Oh but I do, Kevin. However, I'm not inclined
toward 'darkening the corner where you are'.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 24, 2006 06:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
.innglory.org Sent:
March 23, 2006 18:39 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on CreationismWE DON'T NEED TO BE IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IF WE ARE DOING OUR JOB Our Job is NOT the school system or Politics, render unto Cesear Unless of course you are swayed by the Reconstructioni
Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 23, 2006 17:52 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on CreationismIs KD a pseudonym for Gary North? "if ever a continent of covenant-breakers deserved this attribution (extermination), the "native Americans" did."
al Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ;
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 4:36
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams
on Creationism
David !! Honestly, this is one of the sorriest posts you
A book truly perceptive re: human
nature.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 23:12
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Why is this so
hauntingly reminiscent of communication
You may feel to teach them that the universe is
geocentric if you like.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 23:23
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Im so thankful that
my 4
Still no.
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 23, 2006 23:04
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
If you thought it was true would you want it taught in schools, Lance? JD?
izzy
-Original Message--
The archbishop + nothing = first rate
teaching.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 24, 2006 00:01
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
What do I believe about
I'm humbled at your objectivity, Kevin.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 23:36
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Christian roots of our public education
system
N
Gettin' better and better! Why did you save the
best for last?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 23:41
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Lin
Both your presuppositions and your deductions are
available to be seen.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 19:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
So I prefer the concept of
Whatever 'YOUR JOB' is Kevin, y'all ain't bin doin'
it all that well AT TT!
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 18:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
W
Either that or, you are a TOTALLY IGNORANT BAPTIST.
I've made MY choice, Kevin.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 17:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Is KD a pseudony
im?
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David:YIKES!! You mischaracterize both Williams and his position. DOUBLE
YIKES!! I know that you
ursday, March 23, 2006 5:39 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
WE DON'T NEED TO BE IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IF WE ARE DOING OUR JOB
Our Job is NOT the school system or Politics, render unto Cesear
Unless of course you are swayed by t
ng? What does how long it takes for him to speak words have to do with how long it took for the world to come into being? I don't understand your point.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.or
ould you want it taught in schools, Lance? JD? > izzy > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 3:32 PM > To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
here else? Do you have any idea about the Christian roots of our public education system (before the
lefties took over?) izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 5:39 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject:
roots of our public education system (before the
lefties took over?) izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006
5:39 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
WE
Creationism
You have risen to new heights, soon to be appointed
ARCHbishop, John.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006
16:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Fw: Williams on
nglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March
22, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Fw: Williams on Creationism
So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support.
That A & E were spirit people. A 6000 year date or a 10,000 or
an "unknown" e.t. ? The versi
- Original Message -
> From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
>
>
> David:YIKES!! You mischaracterize both Williams and his position. DOUBLE
>
Weee, yeaahh. And your point?
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WE DON'T NEED TO BE IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IF WE ARE DOING OUR JOB
Our Job is NOT the school system or Politics, render unto Cesear
Unless of course you are swayed by
So I prefer the concept of believing in fundamental Christianity but not believing in fundamentalism.And that is while I prefer to believe the Special Revelation of God himself, I do not have a POPE or Potentate or Presbytery. I simply believe the revelation in the Book. JN 17:17 "Thy word IS Tru
http://www.cyberhymnal.org/htm/a/r/aruwashd.htm Have you been to Jesus for the cleansing power?Are you washed in the blood of the Lamb?Are you fully trusting in His grace this hour?Are you washed in the blood of the Lamb? Refrain Are you washed in the blood,In the soul cleansing blood of the Lam
WE DON'T NEED TO BE IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IF WE ARE DOING OUR JOB Our Job is NOT the school system or Politics, render unto Cesear Unless of course you are swayed by the Reconstructionists.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:What in the hell do you think I have been talking about? You are so
see
that which underlies the hatred that you spread throughout the mid-east and, elsewhere.- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 23, 2006 07:50 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on CreationismAGAIN you show your Short Comprehension I
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 4:36
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
David !! Honestly, this is one of the sorriest posts you have
ever written. First, an atheist mocks God and I am
d Miller
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
>
>
> David:YIKES!! You mischaracterize both Williams and his p
Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 16:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David !! Honestly, this is one of the sorriest posts you have ever written. First, an atheist mocks God and
You have risen to new heights, soon to be appointed
ARCHbishop, John.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 16:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
e to do with how long it took for the world to come into being? I don't understand your point.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTa
r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David:YIKES!! You mischaracterize both Williams and his position. DOUBLE
YIKES!! I know that you will continue to do so. You are truly trapped,
David. You've bo
nesday, March 22, 2006 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David:YIKES!! You mischaracterize both Williams and his position. DOUBLE
YIKES!! I know that you will continue to do so. You are truly trapped,
David. You've bound yourself with your own theology (not, as yo
6 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
I will give it a read, David.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 22, 2006 13:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
> David Miller wrote:
>>> H
]>
To:
Sent: March 23, 2006 14:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
To believe fundamental Christianity means to accept fundamental tenets of
Christianity. To believe fundamentalism means to embrace a sect of
Christianity which hammers on the fundamentals. What if that
:31 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Then maybe you can flesh it out for the rest of us.
