i18n broken in 1.3.2?
I get this when I run my shells in 1.3.2:
Call to undefined method App::path() in /var/www/cake/libs/i18n.php
on line 264
The 1.2 to 1.3 migration guide says:
Configure::read('modelPaths') replaced by App::path('models')
... but i18n.php is a core file. Any ideas?
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: i18n broken in 1.3.2?
If I set core.php to have
Configure::write('debug', 1);
Trouble is, I need this set to 0 for a number of reasons.
On Jun 8, 12:26 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff aarons...@gmail.com wrote:
I get this when I run my shells in 1.3.2:
Call to undefined method App::path() in /var/www/cake/libs/i18n.php
on line 264
The 1.2 to 1.3 migration guide says:
Configure::read('modelPaths') replaced by App::path('models')
... but i18n.php is a core file. Any ideas?
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: i18n broken in 1.3.2?
I discovered the problem was calls to __(...) etc, so it's definitely
a problem with i18n
On Jun 8, 1:04 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff aarons...@gmail.com wrote:
If I set core.php to have
Configure::write('debug', 1);
Trouble is, I need this set to 0 for a number of reasons.
On Jun 8, 12:26 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff aarons...@gmail.com wrote:
I get this when I run my shells in 1.3.2:
Call to undefined method App::path() in /var/www/cake/libs/i18n.php
on line 264
The 1.2 to 1.3 migration guide says:
Configure::read('modelPaths') replaced by App::path('models')
... but i18n.php is a core file. Any ideas?
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Heads up: UUID pimary field can now be stored as binary instead of char
Just a heads up: CakePHP, as of about 2 months ago I think, supports UUIDs as a binary primary field type instead of just char. See: https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/4119 I believe the field length still has to be 36. From this: http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/03/13/to-uuid-or-not-to-uuid/ I think I gather that using the binary field type brings it down to 16 bytes instead of 36 bytes (even though the field length is left at 36?). Take care, Aaron --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Heads up: UUID pimary field can now be stored as binary instead of char
Hrmm, actually from this: http://kekoav.com/blog/36-computers/58-uuids-as-primary-keys-in-mysql.html and this: http://www.mydatabasesupport.com/forums/mysql/246972-uuid-datatype.html ... it seems one really does need to use binary(16) and then perform a hex conversion, otherwise there isn't a performance increase. But CakePHP requires the length of 36 with a binary type. Any thoughts? On May 21, 5:09 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff aarons...@gmail.com wrote: Just a heads up: CakePHP, as of about 2 months ago I think, supports UUIDs as a binary primary field type instead of just char. See: https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/4119 I believe the field length still has to be 36. From this: http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/03/13/to-uuid-or-not-to-uuid/ I think I gather that using the binary field type brings it down to 16 bytes instead of 36 bytes (even though the field length is left at 36?). Take care, Aaron --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Master / Slave Support
Thanks much. I didn't realize the old (and easy) method of doing this
was deprecated.
On Jan 19, 10:04 am, Andreas Hofmann
andreas.hofman...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
we have discovered a way how to realize master/slave support with cake
(also with multiple slaves).
This old post is completely
depricated:http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/58ea010f...
Because Model::find() and Model::save() create the $db-handle lines
before it calles the callbacks 'beforeFind' and 'beforeSave'.
The way we realized is to overwrite the save() and updateAll()
methodes and to set the default db-config in the AppModel::__construct
().
Note: One thing remains: It's not possible to do a bindModel in the
'beforeSave' and 'afterSave' callbacks, because they get the wrong db-
config... If you find a way to do it, please let us know!
1. Define your Database-Configs in app/config/database.php. You should
have master and as much slaves you want to have:
class DATABASE_CONFIG {
var $master = array(
driver' = 'mysql',
'persistent' = false,
'host' = 'localhost',
'login' = 'login',
'password' = 'password',
'database' = 'database',
'encoding' = 'utf8'
);
// Config for Slave #1
var $slave1 = array(
driver' = 'mysql',
'persistent' = false,
'host' = 'slave1',
'login' = 'login',
'password' = 'password',
'database' = 'database',
'encoding' = 'utf8'
);
// Config for Slave #2
var $slave2 = array(
driver' = 'mysql',
'persistent' = false,
'host' = 'slave2',
'login' = 'login',
'password' = 'password',
'database' = 'database',
'encoding' = 'utf8'
);
...
}
2. Create/Alter app/models/app_model.php and create/alter the
constructor '__construct' of it like the following:
class AppModel extends Model {
public function __construct($id = false, $table = null, $ds = null)
{
/**
* USED FOR MASTER/SLAVE MECHANIC *
**/
// If a datasource is set via params, use it and return
if((is_array($id) isset($id['ds'])) || $ds) {
parent::__construct($id, $table, $ds);
return;
}
// Use a static variable, to only use one connection per page-call
(otherwise we would get a new handle every time a Model is created)
static $_useDbConfig;
if(!isset($_useDbConfig)) {
// Get all available database-configs
$sources_list = ConnectionManager::enumConnectionObjects();
// Find the slaves we have
$slaves = array();
foreach($sources_list as $name = $values) {
// Slaves have to be named slave1, slave2, etc...
if(preg_match('/^slave[0-9]+$/i', $name) == 1) {
$slaves[] = $name;
}
}
// Randomly use a slave
$_useDbConfig = $slaves[rand(0, count($slaves) - 1)];
$this-_usedSlave = $_useDbConfig;
}
$this-useDbConfig = $_useDbConfig;
parent::__construct($id, $table, $ds);
}
...
}
This method uses a local static variable to save the db-config
application-wide. It collects all configs from the database.php that
start with slave# and selects a random one for it. This is now the
default-config for the application that is used with every query
done via the Model-class UNTIL we do the next step:
3. We now overwrite the Model::save() and Model::find() methods to use
another database-config for write-queries!
Note: We discovered, that it's not enough to just overwrite Model::save
(), because Model::updateAll() doesn't use the callbacks, neither the
Model::save() method.
function save($data = null, $validate = true, $fieldList = array())
{
// Remember the old config
$oldDb = $this-useDbConfig;
// Set the new config
$this-setDataSource('master');
// Call the original Model::save() method
$return = parent::save($data, $validate, $fieldList);
// Reset the config/datasource
$this-setDataSource($oldDb);
return $return;
}
function updateAll($fields, $conditions = true) {
$oldDb = $this-useDbConfig;
$this-setDataSource('master');
$return = parent::updateAll($fields, $conditions);
$this-setDataSource($oldDb);
return $return;
}
Now you should have full master/slave support within your cake-
application.
The way it works:
When your application is called, the AppModel will be called the first
time and realizes, that the local $_useDbConfig variable is not set.
So it randomly selects one of your slave-configs and sets this to the
default used database-config (AppModel::useDbConfig). Every further
instance of AppModel will recognize that the local $_useDbConfig
variable already exists and will use the same config.
Now every query you do will use this slave-config, EXCEPT all save's
and updateAll's, because you've overwritten these methods to use your
Re: Question about database.php
? :-) On Nov 10, 5:55 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any reason why database.php doesn't follow the Configure:write() format, i.e. why it isn't something Configure::read can read? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Question about database.php
Good question. I want my installer script to create the database.php file in the same way other config files are created. On Nov 11, 11:43 am, Sam Sherlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: whats the reason you want it to work like this? you can define different db connections 2008/11/11 Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? :-) On Nov 10, 5:55 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any reason why database.php doesn't follow the Configure:write() format, i.e. why it isn't something Configure::read can read? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Question about database.php
Any reason why database.php doesn't follow the Configure:write() format, i.e. why it isn't something Configure::read can read? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: CakePHP not recommenable for busy websites?
Yeah, get to know the containable behavior. On Sep 21, 12:35 am, toby78 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am currently evaluating different frameworks and also looking at cakePHP. My first thought was that it seems not very efficient... If you have an object, e.g. User that has other related objects such as Message or Photo - there will be SQL statements to select all content from all related tabled - no matter whether it is used or not. If you have a large database table this could also lead to problems as the query is not pages, but everything is selected at once? There also does not seem to be a caching of database queries? Or is this possible? And if so, how do you define which queries are cached in which intervall? Thanks! Toby --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How do I, from a controller, count the number of queries made?
