Re: [ATrpms-devel] Nvidia 319.49
Thanks, the next updates should have this issue fixed. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 07:13:22AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-319.49/libnvidia-ifr.so.1 /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-319.49/libnvidia-ifr.so /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-319.49/libnvidia-ifr.so.319.49 On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 07:27:10AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: In fact nvidia-graphics319.49-libs: Depends: libGL.so()(64bit) but it is not installable is still there ... the build claims: Provides: libGL.so.1()(64bit) libOpenCL.so.1()(64bit) [...] Requires: libGL.so()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) [...] Something is creating this dependency. If you have it installed you can check with ldd who is trying to pull in libGL.so. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Axel to my surprise nvidia 349.19 builds with kernels 3.10. It does not solve my gnome problem, but cinnamon is at full speed again, and no more libGL.so complaints... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.49-319.49-158.fc18.src.rpm I would suggest to compile this new driver as soon as possible. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Some outdated packages ...
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:37:43AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xvidcore-1.3.2-15.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vdpau-video-0.7.4-1.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ffmpeg-1.2.3-59.fc18.src.rpm Thanks, everything builds fine, but vdpau for el6. + make Making all in debian.upstream [...] make[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/repot-build/BUILD/libva-vdpau-driver-0.7.4/src' CC debug.lo libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.4.2 Debian-2.4.2-1ubuntu1, but the libtool: definition of this LT_INIT comes from libtool 2.2.6b. libtool: You should recreate aclocal.m4 with macros from libtool 2.4.2 Debian-2.4.2-1ubuntu1 libtool: and run autoconf again. make[2]: *** [debug.lo] Error 63 -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Nvidia 319.49
Hi, On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 07:27:10AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: In fact nvidia-graphics319.49-libs: Depends: libGL.so()(64bit) but it is not installable is still there ... the build claims: Provides: libGL.so.1()(64bit) libOpenCL.so.1()(64bit) [...] Requires: libGL.so()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) [...] Something is creating this dependency. If you have it installed you can check with ldd who is trying to pull in libGL.so. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Axel to my surprise nvidia 349.19 builds with kernels 3.10. It does not solve my gnome problem, but cinnamon is at full speed again, and no more libGL.so complaints... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.49-319.49-158.fc18.src.rpm I would suggest to compile this new driver as soon as possible. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] nvidia kmdls missing
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:37:45PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Axel, there is not a single nvidia kmdl available in the repo for the long lived version. I am trying to upgrade to F18 and I am stuck, because I do not have X running and nvidia 325 does not install either. Thanks. I see now. Nividia kmdl does not compile under 3.10. I forced the installation of nvidia 325.15 and I finally have X running on F18... The error I got was: nvidia-graphics325.15-libs: Depends: libGL.so()(64bit) but it is not installable nvidia-graphics325.15-libs.32bit: Depends: libGL.so but it is not installable Any ideas? Not realy ATM - I only see that it is missing the '.1'. Probably a bad nvidia build, and in that case all we can do is wait for the next update. :( -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mp3splt suite and mpd
Hi, libmp3splt fails with [...] checking for FLAC... no configure: WARNING: libFLAC is not found. Will build without flac support. [...] libogg, libvorbis (ogg/vorbis format) yes libFLAC (flac format) no [...] RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/repot-build/BUILDROOT/libmp3splt/usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so.* On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:31:43PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.5-28.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmp3splt-0.9.0-13.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-2.6-13.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.9-13.fc18.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New smplayer
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 08:22:25AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/smplayer-0.8.6-8.fc18.src.rpm Thanks! FYI: It doesn't build anymore on EL4 = removed from EL4. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mp3splt suite and mpd
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:21:54AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: There was a missing flac-devel ... I have already uploaded a fixed .src.rpm (same file as before). Thanks, seems to build now, so I can build the rest of the mp3splt stack. :) On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, libmp3splt fails with [...] checking for FLAC... no configure: WARNING: libFLAC is not found. Will build without flac support. [...] libogg, libvorbis (ogg/vorbis format) yes libFLAC (flac format) no [...] RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/repot-build/BUILDROOT/libmp3splt/usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so.* On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:31:43PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.5-28.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmp3splt-0.9.0-13.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-2.6-13.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.9-13.fc18.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] CGAL 4.1 available
Hi, do we want to support CGAL on RHEL5? I'm sure there are many CGAL users on older OSes, but they probably don't use packages anyway. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:26:34PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: and a new boost = 1.39 On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: It should build for rhel5 with a repack of mpfr... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpfr-2.4.2-1.el5.src.rpm On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, forget the comment, it never did build for RHEL5 in the past as well. I'll just remove the RHEL5 build assignment. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:17:33AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:09:13AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/CGAL-4.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks, doesn't build anymore for RHEL5: Error: Package: repot-build-deps-22123-1-1.noarch (tmp) Requires: mpfr-devel Probably a new dependency - should I just drop CGAL from RHEL5? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux 2.6.4 available
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 12:33:28PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I am still on F17, getting courage to upgrade to F18 using fedup. Do you think it will work with ATrpms repos? Yes, it works fine especially with ATrpms as it keeps packages updates across all distros with automatic upgrade paths. On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:20:20PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I did no understand. I also built it for F19 with mock... Hm, the file dependencies are on a file under /bin and the file is by now under /usr/bin. On what platform did you build f19 with mock? I suspect that there is some special support in the compoannets used for the bin move support which I don't have. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:34:20AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Axel, I added the option for ignoring js-devel: --without js http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-2.fc17.src.rpm On Fedora due to the shifting of /bin and the like the builds all fail. :( Can you also recreate qt47 (maybe qt48) and fix the qt-x11 issue? Thanks. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: I am using js-devel 1.70 from epel on rhel6. Can you add this as a new package or should we just filter this option in the spec? As I stated before, avidemux is running fine on rhel6 with qt47. However, there is a conflict with the original qt-x11: rpm -qf /usr/bin/qdbusviewer qt-x11-4.6.2-26.el6_4.x86_64 qt47-x11-4.7.2-1_18.el6.x86_64 On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, for el6 it fails with a missing dependency on js-devel. For el5 it fails with missing dependencies on libvpx-devel and pulseaudio-libs-devel. On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:29:43AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Hi, Axel here it is: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-1.fc17.src.rpm It requires qt4 = 4.7 (remember - rhel6 ships 4.6.2). Otherwise, it does not link (unresolved references). For rhel6 (or F14) should be built with: --without gtk3 Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] broadcom-wl-5.100.82.112-6.el6
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 12:40:37PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: But I am using this fixed new driver on a LeNovo running rhel6 just fine. Yes, it is Fedora that is broken. :( It is worth supporting broadcom on rhel6, because the fix was just redefining the switches on the code based on the kernel versions. Everything was done in the spec file just using sed ... True - you mean because currently the driver is the old one again? I just switched to test the builds, I will place the new one again instead (which will have broken Fedora support as well, but at least EL6 will be fine). Thanks! On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Thanks, ATM nothing builds under the new Fedora kernels anymore ... :( On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 08:08:04AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Anyway, I fixed the compilation for rhel6: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/broadcom-wl-5.100.82.112-7.fc17.src.rpm On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Axel, the kernel module does not build for rhel6. This is the reason I have never upgraded this package. The previous version works just fine for me ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New npapi-vlc available
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:12:42AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
I do not know. Here I get:
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
./configure: line 5529: AC_PROG_OBJCXX: command not found
checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed
checking for fgrep... /bin/grep -F
checking for ld used by gcc -std=gnu99... /usr/bin/ld
The patch adds an
m4_pattern_allow(AC_PROG_OBJCXX)
so the configure proceeds.
Maybe some dependencies are missing. I just require libtool. Do you need
to add autoconf and automake in your environment?
They are pulled in automatically, but perhaps this package requires a
specific auto* version?
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:04:51AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi Axel,
I have just downloaded
http://dl.atrpms.net/src/el6-i386/atrpms/stable/npapi-vlc-2.0.6-0.2git47ea8c7.src.rpm
and it builds fine here with mock.
The patch is being applied conditionally this way:
# RHEL6 fix
%if 0%{?rhel} 5
%patch0 -p1 -b .el6
%endif
I can use --with rhel if you prefer ...
I had used --define rhel\ 6 and the patch had been applied:
+ cd npapi-vlc-47ea8c7
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ echo 'Patch #0 (npapi-vlc-47ea8c7-el6.patch):'
Patch #0 (npapi-vlc-47ea8c7-el6.patch):
+ /bin/cat /var/tmp/repot-build/SOURCES/npapi-vlc-47ea8c7-el6.patch
What else could be causing this?
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 01:10:11PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Sorry, Axel, my bad.
I patched for rhel6, and it built there, but the patch broke
the other Fedora systems.
