Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-27 Thread Chuck McCown via Af
I dislike diesel due to the inevitable mess and the fact it goes stale, has 
cold weather issues etc.
If the disaster is bad enough to shut off the NG pipes, I think I don't want 
to be at work.


-Original Message- 
From: Rex-List Account via Af

Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 5:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

Just to throw another curve into your thinking - what is your reasoning on 
the generator? Disaster recovery? Frequent power outages due to storms and 
such?
As a thirty plus year vet at a phone company and a twenty five plus year vet 
on the fire department let me give you this to ponder. If it is for frequent 
power outages
due to electrical storms, ice, and/or poor power lines then NG is fine. 
However it has been my experience that in disaster scenarios like 
earthquakes (ok I haven't actually
seen this one) severe storms/tornadoes (I have seen way too many of these) 
then one of the first things the fire department does is shut down the 
natural gas pipelines.
Too many houses destroyed and the possibilities of way too many leaks. I 
personally would go with diesel fuel. Almost always available - can be 
easily trucked in. LP can be
hard to source and price fluctuates in the winter. There is always a farmer 
or construction company around with diesel. NG is defiantly more convenient, 
but in a true disaster

situation it may not be available. Just my two cents worth.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber 
Broadcasting) via Af

Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac 
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but those 
are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building is really 
old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming in. And I do 
have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility closets. The two 
services is actually nice because a lot of times, one side will have power 
when the other doesn't. One comes from the north, the other from the south.


There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service feed. 
I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two auto-transfer 
switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on both sides. 
Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I thought I'd ask 
here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay someone to come up 
with something that I most likely wouldn't like.




Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-27 Thread Mike Hammett via Af
I believe they make treatments to reduce the staleness of stored diesel. 
You'll also be burning some during your regularly scheduled load tests as well, 
right? *nudge* ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 8:28:57 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question 

I dislike diesel due to the inevitable mess and the fact it goes stale, has 
cold weather issues etc. 
If the disaster is bad enough to shut off the NG pipes, I think I don't want 
to be at work. 

-Original Message- 
From: Rex-List Account via Af 
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 5:32 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question 

Just to throw another curve into your thinking - what is your reasoning on 
the generator? Disaster recovery? Frequent power outages due to storms and 
such? 
As a thirty plus year vet at a phone company and a twenty five plus year vet 
on the fire department let me give you this to ponder. If it is for frequent 
power outages 
due to electrical storms, ice, and/or poor power lines then NG is fine. 
However it has been my experience that in disaster scenarios like 
earthquakes (ok I haven't actually 
seen this one) severe storms/tornadoes (I have seen way too many of these) 
then one of the first things the fire department does is shut down the 
natural gas pipelines. 
Too many houses destroyed and the possibilities of way too many leaks. I 
personally would go with diesel fuel. Almost always available - can be 
easily trucked in. LP can be 
hard to source and price fluctuates in the winter. There is always a farmer 
or construction company around with diesel. NG is defiantly more convenient, 
but in a true disaster 
situation it may not be available. Just my two cents worth. 

Rex 

-Original Message- 
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber 
Broadcasting) via Af 
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:17 PM 
To: Animal Farm 
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question 

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac 
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but those 
are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building is really 
old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming in. And I do 
have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility closets. The two 
services is actually nice because a lot of times, one side will have power 
when the other doesn't. One comes from the north, the other from the south. 

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service feed. 
I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two auto-transfer 
switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on both sides. 
Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I thought I'd ask 
here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay someone to come up 
with something that I most likely wouldn't like. 




Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-27 Thread Adam Moffett via Af


That only goes so far.  There's a site near here with a huge diesel 
tank.  I don't know the specs of the generator, but it's backup for a 
35,000 Watt FM station.so in any case it's very big.  I heard they 
have to run it for 24 hours each month in order to burn enough fuel to 
make room for fresh fuel so they don't go stale.


I'm sure somebody did the math and decided this was worth it, but they 
must be burning 100 gallons per month for no better reason than to make 
room for fresh fuel.


I believe they make treatments to reduce the staleness of stored 
diesel. You'll also be burning some during your regularly scheduled 
load tests as well, right? *nudge*  ;-)




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL


*From: *Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Monday, October 27, 2014 8:28:57 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

I dislike diesel due to the inevitable mess and the fact it goes 
stale, has

cold weather issues etc.
If the disaster is bad enough to shut off the NG pipes, I think I 
don't want

to be at work.

