Re: [AFMUG] Email Server

[Rob Genovesi]

That's their retail price.  You can do much better on a wholesale agreement
- price will probably depend on your quantity.  We got in real early and
got a very good price that may not be available anymore.

As for tech headaches:  yes we have autodiscover set up and that catches a
lot.  The biggest headaches are the uber-non technical that are afraid to
do anything without "professional guidance" (we use that term loosely
around here) or hacked/disabled accounts that need a password reset.

We use Google Apps internally and I love Gmail - was considering switching
to G (before they pulled the plug on the ISP edition).  I polled some
customers about it and we had more than a few customers that were concerned
with Google getting in their pants.

-Rob

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Steve Jones 
wrote:

> https://www.rackspace.com/en-us/email-hosting/webmail looks like around 2
> bucks now
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Matt 
> wrote:
>
>> What is the pricing for rackspace email?
>>
>>
>>

Re: [AFMUG] Email Server

[Rob Genovesi]

Only 10 minutes?  Consider yourself lucky!  Getting stuck on long email
support calls is frustrating, but then I look at the numbers and its still
a profitable service for us.  We charge $5/month or $50/annually for e-mail
account.  We have customers that have moved away, or switched providers,
but keep the e-mail active, we still have some revenue there.

We switched from in house to Rackspace several years ago, been happy with
them.


-Rob


On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Adam Moffett  wrote:

> Does it matter?  If you spent 10 minutes answering an email support
> question, you'll never get those 10 minutes back.
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Mike Hammett" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: 2/21/2018 10:41:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Email Server
>
> What are people doing to cause an administrative burden?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> 
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] VDSL2 DSLAM options

[Rob Genovesi]

Good question!  Ours is at 17a (the default).  30a is unnecessary
because we're rate limiting lower speeds (capacity constrained by
microwave back haul).




On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you using a 17a or 30a profile with that?
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Rob Genovesi <r...@corp.coastside.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> Sam,
>>
>> Modems are syncing at ~100 Mbps DL and ~50 Mbps UL.  We rate limit
>> with a Mikrotik at the head-end.  Loop lengths are very short, under
>> 1kft.  We use SmartRG modems (SR515ac) which are integrated
>> modem/Wi-Fi routers.
>>
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Sam Lambie <samtaos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Rob,
>> > What speeds are you seeing to the CPE?
>> > What modems are you using? Do they have wireless capability or do you
>> > add
>> > another Router off of that?
>> >
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] VDSL2 DSLAM options

[Rob Genovesi]

Versa DSLAM we got off Amazon.

I sent you my sales rep info for SmartRG.  There are other vendors
available for modems as well (we've also used Zyxel and Zhone).  I
prefer SmartRG because they have a TR-069 ACS platform we are now
utilizing for remote management of modems.


-Rob

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Sam Lambie  wrote:
> Great. Now, where to buy them?
>

Re: [AFMUG] VDSL2 DSLAM options

[Rob Genovesi]

We have a Versa VX-M208S at a small MDU to use existing copper.  No
frills, just works.



Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA


On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Sam Lambie <samtaos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is what the DSLAM supports for VDSL2
>
> Here is a link to their model page:
> https://www.versatek.com/product/vx-m208s-8-port-vdsl2-mini-ip-dslam/
>
> VDSL2 ITU-T G.993.2
> VDSL2 Profiles: 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d, 12a, 12b, 17a and 30a
> 802.1d L2 Bridging
> DHCP /Client/Relay/Option82
> IEEE 802.1q VLAN Tag base
> VLAN Stacking (Q-in-Q)
> IEEE 802.1d Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)
> IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>> If your loops are short enough, use g.fast.
>>
>>
>> From: Sam Lambie
>> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 9:51 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] VDSL2 DSLAM options
>>
>> Hey all,
>> I am looking at replacing a very old DSLAM that we have had in operation
>> for the past 13 years. It is slow and dying. Looking at VDSL2 and am
>> wondering if any of you have had experience with them.
>> The building is an old 1980's concrete behemoth that is a wifi killer,
>> hence the need for the DSLAM.
>> Versatek has been good to me with other adsl2+ locations, but since we now
>> have 100 mbps+ of FTTH available to many MDUs, it make sense to look into
>> faster DSLAM.
>>
>> What about modems as well? Any particular brands that work better than
>> others?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sam
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Sam Lambie
>> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
>> 575-758-7598 Office
>> www.Taosnet.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Sam Lambie
> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
> 575-758-7598 Office
> www.Taosnet.com

Re: [AFMUG] fusion splicer recommendations?

[Rob Genovesi]

Thanks everyone for the feedback - super helpful!

Fujikura has the strong brand name, but seems like people have success
with the other brands as well.  I noticed the Fujikura 12s is clad
alignment were the other options are core alignment.  From what I've
ready core alignment would be preferred?

Gotta pull the trigger soon, I'm leaning towards the Oriontek T40.
The all-knowing Google turned up some others having good experience
with it.


