On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Tortise wrote:
>
> Well I had already done all that and it still didn't work, that was
> using 1.2.3 RC1 embedded. (3 NIC's, one WAN, two LAN) I now wish I had set
> up a sniffer to see if magic packets were actually going out
>
> I just upgraded to 1.2.3
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Buechler"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Wake On LAN
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Tortise wrote:
Somehow I cannot get magic packets to awaken any PC on a pfSense LAN. I
don't get it.
Some motherboard
t happens because not there is not "bgpctl show ip" command, we have to use "bgpctl
show ip bgp"
Fix for both issues:
--- openbgpd_status.php.20091211.bak2009-12-10 11:26:10.0 -0500
+++ openbgpd_status.php 2009-12-11 19:20:28.83700 -0500
@@ -140,10 +140,10
[Please try not to top post, especially when others in the thread are
not top posting]
On 12/11/2009 6:28 PM, Nathaniel Simch de Morais wrote:
> 2009/12/11 Jim Pingle mailto:li...@pingle.org>>
>
> On 12/11/2009 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Simch de Morais wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I have a p
I have this on a pfsense 1.2.2 and now i'm using 1.2.3 release! The same
problem. As i'm using in production environment i'll try to reinstall and
reconfigure from start another time. I exported a backup file from 1.2.2 and
restore on 1.2.3.
So, if anyone else could help me i apreciate.
2009/12/
On 12/11/2009 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Simch de Morais wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a problem with my pfsense and already changed my machine but the
> problem still.
>
> Well, i can make any changes in squid, but in the tab "Cache management"
> just don't save. I put all info about cache i want and when
I'm using firefox 3.5.5
2009/12/11 David Burgess
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Nathaniel Simch de Morais
> wrote:
>
> > Well, i can make any changes in squid, but in the tab "Cache management"
> > just don't save. I put all info about cache i want and when i click
> "save"
> > the scre
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Nathaniel Simch de Morais
wrote:
> Well, i can make any changes in squid, but in the tab "Cache management"
> just don't save. I put all info about cache i want and when i click "save"
> the screen returns to default.
>
> Does anyone seen this?
I get this in Chro
Hi all
I have a problem with my pfsense and already changed my machine but the
problem still.
Well, i can make any changes in squid, but in the tab "Cache management"
just don't save. I put all info about cache i want and when i click "save"
the screen returns to default.
Does anyone seen this?
t"
remote-as 65444
}
Could you please fix this?
--- openbgpd.inc.20091211.bak2009-12-10 11:26:10.0 -0500
+++ openbgpd.inc2009-12-11 17:15:09.76300 -0500
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
$used_this_item = false;
if($neighbor['groupname'] == "&qu
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Tom Müller-Kortkamp
wrote:
> Am 11.12.2009 um 01:25 schrieb Scott Ullrich:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Chris Buechler
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't believe there were any changes between RC3 and release though?
>>> It's been a while since the image size cha
apt@gmail.com schreef:
SSD woul definitely bring the power, speed & sound benefits of flash. It only
lacks the perfect recovery of a read-only root fs. A big improvement over spinning
media nevertheless.
The writes should be fine really, worst case is that it will fail to
write at some p
SSD woul definitely bring the power, speed & sound benefits of flash. It only
lacks the perfect recovery of a read-only root fs. A big improvement over
spinning media nevertheless.
Regarding reserved unused space on an SSD, Anand recently recommended 20%
reserved, and more recently stated 'the
SSD work just fine.you don't need CF and SSDwith a single SSD 2.5
ide device it get the job done perfectly...BUT!! is always that butALL
the SSD have limited life cycle even the industrial ones, yes, it's 10
million of writes...but you know some day, sooner or later is going to
I might be missing the boat here, but what about using a 2.5" SSD
instead of flash + normal HD? That way you get the benefit of solid
state, plus you have the space & performance for a regular file system
so you can run all the packages you want. Granted, SSDs aren't the
cheapest things around,
On Dec 11, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 12/11/2009 10:50 AM, David Burgess wrote:
I've been happily using 1.2.3-RC1 for many months now on a Soekris
net5501 and a 100GB 2.5" SATA drive. I like the idea of an embedded
system on a CF card, but that's not possible or advisable for me as
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Oliver Hansen wrote:
> Sorry if I'm missing it somewhere but is there a changelog between 1.2.3-RC3
> and 1.2.3-RELEASE? The notes in the blog post seem to reference anything
> that changed since 1.2.2.
Complete list of changes is here:
https://rcs.pfsense.org/pro
Chris Buechler schreef:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:31:38AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
I just did the upgrade via the web GUI..
it went down w/o a hitch...
Same thing here. One thing that was a potential problem
in the past was https.
