NttPF
On 6/12/2020 6:35 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
I join NAX
I pay 1 coin to NAX
I transfer 30 coins to the NAX to create an order, specifying the
fulfillment condition of "transfer 1 Victory card to NAX".
On Saturday, June 13, 2020, nch via agora-discussion <
On 6/12/2020 11:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
That may work. Another thing I should've mentioned here: I'd strongly
encourage allowing contracts to own these. If players can only own one
then they'd need an intermediary if they wanted to trade an amulet for
On 6/11/2020 9:31 PM, nch wrote:
On 6/11/20 8:20 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
Enact a power-1 rule entitled "Amulets" with the following text:
Amulets are a class of assets, tracked by the Teasuror, which can be
owned by players. Each amulet has the
On 6/11/2020 9:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On Jun 11, 2020, at 21:20, ATMunn via agora-discussion
wrote:
On 6/11/2020 7:41 PM, nch wrote:
On 6/10/20 11:54 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
I've been rattling this idea around in my mind
)
- -
Coins Active player
= =
556 Aris
64 ATMunn
115 Baron Von Vaderham (BVV)
20 Bögtil
125 Cuddle Beam
1259 D. Margaux
98 Falsifian
793 G.
58 Gaelan
On 6/11/2020 7:41 PM, nch wrote:
On 6/10/20 11:54 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
I've been rattling this idea around in my mind for a bit. I decided to
put together a proto-proposal to see what others think.
Title: Amulets ver. 0.1
AI: 1.0
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s):
Overall, I'm
Did not know that. Very handy!
On 6/11/2020 6:53 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/11/20 5:41 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
Can I gripe for a sec? Bottom-posting generally does help readability
but can we maybe try to not quote entire 100+ line messages to add one
On 6/11/2020 3:28 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
What is the advantage of arbitration by contract over just having the
Referee / CFJ system handle things?
The Referee and judges didn't necessarily opt in to being involved in
every possible contract dispute (and it allows more
On 6/11/2020 2:15 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/11/2020 10:55 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
When an Arbitration Case is unassigned, the Head Arbitrator CAN by
announcement, and SHALL in a timely fashion, flip its Arbitrator to any
other value. The Arbitrator
tive kinds of stone which you might want to combine with your
list.
Ooh, this is definitely interesting. I will probably steal-er, take some
inspiration from some of these ideas.
Title: Amulets ver. 0.1
AI: 1.0
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s):
Enact a power-1 rule entitled "Amulets" wit
*ever
On 6/10/2020 9:46 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
not sure three words have never made me laugh more
On 6/10/2020 5:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
I ossify Agora.
not sure three words have never made me laugh more
On 6/10/2020 5:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
I ossify Agora.
indigo; and e got it because e published a thesis and earned a degree.
On 6/10/2020 3:33 PM, Stefan Fjellander via agora-discussion wrote:
wait how did e get the purple ribbon? Bögtil
Den ons 10 juni 2020 kl 21:30 skrev Alex Smith via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>:
On
GG, G.
On 6/10/2020 12:47 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
I award myself an Indigo ribbon.
I raise a banner!
(Super Mario music plays)
I've been rattling this idea around in my mind for a bit. I decided to
put together a proto-proposal to see what others think.
Title: Amulets ver. 0.1
AI: 1.0
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s):
Enact a power-1 rule entitled "Amulets" with the following text:
Amulets are a class of asset
On 6/10/2020 2:54 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:37 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion
wrote:
Potentially radical idea (but only once we've got started with Cards, don't
want two major reforms at once!): replace all the contract/promise/pledgy
things
On 6/9/2020 5:32 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
Sorry it's taken so long to get back to this thread. I kind of forgot
about this for a bit there.
On 2020-06-03 18:59, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 8:48 PM Reuben Staley via
oh gosh no
On 6/8/2020 9:05 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 5:56 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
[Juggling three distributions in my mind at once pls send help]
My official efficiency is rapidly increasing. Thoughts on the idea of
moving to
Gratuitous: the term "scam" isn't defined anywhere in the rules, nor in
this contract. CuddleBeam can claim eir contract has fewer scams all e
wants, but it won't change the text of the contract. FALSE, or possibly
IRRELEVANT.
