hi postfix-users@
my /etc/postfix/transport, transport_maps:
google.com smtp1:
yahoo.com smtp2:
it is working nicely :) but i would like to use my origin/domain:
>From m...@nyinternaldomain smtp1:
undertstand ? is it possible ?
Hello all!
I recently added mlmmj as a mailing list manager to my postfix server.
My concern is that I don’t overwhelm the big boys (yahoo, google, iCloud) and
have them rate limit me because I am sending to too many addresses to quickly.
Here are my transport settings for mlmmj
Hi all,
I'm facing with a strange problem with my Postfix machine.
I have some different IP addresses and dovecot as po3-before-smtp
authentication system.
I can login to postfix using userna...@mydomain.com + password and send
emails using default smtp transport (these emails are sent throug
Postfix is only mapping email addresses and not FQDNs. Mapping works
for u...@mydomain.com but not mydomain.com, .mydomain.com or @mydomain.com.
# postmap -q localhost mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_transport_maps.cf
# postmap -q list2@localhost mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_transport_maps.cf
mailman:
my
* Antonio Hooper :
> hi postfix-users@
>
> my /etc/postfix/transport, transport_maps:
>
> google.com smtp1:
> yahoo.com smtp2:
OK
> it is working nicely :) but i would like to use my origin/domain:
>
> From m...@nyinternaldomain smtp1:
>
> unde
2009/6/9 Ralf Hildebrandt
>
> * Antonio Hooper :
> > hi postfix-users@
> >
> > my /etc/postfix/transport, transport_maps:
> >
> > google.com smtp1:
> > yahoo.com smtp2:
>
> OK
>
> > it is working nicely :) but i would like to
* Antonio Hooper :
> > No. Do you want sender based routing?
> exactly. is it possible ?
http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html
Supporting multiple ISP accounts in the Postfix SMTP client
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://ww
randt
> Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
> http://www.computerbeschimpfung.de
> "The Internet is like a giant jellyfish. You can't step on it. You
> can't go around it. You've got to get through it."-John
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 02:24:49PM -0300, Antonio Hooper wrote:
> > http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html
> > Supporting multiple ISP accounts in the Postfix SMTP client
>
> with transport, i do: master.cf:
> smtp_teste unix - - n - -
Hi,
I'm wondering if it's smart to set a "default transport" like this "*...@*"
to "smtp:[mail.server.com]" so I don't have to specify for every domain
that I have on the server, and would just have to specify for those who
need a different tran
ss in
Transport Mapping under Postfix in Webmin. But, I get the following
error:
Admin Email Notification Sending Failed - SMTP Error: The following
recipients failed: u...@deluxetech.com
SMTP server error: 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
virtual alias table
I have my Transport Mappi
mail
to the MX records of smtp.example.com.
I tried using transport maps, "example.com :[smtp1.example.com]" and
" example.com smtp:[smtp1.example.com], but of them didn't use
smtp.example.com.
Please help me set this one up.
~LA
Hi all.
Is it possible to have a transport map with a regular expression? What I
want is to use an external relay server for all the emails to be delivered
on Yahoo domains (eg, yahoo.com, yahoo.co.uk, yahoo.es, ecc).
If it is possible, how can I implement this?
Thanks.
-JK
Marc Silver put forth on 11/10/2009 2:23 AM:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:03:56 +0200, Jack Knowlton
> wrote:
>> Is it possible to have a transport map with a regular expression? What I
>> want is to use an external relay server for all the emails to be
>> del
Hello,
When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error:
postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/transport.db: duplicate entry: "example.com"
example.com smtp:[10.2.4.7]
example.com smtps:[10.2.4.7]
What is the correct syntax to have both?
Thank you,
Cameron
.x.x !test !test.cu 10.25.x.x I don't know if this is actually
functional in postfix. in this case I would like to have a transport for
all mail except the ones with the destination domain .ca. In other words I
don't know if I have to use domain_transport or transport_maps but I would
like
Would postfix query first table A and if not getting a match, moves to
query table B ?
If the transport given by table A defers the email (eg by connection
timeout), would postfix use the results from table B?
In my case I've
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport, tcp:[127.0.0.1]:
I just started using Dovecot's lmtp agent instead of the lda via pipe.