Shou
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> Details here:
> http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=531
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>
On 12/11/2009 12:33 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
>> On 12/11/2009 12:22 PM, Paul Mansfield wrote:
>>> can you do overlay file systems on freeBSD, so that the base OS and
>>> config is read-only and you overlay a read-write file system at a very
>>>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> On 12/11/2009 12:22 PM, Paul Mansfield wrote:
>> can you do overlay file systems on freeBSD, so that the base OS and
>> config is read-only and you overlay a read-write file system at a very
>> late stage in booting IF that overlay is uncorrupt
On 12/11/2009 12:22 PM, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> can you do overlay file systems on freeBSD, so that the base OS and
> config is read-only and you overlay a read-write file system at a very
> late stage in booting IF that overlay is uncorrupted?
>
> when you've made changes to config, if the worst
On 11/12/09 15:50, David Burgess wrote:
> I've been happily using 1.2.3-RC1 for many months now on a Soekris
> net5501 and a 100GB 2.5" SATA drive. I like the idea of an embedded
> system on a CF card, but that's not possible or advisable for me as
> I'm running the squid and freeswitch packages.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Manny A. Wise wrote:
> My needs were exactly like yoursFreeSwitch and Squid...
>
> I am pretty good with hardware, but terrible with software... :(
My software background is a lot more linux than BSD, but a person can learn ;)
Some cursory investigation reve
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:31:38AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
>> I just did the upgrade via the web GUI..
>> it went down w/o a hitch...
>
> Same thing here. One thing that was a potential problem
> in the past was https.
Shouldn't be a probl
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:31:38AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> I just did the upgrade via the web GUI..
> it went down w/o a hitch...
Same thing here. One thing that was a potential problem
in the past was https. Switching to http might fix your
problems. Or, do a console install.
--
Eugen* Lei
Hello David...
This is eaxctly what I want to work on :)
I came to this list and was given only two options...
1) use nanofrebsd...
2) use regular hardrive...
I din't like either one
My needs were exactly like yoursFreeSwitch and Squid...
I am pretty good with hardware, but terrib
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
>> (cold-reset resiliency,
> The moment you have a drive mounted rw, you lose this. :-)
Well you lose it on the rw partitions, but if the core system is
mounted to RAM from a read-only filesystem, then at least the core
system has that resilienc
On 12/11/2009 10:50 AM, David Burgess wrote:
> I've been happily using 1.2.3-RC1 for many months now on a Soekris
> net5501 and a 100GB 2.5" SATA drive. I like the idea of an embedded
> system on a CF card, but that's not possible or advisable for me as
> I'm running the squid and freeswitch packag
I've been happily using 1.2.3-RC1 for many months now on a Soekris
net5501 and a 100GB 2.5" SATA drive. I like the idea of an embedded
system on a CF card, but that's not possible or advisable for me as
I'm running the squid and freeswitch packages.
I was wondering however, if it would be difficul
On 11/12/09 15:00, R. M. Molenaar wrote:
> > How did you update youir box?
> > With an update file or new full installation?
with the update file using the web ui.
> >
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Paul Mansfield [mailto:it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com]
> > Verzonden: vrijdag 11 decembe
I just did the upgrade via the web GUI..
it went down w/o a hitch...
--
J.D. Bronson
Information Technology
Aurora Health Care - Milwaukee WI
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-
How did you update youir box?
With an update file or new full installation?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Paul Mansfield [mailto:it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 december 2009 15:59
Aan: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: Re: [pfSense Support] RC3 to RELEASE - Verify
I just
I just upgraded a 1.2.1-release directly to 1.2.3-release with no
hitches at all. wasn't a particularly busy box but still relatively
important, and no complaints so far!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
On 12/11/2009 5:21 AM, bsd wrote:
> I wanted to know if It was Ok to install SquidGuard package with an embedded
> version of pfSense working on NanoBSD ?
> I plan to deploy It on Alix board… As the system is mounted RO… I am not
> certain this will be the best settings.
>
> Will this still be
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> In a nutshell, NanoBSD had many many changes up until a month or two
> ago. You will need to reflash.
Is it safe to turn NanoBSD images (e.g. the 4 GByte one) from
embedded to full install in the old way (changing /etc/platfom
fro
Hello,
I wanted to know if It was Ok to install SquidGuard package with an embedded
version of pfSense working on NanoBSD ?
I plan to deploy It on Alix board… As the system is mounted RO… I am not
certain this will be the best settings.
Will this still be ok - or do you have any other sugges
Am 11.12.2009 um 01:25 schrieb Scott Ullrich:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Chris Buechler
wrote:
I don't believe there were any changes between RC3 and release
though?
It's been a while since the image size changed.
Yes, there where a couple NanoBSD fixes. One in particular was on T
John Mitchell schreef:
No worries, thanks for your help,
I don't suppose there is any way to backup the RRD Graph data is there?
(More specifiically the Traffic portion). Trying to get a years worth of
data going ;)
Copy off the contents of /var/db/rrd
Regards,
Seth
Many many thanks for
39 matches
Mail list logo