Any ideas? On Sep 3, 2:18 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do I, from a controller, count the number of queries made? I would like to log the count of queries without using the table that debug=2 prints out. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How do, from a controller, I count the number of queries made?
How do I, from a controller, count the number of queries made? I would like to log the count of queries without using the table that debug=2 prints out. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How do I, from a controller, count the number of queries made?
How do I, from a controller, count the number of queries made? I would like to log the count of queries without using the table that debug=2 prints out. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is migrations support planned for Cake?
It'd be great if schema arrays could include an old_name field, so
that CakePHP could not only create fields and create tables, but
rename them. In other words, something like:
class BlogSchema extends CakeSchema {
public $posts = array(
'id' = array('type' = 'integer', 'null' = false, 'default'
= NULL, 'key' = 'primary'),
'title' = array('type' = 'string', 'null' = false, 'length'
= 100, 'old_name' = 'name'),
'content' = array('type' = 'text', 'null' = false,
'old_name' = 'body'),
'indexes' = array('PRIMARY' = array('column' = 'id',
'unique' = 1))
);
}
Get my drift? If we could somehow tell Cake the history of a
particular table or field, it seems like we could get the best of both
worlds.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cookbook overhaul proposal
Sorry, I wasn't aware that this was up for public discussion because usually we leave these sorts of decisions to people who are actually, you know, doing the work. That's why I gave a proposal, not a demand. And I'd be happy to set up a MediaWiki installation for you and do all the initial setup work. This extension, which will be integrated into Wikipedia in the coming months, allows for people to edit the draft of a page, and for users with a special privilege of reviewer to tweak and approve and even rate the proposed changes. The coming months? How about we put something together ourselves in the coming weeks, or hell, days. It is Cake after all. Shouldn't be too hard assuming we can find the time. Which of course is always the trick. While FlaggedRevs extension will be integrated into Wikipedia in the coming months, it is already available as a working extension for MediaWiki. I use it at Theopedia.com. The Cookbook code or the Cookbook content? The Cookbook code is going to be released under the MIT license, the same as Cake itself. I meant the Cookbook content. Keep in mind, my proposal rids the Cake team of having to do any development work on the wiki application itself. As of this point, they seem to be spending time on the wiki application. I'm not trying to add to their work, but rather lighten the load and address multiple concerns. If you think it is audacious and brash to put forth such a proposal, then... oh well, it was still worth trying. I still appreciate the CakePHP team and all the work they do. Keep up the good work. Take care, Aaron --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cookbook overhaul proposal
I can assure you that the tone wasn't sneering or cocky, it was a sincere, constructive proposal. If you don't like my idea, then shoot it down. No hard feelings. To me, FlaggedRevs seems to make using a wiki all the more attractive. I have suggested abandoning the progressive chapter-breakdown and partitioning large pages, but hadn't (to my knowledge) received any clear specific responses on it. I have suggested using a wiki before, but the main objection I heard was that it once before became unmanageable due to users having the ability to immediately change live content. People were apparently adding unreliable information, too. These past few days I have successfully integrated the FlaggedRevs extension into my own Theopedia.com wiki. It prompted me to write the proposal. I'm aware of the whole we tried a wiki and it didn't work issue, but FlaggedRevs seems to be a great solution to the problems you were having before. Anyways, you guys have voiced your rejection of the wiki+FlaggedRevs idea vehemently and clearly. No need to send any hounds or unholster your guns. :-) On May 13, 9:27 am, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaron, the brashness wasn't in the proposal itself, but in the tone in which it was presented. Also in the fact that you already presented the idea once, and it was rejected unanimously. Add to that the fact that discussions of a wiki, in all it's forms and facets, has already played out numerous times, each with the same conclusion. On May 13, 11:16 am, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I wasn't aware that this was up for public discussion because usually we leave these sorts of decisions to people who are actually, you know, doing the work. That's why I gave a proposal, not a demand. And I'd be happy to set up a MediaWiki installation for you and do all the initial setup work. This extension, which will be integrated into Wikipedia in the coming months, allows for people to edit the draft of a page, and for users with a special privilege of reviewer to tweak and approve and even rate the proposed changes. The coming months? How about we put something together ourselves in the coming weeks, or hell, days. It is Cake after all. Shouldn't be too hard assuming we can find the time. Which of course is always the trick. While FlaggedRevs extension will be integrated into Wikipedia in the coming months, it is already available as a working extension for MediaWiki. I use it at Theopedia.com. The Cookbook code or the Cookbook content? The Cookbook code is going to be released under the MIT license, the same as Cake itself. I meant the Cookbook content. Keep in mind, my proposal rids the Cake team of having to do any development work on the wiki application itself. As of this point, they seem to be spending time on the wiki application. I'm not trying to add to their work, but rather lighten the load and address multiple concerns. If you think it is audacious and brash to put forth such a proposal, then... oh well, it was still worth trying. I still appreciate the CakePHP team and all the work they do. Keep up the good work. Take care, Aaron --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trying to update record, not insert!
Shouldn't it be...
$this-User-id = $data['User']['id'];
?
On May 13, 10:27 am, theandystratton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To preface, I've seen this a few places before but the solutions given
aren't getting me anywhere.
I've got a basic User model extending AppModel, I'm finding a record
based on the matching the data in 2 fields, changing 1 field in the
returned array and trying to save (update) that record by sending the
array back to the save method...
// start code:
$data = $this-User-find( array('User.username' = $username,
'User.email' = $email) );
$data['User']['passwd'] = $this-Auth-password('test');
//
// problem occurs with or without following line:
// $this-User-user_id = $data['User']['user_id'];
//
$this-User-save( $data );
// end of code.
This results in an attempt to insert a new record with the user_id in
$data.
Any help is appreciated, I've migrated into Cake this week and am
trying to convert an existing procedural app to it.
-andy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Cookbook overhaul proposal
I propose that the Cake team use MediaWiki with the FlaggedRevs extension (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs) instead of their homegrown wiki, which currently has a closed review process. This extension, which will be integrated into Wikipedia in the coming months, allows for people to edit the draft of a page, and for users with a special privilege of reviewer to tweak and approve and even rate the proposed changes. This would effectively carry over the functionality of the homemade wiki that book.cakephp.org now uses. Some advantages would include: - Outsiders could see not only the default last-reviewed page, but also see the proposed changes. The process would be more open. - People could engage in MediaWik-style discussions that are attached to a page. - Instead of a progressive chapter breakdown of the content, I would hope that the Cake team would allow for larger pages to split into specific topical pages. I also propose using a more comprehensive front page for the wiki, which would have a handy taxonomy of links to those simply using the wiki as a reference guide. This would be much more intuitive than the current menu on the Cookbook. - The efSyntaxHighlight_GeSHiSetup MediaWiki extension could be used to prettify code. - The CakePHP team wouldn't have to bother maintaining/improving their home-made wiki application. MediaWiki is a great wiki project that continues to grow and be improved. Wikipedia uses it, so it's not likely at all that the application development would go inactive. - MediaWiki's template can be customized to the liking of the CakePHP team. I also propose that the Cookbook be put under a Creative Commons license, but I hear that this is already forthcoming. Thoughts? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1.2 Documentation has made amazing progress
I might disagree on the way the book is structured, but I'd have to agree that it has come a long way. I use it a lot now. Good job, guys. On May 8, 10:33 am, keymaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it's time to change the initial knee-jerk reaction when speaking about cake's documentation. If I remember correctly, only 3-4 months ago there was something like 190 pages. Most of the new 1.2 features were either totally undocumented, or sparse at best. I just had a look today using a pdf created version of the 1.2 cookbook. It currently weighs in at over 330 pages! We clearly have to recognize that the progress on these 1.2 docs over the last couple of months, has been nothing short of amazing. The 1.2 documentation is now, literally, light years better than it was just a few months ago. A couple of more months at this pace, with community members continuing to use the doc, post suggestions, amendments, fleshing out the stuff not yet documented, etc. and I believe we will have totally obliterated any lingering perception of the documentation being an issue. Much appreciation to John Anderson, AD7-Six et al., for the great work. Let's all pitch in and submit something to the cookbook to help them. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1.2 Documentation has made amazing progress
It's been sporadically unresponsive today. Perhaps they're not caching? On May 8, 11:04 am, Sliv (Tim MacAleese) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, indeed, I use it a lot too - maybe at some point there will be a way to mirror it to contributed servers so it doesn't get too slow due to the size and number of people using it :P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ARGHH - why is geneateList deprecated
Whoaa Chill out dude. At the end of the day, these guys have built a great framework and they're volunteering their time to help on groups like this. Try out the IRC channel sometime, perhaps you'd feel more comfortable there. On May 7, 4:52 pm, MikeK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the response, especially yours Nate. It's not a simple find and replace as the syntax of the additional calls must be massaged for each one and is different for various forms and models. Yes my editor has search and replace and your tone SUCKS. It says I should consider myself LUCKY such a BRILLIANT mind as yours deigns to provide such wonderfule FUNCTIONALITY. Where is the documentation on the new and 'beautiful' find(list) ? It's not in the API and it appears the old manual has been gutted. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is the documentation at book.cakephp.org open source?
