Certainly... I understand. Given that you could achieve your desired
results, would you opt for a lower or higher ISO? My guess is one usually
opts for the lowest ISO possible.
For me personally, if I could get a FF DLSR that was great at ISO 200 - 800,
comparable to the same ISO film, and if
John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:48:17PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
With the caveat regarding who knows about Pentax?...
I'd take a full frame sensor that did very well between 200 - 400 ISO any
day (ISO 800) w/b nice, over any sensor that had marginal high ISO
performance at 1600
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Certainly... I understand. Given that you could achieve your desired
results, would you opt for a lower or higher ISO? My guess is one usually
opts for the lowest ISO
Adam Maas wrote:
Tom C wrote:
With the caveat regarding who knows about Pentax?...
I'd take a full frame sensor that did very well between 200 - 400 ISO any
day (ISO 800) w/b nice, over any sensor that had marginal high ISO [ ... ]
I get results at ISO1600+ on film that I would
I'll third that. She'll have lots of aunties and uncles around the globe
when she travels.
D
Bob Sullivan wrote:
I'll second that Bill.
She should be our adopted granddaughter.
Nice picture Paul...
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/21/07, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lovely shot.
The good feelings are much appreciated. Especially today. Going to be
a tough one. Have to get my mother to a doctor. She's just hanging on
by a thread. It's hard to watch. A peaceful ending would be a blessing.
Paul
On Oct 22, 2007, at 5:34 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
I'll third that. She'll
It's during the running scenes. There's about five-ten seconds of him
running around one of the curves.
CW
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: GFM in October
Mark,
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Paul,
From your lips to God's ears...
Good luck to her.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/22/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The good feelings are much appreciated. Especially today. Going to be
a tough one. Have to get my mother to a doctor. She's just hanging on
by a thread. It's hard to
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
Any thoughts?
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RxyWRFjUSXI/A1M/gqjX5arUvnU/s1600-h/oct_22+006.jpg
cheers and thanks,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
On 10/19/07, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two disclaimers:
1. Not Pentax
2. Not Art. Just aaaw
..and one warning: Adorable kitten!
With all that out of the way... http://charles.robinsontwins.org/
photos/2007/best/pages/page_79.html
Well, I like cats, and this is a
HAR!
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:09 AM
Subject: OT: Is it just me...
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
frank theriault wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
Any thoughts?
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RxyWRFjUSXI/A1M/gqjX5arUvnU/s1600-h/oct_22+006.jpg
cheers and
On 10/21/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grace has been determined to crawl up a slide the wrong way. She made
it today.
DA 16-45 at f4, 21 mm.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553758size=lg
She's such a cutie!
Thanks for posting it, Paul...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness
Tom C wrote:
Certainly... I understand. Given that you could achieve your desired
results, would you opt for a lower or higher ISO? My guess is one usually
opts for the lowest ISO possible.
For me personally, if I could get a FF DLSR that was great at ISO 200 - 800,
comparable to the
On 10/20/07, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The obligatory tourist shot from GFM for those that haven't been there in
October.
Taken with the Optio MX at f2.9
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6548526
Gorgeous!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
On 10/21/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meet Fluffy...
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/PESO02/photo#5123874132768234114
I told my wife we had two skunks who occasionally came by at night. I
told her one was white. She threw out leftover popcorn this morning
and was
Thanks for looking.
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/21/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grace has been determined to crawl up a slide the wrong way. She made
it today.
DA 16-45 at f4, 21 mm.
On 10/21/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a test shot, playing around with Tony Sweets method in the house
the other day.
Shot a few indoor flowers and Lucy happened to be sitting on the
couch, so i played around a bit.
Interesting. I think i would have liked it better if the fogged panel had
extended to the ground. But it's still a keeper.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
It works for me - a very unusual and intriguing composition.
The noise suits the mood as well.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters
Quoting frank
In the Pentax dpreview forum a commet was made that Pentax has pushed back
new dslr intros to January '08. Apparently Hoya wants to make sure that all
is done right and everything is functioning the way it is supposed to.
DG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
Any thoughts?
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RxyWRFjUSXI/A1M/gqjX5arUvnU/s1600-h/oct_22+006.jpg
Wow, great one, Frank!
David Savage wrote:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
I am now wiping coffee off my computer monitor...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 10/22/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
Holy S%#
-f
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Thanks, Frank
I think it was Ansel Adams who said if you get one good photo a year, you've
done well. This is mine for 2007.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:58 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss
On 22/10/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
Oh my god - you're absolutely right.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Doug Franklin wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Personally, I disagree with that. At least, I'd much rather have
subjective critiques of my photos.