The "common" directions for this - which are working for me - is to
simply set the appropriate transport in main.cf. In my case:
virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp
My question - do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering if it could be implemented (and if it wise to do it) a sort of
conditional transport
Something like:
try {
normal delivery
} catch (SMTP 4xx) {
requeue for 8 hours
} catch (SMTP 5xx || on_queue > 8 ho
Hello users,
I'm having transport error issues with a new setup
Ubuntu 6.10
Postfix 2.3
I have a GMAIL APPS hosted mail domain tildaworks.com
Oct 15 10:23:20 lexi postfix/qmgr[16975]: 44A8736E1:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=7640,
delays=7639/1.4/0/0, dsn=4.3.0, stat
sses to quickly.
>
> Here are my transport settings for mlmmj.
>
> mlmmj_destination_concurrency_limit = 5
> mlmmj_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = 10
> mlmmj_destination_rate_delay = 1s
> mlmmj_destination_recipient_limit = 1
Caution: with mlmmj_destination_re
(yahoo, google,
>> iCloud) and have them rate limit me because I am sending to too
>> many addresses to quickly.
>>
>> Here are my transport settings for mlmmj.
>>
>> mlmmj_destination_concurrency_limit = 5
>> mlmmj_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_l
* Austin Witmer via Postfix-users:
> Will DMARC be broken if I only add the following headers to mailing
> list messages? [...]
Adding *new* headers can't break existing DKIM signatures, because these
headers cannot have been signed before. New in this case means header
names (not values) which h
Austin Witmer via Postfix-users:
> > You will need SPF, DKIM, and DMARC with 'p=reject'. If this is
> > an interactive list, you will need to replace list member's From:
> > headers with your mailing list address to satisfy DMARC.
>
> I believe I have SPF, DKIM and DMARC setup with p=reject.
>
>
On Jul 22, 2024, at 5:00 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> Austin Witmer via Postfix-users:
>>> You will need SPF, DKIM, and DMARC with 'p=reject'. If this is
>>> an interactive list, you will need to replace list member's From:
>>> headers with your mailing list address to satisfy
Austin Witmer via Postfix-users:
> On Jul 22, 2024, at 5:00?PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> >
> > Austin Witmer via Postfix-users:
> >>> You will need SPF, DKIM, and DMARC with 'p=reject'. If this is
> >>> an interactive list, you will need to replace list member's From:
> >>> he
On 2024-07-22 at 18:58:41 UTC-0400 (Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:58:41 +0200)
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Adding *new* headers can't break existing DKIM signatures, because
these
headers cannot have been signed before. New in this case means header
names (not values) which
* Bill Cole via Postfix-users:
> Some systems are configured to "oversign" headers, essentially signing
> the non-existence.
Shhh! We don't want to advertise that in this scenario, do we? ;-)
Still, you are correct to point out that the DKIM spec allows for these
kinds of shenanigans.
> Any addi
* Bill Cole via Postfix-users:
Some systems are configured to "oversign" headers, essentially signing
the non-existence.
On 24.07.24 02:11, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
Shhh! We don't want to advertise that in this scenario, do we? ;-)
Still, you are correct to point out that the DK
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|>* Bill Cole via Postfix-users:
|>> Some systems are configured to "oversign" headers, essentially signing
|>> the non-existence.
|
|On 24.07.24 02:11, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
|>Shhh! We don't want to advertise that in this
...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
Per conto di i...@itrezero.it
Inviato: martedì 15 luglio 2014 15:45
A: postfix-users@postfix.org
Oggetto: Sender transport settings not override default transport
Hi all,
I'm facing with a strange problem with my Postfix machine.
I ha
i...@itrezero.it:
> Good morning.
> Maybe I wasn't able to write a clear request :-( I'll try another way.
>
> I've a set of IPs. I need to authenticate against each of them
> (useing different accounts on the same domain: us...@domain.com ,
> us...@domain.com , ) and want that emails are to be se
Wietse Venema:
> i...@itrezero.it:
> > Good morning.
> > Maybe I wasn't able to write a clear request :-( I'll try another way.
