Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collab study group on facebook

[CCIEing]

Hi Wayne,

I used ipexpert  Racks during my preparation, does that mean I am a member. If 
the answer is yes, then how to join ?

Thanks  

Sent from my iPhone

On May 28, 2014, at 11:42 PM, Wayne Lawson  wrote:

> Yes - you will be a member. 
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Wayne A. Lawson II
> Founder & CEO - iPexpert
> CCIE #5244 / Emeritus
> :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training
>  
> Mobile: +1.810.334.1564
> :: Free Videos
> :: Free Training / Product Offerings
> :: CCIE Blog
> :: Twitter
> 
> On May 28, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Shinobi CCIE  wrote:
> 
>> Hello Wayne,
>> 
>> I purchased the OWLE for the previous CCIE version unfortunately I did not 
>> pass. Does that make me a member? How do we do to get access to the "Next 
>> Generation"? I am not actively preparing for the lab but I hope to keep 
>> reading and helping the group if possible.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Roger Carpio.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Attila Rumy  wrote:
>> Hi Wayne,
>> 
>> I'm looking forward to the "Next Generation"!
>> 
>> In the meantime, could you please tell me when will the Collaboration 
>> workbooks be released? There was a post on the 14th of May about Andy 
>> writing a blog about the ETA's the next day, but since then there're no news.
>> 
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Attila
>> 
>> 2014.05.25. 22:41 ezt írta ("Wayne Lawson" ):
>> 
>> If you're a customer - if you've EVER bought a product - you're a member!! 
>> 
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Wayne A. Lawson II
>> Founder & CEO - iPexpert
>> CCIE #5244 / Emeritus
>> :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training
>>  
>> Mobile: +1.810.334.1564
>> :: Free Videos
>> :: Free Training / Product Offerings
>> :: CCIE Blog
>> :: Twitter
>> 
>> On May 25, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Daniel Gómez  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello Wayne,
>>> 
>>> Sounds great!
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately I wasn't able to pass my CCIE Voice. I hope to be able to 
>>> join the new community as I'n still preparing for CCIE Collaboration.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Daniel Gømez.
>>> 
>>> Enviado desde mi iPhone
>>> 
>>> El 25/05/2014, a las 14:57, Wayne Lawson  
>>> escribió:
>>> 
 Guys - I want you all to know that as part of our "Next Generation" 
 relaunch - we will be shutting down the OSL lists, and launching a 
 Member's Only Support Community. It will accomplish 2 things;
 
 - First, get you much quicker response from my instructors, support team, 
 training advisors, student coordinators and me. 
 
 - Secondly, spam and trolls will be eliminated. 
 
 You guys are going to absolutely LOVE what we have planned and what we'll 
 be launching when Next Gen goes live - it's less than 2 weeks away!
 
 Regards,
  
 Wayne A. Lawson II
 Founder & CEO - iPexpert
 CCIE #5244 / Emeritus
 :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training
  
 Mobile: +1.810.334.1564
 :: Free Videos
 :: Free Training / Product Offerings
 :: CCIE Blog
 :: Twitter
 
 On May 25, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Chris Avants  wrote:
 
> I thought that sounded so interesting,  just must provide company details 
> and have an email, lol!
> 
> Has to be the same people trying different stuff to pedal their crap.
> 
> On May 25, 2014 3:30 PM, "Wayne Lawson"  
> wrote:
> You're going to be banned from this group for life. This isn't a personal 
> FB marketing avenue for you. 
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Wayne A. Lawson II
> Founder & CEO - iPexpert
> CCIE #5244 / Emeritus
> :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training
>  
> Mobile: +1.810.334.1564
> :: Free Videos
> :: Free Training / Product Offerings
> :: CCIE Blog
> :: Twitter
> 
> On May 25, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Bashar Aziz  wrote:
> 
>> Today I would like to announce publishing a new study group on Facebook, 
>> this group is a closed one, which means that you have to ask a 
>> permission to join and see posts.
>> 
>> It is meant for professionals and experts in CCIE Collaboration field 
>> who preparing for the LAB solution, to join this this group you should 
>> meet the following requirements:
>> 
>> 1. Linkedin profile
>> 
>> 2. Business email address and website
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> ___
>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>> 
>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
> 
> ___
> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
> 
> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
 ___
 Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
 
 iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>> 
>> ___
>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Dat

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Pause in speed dial

[CCIEing]

This feature can be found in cucm 9.x,
I am not sure if it is there in CME 9

Sent from my iPhone

On May 9, 2014, at 4:22 PM, "Minh Dang"  wrote:

> Group,
>  
> We have a corporate directory that include extensions. Just wonder if i could 
> insert pause when dialing out with speed dial.
>  
> Our system include CME 9.x and IP Phones 7965s, 7975s, 7942s…
>  
> Thank you in advance,
>  
> Minh
>  
> ___
> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
> 
> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
___
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCE Script: Transfer Call to IP Phone UCCE Script

[CCIEing]

The CVP LOG is here , I can find the call

ne 16730: 36821876: 192.168.70.118: Apr 08 2014 11:33:02.683 +0200:
%CVP_9_0_SIP-5-SIP_INFO:  Added StaticRoute: patterns like *{07}>* will
route to 192.168.XX.XXX [id:5000]
Line 16778: 36821886: 192.168.70.118: Apr 08 2014 11:33:02.730 +0200:
%CVP_9_0_SIP-5-SIP_INFO:  Added StaticRoute: patterns like *{07}>* will
route to 192.168.XX.XXX [id:5000]

Where {07} is the PSTN number
192.168.XX.XXX is the CUCM IP Address


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:26 PM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Hi Dears,
>
> Thanks for the contribution , I was able to transfer the call to any
> extension within the call manager, by adding a dynamic label node on my ICM
> script, then add the needed static route in the CVP pointing back to CUCM.
> But the strange thing is, I am not able to transfer that call to any PSTN
> number, which should be the same way. the call routing to the PSTN from the
> CUCM is working fine
>
> Any Idea My friends ?
>
> Thanks Again
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:25 PM, John V. Casale wrote:
>
>> Andy is correct.  Use a label node in the ICM script and send the call
>> wherever you want (PSTN, IP Phone, etc.)
>>
>> Unless they added UCCE to the CCIE Collab (they didn't), not sure how
>> anything related to UCCE is relevant on this list.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> *John V. Casale*
>> Cell: (919) 371-8541
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Andy Thanh wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> you can create a Label for a IP phone extension but you need to make
>>> sure to create the correct routing client label and you need to track where
>>> the label returned to. Let say, if there are a CVP system need to get the
>>> label, you need to crate dial plan on CVP and point back to CUCM.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Pavan K  wrote:
>>>
>>>> As for the original question, it should be possible to return a label
>>>> to whatever target on UCM in the ICM script. Am I missing something non
>>>> trivial?
>>>>  On Apr 6, 2014 1:19 PM, "Chrysostomos Christofi" <
>>>> ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have CUE you can achieve this task in the same way as into UCCX
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> #Chrysostomos
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>>>>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *CCIEing
>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, April 6, 2014 9:28 AM
>>>>> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>>>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCE Script: Transfer Call to IP Phone
>>>>> UCCE Script
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Group Members,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would to ask about this feature ..After a time check (if the time
>>>>> after mid night) I have a UCCE system and I need to create a script that
>>>>> allow the call to be transferred to an IP Phone (Not Agent) just a number
>>>>> or PSTN number , the most important is "This is not agent".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As you may all know this is easy from the UCCX , but is that doable
>>>>> from UCCE ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos
>>>>> ::
>>>>>
>>>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>>>
>>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>>
>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>
>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>
>
>
___
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCE Script: Transfer Call to IP Phone UCCE Script

[CCIEing]

Hi Dears,

Thanks for the contribution , I was able to transfer the call to any
extension within the call manager, by adding a dynamic label node on my ICM
script, then add the needed static route in the CVP pointing back to CUCM.
But the strange thing is, I am not able to transfer that call to any PSTN
number, which should be the same way. the call routing to the PSTN from the
CUCM is working fine

Any Idea My friends ?