There is /no/ such thing as an objective critique from a human. There
/cannot/ be one. There are ones that make a greater effort than others
On 10/22/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
...
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
Morning like this, I just want to turn around and crawl back into bed.
Nicely caught, Frank. You
cbwaters wrote:
HAR!
Did he pose for it?
ann who Hars also
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:09 AM
Subject: OT: Is it just me...
...or does this character resemble our very
On 10/22/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/10/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
Oh my god - you're absolutely right.
On 10/22/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/10/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
Oh my god - you're absolutely right.
On 22/10/07, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
On 22/10/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
Oh my god - you're absolutely right.
The resemblance is amazing!!!
Bill
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On 10/22/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh my god - you're absolutely right.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
*SPLORF*
Dammit, that was a good cup of coffee, too!
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On 10/22/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, great one, Frank! I *really* like this.
Funny, but I kept thinking about you when I was processing this. Kept
thinking about one of your favourite quotes from Mr. Hugh Morton:
Bad weather makes good photographs.
Thanks for the kind
On Oct 22, 2007, at 5:34 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RxyWRFjUSXI/A1M/
gqjX5arUvnU/s1600-h/oct_22+006.jpg
This is great stuff, Frank! Very mysterious, moody, cool picture!
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 10/21/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had a tough time getting a pic of Grace in the sandbox. The
light is almost always horrible when we're at the park, and it's hard
for me to get low enough to get a nice angle. Today, I set the DA
16-45 at 16mm and held it just off the
I tried getting in touch with a feeling about this, but have to say,
'very mysterious' is all I'm left with.
Maybe that's enough.(?)
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than
Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-). Grandpa had a senior moment and posted
the wrong URL. Here's the sandbox shot.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553835
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/21/07, Paul Stenquist
not enough mustache
David Savage wrote:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
frank theriault wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
Any thoughts?
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RxyWRFjUSXI/A1M/gqjX5arUvnU/s1600-h/oct_22+006.jpg
cheers and
On 10/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-). Grandpa had a senior moment and
posted the wrong URL. Here's the sandbox shot.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553835
That's the pic I was commenting on (even though I replied to your
That makes sense. Grandpa still in his Monday morning fog:-)
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-). Grandpa had a senior moment and
posted
On 22/10/07, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
not enough mustache
Good point. Also, wasn't there a larval Lepidoptera attached to the chin?
Hey, we all go through that phase.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
frank theriault wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
Any thoughts?
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RxyWRFjUSXI/A1M/gqjX5arUvnU/s1600-h/oct_22+006.jpg
cheers and thanks,
Doug Brewer wrote:
David Savage wrote:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
not enough mustache
That might not be the wisest comment to make to people who know how to
use Photoshop.
--
PDML
Now Derby is channeling Peppi Lepue. This place just keeps getting
stranger and stranger.
Derby Chang wrote:
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Meet Fluffy...
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/PESO02/photo#5123874132768234114
I told my wife we had two skunks who occasionally came by at night.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
David Savage wrote:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
not enough mustache
That might not be the wisest comment to make to people who know how to
use
Yes but that lead to a proposal for a Nuclear Ramjet cruse missile No
payload needed, just circle it over you're enemies territory until
everything died.
John Sessoms wrote:
From: graywolf
A conspiracy theory there, Bob? Personally I like the one for the
nucular engines for the B-1
Tri-X heads shooting available light were always looking for more speed.
It was the content that counted not so much the quality. I find that
both the *ist-D and Ds give better results at 1600 than most any film
I've ever used. It's worth raving about.
Tom C wrote:
With the caveat regarding
It would be better if it were a little less centered.
frank theriault wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
Any thoughts?
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
Kind of spooky - good fit for a Hallowe'en weekend.
-p
frank theriault wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
Any thoughts?
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
Most of you guys are missing my point, or maybe I'm not acknowledging that I
get yours.
I'm just trying to say that high ISO quality seems to viewed as a holy grail
in digital photography, and my perception, right, wrong, or skewed, is that
with film photography it was generally accepted that
Heck, I've finally learned to compose for the 35mm frame, and unlike
some people I know the 6x9 format well predates the popularity of 35mm
double frame cameras.
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Toralf Lund
graywolf wrote:
Or something like a 24x30 or 24x32 frame?
Or 24x28,
On 22/10/07, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
not enough mustache
That might not be the wisest comment to make to people who know how to
use Photoshop.
unless one holds the keys to the kingdom
I'm bailing.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 10/22/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be better if it were a little less centered.
I agree - perhaps that, along with the fact that the mist only frosted
the top half of the bus shelter (leaving the figure's bottom 1/2
relatively sharp) are why I'm ambivalent about it (I
My best to you and her, Paul. I lost my mother in August, just a couple
weeks before her 89th birthday. Sometimes it's hard to put aside our
own impending sense of loss and acknowledge that a peaceful ending is,
indeed, the blessing our loved ones need.
