John Howell wrote:
The two that are omitted are French violin clef (used a lot for flute
music, not violin music, in the Baroque), with G on the 1st line, and
sub-bass (used in Venetian vocal music of Gabrielli's time) with F on
the 5th line.
For purposes of transposition by clef, French violin
David W. Fenton wrote:
That description with the flip "octave transpositions are ad lib." at
the end seems to be rather clearly oriented towards score reading,
not towards performance, where the octave is clearly *not* ad lib.
So, I think the whole octave thing is pretty important. When read
(from Jari's reply to Christopher)
The questions was because it's the connection between the doc window
and the enigma document database that malfunctions before the
overwrite bug strikes. And I would assume that the first place to
look would be at places that in some way access the table (or ar
On Jan 23, 2005, at 12:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That should help...also,
Do you mind telling me how much RAM you have in your computer? You
can do this off list if you prefer. Thanks. I'm trying to get a
idea of what sorts of machines this is happening on...especially
memory specs.
I'm
At 12:11 AM +0100 1/26/05, Daniel Wolf wrote:
You only need to memorize the following clef sequence:
1. treble
2. alto
3. bass
4. mezzo-soprano
5. baritone
6. soprano
7. tenor
The two that are omitted are French violin clef (used a lot for flute
music, not violin music, in the Baroque), with G on
On 24 Jan 2005 at 22:45, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 24 Jan 2005, at 7:39 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
> Has Darcy reported low memory as a part of his problems?
That's hard to say. I had 768 MB of RAM in my old Mac, but I also
routinely run Mail and Safari and iKey and DragThing and RealPlayer
On 26 Jan 2005 at 0:11, Daniel Wolf wrote:
> You only need to memorize the following clef sequence:
>
> 1. treble
> 2. alto
> 3. bass
> 4. mezzo-soprano
> 5. baritone
> 6. soprano
> 7. tenor
>
> Each step up this sequence is equivalent to a transposition by one
> step on the staff, two steps up
On 24 Jan 2005 at 22:45, Darcy James Argue wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2005, at 7:39 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> > Has Darcy reported low memory as a part of his problems?
>
> That's hard to say. I had 768 MB of RAM in my old Mac, but I also
> routinely run Mail and Safari and iKey and DragThing and
dhbailey wrote:
Does anybody have a handy link to a list of the various transpositions
relative to the various clefs? I know there is a horn method by
Lorenzo Sansone which lists the transpositions utilizing clefs, but I
don't have a copy of that book.
You only need to memorize the following c
Daniel Wolf wrote:
John Howell wrote:
At 10:20 PM -0800 1/24/05, Chuck Israels wrote:
Of course, if you followed that logic all the way through, you'd
write the trombones in the tenor clef a lot of the time, and I don't
do that. And I still have to decipher the alto clef for the viola
parts (sh
Cool ... I have never noticed.
Dean
On Jan 25, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Perhaps it would not be beyond the pale (sp?) to give credit on a
score to the engraver, as well as composer, arr., etc. After all, it
is artistry, no?
T
On Jan 24, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
I would suggest adding (at least) another 256 MB of RAM to your
PowerBook. You will notice a considerable difference.
Enh, you know me. I have simple needs, and I'm not the sort of person
who craves speed. I don't perceive any problem with
On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:02 PM, Michael L. Meyer wrote:
Not that I ever got into the music OR education business for the
glory, but it sure would be nice if engraving credit were given with
regularity/consistency. I lucked out that the few professional
engraving jobs I've worked happened to have a w
Michael L. Meyer wrote:
After reading this, Andrew, I checked the back page and found
"Processed and printed by Halstan & Co. Ltd., Amersham, Bucks.,
England."
SCORE?
When was it published?
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@s
At 8:58 PM +0100 1/25/05, Daniel Wolf wrote:
John Howell wrote:
At 10:20 PM -0800 1/24/05, Chuck Israels wrote:
Of course, if you followed that logic all the way through, you'd
write the trombones in the tenor clef a lot of the time, and I
don't do that. And I still have to decipher the alto cle
On 1/25/05 1:05 PM, "Andrew Stiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it would not be beyond the pale (sp?) to give credit on a
>> score to the engraver, as well as composer, arr., etc. After all, it
>> is artistry, no?
>>
>
> T
John Howell wrote:
At 10:20 PM -0800 1/24/05, Chuck Israels wrote:
Of course, if you followed that logic all the way through, you'd
write the trombones in the tenor clef a lot of the time, and I don't
do that. And I still have to decipher the alto clef for the viola
parts (shame on me for not g
At 10:20 PM -0800 1/24/05, Chuck Israels wrote:
Of course, if you followed that logic all the way through, you'd
write the trombones in the tenor clef a lot of the time, and I don't
do that. And I still have to decipher the alto clef for the viola
parts (shame on me for not getting used to that
On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Perhaps it would not be beyond the pale (sp?) to give credit on a
score to the engraver, as well as composer, arr., etc. After all, it
is artistry, no?
There is actually a long historical tradition of doing just that. In a
great many pre-co
Perhaps it would not be beyond the pale (sp?) to give credit on a score
to the engraver, as well as composer, arr., etc. After all, it is
artistry, no?
Dean
On Jan 25, 2005, at 7:12 AM, Michael L. Meyer wrote:
Hey y’all --
Sorry for the OT post, but I figured it was a happy one so no one
would
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Jan 23, 2005, at 4:54 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Here are some more thoughts:
* Have you closed any documents prior to when the bug occurs?
Always.
* Have you had multiple windows for the same document opened?
Not me, in this case.
* Has any plug-ins been run that suppo
Title: [OT] Curious ... who did it?
Hey y’all --
Sorry for the OT post, but I figured it was a happy one so no one would mind. I was at rehearsal last night, and got curious. Did anybody on this list engrave the Vaughan Williams’ Dona Nobis Pacem choral score for Oxford University Press? I’m
Don Hart wrote:
Thanks, Chuck, but neither octave up or octave down (+7 or -7) is doing
anything to affect playback right now. Maybe it's my file. I'll experiment
and let you know if I can fix it.
Make certain the Transposition checkbox is checked (it should be once
you define the transposition)
Don Hart wrote:
on 1/24/05 2:45 PM, A-NO-NE Music at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don Hart / 05.1.24 / 03:31 PM wrote:
But when I score the pitches as they will be written in the part, the notes
I hear back are an octave too high.
It's a transposed instrument. Have you set it that way?
I realize i
On 25 Jan 2005, at 3:32 AM, Don Hart wrote:
We're shooting for the same thing in the bass part, but the rub comes
when I
view the score in concert pitch. That (as far as I know) is a command
that
affects an entire file. So if I want to see my transposed Bflat
clarinet in
concert (down one step
on 1/25/05 12:20 AM, Chuck Israels at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't think I understand what the problem is with writing your bass parts.
> If the correct transposition is set up in your template, then you simply write
> the part just as you would normally write it - as if you were doing it by
26 matches
Mail list logo