Thanks,

Rob

[AFMUG] fusion splicer recommendations?

[Rob Genovesi]

found some info on the list but it was about 2 years ago so I thought
I'd ping again and see if there's any new info out there.

Looking for recommendations on the E-bay variety fusion splicers (ie:
$3-5k)  - wondering what people have tried and liked?  IE the Eloik
ALK-88 http://www.eloik.org/products/ALK_88.html


-Rob

Re: [AFMUG] Managed WiFi question

[Rob Genovesi]

We have been demoing SmartRG's device manager.  We do both xDSL and fixed
wireless, SmartRG has a nice xDSL modem/router we've been using for
awhile.  They have an ethernet model that could work with fixed wireless,
fiber, etc.  http://www.smartrg.com/hardware

Their Device Manager is a TR-069 platform, designed to work with SmartRG
products but you can incorporate other products that support TR-069 with
some (a lot of)work.  I'm sure they would be happy to integrate other
products - for a price.  http://www.smartrg.com/device-manager

So far seems to be a pretty simple/solid platform for managing customer
devices, changing Wi-Fi SSID/passwords, etc and basic troubleshooting
inside the network.  It has a basic customer portal so that customers can
login and self-help.

Functional, but not the "wow factor" I was hoping for when trying to figure
out our next generation managed platform.  Would really love to see
Ubiquiti do an MSP version of AmpliFi - would jump all over that.  All.
Over. That.


-Rob


On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:29 AM, George Skorup 
wrote:

> We've been demoing Calix ConsumerConnect+ and GigaCenter routers. It's not
> bad, especially on the fiber side. Might need a cost analysis for a typical
> WISP though.
>
>
> On 7/26/2017 12:20 PM, Christopher Gray wrote:
>
> To reply to the original question:
>
> We use a few options:
>
> *Cambium R200 provisioned by cnMaestro (leased for $9-$12 per device
> depending on area)
> *UniFi USG / UAP provisioned by off-site UniFi Controller (purchased
> outright then managed for $5 + $5 per device)
> *Mimosa G2 no remote provisioning, requires external network access
> (leased for $9-$12 per device depending on area)
>
> I'm surprised at how few people want access to change anything. I do have
> one company on UniFi that I have provided with a controller login. With the
> R200, I allow customer control from the Basic login, but I've only had one
> person ask about it. It is easy enough to re-provision the R200 that I'm
> not that concerned about people making their own changes on the limited
> accounts.
>
>
> --
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Gino A. Villarini 
> wrote:
>
>> We do it using Cloud based mngmt platforms:
>>
>> We offer Cambium Pilot 201 Router and Xclaim X2’s for $9.95
>> Meraki MR 33 and up starting from $19.95 up to $39.95
>>
>> We charge a setup and install fee that goes from $49.95 to $99.95
>> depending on the contract term.
>>
>> We include: Cable drop, config, FW updates, lifetime management and
>> replacement.  Meraki is the best Cloud mngmt.  of the 3
>>
>> There is really a need for a Amplifi/Eero type of product for MSP's
>>
>> From: Af  on behalf of Harold Bledsoe <
>> hbledso...@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" 
>> Date: Monday, July 24, 2017 at 5:25 PM
>> To: "af@afmug.com" 
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Managed WiFi question
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> For those of you offering managed WiFi to your subscribers, how do you
>> provision the devices?  And day 2, do you let the subscriber make changes?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Hal
>>
>>
>>
>> *Gino A. Villarini*
>> President
>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers

[Rob Genovesi]

Ooma has launched a partnership programs with ISPs.  It's not fully
white label as it requires the customer to use Ooma equipment (which
means you can't use your own ATA).  An interesting option for anyone
looking to add VOIP service without any overhead.

We're not doing this (yet) but have talked to Ooma a few times.  If
you want more info contact Tim Sullivan: tim.sulli...@ooma.com.



Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA


On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> OK, then quote me white label hosted voip.
>
> From: Eric Kuhnke
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 4:27 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers
>
> Okay so that's not wholesale voip as telecom sales people would usually
> define it. Wholesale usually meaning you connect your own SIP server and run
> the traffic through a trunk, or set of trunks to different providers based
> on optimal routing to destination. What you're looking for is usually called
> white label hosted voip.
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>> Each ATA will register to the VOIP supplier.
>>
>> No, I already have a VoIP server called a GenBand Class 5 central office
>> switch.
>> I will not be using that for this service.
>>
>> From: Eric Kuhnke
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:59 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers
>>
>> I think you may misunderstand VoIP  This is a gross oversimplification
>> but in general an ATA speaks analog POTS/dialtone on one side, and
>> ethernet/IP and SIP on the other. Do you intend to have each the ATAs
>> connect individually, directly to the service provider, or do you plan to
>> run your own VoIP server which they will register to?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Not looking for SIP trunking.  The calls will come from and go to an ATA
>>> in the subscribers home.
>>>
>>> From: Eric Kuhnke
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:47 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers
>>>
>>> How many DIDs and how many minutes/month of SIP trunking are we talking
>>> about?  You're looking for a whoelsale SIP trunking provider to use with
>>> your own VoIP system, or you want it fully hosted?
>>>
>>> What kind of monthly spend are you looking at if you took all of your
>>> minutes/month and figured that via wholesale SIP trunk they might cost an
>>> average of 7/10ths of 1 cent per minute (0.007/min)?
>>>
>>> Voxbeam, Flowroute and Voip Innovations come to mind.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I need a wholesale voip provider to serve my ILEC territory in Utah.  I
>>>> would port my local 801-789 numbers to the VOIP provider.
>>>>
>>>> We need unlimited LD and solid 911.  Would prefer someone local.
>>>>
>>>> So, before I give XMission a call I thought I would put this out there.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] New competition in town

