Hello TBBETA,
Just curious... and this has probably been answered a thousand
times...
Is it possible to select a portion of a message, then click the
printer icon and have *just* that selected part printed?
Just tried and the whole message was printed :( I don't know if this
is a beta issue or
I am using Beta 4.1.18 on Windows XP Home.
I am experiencing a printing bug: I can print a message. Whenever I try to
print another message afterwards, the "print" job gets ignored. I first have
to shut down TB and restart it before I can print the second message.
Can anyone co
October 17, 2008
Any suggested timeline on a beta version with the printing problem
fixed. I'm using a work around now, however, a fix would be
appreciated in the near future.
Jerry
--
Ethan J. Mings
Oakville, Ontario Canada
Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running: The Bat! Version:4.0.
Hi,
I have found that if the default printer is not correct (ie it is
set up as a network printer and it is not present on the network
because you are "mobile"), an alert is presented telling you that the
printer is invalid. Even if you set the correct default printer, The
Bat! will not let you pr
Subject: Printing
From: Pete
~~
Hello Pete,
> Is it possible to select a portion of a message, then click the
> printer icon and have *just* that selected part printed?
Put %CLIPBOARD into your printer template.
Then just hig
Hello Pete.
At 9:40 AM on Saturday, January 12, 2002 you wrote the
following about [printing]
Pete> [...] A simple feature request: selecting a part
Pete> of the message and then pressing the printer icon
Pete> should result in printing the selected part, of
Pete> course. And whe
Hello Jan,
12 Jan 2002, 16:52:54, you wrote:
JR> You might consider sending your suggestion to the programmers via
JR> TB!'s main menu: Help -> Feedback -> Suggestions.
Will do that.
JR> In the meantime, I guess I would just dump a text
JR> selection to notepad & print it form there
I'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:40:21 +0200GMT (which was 15:40 +0100GMT where I live),
Pete thought about "printing" and wrote:
Nick>>> Put %CLIPBOARD into your printer template.
Nick>>> Then just highlight what you wan
ssage from the messagelist and pressed the
P>> printer icon. Instead of your message I got whatever-was-there-in-the
P>> clipboard printed :((
PM> Pete, might it be possible you forgot the copying to the clipboard?
PM> Just a thought...
Yes I did, but that was partly deliberate.
On 12 Jan 2002, 8:40:21 AM, Pete wrote:
> Replying with a selected part of a message (F4) is a breeze.
> Something like that should be possible for printing, too.
It should work for reply to all first, then to printing. Maybe they
can add both together.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box
On Monday, April 27, 2009, 9:06:42 AM, Andreas Schwartmann wrote:
> I am experiencing a printing bug: I can print a message. Whenever I
> try to print another message afterwards, the "print" job gets
> ignored. I first have to shut down TB and restart it before I can print th
Hello Dwight,
>> I am experiencing a printing bug: I can print a message. Whenever I
>> try to print another message afterwards, the "print" job gets
>> ignored. I first have to shut down TB and restart it before I can print the
>> second message.
> cann
Thanks, that should do it. :)
2009/4/27 mse
> Hello Dwight,
>
> >> I am experiencing a printing bug: I can print a message. Whenever I
> >> try to print another message afterwards, the "print" job gets
> >> ignored. I first have to shut down TB and
't find an
option to tell TB! to print the background color or image, either,
which could make the white text visible by wasting lots of ink
and/or toner.
However, if TB! doesn't support these settings, I'd like to make
a request that there is at least an option to render WHITE te
Hello Batpeople,
I'm getting a variety of AV messages when attempting to print from the
main menu or with a message open. The latest is:
"Access violation at address 74756120. Read address 74756120."
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
-
Hello Batpeople,
I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to large
type and an exorbitant number of pages (like 88 instead of 2 or 3).
Anyone else having these problems?
--
Best regards,
Richard N
Hello Jon,
Concerning 3.71.03,
Thursday, February 23, 2006, 2:47:13 PM, you wrote:
JP> I thought this was resolved earlier, but the problem seems to be back.
JP> The font becomes extremely large when printing a html message. A
JP> single page became seven pages upon printing.
