On Thu, 10 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rosenbaum, Larry M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 10:10 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Poor performance with v3.2.0
sa-compile took 3 hours to run. (System is a SunFir
> -Original Message-
> From: Rosenbaum, Larry M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 10:10 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Poor performance with v3.2.0
>
> sa-compile took 3 hours to run. (System is a SunFire v210
> with 2 processors and 2 GB
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
.rp wrote:
I just switched from using spamassassin to spamc in our procmail.
*
is there an equivalent of 'spamassassin -d' for spamc?
Do you really mean "spamassassin -D"? -d does markup stripping, -D does
debugging.
If so, you can pass -D to
Thanks for straightening me out on that Vincent.
Folks - for completeness here are some instructions for the WORKAROUND.
Locate your Message.pm module and edit the section in the begining as
indicated below.
I have been running this now for a couple of hours with no adverse affects
(that I can se
Gary V wrote:
> I have links to some of the files that used to be in this location:
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/
>
> compare that URL to this one:
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/
>
> Who would know if the files that used to be there will be returned to
> t
.rp wrote:
> I just switched from using spamassassin to spamc in our procmail.
>
>*
> is there an equivalent of 'spamassassin -d' for spamc?
>
Do you really mean "spamassassin -D"? -d does markup stripping, -D does
debugging.
If so, you can pass -D to spamd, but you'd have to debug every
I have links to some of the files that used to be in this location:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/
compare that URL to this one:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/
Who would know if the files that used to be there will be returned to that
location?
Gary V
On Wed, May 9, 2007 6:20 pm, Jerry Durand wrote:
> I've been checking all the archives of this list as well as bugzilla and
> google searches, can't find anything about this. Obviously I'm looking in
> the wrong place.
Found it, Loren added an "s" to the file name, that's why I couldn't find it!
On Wed, May 9, 2007 5:10 pm, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> What do I put in the messages.pm and where do I put it?
>
> Its 'use bytes;' YOu'll have to search back in the archives for a message
> describing exactly where it goes.
>
> Note this isn't a FIX, this is a tempoary WORKAROUND.
>
I've been check
What do I put in the messages.pm and where do I put it?
Its 'use bytes;' YOu'll have to search back in the archives for a message
describing exactly where it goes.
Note this isn't a FIX, this is a tempoary WORKAROUND.
Loren
What do I put in the messages.pm and where do I put it?
Thanks.
=
Kevin W. Gagel
Network Administrator
Information Technology Services
(250) 562-2131 local 448
My Blog:
http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/blogs/gagel
-
On 5/8/2007 7:18 PM, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
Is anyone else seeing an increased FP rate after upgrading to 3.2?
I've got a number of reports coming in like:
AXB_XMID_1212, which defaults to 3.899 and was
causing a fair amount of legitimate mail to one of our customers to fail
Replace 'AXB_XM
I just switched from using spamassassin to spamc in our procmail.
* is there an equivalent of 'spamassassin -d' for spamc?
* spamd is running with
'-d -H -s /usr/temp/spamd.log -u esp -r /var/run/spamd.pid' .
spamc is running with '-u esp' , which is a normal account.
Yet in the
On Wed, May 9, 2007 10:37, Chris wrote:
>
> One thing, my hosts say that I'm not able to do this if
> I'm on shared hosting - are you saying that there's a
> way to do this on shared hosting please ?
>
> Out of the ways that have been kindly recommended here,
> which one would be the easiest for a
On Wed, May 9, 2007 10:10, BG Mahesh wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:36, BG Mahesh wrote:
>>
>>
>>> We have tested this on http://cause.greynium.com/spamtest.php
>>> We have constructed a Mail header, concatenating $message to $header
>>> an
Is anyone else seeing an increased FP rate after upgrading to 3.2?
I've got a number of reports coming in like:
>AXB_XMID_1212, which defaults to 3.899 and was
>causing a fair amount of legitimate mail to one of our customers to fail
Replace 'AXB_XMID_1212' with a handful of other rules with s
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:13, Chris wrote:
> I will look into that - I would prefer the emails from
> some countries to not even reach my pc in the first place - so bearing that
> in mind, is procmail still recommended in this instance please ?
If your hosting provider offers procmail, yes. The may
- Original Message -
From: "RobertH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: attack, bug, or just misconfig?
Hi there
Wasn't there a recent thread on this one?
Umm here is the error
spamd[705]: Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuati
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm
line 234.
Do you have the Fu
>>
>> is there any way check mx record as from ip adress and compare it sender ip
>> address ? so spamassassin can decide its spam ??