Thanks Again


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:25 PM, John V. Casale wrote:

> Andy is correct.  Use a label node in the ICM script and send the call
> wherever you want (PSTN, IP Phone, etc.)
>
> Unless they added UCCE to the CCIE Collab (they didn't), not sure how
> anything related to UCCE is relevant on this list.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> *John V. Casale*
> Cell: (919) 371-8541
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Andy Thanh wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> you can create a Label for a IP phone extension but you need to make sure
>> to create the correct routing client label and you need to track where the
>> label returned to. Let say, if there are a CVP system need to get the
>> label, you need to crate dial plan on CVP and point back to CUCM.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Pavan K  wrote:
>>
>>> As for the original question, it should be possible to return a label to
>>> whatever target on UCM in the ICM script. Am I missing something non
>>> trivial?
>>>  On Apr 6, 2014 1:19 PM, "Chrysostomos Christofi" <
>>> ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you have CUE you can achieve this task in the same way as into UCCX
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> #Chrysostomos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>>>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *CCIEing
>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, April 6, 2014 9:28 AM
>>>> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCE Script: Transfer Call to IP Phone
>>>> UCCE Script
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Group Members,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would to ask about this feature ..After a time check (if the time
>>>> after mid night) I have a UCCE system and I need to create a script that
>>>> allow the call to be transferred to an IP Phone (Not Agent) just a number
>>>> or PSTN number , the most important is "This is not agent".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As you may all know this is easy from the UCCX , but is that doable
>>>> from UCCE ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>>>
>>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>>
>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>
>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>
>
>
> ___
> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>
> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>
___
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCE Script: Transfer Call to IP Phone UCCE Script

[CCIEing]

Dear Group Members,

I would to ask about this feature ..After a time check (if the time after
mid night) I have a UCCE system and I need to create a script that allow
the call to be transferred to an IP Phone (Not Agent) just a number or PSTN
number , the most important is "This is not agent".

As you may all know this is easy from the UCCX , but is that doable from
UCCE ?

Thanks
___
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AXL servers and CUC

[CCIEing]

Why the guys keep getting not 100% in voicemail integration, what common 
mistakes happened 

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 25, 2013, at 12:42 AM, William Bell  wrote:

> In this instance, best practice is a relative concept. Many applications 
> leverage AXL to retrieve information and you can leverage that API to 
> retrieve information on any node in the cluster. Applications that push 
> configurations should be leveraging the publisher to do so. That said, I 
> would think that you could send a SQL update, addphone, updateuser, etc. AXL 
> command to a subscriber node. Of course, it would only succeed if the 
> publisher node is on line.
> 
> Anyway, my policy is to enable a secondary AXL server in the cluster if I 
> have applications that are leveraging AXL to pull information. Like CUxAC, 
> CUC, UCM IM/P, etc. CCX actually writes using the AXL API. Not that having a 
> redundant AXL server would hurt but if I just have CCX and UCM, I typically 
> go with a single AXL instance. 
> 
> IMO, you will not "harm" your cluster if you enable AXL on subsequent nodes 
> in the cluster. You must have it on the first node (pub) if you are going to 
> have it at all.
> 
> In the IE lab, at least the current blue print, you will want to enable the 
> AXL service on both Pub and Sub. If for no other reason than to avoid goofy 
> issues during initialization of CUE in a scenario where CUE registers 
> directly to UCM.
> 
> HTH.
> 
> -Bill
> 
> 
> --
> William Bell, CCIE #38914
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> twitter: @ucguerrilla
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:38 PM, probert...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have few questions related to AXL servers and CUC. Should CUC be 
>> configured to use both sub and pub as AXL servers?
>> 
>> According to doc: 
>> Cisco AXL Web Service
>> 
>> Activate on the first node only. Failing to activate this service causes the 
>> inability to update Cisco Unified Communications Manager from client-based 
>> applications that use AXL.
>> 
>> 
>> But as far as I know CUC will not be updating anything on CUCM using AXL it 
>> is just used to read data during the user import.   So since AXL can be 
>> activated on SUB can we use it with CUC? I know it works I just want best 
>> practice, if we don't than we have no redundancy. I guess this also applies 
>> to UCCX. 
>> 
>> Should we activate AXL on sub in the lab and should we configure CUC to use 
>> both AXL servers in the lab? 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME/B-ACD Documents in revamped Documentation Support page

[CCIEing]

But the question is that..
Does the search supported in the website in real lab?


On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Todd Carswell  wrote:

> I noticed the same thing.  From the main documentation page, just type
> "Communications Manager Express" in the "Find" section and it'll come right
> up.
>
> --Todd
>
> > On Oct 24, 2013, at 7:51 AM, StefanoS  wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > This is a silly question, maybe I'm too tired but I'll ask anyway.
> > A couple of days before Cisco did a "rearrangement" in Documentation
> Support page. So for example the section for UCM documents went under
> Products > Unified Communications > Call Control, or phones under Products
> > Collaboration Endpoints > Phones etc.
> >
> > I've found some but I can't find the path for the CME category and B-ACD
> docs path anywhere. It's not under CUCM (Call Manager) in Call Control
> section as I was expecting. So where is it?
> >
> > Thank's in advance.
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA the right way to configure it

[CCIEing]

Can you past your config here to see what you did?

