Hi all,
out of idle curiosity, does anybody have some info on what can be
found in the PE kinkage block?
(i.e. when you do TRAP²3, D0=
on return A1 points to the linkage block.
I have some info here:
some info on the PE linkage block:
offsets to A1:
$34 .w = mouse acceleration (10 complement!
On 18 Nov 2001, at 12:05, Christopher Cave wrote:
> Help please. I have just had parts of my QXL.WIN file
> overwritten rather mysteriously. Fortunately, I have been
> backing up my current project ever hour or so but I would like
> to recover what I can using Wined. I used to have a
> descri
On 15 Nov 2001, at 8:31, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Wolfgang, once you are happy with the LINE_A extension, is there any
> chance you'd release it - it sounds like an extension lots of people
> would like to use for graphics.
>
>
Sure, it(ll just take some time until I find some v lues that don'
On 13 Nov 2001, at 9:20, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
>(Unfortunately the
> LINE_A command Wolfgang made for me, has a huge problem when it comes to
> outer edges of windows and crashes hopelesly :-(
>
Well, you COULD tell me, so that I can check that!! Try making
the lines one less than the wi
On 12 Nov 2001, at 8:13, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
> >Is your middle name Hillary?
>
> What's that supposed to mean (I really didn't get the joke... of course
> I'm not the brightest one in the pack you know :-)
No, no, nothing to do with HR Clinton.
When Sir E. Hillary was asked why he want
On 11 Nov 2001, at 16:06, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
> At 08:07 ìì 11/11/2001 +0100, you wrote:
> >Why ever would you want to do that?
>
> First of all because it's possible :-)
Is your middle name Hillary?
> Second of all because many of the commands are imperative to what I am
> trying to
On 11 Nov 2001, at 16:04, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
> 1. I remember Marcel saying something about the x87 code being added and
> there might be an incompatibility with my AMD
Hmm, I use it with 3 amds (2 athlons, 1 K6) and no problem.
> 2. The other one is maybe the DirectX in conjunction with
On 9 Nov 2001, at 9:29, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
> Hello again and thanks for everyone that responded to my previous question.
> The question now is:
> Is it possible to place the text cursor ABSOLUTELY according to a given
> window or the screen (that is without using @#!@$~~!@## SCALE)
>
On 9 Nov 2001, at 12:06, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
> Yes but as I said again for the above (and the below) CURSOR is useless due
> to the problems with SCALE on non 2:1 screens, In effect you print in East
> and it ends up West :-)
If you just want to positiojn the cursor at a given (pixel coord
On 9 Nov 2001, at 10:12, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
> Good :-) Then half the work I thought was needed is done :-)
> I am still though continuing my quest to get a 100% definite answer on the
> modes of the QPC/QXL/Aurora/Q40 and how colours are coded on the screen
> memory. That is if they use t
On 25 Oct 2001, at 9:25, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> No moose is good moose !
Not iof you're a monty python fan..
> PS. Wolfgang, check out your computer's time - it shows Saturday October
> 25th 1997 !
Yeah, right, thanks
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 25 Oct 2001, at 20:38, Bill Waugh wrote:
> After selling hand over fist for the last year "The Hound of the
> Vaskavilles"(sp?) we now bring you Super Hound of the Vaskavilles, more
> clues, more pages, bigger and better fonts, 3,9765^7 different endings,
> start from any address in Baker Str
On 25 Oct 2001, at 8:18, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Norwegian humour at work here I suspect!
>
But no moose?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 17 Oct 2001, at 20:07, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> Also, do not forget that the first microdrives were intended to be only
> the start of a whole range of innovative new ways for mass storage.
> Clive subsequently 'lost' a lot of his 'millions' investing in plant and
> research to produce new devi
On 16 Oct 2001, at 0:58, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> At 08:09 ìì 15/10/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >Does anybody know of any toolkit having commands that support both
> >absolute coordinates AND GD2? T(snip)
Just wahjt are you trying to accomplish? I could, maybe, wxrite a
small keyword to do it.
On 16 Oct 2001, at 22:23, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> In English 'objects' or artefacts are seen as being neutral, or
> inanimate. However, most English people do attach a gender to objects
> ... like cars = the 'old girl'. Yet, I guess the QL is a masculine
> object to most users ?
