Trent Shipley wrote:
Nick, is this what you are saying?
Spammer compromises customer's computer (actually many customers' computers,
preferably through a Trojan EULA that makes the whole thing legal).
No, not legal. Spam isn't legal!
I really do not get that angry with spammers. They are just ra
> Behalf Of Nick Arnett
>
> > I really do not get that angry with spammers. They are
> just rational entrepreneurs.
>
> Bleah. If spamming isn't unethical, what is?
Whoever said that rational entrepreneurs are all ethical? An awful
lot of business people I have seen seem to have the opinion
Horn, John wrote:
Behalf Of Nick Arnett
I really do not get that angry with spammers. They are
just rational entrepreneurs.
Bleah. If spamming isn't unethical, what is?
Whoever said that rational entrepreneurs are all ethical? An awful
lot of business people I have seen seem to have the opini
On Feb 6, 2005, at 10:45 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
Robert wrote:
An iPod loader can earn several hundred dollars for converting a large
collection, but hour by hour, the money is modest. Transferring a
single full-length CD takes five to nine minutes on a standard
computer, which means that most co
On Feb 6, 2005, at 10:46 PM, David Land wrote:
Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002172407_mars06.ht
ml
http://tinyurl.com/58hnw
Global warming may be a scourge on Earth, but injecting greenhouse
gases into the atmosphere of Mars might be just the thing t
On Feb 6, 2005, at 10:17 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
And that comes right after AOL claimed that spam was going down and
that everybody was saying that spammers had given up… It seems that
spammers have adapted. How can they use the ISP's infrastructure and
why can't the ISPs
- Original Message -
From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: IPod Loading
On Feb 6, 2005, at 10:45 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
Robert wrote:
An iPod loader can earn several hundred dollars for converting a
Eliminate Windows and you'll eliminate spam. As well as proximally all
viruses extant today.
"So what your saying is that, programers wouldnt be able to create a viris
that could infect a mac OS?, or any other os that is not windows based?"
LMAO im sorry this is about the funniest thing that i ah
On Feb 7, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Nick Lidster wrote:
Eliminate Windows and you'll eliminate spam. As well as proximally all
viruses extant today.
"So what your saying is that, programers wouldnt be able to create a
viris that could infect a mac OS?, or any other os that is not windows
based?"
I'd lik
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
The ultimate source of these problems is at least partly a corruptible
operating system. A class-action suit against Microsoft would go a long
way toward addressing spam, since UNIX, Linux, BSD and Mac systems don't
have these kinds of security issues.
I wish it were so...
On Feb 7, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:
The truth in what you say is that a properly configured Unix-ish
system is more secure than a properly configured Windows machine.
Unfortunately, there seems to be little shortage of misconfigured
systems.
That's a better formulation of it, yes. T
Warren,
On Feb 7, 2005, at 9:15 AM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Feb 6, 2005, at 10:46 PM, David Land wrote:
And why not? "Left Behind"-reading, Biblical-literalist eco-terrorists
are plotting the demise of Earth in order to force God's hand and
bring
about the end of days anyway.
Oh? Have you heard
I love how age is brought in so soon. wow.. im a KID.. lol thx that
actualy made my day :)
- Original Message -
From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: SpamAdaption
On Feb 7, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Nic
From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Cat-astrophe (was: E-mail program questions)
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:50:25 -0800 (PST)
For behaviors/places it isn't workable, I use "The
Enforcer"a squirt gun filled with water and a
why not jsut turn their logic around on them and say that wouldnt god want
all of amn to be saved... and if you want to hasten his return would you not
also be condemed to the hellfires with the sinners?
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Land" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussio
On Feb 7, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Nick Lidster wrote:
why not jsut turn their logic around on them and say that wouldnt god
want all of amn to be saved... and if you want to hasten his return
would you not also be condemed to the hellfires with the sinners?
A fair question, Nick.
I'm not sure that logic
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
Um. Years ago I had a button that read, "Dear lord, please protect me
from your followers." However, I'd appeal to something a little closer
to material reality for help. ;)
Hmm. Despite... or perhaps because... I'm Christian, I think I could wear
that button, too.