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 28, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Bashar Aziz  wrote:

> 
> Why I am getting 0% in Voice Gateway and Signalling for the 6th time, 100% 
> tested and worked, what is the trick ?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:29 PM, sanity insanity 
>  wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> Thanks once again for your replies.
> 
> @Lakshmish using your method of creating a seperate partition for RDP  ( on 
> the left side)  and not having the SB PH1 have access to it .  I noticed that 
> when a call is made from PSTN ( with calling number 525)  to 3300  and if 
> we enter the pin and dial a number say 2001 ( internal)  . The  2001 phone 
> rings and the call can be answered.
> 
> However the SBPH1 ( physical phone)  is unable show that  the  3001 line is 
> active by showing a red light  and therefore this does not appear to the 
> requirement for MVA is achieved . What do you think?
> 
> -MJ
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Lakshmish NS  wrote:
> Hi MJ, 
> 
> Martin is right, I had issues with SNR after configuring the RD to 7 digits 
> and setting the service parameter to complete match, MVA and SNR wouldn't go 
> together. Martin however has proposed a new fix, you could try it. The 
> workaround I used for this was to create an "Application Dial Rule", which 
> would certainly solve the issue.
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Laksh
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Martin Sloan  wrote:
> Hi MJ,
> 
> 1) If you set the partial match to 7 digits and then configure your remote 
> destination as a 10 digit number, you'll get a match if the ANI is either 7 
> or 10 digits since the match rule takes 'X' partial-match digits from the RD 
> starting with the last number (2 in this case) and compares it to the ANI of 
> the calling number, but the calling party number must be equal to or shorter 
> in length than the configured remote destination, which is why it's good to 
> just set your RD at 10+ digits if you're using partial match.  Here are some 
> scenarios and the outcome for partial match:
> 
> Partial Match = True 
> Number of Digits For Match = 7 digits
> Remote Destination = 972525
> Calling Party Number = 525
> Result = Match
> 
> Partial Match = True 
> Number of Digits For Match = 7 digits
> Remote Destination = 972525
> Calling Party Number = 972525
> Result = Match
> 
> Partial Match = True 
> Number of Digits For Match = 7 digits
> Remote Destination = 525
> Calling Party Number = 525
> Result = Match
> 
> Partial Match = True 
> Number of Digits For Match = 7 digits
> Remote Destination = 525
> Calling Party Number = 972525
> Result = No Match (ANI is longer than RD)
> 
> When using Complete match, the ANI and RD have to be exactly the same.  I 
> like to make a call into SB from the PSTN phone prior to configuring SNR and 
> I can quickly see what the ANI is, which is what I then make my RD.
> 
> I had mentioned some buggy behavior with SNR though I never spent time 
> working with partial match since when I heard about that issue I just stuck 
> with complete match but I wanted to test my info above to make sure I wasn't 
> sending incorrect info. It wasn't too hard to run into this buggy behavior.  
> I found a workaround as well so I thought I'd share.
> 
> When changing the Complete Match service parameter to Partial Match you get a 
> screen pop that says to remember and set the "Number of Digits for Caller ID 
> Partial Match" service parameter.  The default for that parameter is 10 and 
> the bug that I found is that on the initial change from default 10 to 7, the 
> new setting does not take effect.  After changing from 10->7 I started to 
> make test calls and my CLID to SB PH1 was showing as the 7 digit ANI of the 
> PSTN phone and not "SB PHONE 2 3002" like it should.  I dug around for a bit 
> and tweaked a couple parameters and re-tested.  The deal is that you have 
> change Complete Match to Partial Match -> Save then change Partial Match 
> digits from 10 to 7 and Save again.
> 
> 2) For this one if your service parameter is set to Complete Match and your 
> ANI is 7 digits, just set your RD to the 7 digit number then use route 
> patterns/xlations to manipulate as needed.
> 
> 3) Not sure about that one.  I've definitely seen conflicting information on 
> certain things but I've realized that some of the training material is years 
> in the making and when things are discovered or updated, maybe the old 
> information is not or it's just floating out there.  I can confirm that based 
> on some recent experience with trusted trainers it was reiterated not to use 
> partial match, maybe in part because of the issue that I hit today.
> 
> Marty
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:19 AM, sanity insanity 
>  wrote:
> Hi Guys ,
> 
> Thanks a lot for taking time out to reply to my  question. It was really 
> helpful.
> 
>  I was trying to understand the difference between full match  with 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cups best practice

[CCIEing]

I do not set to the exam yet.. but here are below the steps I use to
configure my CUPS:

CUPC Configuration (Softphone)

Form CUPS Side :

   - Application --> Settings
   - Application --> CUCP --> add Voice Mail Server
   - Application --> CUCP --> add Mail Store (default 143)
   -  Application --> CUPC --> add Voicemail Profile , then add users to
   this profile
   - Application --> CUCP --> add CTI Gateway (should be created automatic
   when start services )
   - Application --> CUCP --> add CTI Gateway Profile

Form CUCM Side :

   - Add CUPC soft phone: Device --> add Cisco Unified Personal
   Communicator with the name UPCUSERNAME

Desk phone Configuration

   - CUCM --> Associate device to end user (End user configuration page-->
   add the device in the Device association list )
   - CUCM --> Specify Primary extension for the end user (the same Ext on
   his device)
   - CUCM --> Add the user to the groups (Standard CTI enables & CUCM end
   user)
   - CUPS --> Assign user to the CTI Gateway profile (the one that relative
   to the user's phone DP)
   - Login/logout from the CUPC and test.



On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Karen Johnson wrote:

> hi experts,
>
> can anyone share how to config desk mode and soft mode best practice for
> CUPS in exam?  I can't figure out why did not got point for cups even it is
> working fine.
>
> tks
>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctorlabs replication

[CCIEing]

Did you try to disable csa?


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Karen Johnson wrote:

> hi all,
>
> I used auto phone register in proctorlabs. When UCM group start with SUB,
> phone never registered.
> But when I move PUB to 1st Server in Group, phone registered fine.
>
> And I also checked in "Cisco CallManager Reporting for DB summary:
> replication look good 2" and CLI also look good
>
> any idea what wrong and what is command to check in this case?
>
> tks
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS

[CCIEing]

HI All,

I am really struggling with QOS

I can understand what this command means :

mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3  5

How to use it ???
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ssh client

[CCIEing]

So how to increase the buffer :) 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 15, 2013, at 1:47 AM, "Barrera, Hugo"  wrote:

> This dang client cost me about 20 min in the Lab because I didn't know how to 
> increase the buffer. 
> 
> Regards,
> Hugo
> 
> On May 14, 2013, at 3:32 PM, "Bill"  wrote:
> 
>> I think it is an old version of secure CRT and not one easily found on the 
>> web.  I think something like version 3 or 4 but I really did not worry about 
>> that, I use the current version and it works similar but don't expect much 
>> more that very basic interface
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On May 14, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem  
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I think it should be v2 however I am not quite sure
>>> 
>>> On 14 May 2013 15:07, Barrera, Hugo  wrote:
>>> Anybody know what version of ssh client that is in the real lab on the CUPC 
>>> Test PC?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> - Hugo
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> 
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> 
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Name for MVA

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

I had the following problem , when I make a call from remote Destination to
the MVA IVR number, then to internal extension, the calling name for the
configured in the line for the remote destination profile does not appear
on the internal phone when it answered the call, this happen only when I
use the enable inbound faststart with my h323 gateway (where the MVA
configured) .

If I unchecked the inbound faststart the calling name appear.


any idea ?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can't get to proctorlabs

[CCIEing]

It is working just now

Sent from my iPhone

On May 14, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Josh Petro  wrote:

> Hi Randall,
> I also can get to their site and I'm able to login. I don't have any rack 
> time now, so I obviously cannot check that far, but I was able to get to 
> their site. The site came up very slowly, just FYI.
> Josh
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Randall Saborio  wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> Anyone can just give it a quick check and let me know?
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Randall Saborio  wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> Just checking if is it my provider or proctorlabs problem.
> 
> Can't open up proctorlabs.com and I am missing my session already  :(
> 
> -- 
> Randall "da ill" Saborio
> CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Randall "da ill" Saborio
> CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection & Unity Express Ports Region Interregion Relationship

[CCIEing]

You need transcoder on the hq side 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 2, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Hesham Abdelkereem  wrote:

> Dear Experts,
>  
> I'd like to ask when I configure the Regions between HQ , SB and SC
> Usually for Interregion relationship is G729 Codec is used while for 
> Intraregion we use G711 Codec.
> So , In case of the Unity Connection and Unity Express. I wonder if i should 
> apply the same rule on them?
> On Unity Connection it has Device Pool and usually you apply HQ for it.
> So When SB communicates with unity then is it should be G729
> What is your recommendation of how to make it in the test?
>  
> Thanks,
> Hesham
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] G729 Only for UCCX

[CCIEing]

Step 1: i think call manager will generate all type of codec when you upload 
the file, so you can upload the g711 version copy.