I re-uploaded the same .src.rpm and the patch is only applied on
rhel6
now.
it now breaks on RHEL6 with:
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host triplet
./configure: line 5382: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'
./configure: line 5382: `ac_tool_warned=yes ;;'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWo60t (%build)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:41:02AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/npapi-vlc-2.0.6-0.2git47ea8c7.fc17.src.rpm
This doesn't build on any platform. For f17 for example it fails
with:
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... none
configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host
triplet
./configure: line 5302: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'
./configure: line 5302: `ac_tool_warned=yes ;;'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QbkvsR (%build)
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] rar,unrar 4.2
Thanks! On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 02:07:07AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/unrar-4.2.4-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/rar-4.2.0-4.fc17.src.rpm -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] CGAL 4.1 available
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:09:13AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/CGAL-4.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks, doesn't build anymore for RHEL5: Error: Package: repot-build-deps-22123-1-1.noarch (tmp) Requires: mpfr-devel Probably a new dependency - should I just drop CGAL from RHEL5? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] gstreamer 1.0 ugly
Thanks! Built for f18/f19. On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:19:06AM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi, Just uploaded: http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.0.8-16.fc19.x86_64.rpm Probably only a little useful for f19 - I do not know of players packaged using gstreamer 1.0 yet. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] CGAL 4.1 available
Hi, forget the comment, it never did build for RHEL5 in the past as well. I'll just remove the RHEL5 build assignment. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:17:33AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:09:13AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/CGAL-4.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks, doesn't build anymore for RHEL5: Error: Package: repot-build-deps-22123-1-1.noarch (tmp) Requires: mpfr-devel Probably a new dependency - should I just drop CGAL from RHEL5? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.4 available
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:09:24PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm As before, requires gtk3. Thanks! The only thing that does not build anymore are the plugins for f19 due to missing mcs devel files: Error: Package: audacious-devel-3.4-2.fc19.x86_64 (at2) Requires: libmcs-devel = 0.7 It vanished under f19 and I haven't found the reason for it. Anyone know why it vanished and how to fix this? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux 2.6.4 available
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:34:20AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Axel, I added the option for ignoring js-devel: --without js http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-2.fc17.src.rpm On Fedora due to the shifting of /bin and the like the builds all fail. :( Can you also recreate qt47 (maybe qt48) and fix the qt-x11 issue? Thanks. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: I am using js-devel 1.70 from epel on rhel6. Can you add this as a new package or should we just filter this option in the spec? As I stated before, avidemux is running fine on rhel6 with qt47. However, there is a conflict with the original qt-x11: rpm -qf /usr/bin/qdbusviewer qt-x11-4.6.2-26.el6_4.x86_64 qt47-x11-4.7.2-1_18.el6.x86_64 On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, for el6 it fails with a missing dependency on js-devel. For el5 it fails with missing dependencies on libvpx-devel and pulseaudio-libs-devel. On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:29:43AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Hi, Axel here it is: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-1.fc17.src.rpm It requires qt4 = 4.7 (remember - rhel6 ships 4.6.2). Otherwise, it does not link (unresolved references). For rhel6 (or F14) should be built with: --without gtk3 Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New npapi-vlc available
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:04:51AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi Axel,
I have just downloaded
http://dl.atrpms.net/src/el6-i386/atrpms/stable/npapi-vlc-2.0.6-0.2git47ea8c7.src.rpm
and it builds fine here with mock.
The patch is being applied conditionally this way:
# RHEL6 fix
%if 0%{?rhel} 5
%patch0 -p1 -b .el6
%endif
I can use --with rhel if you prefer ...
I had used --define rhel\ 6 and the patch had been applied:
+ cd npapi-vlc-47ea8c7
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ echo 'Patch #0 (npapi-vlc-47ea8c7-el6.patch):'
Patch #0 (npapi-vlc-47ea8c7-el6.patch):
+ /bin/cat /var/tmp/repot-build/SOURCES/npapi-vlc-47ea8c7-el6.patch
What else could be causing this?
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 01:10:11PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Sorry, Axel, my bad.
I patched for rhel6, and it built there, but the patch broke
the other Fedora systems.
I re-uploaded the same .src.rpm and the patch is only applied on rhel6
now.
it now breaks on RHEL6 with:
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host triplet
./configure: line 5382: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'
./configure: line 5382: `ac_tool_warned=yes ;;'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWo60t (%build)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:41:02AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/npapi-vlc-2.0.6-0.2git47ea8c7.fc17.src.rpm
This doesn't build on any platform. For f17 for example it fails with:
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... none
configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host triplet
./configure: line 5302: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'
./configure: line 5302: `ac_tool_warned=yes ;;'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QbkvsR (%build)
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New npapi-vlc available
Hi, On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 01:10:11PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Sorry, Axel, my bad. I patched for rhel6, and it built there, but the patch broke the other Fedora systems. I re-uploaded the same .src.rpm and the patch is only applied on rhel6 now. it now breaks on RHEL6 with: checking for g++... g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of g++... gcc3 configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host triplet ./configure: line 5382: syntax error near unexpected token `;;' ./configure: line 5382: `ac_tool_warned=yes ;;' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWo60t (%build) On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:41:02AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/npapi-vlc-2.0.6-0.2git47ea8c7.fc17.src.rpm This doesn't build on any platform. For f17 for example it fails with: checking for g++... g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of g++... none configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host triplet ./configure: line 5302: syntax error near unexpected token `;;' ./configure: line 5302: `ac_tool_warned=yes ;;' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QbkvsR (%build) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] libquicktime
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:15:04AM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I have updated libquicktime to 1.2.4 - strait upgrade no changes besides version of sw. http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/libquicktime-1.2.4-31.fc19.src.rpm Thanks, done! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New smplayer available
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 07:28:32AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/smplayer-0.8.5-7.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/smtube-1.7-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks, built and waiting to be uploaded! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux 2.6.4 available
Hi, for el6 it fails with a missing dependency on js-devel. For el5 it fails with missing dependencies on libvpx-devel and pulseaudio-libs-devel. On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:29:43AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Hi, Axel here it is: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-1.fc17.src.rpm It requires qt4 = 4.7 (remember - rhel6 ships 4.6.2). Otherwise, it does not link (unresolved references). For rhel6 (or F14) should be built with: --without gtk3 Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux
Hi Kim, On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 01:39:43PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi Axel and Paulo, I have after MANY attempts managed to get avidemux-2.6.4 to compile and build :-) at least on f18 and f19. Here it fails on all, but el6 platforms. It's the /bin/arch dependency that needs fixing for one. I assumed all patches was upstreamed, so they are removed. Probably not really all of them. Best way to test is by trying to reverse the patch. I had to removed all that has to with languages (%find_lang) as it erred out. Should also be checked. Many files and directories have changed names ... Paulo could you try to recompile the package, and possibly also test, to see if it is sensible what I have done? I'm not sure he read this post, but it would be great if you two could coordinate efforts as you are both into the details now. :) http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/avidemux-2.6.4-31.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] dovecot spec
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:43:04AM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
Looking in BUILDROOT:
ls -l BUILDROOT/
total 8
drwxr-xr-x. 5 kim users 4096 Jun 26 10:59 dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386
drwxr-xr-x. 2 kim users 4096 Jun 26 10:59
dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386%{_tmpfilesdir}
Does not look like _tmpfilesdir is set :-(
:(
I have remembered that tmpfilesdir should be set to /etc/tmpfiles.d :-)
I have this installed:
atrpms-rpm-config-203-1.noarch
I decided to hardcode it for now. The macro is only valid for F19 (or
even F20?) upwards.
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-06-26 11:19, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
Hi Axel,
I noticed that Dovecot had a 2.2.4 release, but with a warning (in
2.2.3) that it needed a new version of Pigeonhole. There is
currently no new release of Pigeonhole, so I wanted to see what
would happen if I tried to recompile new Dovecot with old
Pigeonhole.
I downloaded your src-rpm, updated the version, and tried to rebuild but ran
into this error:
Processing files: dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i686
error: File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /home/kim/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.M1htXb
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/kim/rpm/BUILD
+ cd dovecot-2.2.4
+
DOCDIR=/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ export DOCDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ cp -pr docinstall/documentation.txt
docinstall/dovecot-openssl.cnf docinstall/example-config
docinstall/mkcert.sh docinstall/solr-schema.xml docinstall/wiki
AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING COPYING.LGPL COPYING.MIT NEWS README
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ exit 0
RPM build errors:
File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
It seems to come from these lines:
%if %{with systemd}
%_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.service
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.socket
%else
But I do not understand why dovecot.conf should go into some
temp-dir? nor why I have a problem here, since I have the newest
macros? I have tried to surround it with {}, with no luck. This is
on FC17.
Hope you can shed some light...
Regards,
Kim
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Bug in drbd 8.4.3-33 ?
Hi,
The error snippet you sent is not from the packages, but from a self
built module (GIT-hash: 89a294209144b68adb3ee85a73221f964d3ee515
build by motih@CentOS-devel, 2013-06-19 20:36:06). Are you sure the
packaged rpms behave the same?
In any case, if upstream decided to perform this change, there must be
a reason to do so. So undoing a change that upstream deliberately
performed is risky. I would ask the drbd developers about this issue.
Thanks for the info!
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 02:05:27PM +, Moti Haimovski wrote:
Hi,
I've installed the drbd and-drbd-kmodel packages on CentOS 6.4.