Alas,
On Thursday, February 23, 2006, 9:28:32 AM, Mark Partous wrote:
MP> Hello Jon,
MP> Concerning 3.71.03,
MP> Thursday, February 23, 2006, 2:47:13 PM, you wrote:
JP>> I thought this was resolved earlier, but the problem seems to be back.
JP>> The font becomes extremely large
On Thursday, February 23, 2006, 8:28:32 AM, Mark Partous wrote:
> Alas, confirmed! (cc-d to Beta List)
confirmed, although not for plain text as well this time.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.
Hello Jon,
Thursday, February 23, 2006, 4:35:33 PM, you wrote:
JP> Thank you Mark. I filed a BT (inadvertently 3 times!!! oops.) Please
JP> support the correct one at:
JP> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5711
Due to problems (changes) with the [name]server of my provider I haven't
receive
Hello Batpeople,
V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
stamp.
Confirmation?
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
---
Using The Bat! v3.72.01 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
on a Pentium 4
Hallo The Bat!,
my personal problem concerning strange print behaviour has been
solved. Bringing the wrap setting back from 77 to 70 solved it all.
-=/ Cees /=-
http://dierhulp.nb.nu/
"Freedom means the opportunity to be what we never thought we would be."
- Daniel J(oseph) Bo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBBETA,
Has anyone else noticed that Beta/7 doesn't print in color? My v1.53o
prints in color but the new Beta/7 does not.
- --
Best regards,
Gary
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/7
Windows 98 4.10 Build A
-BEGI
am Montag, 3. November 2008 um 23:51 schrieb Ian A. White:
> Are you still having problems with this?
I fear you dont understand me.
I was not talking about having a problem.
I tried to get _you_ to send the exeptions.log anyway you can no longer
recognize an error - but maybe the problem is onl
Hello,
I do not know if this will be implemented, users asking me about this, so I
want to know, if Ritlabs plans to add HTML support to Print Setup too, as
for messages, companies want to define images and formatting to printed
documents.
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat
e
> a request that there is at least an option to render WHITE text
> as BLACK when printing.
Printout contents is governed by the print template (Message->Print
setup...->Template). There, the text is inserted with the %TEXT macro.
How this macro extracts text from and HTML mes
e
> a request that there is at least an option to render WHITE text
> as BLACK when printing.
You can change the color of printout's background manually by creating
and customizing a viewer profile in preferences->profile layout and
selecting it in print setup.
But that's
t support these settings, I'd like to make
SPV> a request that there is at least an option to render WHITE text
SPV> as BLACK when printing.
Another work around is to open it in your browser and print from there
--
Rick
Ayn Rand ranted against social programs that enabled the "parasite
ts of ink
>> and/or toner.
>> However, if TB! doesn't support these settings, I'd like to make
>> a request that there is at least an option to render WHITE text
>> as BLACK when printing.
IP> You can change the color of printout's background manually by c
into the HTML email, I think it
should print the colour exactly as in the email. (But then, I also
believe that emails should not be in white colour.)
If a "smart" printing module is introduced, please make it optional,
so I can turn it off.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez
at colour I
TF> would like better than the one coded into the HTML email, I think it
TF> should print the colour exactly as in the email. (But then, I also
TF> believe that emails should not be in white colour.)
I was just hoping for something approaching HTML printing
consistency, so that we
ware should be second-guessing what colour I
TF>> would like better than the one coded into the HTML email, I think it
TF>> should print the colour exactly as in the email. (But then, I also
TF>> believe that emails should not be in white colour.)
> I was just hoping for something a
I love the new option for Dark Mode, but...
I just tried printing a plain text email from Dark Mode
for the first time and I was surprised to find that the
entire body of the message is MISSING from the printout!
Then I realized that it was there, just printed in WHITE
just like it is shown on
I've noticed an appreciable slow down when trying to print out an
email with this latest release. Time from invoking the print command
till the print window appears is 20-25 seconds whereas in previous
versions it was 5 or less.
Anyone else notice this phenomenon?
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB!
Hello TB,
I receive messages from PayPal telling me I have received payments.