To most non-use
On 16 Oct 2001, at 17:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Glad its not feminine, "Die QL" sounds a bit rash in english!
>
>It's already happened, anyway.
Wolfgang
(runs to shelter)
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 16 Oct 2001, at 21:27, Tony Firshman wrote:
> They changed to the crummy one that goes brittle probably to save 20p.
>Yup, that's the typical QL story - do it el cheapo!
wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 16 Oct 2001, at 9:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It might. If you could get it featured in the next Bond film. Perhaps
> with a machine gun in the front, a couple of missile launchers on the
> sides and a rocket booster on the back :)
>
And a QL on the board!
(phew, back on topic!)
wolf
On 16 Oct 2001, at 8:50, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> "Das QL"? I'd say it's masculine.
>
Not in my ususal mode of address:
Das Sch... *+=8% QL Dings, da
wolfgang
(hey, after thhat much dutch, we're entitled to some german...)
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 16 Oct 2001, at 5:06, Arnould Nazarian wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> : I got SMSs from Jochen on the day, so am glad to report he was well
> : enough to do that from his sick bed.
> :
> : The show was very good for both Roy and I
On 15 Oct 2001, at 9:02, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>Additionally, If someone is kind
> enough (Wolfgang?) I would like the accented characters position so I can
> make a couple versions of the fonts to accomodate your needs with the
> characters in the right positions (IIRC) I don't think that TRA
On 15 Oct 2001, at 17:46, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> Is the QL masculine or feminine in gender ?
>
> --
> Malcolm Cadman
>
For us Germans, of course, it's a neutrum...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 15 Oct 2001, at 10:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wonder does Clive Sinclair still know we exist, ie. QUANTA, and QL users
> in general?
I can't image he cares.0...
BTW, why is this thread called QPC?...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 10 Oct 2001, at 12:24, Timothy Swenson wrote:
> I do think the weakness in the QL world has always been the hardware. It's
> easy to copy software and keep it around for many years. Hardware is
> eventually going to break.
Let's not forget the drivers for the hardware... The QL world isn
On 10 Oct 2001, at 22:13, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> Anyway x86 assembler is something nobody wants to program really,
> especially when coming from the 68k corner, believe me.
>
>
It sure isn't! Segments - B
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 4 Oct 2001, at 18:56, Tarquin Mills wrote:
> The options I can see are:
> 1. Csize.
> 2. use different colours (like lynx).
> 3. do nothing and wait for Wman to change, or the Prowess licence to change.
> 4. use Prowess (i.e. use a second hand commercial version).
> 5. Write my own font so
On 4 Oct 2001, at 18:22, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> >That is very kind of you. But now I know there are some in Dilwyn's
> ProWesS
> >font(s) Collection, I 'll buy his CDrom at the next QL-meeting in
> Eindhoven
> >in November(if it is available,of course).
> >Thanks anyway for the help.
>
> Phoebus
On 3 Oct 2001, at 12:36, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> In some of the fonts I converted for Dilwyn for the Prowess Font Collection
> DO have the Euro Symbol. Apart from that if you want a Specific font (say
> Arial or similar from Windows) to maintain cross platform look, I could
> prepare for you.
Hi all,
Does anybody know of any Prowess font that have th euro symbol?
If not, is there a font editor around?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 25 Sep 2001, at 17:01, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
> Because, smart Tony perform on-the-fly compilation of SB program, or rather
> the tokenisation of the program has already been done at load/edit time,
> So, it's just like the SB is already compiled. (no need to check the syntax
> all the time).
On 21 Sep 2001, at 7:28, Ian Pizer wrote:
> QPC2: I hate to raise another problem but it is restricting when flp1_
> cannot be read
> (no medium) which means I cannot transfer from AURORA to QPC2 with a
> floppy.
can you format a floppy under QPC?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 13 Sep 2001, at 22:28, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> I wonder what this instruction is as none of the beta-testers had
> reported any crash so far...
I thought you were gone for a long time, so didn't send you this
info already. The "offending" instruction is:
INIT_SCHD MOVE.B#1,$FF10
On 12 Sep 2001, at 21:56, Tony Firshman wrote:
> ... and from someone very well known in the QL field.