The answer seems to be because some people believe that a wiki is the solution to all of mankind's problems. You are correct. :-) I think wikis best harness the power of collective intelligence and collaboration for projects like documentation. Also, it it makes sense that CakePHP documentation be under the same license at CakePHP itself. Not trying to ruffle feathers or thumb my nose at anyone. I want to see CakePHP succeed. On May 6, 8:56 am, mbavio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This forking wiki has nothing to do with the attemp to fork CakePHP, or has it? Seems like we are under attack! On May 6, 11:50 am, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 6, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Marcin Domanski wrote: Hey The content is owned by the Cake Software Foundation (...) Can you elaborate why is that ? Why not use GPL ? GFDL ? Creative Commons ? For me it's wierd that a community contributed documentation cannot be used by the community without an approval. Mostly because we don't want 17 different copies of the content out on the web in different forms. Why don't you want that ? wikipedia is freely available and i don't see the problem where articles are available on other sites as long as people know its from wikipedia. There's also *one* wikipedia. How many side wikipedia efforts are flourishing? People know that the official docs are at cakephp.org. I disagree. Besides, even if your assertion was true, what's the point in creating parallel efforts? If everyone knows where to get it from the source, why would they visit other efforts? We've battled this problem before, especially with CakePHP sites in other languages. People *don't* know, especially when they're introduced to us through a non-official channel. but the content in the manual is meant to be reviewed and contributed to in an official setting. Yes but that doesn't really mean that the content couldn't be under GPL or whatever. I think it does. What's the point of having a license like that when we only want the content coming from one place? What did you want to use it for? i didnt want to use it, but lets say - an in-house company cake course. Feel free to reference or quote from it inside your course materials, just like you would any other material. My point is: It's weird that a community contributed documentation cannot be used by the community without an approval. I'm love you guys and i'm ok with the cookbook, i just think its not fair that community contributed docs aren't under an open license http://www.free-culture.cc/ I think the need to eliminate confusion is greater than the need for open content. I still haven't even heard of a decent use case for wanting to re-publish it. And if we did, I'd imagine we'd grant permission. -- John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is the documentation at book.cakephp.org open source?
Well, the book does harness collective intelligence and collaboration, but I personally think wikis do that best. In summary, I like the flexibility of interlinking (I think that's what it's called), of evolving large pages into smaller chunks, of categorizing pages, of discussion areas attached to each page. I think an online book serves somewhat a different purpose and has a different structure than a wiki. A wiki's table of contents, for one, are going to be more topical than progressive like a book's ToC. I personally find book.cakephp.org's table of contents disorienting. Maybe I'm just dense. I probably don't have a solid philosophical presentation for my preference of a wiki. It's really just that, a preference. On May 6, 11:44 am, AD7six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 6, 7:38 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The answer seems to be because some people believe that a wiki is the solution to all of mankind's problems. You are correct. :-) I think wikis best harness the power of collective intelligence and collaboration for projects like documentation. In what way (pending enhancements aside) does the book not harness the power of collective intelligence and collaboration. AD --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is the documentation at book.cakephp.org open source?
My meager, scanty effort has begun here: http://www.cakedocs.org/ On May 6, 12:20 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, the book does harness collective intelligence and collaboration, but I personally think wikis do that best. In summary, I like the flexibility of interlinking (I think that's what it's called), of evolving large pages into smaller chunks, of categorizing pages, of discussion areas attached to each page. I think an online book serves somewhat a different purpose and has a different structure than a wiki. A wiki's table of contents, for one, are going to be more topical than progressive like a book's ToC. I personally find book.cakephp.org's table of contents disorienting. Maybe I'm just dense. I probably don't have a solid philosophical presentation for my preference of a wiki. It's really just that, a preference. On May 6, 11:44 am, AD7six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 6, 7:38 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The answer seems to be because some people believe that a wiki is the solution to all of mankind's problems. You are correct. :-) I think wikis best harness the power of collective intelligence and collaboration for projects like documentation. In what way (pending enhancements aside) does the book not harness the power of collective intelligence and collaboration. AD --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is the documentation at book.cakephp.org open source?
The URL is now: http://www.unauthorizedcakeguide.com/ On May 6, 11:16 pm, Dr. Tarique Sani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My meager, scanty effort has begun here: http://www.cakedocs.org/ Sigh! what a waste I may have differences of opinion on some of the ideas of core devs on some semantics of *freedom* as applied to Open Source. I also agree that forking can be a way of healthy competition but it is a last resort. If people have problems with cookbook lets hear them and lets see some code contributions - gwoo has promised Amit to open the code soon so that the patches can be submitted and I am looking forward to it This and that something on top project I feel is a waste of efforts but again it is those contributor's efforts and it is for them to find ways to utilize it... Just my 2ps (thats USD0.000484) Tarique P.S. Amit sits next to me and I can peek into his mail ;) -- = Cheesecake-Photoblog:http://cheesecake-photoblog.org PHP for E-Biz:http://sanisoft.com = --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Is the documentation at book.cakephp.org open source?
Is the documentation at book.cakephp.org open source? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is the documentation at book.cakephp.org open source?
I'd like to put the content in an open wiki (using MediaWiki). Yeah, I've heard the objections (but why don't you...). I'm aware of what I can already do for book.cakephp.org, and I'm aware of the pro's and con's of an open wiki. On May 5, 8:06 pm, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the documentation at book.cakephp.org open source? Why do you ask? -- Chris Hartjes Internet Loudmouth Motto for 2008: Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes... @TheKeyBoard:http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is the documentation at book.cakephp.org open source?