Step 4: you need to select both codec as the g711 will be used in case the call 
happened between 2 end points in same region

Sent from my iPhone

On May 9, 2013, at 12:09 AM, "Barrera, Hugo"  wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> I have put together this list from labbing and I wanted to get feedback if 
> you think my steps are in the right direction or I entirely missing something 
> hear?
>  
> Step 1. On uccx grab ringback.wav file (shouldn't we be grabbing the file 
> from the g729 folder and not the g711 folder?) 
> Step 2. Upload this wav file to both cucm servers
> Step 3. Apply this file as the network on hold audio source thru uccx for CTI 
> Ports and CTI-RP's 
> Step 4. Go into the IPVMSA service and ensure both g711 and g729 codecs are 
> selected (Or should I be selecting g729 only?) 
> Step 5. Restart IPVMSA service on both cucm servers 
>  
> Thanks
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Control IP Phones while in SRST

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

when IP Phones goes to SRST mode.. (normal call-manager-fallback)

how I can see that phone, how to control it, I need to make calls from that
phone..

While the phone is register with call manager I can control it via
phoneview.. but when it went to SRST mode , how to control the phone ??

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Debug ISDn q931

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

Some times when I debug isdn q931 , I am not able to see the calling number
on the debug.. only the called number appear..


any idea ???
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Expert Phone view stop working

[CCIEing]

Hi All,

does any one has any idea about the phone view used by ip experts..

I was working normal, when it stop respond to my transactions.. I am able
to see the phones from call manager.. but a I am no longer able to make any
transaction on the phone,  it always give me failure!!!


any idea.

any other software to control my ip phones in the racks ???
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VM Message button gives "No services configured"

[CCIEing]

Did you configure the vicemail profile??

How about your voicemail services , double check if it is exists under
Device--> device settings --> phone services 

If it is not found you have to create it 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 8, 2013, at 2:37 PM, Vikky Kumar  wrote:

> Hi Experts, 
> 
> I am getting no services configured when i press VM Message button
> 
> Please advise.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Vikky
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Sending Calling Name to PSTN

[CCIEing]

For mgcp, from rote pattern configuration , you have to allow sending the 
calling name.

For h323 under interface serial configuration ( for the used pri)
You have to use the commands 
Isdn outgoing ie display
Isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 7, 2013, at 1:44 PM, CISCO CCIE VOICE  wrote:

> Hi Experts,
> 
> How can i send Calling name to PSTN over MGCP and H323 Gateway?
> 
> thanks
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE signaling QOS on switch

[CCIEing]

Dears,

So the above access list is correct ?? CUE signaling traffic only used this
port ? 2748
Is there any document showed the used port for the CUE traffic ??



On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Jack Kamina  wrote:

> on one of the practice lab the need is to police the signaling packets to
> and from CUE inbound into the HQ switch to 32 kbps and then remark the DSCP
> to 0. I built up the config below but dont see any packets matched on the
> show policy-map interface command. CUE IP is 10.1.6.253 . CUCM IP is
> 10.10.210.10 (pub) and 10.10.210.11 (sub) .is the access list built
> correctly?
>
> access-list 110 permit tcp host *10.1.6.253* any eq 2748
>
> !
>
> class-map match-all CUE-SIGNAL
>
>  match access-group 110
>
> !
>
> policy-map CUEMAP
>
>  class cti-qbe
>
>  set dscp af31
>
>  bandwidth 20
>
> !
>
> interface Fa0/1/0
>
> description  HQ-ROUTER-INTERFACE
>
>  service-policy input CUEMAP
>
>
> mls
>  qos
> mls qos map cos 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
> mls qos map policed-dscp 24 26 to 8
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translate DSCP values to Numbers

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

Is there any document tell how to translate  the  DSCP values for
hexadecimal  to number

i.e DSCP EF == 46
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CEM as SRST, SiteC

[CCIEing]

Thanks So much, your input is really helpful


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Suresh Bhandari  wrote:

> srst mode auto-provision all displays all learned ephones and DNs in your
> running configuration in SRST mode. You can tweak the configuration as per
> requirement. It also preserves those learned ephones and DNs even after the
> gateway re-registers to the CUCM. srst-mode auto-pro none will not
> display/store the learned DNs, so no chances of tweaking of ephones or DNs
> to meet some requirement.
>
> IPExpert has a very good set of articles on the topic of your interest:
> https://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Voice/Free-Resources
>
> Check the High Availability section. You can find the different types of
> HA, and their differences, as well.
>
> HTH
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:19 AM, CCIEing  wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> In case the HA requirements was to use SRST, then which command to use
>>
>> Srst mode auto-provision all
>>
>> or
>> Srst mode auto-provision none ?
>>
>> and what is the difference between them ,
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Suresh Bhandari
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CEM as SRST, SiteC

[CCIEing]

Dear All,

In case the HA requirements was to use SRST, then which command to use

Srst mode auto-provision all

or
Srst mode auto-provision none ?

and what is the difference between them ,

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ incoming calls Filed until I reload the router

[CCIEing]

Yes


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Bill Lake  wrote:

> Was this an MGCP gateway?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 18, 2013, at 6:24 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Very strange thing happen 2 times during my practice to lab,
> >
> > the calls to hq failed until i reload the router
> >
> > before reload, ISDN status was ok
> >
> > mgcp gateways was registered and everything seems to be fine, the call
> arrive the gateway  but the phone does not ring, then call dropped ..
> >
> > Only when I reload the router of HQ things come fine!!!
> >
> > DO I am hitting a bug or what ?
> >
> > What do you think Guys
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ incoming calls Filed until I reload the router

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

Very strange thing happen 2 times during my practice to lab,

the calls to hq failed until i reload the router

before reload, ISDN status was ok

mgcp gateways was registered and everything seems to be fine, the call
arrive the gateway  but the phone does not ring, then call dropped ..

Only when I reload the router of HQ things come fine!!!

DO I am hitting a bug or what ?

What do you think Guys
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert SiteB DID's

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

For the seek of solving the MVA task for siteB, a DID number needed.

How to know the range of DID's for the T1 PRI used with Site B?

