>> OS/360 was a real storage only operating system. DAT was introduced
with
>> S/370. OS/390 could run on that hardware but not use DAT (and other
>> new hardware facilites).
>
>DAT was introduced on 360/67 ... basically 360/65 with dynamic address
>translation ... at least in its single processor
The post I remembered is:-
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0108&L=ibm-main&P=R50688&I=1&X=-
Regards
Bruce Hewson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the mes
At 0:55 -0400 on 10/05/2007, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote about Re:
Check out E-Mail Problem Creates Message Flood - AOL Ne:
At 23:02 -0400 on 10/04/2007, Ed Finnell wrote about Check out
E-Mail Problem Creates Message Flood - AOL News:
_E-Mail Problem Creates Message Flood - AOL News_
(http:/
At 15:45 -0400 on 10/05/2007, Ed Finnell wrote about Re: Check out
E-Mail Problem Creates Message Flood - AOL Ne:
Wasn't the original Christmas Worm on VM an OoO attempt?
If I remember correctly it was. User 1 had scheduled a message (I
think it was a large message he wanted to get sent/deli
Of course this annual discussion of daylight savings, and now time zones,
has always been one of my favourite gripes.
Working as I am in Asia, for a multi-national company, being involved in any
global conference call is always tricky. I keep suggesting that we should
all just book such calls usin
Hello Varun,
ISPF 3.4 will search every available catalog to build the dataset list.
I do recall seeing either on this list or the ISPF-L list posts describing
an ISPF built-in function that will allow you to determine which catalogs
are used to build the dataset list.
Regards
Bruce Hewson
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 22:47:21 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>> China has one time zone.
>
>So does India.
>
And Chile has two.
And Russia has 11.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:02 PM, McKown, John wrote:
John,
When I tried this (a few years ago) it seemed to work. I am working
from memory but you can figure out the correct syntax without too
much effort.
compress dsorg=po etc...
Don't specify dsn's.
Ed
George Soley wrote:
We've been testing a hipersockets connection between z/OS V1R7 and linux
partitions. After following the setup steps in the Hipersockets Red Book
transmit speeds using ftp or scp have been disappointing. Either our
testing process is incorrect or the configuration is wrong.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This has always intrigued me. What was done to eliminate the
> possibility that the channel had to access a virtual page that had
> been
> China has one time zone.
So does India.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the arch
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:13:22 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>Why would a MUA ever be designed to allow sending an OoO
>message via Reply All? ...
"Designed"? You're making a rash assumption.
Pat O'Keefe
--
In a message dated 10/5/2007 4:43:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>initially running on 360/67
machines. it had hack on the side to create a single 16mbyte virtual
address space and some simple interrupt handler for page faults. it
also had CCWTRANS (and associated
back in the old days we'd simply hmig and hrecall the whole lot. can't say
if that still works or not.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Havelock, Glenn A
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subje
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:35 -0600, Howard Brazee wrote:
> China has one time zone.
Which (of course) is set for the convenience of Beijing. Pity the poor
souls in (far) western regions.
The difference is noticeable just trying to arrange photos at dawn each
day as you putter up (what is known as)
>The weights only take effect when the machine is at 100%.
Not quite accurate.
All LPARs also have to 'want' CPU.
If one is coasting and the other wants more, it will get it (unless capped).
EG:
Weights: LPARA -- 650
LPARB -- 350
Off shift LPARA is nearly idle
Processor usage 100%
>F
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:36:32 -0600, Howard Brazee wrote:
>On 5 Oct 2007 09:27:19 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>
>>Or c) set all clocks worldwide to GMT (UTC) and just learn what time of
>>day things (like sunrise, sunset, lunchtime, bedtime, "happy hour",
>>etc.) happen in "your" loca
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:16:06 -0500, Matthew Stitt wrote:
>Several years a company I worked at saw their e-mail system get hit with a
>similar (non-)attack. An executive went on vacation and set the
>"out-of-office" reply to respond to "reply-all". Couple that with a few
>more people out of the of
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hunkeler Peter , KIUK 3) writes:
> OS/360 was a real storage only operating system. DAT was introduced with
> S/370. OS/390 could run on that har
If you have CA'S PDSMAN its FASTCOPY utility will handle this.
