Hi Juergen--
>I had installed amanda on a tape server and there amanda is running fine.
>Now, I want to be install amanda on a client running under Kernel 2.2.17, so
>that the tape server can backup the client.
>I have decompressed the sources on the client and i´m not shure which options
>i need
Hi!
I had installed amanda on a tape server and there amanda is running fine.
Now, I want to be install amanda on a client running under Kernel 2.2.17, so
that the tape server can backup the client.
I have decompressed the sources on the client and i´m not shure which options
i need to configur
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
> Sorry, I haven't messed with this myself. I'm currently staring at
> the Linux docs trying to figure out if I have to use ioctl in order
> to turn h/w compression on and off there.
Should be able to do it with mt(1). At least
This is definitely not about the development of Amanda, so I'm leaving
amanda-hackers out.
On Feb 6, 2001, Brian Leverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I find that the 'record no' option is causing failures for
> the DEC Unix 'ufs' dumps.
What are the errors you get in the e-mail repor
After looking at quite a bit of the post to
amanda-users it seems as though that a lot of people
has trouble understanding which /dev/ to use
for amanda. I know for me setting up a changer under
RedHat 7.0 was a bit tough due to never having used
scsi devices under Linux before.
Maybe in the "Dum
On Feb 5, 2001, Tal Ovadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> amrestore /dev/nst0 machine.kuku.com /site | restore -i
^ add `-p' here
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD s
On Feb 6, 2001, tomas morhac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and in the /tmp/amanda (client) is no sendbackup.debug
How about sendsize.debug? That's the one that's created during
estimation.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer
"John R. Jackson" wrote:
> I've been given the "opportunity" :-) to update the Amanda chapter
> web pages at www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html, so now would be a good
> time for everyone to toss in their comments on what it should contain
> (keeping in mind that every minute I'm typing HTML is on
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, John R. Jackson wrote:
> >which man page are you reading here? :)
>
> www.freebsd.org
I think he meant man page for which command. (You overlooked saying
in your last message.) I imagine you're looking at mt(1) which
contains:
comp Set compression mode. There a
>which man page are you reading here? :)
www.freebsd.org
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If i have a file system that is, when compressed, larger then my tape
size, what happens? from what I read, it can't span a file system across
two tapes, but I might be mis-remembering what I read ...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Admin
>If i have a file system that is, when compressed, larger then my tape
>size, what happens? from what I read, it can't span a file system across
>two tapes, but I might be mis-remembering what I read ...
You're not mis-remembering. Amanda cannot handle this yet. I have
started on the project t
- Original Message -
From: "John R. Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ryan Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Shawn M. Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: Amanda Client on FreeBSD
Like I said not an expert, the first 4 ti
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, John R. Jackson wrote:
> >I have a DLT2000 (is that 5/10 or 15/30?) ...
>
> If I'm reading the www.quantum.com web page right, it's 10/20 if you
> use DLT-III tapes and 15/30 if you use DLT-III-XT.
>
> >will it automatically use
> >hardware compression under FreeBSD, or, like
I have compiiled and installed the latest Amanda 2.4.2p1 for an
installation of DEC Unix 4.0b to 4.0d, HP-UX, Solaris, Irix, and NT
(Samba) workstations. Amanda successfully backs up 70+ file systems from
these platforms to the default 'DailySet1', with a dumpcycle of 4 weeks,
runspercycle of 20,
A few thoughts: (Some of these might be silly or obvious)
In http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda-2.html:
- Explain why appending to tape is a bad idea
In http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda-4.html:
- "Some operating system distributions provide pre-compiled versions
of AMANDA, b
I don't know if this qualifies as an actual suggestion or not, but here
goes. Don't lose the messages in the details. Perhaps start the chapter
with a "Dummies" section on how to do a basic backup with Amanda and how to
do a basic restore. Then dive off into the details of each part of the proc
I've been given the "opportunity" :-) to update the Amanda chapter
web pages at www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html, so now would be a good
time for everyone to toss in their comments on what it should contain
(keeping in mind that every minute I'm typing HTML is one I won't be
typing Amanda code or
>... Now amcheck complains that
>/etc/amandates and /usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/. are
>missing on all machines. Surely, I could generate it manually, but
>where did I do a mistake? ...