Thanks for the clarification. I'll just start from scratch. On May 5, 8:56 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The book is open. Anyone is free to contribute. The content is owned by the Cake Software Foundation and contributed by loyal members of the CakePHP community who value collaboration and central location for information and resources related to the CakePHP project. Therefore, you cannot reproduce, distribute, or prepare derivative works based on its content for any purpose, without the permission of the Cake Software Foundation. Bake on. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Twitter Component
I'm having the same problem as mmayes: Notice (1024): XML cannot be read [CORE\cake\libs\xml.php, line 748] This happens after a status_update (which seems successful). On Apr 16, 11:33 am, strangy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I wrote thetwittercomponent and I tested most of the functions and they worked in my tests. During development I had problems with authentication because in the __getAuthHeader function I've used method = 'basic' instead of method = 'Basic'. After I fixed that authentication worked. Today I found one bug in the user_show function. The url had one space at the beginning. You can fetch the code by cloning the git repository. The repository url is git://gitorious.org/cakephp-twitter-cpomponent/mainline.git I've never got the error you are reporting. Can you provide some more info about the error. Maybe you are missing something. You can see how I use the component in the code of my new blog that will replace my rails one that is online now. The code is also on gitorious and you can clone it form git://gitorious.org/munitic-com-hr/mainline.git P.S. You will not be able to run the blog app because there are some files missing like database.php that I didn't include for obvious reasons :) Enjoy! On Apr 16, 6:48 pm, mmayes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I've been trying to get theTwittercomponent working under Cake 1.2 beta. Whenever I attempt a request that requires authentication, I get the error: Notice (1024): XML cannot be read [CORE/cake/libs/xml.php, line 748] My username and password are set correctly, and when I access the xml page and enter them into the HTTP challenge, it works. But I cannot get the component to work other than with methods that do not require authentication. Anybody have any tips? The component I'm referring to it here:http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/twitter-component Cheers, Matt --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Twitter Component
Specifically, I'm having the same problem as Matt when I use status_update to send a direct message. direct_messages_new just simply isn't working. On Apr 16, 10:48 am, mmayes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I've been trying to get theTwittercomponent working under Cake 1.2 beta. Whenever I attempt a request that requires authentication, I get the error: Notice (1024): XML cannot be read [CORE/cake/libs/xml.php, line 748] My username and password are set correctly, and when I access the xml page and enter them into the HTTP challenge, it works. But I cannot get the component to work other than with methods that do not require authentication. Anybody have any tips? The component I'm referring to it here:http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/twitter-component Cheers, Matt --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: .po files not being read suddenly
For some reason my app will read and use for translation:
locale/eng/eng.po
but not
locale/eng/LC_MESSAGES/default.po
Any ideas?
On Mar 26, 8:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Solved! When I added the Auth stuff yesterday, I included some
settings in AppController::beforeFilter(), including:
$this-Auth-loginError = __('Invalid e-mail / password combination.
Please try again', true);
Once I commented that out everything worked as before. So this call to
translate() was somehow messing things up royally.
And, it seems obvious to me now that setting this is unnecessary
because I can place it in the login() method's flash msg.
On Mar 26, 9:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stranger and stranger. I decided to disable Auth because it was that
that I'd added to the site before i18n stopped working. As soon as I
did that, my Configure::read('Config.language') now shows the new
languagesetting. Why would Auth be screwing around with
Config.language?
Unfortunately, I'm still not seeing anything translated ;-(
I'm using cake_1.2.x.x_24.01.2008, btw.
As an aside, does anyone know how to globally disable Auth without
removing it from the $components array in AppController? Doing that
isn't great because I then had to comment out all of the Auth-
allow(...) calls in 5 other controllers.
On Mar 26, 9:37 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think I've narrowed down the problem if not the solution. Looking
through i18n.php I noticed that the getInstance() method checks the
session, but only if thelanguageis not found in the core config.
function getInstance() {
static $instance = array();
if (!$instance) {
$instance[0] = new I18n();
$instance[0]-l10n = new L10n();
$language= Configure::read('Config.language');
if ($language=== null
!empty($_SESSION['Config']['language'])) {
$language= $_SESSION['Config']['language'];
}
$instance[0]-l10n-get($language);
}
return $instance[0];
}
Since I'm doinglanguageswitching this seems backwards to me. If it's
been switched, the newlanguagewould never be picked up here, it
seems. Anyway, I stuck debug(i18n: ${language}); in there but
$languageis consistently empty.
Trying my initial hunch, I modified the method to have:
if (!empty($_SESSION['Config']['language']))
{
$language= $_SESSION['Config']['language'];}
else
{
$language= Configure::read('Config.language');
}
This seems more reasonable to me because mylanguageswitching code (a
modified version of Jason Chow's P28NComponent) is writing the newly-
requested lang to the session.
But the debug() is still showing it's empty, however. So, I put
debug($_SESSION) in my default.ctp and it properly shows the new
language, eg:
Array
(
[Config] = Array
(
[userAgent] = 67d3fbdba7bd59adfe49aefd8b4eb32b
[time] = 1206579533
[rand] = 563719418
[timeout] = 9
[language] = fr
)
)
When I print the output from Configure::read('Config.language') on the
page I see en-us. This doesn't change even when I modify the
component to add a Configure::write('Config.language', $lang);
Does anyone have any thoughts on why the session appears to be empty
in the i18n class? And, if this is normal, why getInstance() would
bother checking it?
On Mar 26, 12:59 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I got some L10n stuff working yesterday but it now seems to have
stopped. I'd extracted a new default.pot file because I had a lot more
strings to translate. I had the script overwrite the one I made
yesterday and copied it into:
locale/eng/LC_MESSAGES/default.po
locale/fre/LC_MESSAGES/default.po
locale/spa/LC_MESSAGES/default.po
Later on, I noticed that I wasn't seeing any changes when switching
languages. $session-read('Config.language') does show the change from
onelanguageto another. And I can immediately see changes to a msgstr
in the eng default.po, so I know that one's being read.
I have caching disabled and I've made no other changes to core.
Neither have I done anything to thelanguagesettings I had.
Any idea what I may have done (or left out) to cause this?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of...
I lately am getting this: Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 16777216 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 2873212 bytes) in C:\Users\Aaron\workspace\cake\libs\cache \file.php on line 138 Is this a bug in Cake? I haven't been getting this before. Any ideas on how to prevent it? I would hope that I wouldn't have to keep upping the memory? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is JQuery replacing Prototype in cake?
Both jQuery and Prototype are wonderful frameworks. I'd hope arrangements would be made for developers who use either. On Feb 17, 1:52 pm, MattC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To make sure I wasn't misrepresenting what was said I re-listened to the podcast. I'm not sure who is talking (Mariano says it's Nate in one of the comments above), but it's at about the 30:35 mark. -Mattwww.pseudocoder.com On Feb 17, 2:08 pm, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 17, 2008 2:07 PM, MattC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's my blog...I heard it on the CakeFest wrapup podcast (http:// live.cakephp.org/shows/view/7). -Matt www.pseudocoder.com Hrm...I listened to that same podcast, but obviously not close enough. Shame on me for daring to work at the same time I was listening to the podcast. Matt, thanks for clearing that up. -- Chris Hartjes Internet Loudmouth Motto for 2008: Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes... @TheKeyBoard:http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Does the Cake schema tool allow one to define the type of a table (innodb, etc)?
Does the Cake schema tool allow one to define the type of a table (innodb, etc)? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: UUID as primary key
I've read In fact if you store UUID in binary form you can bring it down to 16 bytes so size is not really the problem. http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/03/13/to-uuid-or-not-to-uuid/ Why must it be char and not binary? On Feb 13, 8:12 am, Baz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, what's your question? On Feb 12, 2008 4:41 PM, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On this page (http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/uuid-behavior) I saw the following: Last cake 1.2 build support uuid for your primary key column. You just need have field ID with type varchar(36) Does anyone have any more information on this? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
UUID as primary key
On this page (http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/uuid-behavior) I saw the following: Last cake 1.2 build support uuid for your primary key column. You just need have field ID with type varchar(36) Does anyone have any more information on this? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How does one use $this-render in plugins in the latest SVN build?
I'm getting Missing View and it's looking for the view file in the main app. This wasn't so about a week ago. Any ideas? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Latest additions to 1.2
I went back to trying loadModel and it's weird, on two different
machines I have the same SVN updates of cake and my app. I've triple-
checked this.
But on one machine I get:
Warning (512): loadModel is deprecated see App::import('Model',
'ModelName'); [CORE\cake\basics.php, line 1036]
And on the other machine it works fine.
On Dec 7, 10:24 am, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using latest SVN I get:
Fatal error: Call to undefined method ClassRegistry::init()
On Dec 7, 6:00 am, francky06l [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClassRegistry::init('plugin.modelname'); should work.
On Dec 6, 10:49 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahhh specifically it works when you manually do animport, but you
can't yet use dot notation with uses at the top of your controller.
On Nov 17, 9:17 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several people voiced opinions about plugins and in an effort to make
them more flexible we added the functionality to access models across
plugins and the main application in the current 1.2 branch. Use the
dot notation Plugin.Model to access models in thepluginand Model
to access the models of the main app.
