a few, i checked in the changes about an hour ago.
Kelvin.
On 18/09/2007, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/18/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I just checked the LICENSE file against the lib directory of RC1c.
>
I just checked the LICENSE file against the lib directory of RC1c.
I'm sure this process could be more automated given time, but for
reference here's what I did
cd lib
ls | sed "s/[0-9\.]*\.jar//" > libnoversion.txt
then I hand finessed the list to remove more complex version tags such
as beta1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528095
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1685:
-
Any name overrides must be done with schema annotations, so
] 3 - 2=1.0
[java] 3 * 2=6.0
[java] 3 / 2=1.5
[java] Java Result: 1
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 8 minutes 4 seconds
Terminate batch job (Y/N)? y
On 17/09/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can run the calculator in 4 seconds, -- time until I see the &qu
I can run the calculator in 4 seconds, -- time until I see the "Run"
word on the screen approx 2 secs and then a further 2 before I see the
result output.
Kelvin.
On 17/09/2007, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made a local distro from the branch and the samples seem to take ages to
> ge
I've been playing with the RC1a release candidate and came across a
problem particular to my environment which took me a while to figure
out. When trying to run a sample I was getting ...
C:\Release\apache-tuscany-sca-1.0-incubating\tuscany-sca-1.0-incubating\samples\calculator>ant
run
Buildfile:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528040
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1296:
-
I think I am seeing this issue when trying to build on linux
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527546
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1638:
-
I have now run the test, seen the failure, applied the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527498
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1638:
-
I was trying this, but don't see "Run as ..
On 12/09/2007, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So how about trying to graduate Tuscany from the Incubator? :-)
+1
>
> We seem close though there are a few things to sort out so it will take a
> couple of months to get ready.
>
> There's a draft proposal at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluenc
utting a branch and working on
> > a DAS release sometime this week. Please let me know if there is any
> > changes in plan.
> >
> > On 8/28/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There are no plans in place yet for the next SDO release.
> >
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526097
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1527:
-
I resolved the interface awkwardness in commit 574177
(http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525399
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1638:
-
In the absence of a test case for this I manually altered the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525115
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1659:
-
I get no errors on my pendrivelinux env (a debian derivative
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525099
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1659:
-
could you please attach the report file from the target/sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1359:
Patch Info: (was: [Patch Available])
patch available flag was set in error
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson closed TUSCANY-1540.
---
Resolution: Fixed
tests from patch added to the new toolsTest project
> Abstract Sta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525075
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1638:
-
Could you please say how you re invoking the generator and what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525038
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1527:
-
Here are the commits into my sandbox over fresh copies of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525030
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1527:
-
I had a play with this and have enabled notifications in our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1399.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Added toolsTest project to the SDO reactor build and migrated
I agree with ant. I had an issue recently with SDO relying on a
back-level release that had been removed.So I think the thing to
do is to help new users avoid the trip hazard of inadvertently
downloading a back level release by structuring our web pages
helpfully.
Kelvin.
On 30/08/2007, ant
t; attention to the first two items you listed below - test generated static
> > SDO APIs and multi-threaded scenario more easily.
> >
> > I did some investigation on GroboUtils for multi-thread testing and still
> > couldn't find any remote repository hosting the tool
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523531
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1527:
-
This kind of feature is something that has been mentioned a few
Having released 1.0-incubating, what are the priorities for SDO Java now.
I'm just catching up on reading the lists having taken a break. The
major things I had in mind before going away were to
- rearrange the project structure to permit generation of java classes
during maven tests (TUSCANY-1
Is this still an issue? It looks odd, because the stack trace
includes FactoryBase which is in the impl jar, where the SDOFactory
interface also resides.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 13/08/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From the stack trace below, this doesn't really sound like
There are no plans in place yet for the next SDO release.
1.0-incubating would seem the obvious choice.
Kelvin.
On 28/08/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would be my guess unless there's a newer SDO release by then but i've
> not seen any mention of that in the SDO emails.
>
> ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518771
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1182:
-
TUSCANY-1006 also discussed a multi threaded test case. I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1006.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.0-incubating release
of the Java SDO project.
This project provides an implementation of the SDO 2.1 specification
[1] and this is our first release to provide full coverage of the
specification. In addition to completing the few remaining SDO
The vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO 1.0-incubating has completed
with 5 +1 votes being cast (3 IPMC binding) and no -1s (see the
tuscany-dev list vote thread [1] and the incubator-general vote
approval thread [2]). Thank you for reviewing and voting.
I will therefore proceed with the deploymen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518690
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1006:
-
Looks good to me -- caters for all possibilities. Will this be
sounds sensible to me, +1 to handling this within Axis2.
Kelvin.