On 6/8/2020 2:23 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
On Mon,
Loophole: I think that if I were to purchase and use a 龍 Scam
Banishment Ritual, this whole contract would disappear...
On 6/8/2020 11:27 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
I create the following Contract titled "The Mystical Menagerie":
.:*~*【THE MYSTICAL MENAGERIE】*~*:.
- humble
Thank you! Much appreciated.
On 6/8/2020 11:34 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/8/20 11:30 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
As I will soon be elected Notary, I have already begun the process of
working on my report. I think I have gotten all changes since the last
Notary
As I will soon be elected Notary, I have already begun the process of
working on my report. I think I have gotten all changes since the last
Notary report; however, if someone buried a pledge in a random thread, I
have missed it. If any such pledges were made, could someone please
bring them
I use Thunderbird personally and I know several other Agorans do as
well, so I would definitely recommend it.
On 6/7/2020 10:31 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On Sunday, June 7, 2020 9:26:22 PM CDT Nch via agora-business wrote:
Test message, please ignore. Sorry about sending something
Aris, I for one really appreciate what you've done for Agora. I admire
the time and effort you have put into the game over the years. I, too,
thought you were much older than you are just due to your maturity. I've
thought of you as a staple of the community since I joined. Serious
congrats on
On 6/7/2020 2:03 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/7/2020 10:49 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
I like FRCs, and I have really enjoyed that in the past, but I also
think that we should try to be experimental with tournaments given the
limited frequency with which
On 6/6/2020 10:54 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 6:59 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On Jun 6, 2020, at 21:51, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
I believe it's time to
I don't even know what the digests are lol
On 6/6/2020 6:09 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 2:50 PM Tyler M via agora-discussion
wrote:
I'd like my name to just be Tyler
FYI, replying to the digest is generally considered to be bad form
(among other
On 6/6/2020 1:17 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 12:08:48 PM CDT ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
The only other thing I'm wondering about is what class crime Robbery
should be. I went with 3 because 2 seems too low (it is robbery after
all), but 4 and above
On 6/6/2020 1:05 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
Title: Bank Robbery
AI: 1.0
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s):
Enact a rule entitled "Heists" with the following text:
{
At any time, any player CAN, by announcement, perform a Heist. Upon
doing so, e CAN transfer up to half of
On 6/6/2020 12:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/6/2020 9:33 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 10:18:59 AM CDT ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
There's absolutely no way this will pass, but I'm going to try it
anyways. Aris, I don't remember
On 6/6/2020 11:34 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 11:19 AM ATMunn via agora-business
wrote:
There's absolutely no way this will pass, but I'm going to try it
anyways. Aris, I don't remember exactly when the midweek distribution
deadline
.
04-May-20 01:44 nch flips eir master switch to emself.
07-May-20 00:43 Falsifian flips Tcbapo's master switch to Agora.
07-May-20 00:52 ATMunn is an excess lot: resale value decreased
07-May-20 00:52 Tcbapo is an excess lot: resale value decreased
07-May-20 00:52 pikhq is an excess lot: resale
what happens if both proposals pass with equal support?
On 6/4/2020 10:41 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
What do y'all think of these? If there's a strong consensus for one or
the other, I'll only submit that one.
-Aris
---
Title: Rule Violations (option 1)
Adoption index: 3.0
On 6/4/2020 3:20 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:14 AM Rebecca via agora-discussion
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:24 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:11 PM Kerim Aydin via
ah, got it :)
On 5/31/2020 8:20 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 5/31/20 8:17 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
what's this? this is new since I last payed attention to Agora
If you earn a ribbon that you already own, then you can get (# of
players who do not own
what's this? this is new since I last payed attention to Agora
On 5/31/2020 6:37 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-official
wrote:
Weekly Glitter Rewards (May 24 - May 31)
i really like this idea!