-Original Message-
From: Rex-List Account via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 5:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

Just to throw another curve into your thinking - what is your 
reasoning on
the generator? Disaster recovery? Frequent power outages due to storms 
and

such?
As a thirty plus year vet at a phone company and a twenty five plus 
year vet
on the fire department let me give you this to ponder. If it is for 
frequent

power outages
due to electrical storms, ice, and/or poor power lines then NG is fine.
However it has been my experience that in disaster scenarios like
earthquakes (ok I haven't actually
seen this one) severe storms/tornadoes (I have seen way too many of 
these)

then one of the first things the fire department does is shut down the
natural gas pipelines.
Too many houses destroyed and the possibilities of way too many leaks. I
personally would go with diesel fuel. Almost always available - can be
easily trucked in. LP can be
hard to source and price fluctuates in the winter. There is always a 
farmer
or construction company around with diesel. NG is defiantly more 
convenient,

but in a true disaster
situation it may not be available. Just my two cents worth.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber
Broadcasting) via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but those
are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building is 
really
old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming in. And 
I do

have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility closets. The two
services is actually nice because a lot of times, one side will have 
power
when the other doesn't. One comes from the north, the other from the 
south.


There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service 
feed.
I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two 
auto-transfer

switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on both sides.
Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I thought I'd ask
here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay someone to 
come up

with something that I most likely wouldn't like.






Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-27 Thread Chuck McCown via Af
Yeahbut, your tests are generally once a week for 15 minutes, without load.  
You might burn a gallon of fuel.  If you have a 1500 gallon tank, that is a lot 
of weeks (28 years...) worth of test runs.  Even a 500 gallon tank would last 
almost 10 years on test runs along.  Yes, they come along and top it off a 
couple of times a year but that does not do much to dilute the bad fuel with 
new.  

There are microbes that eat diesel.  Not sure if the additives kill them 
completely or not.  
It must work because lots of large telecom sites have diesel tanks.  I have 
always been LP or NG if I could get it.  

From: Mike Hammett via Af 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 7:36 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

I believe they make treatments to reduce the staleness of stored diesel. 
You'll also be burning some during your regularly scheduled load tests as well, 
right?  *nudge*  ;-)




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com







From: Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 8:28:57 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

I dislike diesel due to the inevitable mess and the fact it goes stale, has 
cold weather issues etc.
If the disaster is bad enough to shut off the NG pipes, I think I don't want 
to be at work.

-Original Message- 
From: Rex-List Account via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 5:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

Just to throw another curve into your thinking - what is your reasoning on 
the generator? Disaster recovery? Frequent power outages due to storms and 
such?
As a thirty plus year vet at a phone company and a twenty five plus year vet 
on the fire department let me give you this to ponder. If it is for frequent 
power outages
due to electrical storms, ice, and/or poor power lines then NG is fine. 
However it has been my experience that in disaster scenarios like 
earthquakes (ok I haven't actually
seen this one) severe storms/tornadoes (I have seen way too many of these) 
then one of the first things the fire department does is shut down the 
natural gas pipelines.
Too many houses destroyed and the possibilities of way too many leaks. I 
personally would go with diesel fuel. Almost always available - can be 
easily trucked in. LP can be
hard to source and price fluctuates in the winter. There is always a farmer 
or construction company around with diesel. NG is defiantly more convenient, 
but in a true disaster
situation it may not be available. Just my two cents worth.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber 
Broadcasting) via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac 
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but those 
are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building is really 
old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming in. And I do 
have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility closets. The two 
services is actually nice because a lot of times, one side will have power 
when the other doesn't. One comes from the north, the other from the south.

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service feed. 
I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two auto-transfer 
switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on both sides. 
Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I thought I'd ask 
here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay someone to come up 
with something that I most likely wouldn't like.




Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-27 Thread Mike Hammett via Af
How useful is a test run without load? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 8:48:34 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question 




Yeahbut, your tests are generally once a week for 15 minutes, without load. You 
might burn a gallon of fuel. If you have a 1500 gallon tank, that is a lot of 
weeks (28 years...) worth of test runs. Even a 500 gallon tank would last 
almost 10 years on test runs along. Yes, they come along and top it off a 
couple of times a year but that does not do much to dilute the bad fuel with 
new. 

There are microbes that eat diesel. Not sure if the additives kill them 
completely or not. 
It must work because lots of large telecom sites have diesel tanks. I have 
always been LP or NG if I could get it. 