[Rob Genovesi]

More sense and more cents.


On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Mike Hammett  wrote:

> When you have more time and money?  :-p
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
>
>
> 
> --
> *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Thursday, April 27, 2017 11:39:25 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] New competition in town
>
> My favorite version:
>
> There is always enough time and money to do it right the second time.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Prince
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 10:31 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New competition in town
>
> I'm reminded of the old saw: "If you have the time to do it over, why
> didn't you have the time in the first place?"
>
>
> bp
> 
>
> On 4/27/2017 9:28 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> > On 4/27/17 07:29, Jay Weekley wrote:
> >> Bleeding money you can't afford to lose and trying to make every dollar
> >> count.
> >
> >
> > Even if I were at the "UBNT WISP starter kit" stage I'd at least do a
> > decent mount lest the thing flip over in the wind and break stuff that
> > will cost more to fix. Fixing broken equipment isn't making even
> > dollar count.
> >
> > ~Seth
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers

[Rob Genovesi]

What version is the G2 running?

I believe there was an issue on v1.0 that was later fixed.  Read up
here: http://community.mimosa.co/t/a5-c5-speedtest-ceiling/1793/6

-Rob



On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Ryan Ray  wrote:
> C5 is negotiating at 1G but the router is obviously only negotiating at
> 100Mb.
>
> I don't see this issue on any G2's in routed mode or any G2's in passthru
> with a 1g client behind it.
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Rory Conaway  wrote:
>>
>> Are the ports negotiating at 1Gbps?  I just checked the client we have and
>> he has had peaks of over 40Mbps although 95% of his bandwidth is under
>> 10Mbps.  Turn it over to tech support and see what they say.
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 10:10 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>>
>>
>>
>> Weird, haven’t seen it but I only have 1 customer with his own router
>> behind a G2. I’m checking it now.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Ray
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 10:08 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes. I can replicate it on multiple G2's, multiple 100Mb routers and
>> cables and multiple site locations.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Rory Conaway 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ryan, something is wrong.  Did you try a different G2 or cable?
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Ray
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 9:42 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>>
>>
>>
>> It was an after need. They wanted to implement a system with their own
>> router but needed internet right away. So I left a G2 and switched it into
>> passthru after they were ready.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Rory Conaway 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I’m sort of confused.  Why are you using a G2 if you have your own router?
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Ray
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:04 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>>
>>
>>
>> Not sure if anyone else is deploying the Mimosa platform en-mass but came
>> across a new issue today in case you're fighting with things.
>>
>>
>>
>> The issue: Client Router receives very poor download no matter what signal
>> conditions are like. Download capped around 10Mb/s. Upload was unaffected.
>>
>>
>>
>> The equipment:
>>
>> A5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>>
>> C5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>>
>> G2 in passthru – 1.1.2 Version
>>
>> Client Router – Asus N600
>>
>>
>>
>> The problem:
>>
>> G2 has an issue with 100Mb routers. Plugging in a 1Gb client into the
>> passthrued G2 resulted in full speed. Plugging a 100Mb router caused the
>> download to drop to 10Mb/s levels.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The solution:
>>
>>
>>
>> Replace G2 with regular power supply, fixed issue.
>> In C5 change the duplex from auto to 100MF, fixed issue while still using
>> G2.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Zirkel Mounts for radios

[Rob Genovesi]

Haven't seen that mount before.  If you have trouble finding them the
Mimosa "FlexiMount" might be a good alternative (~$7 MSRP)
: http://mimosa.co/product#accessories-section

-Rob



On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Nate Burke  wrote:

> I've always bought these off Ebay
> [image: 10 Pack of Antenna Mounts for Motorola / Cambium Canopy and
> Ubiquiti Antennas]
>
> '10 Pack of Antenna Mounts for Motorola / Cambium Canopy and Ubiquiti
> Antennas'  I've always referred to them as 'Zirkel' Mounts.  The last
> auction expired in Feburary, and there don't' seem to be any others right
> now.  Does anyone know where to get these from?  My Stock is out.
>
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/10-Pack-of-Antenna-Mounts-for-
> Motorola-Cambium-Canopy-and-Ubiquiti-Antennas-/141266325396?hash=
> item20e4210f94:m:mbtRpGADYgZayq8reDNnwNw
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] municipal owned conduit agreement

[Rob Genovesi]

Thanks Chuck, I will forward this to them.