On 5/30/2020 3:37 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
Changes: Incorporated ais523's suggestions. Text and AI of a proposal are
explicitly protected from changes now, and used eir suggested "CAN... SHALL
NOT" phrasing for distributing proposals.
I submit the following
Sorry for my lack of participation in recent events. Here's why in a
nutshell:
recent events
-- --
-- --
- my -
head
|
|
/ \
Welcome to Agora, Jason Cobb!
On 6/1/2019 10:02 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I declare my intent to become a Player.
Jason Cobb
On 5/28/2019 11:19 AM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:>> For such
a decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the
adoption index is 3.0.
I'm fairly sure there are more essential parameters than that (although
some of them may be implied by the existence of an adoption index?).
that this current proposal is very oversimplified (it's been a
while since I've written a proposal) but I wanted to get the idea out there.
Title: "Hotfixes"
AI: 3.0
Author: ATMunn
Enact a new power-3 rule titled "Hotfixes" with the following text:
{
A hotfix is a piece of text whic
I really like this idea, actually. My only initial concern is that the
Power Stone may be too powerful.
On 5/20/2019 10:48 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Proto: Stones
[Reason: we need more things to auction. And vaguely topical.]
New Rules to be created:
Stones
A Stone is a unique
So basically, PAoaM but simplified down a bunch? I like this.
On 5/17/2019 10:27 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
This is actually a contract and a tournament, the contract existing
solely to help the iterative design I want to go for here. Here is the
rough draft:
= CONTRACT =
Definitions
I just recently finished school, so I thought I'd come back to Agora.
Dunno how active I'll be, but we'll see. It seems like my space idea has
gone over fairly well though. Anything else noteworthy since I was last
playing? (There's no way I'm going to go read through the 1000+ messages
lol)
So remember like 2 weeks ago when I said I would catch up on Agora over
the weekend or something? And then I didn't?
So yeah... I feel like I go through these "interest cycles," where I
find out about a thing, get really interested in it for a while, then
kinda start getting bored, and
Those were literally the words out of my mouth when I checked the Agora
folder.
Judging from the message subjects, it appears that we now have space and
politics. There's a lot of messages, which will take a while to go
through. Things have been a bit busy for me irl recently, which is why I
There's a chance I tried too hard on some of these. By the way the first
one isn't a reference to anything, it's literally the first thing that
came to my mind.
Jim "Banana Jim" Bennett
Napoleon Blownapart
Alexander the Mediocre
Kim Ping Pong
Loseston Churchvalley
On 1/13/2019 7:22 AM, Timon
This is very interesting! I would definitely play this.
One question though (and maybe you've already answered this, I haven't
read the other replies) - doesn't the Discard Pile need to be defined?
Or does it not because this is a tournament? If this was made with
rules, I assume it would have
On 1/3/2019 12:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> Also, this may vary depending
on rate of play, but maybe a "monthly
magazine" is a better model than a weekly journal - that gives long
enough to summarize e.g. the full proposing and implementation of a
proposal, or a full round of some subgame - three
Ok, good to know.
On 1/2/2019 9:23 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 21:20 -0500, ATMunn wrote:
During the holidays, I still checked my email, but didn't really pay
much attention to Agora (but there also wasn't much to pay attention
to). I'm sure I'm behind on reports
During the holidays, I still checked my email, but didn't really pay
much attention to Agora (but there also wasn't much to pay attention
to). I'm sure I'm behind on reports and stuff, and obviously haven't
been doing Agora Weekly. I will try to resume these soon.
One quick question though: Is
And the Gmail Stupidity strikes again. Good to know.
On 1/2/2019 2:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Actually I found the issue, it's Gmail. Gmail actually discards copies
of your own listserv messages that are delivered back to you "to save
you time" and instead tells you to use the copy in your
I feel like this same thing has happened to me. I thought it was a mail
client thing, but maybe not.
