Re: [AMRadio] Rinaldo to RETIRE !!!

2008-05-29 Thread W6OM
Its really a cheap circus with bad clowns and has been so for a long 
time.  Have you ever met some of their Regional Directors, hardly the 
kind of people who inspire confident and trust. 

I keep my membership active so I can pound on them every week 
concerning their gross mismanagement.


Cheers

Ron  W6OM




E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322)
Database version: 5.09940e
http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Rinaldo to RETIRE !!!

2008-05-29 Thread W6OM
I stand corrected, thank you sir, I inadvertently used the wrong title, 
but the observation stands.


I have met many of the ARRL Directors and remain underwhelmed.The 
term director in the corporate world (The ARRL is  Corporation) is 
reserved for individuals of high achievement in business and commerce 
when we don't have an officer position for them.


Cheers

Ron  W6OM




E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322)
Database version: 5.09940e
http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Fw: [AMRadio] Dummy Load

2008-05-15 Thread W6OM



Rick

I use a Navy Surplus Bird Professional Broadcast Dummy Load with a built 
in watt meter rated at 1KW forever.  I use it frequently to tweak the 
Gates BC-500T for 160 meters or the Bauer 707 for 75 meters.


There are numerous surplus houses around the country that sell them and 
depending on your pocket book can range from $250 to $1,500.  I paid 
$289.00 for mine last year and it runs cool when I put either one of the 
Big Boxes into it.


Email me directly and I'll send you a digital photo, P/N and the name of 
the place I bought it.


All the Best

Ron Weaver  W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om

www.california-am.com











- Original Message - 
From: Rick Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service' 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:34 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] Dummy Load


I know this has been beaten to death many times, but for the sake of an 
old
man with a bad memory could we discuss the most economical (very 
important)

way to provide a dummy load for testing a broadcast transmitter.  I have a
few Cantennas, but they get hot real quick at 1000 watts and I'd like
something I could be a little more confident in.  If I were to use the
proper number of series/parallel non-inductive resistors at say 100 watts
each, what kind of support system would be best to insure at least a one
minute key down time?  Would immersing them in oil or attaching them to 
heat

dissipating metal with a blower be the better choice?



Thanks for any and all advice you may offer..



Rick/K5IAR

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.




E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.0.212)
Database version: 5.09840
http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ 






E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.0.212)
Database version: 5.09840
http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] ARRL, Right or Wrong

2008-04-24 Thread w6om

Ladies and Gentlemen, please take the time to pull down the ARRL's annual 
financial report, read the numbers and then you will understand.
1. The ARRL is a publishing Company and derives a significant percentage of it 
annual operating revenue from the sale of books.
2. The ARRL is also a CO-OP advertising channel for manufactures of 
communications equipment.
3. The ARRL is a lobby group which spends exhorbitant amounts of money on 
travel to IARU functions.
4. The ARRL is also a lobby group with paid legal counsel to the FCC.
We may have been the reason the organization was founded, but we are held in 
contempt when we raise any significant question or issue with them.
5. We are small potatos to them, the individual Ham no longer has significance 
to the ARRL.
6. All this while Sumner takes his $150K annual salary plus travel expense and 
bonuses.
Summary:
Publication of more books leads to a larger market share, which attracts more 
CO-OP dollars from the manufacturers which underwrites the lobby efforts with 
the IARU and FCC.
The Lobby efforts attract more manufactures which want more spectrum to sell 
more equipment.
The By Laws are very simple and clear, if we don't like it, we can petition to 
recall many of them, but alas, it seems we prefer to vent, instead of take 
action.

Ron Weaver - W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Anonymous QST Author suggests that Part 97 requires6kHzAM Bandwidth Limit

2008-04-18 Thread W6OM
A standard practice in any business, school, government or relationship is
to never respond to anonymous comments.  Once you do they have control of
you and you will never know where it is coming from, regardless of the
topic.  Anyone of integrity, character and courage will sign their name to
such comments, others wise its invalid input and just meant to stir a quiet
pot.

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Crawford
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 7:13 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Anonymous QST Author suggests that Part 97
requires6kHzAM Bandwidth Limit 

Don K4KYV hasn't been back on the forum, so I will say that he has a 3400 Hz

filter in his audio chain that has a sharp cutoff right at 3400. He bought 
it from a surplus dealer in D.C. in the '70's for $5.00 or so. He commented 
on here that he wish he has bought all the guy had, because they are 
unobtainable now.
Joe W4AAB
- Original Message - 
From: WB3AWJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Anonymous QST Author suggests that Part 97 
requires6kHzAM Bandwidth Limit


I wonder if the writer of the original considered this usual approach of
 300-2.7 Kc  most likely came about from the practice of using the same
 filter to select the sideband in the exciter and defining the IF bandwidth
 of the receiver.

 Rather than on any real spectrum efficiency considerations.

 As the the 30 Kc wide AM signals probably another case of the 
 relatively
 poor design of the modern receiver.
 I'll keep using my good old Collins receivers.


 WB3AWJ
 Robert A. Poff
 Loganville, PA.

 S/V Loon
 1983 Hunter 34
 Havre de Grace, MD

 Lieutenant, target the offending power boat and launch photon torpedoes

 - Original Message - 
 From: rev. don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  high frequency hearing.  He goes on to allege that an AM signal
 occupies
  a bit more spectrum than two SSB signals, based on the notion that
 there
  is no need to transmit audio frequency components of the voice that 
  fall
  below 300 Hz, and that the usual approach with SSB is to transmit
  frequencies from 300 to 2700 Hz.

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.
 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Broadcast Transmitter Heaven

2008-02-13 Thread W6OM
Thanks for all the signal reports as I got the Bauer 707 dialed in with the
modified oscillator which accepts multiple crystals. Now I can QSY in 5 KHz
increments from 3870 to 3885 AM.

 

The Gates BC 500T is nearing completion and I hope to launch her this week
end and will be calling CQ in the evenings on 1.885 and 1.925 AM.  She looks
good on the scope into my big dummy load  but things change when you put the
fire in the wire  so all signal reports will be welcomed as I do the final
tweaking and peaking.

 

Thanks again to everyone for your help and encouragement

 

Ron Weaver   W6OM

 

www.qsl.net/w6om

 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

2008-02-11 Thread W6OM
Good question, I have not restored any Viking II's or set them up to drive
an amplifier but as I recall they have a pair of 6146's in the final rather
than just one don't they?

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 7:22 PM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

Hello,
  Would this one knob screen control technique also be a workable option 
for a VKII, etc, after proper loading/setup into a dummy load?

Bill, KB3DKS

-Original Message-
From: W6OM

Pat

Leave the mic gain alone, just crank down the screen voltage via a pot
inside.  I can crank mine down to as little as 7 watts.  When I want 
full
power and no amp I open up the crystal socket door and crank it back up.
Nothing else really needs to change.

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om




More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope to monitor modulation on AM transmitter

2008-02-11 Thread W6OM
John

The SB 610 monitor scope is one of the best all around performers for the
money you can still buy today.  I have two, one connected to the plate of
the 2nd IF on an NC 300 for monitoring the incoming signals and for transmit
it monitors a Ranger driving an SB 220 on AM.

The second on is connected to the grid of the 2nd detector stage on my 75A4
to monitor incoming signals and also watch my transmit signal on a Bauer 707
converted to 75 meters.

Hard to imagine a more versatile inexpensive monitor scope available now
days as they sell for anywhere from $60.00 to $80.00 on eBay and else where.
If the face plate is good, cabinet paint is available from a couple of
sources and if needed  to match a vintage IF strip 455Khz IF cans are cheap
and plentiful at Tubes and More in Phoenix for less than $3.00.

One word of caution, every one I have owned has had the 1600V mylar caps go
bad, so if you buy an SB610 order some replacements ($12.00 from Mouser) and
replace them first.

Enjoy 

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John King
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 7:39 AM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope to monitor modulation on
AM transmitter

Anyone experienced at using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope
to monitor the modulation pattern of the outgoing
signal of an AM transmitter?