However I think some real world examples of agreements in other towns
(specifically with non-CLEC) will enable things to move faster.  The
more data I can put in front of them to support my cause the better.

If any has such agreements (or know of such agreements) please send along.

Thanks in advance,

Rob




On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> Yes also see paragraph 274, 338, 364, 449
>
> -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 9:52 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] municipal owned conduit agreement
>
>
> You are a utility, at least the FCC says you are.
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Rob Genovesi" <r...@corp.coastside.net>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: 2/28/2017 11:42:02 AM
> Subject: [AFMUG] municipal owned conduit agreement
>
>> All little town owns a few blocks of conduit they put in some time ago
>> during a side walk remodel.  I'd like to get an agreement with them to
>> use it, ie: free access for the city in exchange for space in the
>> conduit.
>>
>> They need convincing that I don't need to be a utility to do this.
>>
>> Does anyone (who is not a CLEC) have an agreement with a town/city for
>> use of conduit/muni-right of way that they would be willing to share?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
>> 650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Test. 1 2 3

[Rob Genovesi]

It's on - now get back to work!  ;-)


Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA


On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kind of creepy when everyone is (apparently) off actually working?
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 2:07 PM, Jaime Solorza
> <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Is thing on?
>
>

[AFMUG] municipal owned conduit agreement

[Rob Genovesi]

All little town owns a few blocks of conduit they put in some time ago
during a side walk remodel.  I'd like to get an agreement with them to
use it, ie: free access for the city in exchange for space in the
conduit.

They need convincing that I don't need to be a utility to do this.

Does anyone (who is not a CLEC) have an agreement with a town/city for
use of conduit/muni-right of way that they would be willing to share?


Thanks,

Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik quick view for unknown subnets

[Rob Genovesi]

Create a firewall address list of all known good subnets.
Create a forwarding rule in your firewall to accept known good subnets
to forward from customer side to WAN side
Create a forwarding rule to drop everything else coming from customer
side to WAN side

/ip firewall address-list add list="customer" address="x.x.x.x/x"
/ip firewall address-list add list="customer" address="y.y.y.y/y"
/ip firewall filter add chain=forward src-address-list="customers"
in-interface="LAN" out-interface="WAN" action="accept"
/ip firewall filter add chain=forward in-interface="LAN"
out-interface="WAN" action="drop"

You could start with a logging rule for unknown traffic first and
watch for what pops up.


-Rob


On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 2:18 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
 wrote:
> Im mainly looking for IP space that shouldnt be present, DHCP or not.
> I can packet sniff and exclude all configured subnets on that bridge, but
> its a pain
> I didnt know if there was arp monitor or something along those lines.
> collecting gratuitous ARPs or something like that
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] 'splain me sumptin

[Rob Genovesi]

No body was streaming because everyone was THERE

otherwise I assume they would use a CDN service







On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Chuck McCown  wrote:
> I have never understood how you can set up a streaming server and deliver
> hundreds or thousands of streams without having our upstream BW be stream BW
> X # of streams.  Each stream has its own session, right?
>
> So with folks watching the coronation via CNN streaming, CNN cannot possibly
> have a pipe large enough to give each user its own BW.
>
> I understand how simple this is with multicast, but I have always presumed
> that multicast does not traverse the public internet?  Hard enough to get it
> to work flawless internally with IPTV.
>
> There is probably some kind of UDP broadcast type of thing that I have just
> been unaware of.

Re: [AFMUG] Converting vectors to a shape (.SHP) file?

[Rob Genovesi]

If the data set is small you can find the other GPS coordinates using
something like this:  http://www.geomidpoint.com/destination/

Once you have all the GPS points it's easy to create a KMZ file with the shape.

-Rob



On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Bill Prince  wrote:
> The vectors describe a property line, and start at a fixed WGS84 coordinate.
> Then it's a series of distances and azimuths from there. I tried drawing
> them with GE, but there is an accumulation of small errors. There are about
> 10 vectors total.
>
> Something like starting at point lat/lon, go 700 feet azimuth 8° 27' 42",
> then 200 feet azimuth 27° 15' 08", and so on.
>
>
> bp
> 
>
> On 11/27/2016 9:13 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>> Is the end result displaying your vectors on GE?   If so there are ways to
>> just import them as a text file.
>> I did it, don't recall how, perhaps I used some kind of app but in the
>> end, it was easy.  I may have just drawn a line and then reverse engineered
>> the KMZ or KML file.
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Bill Prince
>> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 8:58 AM
>> To: Motorola III
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Converting vectors to a shape (.SHP) file?
>>
>>
>> I have a boundary between parcels that is described as a series of
>> vectors (distance & bearing) from one point. Apparently this can be
>> imported into Google earth as a shape file (.SHP extension). I have been
>> looking for, but not finding a tool that allows me to enter the vectors
>> in text, and spit out the .SHP file. Does anyone know where I might find
>> this?
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber

[Rob Genovesi]

> Paul at believewireless wrote:
>> Seems like a race to the bottom on pricing.

