date:20091208


The simplest solution is to make your button a submit button, this way when
it clicked, the entire page will be  reloaded  components will render
according to their new state. 

The second approach can be using ajax. I prefer the approach described on
this blog:
http://techblog.molindo.at/2008/09/wicket-loose-coupling-of-componens-for-ajax-updates.html

Alex Objelean


Madhuri Garimella wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I need a help in wicket. I have a panel containing a button and another
 panel containing components. on click of the first panel button i want to
 change the second panel components. Is there any way to do that. Please
 reply ASAP.
 
 
 Regards
 Madhu.
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/button-in-one-panel-can-change-the-components-in-other-panel---tp26692926p26693609.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: button in one panel can change the components in other panel ?

2009-12-08 Thread Pieter Degraeuwe

I suggest you work with a callback/listener mechanism.

ButtonPanel has a reference to a calback/listener. In the onclick() you call
that callback. The implementation of that callback can be done by the
component/page that uses the buttonPanel. (Losely coupling...)

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Madhuri Garimella
m.garimel...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I need a help in wicket. I have a panel containing a button and another
 panel containing components. on click of the first panel button i want to
 change the second panel components. Is there any way to do that. Please
 reply ASAP.


 Regards
 Madhu.




-- 
Pieter Degraeuwe
Systemworks bvba
Belgiëlaan 61
9070 Destelbergen
GSM: +32 (0)485/68.60.85
Email: pieter.degrae...@systemworks.be
visit us at http://www.systemworks.be

Re: Bookmarkable images from db

2009-12-08 Thread Peter Dotchev


Hi,

Actually there is a clean and easy Wicket way to do this.
No servlets, no URL hand writing.
It is achieved by using a shared resource with parameters as mentioned
above.
I have described it 
http://dotev.blogspot.com/2009/11/serving-images-and-other-resources-with.html
here .

Best regards,
Peter


Juan Pablo Picasso wrote:
 
 Hi, I've implemented this by mounting a bookmarkable page and writing into
 the response. I've imagine this bypasses some useful wicket features, but
 was the only way I use bookmarkable urls like /image/someImageName for
 mapping user uploaded images:
 
 #Application
 this.mount(new IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy(/image, ImagePage.class));
 
 #ImagePage class
 public class ImagePage extends WebPage {
 
 private static Logger logger =
 LoggerFactory.getLogger(ImagePage.class);
 
 @Override
 protected void onRender(MarkupStream markupStream) {
 String imageName = (String)
 this.getRequest().getParameterMap().get(0);
 
 byte[] fileContents = PersistenceFacade.readFile(imageName);
 try {
 this.getResponse().getOutputStream().write(fileContents);
 } catch (IOException e) {
 logger.error(Could not write image [ + imageName + ]
 into
 the response, e);
 }
 }
 }
 }
 
 Any suggestions are welcome,
 regards!
 Juan
 
 On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Alex Objelean
 alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:
 

 Exactly. You can see the example posted by Vytautas Racelis earlier at
 this
 link:

 http://xaloon.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/xaloon-wicket-repository/src/main/java/org/xaloon/wicket/component/resource/ImageLink.java

 I prefer to do it this way:
 http://pastebin.com/m328e21ff

 The first example allow you to use directly an Image component, while the
 second allows you to build the url of any resource by name..

 Alex Objelean


 Peter Dotchev wrote:
 
  Hi Alex,
 
  I check SharedResources, but as I understand it I would have to add
 there
  a Resource object for each image.
 
  After checking again the javadoc there might be another way.
  Display each image with Image constructor that takes ValueMap and
 provide
  there some image identification.
  Add a single Resource object for all images and from
 getResourceStream()
  implementation to call getParameters() which will return the same
  parameters passed to Image constructor and tell me which image to
 return.
  Will this work?
 
  Best regards,
  Petar
 
 
  Alexandru Objelean wrote:
 
  Besides the servlet, there is also a wicket way of do it:
 
  - Use shared resource, which is stateless and bookmarkable
 
  If you need more informations about this approach, search on forum or
  just ask... and I'll provide you with some examples of how I do it..
 
  Alex Objelean
 
 
  Peter Dotchev wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  My app allows users to upload images and I store them in JCR
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_repository_API_for_Java. I can
  get InputStream for each one of them.
  I want to display images in specific pages and I want image URLs to
 be
  stable/bookmarkable. Also I don't want these pages to use the session
 in
  any way.
  I checked again chapter 9 about images from Wicket In Action but such
  use case is not addressed there.
 
  I found that SharedResources allows for stable URLs, but I cannot
  register each individual image.
 
  What approach would you suggest?
 
  Best regards,
  Peter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://old.nabble.com/Bookmarkable-images-from-db-tp26154577p26157757.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Bookmarkable-images-from-db-tp26154577p26693928.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Wicket Test Harness and HTTP objects

2009-12-08 Thread Loritsch, Berin C.