I need to have session  to discuss the application of
the SB 610 to that operation.

Please email me directly for such a discussion. Your
assistance in understanding the application and
process will be greatly appreciated. Thanks and 73,
John, K5PGW 


 


Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

2008-02-11 Thread W6OM
Thanks Pat  others who wrote concerning how I use a Ranger to drive an
SB-220. Here is a list from my archives of things I tried.

1. The much touted pot to crank down the screen voltage.  Simple, easy mod.
Use a non conductive shaft, bring it out through the hole in the crystal
socket and you can still insert a crystal, pot the cap back on and crack it
all the way up when you want to.

2. Simply using less grid drive when tuning up the Ranger, bad idea, my
linearity goes to hell.

3. Built a 3db attenuation pad with a hand full of one watt resistors, a
couple of coax connectors a box and a switch.  Got way too hot

6. Built a 6db attention pad with a hand full of 5 watt resistors, a couple
of coax connectors a box and switch.  Found the sweet spot 
  
7. If you don't want to build an attenuator or mod the Ranger, surplus
attenuators are plentiful and on eBay, Surplus sales of Nebraska and I am
sure countless other places.



All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Thompson
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 4:37 PM
To: 'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'
Subject: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

How did you go about getting the RF drive from the Ranger down to a level
usable by the SB220? I'm thinking about something similar to get to the
200-250 watt carrier level (or 800 to 1000 pep AM). I'm guessing the amp
won't need much more than 10-15 watts drive (40 to 60 watts pep AM) leaving
a little headroom.

I thought about a homemade pad but that's a lot of heat to throw away. Maybe
a 3db pad and turn the drive down a little?

I could lower the screen voltage but it would be nice to have the rig full
power when barefoot.

Can you get by with just lowering the drive and microphone gain?

Pat
wa4tuk

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of W6OM
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:10 PM
To: 'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope to monitor
modulation on AM transmitter

John

The SB 610 monitor scope is one of the best all around performers for the
money you can still buy today.  I have two, one connected to the plate of
the 2nd IF on an NC 300 for monitoring the incoming signals and for transmit
it monitors a Ranger driving an SB 220 on AM.

snip

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1272 - Release Date: 2/11/2008
5:28 PM
 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope to monitor modulationonAM transmitter

2008-02-11 Thread W6OM
Thanks Jim

You make excellent and insight points as always.  I have encountered the
issues you speak about in interfacing my 610's with various vintage
receivers like my NC-300 and 75A4.

Thank goodness that I stumbled across small 455Khz and other frequencies
IF cans at Antique Electronics Supply in Phoenix.  With some minor surgery
both 610's are monitoring received signals on my receivers.  On the NC-300 I
went directly to the plate of the 2nd IF and coupled it through a 5PF mica.

On the 75A4 I went to the grid of the 2nd detector tube and used 4.3 PF
mica.   Both have full deflection and ad a bit of fun to monitoring by
being able to see the everyone's signal.

But then, it has been mentioned from time to time that I am a tad
obsessive about these beautiful old boat anchors.

Cheers my friend 

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff/W5OMR
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 7:19 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope to monitor
modulationonAM transmitter

Jim Wilhite wrote:
 To anyone considering an SB 610 or 614, keep in mind they must be 
 constructed to match the IF frequency of the receiver to which they 
 will be interfaced.

Uh...
I was under the impression that the 610 / 614 monitor scopes were for 
monitoring the 'transmitted' signal.


 Some of them were built to work with the Heath receivers with the 3 
 meg IF and those that were built for 455 Kc. had the coils that would 
 do so.

 If you find one for with the 3 Kc IF coils, 

kc?  you said 3meg(sic).  Which is it?

 it won't work properly with a NC 300 or NC 183D for example.  Heath 
 packaged the coils for both with the units and the builder chose which 
 he wanted.  I doubt you will receive the coils that were not used 
 during construction.   Check them out before you find you have 
 something that won't work with your receiver.


So...
I was under the impression that the 610 / 614 monitor scopes were for 
monitoring the 'transmitted' signal.  Since I wasn't sure, I went looking.


http://web.comhem.se/~u87540545/Heathkit/Products/pageSB610.htm
Heathkit SB-610
The Heathkit SB-610 monitor scope is primarily designed for monitor the 
RF-signals, on-the-air signals, from the local transmitter. It can also 
be used to monitor received signals when connected to a receiver.
It monitors RF-envelop, RF-trapezoid and RTTY pattern. SB-610 has also a 
built-in two-tone sinewave AF-oscillator for SSB-transmitter adjustment.

The Monitor-Scope matches the SB-line.




-- 
Driving your AM Rig without a scope, 
is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV)

--
73 = Best Regards,
-Geoff/W5OMR

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

2008-02-11 Thread W6OM
Pat

Leave the mic gain alone, just crank down the screen voltage via a pot
inside.  I can crank mine down to as little as 7 watts.  When I want full
power and no amp I open up the crystal socket door and crank it back up.
Nothing else really needs to change.

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Thompson
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 6:20 PM
To: 'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

Thanks to all who replied.

If I go the route of lowering screen voltage is it enough to lower just the
screen on the 6146? And turn the mike gain down?

I like the idea of hiding the control shaft behind the crystal cover plug!

Pat
wa4tuk

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Blau
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 7:45 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

You can lower the power in a couple different ways.
Lower the screen, run the PA on the low HV, attenuate the RF, etc.

If you're driving an amp there's no advantage to running full power in 
the Ranger.  In fact, you give up a lot of potential positive peak 
modulation capability, if that's important to you.
I vote for lowering the screen and making it adjustable.
Second would be running the PA on the lower HV rail.

There are numerous articles on line for modifying the Ranger to do these 
things.

g

Patrick Thompson wrote:
 How did you go about getting the RF drive from the Ranger down to a level
 usable by the SB220? I'm thinking about something similar to get to the
 200-250 watt carrier level (or 800 to 1000 pep AM). I'm guessing the amp
 won't need much more than 10-15 watts drive (40 to 60 watts pep AM)
leaving
 a little headroom.
 
 I thought about a homemade pad but that's a lot of heat to throw away.
Maybe
 a 3db pad and turn the drive down a little?
 
 I could lower the screen voltage but it would be nice to have the rig full
 power when barefoot.
 
 Can you get by with just lowering the drive and microphone gain?
 
 Pat
 wa4tuk
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1272 - Release Date: 2/11/2008
5:28 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1272 - Release Date: 2/11/2008
5:28 PM
 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

2008-02-11 Thread W6OM
Thanks Bill

I don't have a schematic of a VII but it seems rational to assume the same
type of mod would work in it.  Let me know what you end up doing.

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 7:48 PM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

Ron,
Yes, the VKII uses a pair of 6146s and it has a 6AQ5 adjustable screen 
clamp tube.
I see no reason to wast power with an attenuator and there is a sweet 
spot in the final current thru the mod iron that requires a less than 
full rated final current to avoid saturation.
  It seems to me that a fine adjust here would allow power reduction for 
use with an amp and also enable fine tuning the final current without 
reducing optimum drive current when used barefoot.

Just an idea. I like the ability of the DSB transmitters like the HT 
37, FT101,etc to lower the output power without having to retune the 
final.

73,
Bill, KB3DKS

-Original Message-
From: W6OM

Good question, I have not restored any Viking II's or set them up to 
drive
an amplifier but as I recall they have a pair of 6146's in the final 
rather
than just one don't they?

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om






More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] West Coasr AM Operation?

2008-01-30 Thread W6OM
Bob

I consistently work PNW AM stations on 3870 each week.  During the winter
months propagation lengthens out and we can copy the PNW gang after 8:00PM
local time.

On 40 meters you will find a lot of AM stations in California, Arizona and
Oregon almost every day on 7293 starting about 10:00 AM local and going till
early afternoon.

Hope to hear you some evening on 3870

All the Best

Ron

www.qsl.net/w6om

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Macklin
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 4:17 PM
To: AM Radio
Subject: [AMRadio] West Coasr AM Operation?

I used to hear the PNW AM group on 3870 but I guess because of the solar
cycle they have dropped down into the noise.