To allow us this flexibility we changed how classes are loaded and
instances created. From the initial tests, these changes provide some
nice performance gains while reducing the amount of code needed in
your application. Keep in mind that with greater flexibility, comes
greater responsibility to maintain your applications architecture.
ClassRegistry::init(); will return an instance of the class from the
registry or create and add it to the registry if it does not exist.
This is particularly useful for models and is used in the current core
code to create the model instances.
App::import(); will load and cache the location of a file found
anywhere in the cake install. This is used in place of the load*
functions previously found in basics.php. You can see in the current
code that the functions use this class method now.
The api for these methods are currently in alpha state, but will be
stabilized for beta. You can check out the doc comments for more info.
The online API,http://api.cakephp.orgwillbeupdatedshortly.
Bake on.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Latest additions to 1.2
I figured everything out. I'm an idiot :-)
On Dec 7, 10:24 am, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using latest SVN I get:
Fatal error: Call to undefined method ClassRegistry::init()
On Dec 7, 6:00 am, francky06l [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClassRegistry::init('plugin.modelname'); should work.
On Dec 6, 10:49 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahhh specifically it works when you manually do animport, but you
can't yet use dot notation with uses at the top of your controller.
On Nov 17, 9:17 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several people voiced opinions about plugins and in an effort to make
them more flexible we added the functionality to access models across
plugins and the main application in the current 1.2 branch. Use the
dot notation Plugin.Model to access models in thepluginand Model
to access the models of the main app.
To allow us this flexibility we changed how classes are loaded and
instances created. From the initial tests, these changes provide some
nice performance gains while reducing the amount of code needed in
your application. Keep in mind that with greater flexibility, comes
greater responsibility to maintain your applications architecture.
ClassRegistry::init(); will return an instance of the class from the
registry or create and add it to the registry if it does not exist.
This is particularly useful for models and is used in the current core
code to create the model instances.
App::import(); will load and cache the location of a file found
anywhere in the cake install. This is used in place of the load*
functions previously found in basics.php. You can see in the current
code that the functions use this class method now.
The api for these methods are currently in alpha state, but will be
stabilized for beta. You can check out the doc comments for more info.
The online API,http://api.cakephp.orgwillbeupdatedshortly.
Bake on.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Latest additions to 1.2
Using latest SVN I get:
Fatal error: Call to undefined method ClassRegistry::init()
On Dec 7, 6:00 am, francky06l [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClassRegistry::init('plugin.modelname'); should work.
On Dec 6, 10:49 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahhh specifically it works when you manually do animport, but you
can't yet use dot notation with uses at the top of your controller.
On Nov 17, 9:17 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several people voiced opinions about plugins and in an effort to make
them more flexible we added the functionality to access models across
plugins and the main application in the current 1.2 branch. Use the
dot notation Plugin.Model to access models in thepluginand Model
to access the models of the main app.
To allow us this flexibility we changed how classes are loaded and
instances created. From the initial tests, these changes provide some
nice performance gains while reducing the amount of code needed in
your application. Keep in mind that with greater flexibility, comes
greater responsibility to maintain your applications architecture.
ClassRegistry::init(); will return an instance of the class from the
registry or create and add it to the registry if it does not exist.
This is particularly useful for models and is used in the current core
code to create the model instances.
App::import(); will load and cache the location of a file found
anywhere in the cake install. This is used in place of the load*
functions previously found in basics.php. You can see in the current
code that the functions use this class method now.
The api for these methods are currently in alpha state, but will be
stabilized for beta. You can check out the doc comments for more info.
The online API,http://api.cakephp.orgwillbeupdated shortly.
Bake on.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Latest additions to 1.2
Unfortunately, in the latest SVN revision it dot notation doesn't seem to be working. And the error page is telling me to create a class name with a dot in it. On Nov 17, 9:17 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Several people voiced opinions about plugins and in an effort to make them more flexible we added the functionality to access models across plugins and the main application in the current 1.2 branch. Use the dot notation Plugin.Model to access models in thepluginand Model to access the models of the main app. To allow us this flexibility we changed how classes are loaded and instances created. From the initial tests, these changes provide some nice performance gains while reducing the amount of code needed in your application. Keep in mind that with greater flexibility, comes greater responsibility to maintain your applications architecture. ClassRegistry::init(); will return an instance of the class from the registry or create and add it to the registry if it does not exist. This is particularly useful for models and is used in the current core code to create the model instances. App::import(); will load and cache the location of a file found anywhere in the cake install. This is used in place of the load* functions previously found in basics.php. You can see in the current code that the functions use this class method now. The api for these methods are currently in alpha state, but will be stabilized for beta. You can check out the doc comments for more info. The online API,http://api.cakephp.orgwill be updated shortly. Bake on. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Latest additions to 1.2
Ahhh specifically it works when you manually do an import, but you can't yet use dot notation with uses at the top of your controller. On Nov 17, 9:17 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Several people voiced opinions about plugins and in an effort to make them more flexible we added the functionality to access models across plugins and the main application in the current 1.2 branch. Use the dot notation Plugin.Model to access models in thepluginand Model to access the models of the main app. To allow us this flexibility we changed how classes are loaded and instances created. From the initial tests, these changes provide some nice performance gains while reducing the amount of code needed in your application. Keep in mind that with greater flexibility, comes greater responsibility to maintain your applications architecture. ClassRegistry::init(); will return an instance of the class from the registry or create and add it to the registry if it does not exist. This is particularly useful for models and is used in the current core code to create the model instances. App::import(); will load and cache the location of a file found anywhere in the cake install. This is used in place of the load* functions previously found in basics.php. You can see in the current code that the functions use this class method now. The api for these methods are currently in alpha state, but will be stabilized for beta. You can check out the doc comments for more info. The online API,http://api.cakephp.orgwill be updated shortly. Bake on. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Latest additions to 1.2
Excellent!!! On Nov 17, 9:17 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Several people voiced opinions aboutpluginsand in an effort to make them more flexible we added the functionality to access models acrosspluginsand the main application in the current 1.2 branch. Use the dot notation Plugin.Model to access models in the plugin and Model to access the models of the main app. To allow us this flexibility we changed how classes are loaded and instances created. From the initial tests, these changes provide some nice performance gains while reducing the amount of code needed in your application. Keep in mind that with greater flexibility, comes greater responsibility to maintain your applications architecture. ClassRegistry::init(); will return an instance of the class from the registry or create and add it to the registry if it does not exist. This is particularly useful for models and is used in the current core code to create the model instances. App::import(); will load and cache the location of a file found anywhere in the cake install. This is used in place of the load* functions previously found in basics.php. You can see in the current code that the functions use this class method now. The api for these methods are currently in alpha state, but will be stabilized for beta. You can check out the doc comments for more info. The online API,http://api.cakephp.orgwill be updated shortly. Bake on. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1.2 Routing question..
Router::connectNamed(array('project_name'));
Router::connect('/project/:project_name/*');
That's a start
On Nov 30, 1:27 pm, chad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could I achieve routing like so: /project/{project_name}/{action}/
* without any hacks in the controller? I have it working with some
hacks in the controller but would rather make it more dynamic in the
future and figured Router might help with that.
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using models with plugins in CakePHP 1.2
I'd have to agree with some folks here---it'd be great if plugins could plugin into the existing application and have access to the main app's models, etc. Perhaps plugins could be split into two types? One of the reasons Wordpress is so popular is its plugin system (which tap into the larger app). It'd be nice if CakePHP made it easy for us to set up our apps this way. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
get/put/delete/post HTTP requests in CakePHP 1.2
I saw the following at
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2007/01/24/whats-new-in-prototype-15.html
---
The standard XMLHttpRequest object at the heart of Ajax functionality
only allows HTTP GET and POST methods, but RESTfully-designed web
applications often call for the lesser-used methods, like PUT and
DELETE. Until browsers support the full range of HTTP methods,
Prototype offers a compromise: tunneling those methods over POST, by
including a _method query parameter with the request. You can now
specify the intended HTTP method with the method option on all Ajax
functions (the default is POST). Methods other than GET or POST will
actually be requested with POST, but will have a _method query
parameter appended to the request URL. For example:
// Creates a POST request to /feeds/1.rss?_method=PUT
new Ajax.Request('/feeds/1.rss', { method:'put', postBody:myXML,
contentType:'application/rss+xml' });
Of course, the server side of the application must be written to
understand this convention as well, but if you use Rails, you'll get
the behavior for free.