When viewing the message the URL manager pops up asking if I want to
allow the the external links. I have selected "Allow" and can now see
the extra graphics. The problem occurs when I go to print the e-mail,
these new
Guten Tag The Bat! Beta,
i wanted to print out a HTML Mail, bevor the Printer begins to work, i
had to confirm this Error:
,- [ ]
| ---
| The Bat!
| ---
| Access violation at address 12C43235 in module 'KMXL31DR.dll'. Read of
address 06EC82B
October 13, 2008
Printing certain e-mails is an important function of my work. I found
the most recent alpha, I cannot print messages to paper. However, I
did find that I can print to my pdf writer. Once I have the pdf, I
then can print the pdf to paper.
It's not the best solution, b
am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2008 um 21:24 schrieb Ian A. White:
ST>> The Bat! 4.0.34.17 (ALPHA) is available
> Printing still hasn't been fixed.
Nobody is giving some Information about this, if to test Versions in
real Enviroment you need to print out.
I will not test this V
Hello Jens,
JF> Nobody is giving some Information about this, if to test Versions in
JF> real Enviroment you need to print out.
The problem is - this bug cannot be reproduced on our printers, so we
should find a "proper" printer first.
--
Cheers!
Stefan
..."When the going gets weird, the we
> Hello Jens,
JF>> Nobody is giving some Information about this, if to test Versions in
JF>> real Enviroment you need to print out.
> The problem is - this bug cannot be reproduced on our printers, so we
> should find a "proper" printer first.
I get a blank page
am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2008 um 22:24 schrieb Stefan Tanurkov:
JF>> Nobody is giving some Information about this, if to test Versions in
JF>> real Enviroment you need to print out.
> The problem is - this bug cannot be reproduced on our printers, so we
> should find a "proper" printer first.
Hello,
printed just fine here. Used HP LJ2200dtn via network, Samsung
SCX-4500 via USB and Adobe PDF.
The Bat! 4.0.34.17 + AntiSpamSniper 3.0.1.2
Windows Vista SP1 32-bit
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Current beta is 4.0.34.17 | 'Using TBBETA
> G'day Andrew,
->> On Friday, October 31, 2008, 11:35:23 AM, you (Andrew Gurinov) wrote:
AG>> Hello,
AG>> printed just fine here. Used HP LJ2200dtn via network, Samsung
AG>> SCX-4500 via USB and Adobe PDF.
AG>> The Bat! 4.0.34.17 + AntiSpamSniper 3.0.1.2
AG>> Windows Vista SP1 32-bit
> Could t
On Thursday, October 30, 2008, 4:24:58 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
> The problem is - this bug cannot be reproduced on our printers, so we
> should find a "proper" printer first.
not sure what you mean here. you mean you need a driver which fails to
print? or what? have me confused.
--
Dwight A.
Hi Ian,
> Could this be a Vista introduced issue? Not everyone posts their OS.
Nope, got just too a blanc sheet through my HP Color Laserjet 3600, USB 2.0.
--
Regards,
Gunivortus
Using The Bat Vs. 4.0.34.16 (ALPHA) under Vista Ultimate 32 bit
__
at? have me confused.
I am running fineprint version 5.85
in
I said
> I have to revise this. I can print plain text messages. after
> reviewing
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I thought I'd try printing an HTML message. Chose the daily email with
> headlines from NewYorkTimes
am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2008 um 01:46 schrieb Ian A. White:
AG>> printed just fine here
AG>> [---%<---gekürzt---%<---]
AG>> The Bat! 4.0.34.17 + AntiSpamSniper 3.0.1.2
AG>> Windows Vista SP1 32-bit
> Could this be a Vista introduced issue? Not everyone posts their OS.
Most of us have their
am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2008 um 06:45 schrieb Gunivortus Goos:
> Your work is to discover your work and then, with all your
> heart, to give yourself to it. -- Buddha
Thank you for the wise words, i will write it down for the future ;-)
Oh, no, i will print it out before Switching to the actual
Hello Rick,
R> I also get this when printing to a PDF using CutePDF print driver
Bingo! Thank you!
--
Cheers!
Stefan
..."`Automatic' simply means that you can't repair it yourself."
- Mary H. Waldrip
__
Hallo Ian A. White,
am 31.10.2008, um 01:46 Uhr, you wrote:
IAW> Could this be a Vista introduced issue? Not everyone posts their OS.
Blank Page using Lexmark 250d (LPT) on Windows XP SP3
still no problems printing via fineprint (6.04) on the same printer!