>>
Hi,
some domains, unfortunately only few, use spf (or domainkeys) to declare the
machines allowed to
send mail for the domain. Now, If such information exis
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Bayes auto expiries (taking to long and getting killed)? I think
that's a 600 second timeout.
We're not using auto-expiry. Bayes expiry is being done with a batch
job.
It would be interesting on some system experiencing this slowdown to
put
Tim Litwiller wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm
line 234.
Do you have the FuzzyOCR plugin installed? A
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm
line 234.
Do you have the FuzzyOCR plugin installed? At least one version of
That fixed it! Thank you!
Daryl C. W. O wrote:
>
> Make sure that the Razor2 plugin is being loaded. The loadplugin line
> for it is in v310.pre. If enabled (and the .pm file isn't missing,
> you'll see it being loaded in the debug output).
>
> Daryl
>
--
View this message in context:
harp2812 wrote:
I have 3 mail servers with relatively identical configurations that I just
upgraded to MailScanner 4.59.4 and SpamAssassin 3.2.0. Two of them are
working fine, however on one of them, sa-compile won't run, due to the
spamassassin --lint check failing.
"spamassassin --lint --debu
I have 3 mail servers with relatively identical configurations that I just
upgraded to MailScanner 4.59.4 and SpamAssassin 3.2.0. Two of them are
working fine, however on one of them, sa-compile won't run, due to the
spamassassin --lint check failing.
"spamassassin --lint --debug" only turns up
Why does the SA list accept postings from unsubscribed email addresses?
- rh
--
Abba Communications
Spokane, WA
www.abbacomm.net
Hi there
Wasn't there a recent thread on this one?
Umm here is the error
spamd[705]: Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte
0x00, immediately after start byte 0xd2) in pattern match (m//) at
/etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_adult.cf, rule SARE_OBFUFCK1, line 1.
Can easil
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm
line 234.
Do you have the FuzzyOCR plugin installed? At least one version of
Tim Litwiller wrote:
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm line 234.
Do you have the FuzzyOCR plugin installed? At least one version of it
tried to call this non-
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm line 234.
Dan Schwartz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm running sendmail 8.14.1 configured to do authenticated e-mail
relaying with port 587 and TLS encryption. When our users authenticate
and send a message sendmail changes the received header line to look
like this -
Received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'll just answer the second of your questions and leave the first part
to those that know better how to diagnose ;)
Jason Frisvold wrote:
> Speaking of which, is there any sort of BCC rule that pumps up the
> score if the mail is BCCed? I can see a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> We are currently running SpamAssassin 3.1.7. Can we run dnswl.org with
> this version of SpamAssassin?
Sure - it uses regular DNSBL-style lookups. dnswl.org data (and the
rules) should work in almost any version of
Greetings,
Am I correct in saying that the "proper" way to set a default
required_score is in the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file?
I'm running SA 3.2.0 and I seem to be unable to change the default
required_score. I'm using spamc/spamd for processing via simscan.
Per-user rules are enabled
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:13:58AM +1200, BQ wrote:
> >Yep, it's gotta be -D bayes, not just -D
>
> Thanks - this works great. It would be good if this little thing gets
> included in the manual pages - it's either not there or I missed it
> (quite possible :).
fyi: http://wiki.apache.org/spamass
Matt,
On 5/10/07, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BQ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I had some false positives that also had BAYES_99 triggered.
>
> As I saved the original e-mail(s), I'd like to see what tokens
> actually caused this. Is it possible to do this with Spam Assassin
> 3.1.8?
spa
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:14:24AM -0500, Gabriel Millerd wrote:
> Beyond the s/3.1.20/v3.2.0/ issue that some people cannot get past.
> I have the same issue. I had to juggle my cf/pre files entries for
> quite some time to get past the check_scan problem you describe for
> spamd to run peachy.
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Duane Hill writes:
I've been doing some testing with v3.2.0 on my local machine and am seeing
a test that is triggering. I'm going to share the IP it is triggering on
in hopes someone can point out what I'm missing.
[71849] dbg: received-header: parsed
Duane Hill writes:
>
> I've been doing some testing with v3.2.0 on my local machine and am seeing
> a test that is triggering. I'm going to share the IP it is triggering on
> in hopes someone can point out what I'm missing.
>
> [71849] dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=162.42.148.100 rdns=
I've been doing some testing with v3.2.0 on my local machine and am seeing
a test that is triggering. I'm going to share the IP it is triggering on
in hopes someone can point out what I'm missing.