On 1/2/2019 2:00 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Actually, now you mention it, I do occasionally find that I don't receive my
own messages back, even though they show up on the website and
pong
On 12/31/2018 11:45 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Certificates seem to have expired on mailman. Pinging.
AGORA WEEKLY
Volume I 16 December, 2018 No. 02
PREVIOUSLY PROCURED
I thought that might have been the case. I wasn't sure what to say,
really, because I didn't want to make you look stupid, but I didn't want
the proposal to fail for no good reason :P
On 12/15/2018 5:02 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
ATMunn: I pasted the wrong thing and that's why it's the same
rote:
pf
On 12/15/18 2:21 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I retract the last one and submit this one:
Title: Happy Birthday To You Author: Trigon Coauthors: ATMunn AI:
1
Enact a new rule entitled "Birthday Gifts", power=1, with the
text: It is considered to be a player's Agoran Bir
The first sentence doesn't seem to make sense grammatically. "It is
considered ... when on the Agoran day e registered, if ..."
On 12/15/2018 3:09 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I am not sure if this is better, but whatever.
I submit the following proposal.
Title: Happy Birthday To You
Author:
oh crud, I need to judge this huh
On 12/15/2018 3:17 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
3690 called by twg 30 November 2018, assigned to ATMunn 2 December 2018: "G.
possesses at least one blot."
I remove ATMunn as judge of CFJ 3690. I assign this CFJ to ATMunn.
3691 called by Jacob
There have been like no messages in the last few days. I assume
everyone's just inactive, but I'm checking just to make sure something
hasn't gone horribly wrong.
, December 10, 2018 1:38 AM, ATMunn wrote:
I pledge that if there is a person who meets all following conditions
before 16 December 2018, I will place the text e wishes to advertise in
the December 16 Agora Weekly newspaper.
Conditions:
-Is active
-Has transferred a total number of coins
Prime Minister ATMunn 2018-10-302018-11-25
Promotor Aris 2016-10-212017-09-21
Refereetwg2018-11-012018-11-25
Registrar ATMunn 2018-11-142018-11-25
Rulekeepor Trigon 2018-10-142018-11-25
SpeakerD
CFJ 3690, that is.
On 12/2/2018 8:04 PM, ATMunn wrote:
What message thread was CFJ 2690 called under?
On 12/2/2018 8:02 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, twg wrote:
CFJ: "G. possesses at least one blot."
This is CFJ 3690. I assign it to ATMunn.
On Sun, 2 Dec 2
What message thread was CFJ 2690 called under?
On 12/2/2018 8:02 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, twg wrote:
CFJ: "G. possesses at least one blot."
This is CFJ 3690. I assign it to ATMunn.
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, Jacob Arduino wrote:
CFJ: "the last person to vote
It's in there?
On 12/2/2018 1:08 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Also, this doesn’t ratify, but it’s missing in the events section.
On Dec 2, 2018, at 6:55 AM, ATMunn wrote:
On 12/1/2018 3:06 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
CoE: My nichdel shenanigans are missing.
I accept this CoE and publish
Hey, thanks for taking this up. I had assumed everybody had forgotten
about it. This certainly is much nicer than anything else I could ever do.
On 12/2/2018 8:11 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Figured I'd pick this up and run with it since ATMunn said e lost interest. I
mainly just looked over
Did it get flipped to Agora? I see where D. Margaux makes the intent but
not where it is resolved.
On 12/1/2018 5:46 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Emself, then Agora, but yes
Gaelan
On Dec 1, 2018, at 12:17 PM, ATMunn wrote:
From what I can tell, the only thing this entails is nichdel's
From what I can tell, the only thing this entails is nichdel's master
switch being flipped to Agora, right?
On 12/1/2018 3:06 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
CoE: My nichdel shenanigans are missing.
On Dec 1, 2018, at 11:34 AM, ATMunn wrote:
[Hi, so I got elected to Registrar. I figured it would
Oh, oops. I guess my brain really wanted an extra R in there. Sorry
Jacob. Will be fixed in the next revision.