On 09/08/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thats right, these are the Axis2 tools just with some patches on top to add
> support for SDOs and to fix bugs we've come across before we got the bugs
> fixed in the Axis2 code.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1445.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518509
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1006:
-
Thanks Ron, I'll take a look at the attributions in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518496
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1006:
-
Before we get too far down the line with using the backport
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1484.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-Next
Applied patch, thanks Ron
Can anyone point me to the info for using GroboUtils in a maven
environment please? I've googled around and found a couple of change
notifications to very old poms that show use of GroboUtils, but they
lead me up blind alleys. I guess what I need is the artifactId,
groupId and hosting repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518185
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1006:
-
My inclination would be
1) to make a soft dependency on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518156
]
kgoodson edited comment on TUSCANY-961 at 8/7/07 6:53 AM:
There is no SDO imposed re
Adriano,
are you still seeing this. Could you attach a zip of the stack
traces please?
Regards, Kelvin.
On 03/08/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> java version "1.5.0_12"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518156
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-961:
There is no requirement to keep the Types for each DAS in separate
I think you need the fix in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1408 that is part of the
1.0-incubating release which is currently being voted on.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 25/07/07, Upeka Bulumulle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Tuscany SDO version: Tuscany SDO 1.0 beta1.
>
> I'm t
Yes Pete, you are correct. The XML schema sequence concept fixes the
order of elements in that sequence. The SDO Sequence concept is there
to preserve the instance ordering of elements when the metadata does
not fix it.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 03/08/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A
Amita,
I only just got to this, buried in a mountain of things I need to
catch up on. Here's the reference you were looking for I think.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-user/200701.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Kelvin.
On 10/07/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H
I just fixed the permission in the sdo part of the maven snapshot
repo, as described in [1], so that all committers should be able to
publish snapshots. I also published a new snapshot.
Kelvin.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg20908.html
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517984
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-961:
I don't think you need instances of HelperContext crossing th
Please review and vote to release the 1.0-incubating distribution of
Tuscany SDO for Java
The release candidate RC4 for Tuscany Java SDO archive distribution
files are posted at [1]
The release audit tool (rat) files and associated exceptions are
posted at [1] also
The maven repository artifacts a
commonj.sdo.helper;version="${specVersion},
> commonj.sdo.impl;version="${specVersion}"
>
>
>
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-javadoc-plugin
> 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>
> 2.0
>
>
>
> package
> package
>
> jar
>
>
&g
he samples readme exists only on binary distribution,
> there is no samples readme on source distribution.Shouldn't the source
> distribution contain the samples readme?
>
> Regards,
> Adriano Crestani
>
> On 7/28/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
&
> > ${pom.name}
> > > ${pom.description}
> > > ${pom.organization.name}
> > > plugin
> > > commonj.sdo
> > >
> > > commonj.sdo;version="${specVersion}",
> > > commonj.sdo.helper;version="${specVersion},
> > > commonj.
sion}",
> commonj.sdo.helper;version="${specVersion},
> commonj.sdo.impl;version="${specVersion}"
>
>
>
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-javadoc-plugin
> 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>
> 2.0
>
>
>
> package
> package
>
>
e: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name
> for sdo api maven artifact
> To: kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> When would you like to apply this? How about later on today and I'll do
> the
> associated changes as well?
>
>...ant
>
Hi Amita,
The serialization of the opposite property reference in the graph looks
like it is suffering from an issue that was reported in TUSCANY-1421 and is
now fixed in the trunk/1.0 release.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 26/07/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Current RDB DAS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1468:
Attachment: 1468_sdo_part.patch
This represents the required changes to the SDO projects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1437:
Attachment: 1437_sdo_part.patch
> SDO API project has inappropriate groupId and artif
Please review and vote to release the 1.0-incubating distribution of Tuscany
SDO for Java
The release candidate RC3 for Tuscany Java SDO archive distribution files
are posted at [1]
The release audit tool (rat) files and associated exceptions are posted at
[1] also
The maven repository artifacts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1470.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Generated SDO APIs have compilation errors when sub-type has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515246
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1399:
-
To do this we need to add another project to the SDO reactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515241
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1143:
-
adding the missing instrumental word to Fuhwei's comment
Please vote to release the 1.0-incubating distribution of Tuscany SDO for
Java
The release candidate RC2 for Tuscany Java SDO archive distribution files
are posted at [1]
The release audit tool (rat) files and associated exceptions are posted at
[1] also
The maven repository artifacts are posted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1143.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Generated code should separate metadata creation from registrat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1428.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> XSD2JavaGenerator.GeneratePackage information is inva
Implementation
Reporter: Kelvin Goodson
Fix For: Java-SDO-Next
TUSCANY-1429 contained a fix for the 1.0-incubating relese of SDO that altered
the previously unreleased Tuscany APIs to use the HelperContext as a scope
argument rather than a TypeHelper, see ...
http://www.mail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1429.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Resolving this but will open a jira to complete the updates to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1350.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Reorganise SDO build / distribution lay
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1446.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-1.0
> Java SDO samples don't
get(i)).getName() with say "DataGraphRoot"
//and if it matches use that type
}
Or otherwise, the client will be forced to use a new instance of
HelperContext each
time.
Am I missing something here?
