On 2015/09/23 08:16, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:37:05AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2015-09-22, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > > I just updated my current box to yesterdays (2015-09-21) snapshot. Now
> > > it won't keep a network address.
North American? ...
On 22/09/15 12:45 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Christian Weisgerber
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:29:03 + (UTC)
On 2015-09-21, Stefan Sperling wrote:
The function that parses funny numbers is iswdigit() which gets a wchar_t.
But
> Those instructions are for 5.8 or possible 5.7, they aren't needed for
> -current snapshots which already include this change.
>
Of course, I read the files.
--
Thuban
PubKey : http://yeuxdelibad.net/Divers/thuban.pub
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which
Hi misc@ advocacy@
As mentioned on the OpenBSD Mailing Lists page [1] in the Other Lists
section, the fine folks at squish.net [2] run daily and weekly source
changes and ports changes summary lists:
[1] http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html#OtherLists
[2]
On 2015-09-23, Thuban wrote:
> * Stefan Sperling le [22-09-2015 11:33:28 +0200]:
>>
>> Starting with pristine OpenBSD 5.8 kernel source (or 5.7, if you want to
>> try your luck), add the line
[..snip..]
> Thank you for this very complete explanations.
>
>
Hello,
I'm not sure to understand correctly somme points :
1. A snapshot is a build made at one time of the developpement, more
recent than *-stable* flavor.
It is not *-current*. Can we consider a snapshot as an unreleased *5.8*
at this time. Or is it above *5.8*?
2. In odrer to build the system,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:55:21PM +0200, Thuban wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm not sure to understand correctly somme points :
> 1. A snapshot is a build made at one time of the developpement, more
> recent than *-stable* flavor.
> It is not *-current*. Can we consider a snapshot as an unreleased *5.8*
>
On 23 September 2015 at 15:34, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em 23-09-2015 04:40, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
>> Saves messing about with DHCPv6-PD
>
> I see. So you translate from what exactly? Wouldn't it be better to use
> af-to instead of nat?
Hello,
Rather than
Em 23-09-2015 04:40, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> Saves messing about with DHCPv6-PD
I see. So you translate from what exactly? Wouldn't it be better to use
af-to instead of nat? But I can relate to that, given that my CPE will
give me a PD, but won't route packets back because it thinks the
The Windows DISKPART command-line utility (Windows Vista and later) can
split your USB disk into multiple partitions.
There are no GUI tools that can do this, to the best of my knowledge,
though perhaps the Disk Management (diskmgmt.msc) snap-in can.
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:24:40 +0330
Mohammad
Thanks a lot for this answer.
> > 3. If one use a 5.8 snapshot (i.e [1] ), is it possible to apply updates
> > for 5.8 *-stable* later?
>
> No. As I said earlier (and would be clear from a careful reading of the
FAQ),
> snapshots track -current, not -stable.
Finding an install58.iso in a snapshot
On 2015-09-23 09:41, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:55:21PM +0200, Thuban wrote:
Is it possible to upgrade from 5.7 yo 5.8 using this flag :
cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -rOPENBSD_5_8 -P src
In almost all cases, a binary upgrade followed by sysmerge will be
quicker
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:37:05AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015-09-22, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > I just updated my current box to yesterdays (2015-09-21) snapshot. Now
> > it won't keep a network address.
> That's a recent bug - should be fixed if you
Josh Grosse wrote:
> On 2015-09-23 09:41, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:55:21PM +0200, Thuban wrote:
>
> >> Is it possible to upgrade from 5.7 yo 5.8 using this flag :
> >> cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -rOPENBSD_5_8 -P src
> >
> > In almost all cases, a binary upgrade
On Tuesday 22 September 2015 09:58:57 Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Karel Gardas [gard...@gmail.com] wrote:
> >> Let me ask, should SR RAID5 survive such testing or is for example
> >> rebuilding with off-lined drive considered
Em 23-09-2015 11:49, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> Exactly. It also makes it easier to handle multiple ISPs for load-balancing
> or failover, which IPv6 handles poorly (short of using BGP).
Wouldn't multipath and properly constructed ifstated scripts be better
in this case? Like reloading dhcpv6
Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2015, 14:55 +0200 schrieb Thuban:
> 1. A snapshot is a build made at one time of the developpement, more
> recent than *-stable* flavor.
Correct.
> It is not *-current*. Can we consider a snapshot as an unreleased
> *5.8*
> at this time. Or is it above *5.8*?
At this
Em 23-09-2015 11:16, Marios Makassikis escreveu:
> Rather than announcing the prefix obtained via DHCPv6-PD you can pick a prefix
> from fd00::/8 and announce that on your network.
> It is the equivalent to RFC1918 addresses, except it is for IPv6.
Figured it. These are ULA, right?
> Therefore,
On Monday 21 September 2015 23:02:39 Karel Gardas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> due to work on SR RAID1 check summing support where I've touched SR
> RAID internals (workunit scheduling) I'd like to test SR RAID5/6
> functionality on snapshot and on my tree to see that I've not broken
> the stuff while
On 2015/09/23 16:16, Marios Makassikis wrote:
> On 23 September 2015 at 15:34, Giancarlo Razzolini
> wrote:
> > Em 23-09-2015 04:40, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> >> Saves messing about with DHCPv6-PD
> >
> > I see. So you translate from what exactly? Wouldn't it be better
On 2015-09-23 10:52, Ted Unangst wrote:
You may well be the first person to even try it.
