Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2010-01-12 Thread François Leblanc
ase that we can integrate in opensc and improve (the last version of 'minidrivers' is 7)... Regards, François -Message d'origine- De : Jan Suhr [mailto:j...@suhr.info] Envoyé : mardi 12 janvier 2010 18:34 À : François Leblanc Objet : Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-12 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Montag 12 Oktober 2009 08:45:42 schrieb François Leblanc: > Yes absolutely. The "cardmod.h" copyright need some attention. For opensccm > prototypes come from the cardmod.h. can you have a look at "Smart Card Minidriver Specification" v7? The documentation is public available at http://www.micr

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-12 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
OK. When you finish functionality, ping me so we can work on building. The winscard.h issue is strange... As there is a solution in sources for the absent of winscard on win32. But we will work this out. 2009/10/12 François Leblanc : > >>1. You don't need to check in versioninfo.rc > > Ok. > >>2.

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-12 Thread François Leblanc
>1. You don't need to check in versioninfo.rc Ok. >2. I don't understand the empty winscard.h Since I don't want to modify "cardmod.h" (it's not my file) and this file include winscard.h but I don't have winscard.h with my cross compiler tool mingw32... >3. If not absolutely required, put ope

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-12 Thread François Leblanc
> >> +// THIS CODE AND INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF >ANY >> +// KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE >> +// IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR FITNESS FOR A >PARTICULAR >> +// PURPOSE. > >I don't see any reason why we are allowed

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-12 Thread François Leblanc
>we could define some new structure with reader parameters to be passed >as third argument and store the values there. still a hack, but I wonder >if that would be cleaner than using the config file code as transport. > >not sure, what does everyone else think? Ok, I see now what you mean. >I

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-12 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Montag 12 Oktober 2009 08:45:42 schrieb François Leblanc: > Hi Andreas, > > Thank you for your comments, > > >things come to my mind: > >* add a few comments where the new pcsc_card and pcsc_ctx are looked at, > > so people know "ah, the basecsp with pcsc connection given to us". > > also do y

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-12 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2009/10/12 Alon Bar-Lev : > I don't see any reason why we cannot use this... > > +//  THIS CODE AND INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY > +//  KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE > +//  IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR FITNESS FOR A PA

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-12 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
I don't see any reason why we cannot use this... +// THIS CODE AND INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY +// KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE +// IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR +// PURPOSE. On Mon, Oc

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-12 Thread Kalev Lember
On 10/12/2009 09:45 AM, François Leblanc wrote: >> * we need to check copyright situation with the cardmod.h file and maybe >> you used some template or similar for the ccm? then we need to give >> proper reference etc. a few other files need a copyright header too. >> > > Yes absolutely. The "

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-11 Thread François Leblanc
Hi Andreas, Thank you for your comments, > >things come to my mind: >* add a few comments where the new pcsc_card and pcsc_ctx are looked at, > so people know "ah, the basecsp with pcsc connection given to us". > also do you need the config file code for testing? if not, we could > drop it (o

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-09 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Build issues: 1. You don't need to check in versioninfo.rc 2. I don't understand the empty winscard.h 3. If not absolutely required, put opensccm.reg in ANSI format so we can edit it easily in other platforms. UCS-2 is difficult to maintain. 4. Why do you need to install cardmod.h winscard.h, but a

Re: [opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-09 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Hi, wow, nice work! things come to my mind: * add a few comments where the new pcsc_card and pcsc_ctx are looked at, so people know "ah, the basecsp with pcsc connection given to us". also do you need the config file code for testing? if not, we could drop it (or is there a useful way to do

[opensc-devel] Opensc minidriver for base csp.

2009-10-08 Thread François Leblanc
Hi, I've joined a patch to build a windows minidriver useable with basecsp. This patch produce a dll named "opensccm.dll" (only for window of course) and a binary testcsp.exe You have to change "atr" value and put yours on "opensccm.reg" before to register. I've successfully have certifi