I discovered as I implemented the SessionListener to clean up user
record locks that the WicketTester object does not behave as expected in
regards to the HttpSession objects.  I expected to have my
MockHttpSession already configured with the application session object
bound in the specified location.  In otherwords I would expect the
following to work:

MySession session = MySession.get();
HttpSession htSession = tester.getHttpSession();

assertEquals(session, htSession.get(wicket:myapp.context: +
Session.SESSION_ATTRIBUTE_NAME)) 


This is a true condition with a deployed application, however the
mapping has to be done manually by my testcase.  Is this by design or is
this a bug?  The mock objects should provide enough imitation of reality
to allow testing integration points like this a bit easier.

Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

Hi all:

I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically I want my
app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user responds.  But
I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form buttons, because I
only want to do this sometimes.  In other words sometimes I want to deploy
an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I want the user
to stay on the same page after submitting.

The ideal place seems to be on the page level.  but it seems you can't call
setResponsePage in the onDetach method.  Where in request life-cycle would
be the place to do this sort of redirect?

Thanks and regards,
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

RE: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

2009-12-08 Thread Alex Rass

So: always override onSumbit for the buttons and *sometimes* redirect.
Tis all.

- Alex

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskal [mailto:rmos...@mostmedia.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:05 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

Hi all:

I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically I want my
app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user responds.  But
I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form buttons, because I
only want to do this sometimes.  In other words sometimes I want to deploy
an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I want the user
to stay on the same page after submitting.

The ideal place seems to be on the page level.  but it seems you can't call
setResponsePage in the onDetach method.  Where in request life-cycle would
be the place to do this sort of redirect?

Thanks and regards,
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

That's just what I don't want to do.  My forms live as private classes on a
panel (one form per one style of panel).  I don't want to have to introduce
n new panels to handle the case where I wan to do the redirect.  I was
hoping I could do it in one place (kind of like an aop after advice :).
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744


On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rass a...@itbsllc.com wrote:

 So: always override onSumbit for the buttons and *sometimes* redirect.
 Tis all.

 - Alex

 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Moskal [mailto:rmos...@mostmedia.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:05 PM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

 Hi all:

 I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically I want my
 app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user responds.
  But
 I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form buttons, because
 I
 only want to do this sometimes.  In other words sometimes I want to deploy
 an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I want the user
 to stay on the same page after submitting.

 The ideal place seems to be on the page level.  but it seems you can't call
 setResponsePage in the onDetach method.  Where in request life-cycle would
 be the place to do this sort of redirect?

 Thanks and regards,
 ___
 Robert Moskal
 Most Media
 Brooklyn, USA
 347-529-4744


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

You don't have to expose your private panels. Just create a protected method
which handles the form submission override it in inherited components.

Alex Objelean

rmoskal wrote:

That's just what I don't want to do. My forms live as private classes on
a
panel (one form per one style of panel). I don't want to have to
introduce
n new panels to handle the case where I wan to do the redirect. I was
hoping I could do it in one place (kind of like an aop after advice :).
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rass a...@itbsllc.com wrote:

So: always override onSumbit for the buttons and *sometimes* redirect.
Tis all.

- Alex

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskal [mailto:rmos...@mostmedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:05 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

Hi all:

I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically I want
my
app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user responds.
But
I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form buttons,
because
I
only want to do this sometimes. In other words sometimes I want to
deploy
an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I want the
user
to stay on the same page after submitting.

The ideal place seems to be on the page level. but it seems you can't
call
setResponsePage in the onDetach method. Where in request life-cycle
would
be the place to do this sort of redirect?

Thanks and regards,
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Redirect-after-for-submit%2C-but-not-what-you-think-tp26697152p26697704.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

I could do that, but would be nicer if I didn't have to touch n classes or
create a class hierarchy for my Panel.  I don't like my Page knowing so much
about what goes on in my Panels either.

Thanks!

Robert
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744


On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Alex Objelean alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:


 You don't have to expose your private panels. Just create a protected
 method
 which handles the form submission  override it in inherited components.

 Alex Objelean


 rmoskal wrote:
 
  That's just what I don't want to do.  My forms live as private classes on
  a
  panel (one form per one style of panel).  I don't want to have to
  introduce
  n new panels to handle the case where I wan to do the redirect.  I was
  hoping I could do it in one place (kind of like an aop after advice :).
  ___
  Robert Moskal
  Most Media
  Brooklyn, USA
  347-529-4744
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rass a...@itbsllc.com wrote:
 
  So: always override onSumbit for the buttons and *sometimes* redirect.
  Tis all.
 
  - Alex
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Robert Moskal [mailto:rmos...@mostmedia.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:05 PM
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Subject: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think
 
  Hi all:
 
  I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically I want
  my
  app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user responds.
   But
  I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form buttons,
  because
  I
  only want to do this sometimes.  In other words sometimes I want to
  deploy
  an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I want the
  user
  to stay on the same page after submitting.
 