Peter was correct, though. It is *possible*. :)
I haven't produced live media since 5.1, so it's been several years
since I last needed to do this. And, if I'd done a better job of
pre-launch
Giancarlo,
Why are you unable to route your DHCPv6-PD? I ask because I have been
able to use OpenBSD as a typical IPv4 NAT type of router as well as a
pure IPv6 router (does use pf for firewalling the router and the PD
subnet, but no NAT on IPv6) all for my home network LAN.
I use a fair bit of
Hello,
Zombies are often attacking ports which don't have services running,
such as telnet (most popular indeed), mysql, 3551, 8080, 13272, etc.
With a default pf block drop in on $ext_if, how can those source ips be
added to a table? Which all can be dropped & small queued.
I've tried to
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 01:27:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/09/23 08:16, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > Can you point me at the bug fix? I was looking at cvsweb again and the
> > newest change I could see there is 2 weeks ago...
> I believe this is the issue fixed by this commit -
> This picture shows
>
> Load address: Loader Data (2) 0xd0 for 4096KB FATAL
>
> This is what I want to know. 0xd0 + 4M is overlapping the kernel
> area.
>
> I think the following diff or
>
> http://yasuoka.net/~yasuoka/BOOTX64.EFI
> (updated)
>
> will fix the problem.
Great,
On 2015-09-22, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Nat on IPv6? Why?
Saves messing about with DHCPv6-PD ;)
On 2015-09-22, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> I just updated my current box to yesterdays (2015-09-21) snapshot. Now
> it won't keep a network address.
That's a recent bug - should be fixed if you update again.
> I'm seeing a note on the current FAQ from the 12th
On 2015-09-22, Daniel Gillen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I currently have the following rule to nat traffic out to the internet:
>
> match out on $if_ext inet6 from $if_int:network to any nat-to ($if_ext)
>
> But this chooses from one of the configures addresses (using round-robin).
Is there anything that can be done to get HDMI video functioning on this HP
Pavilion 10 10-f015au? (dmesg below)
After switching several times between virtual consoles with X11 running, it
will begin to mostly mirror the laptop display on the HDMI device (a
Toshiba Regza TV). It will be missing
* Stefan Sperling le [22-09-2015 11:33:28 +0200]:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Thuban wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a usb wifi dongle supposed to work with urtwn firmware.
> > usbdevs returns WNA 1000Mv2 Netgear listed here [0]
> >
> > But the device is detected as
Nevermind! Worked it out⦠I spotted that the pings I were doing from the
gateways were using the source address of the external interface, which was
not part of the SA.
explicitly adding the source address of the *internal* interface means it now
looks good:
# traceroute6 -s
The reason I am so onto this, is, there has been so many posts and
threads has been here praising the PC Engines APU boards. I assume
quite a few of you use it as a router, given its Ethernet ports. Then,
why not add a wireless access point, too? That might be a popular
request as well.
Wi-Fi is
Craig Skinner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Zombies are often attacking ports which don't have services running,
> such as telnet (most popular indeed), mysql, 3551, 8080, 13272, etc.
>
> With a default pf block drop in on $ext_if, how can those source ips be
> added to a table? Which all can be
Hi all,
I’ve just tried to set up an IPSec tunnel between two IPv6 networks, over
IPv6 between the OpenBSD gateways. Isakmpd seems to have set the SAs up, but
traffic is not flowing over the tunnel.
A ipsec.conf:
ike dynamic esp from 2001:470:1f1d:301::/64 to 2001:41c8:11a:5::/64 local
> I bought this card for my APU:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005HMZ8B2/
>
> Has worked great in AP mode. You will need the
> bracket to make it full height. When I bought
> it, it was $15, too.
>
> If I remember correctly, it shipped from China or
> Tiawan and the estimate was a month, but it
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Joel Sing wrote:
> RAID5 should work (ignore RAID6 - it is still incomplete) and rebuilding
> should be functional:
>
> http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article=20150413071009
>
> When I reenabled RAID5, I had tested it reasonably as I could, but
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:40:52 -0500
Brian Conway wrote:
>> This picture shows
>>
>> Load address: Loader Data (2) 0xd0 for 4096KB FATAL
>>
>> This is what I want to know. 0xd0 + 4M is overlapping the kernel
>> area.
>>
>> I think the following diff or
>>
>>
On 2015-09-23, Adam wrote:
>> I bought this card for my APU:
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005HMZ8B2/
>>
>> Has worked great in AP mode. You will need the
>> bracket to make it full height. When I bought
>> it, it was $15, too.
>>
>> If I remember correctly, it
On 2015-09-23, David Dahlberg wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2015, 14:55 +0200 schrieb Thuban:
>>
>> Is it possible to upgrade from 5.7 yo 5.8 using this flag :
>> cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -rOPENBSD_5_8 -P src
>
> Er, ay, never done it this way but I should
39 matches
Mail list logo