> >
> > I've a set of IPs. I need to authenticate against each of them
> > (useing different accounts on the same domain: us...@domain.com ,
> > us...@domain.com , ) and
Wietse Venema:
> Wietse Venema:
> > i...@itrezero.it:
> > > Good morning.
> > > Maybe I wasn't able to write a clear request :-( I'll try another way.
> > >
> > > I've a set of IPs. I need to authenticate against each of them
> > > (useing different accounts on the same domain: us...@domain.com ,
for smtp
authentication. I have the same u...@domain.com for authenticating and
sending on behalf of many FROM users (that are a variable-growing number).
So my last questioni is: can I choose smtp transport based on user used for
smtpd authentication?
Thanks again for your help.
Francesco
-
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:05 PM, wrote:
> So my last questioni is: can I choose smtp transport based on user used for
> smtpd authentication?
Have you tried to use check_sasl_access table and return a "FILTER
smtp1:". You will need Postfix version 2.11 or later.
http://www.post
Jose Borges Ferreira:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:05 PM, wrote:
> > So my last questioni is: can I choose smtp transport based on user used for
> > smtpd authentication?
>
> Have you tried to use check_sasl_access table and return a "FILTER
> smtp1:". You will
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 05:17:58PM -0700, David Koski wrote:
> Postfix is only mapping email addresses and not FQDNs. Mapping works
> for u...@mydomain.com but not mydomain.com, .mydomain.com or @mydomain.com.
>
> # postmap -q localhost mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_transport_maps.cf
>
> # postmap -
Hello Viktor,
Indeed, your are right again. I had '%d' in a complex query, changed it
to '%s' and extracted the substring for the domain. That did it! There
are three select statements in a UNION with the others referencing '%s'
already. Too bad there wasn't a switch to make it so '%d' doe
question is this - transport table in Postfix allows matching by
address (user@domain), by domain itself, or the * wildcard can be used,
but what if I want to match mail from every domain that have a specific
server (ip) in their MX record?
The purpose would be this - due to the trouble with
possible
since Postfix 2.7 with this entry to change the transport but not the
nexthop:
"... To override the recipient's transport but not the next-hop
destination, specify an empty filter destination ..."
I use postfix 3.5.6-1+b1 (Debian 11).
My postfix has a transport ta
reading
the very fine documentation. But did I get it right?
In master.cf:
gmail unix - - y - - smtp
-o gmail_destination_concurrency_limit=2
-o gmail_destination_rate_delay=1s
-o gmail_destination_recipient_limit=2
In transport:
gmail.com gmail:
First... Is this reason
e user of other domain hosted on the
same new server send an email to the new migrate domain it will be
relayed to the orld server and not locally delivered.
I try with transport without success.
Can someone plese help me?
Thanks
--
Rispetta l'ambiente: se non ti è necessario, non stampa
Hi
I try to run "backup" transport maps like:
smtpd_sender_login_maps =
#first-main database
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sender_login_maps.cf
#second-backup
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sender_login_maps-backup.cf
Both databases are the same because they are synchroniz
Hi all,
I'm trying to configure postfix for lmtp local delivery - delivery fails with
"transport unavailable" however. lmtpd ist dovecot-lmtp, which works, I can
send mail using smtp-source. Google did only find me questions about "pipe to
dovecot"-style delivery, du
Hi,
We are planning to add maildrop to get some filter functionality, i.e.
reformail. The server is on production, and mail delivering is
configured now with virtual as virtual_transport and courier as MDA (if
helps), and maildrops is already installed from distro repositories.
We plan to use alre
ivery. Once upon a time, my transport table entries
were used but now they seem to be completely ignored. It's driving me
nuts and I cannot figure out why this is happening. All I'm trying to do
is take a set of domains previously virtually hosted and forward them to
a new mail server
Hi List
Hoping to clarify if remote transport mappings can be restricted.
At this point it appears that master_service_disable allows for specific
listeners to be disabled.
However the type of listener/service specific to transport mappings "587
submission" is unclear.
E
Hi!
can anyone please help me to understand how the nexthop works inthe transport
table when using hostnames with multiple IPs?
For instance:
example.com smtp:[gateway.example.com]
gateway.example.com resolves to 3 IP addresses...