Appreciate your input
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Full Lab, More than one question

[CCIEing]

Thank man for your input.
Appreciate it


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Chrysostomos Christofi <
ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:

>  Hi
>
> ** **
>
> Answers  below with red
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *CCIEing
> *Sent:* 18 April 2013 03:17
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Full Lab, More than one question
>
> ** **
>
> Hi All,
>
> ** **
>
> Today I tried to make a full lab , it was my 1st try to do all tasks in 8
> hours session!
>
> ** **
>
> the following questions appeared :
>
> ** **
>
> 1-Do i need to enable the auto registration on both CUCM servers,
> including the starting/End DN information ? 
>
> No its ok with only one cucm server
>
> ** **
>
> 2-  When you use the auto registration method to register your phone,
> what exactly define which device pool the new registered phone will belong
> to  
>
> The default device pool. Then edit to the correct. Note that sometimes you
> get an error with the auto registration so you have to disable all the
> security services at both cucms and ADD the phones manually 
>
> ** **
>
> 3- What can be checked if SiteB Routed was not synchronized wirt
> HQ-Router, my router stay un-synchronize 
>
> Which interface in HQ router is the ntp master? If is the loopback then
> try to add ip ospf network point-to-point into the HQ Loopback interface**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> 4- When it comes to any update of the Ringlists, do I need to restart TFTP
> service in both servers, and does it mandatory to upload the Files to both
> TFTP?
>
> Yes for both questions
>
> And Finally, I really shocked how much time the full lab needs, I did not
> finish 50 % of the lab in the 8 hours, I really need your advise regarding
> the time challenge !!
>
> The best choice is the device base approach. Search into YouTube to
> understand the process
>
> Best Regards
>
> ** **
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Full Lab, More than one question

[CCIEing]

Hi All,

Today I tried to make a full lab , it was my 1st try to do all tasks in 8
hours session!

the following questions appeared :

1-Do i need to enable the auto registration on both CUCM servers, including
the starting/End DN information ?

2-  When you use the auto registration method to register your phone,
what exactly define which device pool the new registered phone will belong
to

3- What can be checked if SiteB Routed was not synchronized wirt HQ-Router,
my router stay un-synchronize

4- When it comes to any update of the Ringlists, do I need to restart TFTP
service in both servers, and does it mandatory to upload the Files to both
TFTP?

And Finally, I really shocked how much time the full lab needs, I did not
finish 50 % of the lab in the 8 hours, I really need your advise regarding
the time challenge !!

Best Regards
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SiteB Phones are not talking IP Address

[CCIEing]

Hi Josh,

You mean the voice sub interface ?
And the native vlan will be the data vlan??

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Josh Petro  wrote:

> Also, to echo Bills point number 2, make sure the "encapsulation dotq1 xx 
> native" command is configured on the router. That burned me twice early on.
> Josh
> 
> On Monday, April 15, 2013, William Bell wrote:
> I'd check:
> 
> 1. DHCP snooping on the switch (sh ip dhcp snoop)
> 
> 2. Dot1q trunk on HQ-RTR interface (on the switch). Make sure that all 
> appropriate vlans are allowed on the trunk link and that native VLAN lines up 
> (1 is default). 
> 
> 3. Ensure VLANs are provisioned correctly, assigned to the right interfaces, 
> and active (sh vlan b)
> 
> 4. Double check scope config on CUCM Pub. Check each parameter. 
> 
> If the above check out then I'd restart the DHCP service on the Pub. 
> 
> If that didn't work, I would do the following on the phone:
> 
> 1. Settings key
> 2. **# to unlock
> 3. Press "more" softkey when it pops up
> 4. Press "Erase" softkey
> 
> -Bill
> 
> --
> William Bell, CCIE #38914
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> twitter: @ucguerrilla
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 15, 2013, at 8:16 PM, CCIEing wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> I am using proctorlabs racks, My siteB phone are not talking IP addresses 
>> from CUCM-PUB DHCP.
>> 
>> I have configured the switch port connected to the IP phone with the correct 
>> access/voice vlan informaation. I also apply the IP hdcp helper-address 
>> command on the voice-vlan interface on the router, and pointed to the IP 
>> address of CUCM-PUB.
>> 
>> When debuging IP dhcp server events/packets the router show the following 
>> messages :
>> 
>> Apr 16 00:09:53.946: DHCPD: Finding a relay for client 0100.12d9.78ef.01 on 
>> interface Vlan240.
>> Apr 16 00:09:53.946: DHCPD: Seeing if there is an internally specified pool 
>> class:
>> Apr 16 00:09:53.946:   DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 0012.d978.ef01
>> Apr 16 00:09:53.946:   DHCPD: remote id 020a0a0ac90110f0
>> Apr 16 00:09:53.950:   DHCPD: circuit id 
>> Apr 16 00:09:53.950: DHCPD: there is no pool for 10.10.201.1.
>> Apr 16 00:09:53.950: DHCPD: setting giaddr to 10.10.201.1.
>> Apr 16 00:09:53.950: DHCPD: BOOTREQUEST from 0100.12d9.78ef.01 forwarded to 
>> 10.10.210.10.
>> 
>> Any Idea Please !
>> 
>> Thanks in advance 
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy

[CCIEing]

Dear All,

In the devise base strategy  which is better to start with the CUCM and the
applications or to start with the Router devices ??

I believe to start with CUCM is better that allow the phones to register
earlier, as all your testing then will depend on it.

Appreciate your feedback and advice




On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Dane Warner wrote:

> To All,
>
> ** **
>
> I took my second attempt on Monday, March 25 and did not pass.
>
> I was hoping for some insight on concrete suggestions to get faster. 
>
> I didn’t get hung up on any one task, I seemed to keep moving forward and
> tried to type as fast as I could, using CLI shortcuts, etc.
>
> I used the device-based methodology and I feel pretty confident of my
> technical knowledge.
>
> Yet I didn’t even get to many tasks at all, I would have needed another
> 2-3 hours to complete all tasks.
>
> I hear of candidates completing all tasks in 6-7 hours, which means I
> would need to become twice as fast as my last attempt.
>
> It almost sounds insurmountable. Do I need to take typing classes?
>
> ** **
>
> Any recommendations that don’t break the NDA would be greatly appreciated.
> 
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,
>
> ** **
>
> *Dane Warner, CCVP*
>
> *Sr. Network Engineer*
>
> *Epoch Universal, Inc.*
>
> *(909)226-0755*
>
> *dwar...@epochuniversal.com  *
>
> *[image: Epoch_Logo_Smaller_Transparent]*
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Back to back session IPexperts racks

[CCIEing]

Dears,,

When I reserve a back to back racks sessions , does the pod number changed?

does my configuration removed one I go from one time session to the next
one

Appreciated
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SiteB Phones are not talking IP Address

[CCIEing]

Dear all,

I am using proctorlabs racks, My siteB phone are not talking IP addresses
from CUCM-PUB DHCP.

I have configured the switch port connected to the IP phone with the
correct access/voice vlan informaation. I also apply the IP hdcp
helper-address command on the voice-vlan interface on the router, and
pointed to the IP address of CUCM-PUB.

When debuging IP dhcp server events/packets the router show the following
messages :

Apr 16 00:09:53.946: DHCPD: Finding a relay for client 0100.12d9.78ef.01 on
interface Vlan240.
Apr 16 00:09:53.946: DHCPD: Seeing if there is an internally specified pool
class:
Apr 16 00:09:53.946:   DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 0012.d978.ef01
Apr 16 00:09:53.946:   DHCPD: remote id 020a0a0ac90110f0
Apr 16 00:09:53.950:   DHCPD: circuit id 
Apr 16 00:09:53.950: DHCPD: there is no pool for 10.10.201.1.
Apr 16 00:09:53.950: DHCPD: setting giaddr to 10.10.201.1.
Apr 16 00:09:53.950: DHCPD: BOOTREQUEST from 0100.12d9.78ef.01 forwarded to
10.10.210.10.

