RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Ati or Nvida

2008-06-18 Thread Bob Young
, your clients are not well served by your uninformed bias. -- Regards, Bob Young -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano

2008-05-17 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Francesco Talamona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:46 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano On Saturday 17 May 2008, Bob Young wrote: Can anybody explain what's

RE: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano

2008-05-17 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Ian Hilt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:03 PM To: Gentoo-user List Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano On Fri, 16 May 2008 at 7:07pm -0700, Bob Young wrote: I'm installing a new Gentoo box

RE: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano

2008-05-17 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Alex Schuster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:20 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano Bob Young writes: Currently I'm emerging xorg, but after that finishes

[gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano

2008-05-16 Thread Bob Young
Can anybody explain what's going on here, and tell me how I can fix it? BTW, if I edit with vi.everything works fine, and of course typing at the console works okay as well. Thanks for listening, Bob Young

[gentoo-user] Wireshark won't run except as root

2008-05-01 Thread Bob Young
] Thu May 01 /usr/bin $ : ./dumpcap bash: ./dumpcap: Permission denied [ 09:33:10 ] Thu May 01 /usr/bin $ : I'm sure it's probably something simple that I'm unaware of or not seeing for some reason. Can anybody point out what I'm doing wrong. Thanks, Bob Young San Jose, CA. -- gentoo-user

RE: [gentoo-user] Wireshark won't run except as root (Solved but Why is this)

2008-05-01 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Bob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 10:03 AM To: Gentoo-user List Subject: [gentoo-user] Wireshark won't run except as root I've emerged wireshark, and made myself a member of both the wireshark group, and the tcpdump group

RE: [gentoo-user] How Bad Is This...?

2008-04-23 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:22 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Bob Young Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How Bad Is This...? On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Bob Young wrote: I'm in the process of installing

[gentoo-user] How Bad Is This...?

2008-04-16 Thread Bob Young
, is another clean install, with a *second* brand new drive the best alternative, or is some even lower level hardware (i.e. disk controller) the more likely culprit at this point? Thanks for listening Bob Young San Jose, CA. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds

2008-03-02 Thread Bob Young
and, if it is one of those, how do I determine which one, and then how do I fix this...? Thanks for listening, Bob Young San Jose, CA -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds

2008-03-02 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 12:18 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds Bob Young wrote: How do I determine if this is a case of orphaned

[gentoo-user] mDNSResponder fails to compile

2008-01-15 Thread Bob Young
soon I guess the preferred method is to remove whatever USE flag(s) are bringing it in if that's possible, but I don't know how to determine that information and would be grateful for some assistance. Thanks, Bob Young San Jose CA. Responder daemon done i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -I. -I

RE: [gentoo-user] dhcpcd is too noisy in syslog

2007-04-22 Thread Bob Young
server's lease duration is badly misconfigured, or dhcpcd is not interpreting the data it receives from the dhcp server correctly wrt lease duration. Regards, Bob Young -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] .bashrc/.bash_profile not sourced upon login fo NIS authenticated users

2007-03-28 Thread Bob Young
, and if I'm just doing something stupid, let me know. TIA Bob Young San Jose, CA -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] A DNS question.

2007-03-03 Thread Bob Young
the windows domain is named mydomain.lan, can I have 69.12.134.79 (NIC #2) resolve to ns.debug1.com as that is it's publicly registered name, while IP address 10.10.32.1 (NIC #1) resolves to gentoo.mydomain.lan? TIA Bob Young San Jose, CA. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] A DNS question.

2007-03-03 Thread Bob Young
further comments/suggestions welcome. Thanks, Bob Young San Jose, CA -Original Message- From: Michal 'vorner' Vaner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 2:17 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A DNS question. On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 03:21:52PM

[gentoo-user] doc USE flag causes circular dependencies error

2007-02-25 Thread Bob Young
than disabling the doc USE flag? TIA Bob Young San Jose, CA -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] Why you use Gentoo

2006-09-08 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Colleen Beamer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 4:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why you use Gentoo Chris White wrote: So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something

RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-16 Thread Bob Young
Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:29 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1 Thursday 08 June 2006 16:00 skrev Bob Young: Show me some documentation for this staging you refer to. If you unpack the gcc sources you

RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-12 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Jerry McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 7:10 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1 On Wednesday 07 June 2006 21:50, Bob Young wrote: Note that the article does in the end, do a double

[gentoo-user] Evolution icons missing under KDE but nut under Gnome

2006-06-10 Thread Bob Young
This is how Evolution displays if I log in under KDE or Gnome: http://www.debug1.com/ Why the difference, and how can I get it to display correctly under KDE? TIA Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-08 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Fish Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 9:24 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1 On 6/7/06, Bob Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: chain. At the end of the first

RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-08 Thread Bob Young
? Doesn't make sense. Regards, Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-08 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:29 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1 Thursday 08 June 2006 16:00 skrev Bob Young: Show me some documentation for this staging you refer

[gentoo-user] Aparrent confcache issue - Solved,but.....

