it is enough that just a *TSO* as you snapped, > then > > WLM will know TSO users's transactions...? > > When new work is submitted to the system, it has to go through WLM to be > classified. One of the characteristics that new work is judged on is the > subsystem name the work is coming from. In the case of TSO, the subsystem > is TSO. So if you have an entry for TSO, and no rules in there, things > from the TSO subsystem will be classified to the default service class for > TSO. In the case where there's no subsystem defined, it will be > classified to SYSOTHER, which is essentially discretionary. > > Kevin McKenzie > > External Phone: 845-435-8282, Tie-line: 8-295-8282 > z/OS BCP SVT, Dept FXKA, Bldg 706/2D38 > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Tsui Best Regards --- Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: WLM and TSO
Thanks Tom, yes, I can see the same thing in my shop,too. But, when I "Browse" the rule, there's nothing inside. Take "JES" as example, when I browse it inside, there will be rules, I know, they are for different type of batch, some will be indentified by "TN", some maybe "PFG", or others Identifier. Can I think this way, it is enough that just a *TSO* as you snapped, then WLM will know TSO users's transactions...? On 3/27/08, Kelman, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I should have entered this on my previous response. When I go to "6. > Classification Rules" on my WLM application I see the following. Note > the TSO entry at the bottom. > > > > --Class--- > > Action Type Description Service Report > > __ASCH APPC/MVS UsersNEWWORK RASCH > > __CICS CICS Workload TRANLORCICS > > __DB2 DB2 Sysplex Queries NEWWORK RDB2SQ > > __DDF DB2 Distributed Transactions DDF RDDF > > __IWEB Web Server Transactions NEWWORK RIWEB > > __JES Batch JobsTSTBATLO RTBATLO > > __MQMQSeries NEWWORKV RMQ > > __OMVS OpenEdition MVS/UNIX NEWWORK ROMVS > > __STC Started Tasks STCLO RSTCLO > > __TSO TSO Users TSOPRDRTSO > > > > Tom Kelman > > Commerce Bank of Kansas City > > (816) 760-7632 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > > Behalf Of Cobe Xu > > > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 4:35 AM > > > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > > Subject: Re: WLM and TSO > > > > > > > > > > > hi list, > > > > > > > > >any one is willing to answer a rookie's question: > > > > > >How WLM recognize TSO's workload? like trivial TSO transaction, > because > > > I > > > can not see there's a *classification rule* defined for TSO. > > > > > >like batch, stc, they have a rule... > > > > > > -- > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN > INFO > > > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cobe Tsui > > > > > > Best Regards > > > --- > > > Performance & Capacity Analyst > > > E2E Performance Analyst > > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --- > > > > > > -- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > > > > > > * > If you wish to communicate securely with Commerce Bank and its > affiliates, you must log into your account under Online Services at > http://www.commercebank.com or use the Commerce Bank Secure > Email Message Center at https://securemail.commercebank.com > > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files are > confidential. The information is exclusively for the use of the > individual or entity intended as the recipient. If you are not > the intended recipient, any use, copying, printing, reviewing, > retention, disclosure, distribution or forwarding of the message > or any attached file is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please > advise the sender by reply electronic mail immediately and > permanently delete the original transmission, any attachments > and any copies of this message from your computer system. > > * > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Tsui Best Regards --- Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: WLM and TSO
> > hi list, any one is willing to answer a rookie's question: How WLM recognize TSO's workload? like trivial TSO transaction, because I can not see there's a *classification rule* defined for TSO. like batch, stc, they have a rule... -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Tsui Best Regards --- Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Unable To Delete Archived Dataset