From: Mike Hammett via Af 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 7:36 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question 


I believe they make treatments to reduce the staleness of stored diesel. 
You'll also be burning some during your regularly scheduled load tests as well, 
right? *nudge* ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 8:28:57 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question 

I dislike diesel due to the inevitable mess and the fact it goes stale, has 
cold weather issues etc. 
If the disaster is bad enough to shut off the NG pipes, I think I don't want 
to be at work. 

-Original Message- 
From: Rex-List Account via Af 
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 5:32 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question 

Just to throw another curve into your thinking - what is your reasoning on 
the generator? Disaster recovery? Frequent power outages due to storms and 
such? 
As a thirty plus year vet at a phone company and a twenty five plus year vet 
on the fire department let me give you this to ponder. If it is for frequent 
power outages 
due to electrical storms, ice, and/or poor power lines then NG is fine. 
However it has been my experience that in disaster scenarios like 
earthquakes (ok I haven't actually 
seen this one) severe storms/tornadoes (I have seen way too many of these) 
then one of the first things the fire department does is shut down the 
natural gas pipelines. 
Too many houses destroyed and the possibilities of way too many leaks. I 
personally would go with diesel fuel. Almost always available - can be 
easily trucked in. LP can be 
hard to source and price fluctuates in the winter. There is always a farmer 
or construction company around with diesel. NG is defiantly more convenient, 
but in a true disaster 
situation it may not be available. Just my two cents worth. 

Rex 

-Original Message- 
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber 
Broadcasting) via Af 
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:17 PM 
To: Animal Farm 
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question 

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac 
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but those 
are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building is really 
old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming in. And I do 
have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility closets. The two 
services is actually nice because a lot of times, one side will have power 
when the other doesn't. One comes from the north, the other from the south. 

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service feed. 
I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two auto-transfer 
switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on both sides. 
Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I thought I'd ask 
here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay someone to come up 
with something that I most likely wouldn't like. 





Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-27 Thread Chuck McCown via Af
Half useful.  And that half is the less useful half.  

I like the guys to kill the power and see the whole thing work a couple of 
times a year.  They are always reticent to do so.  “Something might not work!”

From: Mike Hammett via Af 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 7:50 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

How useful is a test run without load?




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com







From: Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 8:48:34 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question


Yeahbut, your tests are generally once a week for 15 minutes, without load.  
You might burn a gallon of fuel.  If you have a 1500 gallon tank, that is a lot 
of weeks (28 years...) worth of test runs.  Even a 500 gallon tank would last 
almost 10 years on test runs along.  Yes, they come along and top it off a 
couple of times a year but that does not do much to dilute the bad fuel with 
new.  

There are microbes that eat diesel.  Not sure if the additives kill them 
completely or not.  
It must work because lots of large telecom sites have diesel tanks.  I have 
always been LP or NG if I could get it.  

From: Mike Hammett via Af 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 7:36 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

I believe they make treatments to reduce the staleness of stored diesel. 
You'll also be burning some during your regularly scheduled load tests as well, 
right?  *nudge*  ;-)




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com







From: Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 8:28:57 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

I dislike diesel due to the inevitable mess and the fact it goes stale, has 
cold weather issues etc.
If the disaster is bad enough to shut off the NG pipes, I think I don't want 
to be at work.

-Original Message- 
From: Rex-List Account via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 5:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

Just to throw another curve into your thinking - what is your reasoning on 
the generator? Disaster recovery? Frequent power outages due to storms and 
such?
As a thirty plus year vet at a phone company and a twenty five plus year vet 
on the fire department let me give you this to ponder. If it is for frequent 
power outages
due to electrical storms, ice, and/or poor power lines then NG is fine. 
However it has been my experience that in disaster scenarios like 
earthquakes (ok I haven't actually
seen this one) severe storms/tornadoes (I have seen way too many of these) 
then one of the first things the fire department does is shut down the 
natural gas pipelines.
Too many houses destroyed and the possibilities of way too many leaks. I 
personally would go with diesel fuel. Almost always available - can be 
easily trucked in. LP can be
hard to source and price fluctuates in the winter. There is always a farmer 
or construction company around with diesel. NG is defiantly more convenient, 
but in a true disaster
situation it may not be available. Just my two cents worth.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber 
Broadcasting) via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac 
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but those 
are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building is really 
old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming in. And I do 
have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility closets. The two 
services is actually nice because a lot of times, one side will have power 
when the other doesn't. One comes from the north, the other from the south.