You didn't make a mistake. These are expected to be created by hand.
The Amanda user typically does
>... When i
>change the dumptype for the Linux PC's e.g. to comp-user i get the error
>messages
>/inst lev 0 FAILED [disk /inst offline on tux2?]
What happens when you run amcheck (please post **all** the messages)?
What's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug on the client?
>I read in the FAQ, that th
>I have a file system that comes in at just over 15gig, that amanda is
>saying is to big for my 15/30 drive ...
What is your tapetype set to? Is Amanda saying this file system by
itself is too big, or it in addition to the others in the run is too big?
Any chance of increasing runtapes to 2 and
>I have a DLT2000 (is that 5/10 or 15/30?) ...
If I'm reading the www.quantum.com web page right, it's 10/20 if you
use DLT-III tapes and 15/30 if you use DLT-III-XT.
>will it automatically use
>hardware compression under FreeBSD, or, like Solaris, do I have to use
>special devices for this?
Th
>> With 1 single tape, you have a single point of failure (that tape).
>
>No, not really. He'd have to lose both the disk and the tape in
>order to lose the data. Not that it can't happen, but it's not a
>single point of failure.
Actually, all you'd have to lose is the one file you really, real
John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>/etc/dumpdates doesn't exist on a Debian installation, it's
>>/var/lib/dumpdates.
>
>Sigh.
>
>Do you think Amanda should be checking if either exist rather than just
>the one name? Or should it try to figure out at ./configure time which
>way to go?
.
>>ERROR: debian: [can not read/write /etc/dumpdates: No such file or
>>directory]
>
>/etc/dumpdates doesn't exist on a Debian installation, it's
>/var/lib/dumpdates.
Sigh.
Do you think Amanda should be checking if either exist rather than just
the one name? Or should it try to figure out at ./c
Hi,
I plan to switch from dump to tar, because with one out of six
computers, dump doesn't work (I've given up to find out) and,
because I've heard, that tar is more reliable on systems where the
data is changing fast.
So, I changed my entries in disklist from nocomp-root to root-tar
and fro
Hi,
i know it is possible, i'm doing it for some packages,
but you need to know very good what you are doing.
For example i have seen alien messing up all
permisions for the files in an rpm-package completly,
making the resulting .dpkg completly unusable.
And with rpm you loose all dependencies
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:41:19AM +0100)
> Hi all
>
> I've got the problem with this:
>
> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> machinesda2 lev 0 FAILED [Request to machine timed out.]
> machinesdc1 lev 0 FAILED [Request to machine timed out.]
>
Another, but i hope the last question belongs to amanda.
I use amanda for backup 2 Linux PC's (one as Server and Client, and one
installed only as client). Then i have a NT Workstation PC. When i backup up
files on all 3 PC's with dumptype comp-user-tar backup works fine. When i
change the dumpty
Hi,
ok, i checked it a bit deeper and found the following:
if you need large files (>2GB) under linux, the simplest solution
is yust to install kernel-2.4.1 . it supports large files for all
filesystems, and amanda detects it correct at configure-time.
Christoph
"John R. Jackson" schrieb:
>
> >
* tomas morhac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 04:30:00PM +0100)
> >
> > You are using gnutar.
> > It's slow (es. an incremental with gzip compression)
> > Make sure you have set your timeout to something large
> >
> > I have dtimeout set to 1800 .
> >
> > Also, did you check /tmp/ama
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:30:36PM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
> Hi,
> sorry to interupt,but debian does not use rpm packageformat.
> it has it own format called dpkg, so www.rpmfind.com is a bad idea...
No, it's not necessarilly a bad idea. You can still use RPMs with Debian.
Either by ins
has anyone looked into this? basically, as the amanda user, I can do a
chio, but using amlable it fails?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.or
>
> You are using gnutar.
> It's slow (es. an incremental with gzip compression)
> Make sure you have set your timeout to something large
>
> I have dtimeout set to 1800 .