Regards,
Glenn
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 10:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mass PDS C
In a message dated 10/5/2007 2:16:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Several years a company I worked at saw their e-mail system get hit with a
similar (non-)attack. An executive went on vacation and set the
"out-of-office" reply to respond to "reply-all". Couple tha
As it's from CBT, I suggest you either contact the author (Glenn Siegel) or
see if someone else knows this utility. It may have the capability now of
"GET"ing the next part of the message when the first IEC534D is seen.
After a quick peek at the code, I noticed that Glen has made other updates
What is the MTU size set to on your system(s)?
With HiperSockets you can go to large MTU and not be stuck with the old size
of 1492. I believe 64K is not too unreasonable.
>We've been testing a hipersockets connection between z/OS V1R7 and linux
>partitions. After following the setup steps in
Several years a company I worked at saw their e-mail system get hit with a
similar (non-)attack. An executive went on vacation and set the
"out-of-office" reply to respond to "reply-all". Couple that with a few
more people out of the office, and it did not take long to bring the
company's network
Well, IBM has a STORGRP parameter for DSS copy. Too bad they don't have
one for COMPRESS.
Terry Traylor
charlesSCHWAB
TIS Mainframe Storage Management
Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg
(602) 977-5154
WARNING: All email sent to or from this address will be received by the
Charles Schwab corporate e
It is the MPFXTALL from CBT. Where do I have to specify the parameter
list and how is it coded?
kind regards
Franz Josef Pohlen
Dan D schrieb:
Where is MPFXTALL from ... CBT or homegrown?
This exit needs to be updated to allow you to indicate that you want
to act
upon the WTOR version of th
On 5 Oct 2007 11:39:50 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kelman, Tom)
wrote:
>Just try Indiana. At least Arizona can agree on how to set their clocks
>state wide. Indiana can't even do that. Some of the state goes to
>Daylight Saving Time and some doesn't.
I thought I read that Indiana finally gave in
But Ed, think of the possibilities! Write it, add it to Phoenix' stable of
excellent products, sell it for a pittance so many companies could afford
it... :-D
Later,
Ray
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
http://www.catherdersoftware.com/
http://www.mrmullins.big-bear-city.ca.us/
http://w
McKown, John wrote:
Off hand, without having coded it, I'd say that I'd try to use REXX. I'd
OUTTRAP the contents of a LISTC. For each NONVSAM entry, I'd do a
LISTDSI to check. If the RC=0 and the DSORG=PO, then I'd ALLOCATE it and
then call IEBCOPY to do the actual compress. I think that ADRDSSU
>
> >> Just say Eastern Time, or Pacific, or Mountain...
> >> It's just as accurate and you don't have to worry about confusing
> people.
> >
> >Wanna bet ???.
> >
> >Shane ...
>
> Especially if you are in Arizona in the summer, one of the few places
> that doesn't believe we "save" time by chang
Nope. Just use a different name (it must start with IXC). Obviously
you have to add it to pathin/pathout in COUPLExx to be available at
IPL time, but you can add it dynamically while your LPAR(s) are still
up to verify it is working.
PATHIN STRNAME(IXCSTR1,IXCSTR2)
PATHOUT STRNAME(IXCSTR1,IXC
> > Ed:
> >
> > Admittedly my experience with Kommand is dated also. It's about 6
> > years
> > old. However, when I worked for a company that used it, the
> > product had
> > an SVC with it. This SVC trapped every request that would cause a
> > change in a dataset's size such as new allocation,
>ASM, RSM and VSM all work together to resolve these kinds of issues;
>it's called "Teamwork". If you've validly GETMAINed the storage, you'll
>never know where the storage resided when you started the access; if
you
>don't validly own the storage, you'll see the mainframe equivalent of
>Micros
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 12:44 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Mass PDS Compress Without Volume Specification
>
>
> I've recently put together a service updat
Maybe you coud write an ADRDSSU UIM to do that? should be relatively
simple to do - provide storage group and a pattern in DD:UIMIN,
build a sysin and attach adrdssu.