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service feed. 
I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two auto-transfer 
switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on both sides. 
Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I thought I'd ask 
here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay someone to come up 
with something that I most likely wouldn't like.





Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-27 Thread Mark Radabaugh via Af
The big guys take care of the diesel tanks by either running their own 
filtration/conditioning system or having a contractor come out every 
couple of months and process the fuel through a polishing system.Not 
cheap but necessary with diesel standby systems.


Mark


On 10/27/14, 9:48 AM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:
Yeahbut, your tests are generally once a week for 15 minutes, without 
load.  You might burn a gallon of fuel.  If you have a 1500 gallon 
tank, that is a lot of weeks (28 years...) worth of test runs.  Even a 
500 gallon tank would last almost 10 years on test runs along.  Yes, 
they come along and top it off a couple of times a year but that does 
not do much to dilute the bad fuel with new.
There are microbes that eat diesel.  Not sure if the additives kill 
them completely or not.
It must work because lots of large telecom sites have diesel tanks.  I 
have always been LP or NG if I could get it.

*From:* Mike Hammett via Af mailto:af@afmug.com
*Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2014 7:36 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Generator question
I believe they make treatments to reduce the staleness of stored 
diesel. You'll also be burning some during your regularly scheduled 
load tests as well, right?  *nudge*  ;-)




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL


*From: *Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Monday, October 27, 2014 8:28:57 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

I dislike diesel due to the inevitable mess and the fact it goes 
stale, has

cold weather issues etc.
If the disaster is bad enough to shut off the NG pipes, I think I 
don't want

to be at work.

-Original Message-
From: Rex-List Account via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 5:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

Just to throw another curve into your thinking - what is your 
reasoning on
the generator? Disaster recovery? Frequent power outages due to storms 
and

such?
As a thirty plus year vet at a phone company and a twenty five plus 
year vet
on the fire department let me give you this to ponder. If it is for 
frequent

power outages
due to electrical storms, ice, and/or poor power lines then NG is fine.
However it has been my experience that in disaster scenarios like
earthquakes (ok I haven't actually
seen this one) severe storms/tornadoes (I have seen way too many of 
these)

then one of the first things the fire department does is shut down the
natural gas pipelines.
Too many houses destroyed and the possibilities of way too many leaks. I
personally would go with diesel fuel. Almost always available - can be
easily trucked in. LP can be
hard to source and price fluctuates in the winter. There is always a 
farmer
or construction company around with diesel. NG is defiantly more 
convenient,

but in a true disaster
situation it may not be available. Just my two cents worth.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber
Broadcasting) via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but those
are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building is 
really
old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming in. And 
I do

have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility closets. The two
services is actually nice because a lot of times, one side will have 
power
when the other doesn't. One comes from the north, the other from the 
south.


There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service 
feed.
I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two 
auto-transfer

switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on both sides.
Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I thought I'd ask
here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay someone to 
come up

with something that I most likely wouldn't like.




--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex

m...@amplex.net  419.837.5015 x 1021



Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-27 Thread Bill Prince via Af
I'd probably put in two transfer switches.  One at the main panel at 
each building.


Then run the output from the generator to each of the transfer switches.

The only issue is if the power is out at one building, but not the 
other.  That's probably a utility issue, but no harm either way. The 
whole point of the transfer switch is to avoid the hazard of 
back-feeding the utility from the generator.


bp

On 10/26/2014 2:17 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote:
So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac 
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but 
those are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our 
building is really old and is split in half with two separate 240 
services coming in. And I do have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between 
the two utility closets. The two services is actually nice because a 
lot of times, one side will have power when the other doesn't. One 
comes from the north, the other from the south.


There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service 
feed. I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two 
auto-transfer switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run 
on both sides. Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but 
I thought I'd ask here for suggestions before we go down that road and 
pay someone to come up with something that I most likely wouldn't like.






[AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af
So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac 
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but 
those are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building 
is really old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming 
in. And I do have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility 
closets. The two services is actually nice because a lot of times, one 
side will have power when the other doesn't. One comes from the north, 
the other from the south.


There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service 
feed. I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two 
auto-transfer switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on 
both sides. Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I 
thought I'd ask here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay 
someone to come up with something that I most likely wouldn't like.


Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread Chuck McCown via Af
You could put in the transfer switch that comes with the generator and 
connect it up as normal for one of the feeds, then add a slave transfer 
relay that would operate with the following two conditions:


1)Mains voltage of second feed is zero.
2)Voltage out of the generator is not zero.

Feed the slave from the input of the generac transfer switch.

It would take some additional puzzling to  figure out how to force the 
generator to run when the second feed only is down.  I am sure it can be 
done.


You could have a relay between the meter and the transfer switch of feed 1 
that would cut feed 1 if feed 2 died.  That would force everything to start 
and run.  Cheap and dirty.  Inefficient but it would work.  I am sure  there 
is  a better way.


-Original Message- 
From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af

Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 3:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but
those are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building
is really old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming
in. And I do have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility
closets. The two services is actually nice because a lot of times, one
side will have power when the other doesn't. One comes from the north,
the other from the south.

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service
feed. I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two
auto-transfer switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on
both sides. Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I
thought I'd ask here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay
someone to come up with something that I most likely wouldn't like. 



Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread Ken Hohhof via Af
There should be a way to make that work.  But if the equipment in one 
building only draws a modest amount of power, could you put in something 
like an APC or Tripp-Lite automatic transfer switch, and connect one input 
to power from the other building AFTER the transfer switch, making this 
input the secondary?  That way you don't have to worry about starting the 
generator, you just use commercial power from the other building if it's 
available, otherwise the other building takes care of starting the generator 
and transferring power to it.


-Original Message- 
From: Chuck McCown via Af

Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

You could put in the transfer switch that comes with the generator and
connect it up as normal for one of the feeds, then add a slave transfer
relay that would operate with the following two conditions:

1)Mains voltage of second feed is zero.
2)Voltage out of the generator is not zero.

Feed the slave from the input of the generac transfer switch.

It would take some additional puzzling to  figure out how to force the
generator to run when the second feed only is down.  I am sure it can be
done.

You could have a relay between the meter and the transfer switch of feed 1
that would cut feed 1 if feed 2 died.  That would force everything to start
and run.  Cheap and dirty.  Inefficient but it would work.  I am sure  there
is  a better way.

-Original Message- 
From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af

Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 3:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but
those are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building
is really old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming
in. And I do have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility
closets. The two services is actually nice because a lot of times, one
side will have power when the other doesn't. One comes from the north,
the other from the south.

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service
feed. I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two
auto-transfer switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on
both sides. Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I
thought I'd ask here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay
someone to come up with something that I most likely wouldn't like.




Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread Seth Mattinen via Af

On 10/26/14, 14:17, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote:

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but
those are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building
is really old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming
in. And I do have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility
closets. The two services is actually nice because a lot of times, one
side will have power when the other doesn't. One comes from the north,
the other from the south.

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service
feed. I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two
auto-transfer switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on
both sides. Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I
thought I'd ask here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay
someone to come up with something that I most likely wouldn't like.




Feed a panelboard that subfeeds multiple transfer switches. Use switches 
that are two wire start signal and a generator that accepts a two wire 
start signal. Parallel the start connections. They'll switch 
independently. Pretty common and straightforward thing. I'm feeding 
three on a bus. If any one of the three want to go to emergency it will 
and the other two will do whatever they think is right, too. Don't do 
anything dumb like trying to come up with logic that depends on the others.


~Seth


Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af
Exactly my thought, which is why I brought this up. So maybe a master 
switch feeding two sub switches? But I need either or both sides to be 
able to tell the generator I need power.


On 10/26/2014 5:11 PM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:
Those generacs have lots of interconnections between the transfer 
switch and the generator.  They may be able to do a two wire start, 
but I would not count on it.  I have installed lots of  them and it 
seems like there is about 8 control wire.


-Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:06 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

On 10/26/14, 14:17, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote:

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but
those are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building
is really old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming
in. And I do have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility
closets. The two services is actually nice because a lot of times, one
side will have power when the other doesn't. One comes from the north,
the other from the south.

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service
feed. I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two
auto-transfer switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on
both sides. Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I
thought I'd ask here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay
someone to come up with something that I most likely wouldn't like.




Feed a panelboard that subfeeds multiple transfer switches. Use switches
that are two wire start signal and a generator that accepts a two wire
start signal. Parallel the start connections. They'll switch
independently. Pretty common and straightforward thing. I'm feeding
three on a bus. If any one of the three want to go to emergency it will
and the other two will do whatever they think is right, too. Don't do
anything dumb like trying to come up with logic that depends on the 
others.


