On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:24:23PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
> "There can be more than one reason."
>
> Yes, but reasons 'afterwards' are always easily found (and even believed by
> themselves). It's called 'to rationalise'. The reason why it actually got
> deleted, is the reason first given in the e
"There can be more than one reason."
Yes, but reasons 'afterwards' are always easily found (and even believed by
themselves). It's called 'to rationalise'. The reason why it actually got
deleted, is the reason first given in the email, which was based on an
emotional tit-for-tat reaction, and is n
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:05:05PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
> "Saying "freenet sucks, it's gotten worse, it'll never get better", and
> implying that this is because of the people building it, is not helpful.
> Saying and implying it to newbies when we are particularly vulnerable
> due to our slow in
"Saying "freenet sucks, it's gotten worse, it'll never get better", and
implying that this is because of the people building it, is not helpful.
Saying and implying it to newbies when we are particularly vulnerable
due to our slow initial performance due to freenet taking a while to
learn where stu
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:13:32PM +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
> Yeah, I wish I had that connection to my home. I have to live with
> 256/128 cable. When I ran freenet on that it wasn't too bad, but I
> have a bandwidth cap.
I feel for you. Are you in australia/new zealand? Or is there a local
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:58:28AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
> Well, phillip, see my other post for your remarks, but I would wanna say
> specifically one thing:
>
> "* I don't like (frequently Ian)"
>
> Isn't true. I NEVER contend it's the person, as individual, that I dislike,
> I dislike the act
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:19:59PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
> My critism is related to the performance and way of development of Freenet.
> In both instances, I have given constructive suggestions too, but you deny
> that. And even this time, I said changing to UDP might help with the
> firewall issu
Jesus,
If anything gave me a bad taste in my mouth other than freenet's
terrible speed and reliablility, it's this current argument. Good luck in
the future, maybe I'll be back when this doesn't remind me of a
dysfunction family.
___
Support mailing list
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 01:58:28 +0100, Newsbyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, phillip, see my other post for your remarks, but I would wanna say
> specifically one thing:
>
> "* I don't like (frequently Ian)"
>
> Isn't true. I NEVER contend it's the person, as individual, that I dislike,
> I di
Well, phillip, see my other post for your remarks, but I would wanna say
specifically one thing:
"* I don't like (frequently Ian)"
Isn't true. I NEVER contend it's the person, as individual, that I dislike,
I dislike the actions and decisions a person takes, because it leads, and
has lead, to a
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:19:59 +0100, Newsbyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[cut for brevity]
In my time watching this list, which is well over a year now, I don't
actually recall you making a valid contribution to the project. I do
tend to read your emails, though it can be a struggle at times, and
al
"I wasn't aware that you were ever "in" the project to be kicked out of
it (whatever being "in" the project means). Very few people have
@freenetproject.org email addresses, you got one because you asked for
it and because you said it would help you raise donations for the
project."
That was one
On 1 Dec 2004, at 10:05, Newsbyte wrote:
> Now, may I ask you if you feel I have helped/supported you with my
posts? I
ask that, because I just got emailed by Ian saying he kicked me out of
the
project (well, at least he disabled my freenetproject account)
I wasn't aware that you were ever "in" t
13 matches
Mail list logo