Alex
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access inst
I've recently put together a service update procedure that starts by
invoking DSS to compress all PDS-type libraries whose data set names
match a given pattern. These are SMS-managed data sets and will reside
on any of the volumes in the storage group.
I tried this and got the error shown:
|1
I always thought the purpose of daylight savings was to force drive-in
theaters out of business!!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN I
If you download the iso file from Ken's site you can use a demo from
dvdSanta to burn it in DVD format.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM
On 5 Oct 2007 09:46:49 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom
Marchant) wrote:
>My preference is B, though I don't see why we should make a half hour
>adjustment. I don't really care that much what time it is. I just wish the
>government would quit mucking with my clocks.
I wonder what they do with al
On 5 Oct 2007 09:27:19 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Or c) set all clocks worldwide to GMT (UTC) and just learn what time of
>day things (like sunrise, sunset, lunchtime, bedtime, "happy hour",
>etc.) happen in "your" locality.
World sports (ESPN time) may lead towards some public a
On 5 Oct 2007 08:41:37 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Jaffe)
wrote:
>IMHO, we should either a) make all time-telling devices adjust
>themselves automatically -- with some way to keep up with the local
>policy changes that will inevitably occur from time-to-time -- like
>mainframes do when syn
Thanks Mark for the info. I have not tried an additional structure, we only
have one now. Is there any trick to setting up a second?
Thanks,
Chris Burgess
EMC²
where information lives
Phone: 1-800-445-2588 x42149
1-508-249-2149
Pager: 1-877-443-8447
Fax: 1-508-54
I've gotten some good things to go by. I'll run them by the guy who is doing
the work. He knows the values for the TVC and so on and might even know
the microcode level from IBM.
Thanks for the suggestions to this point and I'll post what happens here.
--
On 5 Oct 2007 06:19:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
>I don't remember anybody asking about this before. I just got a new Mac
>Mini and put it on my LAN at home. I use x3270 on Linux, but don't like
>it very much compared to Hummingbird on Windows. I know that I can use
>x3270 on
Where is MPFXTALL from ... CBT or homegrown?
This exit needs to be updated to allow you to indicate that you want to act
upon the WTOR version of the IEC534D message. The MPF exit parameter list
has a flag to indicate that the message is a WTOR, so the update should be
fairly simple.
Dan D
fjp
Herbie,
I monitor IBM-MAIN via the web interface and I haven't seen
your post yet. Maybe it was rejected due to the images you
attached (deleted from my response). To answer your question...
The weights are normalized to 100%. So 33, is the same as
333 if using 1000 as the total instead of 100
Where is MPFXTALL from ... CBT or homegrown?
This exit needs to be updated to allow you to indicate that you want to act
upon the WTOR version of the IEC534D message. The MPF exit parameter list
has a flag to indicate that the message is a WTOR, so the update should be
fairly simple.
Dan D
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:17:03 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>
>Of course, Shane was referring to the fact that he lives in Australia.
>Eastern Time for them is not the same as Eastern Time in the United States.
And it's winter there when it's summer in the northern hemisphere.
>
>
>
>IMHO, we shoul
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:22:38 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>
>For those that need it, the PROC is extremely simple:
>
>//AXRPSTRT PROC
>//AXRPSTRT EXEC PGM=AXRINSTR,TIME=NOLIMIT
>// PEND
>
Is "PEND" tolerated in library PROCs nowadays? I have always considered
it a PITA and extraordinarily stu
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:41:04 -0500, Chris Burgess
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have trying to research the cause of IXC454I messages when we IPL and
>have come up empty. We have a test environment where we bring up one
>LPAR (to initialize the Sysplex) and when complete, we bring up 15 more in one
Field, Alan C. wrote:
I don't think the PROC AXRPSTRT is included in the web deliverable. I
Couldn't find it when I needed it. I downloaded UA35446 which is only
for 1.9 and extracted the PROC from it.
For those that need it, the PROC is extremely simple:
//AXRPSTRT PROC
//AXRPSTRT EXEC PGM
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:17:03 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>
>Of course, Shane was referring to the fact that he lives in Australia.
>Eastern Time for them is not the same as Eastern Time in the United States.