I also used to hear the Calif. AM operators on 14.286. But it has been
several years since I have heard any 20M AM operation.

But what about 40M AM operation. Is there any 40M AM operation on the west
coast?

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] West Coasr AM Operation?

2008-01-30 Thread W6OM
Thanks Bob

If you have time listen tonight, it's the weekly AMI net and usually we have
30 plus stations checking in from around the Western States on 3870.  Warm
up begins at 7:00 PM, Net begins at 8:00 PM and round table after net.

Come on down, the water is warm...

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Macklin
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 5:25 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] West Coasr AM Operation?

Thanks Ron,

I will put my SB-301 on these frequencies for a couple weeks and see if I
can hear anything.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: W6OM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] West Coasr AM Operation?


 Bob

 I consistently work PNW AM stations on 3870 each week.  During the winter
 months propagation lengthens out and we can copy the PNW gang after 8:00PM
 local time.

 On 40 meters you will find a lot of AM stations in California, Arizona and
 Oregon almost every day on 7293 starting about 10:00 AM local and going
till
 early afternoon.

 Hope to hear you some evening on 3870

 All the Best

 Ron

 www.qsl.net/w6om

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Macklin
 Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 4:17 PM
 To: AM Radio
 Subject: [AMRadio] West Coasr AM Operation?

 I used to hear the PNW AM group on 3870 but I guess because of the solar
 cycle they have dropped down into the noise.

 I also used to hear the Calif. AM operators on 14.286. But it has been
 several years since I have heard any 20M AM operation.

 But what about 40M AM operation. Is there any 40M AM operation on the west
 coast?

 Bob Macklin
 K5MYJ
 Seattle, Wa,
 Real Radios Glow in the Dark
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] ARRL Great Lakes Director on IARU Bandplan

2007-11-27 Thread W6OM
All Mr. Sumner and his board have to do is take me up on my free offer of a
Webinar at my expense. No strings, my engineers will set it up, all the ARRL
team has to do is sit down in front of their computers, turn on a web cam
and accept our questions in a rational and well though out manner.  All
they have to do is provide us with clear answers.  Take one hour out of
life and communicate with us so we can all get back to our rigs and AM.

Unfortunately Mr. Sumner and his team have stone walled my offer and remain
unwilling to speak to the membership in real time and provide clear credible
answers.

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Markavage
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:09 AM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ARRL Great Lakes Director on IARU Bandplan

Hey Steve, I guess congrads on the promotion.
Pete, wa2cwa

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:47:04 -0500 Warren Elly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
 Mr Johnson...
 
 Many thanks for your reply, the first the AM community has 
 received  
 one that was both civil and credible. I believe that some of your  
 fellow directors ought to be ashamed of themselves, and I hope you  
 
 have seen some of their correspondence directed to us. Its very  
 disappointing, and has only served to reinforce the view that many 
 of  
 us have formed of the league through a lifetime of disappointment on 
 a  
 range of issues from incentive licensing, to bpl, to code  
 requirements, to PRB-1, to bandwidth issues. I think you misjudge 
 and  
 under estimate what you call a small flurry of concern by some AM  
 
 colleagues. Considering the current state of the hobby, the number 
 of  
 new licensees, and the fact that the great majority of us are aging  
 
 and that a significant number of us collect and restore old gear, 
 the  
 league needs to turn this AM issue into a wake up call.
 Most of us are long-time amateurs, who've been league 
 members nearly  
 all our lives. I signed up at age 12, three years before I got my  
 novice ticket. I've been licensed now over 40 years, and have 
 operated  
 AM continuously in one way or another over those years. I remain  
 convinced that the league would outlaw our part of the hobby if it  
 
 could. I only maintain my membership so that I can have a voice and  
 
 won't be dismissed as an outsider. I think its sad that looking 
 back  
 at the issues over the years, I can't think of a single issue that  
 
 left me feeling like the league was on my side as an amateur.
 I think most of us would have felt much better if our arrl  
 
 representatives at the IARU conference were a bit more informed, and 
  
 put their intentions in voting for this proposal on the record. I  
 think we also have our doubts that there was not, in fact, some plan  
 
 to use the IARU issue as a leg up to move closer to outlawing AM in  
 
 the US. Mr. Rinaldo's role remains of interest, and is most 
 suspect.
 As for the CQ editors path towards bad journalism, as a 
 journalist  
 all my life, I must caution you that these things happen when one is 
  
 unable to get the whole story. If the league was more forthcoming, 
  
 and spoke with clarity and transparency, these things would not  
 happen. Its a shame that no logical, thinking person could avoid the 
  
 same conclusions CQ reached, based on the facts at hand. What else 
  
 are we to think?
 Again, thank you for your frankness and willingness to 
 address the AM/ 
 Vintage radio community. I wish some of your candor would rub off on 
  
 the rest. But I'd also urge you to weigh again the importance of a  
 
 vital, active community in amateur radio that's much more than  
 small  
 flurry in the big picture.
 
 73,
 
 Warren Elly W1GUD
 Tampa, Florida
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] AMers all old-timers?

2007-11-20 Thread W6OM
When they give that much control over them to allow you to make them angry
it's signal that we are being heard and its an uncomfortable feeling.

I agree about the characterizations, as we have many AM operators out here
on the Left Coast in every age group. 

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:41 PM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [AMRadio] AMers all old-timers?


An interesting arrival in my email today...  I received a message from an 
anonymous person in reply to a message I'd sent directly to several ARRL 
officials regarding the IARU bandplan.  Well, to be specific I should say it
contained 
the same subject line as a message I sent only to a group of ARRL officials'

addresses, with an re: added.   That same subject line was not used on any

of my mailing list or web-board postings.  Interesting... might have been
from 
someone who'd been forwarded a copy of my message by one of those officials,
I 
suppose.

In any event, the message contained some poorly written name-calling and 
profanity, which I will mostly ignore, but the following line would be of
interest 
to everyone I think...

...senile old AM jerks! You been pissing on 
the league for too long.  you will all be dead in a couple 
years, so what you care?  run
AM all you want nobody cares...

Nice.  In the message I sent under that subject line I didn't even mention 
AM.  I guess it is another reference to AMers only being oldtimers ready to
kick 
the bucket.  That's certainly not my experience talking to guys on the
bands. 
 And I'm only middle-aged at 44 years old, and I personally know 6 guys in 
their 20s and 30s that run AM quite a bit.

Steve WD8DAS




**
Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest 
products.

(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop000301)
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] AMers all old-timers?

2007-11-20 Thread W6OM
You be DA MAN.Fire up those BC 610's, lets Rock!

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rbethman
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 4:32 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AMers all old-timers?

I guess I'll make THEM very uncomfortable for SOME time.

I'm 57, BUT my grandparents lived into THEIR mid 80s!

Time to go warm up the filaments on BOTH BC-610s!

Bob - N0DGN

W6OM wrote:
 When they give that much control over them to allow you to make them angry
 it's signal that we are being heard and its an uncomfortable feeling.

 I agree about the characterizations, as we have many AM operators out here
 on the Left Coast in every age group. 

 All the Best

 Ron Weaver   W6OM

 www.qsl.net/w6om

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:41 PM
 To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [AMRadio] AMers all old-timers?


 An interesting arrival in my email today...  I received a message from an 
 anonymous person in reply to a message I'd sent directly to several ARRL 
 officials regarding the IARU bandplan.  Well, to be specific I should say
it
 contained 
 the same subject line as a message I sent only to a group of ARRL
officials'

 addresses, with an re: added.   That same subject line was not used on
any

 of my mailing list or web-board postings.  Interesting... might have been
 from 
 someone who'd been forwarded a copy of my message by one of those
officials,
 I 
 suppose.

 In any event, the message contained some poorly written name-calling and 
 profanity, which I will mostly ignore, but the following line would be of
 interest 
 to everyone I think...

   
 ...senile old AM jerks! You been pissing on 
 the league for too long.  you will all be dead in a couple 
 years, so what you care?  run
 AM all you want nobody cares...
 