  The ideal place seems to be on the page level.  but it seems you can't
  call
  setResponsePage in the onDetach method.  Where in request life-cycle
  would
  be the place to do this sort of redirect?
 
  Thanks and regards,
  ___
  Robert Moskal
  Most Media
  Brooklyn, USA
  347-529-4744
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://old.nabble.com/Redirect-after-for-submit%2C-but-not-what-you-think-tp26697152p26697704.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

You can define a default behavior (for instance no redirect after submit)
apply redirect only for few pages. It is a nice solution... it reminds me
about template method design pattern.

Alex

rmoskal wrote:

I could do that, but would be nicer if I didn't have to touch n classes or
create a class hierarchy for my Panel. I don't like my Page knowing so
much
about what goes on in my Panels either.

Thanks!

Robert
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Alex Objelean
alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:

You don't have to expose your private panels. Just create a protected
method
which handles the form submission override it in inherited components.

Alex Objelean

rmoskal wrote:

That's just what I don't want to do. My forms live as private classes
on
a
panel (one form per one style of panel). I don't want to have to
introduce
n new panels to handle the case where I wan to do the redirect. I was
hoping I could do it in one place (kind of like an aop after advice :).
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rass a...@itbsllc.com wrote:

So: always override onSumbit for the buttons and *sometimes* redirect.
Tis all.

- Alex

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskal [mailto:rmos...@mostmedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:05 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

Hi all:

I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically I
want
my
app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user
responds.
But
I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form buttons,
because
I
only want to do this sometimes. In other words sometimes I want to
deploy
an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I want the
user
to stay on the same page after submitting.

The ideal place seems to be on the page level. but it seems you can't
call
setResponsePage in the onDetach method. Where in request life-cycle
would
be the place to do this sort of redirect?

Thanks and regards,
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Redirect-after-for-submit%2C-but-not-what-you-think-tp26697152p26697704.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Redirect-after-for-submit%2C-but-not-what-you-think-tp26697152p26698038.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Questions about Serialization...

2009-12-08 Thread Yves-Marie LAINÉ

Hi,

I'm new on the list, sorry if my question has already been asked. I didn't
find the right answer on google.

Is it possible tu use wicket without Page serialization ? If no, why ?
Technically, is it possible to imagine a SimpleHttpSessionPageStore that
don't serialize objects and keep them as they are in session, like it's done
in others frameworks ? I know, the main reason is to save Session memory by
writing pages versions on disk... ok.

But... I'm working on an app that consist of few pages, not versioned (no
need of the back button support), because I need to keep page state through
navigation, I keep pages references created, avoiding creation of a new page
instance when back on a visited page.. I don't need to write anything on
disk, the session space is enough.

This way, i wanted to share a data object instance between pages (as class
member), for modification. But due to the Page Serialization the object
identity is broken. My unique data object instance turn into several
instances (As much as pages that references it i guess ...)

I know that I can get arround this by putting directly my object in
session.. But, my question is, why to force serialization when we don't need
it ?

Regards,
Yves-Marie

PS : sorry for my english.


Thanks!

Re: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

Thanks Alex.  It does seem a like a slightly old-fashioned way of doing
things. My factory instantiates the Panels by reflection from the class name
(kept in a spring file).  I personally don't know how to create an anonymous
class when I instantiate something using the reflection api.  I suppose I
could pass in an interface that is to be called by the onSubmit method or
change the factory to create an anonymous subclass of my panels, but all
this seems like a lot of work to accomplish such a simple thing.

I will keep thinking on it and will post if I come up a less obtrusive way
to handle this.  You have helped me focus my thoughts.

Regards,

Robert
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744


On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Alex Objelean alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:


 You can define a default behavior (for instance no redirect after submit) 
 apply redirect only for few pages. It is a nice solution... it reminds me
 about template method design pattern.

 Alex


 rmoskal wrote:
 
  I could do that, but would be nicer if I didn't have to touch n classes
 or
  create a class hierarchy for my Panel.  I don't like my Page knowing so
  much
  about what goes on in my Panels either.
 
  Thanks!
 
  Robert
  ___
  Robert Moskal
  Most Media
  Brooklyn, USA
  347-529-4744
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Alex Objelean
  alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:
 
 
  You don't have to expose your private panels. Just create a protected
  method
  which handles the form submission  override it in inherited components.
 
  Alex Objelean
 
 
  rmoskal wrote:
  
   That's just what I don't want to do.  My forms live as private classes
  on
   a
   panel (one form per one style of panel).  I don't want to have to
   introduce
   n new panels to handle the case where I wan to do the redirect.  I was
   hoping I could do it in one place (kind of like an aop after advice
 :).
   ___
   Robert Moskal
   Most Media
   Brooklyn, USA
   347-529-4744
  
  
   On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rass a...@itbsllc.com wrote:
  
   So: always override onSumbit for the buttons and *sometimes*
 redirect.
   Tis all.
  