>
Worse yet, responding to the OP's plaint, in the Uniform Daylight Time
Act of 1966, the U.S
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
>
> [ snip ]
>
> Of course, Shane was referring to the fact that he lives in
> Australia.
> Eastern Time for them is not the same as Eastern Time in the
> United States.
>
> When I was a kid, we had o
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with SET IBM-MAIN NOMAIL as the
body.
You can find this out by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
GET IBM-MAIN INFO as the body, which is listed at the bottom of every
post.
> Original Message
> From: Philip Miscione <[EMAIL PROTECTED
CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=A580,PATH=((CSS(0),B0,B1,B2,B3)),*
UNITADD=((00,016)),CUADD=0,UNIT=3490
IODEVICE ADDRESS=(580,016),UNITADD=00,CUNUMBR=(A580),STADET=Y,*
UNIT=3490
CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=A590,PATH=((CSS(0),B0,B1,B
You should be able to get at least 32 virtuals online. We are currently
running a way back leveled B18 with LM 531.11B and VTS 2.23.38.05 w/FP11
and have 32 virtual drives on 2 logical controllers. Our TVC is 72 GB and
so our FC is less than what would be required to run 64 virtuals. I'm not
ce
How do I set the no mail option
Thanks,
-
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be
CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b)
is intended
o
Hello,
Yes, the SAXREXEC isn't installed into by the System REXX Web deliverable
FMID HBB77SR, however, we do reserve the right in the future to ship a PTF
to HBB77SR that *does* use this data set. (I'm aware that the current level
of the Web deliverable program directory says it used 16 tracks fo
John,
You might try focusing on JAVA based tn3270 emulators. There are a ton
of hits.
-Rob Schramm
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you
receive this e-mail in error, please do
Howard Brazee wrote:
Especially if you are in Arizona in the summer, one of the few places
that doesn't believe we "save" time by changing our clocks.
Of course, Shane was referring to the fact that he lives in Australia.
Eastern Time for them is not the same as Eastern Time in the United S
Another possibility is to use WLM defined capacity. Set the MSU's to
the equivalent of 200 MIPs (30-32 MSUs depending on the conversion
factor) and set the LPAR to WLM managed. It will be able to get more
than the specified limit but the 4 hour rolling average will not exceed
the limit.
-Or
Others have mentioned the web site for the Brown tn3270 emulator.
I use this program frequently on my Mac. It is OSX-native and it works
fine,
even with custom screen sizes, but it does have some rough edges and
bugs.
There are a few commercial offerings for the Mac as well, but I have not
tried
I have trying to research the cause of IXC454I messages when we IPL and
have come up empty. We have a test environment where we bring up one
LPAR (to initialize the Sysplex) and when complete, we bring up 15 more in one
shot. A few will come up completely and others get IXC454I messages. We are
On 4 Oct 2007 14:14:26 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shane) wrote:
>> Just say Eastern Time, or Pacific, or Mountain...
>> It's just as accurate and you don't have to worry about confusing people.
>
>Wanna bet ???.
>
>Shane ...
Especially if you are in Arizona in the summer, one of the few places
tha
I remember something about MacKermit having 3270 emulation
- Original Message -
From: "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 9:19 AM
Subject: 3270 emulator for Mac?
> I don't remember anybody asking about this before. I ju
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:19:32 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>I don't remember anybody asking about this before. I just got a new Mac
>Mini and put it on my LAN at home. I use x3270 on Linux, but don't like
>it very much compared to Hummingbird on Windows. I know that I can use
>x3270 on my new Mac, but
>But it can still be divided into two situations:
>1. No real frame, no auxiliary slot
>2. No real frame but has auxiliary slot assigned.
Right. If the request is valid, i.e. VSM says the storage
is allocated case 1.) means this is a first time reference.
Case 2.) means the real fram has been stol
Thanks to all for the pointer to Brown university. I went there and
downloaded the dmg file. It does really say whether this is a Aqua
(native) or X version, but I'll give it a try.
