Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 19/07/2011 21:57, Joe32065 told the world: > What fish? I've been using SeaMonkey from the beginning, no fish for me. > http://www.amazon.com/So-Long-Thanks-All-Fish/dp/0345479963/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1311129552&sr=1-1 -- MCBastos This message has been protected

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread JeffM
>JeffM wrote: >>Hmmm. I've already used this analogy once today (elsewhere). >>Sometimes it only takes ONE individual to affect a change: >> >> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >OK, so if I dedicate my life to making sure everyone knows >that it's "Effect ch

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JeffM wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Inviting end users who are incapable of coding or testing is an empty promise. Describe more fully "incapable of testing". What I mean is that most end users can demo a program, play around for a bi

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Rufus wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JeffM wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Inviting end users who are incapable of coding or testing is an empty promise. Describe more fully "incapable of testing". What I mean is that most end users can demo a program, play around for a bit, and generall

Re: SM 2.2 not showing attachment

2011-07-19 Thread NoOp
On 07/19/2011 10:36 AM, Michael Gordon wrote: > Bill Spikowski wrote: >> chokito wrote: >>> I received an e-mail thats not show the attachment. >>> - X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 >>> - Content-Type: video/x-ms-wmv; >>> Microsoft Outlook Express shows the attachment! >> >> >> I see this b

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> John wrote: >> >>> I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email >>> account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not >>> supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not >>> SeaMonkey? >> >>

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JeffM wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Inviting end users who are incapable of coding or testing is an empty promise. Describe more fully "incapable of testing". What I mean is that most end users can demo a program, play around for a bit, and generally satisfy them

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: John wrote: I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey? Yahoo is clueless with their browser sniffer. You wil

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: The point of this discussion is that the vast majority of SeaMonkey users (other than that very small élite who do contribute) find out about feature changes far too late in the process to provide any useful input. If the developers want to know what end users think, they

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread Joe32065
What fish? I've been using SeaMonkey from the beginning, no fish for me. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread Rufus
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JeffM wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Inviting end users who are incapable of coding or testing is an empty promise. Describe more fully "incapable of testing". What I mean is that most end users can demo a program, play around for a bit, and generally satisfy them

Re: Question: How to set SM for Mail, but FF for Browser?

2011-07-19 Thread Ray_Net
chokito wrote: You must set the FF as default in FF preferences. Edit> Preferences> Mail& Newsgroups You can then select Mail, News and Feeds as default application(s) He did not ask SM to be the default for Mail News and Feeds ... He will just have FF as the default browser... I think tha

Re: Can't Enable/Disable Java using Preferences

2011-07-19 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/19/11 3:18 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 7/19/11 10:10 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote: >>> David E. Ross wrote: On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote: > Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java > through the Preferences->Advanced check

Re: Can't Enable/Disable Java using Preferences

2011-07-19 Thread Dick Hoffman
David E. Ross wrote: On 7/19/11 10:10 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote: Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java through the Preferences->Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons Manager. Not a big deal but w

Re: Can't Enable/Disable Java using Preferences

2011-07-19 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/19/11 10:10 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote: >>> Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java >>> through the Preferences->Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons >>> Manager. Not a big deal but what's the

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
JeffM wrote: Hmmm. I've already used this analogy once today (elsewhere). Sometimes it only takes ONE individual to affect a change: OK, so if I dedicate my life to making sure everyone knows that it's "Effect change," not "Affect change," I c

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread JeffM
>JeffM wrote: >>Describe more fully "incapable of testing". >> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >What I mean is that most end users can demo a program, >play around for a bit, >and generally satisfy themselves that "it works" for their favorite tasks. > That actually constitutes a lot of data points. >The

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread WLS
chokito wrote: If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey will fix it.http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ Yeas, because the user-agent will show as default both, FF and SM: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0 SeaMonkey/2.2 Only if you

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread chokito
> If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey > will fix it.http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ > Yeas, because the user-agent will show as default both, FF and SM: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0 SeaMonkey/2.2 ___

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread Chris Ilias
On 11-07-19 11:38 AM, John wrote: I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey? If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of Se

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread chokito
Show here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530786 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.2 not showing attachment