   - Alex
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Robert Moskal [mailto:rmos...@mostmedia.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:05 PM
   To: users@wicket.apache.org
   Subject: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think
  
   Hi all:
  
   I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically I
  want
   my
   app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user
  responds.
But
   I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form buttons,
   because
   I
   only want to do this sometimes.  In other words sometimes I want to
   deploy
   an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I want
 the
   user
   to stay on the same page after submitting.
  
   The ideal place seems to be on the page level.  but it seems you
 can't
   call
   setResponsePage in the onDetach method.  Where in request life-cycle
   would
   be the place to do this sort of redirect?
  
   Thanks and regards,
   ___
   Robert Moskal
   Most Media
   Brooklyn, USA
   347-529-4744
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
  
  
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://old.nabble.com/Redirect-after-for-submit%2C-but-not-what-you-think-tp26697152p26697704.html
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://old.nabble.com/Redirect-after-for-submit%2C-but-not-what-you-think-tp26697152p26698038.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

Wicket is unmanaged framework. I've never have seen a wicket code which would
use instantiation of panels using spring. I don't know I understand it... do
you have some special use-case? Can you describe it? My first thought is,
that this is some sort of over engineering which doesn't bring you any
advantage.

Alex

rmoskal wrote:

Thanks Alex. It does seem a like a slightly old-fashioned way of doing
things. My factory instantiates the Panels by reflection from the class
name
(kept in a spring file). I personally don't know how to create an
anonymous
class when I instantiate something using the reflection api. I suppose I
could pass in an interface that is to be called by the onSubmit method or
change the factory to create an anonymous subclass of my panels, but all
this seems like a lot of work to accomplish such a simple thing.

I will keep thinking on it and will post if I come up a less obtrusive way
to handle this. You have helped me focus my thoughts.

Regards,

Robert
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Alex Objelean
alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:

You can define a default behavior (for instance no redirect after submit)

apply redirect only for few pages. It is a nice solution... it reminds me
about template method design pattern.

Alex

rmoskal wrote:

I could do that, but would be nicer if I didn't have to touch n classes
or
create a class hierarchy for my Panel. I don't like my Page knowing so
much
about what goes on in my Panels either.

Thanks!

Robert
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Alex Objelean
alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:

You don't have to expose your private panels. Just create a protected
method
which handles the form submission override it in inherited
components.

Alex Objelean

rmoskal wrote:

That's just what I don't want to do. My forms live as private
classes
on
a
panel (one form per one style of panel). I don't want to have to
introduce
n new panels to handle the case where I wan to do the redirect. I
was
hoping I could do it in one place (kind of like an aop after advice
:).
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rass a...@itbsllc.com wrote:

So: always override onSumbit for the buttons and *sometimes*
redirect.
Tis all.

- Alex

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskal [mailto:rmos...@mostmedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:05 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

Hi all:

I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically I
want
my
app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user
responds.
But
I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form buttons,
because
I
only want to do this sometimes. In other words sometimes I want to
deploy
an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I want
the
user
to stay on the same page after submitting.

The ideal place seems to be on the page level. but it seems you
can't
call
setResponsePage in the onDetach method. Where in request
life-cycle
would
be the place to do this sort of redirect?

Thanks and regards,
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
View this message in context:

http://old.nabble.com/Redirect-after-for-submit%2C-but-not-what-you-think-tp26697152p26697704.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Redirect-after-for-submit%2C-but-not-what-you-think-tp26697152p26698038.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Redirect-after-for-submit%2C-but-not-what-you-think-tp26697152p26699099.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Questions about Serialization...

2009-12-08 Thread Martin Makundi

Where do you keep your data between pages if not in session?

**
Martin

2009/12/8 Yves-Marie LAINÉ ymla...@gmail.com:
 Hi,

 I'm new on the list, sorry if my question has already been asked. I didn't
 find the right answer on google.

 Is it possible tu use wicket without Page serialization ? If no, why ?
 Technically, is it possible to imagine a SimpleHttpSessionPageStore that
 don't serialize objects and keep them as they are in session, like it's done
 in others frameworks ? I know, the main reason is to save Session memory by
 writing pages versions on disk... ok.

 But... I'm working on an app that consist of few pages, not versioned (no
 need of the back button support), because I need to keep page state through
 navigation, I keep pages references created, avoiding creation of a new page
 instance when back on a visited page.. I don't need to write anything on
 disk, the session space is enough.

 This way, i wanted to share a data object instance between pages (as class
 member), for modification. But due to the Page Serialization the object
 identity is broken. My unique data object instance turn into several
 instances (As much as pages that references it i guess ...)