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Ser
On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:14 AM, Kelman, Tom wrote:
Ed:
Admittedly my experience with Kommand is dated also. It's about 6
years
old. However, when I worked for a company that used it, the
product had
an SVC with it. This SVC trapped every request that would cause a
change in a dataset's size
Hi listers,
I have a customer who has no tape management system. He preloads 6 tapes
on his 3590 loader. The first backup job runs normally and uses 2 tapes.
The third tape is for possible data growth. Now the second job starts,
but because there is currently the third tape mounted, which is w
>>While GETMAIN does not immediately associate real storage, FREEMAIN
>>does disassociate and free any associated real storage and all slots
>>on page data sets if any of the pages have been paged out.
>
>I guess only those complete pages will be released?
>Like what PGRLSE does.
My fault. This
We are doing some initial information gathering on IBM's Tivoli License
Compliance Manager for z/OS and was looking for any recommendations and/or
feedback from shops that might be using it currently. Is it doing what it
claims and how happy are you with it?
TIA,
Bill Johnson
Syste
John McKown of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 10/05/2007 08:19:32 AM:
> I don't remember anybody asking about this before. I just got a new Mac
> Mini and put it on my LAN at home. I use x3270 on Linux, but don't like
> it very much compared to Hummingbird on Windows. I know that I ca
John,
I found this link:
http://www.brown.edu/Facilities/CIS/tn3270/index.html
On 10/5/07, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't remember anybody asking about this before. I just got a new Mac
> Mini and put it on my LAN at home. I use x3270 on Linux, but don't like
> it very mu
On 05/10/2007, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't remember anybody asking about this before. I just got a new Mac
> Mini and put it on my LAN at home. I use x3270 on Linux, but don't like
> it very much compared to Hummingbird on Windows. I know that I can use
> x3270 on my new Mac
I know that course. I borrowed the hard copy textbook of it from one friend
last year.
Textbook is excellent but in my opinion, it's too slim compared to the
topics it wants to cover.
On 10/4/07, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >Does the 2 week internal course still exist?
On 10/4/07, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> PIC 11 means DAT finds an invalid pointer to a real frame associated
> with the virtual address being translated. This means, there is
> currently no real frame assigned.
But it can still be divided into two situations:
1. No real
The weights only take effect when the machine is at 100%. You should check
the CPU utilization of the machine and the lpar in RMF. If the machine is
at 100% and the lpar is at 100% than this most probably did help out.
Lizette said:
I am trying to understand how weights work with LPARs.
We hav
Does this Dataset have an Alias assigned to it? I used to work at a
shop that used a lot of Dataset Aliases and when we did a 3.4 List we
got two entries, One for the Alias and One for the Real Dataset. I don't
remember if there was an option to suppress listing two entries, but I
think there was.
George,
FTP is going to be limitted by the speed of your disk. SCP, unless you have
crypto hardware, is likely going to be limitted by CPU. I've FTP'd between
Linux virtual machines over a real hipersocket on single-IFL z9-109 at over
200 megabytes per second.
Just a note that FTP get is MUCH fas
Thanks Allan, That was it. The dataset was also catalogued in another
usercat.
Regards,
Varun
This is a PRIVATE message
What type of mainframe are you running?
Joel Wolpert
Director - Performance and Capacity Planning
Shared Data Center
Securities Industry Automation Corporation
2 Metrotech Center
New York, NY 11201
(212) 383-3323
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/5/07, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Storage management is done in 4KB units (aka pages). A segment is 1MB.
I got this from Carmine's book and it might be wrong.
>
> While GETMAIN does not immediately associate real storage, FREEMAIN
> does disassociate and fre
Dave Thorn wrote:
Correct. I was just using the environment presented and assuming all
LPARs were IPLed. But if the smaller LPAR is capped I don't think it
will exceed the cap, regardless of what else is going on.