When tried to start the drbd service I've received the following error
message:
drbd: initialized. Version: 8.4.3 (api:1/proto:86-101)
drbd: GIT-hash: 89a294209144b68adb3ee85a73221f964d3ee515 build by
motih@CentOS-devel, 2013-06-19 20:36:06
drbd: registered as block device major 147
d-con r0: Starting worker thread (from drbdsetup [7617])
block drbd0: meta data offsets don't make sense: idx=0 al_s=1, al_sz4k=8,
al_offset=8, bm_offset=72, md_size_sect=262144, la_size=0, md_capaci
ty=270336
block drbd0: drbd_bm_resize called with capacity == 0
d-con r0: Terminating drbd_w_r0
The issue was traced to in_core-al_stripe_size_4k != MD_32kB_SECT
condition located in
check_offsets_and_sizes routine in drbd_main.c:
/* old fixed size meta data is exactly that: fixed. */
if (in_core-meta_dev_idx = 0) {
if (in_core-md_size_sect != MD_128MB_SECT
|| in_core-al_offset != MD_4kB_SECT
|| in_core-bm_offset != MD_4kB_SECT + MD_32kB_SECT
|| in_core-al_stripes != 1
|| in_core-al_stripe_size_4k != MD_32kB_SECT)
goto err;
}
This parameter is initialized with MD_32kB_SECT/8 therefore the test failed,
Looking at previous release/s - they all had the following test: ||
in_core-al_stripe_size_4k != MD_32kB_SECT/8)
I've updated my 8.4.3 code to that and it works fine now.
block drbd0: max BIO size = 4096
block drbd0: drbd_bm_resize called with capacity == 7538688
block drbd0: resync bitmap: bits=942336 words=14724 pages=29
block drbd0: size = 3681 MB (3769344 KB)
block drbd0: Writing the whole bitmap, size changed
block drbd0: bitmap WRITE of 29 pages took 23 jiffies
block drbd0: 3681 MB (942336 bits) marked out-of-sync by on disk bit-map.
block drbd0: bitmap READ of 29 pages took 0 jiffies
block drbd0: recounting of set bits took additional 0 jiffies
block drbd0: 3681 MB (942272 bits) marked out-of-sync by on disk bit-map.
Can you approve that indeed this is the issue ?
Are there any other issues in this release that I should be aware of ?
Thanks
Moti H.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] xbmc 12.2 available
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 11:21:46AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Still no connection (but ssh is working). This probably means that your IP (or that of a proxy you use) had been banned. I just did rest all lists, if it blocks again then there is some new misbehaviour (the intrusion detection is old and hasn't changed much). I have uploaded again the source because there was a Requires librtmp which I replaced for rtmpdump. Otherwise, the package does not install with the package from Atrpms... Thanks!! I also scheduled an f17 build, as you asked in another mail for it. On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Axel, I have uploaded the package but ATrpms is down for me. Therefore, I cannot post the link ... Can you grab the package? Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Fedora is messing up f17
Hi, On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I think that the file system unification (in part) is coming to f17: -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: Should be fixed in the next upload. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] xbmc for F17 missing
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:36:43AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Did you build xbmc for F17? Will do so for the builds you uploaded, thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
Hi all,
it does not build on el6 due to glib
checking for GLIB... no
configure: Requested 'glib-2.0 = 2.24' but version of GLib is 2.22.5
configure: error: This package requires GLib = 2.24 to compile.
So for el6 I pulled back the previous version. Other than that the
builds for Fedora are all OK.
Thanks!
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 08:47:16PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
Thanks Paulo, and thanks Kim,
I merged the two packages together, and they seem to build fine.
OTOH there are upstream updates (like 1.1.x), so the next round should
probably check the new upstream bits.
Thanks!
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:51:53AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
I had fixed this package some time ago for F17:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.19-15.fc17.src.rpm
I do not know if it needs something extra for F18 or F19, but amrnb/armwb
stuff
is no longer a problem...
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 03:45:49PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
On 15-06-2013 15:03, Axel Thimm wrote:
this fails to build with
CC libgstamrnb_la-amrnb.lo
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CC --tag=disable-static
--mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..-pthread
-I/usr/include/gstreamer-0.10 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I../../gst-libs
-I../../gst-libs -pthread -I/usr/include/gstreamer-0.10
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/libxml2-DG_THREADS_MANDATORY -DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS
-DG_DISABLE_ASSERT -Wall -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wvla
-Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wredundant-decls -Wwrite-strings -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security
-Wold-style-definition -Winit-self -Wmissing-include-dirs -Waddress
-Waggregate-return -Wno-multichar -Wnested-externs -g -O2 -g -pipe
-Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o
libgstamrnb_la-amrnb.lo `test -f 'amrnb.c' || echo './'`amrnb.c
In file included from amrnb.c:24:0:
amrnbdec.h:25:24: fatal error: interf_dec.h: No such file or directory
Yes as I wrote in a follow-up mail:
Forgot to tell that I needed to symlink all opencore-amr include
files to /usr/include I can remember having reverted to that before
- are they installed in an unusual path on fedora?
OK, thanks. We need to fix this in another way, e.g. adding
-I%{_includedir}/opencore-amrnb to the build process instead of
modifying the build environment with symlinks. Debian seems to have
had the same problem:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668011
Can you fix the package? Thanks! :)
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New libmatroska and vlc
Hi, On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 07:43:20PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Axel, you will have to rebuild vlc on rhel6 because of the new libmatroska 1.4. Argh ... :) Fortunately vlc 2.0.7 has been just released, so the rebuild(s) are better justified. :) As far as I know, vlc does not build with libdvbpsi 1.0. You will have to force the previous version 0.2.2: BuildRequires: libdvbpsi-devel 1.0 Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 03:45:49PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
On 15-06-2013 15:03, Axel Thimm wrote:
this fails to build with
CC libgstamrnb_la-amrnb.lo
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CC --tag=disable-static --mode=compile
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..-pthread
-I/usr/include/gstreamer-0.10 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I../../gst-libs
-I../../gst-libs -pthread -I/usr/include/gstreamer-0.10
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2
-DG_THREADS_MANDATORY -DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS -DG_DISABLE_ASSERT -Wall
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wvla -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-declarations
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wredundant-decls -Wwrite-strings -Wformat-nonliteral
-Wformat-security -Wold-style-definition -Winit-self -Wmissing-include-dirs
-Waddress -Waggregate-return -Wno-multichar -Wnested-externs -g -O2 -g
-pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o libgstamrnb_la-amrnb.lo
`test -f 'amrnb.c' || echo './'`amrnb.c
In file included from amrnb.c:24:0:
amrnbdec.h:25:24: fatal error: interf_dec.h: No such file or directory
Yes as I wrote in a follow-up mail:
Forgot to tell that I needed to symlink all opencore-amr include
files to /usr/include I can remember having reverted to that before
- are they installed in an unusual path on fedora?
OK, thanks. We need to fix this in another way, e.g. adding
-I%{_includedir}/opencore-amrnb to the build process instead of
modifying the build environment with symlinks. Debian seems to have
had the same problem:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668011
Can you fix the package? Thanks! :)
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] YafaRay
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:00:57AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Yes. But this version of yafaray only works with blender until version 2.49b. Blender 2.62 and up requires the newer yafaray 0.1.5, which can be installed directly by clicking a single button on the interface. http://vimeo.com/37373819 Therefore, I lost the interest in creating another yafaray package for now... :) Just out of curiosity, how does the direct install work? For each user under his home, or does it require root authorization and if so, where does the download land? /usr/local, /opt? On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi Axel, Do you want a package if it is already in Fedora? everything that adds value to the people pulling the packages is OK. If it is breaking something, then not, of course. More concrete on the yafaray bits: These are all from Paulo, and I forget what the history was, but I think he had a hard time getting the packages with upstream (Fedora) to import/work properly. yum list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 Available Packages YafaRay-blender.x86_64 0.1.1-8.fc19 fedora blender.x86_64 1:2.67b-1.fc19 updates-testing # yum --showduplicates list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 YafaRay-blender.x86_640.1.1-6.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.64a-3.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.67a-2.fc18 updates blender.x86_641:2.67b-1.fc18 updates-testing Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
}/libgstdvdread.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstlame.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstmad.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstmpeg2dec.so
#%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstsid.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgsttwolame.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstx264.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstamrnb.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstamrwbdec.so
%changelog
* Sun Jun 2 2013 Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk - 0.10.19-15
- Update to 0.10.19 + patches
- Remove sidplay - new sidplayfp is incompatible
* Mon Jul 04 2011 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br - 0.10.18-14
- Update to 0.10.18.
* Sun Jan 30 2011 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 0.10.17-12
- Update to 0.10.17.
* Tue Nov 2 2010 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 0.10.16-11
- Update to 0.10.16.
* Sat Jun 05 2010 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.15-10
- Updated to 0.10.15
* Sat Apr 10 2010 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.14-9
- Updated to 0.10.14
- Removed the x264 patch.
- Added BR amrwb-devel.
- Added BR opencore-amr-devel.
* Sat Nov 28 2009 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.13-8
- Patched for Fedora 12 (x264).
* Sat Nov 21 2009 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.13-7
- Updated to 0.10.13
- Removed libgstamrnb.so
* Thu Jun 18 2009 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.12-6
- Updated to 0.10.12
- Added BR x264-devel.
- Added GstX264Enc.prs
* Fri Apr 03 2009 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.11-5
- Updated to 0.10.11
- Added libgsttwolame.so
* Wed Mar 04 2009 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.10-4
- Rebuilt against amrnb-7.0.0.2
* Sat Nov 23 2008 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.10-3
- Updated to 0.10.10
* Sat Sep 13 2008 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.9-3
- Updated to 0.10.9
- Added libgstcdio.so, which has been removed from good.
* Mon Jun 02 2008 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.8-2
- Updated to 0.10.8
* Thu Apr 01 2008 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.7-2
- Updated to 0.10.7
- Removed rpaths.