I am sure Lance can not/will not
I am sure we can see the difference, but just what are the symptoms of that
particular ISM?
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lance wrote:
Thanks for that compliment (?), David. BTW, I'm not
embarrassed to read them either.
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 14:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Actually, the
ginal Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:47
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action="">
Polonium Radiohalos: The Model for
"I don't understand your point." = "Are you mocking
the concept I do understand?"
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 14:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
gt;
To:
Sent: March 23, 2006 14:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
John wrote:
"Believe in God's word" is fundy
code for "believe as I do."
After all this time, you still don't understand. If it is code for
anything, it is: "line
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:29
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support.
That A & E were spirit people.
John wrote:
> "Believe in God's word" is fundy
> code for "believe as I do."
After all this time, you still don't understand. If it is code for
anything, it is: "line up with my understanding of God's Word here, or show
me what the true understanding of God's Word is and help me to line up wit
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:29:33 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What in the hell do you think I have been talking about? You
are so far off course here, as to be just plain silly. I am not a "big
banger" nor do I believe that a lung fish is ancient family. In
fact, I am with t
ail.innglory.org ;
truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 08:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams
on Creationism
What in the hell do you think I have been talking about?
You are so far off course here, as to be just plain silly. I am not a
"
(he needs to be absolute
on what he's 'high-fiving', Bro:)
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:27:27 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
||
jd/*g:
"Believe in God's word" is * [typical techno legalistic..] code
for * " * [we're all damned
& goin' t'hell fer not] be
Oh, I guess he does KNOW, Judy.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 08:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
What in the hell do you think I have
What in the hell do you think I have been talking about? You are so far off course here, as to be just plain silly. I am not a "big banger" nor do I believe that a lung fish is ancient family. In fact, I am with the growing opinion that there has not been enough time for evolution to have wo
I am talking about what we teach in school and Judy comes back with something about "the secret things" and then Kevin, bless his little heart, comes back with something about reading the Bible --- NEW FLASH !!! Obviously TT as a DISCUSSION GROUP died some time ago !!
Over here , guys
-
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 07:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
AGAIN you show your Short Comprehension
I am NOT a REFORMED CATHOLIC.
wrong slot Lance, better take it to your friends for a consensus
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Spoken like a true studen of RJR.- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 22, 2006 21:05 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Let's have them Teach Dominion Theology in school ; )[EMAI
Spoken like a true studen of RJR.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 21:05
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Let's have them Teach Dominion Theology in school ;
)[EMAIL PROT
What is the point in pursuing dead letters when one
can
feast on a "living Word"
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:04:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Or, as on TT, theologically unknowing while
spiritually alive. This is much more the case.
From: Judy Taylor
So
HIGH Five[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:"Believe in God's word" is fundy code for "believe as I do." When we have been dispersed, take with you the knowledge that not one single Rad Fundy has given any of us a clue as to what "doctrine" they are talking about. You must obey the commandme
It is in the Bible READ IT[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:what on earth are you talking about, Judy !!! Secret things ??? So you decided to just stay off subject? Whatever. -- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Some ppl are willing to
Or, as on TT, theologically unknowing while
spiritually alive. This is much more the case.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 18:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw
k@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 15:43
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Well what are you about Lance Muir
Are you doing what God has called someone else to
do?