 I know that I can get arround this by putting directly my object in
 session.. But, my question is, why to force serialization when we don't need
 it ?

 Regards,
 Yves-Marie

 PS : sorry for my english.


 Thanks!


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Questions about Serialization...

you can create your own ISessionStore implementation that keeps all
objects in memory.

-igor

2009/12/8 Yves-Marie LAINÉ ymla...@gmail.com:
 Hi,

 I'm new on the list, sorry if my question has already been asked. I didn't
 find the right answer on google.

 Is it possible tu use wicket without Page serialization ? If no, why ?
 Technically, is it possible to imagine a SimpleHttpSessionPageStore that
 don't serialize objects and keep them as they are in session, like it's done
 in others frameworks ? I know, the main reason is to save Session memory by
 writing pages versions on disk... ok.

 But... I'm working on an app that consist of few pages, not versioned (no
 need of the back button support), because I need to keep page state through
 navigation, I keep pages references created, avoiding creation of a new page
 instance when back on a visited page.. I don't need to write anything on
 disk, the session space is enough.

 This way, i wanted to share a data object instance between pages (as class
 member), for modification. But due to the Page Serialization the object
 identity is broken. My unique data object instance turn into several
 instances (As much as pages that references it i guess ...)

 I know that I can get arround this by putting directly my object in
 session.. But, my question is, why to force serialization when we don't need
 it ?

 Regards,
 Yves-Marie

 PS : sorry for my english.


 Thanks!


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: AjaxEditableLabel

2009-12-08 Thread TahitianGabriel


Try to add URIEncoding=UTF-8 in the Connector meta in the server.xml file
of Tomcat:

Connector URIEncoding=UTF-8 ...

Should solve your problem...

Regards,

Gabriel.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/AjaxEditableLabel-tp26676156p26699350.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Questions about Serialization...

2009-12-08 Thread Marat Radchenko

2009/12/8 Yves-Marie LAINÉ ymla...@gmail.com:
 Hi,

 I'm new on the list, sorry if my question has already been asked. I didn't
 find the right answer on google.

 Is it possible tu use wicket without Page serialization ?
It is. Use only stateless components.

 Technically, is it possible to imagine a SimpleHttpSessionPageStore that
 don't serialize objects and keep them as they are in session, like it's done
 in others frameworks ?
Logic flaw: session contents CAN get serialized. Read Servlet spec,
you shouldn't put non-serializable stuff in session.

 But... I'm working on an app that consist of few pages, not versioned (no
 need of the back button support), because I need to keep page state through
 navigation, I keep pages references created, avoiding creation of a new page
 instance when back on a visited page.. I don't need to write anything on
 disk, the session space is enough.
Same flaw.

 This way, i wanted to share a data object instance between pages (as class
 member), for modification. But due to the Page Serialization the object
 identity is broken.
That just means your data object serialization is broken.

Sidenote: you can use HttpSessionStore (instead of
SecondLevelCacheSessionStore) to make wicket store everything in
session (but not in it's custom wicket on-disk store)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think

Our application is configured after compilation.  I have many different
renderers implemented as  panels with a private form for a large
population of content types.

When we deploy the application we have to specify the ones we want to
actually use. Since there's no compilation involved in deploying and since
we already use it for all sorts of other things (like specifying persistence
providers, third party integration), the spring context seems like a a
natural place from which to load the

Currently I'm thinking about implementing the functionality using jquery in
the client.  Find the appropriate ui control, decorate it and
programmatically click the next button.  It's elegant in the sense that use
case is addressed with a single change and not too fragile, since it is done
on the page level and page is where the paging control lives.

Again Alex, thanks for sharpening my thoughts
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744


On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Alex Objelean alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:


 Wicket is unmanaged framework. I've never have seen a wicket code which
 would
 use instantiation of panels using spring. I don't know I understand it...
 do
 you have some special use-case? Can you describe it? My first thought is,
 that this is some sort of over engineering which doesn't bring you any
 advantage.

 Alex


 rmoskal wrote:
 
  Thanks Alex.  It does seem a like a slightly old-fashioned way of doing
  things. My factory instantiates the Panels by reflection from the class
  name
  (kept in a spring file).  I personally don't know how to create an
  anonymous
  class when I instantiate something using the reflection api.  I suppose I
  could pass in an interface that is to be called by the onSubmit method or
  change the factory to create an anonymous subclass of my panels, but all
  this seems like a lot of work to accomplish such a simple thing.
 
  I will keep thinking on it and will post if I come up a less obtrusive
 way
  to handle this.  You have helped me focus my thoughts.
 
  Regards,
 
  Robert
  ___
  Robert Moskal
  Most Media
  Brooklyn, USA
  347-529-4744
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Alex Objelean
  alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:
 
 
  You can define a default behavior (for instance no redirect after
 submit)
  
  apply redirect only for few pages. It is a nice solution... it reminds
 me
  about template method design pattern.
 