>
Well who was it, then?
I don't think I got your email.
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 12 Sep 2001, at 20:50, Peter Graf wrote:
> Just in case you refer to the MOVEP instruction:
No, it's the instruction that disables external interrupts.
> The 68060 has no MOVEP. Just read the docs on your support disks, and use
> the MOVEP-emulation software. All the crashes you reported
Hi all,
I've recently had some time to play around with my all new Q60.
I'm very happy with it, it is a nifty beast.
This also gave me the opportunity to test the CD driver. Indeed, I (of
course) waznted to get my usual setup also going on the Q60. Sp I
copied my QPC QXL.WIN fimle to a CD (i'
On 5 Sep 2001, at 8:04, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> I've recently tried out a few CD-R burning programs. Although many
> Windows programs like Nero have the facility to burn raw images, some
> use various filename extensions, so an image created for one may not
> necessarily show up in the files lists
Thanks to Peter & Claus for their fast answer.
So it has to be a raw image.
I presume there is no way to burn that under Windows, unless
anybody knows better?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
Hi all,
Despite my attempts, Echelon didn't get me (yet?).
Has anybody tried to use Thierry's CDRom driver?
More specifically, has anybody got it to work with a QXL.WIN file?
I've got a Q60 now, and it would be SO nice to use a CDRom with
a disk image to get everything to the Q60.
So far, I ha
On 6 Aug 2001, at 21:41, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> Even these emails are being monitored ...
>
So why don(t we all adopt the follwoing byline:
Death, terrorists, kill the president, bomb, hoist, FBI
(Let's give echelon something to think about)
Wolfgang
PS I'll be away till september.
---
On 1 Aug 2001, at 15:58, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> All the more reason to email etc from QDOS or SMSQ/E I suppose, as
> we're (almost) completely virus proof (ask Geoff Wicks about the
> "almost" in relation to his QXL).
??? A tale worth telling?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 31 Jul 2001, at 12:33, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> Aehm.. can't help not to mention that all of this has been implemented
> OpenSource more than 15 years ago and worked perfectly until Bill's
> (not any on this list) blessings reached us.
> Kit's software is relatively moderate yet, I have seen
On 25 Jul 2001, at 15:18, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> I have to do this for all those 'Nigerian Scam' emails I'm getting these
> days :o(
>
The astonishing thing is the number of people that seem to have
fallen for that. Pure greed!
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 18 Jul 2001, at 17:42, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
> >>> In fact I have heard it before, namely in the demo version of
> >> QPC2: When you try to save a file (writing to media has been
> >> disabled in the demo) you get a "buzz" in
On 18 Jul 2001, at 17:42, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> > That shouldn't be your problem here.
>
> No, that's exactly what it is. If a disc write fails for whatever
> reason it can't give back any errors because the write call has
> already returned to the application. Therefore the sound.
But the pr
On 18 Jul 2001, at 14:37, P Witte wrote:
> In fact I have
> > heard it before, namely in the demo version of QPC2: When you try to
> > save a file (writing to media has been disabled in the demo) you get
> > a "buzz" instead.
Ummm, if I remember correctly, yhis was due tothe QPC demo version n
On 12 Jul 2001, at 19:28, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> WIN_REMV 2 - declares 'WIN2_' to be removeable
>
> or WIN_REMV 2,1
>
> WIN_REMV 2,0 - 'WIN_2' is no longer removeable !
>
>
> I haven't tried the latter information about Removeables, myself.
> Perhaps someone has ?
Actually, I someytimes use
On 3 Jul 2001, at 13:44, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> I am not receiving ANY messages or are we all quiet?
>
No, wer're just blacklisting you ... :-)))
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 30 Jun 2001, at 13:33, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> QPC v2.03 together with SMSQ/E v2.99 is now available from the usual
> places.
Ins't this great service?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 13 Jun 2001, at 11:45, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
> I've just done it and this version ofCol_obj is O.K.