Are you criticizing what you think someone else is
doing that God didn't tell them
JD you are not keeping good company here - but then as
the old adage goes "birds of a feather"
You really should discuss what you know about and it is
obvious that you know nothing about
Rad Fundy's "Walking after the Spirit" or being a "doer
of God's Word" rather than a deceived
hearer only.
Well Mr. Teacher - what is the "right
answer?"
An opinion that is the same as yours? Why can't
we deal with a little reality here at the last.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:26:31 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And sure enough, you did this very thing -- Be sure to
answer with "the right
"Believe in God's word" is fundy code for "believe as I do."
When we have been dispersed, take with you the knowledge that not one single Rad Fundy has given any of us a clue as to what "doctrine" they are talking about.
You must obey the commandments !!! they yell to the others. W
..partic as "Word" is her trick
word
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:50:29 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..*implicitly*
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:44:01 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..& tt evidence
suggests her nn's ain't
biblical
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:29:20 -0700
..*implicitly*
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:44:01 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..& tt evidence
suggests her nn's ain't
biblical
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:29:20 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (this writer subjugates us
to her narrow notions,
permits us no faith i
..& tt evidence
suggests her nn's ain't
biblical
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:29:20 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (this writer subjugates us
to her narrow notions,
permits us no faith in God per se)
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
myth (this writer subjugates us to
her narrow notions, permits us no faith in God per
se)
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
..
jt:
ppl of faith believe
God's Word
And sure enough, you did this very thing -- Be sure to answer with "the right one, John -- duh !! Your wording a little different, but it is the same ridiculous non-answer.
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well of course you couldn't
what on earth are you talking about, Judy !!! Secret things ??? So you decided to just stay off subject? Whatever.
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Some ppl are willing to let God be God JD
The secret things belong to the Lord a
The schools have bigger problems to deal with. But maybe that is the planJudy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sure because this is what you are talking about JD; ppl of faith believe God's Word and wait for Him to give them understanding. Religious ppl have all kinds of theories, big bang,
Why don't one of you POTENTATES fix it. Or get your self some Pope or Protestant for a Politician. This would be the specialty of the Reformed Catholics, they are gonna bring in the kingdom ya know they are the promised people (JEWS) and they are gonna bring us all kicking and screaming into thei
Let's have them Teach Dominion Theology in school ; )[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I'm talking about fundy creationist versions in the school systems and you are talking about religious people!!! Amazing Maybe we should install a different creationist version for every major school system
Sure because this is what you are talking about JD; ppl
of faith believe God's Word and wait for Him
to give them understanding. Religious ppl have
all kinds of theories, big bang, black holes, and on and on.
You don't need to worry about fundies or school systems
JD because you don't have i
Well of course you couldn't tell them the Truth JD
could you?
I mean after all He is a Rock of offense and it might
offend the Muslims
We are responsible to instruct our own children - The
public schools don't
care what view anyone on TT holds do they?
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:22:56 + [EM
Some ppl are willing to let God be God JD
The secret things belong to the Lord and as Kevin says;
let the ppl serving
Caesar fumble around and follow whatever way the wind
is blowing.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:34:20 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Someone said
render
So true, so true KD
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:54:02 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
A man may be Theologically knowing while spiritually
DEAD.Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Let me get this straight JD.
By Rad Fundies you are talking ab
I'm talking about fundy creationist versions in the school systems and you are talking about religious people!!! Amazing
Maybe we should install a different creationist version for every major school system ... I am sure we can find enough fundy ideas to go around. That
We are still waitig !
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Someone said
render to Cesear what is Cesear's [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support. That A & E were spirit people. A 6000 year da
I surmised as much JD; my point being that religious
ppl have many
and varied points of view about anything and everything
and this is no
measure by which to gauge what is needful or
true.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:20:02 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you even know what this thread is a
Someone said render to Cesear what is Cesear's [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support. That A & E were spirit people. A 6000 year date or a 10,000 or an "unknown" e.t. ? The version that says it took God 144 hours to speak words that can be
So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support. That A & E were spirit people. A 6000 year date or a 10,000 or an "unknown" e.t. ? The version that says it took God 144 hours to speak words that can be spoken in 24 seconds !!! I just did it in 24 big ones !! including a d
Are you a grad of the Ur Mutha Wears Kombat Boots school of apologetics? One thing is for sure you always deal with the real issues![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:froth around the edges of the lips. -- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Then ma
froth around the edges of the lips.