Yes, the cap will be enforced as intended as long as both LPARs are
active. I
I don't remember anybody asking about this before. I just got a new Mac
Mini and put it on my LAN at home. I use x3270 on Linux, but don't like
it very much compared to Hummingbird on Windows. I know that I can use
x3270 on my new Mac, but I'm wondering if there are any Mac native
(Aqua) 3270 emula
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:40:37 -0400, Lizette Koehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>We have 1 z890 with 2 LPARS (prod and test)
>We set the weights to 65/35 for Prod vs. Test
>Our DBAs said to raise it to 75/25 so that PROD would get more steam. We
>only have 3 engines
>They said when we did that it
We've been testing a hipersockets connection between z/OS V1R7 and linux
partitions. After following the setup steps in the Hipersockets Red Book
transmit speeds using ftp or scp have been disappointing. Either our
testing process is incorrect or the configuration is wrong. Does anyone
have expe
> Posted by Ed Gould:
>
> My experience with Kommand is rather dated. But when I knew it it was
> nothing more than one or two smf exits and a few cobol programs which
> seem to blow up about weekly. At the time it had no DASD space
> accounting.
>
>
>
Ed:
Admittedly my experience with Kommand
Look for the dataset to be cataloged in 2 different user catalogs
This must be done by a LISTCAT for each individual usercatalog.
ISPF 3.4 cannot do this. It must be IDCAMS LISTCAT.
Try LISTCAT ENT('your.dataset.name') ALL CAT('your.usercatalog.here')
either online or in batch.
*ONCE FOR EACH U
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:27:27 -0700, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bohn, Dale wrote:
>> OA22774 has been opened to address the missing proc.
>>
>
>Bad IFREQs! Missing PROCs! (What's next?) Obviously, the System REXX
>install was never fully tested.
>
I wasn't going to say it... but now t
Correct. I was just using the environment presented and assuming all
LPARs were IPLed. But if the smaller LPAR is capped I don't think it
will exceed the cap, regardless of what else is going on.
Dave Thorn * Senior Technology Analyst * SunGard Computer Services * 600
Laurel Oak Road, Voorhees,
Dave Thorn wrote:
1. You need to cap the LPAR at the 200 MIP level. (on the panel I
believe it's a check box under "Initial Capping") If you have 2 LPARs
on a 1000 MIP machine, for example, and all CPs are shared, you could
weight the capped LPAR at 20 and the other at 80. (20/100=.2,
.2*100
Changing the weight from 65 to 75 (in your particular environment)
increased the available MIPS to the PROD LPAR by 15%: (75-65)/65=15.3%
Another simple example: if you have 1000 MIPS, your Prod LPAR went from
650 to 750 MIPS, which is not an insignificant change. Conversely, the
test LPAR went
I am trying to understand how weights work with LPARs.
We have 1 z890 with 2 LPARS (prod and test)
We set the weights to 65/35 for Prod vs. Test
Our DBAs said to raise it to 75/25 so that PROD would get more steam. We
only have 3 engines
They said when we did that it got better.
1. You need to cap the LPAR at the 200 MIP level. (on the panel I
believe it's a check box under "Initial Capping") If you have 2 LPARs
on a 1000 MIP machine, for example, and all CPs are shared, you could
weight the capped LPAR at 20 and the other at 80. (20/100=.2,
.2*1000=200)
2. Yes, it
We have the VTS in place and the latest microcodes on it but seem to be
having a controller problem. We can only get one controller online, and none
after that. We'd like to have 64 drives in it, but can't get beyond 16. We are
designating the units as 3490 which limiits us to 16 per controller.
Hi,
I am using shared processor across LPARS. I need to restrict my one LPAR to
200 MIPS only so that it can not consume more than 200 mips. I am also using
Coupling Facility.
How can I achieve that ? What Initial Weight I need to assign in the Change
Logical LPAR controls panel ?
Can I change i
Shane
That'll be because, where you come from, Eastern Time, or Pacific, or
Mountain would all be the same, I expect!
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: "Shane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: IBML
Greetings,
One of the user's have reported me an issue regarding duplicate entries
for a particular dataset on the same volume. While I can try and fix the
issue (by un-cataloguing/cataloguing the dataset), I cant really
understand how the two entries would be displayed in the first place.
The
>>After a successful GETMAIN request, I will get a virtual storage area
to
>Is that area supported by either real storage or auxiliary storage as
>soon as the GETMAIN completes?
This is where PIC 10/11 enter the scene: You got your virtual storage
but
it is not yet associated with any real storag
100 matches
Mail list logo