~Seth




Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread Seth Mattinen via Af

On 10/26/14, 15:11, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:

Those generacs have lots of interconnections between the transfer switch
and the generator.  They may be able to do a two wire start, but I would
not count on it.  I have installed lots of  them and it seems like there
is about 8 control wire.



I would say such a generator is the wrong tool for this kind of job if 
it can't handle a two wire start signal.


Here's a crappy 30-second one line diagram for a normal situation. But I 
also don't use generators that mandate some proprietary transfer switch. 
The last thing I'll say on this topic is to avoid ghetto hack solutions 
or utility-to-utility transfers, because it really is straightforward 
(and safe) with the right tools for the job. If you want to hack 
something and are dead set on Generac, then hack it to come up with a 
universal two wire contact closure start input, not everything else 
around it.


~Seth


Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af
I said I wasn't dead set on the Generac. Only thing is, 1800RPM is cool 
and quiet. We have houses and other businesses around that don't want to 
hear an 18 wheeler running full bore all night long. And we have a 6x3' 
pad poured already, biggest we could fit.


On 10/26/2014 5:49 PM, Seth Mattinen via Af wrote:

On 10/26/14, 15:11, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:

Those generacs have lots of interconnections between the transfer switch
and the generator.  They may be able to do a two wire start, but I would
not count on it.  I have installed lots of  them and it seems like there
is about 8 control wire.



I would say such a generator is the wrong tool for this kind of job if 
it can't handle a two wire start signal.


Here's a crappy 30-second one line diagram for a normal situation. But 
I also don't use generators that mandate some proprietary transfer 
switch. The last thing I'll say on this topic is to avoid ghetto hack 
solutions or utility-to-utility transfers, because it really is 
straightforward (and safe) with the right tools for the job. If you 
want to hack something and are dead set on Generac, then hack it to 
come up with a universal two wire contact closure start input, not 
everything else around it.


~Seth




Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af
That's the problem, both sides have stuff that needs to be on and are 
not insignificant loads. Both are 200A panels. On the north side there's 
the server room, telephone/office network closet, my desk (must have 
power!), boss' office, bookkeeper's office and the receptionist desk up 
front. Plus some hallway lights and stuff. The south half has offices 
and cubicles that must be on, which is probably the most critical 
because they answer the phones, but they can't do that if the stuff on 
the north side isn't up. This is also the side that has the tower and 
generator pad.


So I guess on the south side, just install the transfer switch there and 
transfer that whole panel. Then run say a 50 or 60A circuit over to the 
north side that has its own simple auto transfer switch of some kind and 
put only the circuits on it that I need? Then the south panel should 
always be energized, either utility or gen. Yeah, Ken you're probably 
right, maybe I'm over-thinking this and that's the easier way to go.


Right now I have two Tripp-Lite 3kVA UPS's in the main rack. Both are 
110v L5-30 input. Not all of the servers, switches, routers, etc. have 
dual power supplies, but I can fix that either by replacement at some 
point or an ATS. So one UPS on the backed up feed and the other not and 
let it shut down. We're pulling under 1500 watts in the server room when 
the UPS's are charged.


On 10/26/2014 5:06 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af wrote:
There should be a way to make that work.  But if the equipment in one 
building only draws a modest amount of power, could you put in 
something like an APC or Tripp-Lite automatic transfer switch, and 
connect one input to power from the other building AFTER the transfer 
switch, making this input the secondary?  That way you don't have to 
worry about starting the generator, you just use commercial power from 
the other building if it's available, otherwise the other building 
takes care of starting the generator and transferring power to it.


-Original Message- From: Chuck McCown via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

You could put in the transfer switch that comes with the generator and
connect it up as normal for one of the feeds, then add a slave transfer
relay that would operate with the following two conditions:

1)Mains voltage of second feed is zero.
2)Voltage out of the generator is not zero.

Feed the slave from the input of the generac transfer switch.

It would take some additional puzzling to  figure out how to force the
generator to run when the second feed only is down.  I am sure it can be
done.

You could have a relay between the meter and the transfer switch of 
feed 1
that would cut feed 1 if feed 2 died.  That would force everything to 
start
and run.  Cheap and dirty.  Inefficient but it would work.  I am sure  
there

is  a better way.