On 12/1/2018 2:54 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, ATMunn wrote:
12-Nov-18 15:54:54 Jacob Ardruino registers. Welcome, Jacob Ardruino!
[let me know if I missed
Having multiple columns is a cute idea, to be sure, but I think it would
make it less viewable to anyone not using a fixed-width email client all
the time.
Ah, I guess I just kind of assumed everybody used fixed-width clients.
I'll hold off on the multiple columns for now then. It also means
I had the idea recently to start up a sort of newspaper thing in which,
every week, I would publish the "paper" every Sunday to
agora-discussion. It would be formatted kind of like an actual
newspaper, potentially even with multiple columns and stuff.
The paper would include summaries of any
I submitted unconditional votes :)
On 11/29/2018 6:07 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
It would be nice if some more people could submit unconditional votes. I like
unconditional votes, they're remarkably easy to count.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 8:36
FYI, things such as voting and the like are usually sent to the
agora-business list, not agora-official. Official is really only used
for reports, and maybe some other office-related duties.
On 11/26/2018 6:17 PM, Jacob Arduino wrote:
Votes inline - Jacob Arduino
IDAuthor(s) AI
I award myself a Red Ribbon for Proposal 8129.
Ugh, I want to write some proposals. It's so hard to come up with ideas
though, but I guess I shouldn't force it.
Welcome to insanit- I mean fun!
On 11/12/2018 10:54 AM, Jacob Arduino wrote:
I hereby register as a player
- Jacob Arduino
Honestly, I've kind of lost interest in continuing my space proposal. If
someone else is interested, feel free to take it up and continue it from
where I've left off. If not, well...
Agora can't into space.
For some reason, this showed up as a separate email for me. For a second
I missed the "DIS: Re:" and thought you were trying to publish an ADoP
report.
On 11/4/2018 8:39 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
[twg intended to deputise for Referee on Nov 1, though
ade above is true.
>
> I point a finger at myself for oathbreaking and faking.
== Callers' messages ==
1 Nov 2018, ATMunn:
> I CFJ on the following statement: "VJ Rada violated No Faking in the
> below quoted message."
1 Nov 2018, twg:
> And I CFJ (linked with the be
at 5:45 PM, ATMunn wrote:
I CFJ on the following statement: "VJ Rada violated No Faking in the below quoted
message."
This is CFJ 3679. I assign it to Trigon.
On Nov 1, 2018, at 5:52 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
And I CFJ (linked with the below, please): "V.J.
Ribbons for participating in PAoaM and
can still claim them up until Saturday:
ATMunn
Corona
G.
Trigon
(I internally debated with myself about whether to remind you, but my
fairness-loving side won out.)
-twg
--
Trigon
I'm not going to do it, but now I kind of want to intentionally break a
minor rule just to see what apology words I have to use.
On 11/1/2018 11:43 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Nobody else having expressed interest, I deputise for the Referee to Impose the Cold Hand
of Justice by levying a
I had wondered if that might be a problem. Don't know how exactly how to
fix it though.
On 10/31/2018 9:36 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, ATMunn wrote:
Imminent Sector is an singleton switch, tracked by the Spacekeepor,
defaulting to 1. Every time a player receives
d ideas and I will probably implement them.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 1, 2018 1:31 AM, ATMunn wrote:
Comments on comments below.
On 10/31/2018 5:50 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Comments inline
Gaelan
On Oct 31, 2018, at 2:19 PM, ATMunn iamingodsa...@gmail.com w
Comments on comments below.
On 10/31/2018 5:50 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Comments inline
Gaelan
On Oct 31, 2018, at 2:19 PM, ATMunn wrote:
So I've been working on the space proposal some more. It's taken me a lot longer than I
thought it would, but I've made a ton of progress. I still have
nclude any more features, but I still want to get the core working
first. There's a changelog at the bottom, by the way.
Title: "spaaace? v0.2"
AI: 1
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s): [probably lots of people]
Enact a new rule entitled "Sectors", with power 1.0 and the followin
It's been a year? Oh, wow.