- Will Postfix try to resolve gateway.example.com for
Hi guys,
I send my emails via different gateways based on my transport file. Many
domains, however, use the same email providers, such as outlook or
gmail. Is there a way to check the MX records before the email is sent
and transport it using a specific gateway?
Cheers,
Peter
Good day Guys
Im trying to get vacationing going as per the link
https://github.com/postfixadmin/postfixadmin/blob/master/VIRTUAL_VACATION/INSTALL.md
Please can I ask if someone could please peer review my setup.
Its almost like postfix is ignoring the transport.
root@mail ~ # postconf |grep
DKIM (added like documentations)
In log i found double added DKIM - because the mail goes back to the
queue and smtpd_milters tags it again ...
Probably I must create a returns transport with "-o smtpd_milters="
But I dont have idea - maby I thing wrong ...
works fine for 587,465 but n
and instead I'm just using transport
maps, although I'm wondering if that would provide greater flexibility
in terms of where email is delivered.
This is being driven by amavis thinking our always_bcc user is not
being delivered locally when it is. mail01.mycompany.com is the host
associated
nt to be able to generate, on a per message basis, the
behaviours that I currently have statically defined in a transport map.
These are:
(condition1) customtransport:
(condition2) smtp:[othernode]
Is this possible with either mechanism? What would the specific responses
be?
There i
Hi,
For my docent activity, I need to setup a transport like this:
/(.*.dyn.nisu.org)/smtp:[$1]:2500
My students will setup a postfix server in their computers, but they
cannot listen port 25. I update dns dynamically, so the mail directed to
somestudent.dyn.nisu.org will be sent to
Hi,
I'm having some problems with setting a regexp transport map. What I
want is:
1) Mail for u...@domain.com is delivered locally via the Zimbra system.
2) Mail for u...@machine.domain.com should be delivered directly to that
machine.
3) All other (i.e. external) mail should be relaye
configuration.
Looking at logs , not alway but just sometimes i get this:
Apr 9 22:16:54 mail postfix/error[18713]: 72882266C7: to=, relay=none, delay=72807,
delays=72805/1.6/0/0.14, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport
unavailable)
Apr 9 22:16:54 mail postfix/smtpd[18736]: connect from
ons)
from domain.com to an
alternative SMTP (othersmtp.company.com) that is
other than the company's primary MX.
We implemented this, by modifying the /etc/postfix/transport file,
and it worked like a charm.
The problem is that we would like to override the above rule for the domain
customers
k to my post on
Linuxquestions.org where I have also posted this problem:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/postfix-transport-788433/
anyway, I have these two settings:
virtual_transport = virtual
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
in the transport -file I have:
examp
Hello
If I use the command
# mail -v n...@domain.com I get the folloing
Mail delivery status report will be mailed to
But then I get MAILER-DAEMON (mail transport unavailable)
Using FreeBSD 7.2
Postfix 2.6.5
And second instance running
Thanks in advance
_ Motty
Hello, I make rather heavy use of transport_maps as explained in
<http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#transport_maps> and in the
transport(5) section of the man pages.
Today I upgraded my dozen of servers to Postix 2.7 under FreeBSD 7.3,
and got the waring below :
> Note: the
Hi @ll,
is there a way to overide
transport table for specific
sender domains
Backgound:
ich have two domains
which deliver out over a relay
by
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps,
also, there is a mailman list and virtual domains
on the server which deliver directly out
for known reasons i want to
antispams,
antivirus etc, this server scan the message and transport the message to
another server with domain, mailboxes of destination domain.
Oct 6 10:33:47 mta01 postfix/smtpd[2198]: CD4BD249BA:
client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
Oct 6 10:33:47 mta01 postfix/cleanup[2213]: CD4BD249BA:
message-id
Let me take a step back. Let us say that my
main.cf looks like this:
# i don't do local delivery on this machine, so:
mydestination =
#
relayhost = outgo.arlut.utexas.edu
transport_map = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
and transport looks like this:
blarg.arlut.utexas.edu
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 03:12:09PM +0200, Patric Falinder wrote:
> I'm wondering if it's smart to set a "default transport" like this "*...@*"
> to
> "smtp:[mail.server.com]" so I don't have to specify for every domain that I
> have on
Hi , i have relay which smtp transports
to an internal mail server ( work wonderfull )
now i want to use always_bcc
to a local user
seems not work any idea how to solve this?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
oogle Apps. I have setup my email address in
Transport Mapping under Postfix in Webmin. But, I get the following
error:
Admin Email Notification Sending Failed - SMTP Error: The following
recipients failed: u...@deluxetech.com
SMTP server error: 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unkno
See http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
> I have my Transport Mapping as:
> u...@deluxetech.com smtp:deluxetech.com.s9a1.psmtp.com.