--
Gruß Ro
am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2008 um 22:24 schrieb Stefan Tanurkov:
> The problem is - this bug cannot be reproduced on our printers, so we
> should find a "proper" printer first.
But you did change something, of course - because the Problem is
different now:
1) Kyocera FS-820 Laser Black&White o
On Friday, October 31, 2008, 16:09:11, Jens Franik wrote:
> 5) PDFcreator of Sourceforge and Sector7g (http://sector7g.wurzel6.de/)
>Download: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/
>Homepage: http://www.pdfforge.org/
> == NOT WORKING (still)
Confirmed with PDFforge
Hello Stefan,
Thursday, October 30, 2008, 11:24:58 PM, among other things, you wrote
ST> The problem is - this bug cannot be reproduced on our printers, so we
ST> should find a "proper" printer first.
What printer are you testing it on?
Here HP Deskjet F2180 via USB 'prints' a blank sheet.
If
am Samstag, 1. November 2008 um 21:09 schrieb Ian A. White:
> But can you open the Address Book having gone back to .13?
Yes, i can open it without any Problem.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.0.3
Hello Ian,
Saturday, November 1, 2008, 10:09:29 PM, among other things, you wrote:
IAW> G'day Roger,
->> On Sunday, November 2, 2008, 11:41:36 PM, you (Roger Phillips) wrote:
RP>> If I use version 4.0.34.13 there is no print problem!
IAW> But can you open the Address Book having gone back to .
Hello,
On 10/30/2008, 4:24 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote in
> The problem is - this bug cannot be reproduced on our printers, so we
> should find a "proper" printer first.
I'm also experiencing the same problem both with 4.0.34.15 and 4.0.34.17..
Lexmark E120 Laser printer connected
via USB. I
ght the fact that if they
reverted to that part of the 4.0.34.13 which controls printing they would
solve their problem. I was also trying to illicit from Stefan what is so
special about the printer that they say they have no problem with.
--
Best regards,
Roger
:flag
Hello Ian,
IAW> Access violation at address 00711368 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of
IAW> address 000C.
Thank you, but this information isn't enough, an excerpt from (of
entire file) the TheBat_exceptions.log file should be supplied
together with such a report.
--
Cheers!
Stefan
..."Bo
am Montag, 3. November 2008 um 22:08 schrieb Ian A. White:
IAW>>> Access violation at address 00711368 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of
IAW>>> address 000C.
> I have just upgraded to .18 and the printing and address book issues
> have been resolved.
It is
Hello Richard!
On Wednesday, September 21, 2005, 1:25 PM, you wrote:
> I'm getting a variety of AV messages when attempting to print from the
> main menu or with a message open. The latest is:
> "Access violation at address 74756120. Read address 74756120."
Confirmed.
Additionally, when I tri
Hello Richard,
> I'm getting a variety of AV messages when attempting to print from the
> main menu or with a message open. The latest is:
> "Access violation at address 74756120. Read address 74756120."
Confirmed.
--
Vili
Current be
Hello Richard!
On Wednesday, September 21, 2005, 1:39 PM, you wrote:
>> Additionally, when I tried a second time to print the highlighted body
>> of your message, not even an AV. Simply failed to bring up my printer
>> dialogue window as would normally happen.
> I found the same on any second a
Hi Richard Newman,
Wednesday, September 21, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
>> Additionally, when I tried a second time to print the highlighted body
>> of your message, not even an AV. Simply failed to bring up my printer
>> dialogue window as would normally happen.
> I found the
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, September 21, 2005, 2:25:47 PM, you wrote:
RN> Hello Batpeople,
RN> I'm getting a variety of AV messages when attempting to print from the
RN> main menu or with a message open. The latest is:
RN> "Access violation at address 74756120. Read address 74756120."
Confirmn
Hallo Richard,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:25:47 -0400GMT (21-9-2005, 20:25 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RN> I'm getting a variety of AV messages when attempting to print from the
RN> main menu or with a message open. The latest is:
RN> "Access violation at address 74756120. Read address 7475612
Hallo Mary,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:30:59 -0500GMT (21-9-2005, 20:30 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MB> Additionally, when I tried a second time to print the highlighted body
MB> of your message, not even an AV. Simply failed to bring up my printer
MB> dialogue window as would normally happen.