On 10/31/2018 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
[Marking the 1-year anniversary of zombies, that debuted last Halloween!]
I initiate a zombie auction, with the following lots (each zombie a
separate lot) ordered as follows (highest-bid first):
1. pokes
2. 天火狐
Agora is
There have been some recent-ish debates on whether or not subject line
actions actually work - I don't remember the exact state of that. So
there's a chance this was ineffective.
Either way, welcome!
On 10/31/2018 3:54 PM, Aharon Zingman wrote:
See the subject.
Idea that I might be up for doing: an unofficial "officer" that makes a
"report" every month with a summary of the current rules state, and
major changes since the last one. Basically a lower-effort, unofficial
version of Rulekeepor.
On 10/31/2018 1:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
About once
Kinda dark, but interesting. And since Agora has been going on for so
long and doesn't seem like it will stop anytime soon, even thought it
would be sad, it's not a complete impossibility.
On 10/29/2018 12:58 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
This randomly occurred to me recently.
Rule 869/44
---
8112 G., ATMunn 1.0 The Middle Way
FOR
8113 Trigon 1.0 Auction cleanup
PRESENT. I think I prefer complex but tested rules over simpler but potentially
buggy rules, but not strongly enough to vote AGAINST. Willing to change my vote
if I hear something
Fair points. It just doesn't quite feel right to me. I might change my
vote, maybe not.
On 10/28/2018 10:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, ATMunn wrote:
8122 Murphy 3.0 Middle of the road
AGAINST, this doesn't have any actual effect at the moment and it just
I'd probably participate in this. One thing worth noting is that, don't
quote me on this, but I don't think parties are a rule-defined term anymore.
On 10/27/2018 8:15 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
...here's another idea I've been toying with for a while:
This document is a contract between
Comments on comments below, but in a nutshell: Stuff will get fixed next
draft.
On 10/27/2018 7:27 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Feedback inline. I wrote most of the proposal feedback before reading other
comments, so some of this may be duplicated.
On Oct 15, 2018, at 6:13 PM, ATMunn wrote
On 10/27/2018 4:07 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
ATMunn wrote:
Enact a new rule entitled "Fame", with the following text:
{
Every player has a Fame switch, with possible values being all
integers between -10 and 10. Players with positive Fame are Famous,
and those with neg
Yeah, that bit was a bit iffy. But again, it seemed to kinda make sense
and I just wanted the CFJ to get judged, so that was what went in.
On 10/27/2018 3:06 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
Aris, sorry, I should have been clearer in my email.
I do agree with you about the contract existence and effect
I think a player who de-zombified emself is eligible for a welcome
package again.
On 10/27/2018 3:02 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Can you? I’ve been a player for a while.
Gaelan
On Oct 27, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh! And I award Gaelan a welcome package.
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018,
20 Sep 2018 Expunged
Aris -1 24 Sep 2018 Expunged
Corona +2(S) 28 Sep 2018 Late CFJ
Kenyon -1 28 Sep 2018 Expunged
Trigon -1 04 Oct 2018 Expunged
Trigon -1 09 Oct 2018 Expunged
ATMunn -1 11 Oct 2018
On the contrary, if I become elected, I will do everything within my
power to prevent any form of dictatorship, benevolent or not.
So, pro-dictatorships can vote D. Margaux; anti-dictatorships can vote
me. Neutrals can vote G., I guess.
On 10/27/2018 12:52 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
I suppose I’ll
ble, but I believe that even here exclusio
unius est exclusio alterius is almost always followed.
-ArisOn Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:21 PM ATMunn wrote:
Here is my judgement on CFJs 3665 and 3666. Hopefully my logic makes
sense and works. If not, though, I am open to changing my judgement. It
might
to confront that question.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 6:32 PM ATMunn <mailto:iamingodsa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Ah, thanks. For some reason when I opened it there were a bunch of
extra
blank lines, but after removing those it checked out. The original
issue
might have been
201 - 300 of 828 matches
Mail list logo