The domain needs to be a relay, virtual mailbox, or local domain, not
a virtual alias domain.
> I am pretty sure the issue has to do with t
Hello,
I'm using 2.8.0. I've added a new transport in master.cf :
slow unix - - n - - smtp
-o syslog_name=slow
and the following in main.cf
slow_destination_rate_delay = 20
slow_destination_concurrency_limit = 3
slow_destination_recipient_limi
Hi everybody,
We have a Postfix server that route mail for a specific domain to a remote
host.
The confugration is set in the transport file :
domain1.com relay:[@IP]
I need to configure Postfix to route messages for a lot of users from
domain1.com to a different remote host.
In order
Hi all,
Iam trying to setup autoreply via transport on already running
mail server. My problem is transport isn't triggered instead all
vacation emails are going thru none transport.
main.cf:
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql/transport_maps.cf
in transport table i
When I send a mail to @example.com, postfix must send the mail
> to the MX records of smtp.example.com.
>
> I tried using transport maps, "example.com :[smtp1.example.com]" and
> " example.com smtp:[smtp1.example.com], but of them didn't use
> smtp.exa
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > In simple, When I send a mail to @example.com, postfix must send the mail
> > to the MX records of smtp.example.com.
> example.com smtp.example.com
OK, not too sure if Postfix will perform an MX lookup for the RHS
(smtp.example.com in this example). Please try
--
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 16:53:52 Linux Addict wrote:
>
> I tried using transport maps, "example.com :[smtp1.example.com]"
> and " example.com smtp:[smtp1.example.com], but of them didn't use
> smtp.example.com.
Not clear what you mean here.
Documentati
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt <
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
>
> > > In simple, When I send a mail to @example.com, postfix must send the
> mail
> > > to the MX records of smtp.example.com.
>
> > example.com smtp.example.com
>
> OK, not too
; through Postfix.
>
>
>
What about plain old:
smtp:
and nothing else. I was trying to day to do the opposite but it kept
looking up the mx for the destination domain when I did not have a
transport map.
--
---
C Werclick .Lot
Tec
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Simon Waters wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 July 2009 16:53:52 Linux Addict wrote:
> >
> > I tried using transport maps, "example.com :[smtp1.example.com]"
> > and " example.com smtp:[smtp1.example.com], but of them didn'
www.charite.de
> >
> >
> >
> > I just tried, Its NOT using MX records of smtp.example.com. I can
> > manipulate it thru DNS, but will more comfortable if we can do it
> > through Postfix.
> >
> >
> >
> What about pl
Linux Addict wrote:
Simon, I already tried that. Its not doing MX lookup I guess.
Maybe it works but you're using your local DNS which doesn't know MX
record for that remote domain you want to relay your messages through.
Try locally run dig domainname.com MX and see the result. If it's empty
I tried digging, I get the MX servers on the ANSWER section. I manage DNS as
well, so I know its resolving correctly.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
> Linux Addict wrote:
>
>>
>> Simon, I already tried that. Its not doing MX lookup I guess.
>>
>> Maybe it works but yo
Linux Addict wrote:
I tried digging, I get the MX servers on the ANSWER section. I manage
DNS as well, so I know its resolving correctly.
What is in the log files then when you're trying to relay your messages ?
Regards,
Jarek
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
> Linux Addict wrote:
>
>> I tried digging, I get the MX servers on the ANSWER section. I manage DNS
>> as well, so I know its resolving correctly.
>>
> What is in the log files then when you're trying to relay your messages ?
>
> Regards,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
>
>> Linux Addict wrote:
>>
>>> I tried digging, I get the MX servers on the ANSWER section. I manage DNS
>>> as well, so I know its resolving correctly.