* Sat Nov 11 2007 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.5-1
- Rebuilt for Fedora 8.
* Tue Aug 21 2007 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.6-1
- Update to 0.10.6.
* Wed Mar 30 2007 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.5-2
- Remove gtk-doc entirely, do devel package too.
* Fri Dec 15 2006 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.5-1
- Update to 0.10.5.
- Remove no longer needed AC3 sound patch.
* Sun Nov 26 2006 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.4-3
- Patched to fix AC3 sound.
* Tue Oct 17 2006 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.4-2
- Include translations which are now built.
* Sun Sep 17 2006 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.4-1
- Update to 0.10.4.
* Wed Apr 19 2006 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.3-1
- Update to 0.10.3.
- Remove no longer needed asfdemux fixes patch.
- Include new dvdsub plugin.
- Still don't add and include dvdnav plugin, not stable yet.
* Tue Mar 28 2006 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.2-2
- Include backported asfdemux fixes patch from Daniel S. Rogers.
* Wed Feb 22 2006 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.2-1
- Update to 0.10.2.
- Add libgstasf.so.
- Enable re-added libgstdvdread.so.
* Thu Jan 19 2006 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.1-1
- Update to 0.10.1.
* Fri Dec 16 2005 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.10.0.1-1
- Update to CVS snapshot.
- Enable amrnb support.
* Mon Dec 05 2005 Thomas Vander Stichele thomas at apestaart dot org
- 0.10.0-0.gst.1
- new release
* Thu Dec 01 2005 Thomas Vander Stichele thomas at apestaart dot org
- 0.9.7-0.gst.1
- new release with 0.10 major/minor
- added mpegstream
* Sat Nov 12 2005 Thomas Vander Stichele thomas at apestaart dot org
- new release
* Tue Oct 25 2005 Thomas Vander Stichele thomas at apestaart dot org
- 0.9.4-0.gst.1
- added a52dec plugin
- new release
* Mon Oct 03 2005 Thomas Vander Stichele thomas at apestaart dot org
- 0.9.3-0.gst.1
- new release
- add -devel and -docs
* Fri Sep 02 2005 Thomas Vander Stichele thomas at apestaart dot org
- clean out for split into ugly
* Mon Feb 14 2005 Christian Schaller christian at fluendo dot com
- Add vnc plugin
* Wed Jan 19 2005 Christian Schaller christian at fluendo dot com
- add dv1394 plugin
* Wed Dec 22 2004 Christian Schaller christian at fluendo dot com
- Add -plugins- to plugin names
* Thu Dec 9 2004 Christian Schaller christian a fluendo dot com
- Add the mms plugin
* Wed Oct 06 2004 Christian Schaller christian at fluendo dot com
- Add Wim's new mng decoder plugin
- add shout2 plugin for Zaheer, hope it is correctly done :)
* Wed Sep 29 2004 Christian Schaller uraeus at gnome dot org
- Fix USE statement for V4L2
* Thu Sep 28 2004 Christian Schaller uraeus at gnome dot org
- Remove kio plugin (as it was broken)
* Wed Sep 21 2004 Christian Schaller uraeus at gnome dot org
- Reorganize SPEC to fit better with fedora.us and freshrpms.net
Re: [ATrpms-devel] YafaRay
Hi, On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi Axel, Do you want a package if it is already in Fedora? everything that adds value to the people pulling the packages is OK. If it is breaking something, then not, of course. More concrete on the yafaray bits: These are all from Paulo, and I forget what the history was, but I think he had a hard time getting the packages with upstream (Fedora) to import/work properly. yum list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 Available Packages YafaRay-blender.x86_64 0.1.1-8.fc19 fedora blender.x86_64 1:2.67b-1.fc19 updates-testing # yum --showduplicates list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 YafaRay-blender.x86_640.1.1-6.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.64a-3.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.67a-2.fc18 updates blender.x86_641:2.67b-1.fc18 updates-testing Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux
Hi, On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 03:56:37PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi Axel, Looked at avidemux (avidemux-2.5.6-30.src.rpm) and it compiled fine on both f18 and f19 :-) didn't do a thing. It should had failed - the specfile requires BuildRequires: /bin/arch which now lives under /usr/bin. Maybe the symlinks of existing packages save the day, but in a clean chroot it doesn't pull in the right packages. A solution would be to not use file provides, but packages provides. I used file provides because the package name changed from util-linux to coreutils, but perhaps all supported distros for avidemux are just on coreutils by now. It is a bit old, so perhaps I will try to upgrade to version 2.6.4 later in the weekend. That sounds great, I'll hold off from rebuilding the older one in case you do upload a fresher version, thanks!! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] mpg123 1.15.4 available
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 07:58:02AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpg123-1.15.4-1.el6.src.rpm Thanks, in the build queue, will appear later on dl.atrpms.net. Axel, nvidia-graphics319.23-kmdl-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6-319.23-156.el6. x86_64.rpmnvidia-graphics319.23-kmdl-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6-319.23-156.el6. x86_64.rpm seems to be missing in ATrpms ... How is it missing? I just checked and it's in dl and packages. Permissions look good. I didn't try to install it, though. Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] mythtv doesn't like newer nvidia drivers or vica versa
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 07:31:35PM +1000, Collier Family wrote: On 24/05/2013 3:26 PM, Duncan Brown wrote: On 23/05/2013 17:24, Axel Thimm wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:33:29AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: # Video Output Support x11 support yes xrandr supportyes xv supportyes VDPAU support yes VAAPI support yes CrystalHD support yes OpenGL video yes MHEG support yes libass subtitle support yes (I did have to change the spec dependancy to nvidia-graphics-long-lived-devel obviously) I found out that by now (2013) mythtv does not need any nvidia libs present to build with all the options, so I ripped them from the last build and everything works smoothly. :) It's not just a case of missing vdpau packages is it? No, it was using bad nvidia libs, which we seem to not need since quite some time now. E.g. we were making our lifes just miserable. ;) Thanks to whomever removed these dependencies in the mythtv source code. I compiled axels 292 src rpm on a 686 using nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.1.el6.i686 and got # Video Output Support x11 support yes xrandr supportyes xv supportno VDPAU support yes VAAPI support yes CrystalHD support yes OpenGL video yes MHEG support yes libass subtitle support yes no xv support - strange Yes, that seems strange. the build fails at crystal hd - what versions of crystal-hd are you building against? I have libcrystalhd-devel-3.5.1-1_2.el6.i686 I'm using whatver is latest in ATrpms for that distribution. The very latest does not build on all dists. Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Latest mythtv rpms w/o nvidia build dependencies
Hi, the situation as it once was required nvidia libraries to be present to have mythtv activate some of its feature support. The generic or wrapping libs for several of these features are enough to make mythtv build everything we need. At run time the system will use whatever exists. So we are not losing anything by removing the dependencies to the nvidia libs at build time. So the dependencies have been removed and the latest builds are done in an nvidia free build environment. The result is that all features are still there are and working as if built against a sane set of nvidia libs. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] mythtv doesn't like newer nvidia drivers or vica versa
Hi, On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:33:29AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: As it is the same for 0.24, 0.25 and 0.26 and even on all platforms, especially on el6 which didn't change that much, I really now suspect the newer nvidia drivers. To test this I will try to rebuild against the same drivers I used previously. At least that will diagnose this part. OK, looks like the newer nvidia drivers are not suited for building mythtv against. I downgraded to 302.17 and the builds are fine again. I wonder whether all nvidia hardware accelleration bits would still work in mythtv if I would not build at all against an nvidia driver. I'm moving this discussion to atrpms-devel. @@ -1489,9 +1492,9 @@ mysql-devel x86_64 5.1.61-4.el6 release 127 k mysql-libsx86_64 5.1.61-4.el6 release 1.2 M nasm x86_64 2.07-7.el6 release 385 k - nvidia-graphics-devel x86_64 4:313.30-69at2 9.7 k - nvidia-graphics313.30-devel x86_64 313.30-187.el6 at2 13 k - nvidia-graphics313.30-libsx86_64 313.30-187.el6 at2 22 M + nvidia-graphics-devel x86_64 4:302.17-68at2 9.6 k + nvidia-graphics302.17-devel x86_64 302.17-147.el6 at2 74 k + nvidia-graphics302.17-libsx86_64 302.17-147.el6 at2 18 M opencore-amr-develx86_64 0.1.3-1.el6at 6.2 k openjpeg-libs x86_64 1.3-7.el6 release 59 k openssl-devel x86_64 1.0.0-20.el6_2.5 release 1.1 M @@ -1992,9 +1997,9 @@ mysql-devel.x86_64 0:5.1.61-4.el6 mysql-libs.x86_64 0:5.1.61-4.el6 nasm.x86_64 0:2.07-7.el6 - nvidia-graphics-devel.x86_64 4:313.30-69 - nvidia-graphics313.30-devel.x86_64 0:313.30-187.el6 - nvidia-graphics313.30-libs.x86_64 0:313.30-187.el6 + nvidia-graphics-devel.x86_64 4:302.17-68 + nvidia-graphics302.17-devel.x86_64 0:302.17-147.el6 + nvidia-graphics302.17-libs.x86_64 0:302.17-147.el6 opencore-amr-devel.x86_64 0:0.1.3-1.el6 openjpeg-libs.x86_64 0:1.3-7.el6 openssl-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.0-20.el6_2.5 @@ -2661,10 +2667,10 @@ x11 support yes xrandr supportyes xv supportyes -VDPAU support no -VAAPI support no +VDPAU support yes +VAAPI support yes CrystalHD support yes -OpenGL video no +OpenGL video yes MHEG support yes libass subtitle support yes -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] libbluray-xine-plugin
Hi, yes, I commented out the build as it was failing. cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune= generic -I../../src -O2 -fPIC -Wall -D_REENTRANT -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -c -o input_blura y.o input_bluray.c input_bluray.c: In function 'clear_overlay': input_bluray.c:197: error: 'osd_object_t' has no member named 'area_touched' input_bluray.c: In function 'open_overlay': input_bluray.c:224: error: 'XINE_OSD_CAP_ARGB_LAYER' undeclared (first use in this function) input_bluray.c:224: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once input_bluray.c:224: error: for each function it appears in.) input_bluray.c: In function 'overlay_proc': [...] On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:22:54AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Axel, libbluray-xine-plugin has to be recretated for libbluray 3.0.5 ... Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] dovecot
