Hi community,
i have set up a windows based GFI faxserver to send and receive fax and sms
messages.
the fax and sms connectors (faxmaker.com and smsmaker.com) for this faxserver
are hostet on a other external exchange server.
fax and sms messages are sended with smtp protocol.
every time my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2010 05:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Watts:
I have a requirement to be able to monitor a postfix queue over time,
and to determine whether any messages are delayed due to problems
connecting to a remote servers.
The mail system
On 11/29/2010 03:15 PM, Schwalbe, Oliver wrote:
Hi community,
i have set up a windows based GFI faxserver to send and receive fax
and sms messages.
the fax and sms connectors (faxmaker.com and smsmaker.com) for this
faxserver are hostet on a other external exchange server.
fax and sms
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:53:43AM +0100, Mauro wrote:
On 29 November 2010 01:56, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:36:12PM -0700, ghe wrote:
I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
well close port 25. How
On 2010-11-29 Jon L Miller wrote:
I'm getting a return error message when I try to send an email to a
particular user:
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.domain.com.au
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: B371FF687
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; jlmil...@mmtnetworks.com.au
Arrival-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:26:33 +0800
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:09:30PM +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-11-29 Jon L Miller wrote:
I'm getting a return error message when I try to send an email to a
particular user:
Do note, we strongly prefer to see logs here.
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.domain.com.au
Also note, it's
Dear all,
Is it possible to configure postfix for the following scenario?
Our ERP-System wants to send emails over a dedicated account to it's users.
As it tries to send the email as the current user, using the users address,
the e-mail gets rejected by our provider (who is running
On 11/29/2010 9:24 AM, michael.h.gr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear all,
Is it possible to configure postfix for the following scenario?
Our ERP-System wants to send emails over a dedicated account
to it's users. As it tries to send the email as the current
user, using the users address, the
Am 29.11.2010 16:24, schrieb michael.h.gr...@googlemail.com:
Dear all,
Is it possible to configure postfix for the following scenario?
Our ERP-System wants to send emails over a dedicated account to it's
users. As it tries to send the email as the current user, using the
users address, the
Hi,
I have a client with Postfix used as the main mail relay for a high
volume e-commerce site. All mail to outbound destinations is relayed
from sendmail processes to 2 main Postfix processes in the DMZ. Postfix
relays everything to a separate Postini server outside.
They've come to me
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:40:13AM -0500, Stirling, Scott wrote:
What I have not found and am for which I am requesting help, if anyone
has a pointer or experience in this area, is the ability to combine the
sender_dependent configuration with a recipient condition. Is there a
straightforward
What I have not found and am for which I am requesting help, if
anyone has a pointer or experience in this area, is the ability
to combine the sender_dependent configuration with a recipient
condition. Is there a straightforward way to configure this?
Or do I need to script a custom
Le 29/11/2010 08:53, Mauro a écrit :
On 29 November 2010 01:56, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:36:12PM -0700, ghe wrote:
I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
well close port 25. How can I do that?
I'd
Le 29/11/2010 19:22, Stirling, Scott a écrit :
What I have not found and am for which I am requesting help, if
anyone has a pointer or experience in this area, is the ability
to combine the sender_dependent configuration with a recipient
condition. Is there a straightforward way to configure
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:22:31PM -0500, Stirling, Scott wrote:
This requires a second internal delivery hop.
The first to separate out the recipients or senders that are candidates
for bypassing Postini into a separate queue, and the second to route
appropriate mail from that queue,
Hi,
I am going to have to implement something that drops rejected mail from
one of our aliases.
The scenario is that we forward to a external server and cannot match
its spam/UCE rules so our server backskatters mail.
One way would be to drop all rejects. I think this will work because our
Zitat von Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
Hi,
I am going to have to implement something that drops rejected mail
from one of our aliases.
The scenario is that we forward to a external server and cannot
match its spam/UCE rules so our server backskatters mail.
One way would be to
Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
I am going to have to implement something that drops rejected mail
from one of our aliases.
The scenario is that we forward to a external server and cannot
match its spam/UCE rules so our server backskatters mail.
If this alias is a mail
What I have not found and am for which I am requesting help, if
anyone has a pointer or experience in this area, is the ability
to combine the sender_dependent configuration with a recipient
condition. Is there a straightforward way to configure this?
