Yes Thomas,
Thomas Funk worked at this. I did some minor stuff, when I had time.
But I'm off to the sea for a week... will send you Thomas' effort tough.
Cheers,
Christine
On 01/21/2012 10:02 PM, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
This
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 02:36:38AM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
> I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important.
> I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal
> as it is, and instead of changing the default config, better invest
> some time into
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:07:07PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
> Thomas Adam writes:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
> >> wish to make the UI decisions myself, although
Michael Großer writes:
> Thomas Adam wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
> I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important.
> I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal
> as it is, and instead
<<
I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important.
I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal
as it is, and instead of changing the default config, better invest
some time into an idea of offering some example configurations for
new FVWM user
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
>> wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
>> on the FVWM-specific aspects of a proposed
Thomas Adam writes:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
>> wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
>> on the FVWM-specific aspects of a propos
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
> wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
> on the FVWM-specific aspects of a proposed config to make sure it's d
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:51:07AM +0400, Roman wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 02:46 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:- pixmap window
> decorations looking rather minimalist but fresh
> >This is tenuous, because there's absolutely *no* requirement that FVWM is
> >compiled against XPM support, or PNG, or SVG support.
On 04/27/2011 02:46 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:- pixmap window decorations
looking rather minimalist but fresh
This is tenuous, because there's absolutely *no* requirement that FVWM is
compiled against XPM support, or PNG, or SVG support. So, stick to vector
buttons, please. I do not want to make an
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:24:53AM +0400, Roman wrote:
> To my mind what a default config should be like depends mostly on what the
> developers would like to achieve. Would you like the userbase to be
> small and
> somewhat elitist, or would you like to make fvwm more popular and tolerate
> (cluel
First of all, sorry if I got some mailing list things wrong. Being aware
of fvwm
IRC FAQ I would still mention I'm pretty much noob and Nth generation Linux
and fvwm user, so what I say might seem strange.
To my mind what a default config should be like depends mostly on what the
developers woul
>On Mon, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:27:06 AM, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
>
>I personally don't care what modules are in there by default; the thing
>that desperately needs changing is the aesthetics. At the absolute
>minimum, the colour scheme needs to be changed. The existing default
>one is horrible.
>
The
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 08:14, Julien Guertault wrote:
> Apr 19, 2011 at 14:27, Kathryn Andersen :
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:02:52PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>>>
>>> [we need a new default config]
>>
>> [at very least the colour scheme]
>
> [ it would benefit to FVWM if it looked and
> felt g
On 19 April 2011 07:14, Julien Guertault wrote:
> Does this have to be some underground task with someone motivated
> enough to get it done, or is there any way it gets a more collaborative
> direction? I am thinking of the way a Wiki page may start from a rough
> draft and slowly improve as peopl
Apr 19, 2011 at 14:27, Kathryn Andersen :
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:02:52PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>>
>> [we need a new default config]
>
> [at very least the colour scheme]
>
> One program I've found helpful in devising colour schemes is Agave.
> http://home.gna.org/colorscheme/
>
> Another
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:02:52PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> Heh -- I am not suggesting that! It would be fairly static once in place --
> it's a *window manager* after all. Things like:
>
> * New FvwmButtons -- swallowing things like:
> - FvwmIconMan
> - FvwmScript (maybe a clo
Thomas Adam writes:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, des...@verizon.net wrote:
>> Thomas Adam writes:
>>
>> > All I am really looking to see what the interest involved in this is. I
>> > warn you though, I won't hesitate to put a stop to it if this turns into a
>> > shed
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, des...@verizon.net wrote:
> Thomas Adam writes:
>
> > All I am really looking to see what the interest involved in this is. I
> > warn you though, I won't hesitate to put a stop to it if this turns into a
> > shed-painting exercise -- I don't wa
Thomas Adam writes:
> All I am really looking to see what the interest involved in this is. I
> warn you though, I won't hesitate to put a stop to it if this turns into a
> shed-painting exercise -- I don't want that. I can already foresee a bunch
> of shed-painting, and I won't tolerate it.
S
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:53:58AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> No don't do it! Pretty soon you'll be caught up in the whole
> newer is better philosophy that KDE and GNOME are trapped in
> and no one on the planet will have any idea how to use fvwm
> because it keeps moving everything around and ch
No don't do it! Pretty soon you'll be caught up in the whole
newer is better philosophy that KDE and GNOME are trapped in
and no one on the planet will have any idea how to use fvwm
because it keeps moving everything around and changing
in every release.
I'd suggest my default config, but you obvi
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
on the FVWM-specific aspects of a proposed config to make sure it's done
"right".
What do I mean when I say "right"? Well, for far too lon
23 matches
Mail list logo