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:53:59PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I have a machine following f19, are the spec-files for f18 in good shape? because if they are I can start to see if they will compile there... probably the reason people use ATrpms is for the good shape of packages, so yes, they are in quite good shape, and while I haven't looked into the major changes in f19, I'm quite confident that they will rebuilt quite fine against current development/19 repos. That is a fact that I can follow 100%, but there are a number of packages that has not been available (compiled) for f18. Among them is gstreamer-plugins-ugly, spamassassin and avidemux. Yes, that's true - what I meant is that the packages update to f18 should be building fine on f19. There are some important packages that don't build as is on f18, so that's next. There are already some f19 packages on dl.atrpms.net ... :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] atrpms-rpm-config for rhel6
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:30:05AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: On 17/05/13 22:05, John Pilkington wrote: On 17/05/13 20:35, Axel Thimm wrote: thanks for the repost - on el6 both depmod and ldconfig are pulled from the proper locations, in the last days I built tons of packages and could not see the issue. There was an issue with f18 builds, but never with el6. Thanks, Axel. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: Hi Axel: Welcome back. I'm replying to the gossamer-threads version, so no thread. Copy of Stephen Collier's post on users' list, 9 April: The macro on line 79 of /etc/rpm/macros.atrpms doesn't seem to be working properly. Needed for F18 I guess. I have temporary changed it to build with /usr/sbin/ldconfig changed back to /sbin/ldconfig and same for depmod a few lines later. Cheers, John P I certainly saw this problem. It looks as if 'our' target environments weren't being recognised as el6. Mine was Scientific Linux, or perhaps CentOS. Would be nice to fix it for future use, but not immediately critical if the 'official' builds are ok. /etc/redhat-release contains Scientific Linux release 6.4 (Carbon) (without quotes), so it's not recognised in the first few lines of macros.atrpms and gets the Fedora 18 default? You are right, the distro is considered unknown (so clones are not 100% clones) and gets the default setting (which is not f18, just the default, which on the other hand is always the latest convention, so effectively the latest Fedora release). You can do two things: a) fast and lazy: pass dist to the build like so: rpmbuild ... --define 'dist el6' ... (actually this is the way ATrpms does it - especialy since the minimal chroots don't even contain /etc/redhat-release to have something to recognize the dist with) b) extend the %distinitials macro to include more RHEL clones. We would need a strings to grep for in some /etc/*release|issue file as well as the versioning of the matching package (e.g. rpm -qf /etc/redhat-release) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] dovecot
Hi, On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 09:53:55AM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi Axel, I'm sure that they do, as I only added what was needed to get it to compile and package all files. You just too fast - I wanted to send clamav too - but you had done i too before I got there! I have a machine following f19, are the spec-files for f18 in good shape? because if they are I can start to see if they will compile there... probably the reason people use ATrpms is for the good shape of packages, so yes, they are in quite good shape, and while I haven't looked into the major changes in f19, I'm quite confident that they will rebuilt quite fine against current development/19 repos. I guess soon we'll officially start building against f19. Features are 100% and the beta is just a few days ahead. Thanks for the good repo!!! - I will go play with upgrading to mythtv-0.26 on my f17 machine :-) Great!!! Let's know how that works out! Regards, Kim On 19-05-2013 09:22, Axel Thimm wrote: Thanks Kim, I had already uploaded new packages. Can you check whether they already have your changes? ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] f19 builds (was: dovecot)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 08:23:50PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 09:53:55AM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I have a machine following f19, are the spec-files for f18 in good shape? because if they are I can start to see if they will compile there... probably the reason people use ATrpms is for the good shape of packages, so yes, they are in quite good shape, and while I haven't looked into the major changes in f19, I'm quite confident that they will rebuilt quite fine against current development/19 repos. I guess soon we'll officially start building against f19. Features are 100% and the beta is just a few days ahead. actually I felt bit challenged to setup f19 support and just did so. An interesting new feature of rpm in f19 is that it checks changelog dates and spits out warnings if the day of the week doesn't match the given date! :) Other than that some test builds of ffmpeg for example seem to work well. I'll let the builders running, and we'll see what will come out of them. The usual fast bootstrap procedure with new Fedora releases is to allow building against the previous release, e.g. in this case offer the ATrpms packages from f18, so that in theory one pass will do everything. Then to make sure all is self-sustained the builds are redone w/o the f18 repo present. So at the end the packages are build only against f19 bits. As f19 != f19, e.g the beta is not to be assumed to be the same as the GA, the same procedure applies to the GA: Once the packages are known to be frozen on the upstream repo, e.g. there are only installer and mirroring preparations going on, all f19 packages will be rebuilt with their final fc19 tag. Previous tags will look like fc18.something. Have fun! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] atrpms-rpm-config for rhel6
Hi, thanks for the repost - on el6 both depmod and ldconfig are pulled from the proper locations, in the last days I built tons of packages and could not see the issue. There was an issue with f18 builds, but never with el6. Thanks, Axel. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: Hi Axel: Welcome back. I'm replying to the gossamer-threads version, so no thread. Copy of Stephen Collier's post on users' list, 9 April: The macro on line 79 of /etc/rpm/macros.atrpms doesn't seem to be working properly. Needed for F18 I guess. I have temporary changed it to build with /usr/sbin/ldconfig changed back to /sbin/ldconfig and same for depmod a few lines later. Cheers, John P ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mp3splt, audacious and xbmc
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 07:15:52AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: both came from fusion: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/rtmpdump-2.4-0.2.20110811gitc58cfb3e.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libshairport-1.2.1-2.20121218git16395d8.fc17.src.rpm Well, we're not fusion. ;) Even if you lend something from another repo, if it enters ATrpms it should be as good of a quality as if you had written it yourself. :) However, the real problem is afps-ng, which has a wrong include path in afp.h. I fixed the package: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/afpfs-ng-0.8.1-9.fc17.4.src.rpm The new afps-ng only affects the building. You do not need to supply it on ATrpms. You can use it only in your building environment, if you prefer... Anything that is needed for builds is shipped as well, so it will become a full package. Thanks! On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 12:16:15AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmp3splt-0.8.2-12.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-2.5.2-12.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.8.2-12.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xbmc-12.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks, all build. but xbmc, there are some missing packages like libshairport-devel and librtmp-devel (the latter is probably rtmpdump-devel I think). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] mythtv 0.26 on f17
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:39:20PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: On 2013-05-17 07:06, Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 05:57:08PM +0100, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I have been able to build mythtv version 0.26 on f17. I stated with this src.rpm: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/mythtv-0.26.0-291.src.rpm added a line to the spec-file with: BuildRequires: qtwebkit-devel and it compiled. Didn't you hit on the zeromq issue? Or did you just build for i386? Hi Axel - pleased to have you back!! No I only built on i368 I tried to build x86_64 on f18 - but too many of the other packages did not build there so I ended giving up. I'm just freshening up the mythtv builds. It looks like neither 0.26, not 0.27 have a fix for that, so I'm trying some local patches. I think it's the only thing keeping these packages back. Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] atrpms-rpm-config for rhel6
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:42:42PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Only 160 K?? I hadn't noticed the size (just that it was non-zero). Yes, that looks sick, too. I'll rebuild and check the old logs. Thanks for catching it! On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:23:08PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: The problem was not building, but installing ... The kmdl generated had an explicit dependency on /usr/bin/depmod, at least the one I compiled some time ago. Yes, I did check teh runtime dependencies, we're on the same side here. Perhaps you had this issue on f118 and not el6? On f18 it would create that dependency. Clearly, this package is also broken, because its size is too small: http://dl.atrpms.net/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics319.17-kmdl-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6-319.17-155.el6.x86_64.rpm When I try to download it, I get an ERROR 403: Forbidden. Can you recreate it? Thanks. That's another issue - the package is there and looks ok, but the permissions are off. Hm, I need to check the scripts. Thanks!! On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, thanks for the repost - on el6 both depmod and ldconfig are pulled from the proper locations, in the last days I built tons of packages and could not see the issue. There was an issue with f18 builds, but never with el6. Thanks, Axel. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: Hi Axel: Welcome back. I'm replying to the gossamer-threads version, so no thread. Copy of Stephen Collier's post on users' list, 9 April: The macro on line 79 of /etc/rpm/macros.atrpms doesn't seem to be working properly. Needed for F18 I guess. I have temporary changed it to build with /usr/sbin/ldconfig changed back to /sbin/ldconfig and same for depmod a few lines later. Cheers, John P ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] atrpms-rpm-config for rhel6