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Then maybe you can flesh it out for the rest of us.
I am sure Lance can not/will not
I am sure we can see the difference, but just what are the symptoms of that particular
Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: March 21, 2006 13:12Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism> Yup is right, but how does he get from this thought to the idea that> creationism should not be considered in schools? I h
ch 22, 2006 1:25 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Let me get this straight JD.By Rad Fundies you are talking about people who believe Genesis as it iswritten
- Right?? PS What is wrong with the Carroll Dean's and the Pat R
I would rather FROTH at the mouth and attempt something than be a nothing, a 0 as far as evangelism goes! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Paul opposed the intolerant legalists in the church and so will I while, at the same time, writing the words of Romans 14. He is one of my mentors -- I will
Some charge that RW has No Absolute Morals! RW says "I have to distinguish plainly between personal theories and interpretations and the majority conviction of my Church"So opinions of Men as in the Majority consensus of his CHURCH is his Absolute guide! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main
- Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 22, 2006 14:24 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on CreationismLet me get this straight JD. By Rad Fundies you are talking about people who believe Genesis as it is written - Right?? PS What
March 22, 2006 10:50Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism> Lance wrote:>> One's time would be better spent reading>>
some noteworthy novelists than noteworthy>> creationists. Lift up Jesus and, creationISM,>> will fall away as it should.>>
A man may be Theologically knowing while spiritually DEAD.Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Let me get this straight JD. By Rad Fundies you are talking about people who believe Genesis as it is written - Right?? PS What is wrong with the Carroll Dean's and the Pat Robertsons of
Don't you get it JT? TRUTH is found in CONSENSUS! The opinions of Men are the key.Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So? There isn't a single fiew of the whole church that is agreed upon by the whole church either. What does that prove? judyt On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:27:56 +0
http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=""> Polonium Radiohalos: The Model for Their Formation Tested and Verified http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=""> But being that it is ICR research you may be too embarrassed to read it. ; ) http://www.icr.org/index.php?
Then maybe you can flesh it out for the rest of us. I am sure Lance can not/will not I am sure we can see the difference, but just what are the symptoms of that particular ISM? David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lance wrote:> Fundamental Christianity is [fine]... > FundamentalISM ought
And what do his other "works" say about him, to you? How do you feel about his taking part in a DRUID worship service?David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lance wrote:> If Williams is a 'liberal loonie' then> you are a 'sectarian loonie' , David.I'm sectarian only in the sense that the holy
ath. Both of you do your homework so that you might see just howwrong you are. (Bonus name: Thomas Weinandy).Go to it guys!- Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
Sent: March 22, 2006 08:39Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism> David
he source of his embarrassment? Rowan Williams is not embarrassed concerning our Lord ANYWHERE. He, not unlike many, are embarrassed over believers turning non-issues into 'issues'. (i.e. creationISM)- Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Se
There is something funny about a man that thinks he has such a direct line with God that he is able to discern God's will for another man!Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well what are you about Lance Muir Are you doing what God has called someone else to do? Are you criticizing wh
arrassment? Rowan Williams is not embarrassed concerning our Lord ANYWHERE. He, not unlike many, are embarrassed over believers turning non-issues into 'issues'. (i.e. creationISM)- Original Message ----- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: March 21, 2006 13
Well what are you about Lance Muir
Are you doing what God has called someone else to
do?
Are you criticizing what you think someone else is
doing that God didn't tell them to do?
Are you hearing God as to what he wants you to
do?
How do you know you are hearing God since noone can
know truth
e - > From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: > Sent: March 22, 2006 13:44 > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism > > > > David Miller wrote: > >>> Have you read Creation's Tiny > >>> Mystery, by Robert Gentry? &
>To: Sent: March 21, 2006 21:48Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism> If fundamental Christianity is a problem for you, of what spirit are you? > iz>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan>
eldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But its so much easier to sit on ones tuffet and criticize the work of others. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy TaylorSent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 1:25 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Truth
Paul opposed the intolerant legalists in the church and so will I while, at the same time, writing the words of Romans 14. He is one of my mentors -- I will do the same.
A Rad Fundy is not defined by the words she reads but by the froth of mouth as she "evangelizes" the lost.
If the
101 - 200 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
