ubl you asked for input, I don't see what your issue is with Adam's
comments (seemed perfectly reasonable to me). Perhaps you will please
let us know what you find out, when you have tried out your power
supply project? Questions like yours seem to come up often around here.
--
NewBuyer
tingtong5 wrote:
When using this calibration file with drc the sound becomes way too
bright. So I reversed all the values (plus - minus and vice versa) but
then the sound became too dull (lack of high frequencies).
Ive just started trying drc too (family is out of the house all weekend -
I've just upgraded from an SB3 to Transporter and am also experiencing
some crackles/pops during tracks. I've done some testing found the
following:
1) It's specific tracks only and is repeatable
2) It occurs on both the analogue and spdif out on the Transporter
3) It does not occur on the SB3
muski;221338 Wrote:
Tingtong --
Where did you get your mic calibrated?
muski
In germany (I live in holland):
http://lasip.hifi-selbstbau.de/cgi-bin/shop/shop.cgi?shop=product=Kalibrierungcart_id=2692111.29825
--
tingtong5
I did got some answers lately:
- the calibration file I got equals the frequency response of my
microphone
- DRC also needs a microphone frequency response file
In other words I could use my calibration file directly with DRC :-)
So I did new measurements and created new filters. The
Toby Dickenson;221436 Wrote:
Ive just started trying drc too (family is out of the house all weekend
-
serious measurement begins tomorrow 8-).
Sounds like big fun :-) Good luck and let us know how you went!
Toby Dickenson;221436 Wrote:
You may get some insight from
graphing the
tingtong5;221478 Wrote:
I did got some answers lately:
- the calibration file I got equals the frequency response of my
microphone
- DRC also needs a microphone frequency response file
In other words I could use my calibration file directly with DRC :-)
So I did new measurements
Phil Leigh;221486 Wrote:
The too bright sound won't be an issue with your current soundcard -
the fact that it is resampling 48-44.1 won't make that much difference
in this context.
I agree, but it could be caused by a non lineair f-response of my cheap
soundcard, so buying a better card
tingtong5;221493 Wrote:
I agree, but it could be caused by a non lineair f-response of my cheap
soundcard, so buying a better card might still be a good idea..
I know, I was already using a curve that rolls off 8 dB at 20 kHz :P
Still too bright..
I already asked and Inguz said his
Phil Leigh;221514 Wrote:
My point was that the response (which is nothing to do with whether or
not the card is re-sampling) will be flat enough for DRC purposes - you
can't hear freq response variations +/- 0.5dB anyway.
You need to roll-off way earlier than that. Cymbals are in the
cliveb;221132 Wrote:
The point of this reclocker is the same as everything else sold by
Empirical Audio: to part credulous audiophiles from their money (in
large chunks preferably).
Yes, just like SD got people to pay $1700. more for a SB3 with a few
upgrades in a fancy box called the
11 matches
Mail list logo