Hi, can you point me to the broken package? For el6 it should use /sbin/depmod, and the macros seem to do so. Thanks! On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:53:33AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Axel, the new version of the atrpms-rpm-config sets the wrong requirement (path) for depmod on rhel6 ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] vlc 2.0.6 and libdvdcss 1.2.13
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 09:21:44PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.0.6-6.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvdcss-1.2.13-7.fc17.src.rpm Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] nvidia driver does not compile for kernel 3.7.3 - fix
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 06:30:04PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Simpler fix: cd /usr/src/kernels/3.7.9-101.fc17.x86_64/include/linux ln -s ../generated/uapi/linux/version.h . Thanks, this did not just nuke the nvidia builds, but almost all kmdls. Compile normally, then ... latest stable version: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics310.32-310.32-154.fc17.src.rpm Thanks. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] mythtv 0.26 on f17
Hi, On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 05:57:08PM +0100, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I have been able to build mythtv version 0.26 on f17. I stated with this src.rpm: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/mythtv-0.26.0-291.src.rpm added a line to the spec-file with: BuildRequires: qtwebkit-devel and it compiled. Didn't you hit on the zeromq issue? Or did you just build for i386? Word of warning though I HAVE NOT INSTALLED the resulting packages yet. I will probably try at some point - but I have not yet. And I might want to upgrade to a newer set of upstream sources. I tried the same on a F18-beta box, but there at too many missing required packages :-( might find more time later. The recipe here just in case somebody needs it more that I do. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] ATrpms downtime
Dear all, there is some unexpected downtime at ATrpms' resources including all hosted projects. It looks like an external attacker was exploiting a git vulnerabilty that leads to a DoS. A similar issue apparently happened last month to github itself. Unfortunately there is no remote management possibilty and I have to always ask hands on site to fix the issue (many thanks to Jens Dreger both for providing the hosting and for helping with such issues!). Until we find a solution we cannot open the web/git services ATM as the system will go down within a couple of hours again. A cleaner solution would be to virtualize the services, and be able to manage them from the host. Also we apparently need something like cgroups to contain services or at the very least reserve resources for ssh access. I'll try my best to restore services as soon as possible w/o endangering another full downtime. Any disussion on this topic should please happen on atrpms-devel. Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.2.3 working for F17
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 07:34:55PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.2.3-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.2.3-1.fc14.src.rpm This version uses gtk3 by default ... Should this be built only for F17? Or are there bconds inside that should be set for the not gtk3 platforms? Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] About xine-lib 1.2.1
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:29:31AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I built xine-lib 1.2.1: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xine-lib-1.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm However, kde is linked against libxine.so.1(), from the previous 1.1 xine-lib series. To supply a compatibility package would be a solution, but there are also several plugins to be taken into account. I did not test this new xine-lib package, but maybe someone else is interested in doing it. I tried to build it for all dists the previous xine-lib built - it fails for F15 and EL5. The successful builds are under bleeding. Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New opencore-amr and gstreamer-ffmpeg
Hi, On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:54:13AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/opencore-amr-0.1.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Thanks, built and uploaded for all. gstreamer-ffmpeg requires gstreamer = 0.10.31. Therefore, it will *NOT build* for rhel6 (gstreamer 0.10.29). OK. http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vo-aacenc-0.1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vo-amrwbenc-0.1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Danke, thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] 0.25-rc released
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:43:07AM -0400, Brian Long wrote: Looks like 0.25 release candidate has been released... Thanks for the info! It will not be that different for the current packages in bleeding, I wonder whether to push another update soon, or wait until the weekend of 24/25, so more bits are in place. Opinions? -- Forwarded message -- From: Gavin Hurlbut gjhur...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:24 AM Subject: [mythtv-users] 0.25-rc released To: Discussion about mythtv mythtv-us...@mythtv.org Cc: Development of mythtv mythtv-...@mythtv.org The tagging and releasing of 0.25-rc has been completed. If all goes well, final release of 0.25 is planned for Apr 2, 2012. ___ mythtv-users mailing list mythtv-us...@mythtv.org http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Alsa 1.0.25 EL6 needs rebuilding with sequencer support like 1.0.24 series/native alsa
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 09:57:27PM +, Simon Putt wrote: Yeah I compared the two rpms together and a number of .ko files are missing, like snd-midi and snd-opl3-synth which i need. I think this is due to --- alsa-driver-1.0.24/toplevel.config 2011-01-27 14:59:35.0 +0100 +++ alsa-driver-1.0.25/toplevel.config 2012-01-25 10:29:28.0 +0100 [...] -CONFIG_SND_RAWMIDI_SEQ=m -CONFIG_SND_OPL3_LIB_SEQ=m +CONFIG_SND_RAWMIDI_SEQ= +CONFIG_SND_OPL3_LIB_SEQ= I can't say why this change was made. Maybe there is a new access method? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] alsa-lib 1.0.24 and rhel6
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:22:03AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 06:04:11AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:39:02AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Just for the records... installing alsa-lib 1.0.24 on rhel6 breaks flash plugin pulse support. BTW, what about 1.0.25? Is there an alsa-lib 1.0.25 in ATrpms? I am using alsa-driver 1.0.25 on rhel6, but the problem is alsa-lib, not alsa-driver... Alsa-lib 1.0.24 was a no go regarding flash support. No, there is no 1.0.25 lib in ATrpms (yet) as the demand is usually for newer drivers (only). But the libs could easily be built if they could solve such an issue. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Alsa 1.0.25 EL6 needs rebuilding with sequencer support like 1.0.24 series/native alsa
Hi, On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 07:55:25PM +, Simon Putt wrote: Hiya I've tracked down why i cant get midi working with your alsa 1.0.25 kmdl's, they are not build with sequencer support, whilst the 1.0.24 series and the native EL6 kernel alsa are. so this is a request for a rebuild, thanks. Simon Putt which kmdls are these? I checked for example alsa-driver-kmdl-2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64-1.0.25-94.el6.x86_64.rpm and the option --with-sequencer=yes is passed and the build responds with [...] checking for sequencer support... yes [...] But maybe something is broken with the sequencer in 1.0.25. There were some changes, maybe they affect your midi app? http://alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Changes_v1.0.24_v1.0.25#ALSA_sequencer -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] vlc plugin
Hi, On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 08:50:21AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Hi, Axel this is the new vlc plugin for firefox: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/npapi-vlc-2.0.0-0.1gita721049.fc12.src.rpm It is working fine with firefox 10.0.1 (my F12 runs firefox from rhel6). Thanks, build for all but f16/f17 (in the queue still). Some people have emailed me about the missing plugin, so here it is. And what about vlc for F15? It is no there ... still having problems? No, it just took a while for all distros to build. And there was a new mythtv and a kernel-tuxonice package in the queue as well. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] alsa-lib 1.0.24 and rhel6
Hi, On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:39:02AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Just for the records... installing alsa-lib 1.0.24 on rhel6 breaks flash plugin pulse support. Therefore, using flash via firefox or chrome precludes any other application of gaining control of the sound card. If flash/firefox really use pulse how does switching alsa affect this? Perhaps the flash plugin is still using alsa directly? Which flash plugin are you using, the one that RHEL ships or the offcial one? Thanks! I have been struggling with this problem for a long time, and the only solution is reinstalling the original alsa-lib 1.0.22 from RedHat. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] libbluray 0.2.1
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:31:51PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libbluray-0.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] audacious plugins x86_64 missing on rhel6
Hi, On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 05:27:20PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I noticed that audacious plugins (3.2 and 3.1.2) x86_64 are missing on rhel6. Any problem? I am using them here just fine ... I hope all is well now! :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mp3splt suite
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:03:39PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I patched the configure.ac file and mp3splt-gtk also builds for rhel6 now. Just use --without gtk3 Great! I hope all bits are OK now! :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] ampache for F15 and F16
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 08:43:24AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ampache-3.5.4-12.fc14.src.rpm Thanks! The only problem was that Requires(hint) is no longer supported ... Yes, it was rather short lived. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] /usr/lib/rpm/atrpms/find-unamer.sh: No such file or directory