  Alex
 
 
  rmoskal wrote:
  
   I could do that, but would be nicer if I didn't have to touch n
 classes
  or
   create a class hierarchy for my Panel.  I don't like my Page knowing
 so
   much
   about what goes on in my Panels either.
  
   Thanks!
  
   Robert
   ___
   Robert Moskal
   Most Media
   Brooklyn, USA
   347-529-4744
  
  
   On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Alex Objelean
   alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:
  
  
   You don't have to expose your private panels. Just create a protected
   method
   which handles the form submission  override it in inherited
  components.
  
   Alex Objelean
  
  
   rmoskal wrote:
   
That's just what I don't want to do.  My forms live as private
  classes
   on
a
panel (one form per one style of panel).  I don't want to have to
introduce
n new panels to handle the case where I wan to do the redirect.  I
  was
hoping I could do it in one place (kind of like an aop after advice
  :).
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744
   
   
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rass a...@itbsllc.com wrote:
   
So: always override onSumbit for the buttons and *sometimes*
  redirect.
Tis all.
   
- Alex
   
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskal [mailto:rmos...@mostmedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:05 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think
   
Hi all:
   
I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically I
   want
my
app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user
   responds.
 But
I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form buttons,
because
I
only want to do this sometimes.  In other words sometimes I want
 to
deploy
an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I want
  the
user
to stay on the same page after submitting.
   
The ideal place seems to be on the page level.  but it seems you
  can't
call
setResponsePage in the onDetach method.  Where in request
  life-cycle
would
be the place to do this sort of redirect?
   
Thanks and regards,
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744
   
   
   
  -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
   
   
   
   
  
   --
   View

Re: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think


You may want to take a look to brix (http://code.google.com/p/brix-cms/)
project. It is a wicket-based CMS framework  it also has a similar use-case
like yours. Maybe you'll find their approach interesting...

Alex


rmoskal wrote:
 
 Our application is configured after compilation.  I have many different
 renderers implemented as  panels with a private form for a large
 population of content types.
 
 When we deploy the application we have to specify the ones we want to
 actually use. Since there's no compilation involved in deploying and since
 we already use it for all sorts of other things (like specifying
 persistence
 providers, third party integration), the spring context seems like a a
 natural place from which to load the
 
 Currently I'm thinking about implementing the functionality using jquery
 in
 the client.  Find the appropriate ui control, decorate it and
 programmatically click the next button.  It's elegant in the sense that
 use
 case is addressed with a single change and not too fragile, since it is
 done
 on the page level and page is where the paging control lives.
 
 Again Alex, thanks for sharpening my thoughts
 ___
 Robert Moskal
 Most Media
 Brooklyn, USA
 347-529-4744
 
 
 On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Alex Objelean
 alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:
 

 Wicket is unmanaged framework. I've never have seen a wicket code which
 would
 use instantiation of panels using spring. I don't know I understand it...
 do
 you have some special use-case? Can you describe it? My first thought is,
 that this is some sort of over engineering which doesn't bring you any
 advantage.

 Alex


 rmoskal wrote:
 
  Thanks Alex.  It does seem a like a slightly old-fashioned way of doing
  things. My factory instantiates the Panels by reflection from the class
  name
  (kept in a spring file).  I personally don't know how to create an
  anonymous
  class when I instantiate something using the reflection api.  I suppose
 I
  could pass in an interface that is to be called by the onSubmit method
 or
  change the factory to create an anonymous subclass of my panels, but
 all
  this seems like a lot of work to accomplish such a simple thing.
 
  I will keep thinking on it and will post if I come up a less obtrusive
 way
  to handle this.  You have helped me focus my thoughts.
 
  Regards,
 
  Robert
  ___
  Robert Moskal
  Most Media
  Brooklyn, USA
  347-529-4744
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Alex Objelean
  alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:
 
 
  You can define a default behavior (for instance no redirect after
 submit)
  
  apply redirect only for few pages. It is a nice solution... it reminds
 me
  about template method design pattern.
 
  Alex
 
 
  rmoskal wrote:
  
   I could do that, but would be nicer if I didn't have to touch n
 classes
  or
   create a class hierarchy for my Panel.  I don't like my Page knowing
 so
   much
   about what goes on in my Panels either.
  
   Thanks!
  
   Robert
   ___
   Robert Moskal
   Most Media
   Brooklyn, USA
   347-529-4744
  
  
   On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Alex Objelean
   alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:
  
  
   You don't have to expose your private panels. Just create a
 protected
   method
   which handles the form submission  override it in inherited
  components.
  
