Ernie Dunbar wrote:
Oct 5 13:26:39 pop spamd[19660]: Cannot open bayes databases
/home/spamc/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
Oct
The typical cause of this is that the file ownership changed on the
bayes files when you converted them to 3.0. At least this was the
Jan-Pieter,
Can you open a bug against 3.0.0 on bugzilla.spamassassin.org and attach
the patches (use the Create a new attachment link after the bug has
been opened)?
My main concern is the increase in CPU time required (since multiple
spamd processes will be running), especially on boxes that
Michael Parker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:11:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any documentation for the spamd client interface?
MIMEDefang can talk to clamd.sock directly, using the commands in man
clamd, rather than spawning `clamdscan` processes. I checked man
John Rudd wrote:
As long as people are thinking about new implementations of
spamc/spamd, I'd like to make a couple suggestions:
1) make room for passing a reference to a message instead of the message
itself, to reduce network latency when it is not necessary (for
example, if the spamd
hill all,
i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body message like this :
--
ÅóÓÑ£¡ÄãÓÐûÓÐÔÚÍøÉÏÏë¿´µçÓ°ÓÖÕÒ²»µ½ÕæÕýÃâ·ÑµÄÍøÕ¾µÄ¾Àú£¿ºÃÈÝÒ×ÕÒµ½Ò»¸öºÅ³ÆÃâ·ÑµÄ¿Éµ½Í·À´
²»ÊÇÈÃÄãÌîÊÖ»úºÅÂë¾ÍÊÇÈÃÄãÓʾּÄÇ®»òÍøÉÏÖ§¸¶£¬ÏÖÔÚºÃÀ²£¡ÓÐÁËÎÒÌṩµÄÈí¼þ£¬
--
is there custom rule for doing that?
Ever since signing up with AllofMP3.com (a Russian MP3
site), I've been getting tons of e-mail like that.
--- Gian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hill all,
i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body
message like this :
--
John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) make room for passing a reference to a message instead of the message
itself, to reduce network latency when it is not necessary (for example,
if the spamd chosen just happens to be on localhost (because it's part
of a list of servers that are being
At 07:26 AM 10/7/2004 +0700, Gian wrote:
hill all, i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body message like
this : --
ÅóÓÑ£¡ÄãÓÐûÓÐÔÚÍøÉÏÏë¿´µçÓ°ÓÖÕÓ²»µ½ÕæÕýÃâ·ÑµÄÍøÕ¾µÄ¾Àú£¿ºÃÈÝÓ×ÕÓµ½Ó»¸öºÅ³ÆÃâ·ÑµÄ¿Éµ½Í·À´
²»ÊÇÈÃÄãÌîÊÖ»úºÅÂë¾ÍÊÇÈÃÄãÓʾּÄÇ®»òÍøÉÏÖ§¸¶£¬ÏÖÔÚºÃÀ²£¡ÓÐÁËÎÓÌṩµÄÈí¼þ£¬
--
Dear SpamAssassinators,
My spamassassin began to fail suddenly.
I have been trying to update/fix it without success. I keep
getting messages with --version in them, such below.
Please help!
---
. . .
/usr/bin/perl build/preprocessor
Wayne M Barnes wrote:
Dear SpamAssassinators,
My spamassassin began to fail suddenly.
I have been trying to update/fix it without success. I keep
getting messages with --version in them, such below.
Please help!
version.h.pl: version.h.pl: Can't locate Digest/SHA1.pm in @INC (@INC
You
(FreeBSD 4.10 and Debian linux unstable), but this might have issues
on inferior OSes from the Evil Empire. I haven't checked this. If it
does, however, I suggest adding a test for $Config{'osname'} eq 'MSWin32',
and just calling sleep in that case.
The changes work equally well on the superior
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:54, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:01 AM 10/6/2004, Ron McKeating wrote:
Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles
unless SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis. Ooops
now nobody will see this email.
SA can, does and will
If it's necessary then it should be added, but someone already
posted here that it works fine on Win2k (so I expect Win2k3 works too,
and it probably even works on older WinNT). It might still have issues
on Win98 (and derivatives like WinME) and possibly on WinXP.
If it works on W2K it will in
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:42:48 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
Haven't seen these myself, but if they are drug spams, make sure you have
the obfu drug rules installed and maybe up the score on some of them.
Should have gotten about 4 hits in that first sentence.