very interesting... can the dataset be renamed?? On 3/18/08, esmie moo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kenneth, > > There is no MSGID is because I tried the command via TSO (ISPF 3.4) > > The dsn I archived by DSM (CA-ALLOCATE). I tried the recall but it failed > because of the DSN - the last qualifier exceedes 8 characters. > > Kenneth E Tomiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice there is no MSGID with the :ITEM DOES NOT ADHERE TO > RESTRICTIONS text. Is that a DMS message? Maybe DMS is unable to delete > it's recorded entry of it being migrated? > > The IEFBR14 suggestion should have caused a RECALL to occur and then the > delete to happen. If it was not deleted, why isn't DMS recalling it > properly? > > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:57:53 -0400, esmie moo > wrote: > > >Good Day Gentle Readers, > > > > I am trying to delete this dataset MILDCOP.NPR256D.CNTLNLDSVOLD. Yes, > the last qualifier is correct. This dsn was migrated by DMS. I tried a del > nscr > purge but I got the error message :ITEM DOES NOT ADHERE TO > RESTRICTIONS. > > > > I also tried IEHPROGM to no avail. > > > > I cannot understand as to how this dsn was created. However, my > immediate problem is deleting this dsn. Could anybody suggestion > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > > > - > Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Tsui Best Regards --- Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CATALOG Quesiton
John, Just interested in this topic, I issued *F CATALOG,ALLOCATED *in my site, I could not see how many alias for a catalog, could you? or you got the number through other method/command? On 3/13/08, John Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestions. Donald, I used your command and it showed > that the CATALOG has 6 extents. Is there a maximum number of alias that is > permitted? Presently there are 2,737 alias. > > Thanks > > "Imbriale, Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Command F CATALOG,ALLOCATED will show message IEC348I. The last column: > > The percentage of allocated extents for each catalog in the list. This > percentage indicates the extent usage by either the data or index > component, whichever is higher, for that particular catalog. For > catalogs that are marked as closed or deleted, this value is N/A. > > Don Imbriale > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Dawes > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 2:39 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: CATALOG Quesiton > > Hallo To All, > > Is there a way of telling if a USER CAT is near full or full? > > > > > *** > Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, > offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer > account or account activity contained in this communication. > *** > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > > > - > Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Tsui Best Regards --- Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: [OT]Are there some standards and certifications that big software provider companies can get?
In my site, as I know, ISO2 is necessary for providing IT service support... On 12/31/07, legolas wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > I know that it is OT but I am looking to find out what kind of > certification a big software vendors should or can have. > for example I find that a company can get CMMI certification to show its > capability in developing softwares. > Are there other such certifications that a big company can get them in > areas like: > - Support quality > - Their developed Softwares security > - etc. > > > Thanks. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Tsui Best Regards --- Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Are any of us this desperate?
Now, I understand why they move work to China or India... Gary Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 2007-11-21 01:36 Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject Re: Are any of us this desperate? New Jersey minimum wage is $7.15, yes. Buit can one pay their real estate taxes? Wait, on that salary, one cannot afford to own a home. At that salary, 25% of my gross income would go to pay the real estate taxes on my house. And I not unusual. As a state, New Jersey has the highest RE taxes in the country. Or so I read. On Tue Nov 20 8:51 , Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >Mark Jacobs wrote: >> >> It's starvation wages. 20*40*52 = 41,600. >> > >Insulting for an IT professional? Yes! A scam to ensure no actual US >takers? Almost certainly! Starvation wages? No! > >Minimum wage in New Jersey is $7.15/hr. >http://lwd.dol.state.nj.us/labor/wagehour/lawregs/wage_and_hour_laws.html > >-- >Edward E Jaffe >Phoenix Software International, Inc >5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 >Los Angeles, CA 90045 >310-338-0400 x318 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
WLM can not save definition to new dataset
Hi, When I try to save WLM definition to a new dataset using "FILE -> SAVE AS", then I get the following msg: DATA SET SYSU.WLM.SERVDEF.NEW.CX NOT ALLOCATED, VOLUME NOT AVAILABLE+ VOLUME NECESSARY TO SATISFY YOUR REQUEST NOT ON SYSTEM, AND CANNOT BE MOUNTED *** and Unable to allocate new data set. TSO ALLOCATE return code is: RC=12 (IWMAM079) when I change the dataset HLQ to my user ID, it works ok. Is that possible the CATALOG 's problem? cuz' they are in different UCATs. or the SMS routine's problem? Any help will be appreciated. PS: I have access to SYSU HLQ datasets, I can manually allocate the dataset in 3.2. BEST REGARDS Cobe Xu,Qing Rong (徐庆荣) Performance Analyst IBM Global Delivery Center