   Alex Objelean
  
  
   rmoskal wrote:
   
That's just what I don't want to do.  My forms live as private
  classes
   on
a
panel (one form per one style of panel).  I don't want to have to
introduce
n new panels to handle the case where I wan to do the redirect. 
 I
  was
hoping I could do it in one place (kind of like an aop after
 advice
  :).
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media
Brooklyn, USA
347-529-4744
   
   
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rass a...@itbsllc.com
 wrote:
   
So: always override onSumbit for the buttons and *sometimes*
  redirect.
Tis all.
   
- Alex
   
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskal [mailto:rmos...@mostmedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:05 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Redirect after for submit, but not what you think
   
Hi all:
   
I'd like to be able to redirect after I submit a form, basically
 I
   want
my
app to navigate to the next question in a survey after a user
   responds.
 But
I don't want to do this in the onClick method of the form
 buttons,
because
I
only want to do this sometimes.  In other words sometimes I want
 to
deploy
an application where I do the auto-navigation and sometimes I
 want
  the
user
to stay on the same page after submitting.
   
The ideal place seems to be on the page level.  but it seems you
  can't
call
setResponsePage in the onDetach method.  Where in request
  life-cycle
would
be the place to do this sort of redirect?
   
Thanks and regards,
___
Robert Moskal
Most Media

Form submit error after upgrading to 4.1

2009-12-08 Thread Douglas Ferguson

I've been having some upgrade woes.

I tried to upgrade to 4.3 and got the wicket:enclosure error then I rolled back 
to 4.1 and everything seemed fine, but I just found an error with a form that 
wouldn't submit.
I had a drop drop that was set to required and it was preventing the form from 
submitting even though it had a valid value.

This works fine in 4.0 but not in 4.1.

D/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Form submit error after upgrading to 4.1

quickstart+jira issue.

-igor

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Douglas Ferguson
doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
 I've been having some upgrade woes.

 I tried to upgrade to 4.3 and got the wicket:enclosure error then I rolled 
 back to 4.1 and everything seemed fine, but I just found an error with a form 
 that wouldn't submit.
 I had a drop drop that was set to required and it was preventing the form 
 from submitting even though it had a valid value.

 This works fine in 4.0 but not in 4.1.

 D/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Data Provider

2009-12-08 Thread hill180

Hello Group,

Just a questions to get a point in the right direction.

I have a Modal Window that opens when a Search AjaxLink is clicked.  All is
Good There.

The modal Window is a form which has a datatable which autoupdates on
textfield.  No Problems there.

The problem is the Navigation   1 2 3 4 5 6  

When I click on the Navigation, the Model window closes.  When I click on
the ajaxLink again, the Model opens at the page I clicked prior to the
window closing.

odd, not sure if this is the wrong component to use, or if I need to set
some parameter to prevent the Model Window from closing.

Thanks,

joe.

Re: WicketStuff and wicket-contrib-javaee

2009-12-08 Thread Alan Garfield

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 00:26 +0100, Major Péter wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 Lately I had to make some refactoring in wicket-contrib-javaee, and I
 saw, that the project is not well maintained. In the repo I only could
 find the source for v1.0, but only on sourceforge did I found the v1.1
 sources. :s
 So after I had refactored the source to make it work with Wicket 1.5
 trunk, I would like to resurrect, maybe maintain the project for a while.
 I've found these guides:
 http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information
 http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/WicketStuff+Core+-+Migration+Guide
 Is there something else, that I should be aware of?
 
 Also I'm using NetBeans with Automatic Code Format, but as far as I know
 there are some code format rules for projects (how the code should be
 indented where are the brackets, etc). The only problem is that NetBeans
 auto format doesn't format the code this way, so I may would break these
 rules. Do you know any tool which would solve me this issue? :)
 Thanks
 
 Best Regards,
 Peter Major

Hey Peter,

Well, it would appear there hasn't been a massive response to your
question (which IMHO appears to be pretty common whenever you mention
EJB on this list), but anyway I'm very interested in what you've done
and I really hope you can take over the maintenance of
wicket-contrib-javaee.

Thanks,
Alan.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: WicketStuff and wicket-contrib-javaee

2009-12-08 Thread bht

Hi Peter,

When my response has EJB in it, it can't be MASSIVE because EJB, you
hardly worry about it.

EJB is great, easy to use, and Wicket with EJB is even better. VERY
powerful combination. The thing is it just works, and there is no need
to talk about it much, especially with the NetBeans Wicket plugin,
NetBeans automatic Deploy on Save, refactoring support etc..

Many thanks for your contribution in this area.

Bernard

On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:51:18 +1100, you wrote:

Hey Peter,

Well, it would appear there hasn't been a massive response to your
question (which IMHO appears to be pretty common whenever you mention
EJB on this list), but anyway I'm very interested in what you've done
and I really hope you can take over the maintenance of
wicket-contrib-javaee.

Thanks,
Alan.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Data Provider

2009-12-08 Thread Martin Makundi

Modal window can contain only ajax components. Are you using ajaxdatatable?