Any Idea Please !

Thanks in advance
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7941 won't take the siteC router as SRST

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

I have 2 phones connected to my SiteC switch, both of them configured to be
in Site device pool. when I drop the WAN connection between SiteC and HQ,
only my 7960 phone goes in SRST . but my 7941 phone does not .. when i try
to check the phone url , it does not show that information of SRST ip !!

any idea ..

Appreciated
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Forwarded Routing Rule in CUC

[CCIEing]

Dear All,

I have an issue with CUC --> call routing --> forward routing rules,

when add new rule with condition Forwarding Station = 0998

where 0998 is DN on CTRP that has the CFW_ALL to voice mail

it does not work at ALL

any help?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Call Routing

[CCIEing]

Thanks Justin,

I will adopt your strategy




On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Justin Carney wrote:

> I don't know how the lab is graded, but I first answer the requirements of
> the question, which sometimes states to set proper plan/type and sometimes
> unknown, then for all other call flows that don't specify I set the proper
> plan/type for those.  I do this for both ani and dnis.
>
> There are two reasons why I do this - first, I type all the CLI in notepad
> and configure all the routers at the beginning of the lab (after taking
> basic notes on gw type, # of channels, etc) and then I go through the gw
> and call routing sections and modify as needed.  Second, it can make
> reading debugs a little easier as I am used to verifying plan/type for all
> calls and I only need to make a note of which calls require unknown as the
> exceptions.
>
> Hope this helps...
>
> -Justin
>  On Mar 30, 2013 2:04 PM, "CCIEing"  wrote:
>
>> Hi again for all,
>>
>> I have question regarding the exam, in the CUCM call routing section :
>>
>> If the question does not clearly mention that the Called Party Type and
>> plan is required in some parts of the call routing points..
>>
>> Is it better to configure the them (call type and plan) or to leave them
>> on the default configuration ?
>>
>>
>> Your input is appreciated
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Call Routing

[CCIEing]

Hi again for all,

I have question regarding the exam, in the CUCM call routing section :

If the question does not clearly mention that the Called Party Type and
plan is required in some parts of the call routing points..

Is it better to configure the them (call type and plan) or to leave them on
the default configuration ?


Your input is appreciated
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP DHCP failed assigning IP's

[CCIEing]

OH what a mistake !!!

I updated my config to the correct one

*ip dhcp excluded-address 177.3.11.1 177.3.11.25*
*ip dhcp excluded-address 177.3.11.28 177.3.11.254*
*
*
*
*
*:)*


On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:22 PM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I configured a DCHP pool , ip phones failed to get IP's
>
> when debug the IP hdcp server event and packets I got the following error
>
> "*DHCPD: Allocate an address without class information (177.3.11.0)*
> *DHCPD: subnet [177.3.11.1,177.3.11.254] in address pool sitec is empty.*
> *DHCPD: Sending notification of ASSIGNMENT FAILURE:*
> *  DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 001d.45e8.a5e6*
> *  DHCPD: remote id 020ab1030b01000b*
> *  DHCPD: circuit id *
> *DHCPD: Sending notification of ASSIGNMENT_FAILURE:*
> * DHCPD: due to: POOL EXHAUSTED*
> *  DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 001d.45e8.a5e6*
> *  DHCPD: remote id 020ab1030b01000b*
> *  DHCPD: circuit id *"
>
> Here is my configuration :
>
> *ip dhcp excluded-address 177.3.11.1 177.3.11.25*
> *ip dhcp excluded-address 177.3.11.26 177.3.11.254*
> *!*
> *ip dhcp pool sitec*
> *   network 177.3.11.0 255.255.255.0*
> *   default-router 177.3.11.1 *
> *   option 150 ip 177.1.10.20 177.1.10.10*
> *
> *
> Any Idea 
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP DHCP failed assigning IP's

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

I configured a DCHP pool , ip phones failed to get IP's

when debug the IP hdcp server event and packets I got the following error

"*DHCPD: Allocate an address without class information (177.3.11.0)*
*DHCPD: subnet [177.3.11.1,177.3.11.254] in address pool sitec is empty.*
*DHCPD: Sending notification of ASSIGNMENT FAILURE:*
*  DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 001d.45e8.a5e6*
*  DHCPD: remote id 020ab1030b01000b*
*  DHCPD: circuit id *
*DHCPD: Sending notification of ASSIGNMENT_FAILURE:*
* DHCPD: due to: POOL EXHAUSTED*
*  DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 001d.45e8.a5e6*
*  DHCPD: remote id 020ab1030b01000b*
*  DHCPD: circuit id *"

Here is my configuration :

*ip dhcp excluded-address 177.3.11.1 177.3.11.25*
*ip dhcp excluded-address 177.3.11.26 177.3.11.254*
*!*
*ip dhcp pool sitec*
*   network 177.3.11.0 255.255.255.0*
*   default-router 177.3.11.1 *
*   option 150 ip 177.1.10.20 177.1.10.10*
*
*
Any Idea 



Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy

[CCIEing]

Hi Jamie,

Would you please explain this more :

"  ***You have to setup most devices with little or no prior configuration,
there are things that cannot change. Know these things and practice them
over and over so you do not have to think about them* "

Thanks in advance




On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) wrote:

>  First attempt I was very slow – did not use the device based approach,
> did not finish all tasks. Second I was much faster – using the device based
> approach, finished with 3 hours to test. Third attempt I finished with more
> than 3 hours to test and pick up the issues – Passed
>
> ** **
>
> My advice:
>
> **· **I found the more I practiced the faster I got, practice
> practice practice
>
> **· **Use notepad to write all your device configs first, you can
> copy and paste large sections of config saving a lot of time
>
> **· **Do not be so strict to the device based approach, use it as
> a base and create your own hybrid
>
> **· **You have to setup most devices with little or no prior
> configuration, there are things that cannot change. Know these things and
> practice them over and over so you do not have to think about them
>
> **· **Persevere, it’s not easy and it sucks most of the time but
> you will get there
>
> ** **
>
> Hope this helps
>
> ** **
>
> *Jamie Parr*
>
> CCIE #38633 (voice)
> Engineer - IT
> jamp...@cisco.com
> Phone: *+44 20 8824 2641*
> Mobile: *+44 7590622049*
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Dane Warner
> *Sent:* 26 March 2013 23:41
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy
>
> ** **
>
> To All,
>
> ** **
>
> I took my second attempt on Monday, March 25 and did not pass.
>
> I was hoping for some insight on concrete suggestions to get faster. 
>
> I didn’t get hung up on any one task, I seemed to keep moving forward and
> tried to type as fast as I could, using CLI shortcuts, etc.
>
> I used the device-based methodology and I feel pretty confident of my
> technical knowledge.
>
> Yet I didn’t even get to many tasks at all, I would have needed another
> 2-3 hours to complete all tasks.
>
> I hear of candidates completing all tasks in 6-7 hours, which means I
> would need to become twice as fast as my last attempt.
>
> It almost sounds insurmountable. Do I need to take typing classes?
>
> ** **
>
> Any recommendations that don’t break the NDA would be greatly appreciated.
> 
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,
>
> ** **
>
> *Dane Warner, CCVP*
>
> *Sr. Network Engineer*
>
> *Epoch Universal, Inc.*
>
> *(909)226-0755*
>
> *dwar...@epochuniversal.com  *
>
> *[image: Epoch_Logo_Smaller_Transparent]*
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA functionality

[CCIEing]

Hello Friends...