But I'
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
I often get emails spoofed from unsecured mailers, many of which seem to
report as being 'nix. That's just plain sloppiness on the part of those
machines' sysadmins.
And that's different from Windows' security issues how? ;-)
I'll guess that the answer is that at least Uni
> Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ticia wrote:
> >>Deborah Harrell wrote:
> >>>Warren Ockrassa wrote:
> >>>Isn't pee supposed to be good for jellyfish
> stings?
> >>I seem to recall that it might help with the pain
> from
> >>some type of marine sting...but I'll look into
> >>that
On 7 Feb 2005, at 8:26 pm, Nick Arnett wrote:
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
I often get emails spoofed from unsecured mailers, many of which seem
to report as being 'nix. That's just plain sloppiness on the part of
those machines' sysadmins.
And that's different from Windows' security issues how? ;-)
I
Deborah Harrell wrote:
...
While my diver friends swear by the 'urine fix' (if
you're hours out from shore/medical attention, you'll
do what you gotta...) for seabather's eruption
(jellyfish larvae stings), this site advises against
it:
http://my.webmd.com/hw/health_guide_atoz/aa121164.asp
However,
William T Goodall wrote:
The main human error being at Microsoft, in the design of Windows. An OS
deliberately designed to ignore the accumulated wisdom of decades in
regard to computer security.
Deliberately???
Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/
maru wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
...
While my diver friends swear by the 'urine fix' (if
you're hours out from shore/medical attention, you'll
do what you gotta...) for seabather's eruption
(jellyfish larvae stings), this site advises against
it:
http://my.webmd.com/hw/health_guide_atoz/aa121164.
Nick Arnett wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
The main human error being at Microsoft, in the design of Windows. An
OS deliberately designed to ignore the accumulated wisdom of decades
in regard to computer security.
Deliberately???
Nick
Yep. To make it easy to use.
'Make an OS any fool can use...
Nick Lidster wrote:
I love how age is brought in so soon. wow.. im a KID.. lol thx
that actualy made my day :)
I was too, till not that long ago. And I never made the mistake of
thinking that Windows is as inherently secure, or more so, as any other
mainstream OS. That's just foolish.
And
On Feb 7, 2005, at 4:53 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
The main human error being at Microsoft, in the design of Windows. An
OS deliberately designed to ignore the accumulated wisdom of decades
in regard to computer security.
Deliberately???
That might be the correct word. I'm no
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
That might be the correct word. I'm not sure what else could be used to
describe how VBS was given total system integration from the beginning,
with hooks into (more ore less literally) every portion of the OS. IIRC
there were more than a few people, in the pre-95 days, wh
For those who still hypnotoze themselves that "Surplus Bill" Clinton
was in some way more of an out of control spendthrift than the
present gang of looters
Bush revealed his fiscal 2006 budget today and, not surprisingly, it
is a fraud. The NY Times has an excellent analysis:
http://www.
At 05:39 PM Monday 2/7/2005, Deborah Harrell wrote:
> Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ticia wrote:
> >>Deborah Harrell wrote:
> >>>Warren Ockrassa wrote:
> >>>Isn't pee supposed to be good for jellyfish
> stings?
> >>I seem to recall that it might help with the pain
> from
> >>some
At 05:52 PM Monday 2/7/2005, maru wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
...
While my diver friends swear by the 'urine fix' (if
you're hours out from shore/medical attention, you'll
do what you gotta...) for seabather's eruption
(jellyfish larvae stings), this site advises against
it:
http://my.webmd.com/h
Warren wrote:
Of course, to do that you'd have to have an MP3 version of every
possible song ever.
Even just the most popular music would save a lot of time and every time
somebody asked you to load what you didn't already have you would just add
it to your db.
Of course you might end up with
On Feb 7, 2005, at 8:51 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
Warren wrote:
Of course, to do that you'd have to have an MP3 version of every
possible song ever.
Even just the most popular music would save a lot of time and every
time somebody asked you to load what you didn't already have you would
just add
Ronn! wrote:
Meat tenderizer contains enzymes which are intended to break down some
of the proteins in the muscle tissue that forms the meat, thus making it
more tender. It works to break down other proteins, too, such as the
proteinaceous components of venom.
I was at a Port Canaveral, Fla. b
33 matches
Mail list logo