Regards,
Amita
On 7/20/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
&g
tch
//((Type)lst.get(i)).getName() with say "DataGraphRoot"
//and if it matches use that type
}
Or otherwise, the client will be forced to use a new instance of
HelperContext each
time.
Am I missing something here?
Regards,
Amita
On 7/20/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having recently installed europa and the latest javajet stuff, I believe
this making of the NL variable public is the default behaviour of the
emitter.
Kelvin.
On 19/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: frankb
Date: Thu Jul 19 14:00:46 2007
New Revision: 557770
URL: ht
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513989
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1457:
-
My guess is that david will be using the ones from the javadoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513987
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-961:
Best practise now is, if possible to manage your scopes for types
Thanks, I'd be happiest to leave it until the middle of next week if that
fits with you.
Kelvin.
On 19/07/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Kelvin.
When do you plan to make the changes? I can help on the SCA side.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -----
Fr
Headline message for SCA (and perhaps DAS) -- this is notice of a change
that will require minor updates in order not to break the build
We have 2 new things in SDO that are of significance to this message that
have come about since the beta1 release.
1) An improved notion of what embodie
I did 15 and am now looking at applying T-1429
Kelvin.
On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course I meant fix, not fox, and more importantly TUSCANY-1446, not
1146
Kelvin.
On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 16 is done, wi
Of course I meant fix, not fox, and more importantly TUSCANY-1446, not 1146
Kelvin.
On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
16 is done, will now do ...
15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
central instructions for running samples
)
10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
I think perhaps also we should make a quick fox for tuscany-1146 (samples
don't compile with java 1.4.2)
Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
he list to make sure that they are sending to the list first,
and optionally the poster second.
------ Forwarded message --
From: kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 18-Jul-2007 09:35
Subject: Re: [SDO Java] things to be done for SDO release - please help
To: Fuhwei Lwo <
aspect of the
scenario when posting just now.
Kelvin.
On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ant,
sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that the JIRA
components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I did mention
in the JIRA that we
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437 a few days back
with multiple components, touching DAS and SCA as well as SDO in order that
it was understood that there were impacts on all these components.
The groupId for the API artifact needs to change to
org.apache.tuscany.sdoand
12 is done
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops, I copied 3 across unnecessarily-- it's done. I'm back looking at
12 now.
Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 11 seemed to be a no-op
> 13 is done
> 14
I posted a response to this on the tuscany user ML to say that the class can
be found in the beta1 binary distro in the
sdo-api-r2.1-1.0-incubating-beta1.jar file.
Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, Sam Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I posted this on the user list as well, but it is relevant
Oops, I copied 3 across unnecessarily-- it's done. I'm back looking at 12
now.
Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
11 seemed to be a no-op
13 is done
14 is done
leaving ...
2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
Simon,
have you seen the response on the thread "SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build
break in implementation-das?" from luciano saying that he published a DAS
snapshot just a few minutes ago. I guess you may have run your build just
a few minutes too early to catch it?
Regards Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, Si
javadoc
17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have now ported 4 or 5 fixes that had been made to the trunk but not to
the branch (task 3). While we are in this pre-release phase if you could
create a pat
I just published a fresh SDO snapshot
Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kelvin or others working more closely with SDO, could someone please
publish the latest SDO Snapshots ?
On 7/18/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a clean checkout this morning
the branch. Better still would be to apply the patch to the branch too.
Now I'm going to look at the samples javadoc issues, phase 1 = tasks 11,
12, 13, 14
Regards, Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just did 4,5,7,8,9,10(a) -- still not run the linu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513610
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1430:
-
The symptoms that led to this JIRA are described in
http
javadoc
17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
I'm going to tackle 3 now
Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm going to number off the non jira related tasks so that its easy to
reference them
I just did 1 and now plan t
io sample
Regards, Kelvin
On 17/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This release is running later than I had hoped due to extra jiras being
added to the plan, and a few issues that have come up after recent fixe, so
we are a bit behind where I'd proposed we should be in t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1110.
-
Resolution: Fixed
2nd patch applied to trunk and branch
> Improve the performance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson reassigned TUSCANY-1110:
---
Assignee: Kelvin Goodson
> Improve the performance of TypeHelperImpl.getType(Cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson reopened TUSCANY-1110:
-
> Improve the performance of TypeHelperImpl.getType(Cl
This release is running later than I had hoped due to extra jiras being
added to the plan, and a few issues that have come up after recent fixe, so
we are a bit behind where I'd proposed we should be in terms of getting this
release out. Please help with some of these TODOs if you can. If you pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1445:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-0.91)
Java-SDO-1.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513286
]
Kelvin Goodson edited comment on TUSCANY-1445 at 7/17/07 9:17 AM:
--
comment in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513286
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1445:
-
can you assign this to a different component please
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513285
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1428:
-
Hi David,
do you have any test code that would fail before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513278
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1429:
-
Fuhwei,
thanks for this. One issue I have is the casting of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson closed TUSCANY-1189.
---
> Remove workarounds after switching to EMF
201 - 300 of 1127 matches
Mail list logo