I have the following setup, I am not sure if the will be suitable to enable
the MVA feature !

I have CUCM cluster, but his CUCM cluster has no voice GW or DID .. but
this CUCM cluster has Inter-cluster trunk to another CUCM cluster which has
the DID numbers ?

Can I configure the MVA for this setup..

Appreciate your input.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Outgoing Calls via T1 failed

[CCIEing]

Hi,

Changing the selection to top down solve the issue :)

thanks

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:27 AM, ikizoo4 kwon  wrote:

> use Topdwon for channel selection order in GW
>
> --
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:52:10 +0300
> From: aboaz...@gmail.com
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Outgoing Calls via T1 failed
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> After configuring my HQ GW as MGCP, then configure my T1 to register with
> cucm , I was govern by the lack of the DSP resources, which force me to
> define only 16 channel out of the 23 on my pri-group under the T1
> controller configuration  !!
>
> here is the config :
>
> controller T1 0/0/0
> pri-group timeslots 1-16 service mgcp
>
> Then I faced a problem with my outgoing calls , the calls was dropping due
> to the cause "*Requested circuit/channel not available*"
>
> My Question here, as there is 16 channel in my Pri-group are
> already configured, why all  calls get dropped with cause of
> non availability of the resources, Why not to use one of the available
> channels (1-16)
>
> Appreciate your help
>
> here is below the output of debug q931 for one of my outgoing calls:
>
>
>
> *SDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x000F *
> *Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 *
> *Standard = CCITT *
> *Transfer Capability = Speech  *
> *Transfer Mode = Circuit *
> *Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s *
> *Channel ID i = 0xA98390 *
> *Exclusive, Channel 16 *
> *Display i = 'HQ PH1' *
> *Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '7772022001' *
> *Plan:ISDN, Type:National *
> *Called Party Number i = 0x81, '911' *
> *Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown*
> *ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref = 0x800F *
> *Cause i = 0x82AC1810 - Requested circuit/channel not available*
>
>
> ___ For more information
> regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
> www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Network side vs User side clocking !

[CCIEing]

Hi geeks :)

What is the difference between using Network side clocking and User Side
clocking.

Regarding the exam, do they ask us to use any one of the both
in particular ?

I saw practice question informing that the PRI circuit layer 2 should be
user side

where as it will be a network side clocking for layer 1

as for the last sentence (network site), I would assume that we will
use *network-clock- participate  wic
X*
*
*
*Waiting your valuable input *
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Outgoing Calls via T1 failed

[CCIEing]

Well, I configured the pri-timeslots 1-16, because I have no dsp to
configure all the 23 b-channels .


On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Edgar Feliz  wrote:

> Are you sure the PSTN router has 1-16 configured for that GW. I had a
> similar issue because I had forgotten what I had set on PSTN router with
> only 4 slots and configure my GW with 8.
>
> Edgar
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:52 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After configuring my HQ GW as MGCP, then configure my T1 to register with
>> cucm , I was govern by the lack of the DSP resources, which force me to
>> define only 16 channel out of the 23 on my pri-group under the T1
>> controller configuration  !!
>>
>> here is the config :
>>
>> controller T1 0/0/0
>> pri-group timeslots 1-16 service mgcp
>>
>> Then I faced a problem with my outgoing calls , the calls was dropping
>> due to the cause "*Requested circuit/channel not available*"
>>
>> My Question here, as there is 16 channel in my Pri-group are
>> already configured, why all  calls get dropped with cause of
>> non availability of the resources, Why not to use one of the available
>> channels (1-16)
>>
>> Appreciate your help
>>
>> here is below the output of debug q931 for one of my outgoing calls:
>>
>>
>>
>> *SDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x000F *
>> *Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 *
>> *Standard = CCITT *
>> *Transfer Capability = Speech  *
>> *Transfer Mode = Circuit *
>> *Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s *
>> *Channel ID i = 0xA98390 *
>> *Exclusive, Channel 16 *
>> *Display i = 'HQ PH1' *
>> *Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '7772022001' *
>> *Plan:ISDN, Type:National *
>> *Called Party Number i = 0x81, '911' *
>> *Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown*
>> *ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref = 0x800F *
>> *Cause i = 0x82AC1810 - Requested circuit/channel not available*
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Outgoing Calls via T1 failed

[CCIEing]

Dears,

Thanks for your input , I'll try the suggested and let you know..

but do you think changing the value of the Service Parameters --> CCM-->
change B-channale status to => s0/su0/...@ VGname
=. affect my configuration ?


Regards


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Justin Carney wrote:

> Your debug output has a few clues...but I can't recall offhand if "channel
> 16" in that debug starts at 1 (meaning this is the 16th channel) or 0
> (meaning this is the 17th channel).  Do inbound calls from pstn work? If
> yes, its more likely the second option.
>
> In the first case, it would appear your issue is on the pstn side.  Run
> "show ISDN status" and layer 2 should show "multiple frame established" and
> layer 3 should show "ccm-manager" (or similar).  If however layer 2 shows
> "tei assigned" try the following:
>
> Mgcp bind media source lo0
> Mgcp bind control source lo0
> (Paste those commands twice)
> Int s0/0/0
>   No ISDN bind-l3 ccm
>   ISDN bind-l3 ccm
> No mgcp
> Mgcp
>
> Show ISDN status
> (Ensure you see multi frame established)
>
> Also type "show ccm" and ensure the gw is registered to your cucm.  If
> not, make sure that your hostname on the router matches what you have in
> cucm.  If you have "IP domain-name ipexpert.com" in your config then you
> need to use the fqdn in cucm, such as "r3.ipexpert.com."  however if you
> don't have a domain name on the router then you should just have the
> routers hostname w/o domain such as "r3."
>
> Now, for the other situation if channel 16 in the debug is really channel
> 17, that could be caused by using the "ccm config" command.  With this,
> every time in cucm you reset the mgcp gw it will apply a "no mgcp" then
> "mgcp" and download the config from cucm to the router (and configure a
> FULL PRI).  Ccm config command doesn't work with a fractional PRI, but you
> could use it to download all the commands, then "no ccm config" and change
> the controller commands to use timeslots 1-16 rather than 1-24.  (Need to
> shut voice port, shut int s0/0/0 and no ISDN bind-l3 ccm, shut controller
> and remove timeslots command, then apply commands in reverse order using
> fractional timeslots).
>
> Not a solution, but just for reference, the default channel order for mgcp
> PRI is bottom up.  If your issue is the latter (ccm config downloaded a
> full PRI config) and you were set to use ascending channels you would not
> have seen this issue until the 17th call came from pstn...in real lab you
> would lose points for having a full PRI I stead of fractional, even if
> calls did work.  The point here is make sure you remove "ccm config" if you
> have a fractional PRI.
>
> Hope this helps...
>
> Justin
>  On Mar 22, 2013 7:36 PM, "Bill"  wrote:
>
>> Is your gateway registered in CUCM?
>>
>> Are you getting the proper output of your show commands?  Show isdn
>> status, show ccm
>>
>> Do you have
>>
>> int seri x/x/x
>> Isdn bind-l3 ccm
>>
>> Did you try no MGCP MGCP?
>>
>> Can you post more of your config?
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2013, at 4:52 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After configuring my HQ GW as MGCP, then configure my T1 to register with
>> cucm , I was govern by the lack of the DSP resources, which force me to
>> define only 16 channel out of the 23 on my pri-group under the T1
>> controller configuration   !!
>>
>> here is the config :
>>
>> controller T1 0/0/0
>> pri-group timeslots 1-16 service mgcp
>>
>> Then I faced a problem with my outgoing calls , the calls was dropping
>> due to the cause "*Requested circuit/channel not available*"
>>
>> My Question here, as there is 16 channel in my Pri-group are
>> already configured, why all  calls get dropped with cause of
>> non availability of the resources, Why not to use one of the available
>> channels (1-16)
>>
>> Appreciate your help
>>
>> here is below the output of debug q931 for one of my outgoing calls:
>>
>>
>>
>> *SDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x000F *
>> *Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 *
>> *Standard = CCITT *
>> *Transfer Capability = Speech  *
>> *Transfer Mode = Circuit *
>> *Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s *
>> *Channel ID i = 0xA98390 *
>> *   