---
Then I saw this at http://prototypejs.org/api/ajax/options
As a Ruby On Rails special, Prototype also reacts to other verbs (such
as 'put' and 'delete' by actually using 'post' and putting an extra
'_method' parameter with the originally requested method in there.
---
I was wondering if, like Rails, CakePHP had this feature?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: get/put/delete/post HTTP requests in CakePHP 1.2
I just found this in dispatcher.php:
if (isset($params['form']['_method'])) {
if (isset($_SERVER) !empty($_SERVER)) {
$_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] =
$params['form']['_method'];
} else {
$_ENV['REQUEST_METHOD'] =
$params['form']['_method'];
}
unset($params['form']['_method']);
}
On Nov 11, 4:37 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw the following
athttp://www.xml.com/pub/a/2007/01/24/whats-new-in-prototype-15.html
---
The standard XMLHttpRequest object at the heart of Ajax functionality
only allows HTTP GET and POST methods, but RESTfully-designed web
applications often call for the lesser-used methods, like PUT and
DELETE. Until browsers support the full range of HTTP methods,
Prototype offers a compromise: tunneling those methods over POST, by
including a _method query parameter with the request. You can now
specify the intended HTTP method with the method option on all Ajax
functions (the default is POST). Methods other than GET or POST will
actually be requested with POST, but will have a _method query
parameter appended to the request URL. For example:
// Creates a POST request to /feeds/1.rss?_method=PUT
new Ajax.Request('/feeds/1.rss', { method:'put', postBody:myXML,
contentType:'application/rss+xml' });
Of course, the server side of the application must be written to
understand this convention as well, but if you use Rails, you'll get
the behavior for free.
---
Then I saw this athttp://prototypejs.org/api/ajax/options
As a Ruby On Rails special, Prototype also reacts to other verbs (such
as 'put' and 'delete' by actually using 'post' and putting an extra
'_method' parameter with the originally requested method in there.
---
I was wondering if, like Rails, CakePHP had this feature?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using models with plugins in CakePHP 1.2
Thanks, but what if it's part of the main app? That's my particular
problem.
On Nov 7, 11:59 pm, rtconner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you have to do..
$uses = array('Pluginname.Modelname');
On Nov 7, 10:54 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a plugin which has two models of its own. I've followed the
directions to creating a plugin to the T.
In the plugin's own app_controller file I have the following:
class PluginNameAppController extends AppController ...
This creates a problem. The main AppController file uses some
models, like User. But I get a missing model error because it attempts
to load models used by AppController in the plugin's models
subdirectory. The User model is in the main models directory, though.
Any thoughts? Is this just a deficiency of CakePHP 1.2 I'll have to
live with? Why can't I use models in the main app models directory?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using models with plugins in CakePHP 1.2
I guess it makes sense for me that plugins could inherit models. Plugins plug into the existing applications, i.e. have connection to beyond the simple routing. On Nov 8, 11:21 am, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Plugins should not access models from application. If you think about plugin for a second you can understand why. There are other ways to organize your models, see /app/config/bootstrap.php --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Using models with plugins in CakePHP 1.2
I have a plugin which has two models of its own. I've followed the directions to creating a plugin to the T. In the plugin's own app_controller file I have the following: class PluginNameAppController extends AppController ... This creates a problem. The main AppController file uses some models, like User. But I get a missing model error because it attempts to load models used by AppController in the plugin's models subdirectory. The User model is in the main models directory, though. Any thoughts? Is this just a deficiency of CakePHP 1.2 I'll have to live with? Why can't I use models in the main app models directory? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Stable vs Development
Same here. On Oct 16, 11:23 am, Wayne Fay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using 1.2 on a production server with no issues to speak of. Wayne On 10/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey guy, I got a question for those of you using version 1.2 alpha. So far i have based my applications on previous stable versions of cake, and now i was looking into trying into starting a new application based on 1.2, because it has quite a few interesting new features. The thing that wories me is that it being still an alpha version, bugs might appear along the way. This application would be on a production server and it might not be the best thing to have uncontrolled bugs appear. So .. any oppitions and advice? Thx --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: CakePHP Live Broadcast: Be There Or Be Square
I agree. This is great! On Sep 19, 7:18 am, tracyfloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Awesome! I was thinking just the other day how great a CakePHP podcast would be... heading over to subscribe now! On Sep 19, 1:51 am, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 18, 2007, at 8:51 PM, rtconner wrote: Can I be there AND be a square? No. By being there, you are (by defintion) cool. -- John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I can no longer directly access the index method?
You are seeing this error because the private class method index should not be accessed directly. Apparently this is part of the latest SVN update of 1.2. Ideas? Thoughts? Explanation? Thanks, Aaron --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: New Router usage as of 5535 $Route-connectNamed()
Wow... connectNamed... huge help! Didn't know about this!
On Sep 10, 4:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Originally I thought this was an optional new feature, but for those
who were passing arrays with arbitrary named values to Router::url()
and its friends HtmlHelper::url() and HtmlHelper::link(), note that
the parameter must be defined with a $Route-connectNamed() in
routes.php or the router won't know how to create the URL. Thanks
biesbjerg!
On Sep 10, 5:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I was not aware of the new explicit nature.
On Sep 10, 5:15 pm, biesbjerg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Correct way to implement above route would be:
Router::connectNamed(array('community_id'));
Router::connect('/:community_id/bulletins/:action/*',
array('controller' = 'bulletins'), array('community_id' =
'[0-9]+'));
On Sep 10, 10:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been working all morning on this without any luck. This is on
Cake 1.2 (branch) / 5626. The only nonstandard thing I'm doing is app
and webroot dirs outside the normal locations (and renamed), but that
shouldn't make a difference with this.
ROUTE
$Route-connect('/:community_id/bulletins/:action/*',
array('controller' = 'bulletins'));
CONTROLLER/VIEW
echo $html-url(array('community_id'=203, 'controller'='bulletins',
'action'='view', 'bulletin_id'=23423));
EXPECTED URL:
/203/bulletins/view/bulletin_id:23423
RETURNED URL:
/bulletins/view
MODIFICATION (bulletin_id param removed)
echo $html-url(array('community_id'=203, 'controller'='bulletins',
'action'='view'));
RETURNED URL:
/203/bulletins/view
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Preventing 1.2's form helper from rendering a fieldset with radio buttons
I'm using the latest SVN update of 1.2 Why all the sudden are all my radio buttons surrounded by fieldsets? Can I disable this part? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with the translate function __()
Would that mean I'd have to use the .po language files in an unusual
way... putting ALL of my language data into one file? That'd be a
drag!
On Aug 18, 2:08 am, jitka (poLK) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not cake issue, it is Zend problem with debug_backtrace() used
so deep.
Try
echo $form-input('username',array('label' =
__d('users', 'Username',true)));
'users' means that this translation should be searched in users.mo/po,
so if you have one file with all translations named default.po/mo,
replace 'users' with 'default' and you should be fine.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Trouble with the translate function __()
I'm using the latest svn update of CakePHP freakin awesome 1.2.
This works:
$temp = __(Username,true);
echo $form-input('username',array('label' = $temp));
This doesn't, and I get an internal server error
echo $form-input('username',array('label' =
__(Username,true)));
Why would this be any different?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Regular expression in Router::connect
By the way, I need it to exclude multiple strings. So something to the
effect of:
Router::connect('/:group/:curriculum/*',
array('controller'='curriculum'),array('curriculum'='!xyz AND !abc
AND !mno'));
On May 14, 3:38 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Router::connect I'd like to use a regular expression that would
say the curriculum cannot be
xyz' . Shouldn't this work?
Router::connect('/:group/:curriculum/*',
array('controller'='curriculum'),array('curriculum'='!xyz'));
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Regular expression in Router::connect
Wooo hoo!