> Thanks
> François Van Emelen
Phew
Wolfgang
On 11 Jun 2001, at 22:42, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It crashes with the usual qlib message window:
> Job xx Col line 510 Q_LIB error 18
> Array not DIMned
> Data :512 1384 1 Stack:5000 852
>
> 'xx' = Job number.
>
> Thanks for that fine utility.
I think I corrected that mistake som
On 11 Jun 2001, at 15:02, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
> COL_obj works fine (even in mode 4) if you avoid pressing R,G,B (for red,
> green, blue).
Errm, why? What happens then?
Wolfgang
On 10 Jun 2001, at 21:23, Peter Graf wrote:
> BTW if you want to run a QDOS application while using Linux on a Q60, you
> can use a special version of UQLX. Unlike emulators on a PC it can run QDOS
> programs native on the 68060, which is of course a lot faster.
>
Does that run QDOS classic or
On 9 Jun 2001, at 21:00, Peter Graf wrote:
> Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
>
> >Well, to put some oil on the fire (...) what is the ENORMOUS
> >advantage QPC has over the Q60?
> >
> >
> >You can buy it.
> >
> >(Sorry Peter, I couldn't resits that
On 8 Jun 2001, at 17:04, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Once soql is complete, I daresay we can banish OE and other 2 letter
> words from this list.
Even... QL ?
Wolfgang
On 7 Jun 2001, at 23:26, Bojan Kotur wrote:
> This mailing list is all great and everything but wouldn't it be
> better (and making less net traffic) if the list master just set
> up a bulletin board like UBB or similar? That way we could
> avoid having to recieve tons of mail every day and still
On 8 Jun 2001, at 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just imagine: booting 10 seconds, dialing in and getting your emails.
> Easier than walking to your mail-box. I am tired of booting Linux.
I had a dream...
Wolfgang
On 29 May 2001, at 21:42, Darren Branagh wrote:
>You said it !! Tony Firshman always says I get bigger
>each time he sees me.
Perhaps Tony is shrinking
Wolfgang
On 29 May 2001, at 14:55, DARREN BRANAGH 6798433 wrote:
> Having never been to a NA Show before, I am unsure of quantities of items to
> bring along - and with severe weight restrictions on my flight, my usual
> enormous flight suitcase is definitely out this time :-)
Umm, time to go on a die
On 24 May 2001, at 18:23, Geoff Wicks wrote:
( explanation about a Mr Evans.)
Alright, thanks, must have been quite a sight.
Don't politicians expect that sort of thing? Didn't Billy Boy Gates
also get creamed once in Belgium? Did it ever happen to clive
sinclair ?( ha, back OT).
On 23 May 2001, at 8:37, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> The ironic thing is that this incident seems to have ENHANCED John
> Prescott's reputation as a straight-talking no-nonsense down to earth
> politician. The sad part of it all was that everyone concentrated on
> Prescott and Evans, and little mention
On 17 May 2001, at 13:31, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> the problem is a bit more than simply QPC x86 code against m68k.
> SMSQ is written in 68000 assembly and even rewriting it to make
> use of 68020-60 arithmetic would be a major task, not to mention
> the lack of suitable assembler for it.
> So
On 14 May 2001, at 8:35, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Isn't that frogs ?
Toads, frogs, snails - however slow it is, it gets eaten.
Wolfgang
(ok, perhaps not toads)...
On 12 May 2001, at 21:41, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> I can confirm this as I just acquired a Q60 from Peter
Hey, this is favoritism - can I buy one, too?
Wolfgang
On 11 May 2001, at 8:17, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> PS. I've heard of Chicken Supreme but never Toad Supreme :o) :o)
>That's because your not french - here, we eat them...
Wolfgang
On 11 May 2001, at 23:06, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> Anyone know of a way to print characters on the screen without the
> character's paper affecting the channel / background?
Use OVER#channel,0
Wolfgang
On 8 May 2001, at 7:52, Timothy Swenson wrote:
> I did a quick Yahoo search on Metacomco and it looks like they are no longer
> in business. So, if the copyright holder is not around to enforce the
> copyright, making the ROM's available for free is probably a low risk venture.
>
Unless the cop
On 7 May 2001, at 21:24, Tony Firshman wrote:
> You could try copy ser2 (or ser1) but at a slow baud rate to
> avoid problems. When we first developed QL Terminal (in 1988) we found
> 2400 was the maximum safe rate, and even then sometimes chrs were lost.