Agreed.  It can create an atmosphere for race to the bottom pricing.
With little to no barrier to entry anyone can come into the market
undercut the existing providers with cheap land grab tactics.  These
providers typically don't last and go out of business, but they drag
down legitimate companies with them.  It happened plenty of times in
the golden age of dial-up.

I despise over regulation but it could create a large enough barrier
to entry that only serious operators would enter the market and that
might prevent race to the bottom, at least for a little while.

All that being said, I don't agree with a monopolistic environment either.


>> I'm sure spammers and DCMA violators will love it!
>
> How do you figure the above applies?

That seems pretty obvious, DCMA violators will just keep jumping to
the next service provider any time their current provider is forced to
turn them off.

-Rob

Re: [AFMUG] Level 3 Outage?

[Rob Genovesi]

Looks like we're effected via Digium's cloud service.  Outbound works
fine but no inbound.


Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA


On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Craig Schmaderer
<cr...@skywaveconnect.com> wrote:
> Looks like level 3 is out across the country?  I am seeing tweets all across
> the country.  We are down on inbound level 3 sip, anyone else?
>
>
>
> Craig R. Schmaderer
>
> CEO | Skywave Wireless, Inc.
>
> Ph: 402-372-1975 | Fax: 402-372-1058
>
> Direct: 402-372-1052
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Possibly Compromised

[Rob Genovesi]

If it's not a DNS server for clients just go to IP -> DNS and uncheck
"Allow Remote Requests"  ... and add firewall rules.

-Rob

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:

> Yeah, admittedly I haven't done much other than mess around with some
> blacklists on this one.
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Mike Hammett  wrote:
>
>> Instill some basic network security. I block input to potentially harmful
>> ports, but a better way is to only allow input on ports you want.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>> --
>> *From: *"Jason McKemie" 
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 6, 2016 12:14:31 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Possibly Compromised
>>
>> Well, disabling remote requests dropped it off steeply.  I'll have to
>> look into that.  Is that enabled by default?
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Bruce Robertson  wrote:
>>
>>> Good point.
>>>
>>> On 09/06/2016 10:11 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd think that I would see some internal network activity if this were
>>> the case though.  Also, the source IPs appear to be from all over the world.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Bruce Robertson  wrote:
>>>
 In  my experience, that's usually your mobile devices nattering with
 the mother ship, like doing backups and uploading recent pictures. iPhones
 are especially bad about this.

 On 09/06/2016 09:57 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:

> So I've noticed some strange behavior on my home connection
> (Comcast).  The Mikrotik that I am using shows a constant Tx on the WAN
> port of around 3-5Mbps and between 200-300pps, Rx is just a few kbps.  
> This
> activity appears to be strictly on the WAN port.  If I disable a firewall
> rule that accepts input, the activity ceases - but devices behind the
> router lose connectivity.
>
> Any ideas?  I've got all IP services disabled except winbox, which is
> restricted to my local network.
> wbr>8!
>


>>> !DSPAM:2,57cef8d652678869110723!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Butt setts

[Rob Genovesi]

+1 Banjo.

And these are handy if you are working on 66-blocks a lot:
https://www.amazon.com/Siemon-TESTAR-2-Block-Adapter-2-Wire/dp/B00F3W7LES/