>>>
>> What is in the log
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:21 -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
> I tried digging, I get the MX servers on the ANSWER section. I manage
> DNS as well, so I know its resolving correctly.
Just one thing Sir and a shot in the water. Restart Postfix (not
reload). I was having a problem where it kept looking up
Now that the slow transport (for yahoo) is at least set up correctly, I am
wondering how to verify that is actually working. I have
-o syslog_name=postfix-slow
defined for the slow transport in master.cf, but am perhaps not clear on
what this should be doing; I see no mention of postfix-slow
hi all
i understand i can transport an email id in the transport map; so i can put:
a...@example.com smtp:[192.168.0.1]
example.com smtp:[192.168.0.12]
my doubt :
with the above all mails to example.com will go to 192.168.0.12; will it
include a...@example.com? or that particular mail
I would like to reduce the mysql transport retry time (or perhaps the
proxymap retry time?), is there a variable that I can tweak down to
reduce the time between retries of mysql transport connection losses?
I'm using mysql for transport_maps and virtual_mailbox_maps.
transport
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:03:56 +0200, Jack Knowlton
wrote:
Is it possible to have a transport map with a regular expression? What I
want is to use an external relay server for all the emails to be
delivered
on Yahoo domains (eg, yahoo.com, yahoo.co.uk, yahoo.es, ecc).
If it is possible
On 11/10/2009 2:23 AM, Marc Silver wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:03:56 +0200, Jack Knowlton
wrote:
Is it possible to have a transport map with a regular expression? What I
want is to use an external relay server for all the emails to be
delivered
on Yahoo domains (eg, yahoo.com
]/ smtp4:
/^[x-z0-9]/ smtp5:
endif
Alternatively you can also use a transport randomizer script which is as
below
#!/usr/bin/perl
my $port = 2525;
my $max_servers = 100;
my $spooldir = "/tmp";
my $user = "nobody";
my $group = "nogroup";
my $background = "1&quo
On 11/11/2009 2:53 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:
Hello,
When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error:
postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/transport.db: duplicate entry:
"example.com <http://example.com>"
example.com <http://example.com> smtp:[10.2.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:53:05PM -0800, Cameron Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error:
> postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/transport.db: duplicate entry: "example.com"
>
>
> example.com smtp:[10.2.4.7]
mailserver.
What do I need to change?
Thanks,
Cameron
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/11/2009 2:53 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error:
>> postmap: warning: /etc/postfix
On 11/11/2009 3:03 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:
I have a mail server on my lan and I want it to route mail sent from it
through my mail gateway. It was working with smtp and mail headers were
showing that route.
Then I tried to move to smtps and I can send but the mail is no longer
routing to the ga
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/11/2009 3:03 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:
>
>> I have a mail server on my lan and I want it to route mail sent from it
>> through my mail gateway. It was working with smtp and mail headers were
>> showing that route.
>>
>> Then I tried to mov
My original issue is still existing in that mail is no longer routing
through my mail gateway but is being sent directly from the mail server.
Any pointers in how to trouble shoot this?
transport maps:
http://www.postfix.org/transport.5.html ,
http://www.nooblet.org/blog/2007/postfix
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> My original issue is still existing in that mail is no longer routing
>> through my mail gateway but is being sent directly from the mail server.
>>
>>
>> Any pointers in how to trouble shoot this?
&
Hi,
I'm going to be migrating users onto new back end servers and so need to
enable per user transports.
I know I need to change my mysql_transport_maps.cf query from this:
query = SELECT transport FROM domains WHERE DomainName='%s'
to something like:
query = SELECT transport FRO
is possible or if there is anything like this:
> transport_maps.cf *.* 10.25.x.x !test !test.cu 10.25.x.x I don't
> know if this is actually functional in postfix. in this case I would
> like to have a transport for all mail except the ones with the
> destination domain.ca. I
elay all mail except for domain .ca I was wondering if
> > something like this is possible or if there is anything like this:
> > transport_maps.cf *.* 10.25.x.x !test !test.cu 10.25.x.x I don't
> > know if this is actually functional in postfix. in this case I would
>
1 - 100 of 1085 matches
Mail list logo
