-Caveat Lector-
From: "Kindred Spirit" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It has always been my understanding that "Caveat
Lector" was there for a reason before each post and
that a person could post something and not expect to
be attacked personally because of the content of the
post.
Then you really are
-Caveat Lector-
I am NOT and have never claimed to be a "Native
American." I AM a North American Native. You have
called many people Colleen. I think you and Prudy are
the same person but I do not care for you are full of
shit as both people. According to you, who seem to
make the rules now,
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Kindred Spirit" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it "appars to ALL THE WORLD" that I have called
somebody a "coon" why did no one else attack me?
Because no one wanted to grant your post any suggestion of dignity that it did not
deserve by wasting
bandwidth replying to it...
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Prudence L. Kuhn" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're absolutely right, June, and I hear they're going to do away with
coffee breaks too. Prudy
If you truly equate coffee breaks with what Clinton and Lewinsky did, there is
obviously nothing more to
say...
Other than the rest of
-Caveat Lector-
If it "appars to ALL THE WORLD" that I have called somebody a "coon"
why did no one else attack me?
I got there first. The other people were apparently polite enough not to
waste bandwidth with a bunch of dittos.
you, NESSIE are a LIAR. I did not call anybody anything.
-Caveat Lector-
Nessie, June and Prudy,
It has always been my understanding that "Caveat
Lector" was there for a reason before each post and
that a person could post something and not expect to
be attacked personally because of the content of the
post. If an articel calls somebody a name that
y Theory Research List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Nessie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First
Act,
Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Caveat Lector-
Yet those wanting to detract from him act as though
this ju
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/22/2001 7:45:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Driving while drinking at that time
was not taken as seriously as it should have been but
we should compare Clinton's youth to Bush's youth and
NOT Clinton as an adult to Bush as a yo
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/22/2001 10:47:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They had nicknames
I can't recall, and I'm sure not going to put their real names on the net.
Ask around, dear, I'm still not going to put their names on the net; although
I got them
-Caveat Lector-
They had nicknames
I can't recall, and I'm sure not going to put their real names
on the net.
Ask around, dear, I'm still not going to put their names on the
net; although
I got them (not from the inner circles) from the magazine section of my
Sunday paper a couple
-Caveat Lector-
On 23 Jan 2001, at 5:27, Prudence L. Kuhn wrote:
Ask around, dear, I'm still not going to put their names on the net;
although I got them (not from the inner circles) from the magazine
section of my Sunday paper a couple of years ago. I had forgotten
them. It didn't seem
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Nessie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apples and oranges. Bush endangered lives, maybe yours, maybe mine, and
definitely his own. Clinton had sex. Nobody got hurt from Clinton
having sex with Monica
So, you don't think Clinton's wife and daughter were hurt by his marital
-Caveat Lector-
On 23 Jan 2001, at 10:38, Ynr Chyldz Wyld wrote:
A public official, whose salary is paid for by the taxpayer, who
instead of conducting the duties of his job during working hours
engages in sexual hankypanky with an underling, such escapades taking
place in a public
-Caveat Lector-
Most people acknowledge the "follies of youth."
By that logic, we ought to turn the Manson gang loose. After all, they
were pretty young at the time they killed those people.
Nobody cares about Clinton's sex life!
That is patently false. He wouldnt have lied about it if
-Caveat Lector-
So, you don't think Clinton's wife and daughter were hurt by his
marital infidelity?
maybe, maybe not. It depends on their attitude.
According to many religions, sex under the circumstances that Clinton
and Lewinsky engaged in it IS 'immoral'.
That doesnt make it immoral.
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/23/2001 8:44:09 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We shouldn't have to "ask around" - you made the allegations, it is
up to _you_ to provide the proof - just as you demand of the other
listmembers.
You must have me mixed up with
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/23/2001 11:11:30 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A public official, whose salary is paid for by the taxpayer, who instead
of conducting the duties of his job
during working hours engages in sexual hankypanky with an underling, such
-Caveat Lector-
Nessie,
"FWD" just means "Forwarded" and is not a disclaimer
and is automatic on most of the software I have ever
used."FYI"has to at least be typed in. Now why would
a person type that in if it did not mean something.
It means something is just being sent along for
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/21/2001 6:04:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then what you're saying is you have knowledge of the hidden history of the
Whitehouse well enough to know which former Presidents indulged in the act
of Oral Sex in the Oval Office. I'm
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/21/2001 6:37:01 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
People bitch yet everybody
wants to drive that new SUV or 4x4 that keeps sucking up all that gas.
I don't know who was waiting where, but my old Toyota gets 42 miles to the
gallon.
Nohava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks
Clinton Orders
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Caveat Lector-
Get your priorities straight.
I've seen your posts here and your opinions...you
should get your morals
straight! I quite agree on the alcohol abuse
-Caveat Lector-
Yet those wanting to detract from him act as though this just happened
the way Clinton's sexcapades did.
Apples and oranges. Bush endangered lives, maybe yours, maybe mine, and
definitely his own. Clinton had sex. Nobody got hurt from Clinton
having sex with Monica till the
.
-Original Message-
From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Prudence L. Kuhn
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/21/2001 6
in the most powerful office on
the planet?
-Original Message-
From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Nessie
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 1:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector
-Caveat Lector-
Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think he lied about it, he never
brought it
to the forefront, much like Clinton and his sexual escapades (legacy). I
wonder if he'll keep with recently created tradition in the Whitehouse
of
having dignitaries wait while he has oral sex in the
AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector-
Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think he lied about it, he never
brought it
to the forefront, much like Clinton and his sexual escapades (legacy). I
wonder if he'll keep with recently created tradition in the
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/21/2001 7:53:22 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think he lied about it, he never brought
it
to the forefront, much like Clinton and his sexual escapades (legacy). I
wonder if he'll keep with recently
-Caveat Lector-
Bravo, hollie thomas!!! I agree
sno0wl
On 21 Jan 01, at 11:43, hollie thomas wrote:
Sex, on the other hand, is nobodys business except for the persons
actually involved. A case could be made that if doing it in the office
somehow impaired Clintons ability to do his
involved. Could you give us a quick run
down on these people?
-Original Message-
From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Prudence L. Kuhn
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks
In a message dated 1/21/01 3:32:49 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bravo, hollie thomas!!! I agree
I also agree wholeheartedly...good post Miss Hollie!!
Bill.
: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Nessie
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector-
Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think he lied about it, he never
brought
-Caveat Lector-
like Clinton is the only one to ever haave sex /oral in whitehouse ,
come on...
What You know becomes a belief as soon
as it is expressed ...
Sounds like conjecture.
A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion
http://live.altavista.com/e?efi=467ei=2364195ern=y
In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
Deborah Charles
01/20/01
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Moving quickly upon taking office, President George
W. Bush on
-Caveat Lector-
``Everyone who enters into public service for the United States has a
duty to the American people to maintain the highest standards of
integrity in government,'' Bush said in the memo.
This from a guy who drove drunk, got busted and lied about it.
Integrety? Gimme a break.
A
34 matches
Mail list logo