> The main problem was input to QL.
D
On 30 Apr 2001, at 8:45, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> I can't believe I've been away all weekend, and when I come back to work, no
> messages on this list ?
>
Never fear, Wolfgang's here
(ahem)
Wolfgang
On 25 Apr 2001, at 21:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It's a patch (Basic program) for SMSQ/E 2.98, you can get it from
> q40.de/os.html .
>
Thanks a lot, I'm getting this now!
Wolfgang
On 23 Apr 2001, at 20:52, Duncan Neithercut wrote:
>
> Hi
> Richard Zidlicky made a patch for MMU and Qlib problems for SMSQ/E 2.98 on
> Q40.
Oh goody, where can one get the patched QLIB then Or is it
the Q40 OS that was patched?
Wolfgang
On 18 Apr 2001, at 9:11, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Granite is good for RADON gas - many homes and buildings have radon
> detectors in the basements to stop the inhabitants being radio-actively
> cooked !
I'll take the dog poo any time!
Wolfgang
On 17 Apr 2001, at 8:41, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Well, I was in Paris for 5 days.
> What can I say - it was grey, dull, wet, rainy and the streets are paved
> with dog sh*t !
Well I was in London for 5 days. What can I say? it was dull, grey
etc...
but NO Dogshit.
Phew!
Wolfgang
On 1 Apr 2001, at 20:22, Geoff Wicks wrote:
> Most of the (PD) PC translation programs I have seen are not much more
> sophisticated than this, and I remain pretty cynical of all translation
> software.
I can't really say that that kind of software gives a bad translation...
because that woul
On 30 Mar 2001, at 20:41, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> To view the screen captured you need to get the screen base number with
> SCR_BASE function in SMSQ, so PRINT SCR_BASE. On a P1 PC with a 640 x
> 480 display with 256 colours this gives me 557360.
>
> So lbytes win1_images_screen1_scr,557360 : P
On 29 Mar 2001, at 13:27, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> What to do to avoid a phantom :
>
> 1. Compile with windows copied.
> 2. Open #0 or #1 before calling scr_xlim/scr_ylim
>
> I suspect therefore that scr_xlim/scr_ylim look for channel #0 first and if
> found use it.
> If #0 not found, then try #
On 28 Mar 2001, at 23:11, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
> Well, I really can't tell. I'm not a programmer; my skills are unfortunately
> limited to some Sbasic.
> What I know about SCR_LIM and SCR_YLIM is this:
> If launch the procedure below in QD with F10 (Sbas/QD thing), you will see a
> black wi
On 24 Mar 2001, at 11:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You may be right that you cannot trust Windoze or some of its programs.
> But what is a "trusted" SMSQ/E browser worth, if the data flows on the
> basis of QPC and the underlying "untrusted" M$ Windoze?
1 - I trust QOC
2 - I trust Windows, at
On 23 Mar 2001, at 17:00, ZN wrote:
>
> Well, I was told that code and data accesses should actually ignore the top
> three bits (29, 30, 31). In other words, any combination of bits 29, 30,
> 31, should effectively act as if those bits are 000.
> Please someone tell me that's how it's supposed t
On 23 Mar 2001, at 19:57, Mills wrote:
> Please could you tell me why you want the source code?
Sure, it'll be a bit longwinded, though.
Most people on this list have access to a PC, are another machine
(UnixBox) which already has Intrernet progs, else they wouldn't be
on this list. I, for m
On 22 Mar 2001, at 16:46, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> I though you're speaking of data accesses.
>
The problem, as I'e encountered it, is as follows: You start a
QLiberated job. It hangs. Then you look at it with Jmon. You notice
that it hangs in an infinite loop, at some instrcution which says:
On 20 Mar 2001, at 22:20, Peter Graf wrote:
> 128 MB RAM / 60 GB for example. But it wouldn't make sense.
And let us pray that it never will
Wolfgang
On 20 Mar 2001, at 19:48, Geoff Wicks wrote:
> I have not come across this problem in practice, but is it something which
> only affects older (or badly written) QL-Liberated programs? Could it be
> something to do with the original basic? For example assuming that system
> variables begin at 16
On 20 Mar 2001, at 19:00, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> That's right but shouldn't pose a problem to QPC.