2011-07-19 Thread chokito
> Is it possible that the sender composed the message in HTML and used the > Attachment box to include the file?  Instead of placing the image file > "inline" the message body? > > Michael G The attachment file is a video.wmv. ___ support-seamonkey maili

Re: SM 2.2 not showing attachment

2011-07-19 Thread Michael Gordon
Bill Spikowski wrote: chokito wrote: I received an e-mail thats not show the attachment. - X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 - Content-Type: video/x-ms-wmv; Microsoft Outlook Express shows the attachment! I see this behavior occasionally, going back many versions. In preview mode, the

Re: SM 2.2 not showing attachment

2011-07-19 Thread chokito
The problem is a false declaration from MS in the header of the e- mail! --- MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0047_01CC3F14.67A3B6E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcvM+w1nVYbBX9dkRj +h1JJ1yJeTwwAAKdDQAAAhERAAAhNggAA

Re: SM2.1, Feeds - not able to re-subscribe after manual folder clean-up - FIXED

2011-07-19 Thread Philipp van Hüllen
Philipp van Hüllen schrieb: Hi, I had subscribed to a Feed a few days ago via the SM2.1 internal Feed reader as part of the messenger. Today, after restarting SM, I had 2 folders present, both with the same funny name extension, both without any content. I checked the subscription settings - bo

Re: Can't Enable/Disable Java using Preferences

2011-07-19 Thread Dick Hoffman
David E. Ross wrote: On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote: Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java through the Preferences->Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons Manager. Not a big deal but what's the point of the Preferences checkbox? Dick I can enable

Re: Question: How to set SM for Mail, but FF for Browser?

2011-07-19 Thread chokito
You must set the FF as default in FF preferences. Edit > Preferences > Mail & Newsgroups You can then select Mail, News and Feeds as default application(s) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/l

Question: How to set SM for Mail, but FF for Browser?

2011-07-19 Thread GrantH
I'm using the latest of both, but there are a number of things I prefer on FF to how SM's browser works. I've not been able to find (or possibly recognize) either an internal setting in SM to set FF as my browser of choice (it *is* set as my default within FF, and I have *not* set SM as my default

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
John wrote: > I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email > account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not > supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey? Yahoo is clueless with their browser sniffer. You will need to add "NOT Firefox/3.

Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread John
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey? John -- Q: What's the quickest way to get a mailbox full of spam? A: Post a message in any newsgro

Re: SM 2.2 not showing attachment

2011-07-19 Thread Bill Spikowski
chokito wrote: I received an e-mail thats not show the attachment. - X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 - Content-Type: video/x-ms-wmv; Microsoft Outlook Express shows the attachment! I see this behavior occasionally, going back many versions. In preview mode, the attachment won't be vis

SM 2.2 not showing attachment

2011-07-19 Thread chokito
I received an e-mail thats not show the attachment. - X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 - Content-Type: video/x-ms-wmv; Microsoft Outlook Express shows the attachment! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://li

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread WLS
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WLS wrote: Some good sources of information on what is going on with releases. Planet Mozilla Mozilla Wiki MozillaZine Forums in the Build sections. Tha

Re: Aktuellen Tab schließen, Paßwortmanager usw

2011-07-19 Thread GerardJan
Pommes wrote: 1. Klicken auf die Taste "aktuelles Tab schließen" erlegt seamonkey. 2. Gebe ich beim Einloggen als Name eine Emailadresse an reagiert der Paßwortmanager nicht und die Daten werden nicht abgelegt (bei gmx.de) 3. Ich vermisse beim Öffnen einer Lesezeichengruppe die Möglichkeit im neu

Aktuellen Tab schließen, Paßwortmanager usw

2011-07-19 Thread Pommes
1. Klicken auf die Taste "aktuelles Tab schließen" erlegt seamonkey. 2. Gebe ich beim Einloggen als Name eine Emailadresse an reagiert der Paßwortmanager nicht und die Daten werden nicht abgelegt (bei gmx.de) 3. Ich vermisse beim Öffnen einer Lesezeichengruppe die Möglichkeit im neuen Fenster öffne

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-19 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
JeffM wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Inviting end users who are incapable of coding or testing is an empty promise. Describe more fully "incapable of testing". What I mean is that most end users can demo a program, play around for a bit, and generally satisfy themselves that "it works" fo