Hello Richard!
On Wednesday, September 21, 2005, 4:45 PM, you wrote:
>> Will you write a BT note? I will support it.
> Note is entered with ID 0005133.
Thanks. I've just written a confirming and supporting note.
For the convenience of others who might like to do this, here's a
link:
https://
Hallo Mary,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:46:18 -0500GMT (21-9-2005, 20:46 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MB> I have occasion to print from mails rather often, and I wouldn't like
I hardly do that, but I started using TB because at that moment it was
the only client that could print a message as a fi
Good day, Richard.
RN> I'm getting a variety of AV messages when attempting to print from the
RN> main menu or with a message open. The latest is:
RN> "Access violation at address 74756120. Read address 74756120."
Confirmed.
--
WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
[ICQ:179-598-229]|[Skype:inside_
Hello Richard,
A reminder of what Richard Newman typed on:
Wednesday, February 08, 2006 at 18:47:08 GMT -0500
RN> I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
RN> yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to large
RN> type and an exo
Hello Dwight,
Thursday, February 9, 2006, 10:06:38 PM, you wrote:
DAC> On Thursday, February 9, 2006, 2:20:07 PM, George M. Menegakis wrote:
>> Confirmed and not only in HTML. I had the same problem trying to
>> print a text message.
DAC> comfirmed, about one line a page, in huge letters
As fa
[Reply to: George M. Menegakis · 2006-02-09 · 21:20 h (CET)]
Hello, George!
>> I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
>> yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to
>> large type and an exorbitant number of pages (like
On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 5:47:08 PM, Richard Newman wrote:
> I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
> yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to
> large type and an exorbitant number of pages (like 88 instead of 2
> or
Hello Zygmunt Wereszczynski
Friday, February 10, 2006 - 6:13:28 PM you wrote:
---
Subject: .08 Printing Problems
---
ZW> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ZW> Received: from inas014.isp.belgacom.be (localhos
Hello Richard,
Thursday, February 9, 2006, 1:47:08 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Batpeople,
> I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
> yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to large
> type and an exorbitant number of pages (like 8
On Thursday, February 9, 2006, 2:20:07 PM, George M. Menegakis wrote:
> Confirmed and not only in HTML. I had the same problem trying to
> print a text message.
comfirmed, about one line a page, in huge letters
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
Hi Richard Newman,
Wednesday, February 8, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> Anyone else having these problems?
Same here, your mail would have been printed on 16 pages.
:(
--
kind regards
Charlene Ferrara
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.70.08 "Qigong" (Beta) on
Windows XP
Hi Richard Newman,
Wednesday, February 8, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
> yesterday in .07 hang the program
HTML doesn't crash TB here, but I would need tons of paper and gallons
of ink if I re
Hello Richard!
On Friday, March 10, 2006, 12:46 PM, you wrote:
> V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
> stamp.
> Confirmation?
Can't confirm. The message from you printed out over about 3/4 of an 8
1/2 x 11 sheet. From Rich Text View, using 8 pt. Arial Black.
--
On Friday, March 10, 2006, 12:46:35 PM, Richard Newman wrote:
> V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
> stamp.
> Confirmation?
not here. prints fine.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IM
in text.
It is strange, indeed. I am printing just fine in plain text, also,
with Lucida Sans Typewriter 12 pt.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.72.01 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 3.72.01 | 'Usi
Hello Richard!
On Friday, March 10, 2006, 1:33 PM, you wrote:
MB>> It is strange, indeed. I am printing just fine in plain text, also,
MB>> with Lucida Sans Typewriter 12 pt.
> Attached PDF "Mary1" is of what I get with 3.72.01 and "Mary2" is what
> I get
Hello Richard,
Friday, March 10, 2006, 7:46:35 PM, you wrote:
RN> V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
RN> stamp.
RN> Confirmation?
Not here. No problem with printing html-messages so far, either.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
hi,
Friday, March 10, 2006, 8:46:35 PM, you wrote:
> V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
> stamp.
> Confirmation?
umm... a consequence of trying to fix the old bug with large printouts by globally scaling the printed page?