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 08:19:02AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: It seems that atrpms-rpm-config-196-1.noarch is missing something ... Thanks, it was in the sources but the install script messed it up. BTW the new atrpms macros have some nice updates: a) no cosmetic issues with recursions more than older rpms like b) kmdls now have the hooks that are required to use them on driver disks. E.g. you can throw them onto a RHEL6 update disk during installation to support installations from not-yet-supported network cards, storage devices etc. and anaconda will autodetect that these packages need to be installed during the installation procedure and modprobed. I needed it to add atl1e support for some unsupported cards like the one in my laptop. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.2
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 08:44:21AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.2-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Packages absent in your last build
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:09:58AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:14:35AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I noticed that ampache is missing in F15 and F16, and probably you forgot to activate it, because it was missing since the beginning of these fedora releases. audacious-plugins is missing in rhel6. mp3splt-gtk is missing in F15 and F16, and they build fine here. Since F15 and F16 possess a working gtk3, I just built mp3splt-gtk with no special option, because the defaults are fine in this case. avidemux is missing in F16 (built fine here). kradio4 is missing in rhel6 (built fine here). This is an updated version I submitted some time ago: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.2.1-2.fc14.src.rpm but 4.0.3 should be out soon, and if you wish it can be built only in rhel6 (the other releases can wait for 4.0.3). I fixed almost all of these, if a package is still missing it didn't build on that distribution. :/ -- mp3splt-gtk is missing on F15 and F16, but they build fine with the default options. Can you check what was the problem? The build error (f16-x86_64) is gcc -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPIXMAP_PATH=\/usr/share/pixmaps\ -DIMAGEDIR=\/usr/share/mp3splt-gtk\ -I. -I.. -DGSEAL_ENABLE -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0 -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/libmp3splt -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0/include -pthread -I/usr/include/gstreamer-0.10 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -DGTK_DISABLE_SINGLE_INCLUDES -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGSEAL_ENABLE -c dialog_helper.c gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -DGTK_DISABLE_SINGLE_INCLUDES -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGSEAL_ENABLE -laudclient -lm -o mp3splt-gtk tree_tab.o main_win.o xmms_control.o gstreamer_control.o player.o player_tab.o preferences_tab.o utilities.o split_files.o freedb_tab.o snackamp_control.o special_split.o mp3splt-gtk.o multiple_files.o messages.o import.o options_manager.o preferences_manager.o widgets_helper.o combo_helper.o radio_helper.o export.o ui_manager.o dialog_helper.o -pthread -lgtk-3 -lgdk-3 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lcairo-gobject -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -L/usr/lib -lmp3splt -lm -laudclient -pthread -lgstbase-0.10 -lgstreamer-0.10 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lxml2 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 gstreamer_control.o: In function `memset': /usr/include/bits/string3.h:82: warning: memset used with constant zero length parameter; this could be due to transposed parameters /usr/bin/ld: xmms_control.o: undefined reference to symbol 'dbus_g_bus_get' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'dbus_g_bus_get' is defined in DSO /usr/lib64/libdbus-glib-1.so.2 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib64/libdbus-glib-1.so.2: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [mp3splt-gtk] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/repot-build/BUILD/mp3splt-gtk-0.7.1/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/repot-build/BUILD/mp3splt-gtk-0.7.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1bri5x (%build) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New libdvbpsi
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 06:09:29PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 02:48:59PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm Axel, the previous version was really broken. Some dvb-t channels did no even tune in ... Could you also send the src.rpm? :) -- This is the one that works (the broken is 0.2.1): http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm It is still not a src.rpm. :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] mpd ffmpeg fix
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 14:25 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: This is kind of important, because the previous version was crashing all the time because of ffmpeg ... Thanks, done! -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux 2.5.5 for rhel6
Hi, On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 06:17 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: you need to update cmake to 2.8.4 for building avidemux 2.5.5 on rhel ... Thanks for the tip! It still failed and I think at the same point it failed with the older cmake. -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New avidemux and audacious
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 09:28 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-2.5.4-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-2.5.4-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.5.5-29.fc14.src.rpm Thanks! -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.0.1
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:14 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I think audacious 2.5.4 can go to stable and audacious 3.0.1. to testing: OK, did so. There was a minor update to 3.0.x a day or two after you posted this, so I picked that up as well. Thanks! -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] clamav released in new version
Hi,
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:42 +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
Thanks for getting F15 support up this fast! Next time Fedora updates
please post on the blog what you plan to do in general to the packages
(like adding systemd), then I will try to help out with recompiling f15
packages in the beta phase.
Thanks! Actually many of the planned changes just popped up during
package builds, e.g. there was no real planning, but we'll get there. :)
The place to look for upcoming changes in Fedora is
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/16/FeatureList
Not all features make it and not all make it as advertized (e.g. F15 was
originally supposed to be systemd w/o any legacy initscripts, but the
time constraints were to stringent).
There is a new version of clamav - 0.97.1:
I have changed the version number and added this line to the files section:
%{_mandir}/man1/clambc.1*
Thanks, building now.
--
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] F15 Repo Config Rpm's
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 00:33 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: On Saturday 11 June 2011 02:43:15 Axel Thimm wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 21:35 -0700, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: How long before we see the F15 configuration rpms for atrpms available for download? I never do a new fedora install without adding the atrpms repo package before any updates are done. I consider it an integral part of every install. :) Thanks! :) BTW the old repo file was automatically diverting to f15 upon the upgrade for yum. Only the smart and apt configs are really changing. -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Is ffmpeg 0.7.-44.rc1 compatible?
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 15:18 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Anyway, the official version is 0.7 and 0.6.3 is not intended for production, right? Well, official as in currently-used-in-ATrpms. It seems to work well under all F15 related bits, but OTOH not everything has been rebuilt against ffmpeg 0.7, yet. The list of packages *directly* built on ffmpeg is: audacious-plugins.spec avifile.spec blender.spec cinelerra.spec gst-ffmpeg-0.10.6.spec gstreamer-ffmpeg.spec gstreamer-vaapi.spec kradio4.spec libquicktime.spec motion.spec mpd.spec transcode.spec vlc.spec xine-lib.spec xvidcap.spec -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Missing ':' in dovecot.spec for 1_128.f14
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 13:56 +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: On installing a recompiled f14 dovecot package on f15 I got this error: Updating : 1:dovecot-2.0.13-1_128.fc15.i686 Looks like a missing ':' at the end of the systemctl line :-) Thanks! Fixed! -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] clamav for f14/f15 with systemd
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 12:00 +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I have messed around a bit with the f14 clamav spec-file, as to get it to work on f15 - basically adding tmpfiles.d config. I have attached the spec-file and tmpfiles config. Thanks, all in the repo by now! -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] F15 Repo Config Rpm's
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 21:35 -0700, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: How long before we see the F15 configuration rpms for atrpms available for download? I haven't yet had a thorough test of all f15 features in ATrpms (I'm mainly fighting with gnome-shell to reproduce my previous environment to some extend ...), so I haven't even announced support for it. I added some more packages including the repo package, but I'm still holding off the announcement until I've really managed to properly work under f15. -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Is ffmpeg 0.7.-44.rc1 compatible?
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 14:39 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I have on my system ffmpeg 0.6.3. I this the snapshot that ATrpms was shipping, or the real thing? When I tried to execute audacious 2.5.1 from ATrpms blleding, I get: audacious: relocation error: /usr/lib64/audacious/Input/ffaudio.so: symbol av_register_protocol2, version LIBAVFORMAT_52 not defined in file libavformat.so.52 with link time reference I suppose audacious has been linked against 0.7 rc1, right? Is it incompatible with the 0.6 series? 0.7 is a rebranding of what was previously in ATrpms as a 0.6.x snapshot for several months, so the previous ffmpeg support in ATrpms is probably much closer to 0.7 than 0.6.3. But I guess testing it in the field will really prove whether it is compatible or not. -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Atrpms-repo for F15
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 17:52 -0700, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: Thanks to you and the crew for the hard work to get the F15 packages + repo configuration up. Much appreciated. :) You are welcome, as written in a post a couple of moments ago, f15 support at ATrpms is still a bit semi-official, which shouldn't hold you from reporting any issues (or even successes ;) -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Is ffmpeg 0.7.-44.rc1 compatible?