On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Chuck McCown  wrote:
> Banjo
> https://www.amazon.com/Paladin-Tools-1903-Modular-Adapter/dp/B6HYVQ
>
> -Original Message- From: Nate Burke
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 3:34 PM
>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Butt setts
>
> Do you carry an extra RJ11 cord then to plug in the butt set?  How do
> you connect the butt set to the ATA when the buttset has clips?
>
> On 8/28/2016 4:28 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but why carry both a butt set and a test phone? And test phones tend
>> to be awkward and get beat up.  Butt sets are meant to be dropped, tossed in
>> a van, etc.
>>
>> After a bug with Cisco ATA firmware several years back where they weren't
>> passing CID to the phone, I want to be able to test that at install time, or
>> troubleshoot if a customer claims they aren't getting CID info.  Some of
>> these old farmers have phones that are not CID capable.  Hell, I've had more
>> then one with a rotary dial phone who complained we couldn't handle pulse
>> dialing.
>>
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Nate Burke
>> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 1:22 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Butt setts
>>
>> I have only needed to use a buttset to test outgoing calls on POTS
>> lines.  When would you use it for incoming calls and need CID display?
>> If you're already to the point of taking incoming calls, wouldn't you
>> just plug a test handset into an RJ11?
>>
>> I've been very happy with this set
>> http://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=8136
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/28/2016 8:57 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>
>>> Make sure to get one with caller ID name & number display.
>>>
>>> -Original Message- From: Chuck McCown
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 4:10 AM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Butt setts
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/HARRIS-DRACON-DIVISION-M332-1-Linemans-Telephone-Phone-Line-Tester-BUTT-SET-/232058877606
>>>
>>> -Original Message- From: Chuck McCown
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 3:08 AM
>>> To: Animal Farm
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Butt setts
>>>
>>> I don't know if they still make them, but the Harris Dracon was a good
>>> one.
>>> More importantly are the clips.  You want the expensive clips that will
>>> go
>>> on a 66 block, but have bed of nails and the piercing pins.
>>> Speakerphone is good.  Nice heavy duty clip to clip on your belt to tool
>>> pouch is good.  Weatherproof is good.  Drop proof is good.  My first butt
>>> set was a 100% rubber BECO.  It would survive a drop from the top of a
>>> pole
>>> unless it fell with the dial against a rock.  Dial would move a little
>>> slow
>>> in sub zero weather and you would have to force it back.
>>>
>>> -Original Message- From: Jay Weekley
>>> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2016 9:37 PM
>>> To: Animal Farm
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] OT: Butt setts
>>>
>>> I'm looking for recommendations for butt sets for some upcoming jobs.
>>> Basically I need to get dial tone and and verify the number I am
>>> connected to but not sure of other features that may come with the
>>> higher end sets that may be helpful.
>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Netonix DC switch

[Rob Genovesi]

Yup.  It takes a wide range of DC input and will output 24v or 48v POE
depending on the configure.  Only ports 1-4 can do VH power (24 or
48).  We have had a few in the field for several months now and no
issues.

-Rob


On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Josh Luthman
 wrote:
> https://www.netonix.com/ws-12-250-dc.html
>
> Does this mean I can supply 24v and it will do 48v on ports I specify?!
> That sure is how it reads and it would be a complete dream if it would.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373

Re: [AFMUG] Convert Andrew Dragonwave dishes to N

[Rob Genovesi]

>From Gary-UBNT:

"We are working on data sheets right now so hopefully you will get more
questions answered shortly.  The reason for N connectors relates to demand
for higher mechanical robustness and the ability for the connectors to be
weather-proof as a stand alone connector (fully weatherproof gaskets and
the ability to accept larger diameter jumpers readily).  The N connectors
we use are rated to 18+ GHz."

An active thread on the UBNT forums right now, more available here:
http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber/Some-AF11X-details/td-p/1512145

-Rob


On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Bill Prince  wrote:

> I'm looking at all the other AF-nnX radios from UBNT, and they all use SMA
> connectors. What reason would they have to use N instead of SMA? Seems the
> SMA connector would have fewer issues at 11 GHz.
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Building small GPON network

[Rob Genovesi]

And miss out on this fun?  Hellz no



On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> There's an unsubscribe link in the headers.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Rob Genovesi <r...@corp.coastside.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> I am gaining all sorts of unexpected knowledge from this thread...
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Low hanging fruit. But more like getting ass hammered maybe.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, 12:34 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Is hamming fruit like a Hamming code?
>> >>
>> >> From: Lewis Bergman
>> >> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:29 PM
>> >> To: af@afmug.com
>> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Building small GPON network
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Damn. That was supposed to be self rape
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, 12:28 PM Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Wow. Not a single auto correct self tape on that and there were abunch
>> >>> of
>> >>> lew hamming fruit.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Building small GPON network

[Rob Genovesi]

I am gaining all sorts of unexpected knowledge from this thread...


On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Lewis Bergman  wrote:
> Low hanging fruit. But more like getting ass hammered maybe.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, 12:34 PM Ken Hohhof  wrote:
>>
>> Is hamming fruit like a Hamming code?
>>
>> From: Lewis Bergman
>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:29 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Building small GPON network
>>
>>
>> Damn. That was supposed to be self rape
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, 12:28 PM Lewis Bergman 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow. Not a single auto correct self tape on that and there were abunch of
>>> lew hamming fruit.
>>>
>>>

Re: [AFMUG] Building small GPON network

[Rob Genovesi]

I had been thinking in terms of a entry every 2-4 homes (drop cables from
entry directly to house on each side).  Seems excessive.

It does seem more managable if it's ~ 8 drops per entry.  The drop cable
may run alongside the feeder cable for X feet until it splits off to go to
the home?