-p
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The good
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
David Savage wrote:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
not enough mustache
That might not be the wisest comment to make to people who know how to
use
I had in my mind either a shot at the top of the slide or the bottom
- either would have been more dramatic in showing the 'climb' - as it
is, it's a nice snap for the album. She is cute as always.
--
Bruce
Sunday, October 21, 2007, 6:28:18 PM, you wrote:
PS Grace has been determined to
On 10/22/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ET, Go home...
I see what you mean -- it would drive me nuts if I took it (for your
reasons) -- the overall feel is wonderful but the
alien's shape is a problem, I think...
Not much help - sorry
That shape doesn't bother me that much -
Pretty good, really. You got a good angle on her and the light seems
reasonably tamed. Good shot, there!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, October 21, 2007, 6:43:19 PM, you wrote:
PS Wrong URL on this one. Should be:
PS http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553835
PS On Oct 21, 2007, at
No I get your point. But Film quality has improved immensely in 100
years. High ISO, or ASA or DIN was once in the 100 range. and very
grainy. The bar keeps being raised. What is now unacceptable was at one
time the norm. It seems to me that you're making the mistake of
believing that things
All that blood flow being redirected away from the brain has side effects...
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/22/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thinking about girls makes you dumb.
Mark Roberts wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Paul Sorenson wrote:
Oops...you're right. But it does make you have
It may be a snap, but you did capture the feeling of festivity. Nice
one.
--
Bruce
Sunday, October 21, 2007, 4:50:37 AM, you wrote:
DC I like this snap, but there were sad consequences after right after this
DC shot. Had forgotten to charge the liths before the fest. So with the
DC camera
One reason why High ISO quality is such a hobbyhorse is that so many people are
trying to achieve shots that need a fast prime with a slow (f4 or slower) zoom.
You NEED good high ISO when you're stuck at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the guy next
to you is shooting wide open with his 85/1.4 at ISO 800.
It's ok - at least to me - not outstanding. Part of the issue I think
is that the glass is heavily fogged but the surroundings are only
lightly foggy. It makes for an imbalance that looks more like the
fogging from breathing on the windows rather than the fog from the
weather. So more of a
Agreed, and I'm one of those available darkness Tri-X heads. Even 3200 on the D
and DS is better than film (I'd rate it similar to most films at 1600).
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
Tri-X heads shooting available light were always looking for more speed.
It was the content that counted not so
On 10/21/07, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this snap, but there were sad consequences after right after this
shot. Had forgotten to charge the liths before the fest. So with the
camera juiceless, I had to watch many photo ops walk by. Pleasant
afternoon though.
Tom C wrote:
Most of you guys are missing my point, or maybe I'm not
acknowledging that I get yours.
I'm just trying to say that high ISO quality seems to viewed as a
holy grail in digital photography, and my perception, right, wrong,
I think you're exactly right, Tom.
Sure there are a few
Anyone who shoots indoor events, including weddings, can benefit from
good high ISO performance. And even family pics and portraits are
much nicer in available light. I think high ISO performance is a good
plus for most photographers. That being said I'm far less offended by
noise and/or
Thanks Bruce. The pop-up flash is sometimes useful.
Paul
On Oct 22, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Pretty good, really. You got a good angle on her and the light seems
reasonably tamed. Good shot, there!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, October 21, 2007, 6:43:19 PM, you wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
But high ISO performance has become the holy grail for a lot of people
who don't really need it.
Of course, if it sells cameras then the camera makers have to go for
it...
That's a big paradigm shift, huh? It used to be the camera body was
relatively unrelated to ISO
Bill Owens wrote:
I think you're exactly right, Tom.
Sure there are a few who really need high ISO performance: sports pros
often shoot football games with a 600/4 and 2x teleconverter under
stadium lighting at night. Closed down 1 f-stop to recover some
sharpness, they're at f/11 and
I think you're exactly right, Tom.
Sure there are a few who really need high ISO performance: sports pros
often shoot football games with a 600/4 and 2x teleconverter under
stadium lighting at night. Closed down 1 f-stop to recover some
sharpness, they're at f/11 and shooting fast action.
It seems we may be dancing around the term high ISO. How do you define it?
With film I thought 400 was sometimes getting into high ISO territory. With
DSLR's I consider high ISO to be 1600 and above. More or less, when I can
see image degradation without magnification.
Tom C.
From: Paul
I agree. For me frame rate is relatively unimportant compared to buffer
size and throughput.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next
I took this a couple of weeks ago, but Derby's Glorious Beer inspired
me to post it.
http://tinyurl.com/2ncypz
Like Derby's just a snap...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
NEVER, perhaps uniquely with me. Didn't ever care for the 'stark,
gritty, under belly of life' genre.