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 07:17 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 14:39 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I have on my system ffmpeg 0.6.3. I this the snapshot that ATrpms was shipping, or the real thing? Is 0.6.3 from ATrpms. I am kind of lost here. Why do we have 3 versions in the repo? Because different parts of ATrpms were built against different versions. For example there was this issue with libavcore where you provided an old lib for someone on RHEL something. The old (compatibility) libs need to get phased out, of course, but this need to done at a safe pace. I also like to keep a couple of old versions around for users to be able to downgrade to a previous version in case they encounter an issue. This makes debugging easier. Note that 0.6.3 and 0.7rc1 at ATrpms were built simultaneously, and therefore 0.6.3 have never been actually used in any build. If I compile audacious myself with 0.6.3 installed, it works. If I download it from ATrpms or build it with mock, I get the reported error (mock should pick 0.7, right?). Yes, I wonder why you did get 0.6.3 at all. As said the two packages came simultaneously, so any build should by default only see 0.7rc1. I built 0.6.3 as a possible fallback in case 0.7rc1 messes things up, but things look OK. Why am I not using 0.7? Because as soon as I installed it, mplayer, which I used for watching analog TV, started to freeze my computer. Maybe it was just a coincidence, because I live near the ocean, and my computer was completed corroded by humidity and salt. It must have been a coincidence, because mplayer is not using the external ffmpeg, it uses a bundled one. Anyway, I ended up replacing my mobo, processor, and video card, and the computer is stable again, but I am still using 0.6.3, just for safety ... Does the libavformat error mean anything to you? You mean the missing symbol? It is as you had written, audacious-plugins had been built against 0.7rc1 and didn't like that some symbols/resources were not present anymore. -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New alsa-driver for rhel6
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 11:23 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: It also affects all RHEL5 kernels but the very latest. RHEL is a slow upgrading platform for most users, so the support of at least a few kernels is a must. But rhel5 still uses the kernel 2.6.18. Sorry, this was a typo, I meant RHEL6. The change was just lowering from kernel 2.6.35/2.6.37 to 2.6.32. It should affect only F12 (2.6.32), F13 (2.6.34) and previous rhel6 versions only. I do not see how rhel5 was affected By the way. I do not understand why the driver is in bleeding. Mainly because it is breaking RHEL6.0, but the older driver is breaking 6.1, so both are flawed ATM. :/ -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New alsa-driver for rhel6
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:21 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I see what is happening. F12 and F13 also use kernel 2.6.32. However, their kernels have not been patched by RedHat. Therefore, the adriver patch should not be applied to F12 and F13. The simplest way is adding a bcond something. Nonetheless, F12 is dead and F13 is going to die soon. Should we just let them rest in peace?? It also affects all RHEL5 kernels but the very latest. RHEL is a slow upgrading platform for most users, so the support of at least a few kernels is a must. Axel, I did not have any problem creating the i686 version for rhel6 with mock: [...] There must be something at your side ... This is normal, if the x86_64 builds fail the other archs are not even tried in the default build mode. I initiated a i386 build which at least produced the package for the latest kernel. Still the package should ATM also build on the non patched kernels. I didn't have time to find a good fix, but it doesn't sound too difficult. -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Packages missing on F15
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 06:47 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: there are some packages missing on F15. Hera are some of them: mpd, dvdrip, gnormalize, darkice, darksnow, fixsrt, glui, icegenerator, imwheel, motion, mp3wrap, normalize, unrar, unace. Also, CGAL 3.8 is missing for F14, which still supplies version 3.6 on Fedora. Thanks. I tried to build and push all of them. :) -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New gnormalize for F15
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:35 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/gnormalize-0.63-10.fc14.src.rpm Hint is no longer allowed on an F15 spec file Thanks! -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New CGAL, mpd and libdvbpsi
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Thanks, http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.16.2-18.fc14.src.rpm thanks, http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/CGAL-3.8-1.fc14.src.rpm thanks! ;) -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New alsa-driver for rhel6
Hi, On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 09:16 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 18:58 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/alsa-driver-1.0.24-90.el6.src.rpm The new rhel6 kernel requires lowering the kernel version from 35 to 32 ... this package doesn't build for.all other RHEL6 kernels and also not for f13. Is there a way to make it build everywhere again? The builds that did succeed are in bleeding. -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New alsa-driver for rhel6
Hi, On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 18:58 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/alsa-driver-1.0.24-90.el6.src.rpm this update removes a patch that was needed for at least f14. :) -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Any chance for nvidia.270 RPM?
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 20:28 -0700, Fedor Pikus wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: I'm building 270.30 and placing it in bleeding (since it's beta). any luck with these RPM's? I don't see them in atrpms-bleeding. Sorry they had been built, but I had forgotten to push them into bleeding. Should be available since a week or so. Thanks for poitning this out! Looks like repo is behind: the new F14 kernel 2.6.35.12-90 has no kmdls (in stable or beta/bleeding) for nvidia drivers, but in fact they are there, After downloading them manually from the web site I can install them just fine. The web site with the browsable packages is constructed after the repo. Did you enable bleeding? # yum list --enablerepo=atrpms-bleeding nvidia-graphics270.30-kmdl-2.6.35.12-90.fc14 [...] nvidia-graphics270.30-kmdl-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.x86_64 270.30-134.fc14 atrpms-bleeding -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] nouveau vs nvidia - fresh install, nouveau wins
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 20:36 -0700, Fedor Pikus wrote: The NVidia RPM is configured to blacklist nouveau, which usually does the job of removing it. But recently I ran into the case where it does not work. It goes like this: 1) Do fresh install of F14 (may be others, but that's all I tried). 2) During install, configure F14 update repos 3) After install, add ATRPM repos and install NVidia drivers NVidia module does not load, lsmod shows that nouveau is there. Blacklist does not help, blacklisting nouveau on the boot line does not help, Have you tried nouveau.modeset=0? even removing nouveau.ko does not help. Fedora installer crammed nouveau into initrd! The only solution is to rerun mkinitrd, don't need any special arguments, I think nouveau is not one of the modules mkinitrd adds just because they are loaded when it runs. I think if you update the kernel, the problem goes away because mkinitrd reruns and new initrd does not contain nouveau (this is why, if you don't configure updates, the problem usually does not happen, at least if the kernel is updated before ATRPMs are added). Perhaps the NVidia RPM from ATRPMs should also regenerate initrd using whatever commands the kernel RPM does? -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] nouveau vs nvidia - fresh install, nouveau wins
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 00:26 -0700, Fedor Pikus wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 20:36 -0700, Fedor Pikus wrote: The NVidia RPM is configured to blacklist nouveau, which usually does the job of removing it. But recently I ran into the case where it does not work. It goes like this: 1) Do fresh install of F14 (may be others, but that's all I tried). 2) During install, configure F14 update repos 3) After install, add ATRPM repos and install NVidia drivers NVidia module does not load, lsmod shows that nouveau is there. Blacklist does not help, blacklisting nouveau on the boot line does not help, Have you tried nouveau.modeset=0? Yes, tried that and rdblacklist=nouveau. I think the problem is that initrd is built during the install and is configured for high-resolution text modes, and all modules in initrd are loaded even if they are later not used. I thought these commands would prevent the loading of nouveau from initrd/initram. Try booting into mode 3 or mode 1 and see if the nouveau driver has been loaded (lsmod | grep nouveau). BTW you need both the nouveau.modeset=0 setting *and* the blacklisting at modprobe level, e.g. nouveau needs blacklisting at two levels. I have the above kernel command line option and blacklist nouveau in /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia.conf and didn't have a nouveau/nvidia clash since ever. So I may be able to rmmod nouveau if I disable graphical boot, and then load nvidia, but it requires manual intervention (and does not seem reliable, sometimes nouveau remains with refcount one even when lsmod shows no uses of it). -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] nouveau vs nvidia - fresh install, nouveau wins
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:33 -0400, George Galt wrote: A long time ago, Axel posted instructions on rebuilding initrd, which should (I believe) fix the issue. I can't find the commands now, but perhaps Axel can repost the commands. I think this is what finally fixed the nouveau v nvidia issue for me. I'm still not convinced, as every user out there should be falling in the same trap and we would have tons of reports, not only on ATrpms, or Fedora, but generally for nvidia closed source driver users on distributions with nouveau and kernel mode switching (which should probably be every current distribution out there). Axel, any thoughts on this? The safest way is to pick the latest running kernel and query rpm itself how it was done, as the mkinitrd or equivalents are masked behind wrappers. For example the latest F14 kernel says: $ rpm -q --scripts kernel-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.x86_64 postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): if [ `uname -i` == x86_64 -o `uname -i` == i386 ] [ -f /etc/sysconfig/kernel ]; then /bin/sed -r -i -e 's/^DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel-smp$/DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel/' /etc/sysconfig/kernel || exit $? fi /sbin/new-kernel-pkg --package kernel --install 2.6.35.12-90.fc14.x86_64 || exit $? preuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /sbin/new-kernel-pkg --rminitrd --rmmoddep --remove 2.6.35.12-90.fc14.x86_64 || exit $? posttrans scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /sbin/new-kernel-pkg --package kernel --mkinitrd --dracut --depmod --update 2.6.35.12-90.fc14.x86_64 || exit $? /sbin/new-kernel-pkg --package kernel --rpmposttrans 2.6.35.12-90.fc14.x86_64 || exit $? The interesting bits are the second to the last line in this case. But beware, the scripts' layout can change (they have in the past and will do so in the future), if you - dear reader in the year 2525 running Fedora 10^3 - are reading this use rpm -q --scripts to check on how the initramfs is set up in your time frame. ;) -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Any chance for nvidia.270 RPM?
I'm building 270.30 and placing it in bleeding (since it's beta). any luck with these RPM's? I don't see them in atrpms-bleeding. Sorry they had been built, but I had forgotten to push them into bleeding. Should be available since a week or so. Thanks for poitning this out! -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New vlc 1.1.9
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 20:49 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-1.1.9-69.fc14.src.rpm Thanks! :) By the way, I uploaded all of my rhel6 packages: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/rpms/rpmsel6-x86_64/ That's quite the collection! :) -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Any chance for nvidia.270 RPM?
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 20:22 -0700, Fedor Pikus wrote: The version currently on atrpms does not support 560Ti :( I'm building 270.30 and placing it in bleeding (since it's beta). -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Vlc 1.1.8 available
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 17:34 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: There is a patch for opencv2.2 from F15. Did you disable opencv? Yes, I had. The current version is the one you sent with a minor Release bump to make sure the upgrade path is OK. Thanks! -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Vlc 1.1.8 available
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 08:59 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-1.1.8-68.fc14.src.rpm My version builds for F15 Hi Paulo, by the time you posted the package vlc 1.1.8 was already queued in, had I known there was an update underway I would had waited and saved double efforts. :) Are there any differences in the packages? Actually I just upgraded vlc because I was working on the directfb fiasco anyway, otherwise I'm usually waiting for your upgrades. The packages I queued in did also build for f15. -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Taucs missing from F14 and rhel6
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 18:03 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 08:14 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I noticed that taucs is missing either from F14 or rhel6. I had no problem compiling it for both of them. Thanks, I added them. There are probably more packages that haven't been green-lit fro RHEL6 yet, if you see anything else missing, please poke again. I still do not see: taucs, dvdrip, freepops taucs und freepops should be OK, dvdrip is missing some perl bits still, thanks! -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