 Nice.  In the message I sent under that subject line I didn't even mention

 AM.  I guess it is another reference to AMers only being oldtimers ready
to
 kick 
 the bucket.  That's certainly not my experience talking to guys on the
 bands. 
  And I'm only middle-aged at 44 years old, and I personally know 6 guys in

 their 20s and 30s that run AM quite a bit.

 Steve WD8DAS




 **
 Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest 
 products.

 (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop000301)
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

   
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Trying to be nice

2007-11-14 Thread W6OM
Thanks Charlie

While I do respect the chain of command as a former Air Force Officer, in
this case the ARRL is more like a string of banana's. Have you ever met some
of these Directors and what they call officers. As it says in all the books
on executive leadership, the style, effectiveness and openness of any
organization is a reflection of the leader who is at the top.

Only way to take on this snake is at the head.

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of charles L.
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 6:37 AM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [AMRadio] Trying to be nice

Here's a copy of a letter I sent to my Section MGR in
NC, N4IB.  Thought I would be nice and start it up the
chain of ARRL command and see what response I get.  So
far...nothing.

Charlie in NC

Sir,

Perhaps the opening salvos have been fired at you or
somewhere up the line, but this IARU band plan
proposal has a section of the community stirred up.

The ARRL's love of lawyereze writing must be a sign of
the litigious times, but why can't the ARRL just put
it in plain english that AM operation is a legitimate
mode, unrestricted in any phone segment?  Why did it
not object to the IARU band plan idea that keeps
AM'ers on edge because it talks around the issue in
vague terms.

One section manager has already insulted thousands of
AM operators, equipment restorers, builders, AND ARRL
members, with his comments, then had to backpedal like
a lying politician.  To keep insulting a membership
base, that probably has a per capita level of
membership higher than any other group is bad
business.

AM operators have been forced to bend over backwards
to operate on the bands.  Talk about 60 meters being
channelized?  AM'ers have been channelized for years
in order to avoid the conflagration that occurs when
we venture off our gentlemens agreement frequencies.

The ARRL just needs to support their members who
follow this aspect of this hobby, just as they do the
digital modes, contesters, and quasi official
emergency responders in their hobby persuits.  The
ARRL just needs to come out and put it in clear
writing that they support AM operation, that
international band plans from IARU or anybody else
should show AM as a legititmate  mode of operation on
assigned amateur freqencies, and thank AMer's for
being the best group at sticking to the gentlements
agreement for operating locations in order to minimize
QRM, both radio and verbal.

If the ARRL would just do this in simple plain
english, not technize, not lawyereze, just AM, then it
would not have to face the barrage it calls in on
itself every time this topic comes up.

Feel free to forward up the chain of command. Thanks.

Charlie, W4MEC Henderson County, NC
38 years a ham, 37 years an ARRL member





 


Be a better sports nut!  Let your teams follow you 
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] FW: IARU Band Plan

2007-11-13 Thread W6OM
Letter below is from the ARRL President Joel Harrison W5ZN in response to my
letter below his.  Almost amusing transparent rhetorical response to my
letter and still acceptance to go live with a webinar to explain themselves,
not the IARU.

 

Enjoy the read, this is only the opening round of what plan to make a
significant even until accept my offer. 

 

All the Best

 

Ron Weaver   W6OM

 

www.qsl.net/w6om

 

From: Joel Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 4:38 PM
To: 'W6OM'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IARU Band Plan

 

Ron,

Thank you for letting me know of your concerns with regard to the band plan
adopted recently by the member-societies of IARU Region 2. You sent your
message to a number of individuals; because the ARRL is the representative
organization in the IARU for radio amateurs of the United States, I am
replying on their behalf.

IARU regional band plans have been in existence for many years. They are
developed, reviewed and approved at regional conferences of the IARU
member-societies. The band plans provide voluntary guidelines that are
intended to assist amateurs in making the most effective use of our limited
frequency allocations. They are not restrictions and carry no regulatory
authority. On behalf of the ARRL, I can assure you that there are no plans
to propose incorporating any IARU band plan into the FCC rules. One virtue
of voluntary band plans is that they are more flexible and can be amended
more easily than the FCC rules; writing them into the rules would be
counterproductive.

The new IARU Region 2 band plan was developed by delegates to the Region 2
Conference from a number of countries. It does not align in every respect
either with the FCC rules or with operating patterns followed by US
amateurs. Unlike the United States, most countries do not have regulations
setting out subbands for different types of emission. Even in the US the FCC
rules do not provide much detail with regard to frequency use. As FCC
amateur licensees we are obliged to cooperate with one another in selecting
transmitting channels and making the most effective use of amateur service
frequencies, and to follow good engineering and good amateur practice.

Your message objects to the Region 2 band plan for suggesting limits that
are more severe than regulations from the governments in the region.
However, the band plan does not contain limits. As voluntary guidelines
the band plan cannot by definition be more severe than regulations. And
finally, if the band plan did not suggest an operating pattern that is a
subset of the regulations it would serve no purpose.

Your message refers to IARU President Larry Price as wishing to discourage
footnotes among the various regional plans he oversees. First, the IARU
President does not oversee regional band plans. Each regional plan is
developed by the member-societies of that region, in accordance with the
constitution, bylaws and rules of the regional organization. The regional
organizations are autonomous entities and do not answer to the IARU
President. Second, Mr. Price's observation with regard to footnotes had
nothing whatsoever to do with IARU band plans. Footnotes are not by their
nature either good or bad; it depends on what they say. Mr. Price's
observation had to do specifically with footnotes in the ITU Table of
Frequency Allocations that prohibit amateur operation, or authorize sharing
by additional services, in certain countries in certain parts of the bands
that are allocated in the ITU Table to the amateur service. One of the goals
of the IARU is to minimize such footnotes. On the other hand, there are
other footnotes to the ITU Table that are extremely beneficial to Amateur
Radio, such as the ones permitting amateur-satellite operation. In any case
this is totally unrelated to IARU band planning activities, which are
internal to the amateur service and to each regional IARU organization and
have nothing whatever to do with the ITU.

I hope this has reassured you that nothing will happen on January 1 that
will in any way affect your use of AM. We are always seeking ways to improve
the process of revision of the IARU Region 2 band plan and the ARRL Board of
Directors, who determine the policy for ARRL's input to IARU Region 2, are
always open to member input on future revisions that ARRL delegates may take
to future Region 2 Conferences. I encourage you to communicate with the
Division Director in your ARRL Division.

Sincere 73,

Joel Harrison, W5ZN

ARRL President

 

 

  _  

From: W6OM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 12:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [AMRadio] FW: IARU Band Plan

2007-11-13 Thread W6OM
As I said, until they agree to come forward and openly discuss their
activities concerning this issue I will not relent.

The subterfuge and rhetoric is all the understand.  The members deserves
clear open answers.

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:42 PM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FW: IARU Band Plan

The ARRL President writes:

 On behalf of the ARRL, I can assure you
 that there are no plans
 to propose incorporating any IARU band plan into the
 FCC rules.

So they voted in favor of it in committee but have no intention of following

its provisions?  The first and foremost of which is that the Member
Societies 
are to seek to put the bandplan into regulatory form with the respective 
government authorities!

Steve WD8DAS





**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] FW: IARU Band Plan

2007-11-13 Thread W6OM
Thank you sir.  Join us in pushing the ARRL for full disclosure. The dark
house needs the sunlight of truth. 

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose HF Silva
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:35 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FW: IARU Band Plan

Hello,

Si Señor !

*** MY HAT OFF ***

73 

Joe / ct1axg


--- W6OM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Letter below is from the ARRL President Joel
 Harrison W5ZN in response to my
 letter below his.  Almost amusing transparent
 rhetorical response to my
 letter and still acceptance to go live with a
 webinar to explain themselves,
 not the IARU.
 
  
 
 Enjoy the read, this is only the opening round of
 what plan to make a
 significant even until accept my offer. 
 