Yes, the drug rules are catching them,
-Michael Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: -MichaelPS ignore the learn method for now, that's from something else I'mworking on.Hello Michael,how far is your engagement in enhance the learn method to spamc/spamd?As i stated here http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201i would
I resolved my issue. The problem was related to qmail-scanner and not
spamassassin (--scanner=verbose VS. fast spamassassin). Sorry about that.
Jean
Jean Caron writes:
I read everything I could find... still doesn't work. I don't get it.
I want to enable the header Level _STARS(*)_. The
How do I find out which modules are installed for SA on my server?
Where do I find a list of all available modules I can install with links to
those modules?
Thanks,
Brett
We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a
message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not
changed. Here is the header info.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from
-Original Message-
From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed
We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a
message this morning that I do
Carnegie, Martin wrote:
We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a
message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not
changed. Here is the header info.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=16.9 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_DATE,
-Original Message-
From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:37 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: How to find out installed modules?
How do I find out which modules are installed for SA on my server?
Where do I find a list of all
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:00 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed
Carnegie, Martin wrote:
We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working
great. I had a
Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick
:-)
--Chris
So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must
be missing something.
Martin Carnegie
There was no subject on the original; so the header couldn't be
rewritten.
Dallas posted a patch on Bugzilla: 3605.
-Original Message-
From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [SA-LIST] Subject
-Original Message-
From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:04 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed
Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick
:-)
--Chris
So
Carnegie, Martin wrote:
Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick
:-)
--Chris
So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must
be missing something.
Martin Carnegie
The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature,
not a
- Original Message -
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Brett Romero' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:03 AM
Subject: RE: How to find out installed modules?
-Original Message-
From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL
Jim Maul wrote:
The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature,
not a bug.
-Jim
Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature?
-tom
Chris Santerre wrote:
http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin
How does this book compare to the O'Reilly book, by Schwartz?
-ste
The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is
a feature,
not a bug.
-Jim
Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature?
You could flat out reject mail without a subject header.
--
Dallas Engelken
NMGI
On 2004-10-07 10:37:32 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin
Release date November 1999
Yes, it should be at the press by now. :-)
Best regards
Martin
PS: If it applies to SA3, the description should mention that.
--
Martin Schröder,
Martin Schröder wrote:
On 2004-10-07 10:37:32 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin
Release date November 1999
Yes, it should be at the press by now. :-)
Best regards
Martin
PS: If it applies to SA3, the description should mention that.
Hmm. When
On 2004-10-07 10:48:53 -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
Hmm. When I go to that link, it says the release date is October 2004.
What are you looking at?
An older version. :-)
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5,
-Original Message-
From: Shaun T. Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:39 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Book has gone to press
Chris Santerre wrote:
http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin
How does this book compare to the
Hi,
I had bayes_path ~spamd/bayes in my local.cf until I noticed, that the
part between ~ and / is ignored, resulting in a bayes_path of ~/bayes.
It's not a big deal to give the full path, but that should be in the docs.
Regards,
Jakob
-Original Message-
From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:27 AM
To: Chris Santerre; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to find out installed modules?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Brett
- Original Message -
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Brett Romero' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chris Santerre
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:59 AM
Subject: RE: How to find out installed modules?
-Original Message-
From:
Brett Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2004 09:27:10 AM:
- Original Message -
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Brett Romero' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:03 AM
Subject: RE: How to find out installed
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:03:33AM -0400, Brett Romero wrote:
However, when I analyze a file with
spamassassin -tD filename.html
I get these lines:
debug: config: read file C:\Perl\site/share/spamassassin/25_spf.cf
debug: SPF: message was delivered entirely via trusted relays,
not
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Hi,
I had bayes_path ~spamd/bayes in my local.cf until I noticed, that
the part between ~ and / is ignored, resulting in a bayes_path of
~/bayes. It's not a big deal to give the full path, but that should
be in the docs.
I don't think it's a bug...
what does ~spamd/
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
I don't think it's a bug...
what does ~spamd/ mean? I'm not familiar with that kind of syntax.
~ usually means home directory of the calling user... and that's
expanded for you...
There's an idiom in the web world of calling personal user folders
/~user (as in
Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, done, bug #3881.
Thanks.
My secondary concern is that you'll never almost get responses from
other blacklists and this might result in a lower hit rate (since a
negative response is still a response). That should probably be
addressed via
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:11:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there any documentation for the spamd client interface?