S'pose that could make me less than complete. ;)
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone who shoots indoor events, including weddings, can benefit from
good high ISO
It's a little cluttered.
frank theriault wrote:
I took this a couple of weeks ago, but Derby's Glorious Beer inspired
me to post it.
http://tinyurl.com/2ncypz
Like Derby's just a snap...
cheers,
frank
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
frank theriault wrote:
I took this a couple of weeks ago, but Derby's Glorious Beer inspired
me to post it.
http://tinyurl.com/2ncypz
Like Derby's just a snap...
cheers,
frank
Ahhh, me namesake beer!
Memories!
This place in Toronto?
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 10/22/07, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahhh, me namesake beer!
Memories!
This place in Toronto?
Yeah, a little bar called Magpies at Bathurst and Dundas.
BTW, which beer are you referring to, Peculiar? g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
On 10/22/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a little cluttered.
I kept asking them to clean up a bit so I could take a picture of the
pretty girl, but they ignored me...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Pentax have been making cameras for 56 years; Hoya have been making
them for 56 seconds. So Hoya are telling Pentax how to do it right.
That figures.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of dick graham
Sent: 19 October 2007 20:33
On Oct 21, 2007, at 6:04 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
But does that mean that you gotta be a pro to finally get service, or
does it mean more professional service?
A Professional Services program generally means a package of
equipment loaner/repair/expedited services designed to fit the needs
Closer to 90 years by the way...
Bob W wrote:
Pentax have been making cameras for 56 years; Hoya have been making
them for 56 seconds. So Hoya are telling Pentax how to do it right.
That figures.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 22/10/07, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://tinyurl.com/2ncypz
very nice Frank
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
On 10/22/07, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahhh, me namesake beer!
Memories!
This place in Toronto?
Yeah, a little bar called Magpies at Bathurst and Dundas.
BTW, which beer are you referring to, Peculiar? g
cheers,
frank
But of course, Messr!
When I work with my Minox subminiature cameras, ISO 100 is high ISO...
I have the K10D set to Auto ISO with the range constrained to 100-400
most of the time. Differences in performance are near to invisible in
that range. I go to 800, and very rarely to 1600, when I need more
sensitivity.
In a message dated 10/22/2007 6:57:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 10/22/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
...
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
In a message dated 10/22/2007 7:48:01 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-). Grandpa had a senior moment and
posted the wrong URL. Here's the sandbox shot.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553835
If I was a
In a message dated 10/22/2007 11:02:13 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I took this a couple of weeks ago, but Derby's Glorious Beer inspired
me to post it.
http://tinyurl.com/2ncypz
Like Derby's just a snap...
cheers,
frank
=
Think it needs a lot more
In a message dated 10/22/2007 9:10:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sunday, October 21, 2007, 4:50:37 AM, you wrote:
DC I like this snap, but there were sad consequences after right after this
DC shot. Had forgotten to charge the liths before the fest. So with the
DC
In a message dated 10/22/2007 3:39:50 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The good feelings are much appreciated. Especially today. Going to be
a tough one. Have to get my mother to a doctor. She's just hanging on
by a thread. It's hard to watch. A peaceful ending would
In a message dated 10/22/2007 7:05:16 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 22/10/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
...or does this character resemble our very own listmeister?:
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/scruffy.dhtml
=
Not
If I can't capture a hockey game with players clothed in black and played by
candle light, the glass is NOT fast enough and the ISO is NOT high enough!
If I can't capture a timber wolf racing through a dense forest by starlight,
the glass is NOT fast enough and the ISO is NOT high enough!
If I
On 10/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Think it needs a lot more contrast, frank. Also maybe some lightening of
shadows around her face. It's a little too muted down and a little too one
tone.
Just how conversant are you with PS or something similar, these days?
Marnie
In a message dated 10/22/2007 1:44:18 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is a bit muddy.
My problem is that I'm doing this stuff on a laptop, and when I move
my head a couple of degrees up or down the contrast changes markedly.
I never know where the sweet spot is, so
Thanks Marnie. She's very nice to the other little girls, so
hopefully they won't hate her :-).
Paul
On Oct 22, 2007, at 4:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/22/2007 7:48:01 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-).
Excellent shot. Would love to see it with brighter midrange tones.
Paul
On Oct 22, 2007, at 2:01 PM, frank theriault wrote:
I took this a couple of weeks ago, but Derby's Glorious Beer inspired
me to post it.
http://tinyurl.com/2ncypz
Like Derby's just a snap...
cheers,
frank
--
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