  
 
 All the Best
 
  
 
 Ron Weaver   W6OM
 
  
 
 www.qsl.net/w6om
 
  
 
 From: Joel Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 4:38 PM
 To: 'W6OM'
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: IARU Band Plan
 
  
 
 Ron,
 
 Thank you for letting me know of your concerns with
 regard to the band plan
 adopted recently by the member-societies of IARU
 Region 2. You sent your
 message to a number of individuals; because the ARRL
 is the representative
 organization in the IARU for radio amateurs of the
 United States, I am
 replying on their behalf.
 
 IARU regional band plans have been in existence for
 many years. They are
 developed, reviewed and approved at regional
 conferences of the IARU
 member-societies. The band plans provide voluntary
 guidelines that are
 intended to assist amateurs in making the most
 effective use of our limited
 frequency allocations. They are not restrictions and
 carry no regulatory
 authority. On behalf of the ARRL, I can assure you
 that there are no plans
 to propose incorporating any IARU band plan into the
 FCC rules. One virtue
 of voluntary band plans is that they are more
 flexible and can be amended
 more easily than the FCC rules; writing them into
 the rules would be
 counterproductive.
 
 The new IARU Region 2 band plan was developed by
 delegates to the Region 2
 Conference from a number of countries. It does not
 align in every respect
 either with the FCC rules or with operating patterns
 followed by US
 amateurs. Unlike the United States, most countries
 do not have regulations
 setting out subbands for different types of
 emission. Even in the US the FCC
 rules do not provide much detail with regard to
 frequency use. As FCC
 amateur licensees we are obliged to cooperate with
 one another in selecting
 transmitting channels and making the most effective
 use of amateur service
 frequencies, and to follow good engineering and good
 amateur practice.
 
 Your message objects to the Region 2 band plan for
 suggesting limits that
 are more severe than regulations from the
 governments in the region.
 However, the band plan does not contain limits. As
 voluntary guidelines
 the band plan cannot by definition be more severe
 than regulations. And
 finally, if the band plan did not suggest an
 operating pattern that is a
 subset of the regulations it would serve no purpose.
 
 Your message refers to IARU President Larry Price as
 wishing to discourage
 footnotes among the various regional plans he
 oversees. First, the IARU
 President does not oversee regional band plans.
 Each regional plan is
 developed by the member-societies of that region, in
 accordance with the
 constitution, bylaws and rules of the regional
 organization. The regional
 organizations are autonomous entities and do not
 answer to the IARU
 President. Second, Mr. Price's observation with
 regard to footnotes had
 nothing whatsoever to do with IARU band plans.
 Footnotes are not by their
 nature either good or bad; it depends on what they
 say. Mr. Price's
 observation had to do specifically with footnotes in
 the ITU Table of
 Frequency Allocations that prohibit amateur
 operation, or authorize sharing
 by additional services, in certain countries in
 certain parts of the bands
 that are allocated in the ITU Table to the amateur
 service. One of the goals
 of the IARU is to minimize such footnotes. On the
 other hand, there are
 other footnotes to the ITU Table that are extremely
 beneficial to Amateur
 Radio, such as the ones permitting amateur-satellite
 operation. In any case
 this is totally unrelated to IARU band planning
 activities, which are
 internal to the amateur service and to each regional
 IARU organization and
 have nothing whatever to do with the ITU.
 
 I hope this has reassured you that nothing will
 happen on January 1 that
 will in any way affect your use of AM. We are always
 seeking ways to improve
 the process of revision of the IARU Region 2 band
 plan and the ARRL Board of
 Directors, who determine the policy for ARRL's input
 to IARU Region 2, are
 always open to member input on future

RE: [AMRadio] FW: IARU Band Plan

2007-11-13 Thread W6OM
Have anyone ever seen or tried to communicate with N6AA. Looks like he slept
in the bushes last night, shows up disheveled, looks like he ironed his
clothes with a rock and rambles on about the wonders of the ARRL.

Not the kind of person who inspires respect.  Where do they find these
misfits... 

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:29 PM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FW: IARU Band Plan

The ARRL President writes:

 I encourage you to communicate with the
 Division Director in your ARRL Division.

We certainly saw how effective that was in the Central Division!   It was
all 
edumacational for us - we lerned we wuz ignorant and all wuk'd up over 
nuttin'.

Steve WD8DAS




**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Best Heathkit AM Transmitter

2007-11-12 Thread W6OM
I would tend to agree with the comments about the DX-100. For an inexpensive
transmitter it is easy to perform numerous modifications to improve the
audio, regulation, PTT and you have a real work horse that sounds terrific.

I sold my last one to a local Ham who is using it on 3870 in the evenings
and he gets compliments on the audio all the time.

Lots of room inside to work on them also. 

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Macklin
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 12:47 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Best Heathkit AM Transmitter

Probably the DX-100 if you want one of the plate modulated ones. The only
other plate modulated Heath AM trnasmitter is the Apache. And it's not much
more than a repacakaged DX-100. The couple friends I have that have both the
DX-100 and Apache prefer the DX-100.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 12:36 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] Best Heathkit AM Transmitter


 What would be Heathkits' best transmitter for AM HF? I am not partial  to
160
 so the DX-100 is not a factor neccessarily. 73, Steve  VE2SWC




 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the ignorant

2007-11-09 Thread W6OM
In an open letter to Mr. Sumner and his staff I invited them to participate
in a live Webinar at my expense to accept questions from the membership
and explain their activities in regards to this ongoing issue. I was clear
that it would be no expense to the ARRL and my engineering staff would set
up the portal and publish the login address to the membership.

To date Mr. Sumner nor anyone on his staff or directors have accepted my
invitation which raises and even more ominous question as to why they will
not explain this issue in an open forum.  Their condescending rhetoric and
contempt for we ignorant members is unacceptable.

According to the ARRL bylaws, we the members can a recall of the entire team
and replace them.

No court necessary, just use the rules and change the system 

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Bruhns
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 5:58 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the
ignorant

The word ignorant is usually, and in this context definitely, used as a
derisive term.  This letter and its mode of influence
delivery leaves quite a bit to be desired.

I agree that the ARRL negotiators should receive many requests to expand the
use of those little asterisks, to include 160 meters,
and more areas of 75, 40, etc.  If it doesn't matter, then there should be
no problem.

I'm just hoping that nobody takes anything to the Supreme Court again.  In
the past, that turned out to be less than helpful.

  Bacon, WA3WDR
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the ignorant

2007-11-09 Thread W6OM
Thanks for your observations.  All they (The ARRL) has to do is respond to
my free offer of a Webinar to explain their position to the membership. So
far all I see is more condescending responses about how WE the members
need to be better educated.  I believe my fellow Amateurs who enjoy AM and
Vintage equipment are more intelligent than that.  

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Markavage
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:07 PM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the
ignorant

I believe only the Directors and Vice-Directors are subject to a recall.
A proposal is required, along with at least 10% of the membership in that
Division signing and dating the petition. After the petition is
validated, a ballot is prepared and a vote must be taken of the
membership in that entire Division (Recall - Yes or No). The paid staff
isn't subject to the recall ruling.

Also, you said: we ignorant members
But, he(Director) really said: very few ignorant people

It doesn't sound like he was categorizing the entire AM community. But
then again, I. you, they, etc. can sometimes be ignorant to the true
meaning of someone's written intent especially if it's worded poorly.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 18:32:47 -0800 W6OM [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 In an open letter to Mr. Sumner and his staff I invited them to 
 participate
 in a live Webinar at my expense to accept questions from the 
 membership
 and explain their activities in regards to this ongoing issue. I was 
 clear
 that it would be no expense to the ARRL and my engineering staff 
 would set
 up the portal and publish the login address to the membership.
 
 To date Mr. Sumner nor anyone on his staff or directors have 
 accepted my
 invitation which raises and even more ominous question as to why 
 they will
 not explain this issue in an open forum.  Their condescending 
 rhetoric and
 contempt for we ignorant members is unacceptable.
 
 According to the ARRL bylaws, we the members can a recall of the 
 entire team
 and replace them.
 