MIMEDefang can talk to clamd.sock directly, using the commands in man
clamd, rather than spawning `clamdscan` processes. I checked man
spamd and man spamc
Vivek Khera said:
I'm not using Bayes since the filtering is site-wide at the smtp server
level.
I use bayes sitewide for 600 users, and have processed a few million
messages.
Bayes sitewide works well, as the spam email is obviously unlike the
normal mail anyone receives.
I would enable bayes
Matt :
I use the postfix(MTA)+ amavisd+ S.Assassin solution. If I understood what
you wrote its impossible to block it (based in my solution), is it ?
Ps. If your answer is yes; could we consider it a S.Assassin?s flaw ?
-Mensagem original-
De: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel A. de Araujo wrote:
Matt :
I use the postfix(MTA)+ amavisd+ S.Assassin solution. If I understood
what
you wrote its impossible to block it (based in my solution), is it ?
Ps. If your answer is yes; could we consider it a S.Assassin?s flaw ?
SMTP conversation goes like this -
At 12:01 PM 10/7/2004, Daniel A. de Araujo wrote:
Matt :
I use the postfix(MTA)+ amavisd+ S.Assassin solution. If I understood what
you wrote its impossible to block it (based in my solution), is it ?
Pretty much. Unless amavisd has some clever tricks up it's sleeve to split
the message into
At 12:08 PM 10/7/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SMTP conversation goes like this - server responses in parentheses
(ESMTP spam-server.example.org - welcome!)
EHLO spam-server.example.com (OK)
MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK)
RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK)
RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK)
DATA
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
In my setup this is not an option, because I run SA as a milter, via
spamass-milter. If every process has to die after the scan, it cannot
pass the results of the scan to Sendmail (at least, this is what
happened after I tried this option, so I kept on
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:19:17AM -0300, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
In my specific case, the ponit isn't only woth the big memory usage
jumps, but with SA keeping the memory, and never releasing it.
Highwater marks, common in most perl applicatios, don't
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote:
FWIW, in our case a child would go to 320MB and just stay there
until the child was terminated (even after finishing a message). We do
use AWL and bayes.
Is it possible to try and find the msgs that was being scanned at
Keith Hackworth wrote:
Even though you run this in mysql now, it still DOES matter who you run it
as. I found out the hard way that it records the user that is logged in
as the user the bayes applies as in the database. I had to actually set
the bayes_sql_override_username in my local.cf. I
It works if the user's profile is loaded. Usually sa is run from some
startup daemon. Daemons are usually started with a very minimal
environment - maybe a little bit of path, and some OS type settings and
they rarely execute some .login/.cshrc script to load the environment.
With no true user
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote:
FWIW, in our case a child would go to 320MB and just stay there
until the child was terminated (even after finishing a message). We do
use AWL and bayes.
Is it possible to try and find the
Here is an odd spam header:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,CLICK_BELOW,
DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,DCC_CHECK,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN,
FORGED_THEBAT_HTML,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,
It works great. Thank you very, very much
Slava MadritGlobal Network ManagerS A L A N S[EMAIL PROTECTED]+1.212.632.8311
"Dallas L. Engelken" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/7/2004 10:07:18 AM
-Original Message- From: Carnegie, Martin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07,
I am running Postfix 2.1 with a content_filter (latest amavisd-new) which sends
all mail through SA 2.64. I understand *some* variables that are defined
explicitly in amavisd-new are special, and thus have no effect when defined
(differently) in local.cf. AFAIK, scores are not included in this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running Postfix 2.1 with a content_filter (latest amavisd-new) which sends
all mail through SA 2.64. I understand *some* variables that are defined
explicitly in amavisd-new are special, and thus have no effect when defined
(differently) in local.cf. AFAIK, scores
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2004 03:35:07 PM:
I am running Postfix 2.1 with a content_filter (latest amavisd-new) which
sends
all mail through SA 2.64. I understand *some* variables that are defined
explicitly in amavisd-new are special, and thus have no effect when
defined
Quoting snowjack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...Did you restart amavisd-new after making the change?
Yes. :-)
--
Sahil Tandon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting snowjack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...Did you restart amavisd-new after making the change?
Yes. :-)
Is there any evidence that local.cf is getting read at all?
61 matches
Mail list logo