>
> Marcel
Oh, but it does: a jmp then give a wrong address error.
Wolfgang
On 20 Mar 2001, at 18:31, Mills wrote:
> Dear QLers
> Would people be prepared to pay for HB and if so how much, or would
> you only use it if was freeware? Would it need certain features before
> you would be prepared to buy it? As CSS1/CSS2/XSL are unlikely to be
> implemented, does this
On 19 Mar 2001, at 0:30, Q Branch wrote:
> On another tack it seems I was wasting my time looking for faults with Q
> 40 with regards to some of the problems with QLiberated programs. The
> same problems can occur on QPC 2 so the fault must lie somewhere in the
> colour drivers themselves. Now a
On 17 Mar 2001, at 5:35, Ian Pizer wrote:
> re Text87 problem: You asked a good question. I had set High Colour but if
> I set QL Colour
> the problem is solved! What does that mean?
>
IIRC, text 87 writes directly to the screen. Since the screen layout,
when using high colour mode, is totally
On 13 Mar 2001, at 19:09, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
> I'm using Smsqe 2.98 with Qpc2 high colours (always on top and window
> mode) on windows 98.
> I tried it in JOB 0 and Sbasic job with and without New after Qsave
> ram1_p.
> I added a line (line 15) to verify :
> 10 DEFine a(b,c%)
> 15 beep 1
On 13 Mar 2001, at 16:21, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> The (in)famous cloaking device then ?
Yup!
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 18:33, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>
> I suppose if Phoebus is the Klingon, suppose I'm the Romulan (from the
> problems I've caused him).
>
Oh good, can I be a Vulcan?
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 17:13, Dave Westbury wrote:
>
>
> Sorry Marcel, just tried the QPC2 demo and it does, viz:
>
Ah, it also happens on the QXL with SMSQe v. 2.98
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 16:20, Dave Westbury wrote:
> On the topic of a QL web browser, with so many going over to QPC2 ;-( , isn't it
> only going to be Q40/60, GF and maybe SGC+SuperHermes users that would have any
> real interest? I could understand the interest in a mail program using Jon's
> TCP/
On 13 Mar 2001, at 16:52, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> I guess even QLingons :-)
>
> The QLingons just uncloaked Captain !
>
>
That's a nice one! :-))
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 15:58, Dave Westbury wrote:
> Wolfgang wrote:
> It only appears to happen for me to daughter SBASIC's, the main SBASIC accepts
> it.
I haven't tried that, I generally only work with daughterjobs.
> I had a problem similar to this a few years ago when writing a very large SBAS
On 13 Mar 2001, at 19:11, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
> No problems here with Windows 98.
Here I use QPC2 under win 98 SE. (or QXL). Both have this
problem.
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 10:46, FrançoisVan Emelen wrote:
> No, can't repeat that.
Ok, good.
Thanks for answering.
Could you tell me what version of smsqe you're using?
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 16:03, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Cloaking ???
> Please explain to a thick Jock !!
Surely it means his website is run by Klingons
(using a QL of, course, to stay on topic).
Wolfgang
On 13 Mar 2001, at 8:44, Christopher Cave wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <3AADD745.29568.3C11E@localhost>
> Wolfgang
>
> Yes but, as your message implied, it was just the SBASIC job that crashed.
> The rest of the system appeared to carry on O.K.
Oh yes, the rest of the system carries on OK.
Thanks f
Hello all
I seemto have a curious problem is SMSQE Sbasic:
Writing out the following lines:
10 def proc a(b,c%)
20 end def a
and then:
Qsave ram1_p
followed by QLrun ram1_p
crashes the copy of the basic interpreter.
Can anyone repeat this?
Wolfgang
On 11 Mar 2001, at 20:23, Geoff Wicks wrote:
(snip)
> In the 1992 election this program predicted the final result more accurately
> than the BBC and ITV computers. Almost certainly a fluke, but nice to boast
> about.
Some of us, of course, have always thought that a QL beats a BBC
every day...
101 - 200 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
