Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68641 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68641/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
[`3378b5e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87932854
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -428,43 +428,47 @@ object FoldablePropagation exten
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87932789
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/group-by.sql.out ---
@@ -131,3 +131,11 @@ FROM testData
struct
-- !query 13 output
-0
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87932636
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FoldablePropagationSuite.scala
---
@@ -118,14 +118,30 @@ class FoldablePropa
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87932525
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -428,43 +428,47 @@ object FoldablePropagation exte
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87932494
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -428,43 +428,47 @@ object FoldablePropagation exten
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15279
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68646/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15279
**[Test build #68646 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68646/consoleFull)**
for PR 15279 at commit
[`c566a5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15279
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15279
**[Test build #68646 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68646/consoleFull)**
for PR 15279 at commit
[`c566a5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15279
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15279
Can you please change the title to have: "SPARK-12347" -> "[SPARK-12347]"?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
+1 on the postgres approach
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Ok we need to make a decision here, to follow hive and give a warning
message, or to follow postgres and cast string to the type of the other side.
Personally I prefer the postgres way, I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
**[Test build #68645 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68645/consoleFull)**
for PR 15880 at commit
[`1506d40`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r87929682
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/CountMinSketchAgg.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/*
+ * L
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87906133
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -31,13 +31,9 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
/**
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87906309
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -46,21 +42,23 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
@Since("
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87844941
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -106,22 +123,24 @@ private[ml] abstract class LSHModel[T <: LSHModel[T]]
*
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r87929562
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/CountMinSketchAgg.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/*
+ * Licens
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87906709
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -46,21 +42,23 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
@Since("
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87878252
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +103,7 @@ class MinHashModel private[ml] (
*/
@Experiment
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87908012
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -125,11 +125,11 @@ class MinHash(override val uid: String) extends
LSH[Min
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87922281
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -179,16 +211,13 @@ private[ml] abstract class LSHModel[T <: LSHModel[T]]
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87874869
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -66,10 +66,10 @@ private[ml] abstract class LSHModel[T <: LSHModel[T]]
self:
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87904353
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSHSuite.scala ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.ml.util.DefaultReadWriteTest
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87875688
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -46,21 +42,23 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
@Since("
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87928721
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/BucketedRandomProjectionLSH.scala
---
@@ -89,23 +90,25 @@ class RandomProjectionModel private[ml]
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87876322
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +103,7 @@ class MinHashModel private[ml] (
*/
@Experiment
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87871105
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -106,22 +106,24 @@ private[ml] abstract class LSHModel[T <: LSHModel[T]]
*
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87874663
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -35,26 +35,26 @@ private[ml] trait LSHParams extends HasInputCol with
HasOutputCol
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87910679
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -74,9 +72,12 @@ class MinHashModel private[ml] (
}
@Sin
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87875995
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -74,9 +72,12 @@ class MinHashModel private[ml] (
}
@Sin
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r87844308
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -144,12 +152,12 @@ class MinHash(override val uid: String) extends
LSH[Min
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
**[Test build #68644 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68644/consoleFull)**
for PR 15852 at commit
[`24e3617`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r87928329
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/CountMinSketchAgg.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/*
+ * Licens
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15885
**[Test build #68643 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68643/consoleFull)**
for PR 15885 at commit
[`337ef01`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15885
@marmbrus @rxin Can you take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15885
[SPARK-18440][Structured Streaming] Pass correct query execution to
FileFormatWriter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-18012 refactored the file write path in FileStre
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68638/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68638 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68638/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
[`d753d80`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
I am merging this to master and 2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68637/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #68637 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68637/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
[`87d8618`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884
**[Test build #68642 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68642/consoleFull)**
for PR 15884 at commit
[`30eff08`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883#discussion_r87924839
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -395,46 +396,56 @@ test_that("spark.mlp", {
model2 <- read.ml(modelPath)
summary2 <-
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884
[WIP][SPARK-18433][SQL] Improve DataSource option keys to be more
case-insensitive
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to improve DataSource option keys
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883#discussion_r87923954
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -896,9 +898,10 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"LogisticRegressionModel"),
#' summary(savedModel)
#
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883#discussion_r87923913
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -896,9 +898,10 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"LogisticRegressionModel"),
#' summary(savedModel)
#
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883#discussion_r87923822
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -896,9 +898,10 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"LogisticRegressionModel"),
#' summary(savedModel)
#
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
@gatorsmile , I addressed all comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68641 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68641/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
[`3378b5e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68639/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
**[Test build #68639 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68639/consoleFull)**
for PR 15852 at commit
[`efa7022`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15878
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15878
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68636/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15878
**[Test build #68636 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68636/consoleFull)**
for PR 15878 at commit
[`918aa25`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Thank you, @hvanhovell !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
LGTM - pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #68640 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68640/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
[`fab5682`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Thank you, @gatorsmile ! I'll update this soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
Can you please add "[ML]" to the PR title?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15817
Can you please add "[ML]" to the PR description? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868#discussion_r87915156
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -667,7 +667,14 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Loggi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87914133
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ partitionSpec
;
part
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868#discussion_r87913599
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -667,7 +667,14 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Loggi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68635/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
**[Test build #68635 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68635/consoleFull)**
for PR 15682 at commit
[`fef9981`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68634 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68634/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
[`93916b1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
`numPartitions` might be not a good name for this purpose. How about
`maxConnections`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87910722
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,58 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionComman
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87910682
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -215,8 +215,14 @@ case class DataSourceAn
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868#discussion_r87910285
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -667,7 +667,14 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Loggi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Thank you for review, again. I'll fix them soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868#discussion_r87909790
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCOptions.scala
---
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ class JDBCOptions(
}
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14720#discussion_r87908473
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -856,6 +856,17 @@ class HiveQuerySuite extends HiveComparis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
**[Test build #68639 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68639/consoleFull)**
for PR 15852 at commit
[`efa7022`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68633/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68638 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68638/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
[`d753d80`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #68633 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68633/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
[`3c06aa6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68630/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68629/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68630 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68630/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
[`c926012`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
**[Test build #68629 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68629/consoleFull)**
for PR 15840 at commit
[`ec0c55c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #68637 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68637/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
[`87d8618`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Below contains a section of `Implicit Data Conversion` in Oracle:
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/sql_elements002.htm
It clearly documents the potential changes in
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68631/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #68631 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68631/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
[`87d8618`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87892226
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -215,8 +215,14 @@ case class DataSourceAnaly
101 - 200 of 437 matches
Mail list logo