**
Martin

2009/12/9 hill180 hill...@gmail.com:
 Hello Group,

 Just a questions to get a point in the right direction.

 I have a Modal Window that opens when a Search AjaxLink is clicked.  All is
 Good There.

 The modal Window is a form which has a datatable which autoupdates on
 textfield.  No Problems there.

 The problem is the Navigation   1 2 3 4 5 6  

 When I click on the Navigation, the Model window closes.  When I click on
 the ajaxLink again, the Model opens at the page I clicked prior to the
 window closing.

 odd, not sure if this is the wrong component to use, or if I need to set
 some parameter to prevent the Model Window from closing.

 Thanks,

 joe.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Form submit error after upgrading to 1.4.1

2009-12-08 Thread Douglas Ferguson

I figured out that it has to do with required but not visible fields.

Is this already a known issue?

Also, I verified that it still exists in 1.4.4

D/

On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

 quickstart+jira issue.

 -igor

 On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Douglas Ferguson
 doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
 I've been having some upgrade woes.

 I tried to upgrade to 4.3 and got the wicket:enclosure error then I rolled 
 back to 4.1 and everything seemed fine, but I just found an error with a 
 form that wouldn't submit.
 I had a drop drop that was set to required and it was preventing the form 
 from submitting even though it had a valid value.

 This works fine in 4.0 but not in 4.1.

 D/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

2 ModalWIndows at once

I try to open two modal Windows at once

AjaxLink
onClick(AjaxRequestTarget) {
modal1.show(target);
modal2.show(target);
}

Both modal windows are Pages, no panels. Both modal windows are opened
as expected, modal2 above modal1. But when I close modal2 in IE, modal1
does not get the focus, my applicationis no more responding at all. In
FF, Chrome, Safari it works. After closing modal2, modal1 gets the
focus.

Is it forbidden to open 2 modal windows at once?

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Test (sorry)

Please ignore

unreachable john.mattu...@td.com

Every time I send an email to users@wicket.apache.org I receive the
message

 

  john.mattu...@td.com is not reachable

 TDGROUP #5.0.0 X-Notes;Invalid/unknown recipient [MAPI Reason Code: 1,
MAPI Diagnostic Code 1]

 

Am I the only one who gets this message?

 

Stefan

Re: Form submit error after upgrading to 1.4.1

check jira, and if its not in there its not knownplease open a
ticket and attach a quickstart.

-igor


On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Douglas Ferguson
doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
 I figured out that it has to do with required but not visible fields.

 Is this already a known issue?

 Also, I verified that it still exists in 1.4.4

 D/

 On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

 quickstart+jira issue.

 -igor

 On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Douglas Ferguson
 doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
 I've been having some upgrade woes.

 I tried to upgrade to 4.3 and got the wicket:enclosure error then I rolled 
 back to 4.1 and everything seemed fine, but I just found an error with a 
 form that wouldn't submit.
 I had a drop drop that was set to required and it was preventing the form 
 from submitting even though it had a valid value.

 This works fine in 4.0 but not in 4.1.

 D/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: unreachable john.mattu...@td.com

2009-12-08 Thread Jonas

That sounds really strange - I'd recommend a thorough virus scan of your box...

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote:
 Every time I send an email to users@wicket.apache.org I receive the
 message



      john.mattu...@td.com is not reachable

  TDGROUP #5.0.0 X-Notes;Invalid/unknown recipient [MAPI Reason Code: 1,
 MAPI Diagnostic Code 1]



 Am I the only one who gets this message?



 Stefan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: 2 ModalWIndows at once

opening two modals doesnt really make sense unless one is the parent
of the other...

-igor

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote:
 I try to open two modal Windows at once

        AjaxLink
                onClick(AjaxRequestTarget) {
                        modal1.show(target);
                        modal2.show(target);
                }

 Both modal windows are Pages, no panels. Both modal windows are opened
 as expected, modal2 above modal1. But when I close modal2 in IE, modal1
 does not get the focus, my applicationis no more responding at all. In
 FF, Chrome, Safari it works. After closing modal2, modal1 gets the
 focus.

 Is it forbidden to open 2 modal windows at once?

 Stefan

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: unreachable john.mattu...@td.com

2009-12-08 Thread Jonas

forget that, I just also received that message, but it was filtered out as spam

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Jonas barney...@gmail.com wrote:
 That sounds really strange - I'd recommend a thorough virus scan of your 
 box...

 On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote:
 Every time I send an email to users@wicket.apache.org I receive the
 message



      john.mattu...@td.com is not reachable

  TDGROUP #5.0.0 X-Notes;Invalid/unknown recipient [MAPI Reason Code: 1,
 MAPI Diagnostic Code 1]



 Am I the only one who gets this message?



 Stefan






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

AW: 2 ModalWIndows at once