>
> Also, did you check /tmp/amanda on the client for debug files
> (sendbackup.*.debug ) ?
> If so, what's in the last (ti
I have a file system that comes in at just over 15gig, that amanda is
saying is to big for my 15/30 drive ... I have it set as a nocomp-user
right now, since i want to use hardware comopression as much as possible
over software ... is there any way of defining a 'type' that will do
nocomp, but if
How?
I have a DLT2000 (is that 5/10 or 15/30?) ... will it automatically use
hardware compression under FreeBSD, or, like Solaris, do I have to use
special devices for this?
Thanks ...
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
scrappy@{pos
Hi all!
Mitch wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
>
> > if you're data is important enough to back it up,
> > it's also important enough to buy a few more tapes.
>
> agreed, but...
>
> > With 1 single tape, you have a single point of failure (that tape).
>
> No, no
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
> if you're data is important enough to back it up,
> it's also important enough to buy a few more tapes.
agreed, but...
> With 1 single tape, you have a single point of failure (that tape).
No, not really. He'd have to lose both the dis
unsubscribe amanda-users
begin:vcard
n:Broderick;Don
tel;pager:(412)644-1708
tel;fax:(412)237-3091
tel;work:(412)237-3152
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Community College of Allegheny County;Information Technology Services
adr:;;800 Allegheny Avenue;Pittsburgh;PA;15233;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[
Adolfo Pach&sgr;n wrote:
>
> planner: Last full dump of server:/home on tape Diaria-000 overwritten on
> this run.
> planner: Last full dump of server://javierpuech/Documentos on tape
> Diaria-000 overwritten on this run.
>
This tells you that you have two full dumps on this tape and they a
* Adolfo Pachón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:07:35PM +0100)
> Christoph Scheeder has told me that I can't use only one tape for backing up
> all the days of the week. Can anybody suggest me a solution? By the moment,
> I can´t pay more tapes.
if you're data is important enough to
Christoph Scheeder has told me that I can't use only one tape for backing up
all the days of the week. Can anybody suggest me a solution? By the moment,
I can´t pay more tapes.
Thanks
Hi,
i think you expect amanda to put backups of multiple days on one tape,
do you?
if this is true you are completley wrong.
Amanda needs one tape for every day's backup, no matter how many data
you backup.
(at least if you don`t patch it to append to tapes,
there is a patch for doing that flowt
Stan Brown wrote:
>
> ERROR: debian: [can not access /dev/hdc1 (hdc1): Permission denied]
> ERROR: debian: [can not access /dev/hda1 (hda1): Permission denied]
> ERROR: debian: [can not access /dev/hda3 (hda3): Permission denied]
...
> brw-rw1 root disk 3, 1 Nov 30 10:
Hi all
My system is an amanda2.4.2pl with an HP COLORADO 4/8 GB IDE (working with
ide-scsi module). The backups are daily, with only one tape, for the moment.
The daily amount data average of entire backup is 400 MB. I'm doing copies
for the linux server and the windows clients, via Samba. I use
Hi all
I've got the problem with this:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
machinesda2 lev 0 FAILED [Request to machine timed out.]
machinesdc1 lev 0 FAILED [Request to machine timed out.]
It's a linux machine where sda2 is / directory and sdc1 is raid.
On the sda2 is only system, so
The 2.2.x kernels don't support by default files larger than 2Gb, but you
can apply a patch called 'LFS' or you can download the lattest kernel from
the 2.4.x series, that includes the patch into the kernel.
The Debian 2.4.x kernels can be found at www.valinux.com...
At:
ftp://ftp.valin
* John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:59:56PM -0500)
>>2. quoting a colocation facilitys website:
>>"We use bzip2 instead of gzip for data compression. ...
> This comes up here about once a month :-). There was a lengthy discussion
> last November. Quoting Alexandre O
Stan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm just seting up my first Linux (Debian Potato) box in a while.
(...)
>ERROR: debian: [can not read/write /etc/dumpdates: No such file or
>directory]
/etc/dumpdates doesn't exist on a Debian installation, it's
/var/lib/dumpdates.
Maybe a symlink will work
49 matches
Mail list logo