[71849] dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=162.42.148.100 rdns=
helo=smtpgate.ndunet.com by=a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm running sendmail 8.14.1 configured to do authenticated e-mail
relaying with port 587 and TLS encryption. When our users authenticate
and send a message sendmail changes the received header line to look
like this -
> Received: from dyn041100.cc.l
> Bruno Henrique de Oliveira wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want the spamassassin work with files user_prefs and bayes_path for
>> user. Anyone can help me ?
>>
>
> Can you elaborate a bit more on your setup? SpamAssassin does this by
> default, but making it work depends on how you call spamassassin.
>
>> Bayes auto expiries (taking to long and getting killed)? I think
>> that's a 600 second timeout.
We're not using auto-expiry. Bayes expiry is being done with a batch
job.
> It would be interesting on some system experiencing this slowdown to
put
> 'use bytes' back into SA and see what happe
Bruno Henrique de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want the spamassassin work with files user_prefs and bayes_path for
> user. Anyone can help me ?
>
Can you elaborate a bit more on your setup? SpamAssassin does this by
default, but making it work depends on how you call spamassassin.
BQ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I had some false positives that also had BAYES_99 triggered.
>
> As I saved the original e-mail(s), I'd like to see what tokens
> actually caused this. Is it possible to do this with Spam Assassin
> 3.1.8?
spamassassin -D bayes < message.eml
>
> I vaguely remember that
Hi,
BG Mahesh wrote:
>
> The content should be reported as Spam. The score (when I run from
> command line is just about 1.0 and required is 5.0). The text in
$message
> have very hardcore words. Shouldn't it be marked as spam?
>
> Are we formating the header
>
> The content should be reported as Spam. The score (when I run from
> command line is just about 1.0 and required is 5.0). The text in
$message
> have very hardcore words. Shouldn't it be marked as spam?
>
> Are we formating the header correctly (i.e. each line is ending with
\n)?
'hardcore'
Peter Mikeska (MiKi) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want ask some1 of you about version of SA 2.70.
> This release was released ever ? or it was just abandoned and
> replaced with 3.0 ? If it exist , could you please provide me link ?
>
> thank you
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-us
> >>Thanks for the info Bret. What I've come up with is this:
> >
> >>header _FROM_DOMAIN From ~= /example\.com/i
> >>header _SPF_TRUE /\bSPF_FAIL\b/
> >>meta DOMAIN_SPF_TRUE (_FROM_DOMAIN&&_SPF_TRUE)
> >>score DOMAIN_SPF_TRUE 10.0
> >
> >>Will this work?
> >
> > Kinda, with
Hello,
I want ask some1 of you about version of SA 2.70.
This release was released ever ? or it was just abandoned and replaced
with 3.0 ?
If it exist , could you please provide me link ?
thank you
--
Best regards,
Peter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Recently I had some false positives that also had BAYES_99 triggered.
As I saved the original e-mail(s), I'd like to see what tokens
actually caused this. Is it possible to do this with Spam Assassin
3.1.8?
I vaguely remember that previously I ran spamassassin in debug mode
and that it show
We are currently running SpamAssassin 3.1.7. Can we run dnswl.org with
this version of SpamAssassin?
Can I put in lines like this in local.cf?
# dnswl.org file
header __RCVD_IN_DNSWL
eval:check_rbl('dnswl-firsttrusted,'127.0.\d+.1')
header RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW eval:check_rbl_sub('dnswl-firsttr
Hi all,
I want the spamassassin work with files user_prefs and bayes_path for
user. Anyone can help me ?
thz.
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
If you want a test,
cd /usr/ports/devel/re2c
rm -rf
get http://www.secnap.com/downloads/re2c.tgz
Untar it, make and install it, run sa-compile, and uncomment the RulesX2
line in v320.pre
Doesn't seem to do anything for SARES rules (I have ONE compil
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:29, Chris wrote:
> But what happens to the email that fails the threshold
> of spam filtering ?
If it's below the threshold, it may get a subject modification, it
probably gets a new header or two. If it's above the threshold, it
probably gets a new header or two, and then
If you want a test,
cd /usr/ports/devel/re2c
rm -rf
get http://www.secnap.com/downloads/re2c.tgz
Untar it, make and install it, run sa-compile, and uncomment the RulesX2
line in v320.pre
Doesn't seem to do anything for SARES rules (I have ONE compiled rule in
rule_500) but it does seem to work.
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:01 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Poor performance with v3.2.0
>
>
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:45:32PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > I have to admit that I'm s
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:20 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Can SpamAssassin delete mails just from
certain
> countries ?
