Am 08/13/2016 10:39 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/13/2016 09:46 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 08/13/2016 06:24 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/13/2016 07:00 AM, Marcus wrote:
Here are my tests:
Linux 32-bit:
- ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed
- MD5, SHA1 are OK [1]
- ZIP ASC is OK (signature fr
On 08/13/2016 09:46 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 08/13/2016 06:24 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>
>> On 08/13/2016 07:00 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>> Here are my tests:
>>>
>>> Linux 32-bit:
>>>
>>> - ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed
>>> - MD5, SHA1 are OK [1]
>>> - ZIP ASC is OK (signature from Kay Schenk)
>
Am 08/13/2016 06:24 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/13/2016 07:00 AM, Marcus wrote:
Here are my tests:
Linux 32-bit:
- ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed
- MD5, SHA1 are OK [1]
- ZIP ASC is OK (signature from Kay Schenk)
- Library ASC is OK (signature from Ariel Constenla-Haile)
Linux 64-b
On 08/13/2016 07:00 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Here are my tests:
>
> Linux 32-bit:
>
> - ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed
> - MD5, SHA1 are OK [1]
> - ZIP ASC is OK (signature from Kay Schenk)
> - Library ASC is OK (signature from Ariel Constenla-Haile)
>
> Linux 64-bit:
>
> - ZIP file is OK
Here are my tests:
Linux 32-bit:
- ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed
- MD5, SHA1 are OK [1]
- ZIP ASC is OK (signature from Kay Schenk)
- Library ASC is OK (signature from Ariel Constenla-Haile)
Linux 64-bit:
- ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed
- MD5, SHA1 are OK [1]
- ZIP ASC is OK
Am 08/13/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 08/12/2016 10:01 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
[Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the
4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to c
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 08/12/2016 10:01 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>
>> On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> [Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the
>>> 4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system beca
On 12 Aug, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 14:41
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; ksch...@apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Bina
Am 08/12/2016 10:01 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
[Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the
4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system because of a
defect in the .md5 file. For reasons unknown, the md5sum t
On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
[Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the
4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system because of a
defect in the .md5 file. For reasons unknown, the md5sum tool that I
have requires exactly two spaces between
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 14:41
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; ksch...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
> Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for W
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 08/11/2016 09:50 PM, schrieb Kay sch...@apache.org:
>
>>
>> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>> [top posting]
>>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
>>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as inst
Am 08/11/2016 09:50 PM, schrieb Kay sch...@apache.org:
On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
[top posting]
I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" i
On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>
>
> On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> [top posting]
>>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
>>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructi
Kay Schenk wrote:
My openssl version on does NOT supply digest sha256. Is it OK to use
sha1? MD5 already computed for each of these.
Guidelines recommend SHA256. But it should not be difficult for you to
get a sha256sum binary or a generic shasum binary to run as "shasum
-a256 FILENAME".
Re
On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>
>
> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> [top posting]
>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
>> HOTFIX page, we need to have ju
On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> [top posting]
> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
> HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" instruction for ALL zips
> that simply says -- "Un
Am 08/10/2016 05:03 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for
On 08/10/2016 03:09 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
9. aug. 2016 kl. 13.23 skrev Carl Marcum :
...
Could we use a cross-platform installer like izpack [1]?
I started trying it out last weekend and it looks like it could do the job of
running a rename script and copying in the library.
I previously use
> 9. aug. 2016 kl. 13.23 skrev Carl Marcum :
> ...
> Could we use a cross-platform installer like izpack [1]?
>
> I started trying it out last weekend and it looks like it could do the job of
> running a rename script and copying in the library.
I previously used izPack for cross platform insta
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:26
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
> Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)
>
> Am 08/0
Am 08/09/2016 11:12 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
[top posting]
I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" instruction for ALL zips
that simply says -- "Unzip this
[top posting]
I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" instruction for ALL zips
that simply says -- "Unzip this package to some folder of your choosing
and r
On 8/9/2016 8:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
[orcmid]
I think requiring Java is a deal breaker, especially on Windows where
it is not installed by default. If we required Java for AOO, that
would be different, but we don't do that and we don't do anything to
automate the user having the r
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 04:23
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
> Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)
>
>
On 08/05/2016 12:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING].
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying
Am 08/06/2016 02:41 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 10:47
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 10:47
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
> Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)
>
> Am 08/0
Am 08/05/2016 07:02 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 09:36
To: OOo Apache; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1
Am 08/05/2016 06:28 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING].
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applyi
> -Original Message-
> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 09:36
> To: OOo Apache ; Dennis Hamilton
>
> Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
> Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)
>
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1
> [TESTING].
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> >
32 matches
Mail list logo