-Original Message- From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
via Af

Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 3:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but
those are very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building
is really old and is split in half with two separate 240 services coming
in. And I do have an old empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility
closets. The two services is actually nice because a lot of times, one
side will have power when the other doesn't. One comes from the north,
the other from the south.

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service
feed. I'm trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two
auto-transfer switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on
both sides. Probably need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I
thought I'd ask here for suggestions before we go down that road and pay
someone to come up with something that I most likely wouldn't like.






Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread Rex-List Account via Af
Just to throw another curve into your thinking - what is your reasoning on the 
generator? Disaster recovery? Frequent power outages due to storms and such?
As a thirty plus year vet at a phone company and a twenty five plus year vet on 
the fire department let me give you this to ponder. If it is for frequent power 
outages
due to electrical storms, ice, and/or poor power lines then NG is fine. However 
it has been my experience that in disaster scenarios like earthquakes (ok I 
haven't actually 
seen this one) severe storms/tornadoes (I have seen way too many of these) then 
one of the first things the fire department does is shut down the natural gas 
pipelines.
Too many houses destroyed and the possibilities of way too many leaks. I 
personally would go with diesel fuel. Almost always available - can be easily 
trucked in. LP can be
hard to source and price fluctuates in the winter. There is always a farmer or 
construction company around with diesel. NG is defiantly more convenient, but 
in a true disaster
situation it may not be available. Just my two cents worth.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber 
Broadcasting) via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac 
QuietSource 22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but those are 
very nice and quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building is really old and 
is split in half with two separate 240 services coming in. And I do have an old 
empty 1-1/4 conduit between the two utility closets. The two services is 
actually nice because a lot of times, one side will have power when the other 
doesn't. One comes from the north, the other from the south.

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service feed. I'm 
trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two auto-transfer 
switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on both sides. Probably 
need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I thought I'd ask here for 
suggestions before we go down that road and pay someone to come up with 
something that I most likely wouldn't like.



Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread Seth Mattinen via Af

On 10/26/14, 3:56 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote:

I said I wasn't dead set on the Generac. Only thing is, 1800RPM is cool
and quiet. We have houses and other businesses around that don't want to
hear an 18 wheeler running full bore all night long. And we have a 6x3'
pad poured already, biggest we could fit.



Ah yes, you did say gas. I'm all diesel and thus 1800 RPM is normal.

~Seth


Re: [AFMUG] Generator question

2014-10-26 Thread George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af
Yes, standby for utility outages from storms. We have never had gas shut 
down. Not even after the tornado last year. Not saying it's impossible. 
If it happened, I could run the most absolutely critical stuff off of a 
portable generator and propane tank.


On 10/26/2014 6:32 PM, Rex-List Account via Af wrote:

Just to throw another curve into your thinking - what is your reasoning on the 
generator? Disaster recovery? Frequent power outages due to storms and such?
As a thirty plus year vet at a phone company and a twenty five plus year vet on 
the fire department let me give you this to ponder. If it is for frequent power 
outages
due to electrical storms, ice, and/or poor power lines then NG is fine. However 
it has been my experience that in disaster scenarios like earthquakes (ok I 
haven't actually
seen this one) severe storms/tornadoes (I have seen way too many of these) then 
one of the first things the fire department does is shut down the natural gas 
pipelines.
Too many houses destroyed and the possibilities of way too many leaks. I 
personally would go with diesel fuel. Almost always available - can be easily 
trucked in. LP can be
hard to source and price fluctuates in the winter. There is always a farmer or 
construction company around with diesel. NG is defiantly more convenient, but 
in a true disaster
situation it may not be available. Just my two cents worth.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber 
Broadcasting) via Af
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:17 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Generator question

So I have a unique situation at our office. We're looking at a Generac QuietSource 
22 or 30kW running on NG. I'm not dead set on that, but those are very nice and 
quiet 1800RPM. And the problem is, our building is really old and is split in half 
with two separate 240 services coming in. And I do have an old empty 1-1/4 
conduit between the two utility closets. The two services is actually nice because a 
lot of times, one side will have power when the other doesn't. One comes from the 
north, the other from the south.

There's no way we can rewire and combine everything into one service feed. I'm 
trying to wrap my mind around how to do something like two auto-transfer 
switches on one generator. I have critical stuff to run on both sides. Probably 
need a qualified electrician or engineer, but I thought I'd ask here for 
suggestions before we go down that road and pay someone to come up with 
something that I most likely wouldn't like.