 No court necessary, just use the rules and change the system 
 
 All the Best
 
 Ron Weaver   W6OM
 
 www.qsl.net/w6om
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Re: IARU bandplan

2007-10-24 Thread W6OM
In an open letter to the Board and officers of the ARRL I invited them to
participate in a worldwide Webinar at my expense wherein hams from all the
world would be free to ask questions as to the ARRL's continued pursuit of
this and other intitiaves which were withdrawn domestically but pushed
through international channels. The ARRL board and officers has stone walled
my request.

I have asked my legal team to subpoena the minutes of the IARU meetings and
currently will use my PR firm to send 237,000 e-mails to op-in hams around
the world asking why the CEO and his board will not participate in a free
webinar and respond to the membership concerning their activities.

FYI

Ron Weaver  W6OM   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:29 AM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [AMRadio] Re: IARU bandplan

Various wrote:

What chart are you looking at?? On 40 meters, 
CW is allowed from 7000 to 7300 KHz 
and
Steve - Please show me where it states this.

I am referring to the new IARU Region 2 bandplan section for 40m.  I should 
not have used the word allowed - sorry about that, that was too strong.
But 
my point is that the bandplan expects CW to happen in the lower 30 kHz of
40m, 
rather than the lower 150 kHz as has been the case for some time.

Perhaps my posts on this topic are unwelcome - I certainly have received a 
lot of hate-mail and name-calling off-list about it.  I guess I haven't
learned 
- I keep getting surprised by hams.  I keep mistakenly thinking they are all

my friends, or at least open to a discussion.

I apologize if my concern about this has splashed over onto those who don't 
care, or support the bandplan.  I thought it was important enough have a 
discussion about it before it happens, especially here on a couple mailing
lists for 
people interested in vintage equipment and modes.

I certainly hope it comes to nothing.  But I suspect this bandplan will 
become a source of friction and upset among hams in the years to come.  

One final point:  Compare the old IARU Region 2 bandplan from 1988 

http://www.iaru-regionii.org/Region_2_HF_Band_Plan.html

to the new one  

http://www.iaru-regionii.org/Region_2_MF__HF_Bandplan_Annex__1_2008.pdf

and notice how the current one matches much better how we use the bands now,

and how the new one is very different.

Steve WD8DAS





**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Left Coast AM?

2007-10-24 Thread W6OM
I work VE7ZWZ in BC two or three times a week around 8 - 9 PM on 3870

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Macklin
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 9:49 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Left Coast AM?

But what time should I be looking on any of these frequencies.

When I moved to this locatin in 2003 I was able to hear the PNW AM group on
3870. But now they are down in the noise.

I used to check 14.284 in the early evening (between 4PM and 5PM PST). Again
I use to hear them a few years ago but I have not heard them in over 2
years.

I was tols one to check 7290 at noon on saturdays. I tried that and no luck.

I received a note from a ham in Alaska that told me the farther north you go
the worse things get.

On 80M I do receive the PNW RTTY net most night on 3595. What I am receiving
seems to be ground wave. That's what I would expect right now.

The PNW AM locals (Seattle) are located north of me and over some high
hills. I suspect that I am off the end of their antennas.

My antenna currently runs east to west. So my best path is N/S.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark


- Original Message - 
From: W6OM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Left Coast AM?


 Plenty, 3870, 3880, 1925, 1885, 7,293, 7,140, 14,286.  Daily AM activity
 from all 11 western states AM community a total of 183 check ins the last
 two months..

 Ron  W6OM

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Macklin
 Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 9:28 AM
 To: AM Radio
 Subject: [AMRadio] Left Coast AM?

 Is there any real West Coast AM activity besides the PNW AM group that
 operates on 3870 in the early evening?

 Is there any West Coast AM activity on 40M?

 Recent ly I have been hearing SSB activity on 14.286 during the time
period
 that the the AM group used to operate.

 Or is the problem just the dead bands due to the solar cycle?

 Bob Macklin
 K5MYJ
 Seattle, Wa,
 Real Radios Glow in the Dark
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] NC-183D Alignment questions help

2007-09-26 Thread W6OM

Good Luck Van

I tried the same thing for several months and finally sold the 183D.  It is 
simply an awful design and one of the worst alignment tasks I ever 
attempted.


Cheers

Ron  W6OM

- Original Message - 
From: Van K7VS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:03 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] NC-183D Alignment questions help


I have a pristine NC-183D I picked up a year ago that I am finally getting 
around to.  Have replaced all the electrolytics and sound really good. 
BUT...I cannot get it to track properly as I follow the alignment 
instructions in the manual.  I can set the top frequency on each band with 
a small trimmer cap (this is the oscillator coil adjustment) but then 
according to the instruction manual you adjust the low end of the dial by 
moving a wire inside an inductor, which does move the lower frequency but 
not nearly enough to get to the frequency they say you should see.  Has 
anyone else had that problem during alignment of this receiver, or am I 
missing something.  Have checked the voltages at the first and second 
converter and they seem fine and have pulled off the mica cap across one of 
the oscillator coils  (1.8 to 5 Mhz) and it checked just fine (supposed to 
be 1600 pf and reads 1615 pf).  And have substituted a different 6BE6 in 
the first converter and still can't get close to proper or accurate dial 
tracking.  I am 500+ Khz off no matter what I have tried.  And thoughts on 
this one!  Thanks.  Van, K7VS


PS  I would like to hear from NC-183D owners that may have experienced 
this problem or have some thoughts about what I am seeing.  tnx

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.




__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] capacitors

2007-09-13 Thread W6OM
I use new Silver Mica Capacitors and have never had any issues with them. 
Tolerances are tighter, case is improved and they are inexpensive.


One hams opinion...

- Original Message - 
From: Rick Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service' 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:52 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] capacitors



What is the general consensus here on the reflector as to which type of
capacitor should be used in place of the old molded mica capacitors?

...I hope to settle an argument with your results. :-)

Thanks,
Rick/K5IAR

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.




__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Call Question

2007-06-23 Thread w6om

Yep, they do. Goes on everyday.

 Rick Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know of one or two that have old novice calls again.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 10:42 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] Call Question


A buddy of mine, N6BHH, who is not on any of the reflectors asked if it is
possible to get his original novice call back through the vanity system.
I had no answer, so I pose his question to you guys. His novice call was
WN5JJW. Do they reissue the old WN or KN calls?

Thanks,
Rick/K5IAR

__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

--
Ron Weaver - W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om
__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Broadcast Transmitters

2007-06-07 Thread w6om

I recently made the change to a Bauer 707 commercial broadcast transmitter 
running a pair of 4-400A and modulated by a pair of 4-400A.  After the 
modification to 75 meters and a few tweaks of the audio processor I must say it 
would be hard to ever go back to any one of my Johnson Viking Transmitters.

Its not so much the power, its the very big iron in the modulator which gives 
your voice full rich robust presence and sparkle while speaking normally. I'm 
running mine on low power three nights a week and its not any worse than the 
swimming pool pump motor running all day.

Try one, its an amazing AM adventure.

Ron Weaver - W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om
__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Coax Relays

2006-04-25 Thread w6om

Anyone know of a source for the old Dow key style coax (antenna) relays with 
the extra set of contacts on the side for receiver muting and 100V coil?

I need another one for one of my BA set up's.  Only place I see them is on eBay
but I prefer not to use them if possible.
--
Ron Weaver - W6OM 

Web Site:  www.qsl.net/w6om


Re: RE: [AMRadio] Baluns for Zepp Antenna

2006-04-19 Thread w6om

Thanks Don

You make a good point everyone should consider. I have noticed a teeker-totter 
effect with Toroids and un blanaced reactive feeders like 450 ohm ladder line. 
Get the SWR nulled out and in one minute it starts to climb again as a toroid 
saturates, null it out again and it happens again.

Your tuner suggestion is obviously the best but a few of us like to see if we 
can noodle it out with home brew stuff.