Or do I need to script a custom
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:51:53PM -0500, Stirling, Scott wrote:
Thank you. With yours and Victor's input it sounds like I can do the
first relay with the existing Postfix processes, configuring a
sender_dependent relay to secondary instances of Postfix to handle
candidates for custom routing
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
Hi,
I am going to have to implement something that drops rejected mail
from one of our aliases.
The scenario is that we forward to a external server and cannot match
its spam/UCE rules so our server backskatters
Thank you. With yours and Victor's input it sounds like I can do the
first relay with the existing Postfix processes, configuring a
sender_dependent relay to secondary instances of Postfix to handle
candidates for custom routing from this Sender.
Then in the secondary Postfix instances
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:01:45PM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
So to rephrase, what would be the best practices way given I have to do
forward this email and am powerless to change the design other than our
setup which may only include trying to mitigate backskatter?
If list expansion
On 2010-11-29 Randy Ramsdell wrote:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
I am going to have to implement something that drops rejected mail
from one of our aliases.
The scenario is that we forward to a external server and cannot
match its spam/UCE
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:07:43PM -0500, Stirling, Scott wrote:
Thank you. With yours and Victor's input it sounds like I can do the
first relay with the existing Postfix processes, configuring a
sender_dependent relay to secondary instances of Postfix to handle
candidates for custom
These are not keywords, they are transport names. Transports are
defined in master.cf.
Ahh, so the names are conventional, configurable. Flexible
configurability is a theme with Postfix.
The smtp transport is for other people's domains, the relay
transport is for your domains that are
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:01:45PM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
So to rephrase, what would be the best practices way given I have to do
forward this email and am powerless to change the design other than our
setup which may only include trying to mitigate backskatter?
Zitat von Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
Hi,
I am going to have to implement something that drops rejected mail
from one of our aliases.
The scenario is that we forward to a external server and cannot
Randy Ramsdell:
We simply alias
$user $u...@$othermailserver
The $users we forward to are known by our mail server and no mail will
forward otherwise. I cannot think of a scenario which rejected mail from
$othermailserver would be anything other than UCE in this case. The
fringe
Zitat von Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:01:45PM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
So to rephrase, what would be the best practices way given I have
to do forward this email and am powerless to change the design
other than our setup
On 11/29/2010 12:28 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
We simply alias
$user $u...@$othermailserver
The $users we forward to are known by our mail server and no mail will
forward otherwise. I cannot think of a scenario which rejected mail
from $othermailserver would be anything other than UCE in
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
My client has Postfix 2.3.3. Must I update to 2.6+ to run multiple
instances side-by-side? Could I manually create an instance by, e.g.,
creating an /etc/postfix-foo with main.cf and master.cf, and configure
them to use different files and
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:39:40PM -0500, Stirling, Scott wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
My client has Postfix 2.3.3. Must I update to 2.6+ to run multiple
instances side-by-side?
No, but you won't have the postmulti(1) tooling at your disposal.
Could I manually
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:39:40PM -0500, Stirling, Scott wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
My client has Postfix 2.3.3. Must I update to 2.6+ to run multiple
instances side-by-side? Could I manually create an instance by,
e.g., creating an /etc/postfix-foo with
On 11/29/2010 02:39 PM, Stirling, Scott wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
My client has Postfix 2.3.3. Must I update to 2.6+ to run multiple
instances side-by-side? Could I manually create an instance by, e.g.,
creating an /etc/postfix-foo with main.cf and master.cf, and
Hello,
After upgrading from 2.5.x to 2.7.1 mail started queuing up to one particular
domain (TLS security level: verify) with Server certificate not verified.
Systems still on 2.5.x versions of Postfix transmit messages to that domain via
enforced TLS just fine. Based on some testing with
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 02:44:31AM +, Mueller, Martin (Messaging) wrote:
After upgrading from 2.5.x to 2.7.1 mail started queuing up to one
particular domain (TLS security level: verify) with Server certificate
not verified.
Postfix TLS support has not changed noticeably since 2.5.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:56:08AM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
When testing with Postfix 2.7 compiled against OpenSSL 1.0.0a and also
1.0.0b with two patches from the upcoming 1.0.0c (due any day now)
everything is normal. Your OpenSSL is perhaps less fortuitously selected
than mine.
I get
On Nov 28, 2010, at 8:18 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
My current theory is that the issue is FrontBridge specific, and is the
result of some firewall or proxy software in front of Microsoft Exchange.
An update; I gather there are eyes on the problem.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Please have your
39 matches
Mail list logo
