Unfortunately, there is not much you can do besides increase the L parameter
and the number of iterations.
Increasing the diameter of a simulation relative to the wavelength increases
the condition number, which worsens the convergence of iterative solvers. The
general way to improve this is t
Hello to the meep community,
I was hoping to use the frequency domain solver for my own application,
but I've encountered a stumbling block.
I've played around with the ring resonator tutorial example, and it
seems that when I increase the domain size (let's say a radius of 10
micrometers) or
Hi Saket,
This is an error message sent by Guile because (meep-fields-solve-cw
fields tol maxiters L) is not called properly.
For example, this message appears if maxiters has type double instead of
integer.
See
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Meep_Reference#Frequency-domain_s
Dear meep users,
I am using frequency domain solver to computes field produced in
structure but it is showing an error " No matching method for generic
function meep_fields_solve_cw".What could be the problem ?
Thank you!
___
meep-discuss mail
t: Thursday, 19 March 2015 12:16 p.m.
> To: Gib Bogle
> Cc: meep-discuss
> Subject: Re: [Meep-discuss] Frequency-domain solver
>
> Exactly, this is the trunk repository with the most fresh code.
> F. D.
>
> 2015-03-19 0:11 GMT+01:00, Gib Bogle :
>> I don't think you we
, 19 March 2015 12:16 p.m.
To: Gib Bogle
Cc: meep-discuss
Subject: Re: [Meep-discuss] Frequency-domain solver
Exactly, this is the trunk repository with the most fresh code.
F. D.
2015-03-19 0:11 GMT+01:00, Gib Bogle :
> I don't think you were confused, but I'm wondering where I s
evengj/meep
>
> Gib
>
> From: Filip Dominec [filip.domi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 19 March 2015 12:05 p.m.
> To: Gib Bogle
> Cc: meep-discuss
> Subject: Re: [Meep-discuss] Frequency-domain solver
>
> Hi, Gib, perhaps I was a bit confused. The fact is
b Bogle
Cc: meep-discuss
Subject: Re: [Meep-discuss] Frequency-domain solver
Hi, Gib, perhaps I was a bit confused. The fact is that MEEP source
has been fixed by the commit I mentioned, and it was not before April
2014. Therefore if the release 1.2.1 comes from March, it is probably
not fixed (no
t: Thursday, 19 March 2015 11:26 a.m.
> To: Gib Bogle
> Cc: meep-discuss
> Subject: Re: [Meep-discuss] Frequency-domain solver
>
> Hi, Gib, it looks exactly like the bug that has been resolved in git
> commit
> https://github.com/stevengj/meep/commit/0640e9f6a2ccfa2a40375a89b569
From: Filip Dominec [filip.domi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 19 March 2015 11:26 a.m.
To: Gib Bogle
Cc: meep-discuss
Subject: Re: [Meep-discuss] Frequency-domain solver
Hi, Gib, it looks exactly like the bug that has been resolved in git
commit
https
Hi, Gib, it looks exactly like the bug that has been resolved in git
commit
https://github.com/stevengj/meep/commit/0640e9f6a2ccfa2a40375a89b5692ebb1fb87efb
Could you check a recent version of MEEP either compiling it from
source (blue box in http://f.dominec.eu/meep/index.html#install), or
insta
I am trying to use the frequency-domain solver for a 3D problem, 25x25x22 with
resolution=10. The output from
(meep-fields-solve-cw fields)
is:
Meep: using complex fields.
on time step 1 (time=0.05), 41.9989 s/step
final residual = 0
Finished solve_cw after 1 steps and 0 CG iters.
It seems that
Hello Ali,
you can use the solve_cw() function.
However you may have to fall back the norm2() in the CG-algorithm
of meep 1.2 to the old one, which was from meep 1.1 or earlier.
Regards
Chuanren
2013/4/22 Ali Naqavi
>
> Dear MEEP users/developers
>
> Is it possible to use MEEP's frequency-dom
Dear MEEP users/developers
Is it possible to use MEEP's frequency-domain solver in the c++ interface?
If yes, what are the corresponding commands?
Thanks for your answer in advance,
Ali
___
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
http:/
There seems to be a bug in bicgstab.cpp in meep-1.2.
Without the following patch physical.cpp test gives nan ratio, although
make check passed.
Best regards
Munehiro
--- bicgstab.cpp.orig 2012-12-18 22:52:19.159110261 +0900
+++ bicgstab.cpp2012-12-18 22:53:44.655994596 +0900
@@ -84,7 +8
Hi everybody,
I was wondering if anybody managed to get some experience with the frequency
domain solver in MEEP.
I succeeded in getting my simulations up and running, but so far they all ended
in "CONVERGENCE FAILLURE".
I don't know if there's any relevance to my problem, but if I output my fi
On Feb 7, 2008, at 7:53 PM, Jonathan Breeze wrote:
> I have heard that an undocumented frequency domain solver exists
> within
> MEEP. Is this true? I would be keen to find out, since I have some
> problems which would be ideal for an eigensolver approach in 2D
> cylindrical coordinates (dielect
I have heard that an undocumented frequency domain solver exists within
MEEP. Is this true? I would be keen to find out, since I have some
problems which would be ideal for an eigensolver approach in 2D
cylindrical coordinates (dielectric resonators).
--
Jonathan Breeze
Research Fellow
Departmen
18 matches
Mail list logo