--
regards,
vitalie
Hello Batpeople,
I still am totally illegible printed documents from 3.72.01/.02 per
the attached. I have not problem with the same documents printed from
3.71.03.
Before trying 3.72.02, I completely uninstalled The Bat! I remove all
data. I removed all references in the registry to The Bat and t
Hello Liste,
Could anyone confirm this bug?
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2291
--
Sincerely
Hendrik Oesterlin - email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber-IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ 215599852 - MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] - YIM moimeme666fr - AIM moimeme666fr
TheBat! 3.71.03 and Regula Anti-Spam Plugin 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gary!
On Friday, August 17, 2001 at 11:47:44 PM you wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that Beta/7 doesn't print in color? My v1.53o
> prints in color but the new Beta/7 does not.
Sort of, my PDF created from 1.54/7 didn't have colour in it.
Hello Kjartan,
Monday, June 2, 2003, 6:33:57 PM, you wrote:
KM> Selecting multiple mails in the message list and printing them only
KM> results in the first page of each mail being printed, so any mails that
KM> are more than 1 page long need to be printed individually.
Another solut
Hello Kjartan,
Monday, June 2, 2003, 6:33:57 PM, you wrote:
KM> Selecting multiple mails in the message list and printing them only
KM> results in the first page of each mail being printed, so any mails that
KM> are more than 1 page long need to be printed individually.
Only after s
Monday, June 2, 2003, 7:59:50 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
> Hello Kjartan,
> Monday, June 2, 2003, 6:33:57 PM, you wrote:
KM>> Selecting multiple mails in the message list and printing them only
KM>> results in the first page of each mail being printed, so any mails that
KM>&
Hallo Andrew,
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:24:20 +0100GMT (11-11-2008, 13:24 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
AG> Got a STOP 0x008e in a win32k.sys when tried to print using 4.0.34.19.
AG> On any printer: USB, lan or even PDF.
Can't confirm, neither on a USB nor with a LAN printer (vista 64 bits)
Hello,
Got a STOP 0x008e in a win32k.sys when tried to print using 4.0.34.19.
On any printer: USB, lan or even PDF.
The Bat! 4.0.34.19 + AntiSpamSniper 3.0.1.2
Windows Vista SP1 32-bit
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Current beta is 4.0.34.1
On Tuesday, November 11, 2008, 6:24:20 AM, Andrew Gurinov wrote:
> Got a STOP 0x008e in a win32k.sys when tried to print using 4.0.34.19.
> On any printer: USB, lan or even PDF.
I am still stopping dead when I print some html files. Sample sent
previously. Each of the daily files with that in
Hello Marek,
MM> I do not know if this will be implemented, users asking me about this, so I
MM> want to know, if Ritlabs plans to add HTML support to Print Setup too
Printing was using HTML from versions 1.0x, I believe :-) But I would
agree, it now must become more in tune wit
I tried printing an HTML email with a background. Part of the background
printed but no text
--
Rick
Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can
imagine. - Sir Arthur Eddington
v5.0.0.142 BETA on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
Hello Steven,
> Then I realized that it was there, just printed in WHITE
> just like it is shown on the screen!
Happy to say, it's fixed in the currently available Alpha :-)
--
Best regards,
Stefan
'Using TBBETA' information:
http://w
I dont observe this... 1-2 sec and printing starts. I am running
Voyager from an USB2 external 2.5", 40 GB Hitachi HDD (my old laptop
HDD).
(What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not
the way to go...)
--
Vili
___
Vili wrote:
> I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can
> optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for
> some reason you have got a power failure... Or I just dont trust MS to
> let them manage delayed writing :))
>
you have the exact same r
Hello tbbeta,
Have any of you tried running Voyager within a Private disk file
run from a USB drive.
http://www.dekart.com/products/encryption/private_disk_mf/
or
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/pd/
For me it has solved the speed and connect/dissconnect issues.
--
Best regards,
mfas
Vili wrote:
>> you have the exact same reasons with your 'usb-enclosed' HDD.
>> ...maybe even worse, given that write-back for USB flashdrives isn't
>> quite as optimistic as with HDDs (including those 'usb-enclosed').
>>
>
> :)) I dont know this stuff, all I am seeing is that with a USB stic
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