I figured it out:
Router::connect('/:group/:curriculum/*',
array('controller'='curriculum'),array('curriculum'='\b(?:(?!
curriculum|courses|facilitators|configuration)\w)+\b'));
Thanks to:
http://www.roscripts.com/PHP_regular_expressions_examples-136.html
On May 14, 3:38 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Router::connect I'd like to use a regular expression that would
say the curriculum cannot be
xyz' . Shouldn't this work?
Router::connect('/:group/:curriculum/*',
array('controller'='curriculum'),array('curriculum'='!xyz'));
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Trouble with the Router
The following seems to force whatever action I'm currently using into
the url returned by Router::url.
Router::connect('/:group/:controller/:action/*',
array('action'=null), array('controller' = 'curriculum|courses|
facilitators|configuration'));
I thought array('action'=null) would make the action optional?
If I change it to:
Router::connect('/:group/:controller/:action/*',
array('action'='index'), array('controller' = 'curriculum|courses|
facilitators|configuration'));
... it, as expected, defaults the action to 'index'. But here's the
thing: I'd only like the action to be visible in the url when it's
*not* 'index'. Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with the Router
I extensively use Router::url in my application. I'd hope I could use
some sort of regular expression or option in the usage of Router::url
without afterwards modifying what Router::url returns.
$5 to anyone who can help me with this problem :-)
On May 13, 8:04 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following seems to force whatever action I'm currently using into
the url returned by Router::url.
Router::connect('/:group/:controller/:action/*',
array('action'=null), array('controller' = 'curriculum|courses|
facilitators|configuration'));
I thought array('action'=null) would make the action optional?
If I change it to:
Router::connect('/:group/:controller/:action/*',
array('action'='index'), array('controller' = 'curriculum|courses|
facilitators|configuration'));
... it, as expected, defaults the action to 'index'. But here's the
thing: I'd only like the action to be visible in the url when it's
*not* 'index'. Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with the Router
Here are some relevant CakeBin pastes:
http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1593972132
http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1098672765
When I uncomment the pr($url), I get this:
http://bin.cakephp.org/view/706088071
On May 13, 8:27 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I extensively use Router::url in my application. I'd hope I could use
some sort of regular expression or option in the usage of Router::url
without afterwards modifying what Router::url returns.
$5 to anyone who can help me with this problem :-)
On May 13, 8:04 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following seems to force whatever action I'm currently using into
the url returned by Router::url.
Router::connect('/:group/:controller/:action/*',
array('action'=null), array('controller' = 'curriculum|courses|
facilitators|configuration'));
I thought array('action'=null) would make the action optional?
If I change it to:
Router::connect('/:group/:controller/:action/*',
array('action'='index'), array('controller' = 'curriculum|courses|
facilitators|configuration'));
... it, as expected, defaults the action to 'index'. But here's the
thing: I'd only like the action to be visible in the url when it's
*not* 'index'. Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with the Router
Here are the routes that got it working: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1621988238 Crucial to it working was me sending an empty string (instead of null) as the action parameter to Router::url Tip of the hat goes to PhpNut for the help. And the money, as he requested, goes to the Cake Software Foundation. On May 13, 8:52 pm, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/13/07, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I extensively use Router::url in my application. I'd hope I could use some sort of regular expression or option in the usage of Router::url without afterwards modifying what Router::url returns. $5 to anyone who can help me with this problem :-) You are trying to alter a fundamental behaviour of pretty much any routing system in a Model-View-Controller based framework. If there are any frameworks that behave exactly the way you need, I'd love to see how they are doing it. The default action for any controller is 'index', unless you configure it otherwise. It's a convention of the system. If you set it to 'null', it's going to fall back to the rules of the system itself, which says 'index' is the action and it will happily return the URL with 'index' or whatever else is the default action in it. When you ask it to give you the URL that represents the default action for a controller, well, it's going to tell you whatever the convention is or whatever you've told it you want it to be. Don't want URL's with 'index' in them? Then you can't ask CakePHP to generate the URL for you. You'll have to do them by hand. If I am wrong, I'm sure others are rubbing their hands in glee at a chance to point out the mistakes of the Grumpy Old Man of the List. -- Chris Hartjes My motto for 2007: Just build it, damnit! @TheBallpark -http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard -http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake 1.1 vs 1.2
If it's a long-term enterprise application, and you're just getting started, my opinion is to start using 1.2. On May 13, 8:35 pm, Oshuma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've recently started a project using Cake 1.1.14.4797 and I'm curious as to the pros/cons in 1.1 and 1.2. How long will 1.1 be maintained and should I just start using 1.2? My app is really small at the moment, so it wouldn't be much trouble to rewrite it for 1.2 (if that's even required). Also, how much of 1.2 is documented? I noticed the API docs has 1.2.x.x, but a lot of it seems incomplete. Does the Manual apply to 1.2 as well? Sorry I'm playing 20 questions here. Heh. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Customizing routes
Yes, I have read the manual, but it doesn't address the
aforementioned.
I'm trying to accomplish this with:
Router::connect('/:group/:curriculum/:controller/:action/*');
But even when I send additional parameters to Router::url it doesn't
work:
Router::url(array('controller'='facilitators','action'='index','group'='local-
university','curriculum'='history-101'));
Any ideas on how to accomplish this sort of thing?
I'm using the latest SVN version of 1.2.
On May 9, 2:11 pm, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/9/07, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have my controllers function normally at /controller/
action, but I'd also like users to be able to access parts of my site
using /groupName/courseName. How would I go about doing this? Any good
suggestions on where to look on how to customize the routes this way?
Does nobody read the manual any more?
http://manual.cakephp.org/chapter/configuration
Go down to section 3 and that should point you in the right direction.
--
Chris Hartjes
My motto for 2007: Just build it, damnit!
@TheBallpark -http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark
@TheKeyboard -http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: CakePHP Another winner
Great job CakePHP devs! Keep up the good work. On May 10, 8:52 am, Mariano Iglesias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or if you don't want to scroll down: http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0#cat_51 -MI --- Remember, smart coders answer ten questions for every question they ask. So be smart, be cool, and share your knowledge. BAKE ON! blog:http://www.MarianoIglesias.com.ar -Mensaje original- De: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Tane Piper Enviado el: Jueves, 10 de Mayo de 2007 11:47 a.m. Para: cake-php@googlegroups.com Asunto: Re: CakePHP Another winner Oh, here is the direct link to the awards: --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Customizing routes
I'd like to have my controllers function normally at /controller/ action, but I'd also like users to be able to access parts of my site using /groupName/courseName. How would I go about doing this? Any good suggestions on where to look on how to customize the routes this way? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How do I use i18n and l10n in CakePHP 1.2?
I figured it out. You can only really run __() in the views.
On May 6, 6:29 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas on this? This hang-up has kept me back for days.
On May 5, 8:34 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have $_SESSION['Config']['language'] set to my desired language
buti18n::translate doesn't even seem to have access to $_SESSION?. I've
done a pr($_SESSION) at line 114 ofi18n.php and it returns blank. If
I do a pr($_SESSION) in a view it works fine. Any ideas?
On May 5, 6:08 am, CraZyLeGs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you probably mean $_SESSION['Config']['language']
On May 4, 2:08 pm, misho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well Yes,
I do some checks on allowed languages, but I don't have a separate
controller to deal with this.
Just scan URL into function (in app_controller.php) and then redirect.
And thank you I do not know that Configure::write('Config.language',
'en') and $_SESSION['Config.language'] are actually the same.
On May 4, 2:35 pm, jitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if You will store selected language in session, route url
'/language/
*' to some controller-action and do
$this-Session-write('Config.language', $arg); in it (probably with
check if this
lng is allowed) - then redirect to referer
- if You will save Config.language in session, You don't have to use
Configure class (session takes precedency)
- /app/locale/LANG/LC_MESSAGES should be /app/locale/LOCALE/
LC_MESSAGES - see L10n::$__l10nMap (locale != language)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How do I use i18n and l10n in CakePHP 1.2?