-Rob


On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> Hours.  So you want to minimize the number of entries you do.
>
> *From:* Bruce Robertson <br...@pooh.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:28 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Building small GPON network
>
> That's what I was looking for, thanks.  How long does it typically take to
> insert that in the middle of a 144 count?  Looks like a job...
>
> On 06/16/2016 09:24 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Isn't that what these are for?
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Robertson <br...@pooh.com> wrote:
>
>> > With active, each strand has to run back to a switch somewhere.
>>
>> Right, I got that.  I'm talking mechanically on the pole, in front of the
>> house.  How do you suck their one fiber out of the 144 count  up on the
>> pole?
>>
>>
>> On 06/16/2016 09:22 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>
>> On gpon via a splitter. 1 fiber in, multiple fibers out. Can be on the
>> pole, in a pedestal, or even in the ground in a hand hole.
>>
>> With active, each strand has to run back to a switch somewhere.
>> On Jun 16, 2016 11:20 AM, "Bruce Robertson" <br...@pooh.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Noob question - mechanically, how do you break out an individual fiber
>>> outside the dwelling?
>>>
>>> On 06/16/2016 09:15 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>>
>>>> Something that small, run 144 count fiber, home run to each dwelling
>>>> and then choose active or PON back at your cabinet.
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message- From: Rob Genovesi
>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:14 AM
>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Building small GPON network
>>>>
>>>> We're looking at our first fiber neighborhood project, about 90 homes.
>>>> The neighborhood will be fed via wireless and fiber used for
>>>> distribution.  It's 100% aerial in remote private neighborhood.
>>>> Currently in the research/feasibility stage, but I hope this will be
>>>> our first build and a good project to cut our teeth on.
>>>>
>>>> A few questions, answer off-list if you prefer:
>>>>
>>>> - What OLT/ONT have people been using and liked for a small GPON
>>>> network?
>>>>
>>>> - Reading about "Distributed Tap Architecture" vs Splitting method.
>>>> Anyone have experience with Tap?
>>>>
>>>> - Armored or Dielectric?  100% aerial at the bottom of a canyon under
>>>> dense tree canopy.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure there will be more questions, thanks in advance for any
>>>> sharing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
>>>> 650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> !DSPAM:2,5762d2d4185131830565217!
>
>
>

[AFMUG] Building small GPON network

[Rob Genovesi]

We're looking at our first fiber neighborhood project, about 90 homes.
The neighborhood will be fed via wireless and fiber used for
distribution.  It's 100% aerial in remote private neighborhood.
Currently in the research/feasibility stage, but I hope this will be
our first build and a good project to cut our teeth on.

A few questions, answer off-list if you prefer:

- What OLT/ONT have people been using and liked for a small GPON network?

- Reading about "Distributed Tap Architecture" vs Splitting method.
Anyone have experience with Tap?

- Armored or Dielectric?  100% aerial at the bottom of a canyon under
dense tree canopy.

I'm sure there will be more questions, thanks in advance for any sharing.


Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA

Re: [AFMUG] Routed Gigabit Micro Repeater (Mimosa hardware)

[Rob Genovesi]

We use Altech Corp CBI243A:
http://www.alliedelec.com/altech-corp-cbi243a/70236398/

We're in a cool climate and the box is in a shaded area so we haven't
put vent/fans in (yet).  Probably a good idea to do so just to be
safe.


-Rob


On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Christopher Gray
<cg...@graytechsoftware.com> wrote:
> Rob,
>
> What are you using for your charger?
>
>
> 
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Rob Genovesi <r...@corp.coastside.net> wrote:
>>
>> Netonix switches have been great for us.  We're using the DC model
>> with a few batteries for backup.  The Netonix takes 9-60 VDC in and
>> can output 24V or 48V (configurable by port).  Perfect for powering a
>> 24V Mikrotik and a few 48V radios.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Christopher Gray
>> <cg...@graytechsoftware.com> wrote:
>> > For my routed 100 Mbps micro repeater sites I've been running MikroTik
>> > RB750P routers for both routing traffic and powering radios (With good
>> > results).
>> >
>> > I want to setup my first small routed 1 Gbps repeater site using 2x B5
>> > backhaul links and 1x A5 PtMP. What are others using to run a small
>> > routed
>> > site that runs 48V Gigabit radios?
>> >
>> > I'm considering a RB750G with a Netonix WS-6-MINI, but using a Netonix
>> > as a
>> > power injector seems a little overkill.
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Routed Gigabit Micro Repeater (Mimosa hardware)

[Rob Genovesi]

Netonix switches have been great for us.  We're using the DC model
with a few batteries for backup.  The Netonix takes 9-60 VDC in and
can output 24V or 48V (configurable by port).  Perfect for powering a
24V Mikrotik and a few 48V radios.

-Rob



On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Christopher Gray
 wrote:
> For my routed 100 Mbps micro repeater sites I've been running MikroTik
> RB750P routers for both routing traffic and powering radios (With good
> results).
>
> I want to setup my first small routed 1 Gbps repeater site using 2x B5
> backhaul links and 1x A5 PtMP. What are others using to run a small routed
> site that runs 48V Gigabit radios?
>
> I'm considering a RB750G with a Netonix WS-6-MINI, but using a Netonix as a
> power injector seems a little overkill.

Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa POE Injector

[Rob Genovesi]

+1 for Netonix switches, we use these at most of our POPs.


Rob Genovesi • Coastside.Net • Owner
650-712-5900 • 525B Obispo Rd • Half Moon Bay CA


On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:
> Best suggestion would be to use a netonix  switch 12-250 works very well.
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Matt" <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com>
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 4:35:28 PM
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Mimosa POE Injector
>
>> Looking at replacing some backhauls with Mimosa B5c units.  What is
>> everyone using for rack mount and DIN mount POE injectors?  I imagine
>> it has to be something 802.3at?

Re: [AFMUG] AF2X, AF3X, AF5X SNMP

[Rob Genovesi]

What cacti template are folks using for Ubiquiti 5.6.x gear these days?



On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:22 PM, SmarterBroadband <
li...@smarterbroadband.com> wrote:

> Yes please.
>
>
>
> And for epmp if you have one… J
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 04, 2015 11:21 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF2X, AF3X, AF5X SNMP
>
>
>
> I will try to remember to post a cacti host template here when I have one
> built for the AF5X, to save others the work of reinventing the wheel...
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Drive Testing

[Rob Genovesi]

If you want to roll your own you can use gpsd (http://www.catb.org/gpsd/)
to pull GPS data.  You could collate that with signal info pulled from the
bullet.

Kismet + gpsd was a popular option back in the day, however I don't think
the Kismet project has been kept active.

-Rob


On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

 I have to do a heat map too.  Perhaps a bullet would work with an omni,
 but still have to have software to correlate it with the GPS location etc.

 *From:* Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Friday, August 14, 2015 10:14 AM
 *To:* Animal Farm af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Drive Testing


 You have a truck and AC DC converter? Small mast and Nano station works
 well.   Just stop at key points .   remember when I first started testing
 Rocket 900s and I shared pictures of mast with Yagi's and m900 on mast on
 my red Silverado?  Some on list even made fun of me.  Didn't give a shit
 cause I was able to map out coverage area and get an accurate idea of range
 ,coverage and penetration.   I still do surveys that way using NS and
 Bullets with grid antennas.  I have a L bracket on my white Silverado for
 that purpose
 On Aug 14, 2015 9:12 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

 What is the best way to do drive testing to document AP coverage.  I need
 something that is very automated.  I  presume the vehicle would have to
 have an omni but they you would need to adjust the RX signal up by 20 dB to
 account for the use of a reflector.  Would need a 5 GHz receiver or
 spectrum analyzer that will measure down to –100 dBm I would think.

 Have never been involved in something like this.  I  have used SMs for
 this but they are directional and not automated.

[AFMUG] Municipal conduit agreement

[Rob Genovesi]

Hi all,

Does anyone have a boilerplate/sample agreement for use of municipal
conduit?  I'm looking specifically for cases where the agreement is
for empty conduit (we put in our own fiber).

We have a small town that has about 8 blocks of conduit, so it
shouldn't need be anything too elaborate.

Thanks in advance,

Rob Genovesi
Coastside.Net
650-712-5900

Re: [AFMUG] Cisco pissing me off

[Rob Genovesi]

You may be missing this cmd: switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

interface FastEthernet 0/3
  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 777
  switchport mode trunk


-Rob


On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote:

 This should be a trivial Cisco switch question. Apparently I don't use
 these turds enough to remember everything.

 show config says:

 interface FastEthernet0/3
 switchport access vlan 777
 switchport mode access
 speed 100
 duplex full
 no cdp enable
 !

 However, when trying to convert it to a tagged port with the following
 commands, it doesn't change.

 config terminal
 int Fa0/3
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 777

 No errors, just no change. I even tried just setting the description. Same
 result.

 I also tried removing the vlan via:

 interface FastEthernet 0/3
 no switchport mode access
 no switchport access vlan 777



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

Re: [AFMUG] Looks like a great deal on a backup gen

[Rob Genovesi]

It says it's CARB approved for all 50 states (and national parks):
http://portablegeneratorguide.com/duromax-xp4850eh-dual-fuel-review/

Steve - are you able to do remote start/stop through PacketFlux?


-Rob


On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:

 Can't be sold in California.  It doesn't meet that CARB garbage so the
 rest of the country can benefit.


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:

 Did a container fall off a boat?

 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, SmarterBroadband 
 li...@smarterbroadband.com wrote:

 I did order one.

 Adam



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Utick
 *Sent:* Monday, April 27, 2015 5:35 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looks like a great deal on a backup gen



 We've got almost that exact same generator at one of our solar sites
 hooked up to a PacketFlux Generator controller for backup power in the
 event we don't have enough solar.   Has been running great there so far.



 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:52 PM, SmarterBroadband 
 li...@smarterbroadband.com wrote:


 http://www.ebay.com/itm/DuroMax-XP4850EH-Hybrid-Portable-Dual-Fuel-Propane-Gas-Camping-RV-Generator/171503114601?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item27ee61d969



 Adam