2006-06-03 Thread Bob Young
fresh database, or if there are just some ebuilds that break when it's enabled. 3. Is there any info regarding refreshing, updating, maintaining, confcache's cache, specifically how, when, and what to do? TIA Bob Young San Jose, CA. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Build error in threads.c, maybe related to nptlonly use flag.

2006-05-12 Thread Bob Young
, Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] Build error in threads.c, maybe related to nptlonly use flag.

2006-05-12 Thread Bob Young
like a bug in the configure to me. The configure is finding that glibc has the pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np function, so in threads.c it is activating this piece of code: Thanks for the detailed explaination and the solution, much appreciated. Regards, Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org

RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-15 Thread Bob Young
to adopt the few simple practices that would keep them safe, AntiVirus software may have some value. However, for anyone willing to adhere to a few basic rules, AV software is mostly the modern day equevelent of Snake Oil, it's a waste of money and CPU cycles. Regards Bob Young -Original Message

RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-10 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Michael Kintzios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:12 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus -Original Message- From: Bob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 March 2006 21:05

RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-09 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Jarry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:50 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus Bob Young wrote: PowerUser is different from Admin, Admin is the equevelent of root in the Linux/Unix world

RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-08 Thread Bob Young
on their system and stop doing it. In the vast majority of Windows cases, simply *not* routinely logging on with admin privileges would probably stop 99% plus of the infections. Regards, Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-08 Thread Bob Young
all apps including email and browsers running with Admin rights. Regards, Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-08 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Jarry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 1:04 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus Bob Young wrote: In the vast majority of Windows cases, simply *not* routinely logging on with admin privileges would

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: default stage3

2005-11-21 Thread Bob Young
sombody explain why it's necessary/desirable to do this *twice*? What real difference does the second execution really make? Thanks, Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] Kernel 2.6.14 Nvidia

2005-11-07 Thread Bob Young
user who experienced problems. http://www.usenetlinux.com/archive/topic.php/t-495527.html The bug on it posted b.g.o: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104369 May not be your problem, but maybe worth investigating. -- Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] Kernel 2.6.14 Nvidia

2005-11-07 Thread Bob Young
, use the vesafb, then your nvidia driver should load. Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] failed to load nvidia kernel module

2005-10-27 Thread Bob Young
value for your arch. HTH, Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] failed to load nvidia kernel module

2005-10-27 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Qian Qiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:53 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] failed to load nvidia kernel module On 10/27/05, Bob Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm ran into the exact same problem

RE: [gentoo-user] failed to load nvidia kernel module

2005-10-27 Thread Bob Young
-Original Message- From: Qian Qiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 1:07 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] failed to load nvidia kernel module On 10/27/05, Bob Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Now that you mention it, I did

RE: [gentoo-user] failed to load nvidia kernel module

2005-10-27 Thread Bob Young
! *** I thought that was what I remembered. Althoughif it's the 2.6.13 gentoo kernel that's responsible for creating the necessary nodes, why do the unstable/masked versions of nvidia-kernel work correctly under a 2.6.13 kernel without any helper scripts? Regards, Bob Young

RE: [gentoo-user] failed to load nvidia kernel module

2005-10-27 Thread Bob Young
-r4 runs fine. Seems it is: Thread from another user who experienced the problem: http://www.usenetlinux.com/archive/topic.php/t-495527.html The bug on it posted in Gentoo bugzilla: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104369 Regards, Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] possible defective memory

2005-10-11 Thread Bob Young
it, or if they were both needed. May not help you, but thought I'd mention it just in case. Regards, Bob Young -Original Message- From: bruce harding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:13 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] possible

RE: [gentoo-user] portage bugs?

2005-10-06 Thread Bob Young
to be just the compiler that was hung, as a ctrl-c would return me to the command prompt. Forcing nosmp and noapic on the boot command line of the install CD resolved that hang. Unfortunately that was after trying a *lot* of other things and command line options. Regards, Bob Young -Original

[gentoo-user] Named problem, I'm beyond my depth and need a little help here

2005-09-27 Thread Bob Young
if there is something I've left out that would be relevant or helpful. Thanks for any Help Bob Young -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list