Any ideas on this? This hang-up has kept me back for days.
On May 5, 8:34 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have $_SESSION['Config']['language'] set to my desired language
buti18n::translate doesn't even seem to have access to $_SESSION?. I've
done a pr($_SESSION) at line 114 ofi18n.php and it returns blank. If
I do a pr($_SESSION) in a view it works fine. Any ideas?
On May 5, 6:08 am, CraZyLeGs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you probably mean $_SESSION['Config']['language']
On May 4, 2:08 pm, misho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well Yes,
I do some checks on allowed languages, but I don't have a separate
controller to deal with this.
Just scan URL into function (in app_controller.php) and then redirect.
And thank you I do not know that Configure::write('Config.language',
'en') and $_SESSION['Config.language'] are actually the same.
On May 4, 2:35 pm, jitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if You will store selected language in session, route url '/language/
*' to some controller-action and do
$this-Session-write('Config.language', $arg); in it (probably with
check if this
lng is allowed) - then redirect to referer
- if You will save Config.language in session, You don't have to use
Configure class (session takes precedency)
- /app/locale/LANG/LC_MESSAGES should be /app/locale/LOCALE/
LC_MESSAGES - see L10n::$__l10nMap (locale != language)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How do I use i18n and l10n in CakePHP 1.2?
I have $_SESSION['Config']['language'] set to my desired language but
i18n::translate doesn't even seem to have access to $_SESSION?. I've
done a pr($_SESSION) at line 114 of i18n.php and it returns blank. If
I do a pr($_SESSION) in a view it works fine. Any ideas?
On May 5, 6:08 am, CraZyLeGs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you probably mean $_SESSION['Config']['language']
On May 4, 2:08 pm, misho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well Yes,
I do some checks on allowed languages, but I don't have a separate
controller to deal with this.
Just scan URL into function (in app_controller.php) and then redirect.
And thank you I do not know that Configure::write('Config.language',
'en') and $_SESSION['Config.language'] are actually the same.
On May 4, 2:35 pm, jitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if You will store selected language in session, route url '/language/
*' to some controller-action and do
$this-Session-write('Config.language', $arg); in it (probably with
check if this
lng is allowed) - then redirect to referer
- if You will save Config.language in session, You don't have to use
Configure class (session takes precedency)
- /app/locale/LANG/LC_MESSAGES should be /app/locale/LOCALE/
LC_MESSAGES - see L10n::$__l10nMap (locale != language)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Adding a field to a template
If you're in a view, try ?php echo $row['ModelName']['columnname'] ? ... instead. Also, you can always do this: ? pr($row); ? That'll give you an idea of what's inside the array. I highly recommend stepping through this tutorial: http://manual.cakephp.org/appendix/blog_tutorial It's a quick way to get your feet wet. It's what I did to become familiar with CakePHP and I was told in 15 minutes after having frustrated myself with the Symfony framework. On May 4, 7:19 am, sfa_ok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I'm very new to cake development but I URGENTLY need to make some amendments to a site because the original developer deserted us :S I just need to add a new field to a template. I added it to the table in the database and Im trying to view it the value using ?php echo $row['tablename']['columnname'] ? but it wont workI must be missing some step. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks in advance --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How does one prevent $form-select from escaping characters in the option titles?
How does one prevent $form-select from escaping characters in the option titles? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Application crashing between beforeFilter and actual filter
My CakePHP 1.2 app is sometimes returning a blank page (or 404 in IE)
between the beforeFilter and before the actual filter itself. I have
confirmed this with die('test'); statements in either. Where could it
be crashing? Is this a CakePHP 1.2 problem?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Application crashing between beforeFilter and actual filter
I figured out. When I take the Security component out, it works. When
I include it, it sends me to a black hole when I send the user login
POST.
On May 3, 10:11 am, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My CakePHP 1.2 app is sometimes returning a blank page (or 404 in IE)
between the beforeFilter and before the actual filter itself. I have
confirmed this with die('test'); statements in either. Where could it
be crashing? Is this a CakePHP 1.2 problem?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How does one override the default or automatically detected language in CakePHP?
How does one override the default or automatically detected language in CakePHP? I'd like to switch between languages that aren't the default of my browser. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Changes to SecurityComponent - every form I submit gets blackholed
I have had this same problem.
On May 3, 9:25 am, Marcus T. Jaschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
in the last days the SecurityComponent was refactored (rev 4972)
After updating to the latest SVN version of CakePHP every Form I submit
(AJAX oder classic POST-Request) gets blackholed by the SecurityComponent.
I've inlcuded the SecurityComponent in the controllers with
var $components = array('Security', 'RequestHandler', ...);
There are no settings in beforeFilter callback like
$this-Security-requirePost('action1', 'action2') or
$this-Security-requireAuth('action1', 'action2'),
I just inlucded SecurityComponent.
Can anyone reproduce this? How can I solve this issue?
Marcus
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Changes to SecurityComponent - every form I submit gets blackholed
... even when using the form helper to create forms.
On May 3, 3:16 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have had this same problem.
On May 3, 9:25 am, Marcus T. Jaschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
in the last days the SecurityComponent was refactored (rev 4972)
After updating to the latest SVN version of CakePHP every Form I submit
(AJAX oder classic POST-Request) gets blackholed by the SecurityComponent.
I've inlcuded the SecurityComponent in the controllers with
var $components = array('Security', 'RequestHandler', ...);
There are no settings in beforeFilter callback like
$this-Security-requirePost('action1', 'action2') or
$this-Security-requireAuth('action1', 'action2'),
I just inlucded SecurityComponent.
Can anyone reproduce this? How can I solve this issue?
Marcus
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How can one detect whether the current language is left-to-right or right-to-left?
How can one, in CakePHP 1.2, detect whether the current language is left-to-right or right-to-left? Do I have to resort to manually putting it into the .po file? Thanks, Aaron --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Can I overload an Auth component method?
To use the new Cake 1.2 Auth component I'd like to overload the isAuthorizied method. This is because I don't or need or want the Auth component to use ACL. How do I go about doing this? Thanks, Aaron --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Automating something with __()
That's just the thing, I'm trying to figure a way to automate that, just like AUTO_OUTPUT automates it elsewhere. On Apr 10, 6:16 am, jitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: set 2nd argument of this function to true --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Automating something with __()
Is there a way to have __() automatically return the value instead of echoing it, such as with AUTO_OUTPUT? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Styling a flash message generated by Auth
In CakePHP 1.2, Auth generates a flash message that is given the ID of Auth.login. In CSS, is there a way to style this by its ID? The period makes it difficult! :-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Pagination in Cake 1.2
I'm trying to get pagination working in Cake 1.2. I have the very
latest (using SVN checkout).
This:
?=$paginator-next('Next ', array('nextPage'=2), null,
array('class' = 'disabled')); ?
... renders as:
a href=/groups/ nextPage=2 id=link7934 onclick= return
false;Next gt;gt;/ascript type=text/
javascriptEvent.observe('link7934', 'click', function(event){ new
Ajax.Updater('content','/groups/', {asynchronous:true,
evalScripts:true, onLoading:function(request)
{Element.show('spinner');}, onComplete:function(request, json)
{Element.hide('spinner');}, requestHeaders:['X-Update',
'content']}) }, false);/script
When I click next, it simply reloads the first page. There doesn't
seem to be anything in this indicating what page is loaded.
This:
?=$paginator-counter(); ?
... works great, and renders as:
Page 1 of 6
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Aaron
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Pagination in Cake 1.2
Grant, thanks for the reply
Some documentation on the paginator is
athttp://blog.insertdesignhere.com/posts/view/16
This was my starting point for learning how to do this. I am
essentially trying to implement the example in that blog post.
1. Have you called $paginator-options() ?
Yes, in my view I have the following:
? $paginator-options(array('update' = 'content','indicator' =
'spinner')); ?
2. Do you have the appropriate content div for the ajax call (which
you are currently using) to update?
Yes, and this is being updated (I verified this). Unfortunately, it's
only updated with the same items of the first page.
Any help is appreciated,
Aaron
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