Thanks again for your comments

Ron
From: Donald Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/19 Wed PM 12:43:25 EDT
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Baluns for Zepp Antenna


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Simple Coax Balun

www.southgatearc.org/techtips/coax_balun.htm

Toroid Balun

www.rason.org/Projects/balun/balun.htm

Romex and PVC under $3.00 Balun

www.bloomington.in.us/~wh2t/balun.html



All those baluns operate on the assumption that the balanced load is 
primarily resistive.  If the load is highly reactive, as is often the case 
with open wire resonant feeders, the balun may not function properly, 
especially the toroidal types at high power.

I still prefer an honest-to-god balanced tuner, with split stator capacitor 
and symmetrical balanced coil.

Don k4kyv


__
AMRadio mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb


Ron Weaver - W6OM 

Web Site:  www.qsl.net/w6om



Re: RE: [AMRadio] League Bandwidth petition - final tally

2006-02-23 Thread w6om

I agree with Brad. As an officer of a public company I have many dealings with 
the SEC and have learned to spot and  understand Gov-Speak in documents.

What I read in that document was essentially an ominous set of pre 
suppositions and condesending characturizations along with some nice doggie 
head stroking.

I do not like the tone or content of the document nor do I  see anything 
positive about it. The length of time it takes to make major policy decisions 
is based in a historical psychological Government mentality that the policy 
will be changed but it takes two years for the public to accept it and go 
through the process of implementation.

I think Brad and others who view this document with suspiction are well 
informed and highly sensitive as to how the Government really works in 
regulatory issues.

Thanks for the bandwidth
 


Ron Weaver - W6OM 

Web Site:  www.qsl.net/w6om



RE: RE: [AMRadio] League Bandwidth petition - final tally

2006-02-23 Thread w6om

Thanks Brad

I agree, the document is very condesending and clealy written to set the stage 
for a change without inciting another barrage of comments. 

The comment about how the ARRL has found a middle ground   is an insult to 
anyone with a valid Amatuer Radio License  and can think for themselves.

I will ask my counsel what is necessary to file an injunction to stop the 
process and have it sent back to an independent organization for further study.

All the Best

Ron Weaver - W6OM 

Web Site:  www.qsl.net/w6om



[AMRadio] AMRadio] Music from the 40s

2006-01-24 Thread w6om

Two more sources for old music is 

www.itunes.com  works with Mac or PC

www.surfmusic.de  World wide streaming music from many countries

Enjoy

 
 From: Mark Foltarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 05:55:52 EST
 To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Music from the 40s
 
 Similarly, there is a small station in Chardon, Ohio with a web feed : 
 http://www.wkhr.org/
 
 de KA4JVY
 
 Mark
 
 
 
 --- W1EOF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Todd -
  
  I know it doesn't sound the same as those 6V6's pushing your speaker, but
  there are streaming alternatives on the internet. Somebody said that WABC
  streams although I have not checked out their website. There are also quite
  a few on live365.com. My favorite though is WMKV in Ohio. Pretty much 24/7
  40s style music. Lastly there is XM radio which has a channel devoted to 40s
  music.
  
  I don't have a good AM broadcast receiver setup in the office at the moment
  but I will soon. I should be able to get WABC here in RI most nights.
  
  73,
  
  Mark W1EOF
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Todd, KA1KAQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 9:37 AM
   To: Discussion of AM Radio
   Subject: Re: [AMRadio] (no subject)
  
  
   On 1/23/06, ne1s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
It was like being caught in a time warp. Some of my fondest childhood
memories are of hanging out in my grandfather's cellar in Chatham, NJ
building, fixing or otherwise diddling with some radio with
   WABC cranking
the tunes.
  
   I used to enjoy listening to big band music on 830 WCRN out of
   Worcester/Framingham area but they went to an oldies format sometime
   last year. I like oldies too, but it's hard to find 40s type music on
   AM these days so I miss WCRN in that sense. At 50kw, they have a
   potent signal up this way. You might give them a try too.
  
   There was also a station over in NY that played big band music a few
   years ago, but they got bought up by Disney and ended up playing
   children's music and soundtracks from Disney movies. Think it was
   WQEW? Up near the top of the dial.
  
   It's always more enjoyable to hear some old music on AM broadcast
   rather than more talk radio, but to me at least, there's nothing like
   hearing some Glenn Miller or Tommy Dorsey tunes rumbling out of a big
   old speaker with the receiver dials and tubes glowing away.
  
   Thanks for passing this on, Larry - I'll have to fire up that SX-28A
   in the front foyer that you were tuning around with in December - bet
   it'll sound great, WABC always comes in here well. (o:
  
   de Todd/'Boomer'  KA1KAQ
  --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 - Release Date: 1/20/06
  
  __
  AMRadio mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
  Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
  AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
  AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb
  
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com 
 __
 AMRadio mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb
 

Ron Weaver - W6OM 

Web Site:  www.qsl.net/w6om



[AMRadio] AM and FT-101E?

2005-10-06 Thread w6om

Can anyone tell me the fundamental difference between an FT 101 EE and FT 101 F 
in 25 words or less?

Thanks

Ron  W6OM




[AMRadio] AM Mods for FT 101 series

2005-10-06 Thread w6om

FT-101 Audio Modifications

Transmit Modifications

PB-1315:

# Change R2 from 47k to 4.7 M for crystal mic (D-104, etc.)
# Add 100 pF in parallel with R2 to bypass RF.
# Change C2 from 10 uF to 150 uF.
# Change R3 from 4.7k to 1.5k.
# Change C5 from 1 uF to 10 uF.
# Change C3 from 0.047 uF to 0.001 uF disc ceramic.
# Change C7 from 1 uF to 10 uF.
# Change C8 from 22 uF to 150 uF.
# Change C9 from 0.01 uF to 0.001 uF.
# Change C11 from 2.2 uF to 22 uF/35V .

PB-1184A:

# Change C12 from 0.22 uF to 2.2 uF (+ towards R7/8/9 )(use C11 removed from 
PB-1315).
# Change C2 from 0.01 uF to 0.001 uF.
# For high level auxilliary input from tape deck or other source cut L36 from 
pin 5 and connect to pin 4 of PB-1315 board.


Receive Modifications

First and foremost, the narrow SSB IF filter makes signals through the receiver 
sound very muffled. Fortunately, there is an aftermarket 6 kHz wide AM filter 
available for the FT-101/B/E/F series from:

International Radio and Computer, Inc.
3804 South U.S. 1 Fort Pierce, FL 34982
Phone: (407) 489-0956, FAX: (407) 464-6386

The filter is the Fox-Tango #2011. Price as of January 1993 is $75.00 plus 
shipping. The filter is installed in place of the CW filter, with some minor 
circuit changes so that the 6kHz filter is in circuit when the mode switch is 
placed in the AM position. The SSB filter remains in the FT-101 and is used in 
the SSB and CW modes.

PB-1315:

# Change C45-from 0.1 uF to 10 uF/25V electrolytic (+ towards base of Q9).
# Remove C39 0.047 uF.
# Change C43 from 0.01 uF to 10 uF/25V electrolytic (+ towards Q9).
# Change C44 from 220 uF to 750-1000 uF at 10V.
# Change C40 from 33 uF to 150 uF.


Cheers

Ron W6OM




[AMRadio] Antenna slip up mast

2005-07-30 Thread w6om
Thanks to everyone, once again the AM fraternity has come through. Lowes is the 
place and I am on the way to pick one up now.

It is amazing how through the years this group lead me through restoring a 
NC-300, NC-173, DX-100, Valiant and Ranger. I would not be enjoying AM Radio if 
it
were not for all your suggestions, recommendations and frienship.

73 to all and thank you

Ron Weaver - W6OM - CW  AM 

Ron Weaver - W6OM - CW  AM 




[AMRadio] Antenna for sale

2005-06-22 Thread w6om

Anyone close to Orange County California who is interested in a Tennadyne T-8 
log perodic 10-12-15-17-20 antenna?  About one year old still sitting on roof, 
excellent condition and will sacrifice it for much less than I paid for it.  
Pick up only in Irvine, will take apart for you, manual, instructions etc.

Antenna is surplus to my needs. Reply only to my direct email at  [EMAIL 
PROTECTED], Not to  the reflector.