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:13, Chris wrote:
>
> > I will look i
Gokhan ALKAN wrote:
>
> I have received some mails that from domain and return-path domain
> is different and from domain is in whitelist nowadays. So
> spamassassin decide mail that is ham . because of user_in_whilist rule.
Rule 1: DO NOT use whitelist_from unless you have NO other options. U
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:13, Chris wrote:
> I will look into that - I would prefer the emails from
> some countries to not even reach my pc in the first place - so bearing that
> in mind, is procmail still recommended in this instance please ?
If your hosting provider offers procmail, yes. The may
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:44 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Can SpamAssassin delete mails just from
certain
> countries ?
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2007 10:37, Chris wrote:
> >
> > One thing, my
On Wed, May 9, 2007 10:10, BG Mahesh wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:36, BG Mahesh wrote:
>>
>>
>>> We have tested this on http://cause.greynium.com/spamtest.php
>>> We have constructed a Mail header, concatenating $message to $header
>>> an
On Wed, May 9, 2007 10:37, Chris wrote:
>
> One thing, my hosts say that I'm not able to do this if
> I'm on shared hosting - are you saying that there's a
> way to do this on shared hosting please ?
>
> Out of the ways that have been kindly recommended here,
> which one would be the easiest for a
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:00 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can SpamAssassin delete mails just from
certain
> countries ?
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:57, Ruben Cardenal wrote:
> > Chris wro
I ran your first sample through SA here and got the following score :-
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FRT_PENIS1,
HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_HB_SEP,
MISSING_MID,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.2.0
To ensure all is working okay, why not take a existing SPAM message and
construct the $message from that and test ?
On Wed, 9 May 2007 14:40:52 +0530, "BG Mahesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:36, BG Mahesh wrote:
>>
>>
> I have received some mails that from domain and return-path domain is
> different and from domain is in whitelist nowadays. So spamassassin
> decide mail that is ham . because of user_in_whilist rule.
Instead of "whitelist_from" you should use "whitelist_from_rcvd", eg to
whitelist mails fr
On 5/9/07, Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:36, BG Mahesh wrote:
> We have tested this on http://cause.greynium.com/spamtest.php
> We have constructed a Mail header, concatenating $message to $header and
> passing the contents of $header to the code given above.
>
>
On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:57, Ruben Cardenal wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> Anyone know if you can get Spamassassin to block and/or
>> delete emails from certain countries if you are on shared hosting please
>> ?
>>
>>
>> Any help very much appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>>
>>
> Just add
On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:36, BG Mahesh wrote:
> We have tested this on http://cause.greynium.com/spamtest.php
> We have constructed a Mail header, concatenating $message to $header and
> passing the contents of $header to the code given above.
>
> We have installed the script from rulesemporium to u
Chris wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone know if you can get Spamassassin to block and/or
delete emails from certain countries if you are on
shared hosting please ?
Any help very much appreciated.
Chris.
Just add a custom rule for matching the desired countries and use
procmail to deliver it to /dev/
On 4/17/07, Derek Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 16:52 +0530, BG Mahesh wrote:
>
> hi
>
> I want to pass the comments/text entered by users on a form to
> SpamAssassin for approval. If it approves it only then I want to
> accept the text, else I want to inform the user
Hi all,
Anyone know if you can get Spamassassin to block and/or
delete emails from certain countries if you are on
shared hosting please ?
Any help very much appreciated.
Chris.
Loren Wilton wrote:
Thanks for the info Bret. What I've come up with is this:
header _FROM_DOMAIN From ~= /example\.com/i
header _SPF_TRUE /\bSPF_FAIL\b/
meta DOMAIN_SPF_TRUE (_FROM_DOMAIN&&_SPF_TRUE)
score DOMAIN_SPF_TRUE 10.0
Will this work?
Kinda, with few changes:
I have received some mails that from domain and return-path domain is
different and from domain is in whitelist nowadays. So spamassassin decide
mail that is ham . because of user_in_whilist rule.
can i block this spam that check mx records as from domain and compare sender
ip address ?
Thanks for the info Bret. What I've come up with is this:
header _FROM_DOMAIN From ~= /example\.com/i
header _SPF_TRUE /\bSPF_FAIL\b/
meta DOMAIN_SPF_TRUE (_FROM_DOMAIN&&_SPF_TRUE)
score DOMAIN_SPF_TRUE 10.0
Will this work?
Kinda, with few changes:
header __FROM_DOMA
77 matches
Mail list logo