73's  Ron  W6OM

Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO

www.qsl.net/w6om



Re: Re: [AMRadio] Coax Wall Plates

2005-06-08 Thread w6om

Thanks John

That seems to be the consensus of all the responses. I will purchase some 
plates drill them out, insert the barrells and see how it goes from there.

All the Best

Ron 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/06/08 Wed PM 12:03:15 EDT
 To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Coax Wall Plates
 
 You should have installed plaster rings while the walls were uncovered.  You 
 can easily make your own SO-239 wall connectors with blank plates either 
 plastic or preferably metal.  Get some SO-239 feed through barrels and drill 
 holes 
 in the wall plates to fit.  You will probably want to use an angle connector 
 on the inside of the wall, especially insulated walls to prevent having to 
 bend 
 the coax at too great an angle.
 
 I have a double gang blank wall plate that I drilled out for 6 evenly spaced 
 barrels.  Looks really professional.  There is a matching plate installed in 
 the overhang of the roof line so that the connectors are installed 
 vertically. 
 It is far enough back in the overhang so that coax seal or similar products 
 are really not needed unless you are hyper about it.
 
 73,
 
 John,  W4AWM
 __
 AMRadio mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 

Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO

www.qsl.net/w6om



[AMRadio] ART 13's for sale

2005-03-03 Thread w6om

Due to downsizing of the QTH I am forced to sell some of my beloved boat 
anchors.

Three ART 13's cleaned and ready to go with downloaded manuals, power supply 
suggestions and some idea's from users with respect to modifications.

These sell on eBay for $250 - $350 and $289.00 at Surplus Sales of Nebraska.  

$175.00 firm, first come first served.

Two are virgin, one has several enhancements to the output circuit.

All sitting in my office in Irvine for inspection, purchase and pick up.  I 
prefer not to ship the ART 13's unless absolutely necessary.  We are right 
across the street from the Orange County John Wayne Airport about 200 yards off 
the 5 Freeway at Mac Arthur.

If shipping is required I will only charge you for the packaging and actual 
shipping, no goofy handling charges.

Call for directions or questions to 949-851-8737

Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO

www.qsl.net/w6om



Re: Re: [AMRadio] ART 13's for sale

2005-03-03 Thread w6om

Thanks Damon

Great to hear from you again.  OK, that's two down as Dave W6KL is coming to 
the office tomorrow to pick one up and I'll hold the second one for you.

I really hate to part with them but I am just out of room.

All the Best
 
 From: Damon Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/03/03 Thu PM 05:07:43 EST
 To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ART 13's for sale
 
 Hi Ron,
 I would like one.  I know that you prefer not to ship it but we maybe 
 able to work out either my picking it up at the next AMI Barbecue or 
 when one of the guys comes to what used to be the Tuthill Swap and Shop 
 (now in Williams,AZ)
 Dennis, W7QHO usually drives to that one.
 Let me know.
 TNX, DE
 Damon, W7MD
 Tucson, AZ
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Due to downsizing of the QTH I am forced to sell some of my beloved boat 
  anchors.
  
  Three ART 13's cleaned and ready to go with downloaded manuals, power 
  supply suggestions and some idea's from users with respect to modifications.
  
  These sell on eBay for $250 - $350 and $289.00 at Surplus Sales of 
  Nebraska.  
  
  $175.00 firm, first come first served.
  
  Two are virgin, one has several enhancements to the output circuit.
  
  All sitting in my office in Irvine for inspection, purchase and pick up.  I 
  prefer not to ship the ART 13's unless absolutely necessary.  We are right 
  across the street from the Orange County John Wayne Airport about 200 yards 
  off the 5 Freeway at Mac Arthur.
  
  If shipping is required I will only charge you for the packaging and actual 
  shipping, no goofy handling charges.
  
  Call for directions or questions to 949-851-8737
  
  Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO
  
  www.qsl.net/w6om
  
  __
  AMRadio mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
  Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
  
 __
 AMRadio mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 

Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO

www.qsl.net/w6om



Re: Re: [AMRadio] ART 13 Transmitter - WWII Drake Power Supply

2005-02-25 Thread w6om

Wow, thanks Mark

That's impressive, what a set up for field day. 

Thanks again

Ron
 
 From: Mark Foltarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/02/25 Fri PM 04:08:38 EST
 To: amradio@mailman.qth.net amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: Re: [AMRadio] ART 13 Transmitter - WWII Drake Power Supply


Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO

www.qsl.net/w6om



Re: Re: [AMRadio] ART 13 Transmitter

2005-02-24 Thread w6om

Thanks Mark

My instincts told me that there had to be something available out there, either 
Drake, Heath or some commerical piece.

I assume you are using the Drake PS for the TR series?

Cheers

Ron 
 From: Mark Foltarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/02/23 Wed PM 08:02:06 EST
 To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ART 13 Transmitter
 
 Ron,
 
 I have been using an ART13 with the Drake AC power supply for the intended
 purpose.
 
 Give a shout here at 813-837-2324 or 440-570-1762.
 
 Or a QSO on 20m SSB
 
 de KA4JVY
 
 Mark
 
 
 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  Finally dug into all three ART 13's and ready to combine the best of two 
  into
  one really nice AM transmitter and sell the third one.   Before I heat up 
  the
  soldering iron, tube tester and VTVM I wonder if anyone has experiance using
  commerical or amateur power supplies with one of these beauties to save in
  home brewing one.
  
  Thanks
  
  
  Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO
  
  www.qsl.net/w6om
  
  __
  AMRadio mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
  Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
  
 
 
 
   
 __ 
 Do you Yahoo!? 
 Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
 http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
 __
 AMRadio mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 

Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO

www.qsl.net/w6om



[AMRadio] Old Novice Days

2005-02-23 Thread w6om

Wow what a treat is has been reading all the reports, Ok here is mine.

Sept 27th, 1958, arrive home from school, play with the dog, stack my books in 
the bedroom and see an envelope from the FCC and Mr. CB Plummer authorzing me 
as a new novice, call sign WV6CZH.

After dinner and homework that night my nervous shaking hands pounded out my 
first CQ on my newly built DX-20 (which sets in my office today) on 40 CW and 
KL7AIZ in Adak answred me.  I was so scarred it took him several times sending 
his call before I got it.

The next Saturday found me on 15 CW where I worked my first Russian and 
Europeans, wow what a thrill.  That old BC-348 receiver sounded great and it 
also has a place of honor in my office.

The hobby became an obsession and set the path for my life, career and travels. 
 Whatever the business becomes will always be a result of my beginings in Ham 
Radio.

I share the story with anyone visiting our offices.

Thanks for the Bandwidth

Ron  W6OM

Founder  CEO   www.vipernetworks.com

PS: I still fire up those old boat anchors weekly and cruise around 40 CW.
   
 From: Geoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/02/23 Wed PM 01:09:06 EST
 To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Old Novice Days
 
 Bob Macklin wrote:
 
  In 1969 the 40M Novice segment was 7150 - 7200. In 1986 it was 7100 
  - 7150.
 
  Bob Macklin
  K5MYJ/7
  Seattle, Wa.
 
 
 Before that.  I got my ticket in Feb of 1984, and it was 7100 to 7200kcs
 
 73 = Best Regards,
 -Geoff/W5OMR
 
 __
 AMRadio mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 

Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO

www.qsl.net/w6om



[AMRadio] ART 13 Transmitter

2005-02-23 Thread w6om

Finally dug into all three ART 13's and ready to combine the best of two into 
one really nice AM transmitter and sell the third one.   Before I heat up the 
soldering iron, tube tester and VTVM I wonder if anyone has experiance using 
commerical or amateur power supplies with one of these beauties to save in home 
brewing one.

Thanks


Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO

www.qsl.net/w6om



[AMRadio] ART 13 Transmitter

2005-02-16 Thread w6om

When it rains it pours. I just enherited three ART 13's, all in very good 
condition.

One has a 110V PS built in, the other two do not. Somebody point me to the ART 
13 information site so I can familiarize myself with the circuits and get these 
beautiful old rigs playing on AM again soon.

All the Best

Ron Weaver - W6OM - FO5VO

www.qsl.net/w6om