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Outgoing Calls via T1 failed

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

After configuring my HQ GW as MGCP, then configure my T1 to register with
cucm , I was govern by the lack of the DSP resources, which force me to
define only 16 channel out of the 23 on my pri-group under the T1
controller configuration  !!

here is the config :

controller T1 0/0/0
pri-group timeslots 1-16 service mgcp

Then I faced a problem with my outgoing calls , the calls was dropping due
to the cause "*Requested circuit/channel not available*"

My Question here, as there is 16 channel in my Pri-group are
already configured, why all  calls get dropped with cause of
non availability of the resources, Why not to use one of the available
channels (1-16)

Appreciate your help

here is below the output of debug q931 for one of my outgoing calls:



*SDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x000F *
*Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 *
*Standard = CCITT *
*Transfer Capability = Speech  *
*Transfer Mode = Circuit *
*Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s *
*Channel ID i = 0xA98390 *
*Exclusive, Channel 16 *
*Display i = 'HQ PH1' *
*Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '7772022001' *
*Plan:ISDN, Type:National *
*Called Party Number i = 0x81, '911' *
*Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown*
*ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref = 0x800F *
*Cause i = 0x82AC1810 - Requested circuit/channel not available*
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Interface won't to be bind with ccm-manager

[CCIEing]

Dears,

The problem was with this command :

controller e1 0/0/0
pri-group timeslots 1-12

where it should be

controller e1 0/0/0
pri-group timeslots 1-12 service mgcp

Thanks

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:57 PM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Hi experts,
>
> I am trying to configure Branch2-R3 as MGCP VG, and I configured an
> interface E1.
>
> I have problem when try to bind-l3 in  the serial interface s0/0/0:15 with
>  ccm-manager , the only option appear is q931???
>
>
> the gateway won't to register with ccm..
>
> any idea ???
>
> Appreciate your help!
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Interface won't to be bind with ccm-manager

[CCIEing]

Hi experts,

I am trying to configure Branch2-R3 as MGCP VG, and I configured an
interface E1.

I have problem when try to bind-l3 in  the serial interface s0/0/0:15 with
 ccm-manager , the only option appear is q931???


the gateway won't to register with ccm..

any idea ???

Appreciate your help!
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Number not appear when call PSTN

[CCIEing]

Hello Experts,,

Does any one of you encountered the following problem  :

I have MGCP gateway registered with CUCM 8.6, the GW have a FXO card
installed and analog line connected to that FXO.. when I try to call any
PSTN number the calling ID for my analog line that is connected to the FXO
does not appear to the PSTN user (e.x: mobile user), there is not special
service on the analog line to prevent the calling number..


Any Idea!!!
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg

[CCIEing]

Hi Bill,

The call is in type of national, I already applied the prefix , but it seems I 
did not issue the no mgcp/mgcp. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 15, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Bill  wrote:

> So the number comes in a MGCP GW and you want to change it from 555-1234 to 
> 9555-1234 is that correct?
> 
> If so, then use debug isdn q931 to verify the incoming numbers ANI and isdn 
> type.  If it is say local/isdn then under the GW page drill down near the 
> bottom and prefix a 9 to the local incoming numbers.  
> 
> If not please post the isdn debug and the desired goal and remember this is a 
> global change and will happen to all calls arriving with isdn and local in 
> bound.
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Mar 15, 2013, at 2:16 AM, Ahmad Gmail  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> All what i need is to show the calling number on the missed call list, but 
>> it is not working !!!
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Mar 15, 2013, at 1:20 AM, sethuvign...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Ahmad, 
>>> 
>>> You are trying to globalise but to reflect on the phones you have to do 
>>> localizations as well.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vignesh
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone
>>> 
>>> From: Ahmad Gmail ; 
>>> To: CCIE Study ; 
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg 
>>> Sent: Thu, Mar 14, 2013 7:14:19 PM 
>>> 
>>> Dears, 
>>> 
>>> I have a 2 Gw's each one with E1 PRI, they are grouped by RL.
>>> 
>>> I am trying to globalizing the incoming numbers (which is send by pstn an 
>>> type: national ) by adding the digit (9) as prefix. But the 9 is not 
>>> showing at all in the directory (missed/placed/received) 
>>> 
>>> Any idea !!
>>> 
>>> Appreciated 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> 
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg

[CCIEing]

Ya actually I am not on site now.. I will try it and let you all know ..

Thanks so much for your input ..

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Chrysostomos Christofi <
ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:

>  Hi
>
> ** **
>
> ok I see
>
> ** **
>
> **1)  **Go to VG configuration. *Incoming calling Party National
> Number prefix*  and add 9 there
>
> **2)  **Issue no mgcp , mgcp .Then dial again and you should see in
> the directory 9 in front of national calls
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Regards
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* CCIEing [mailto:aboaz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 15 March 2013 11:04
>
> *To:* Chrysostomos Christofi
> *Cc:* Jamie Parr (jamparr); CCIE Study
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
> ** **
>
> The GW is MGCP , and should work from the CUCM side.. 
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Chrysostomos Christofi <
> ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:
>
> I mean into VG with translation rule and not in  CUCM
>
> Is any reason that you need it in cucm?
>
> *From:* CCIEing [mailto:aboaz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 15 March 2013 11:00
> *To:* Chrysostomos Christofi
> *Cc:* Jamie Parr (jamparr); CCIE Study
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
>  
>
> Man I did it, under GW --> *Incoming Calling Party Settings..*
>
>  
>
> *But it did not work :(*
>
> *!!!*
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chrysostomos Christofi <
> ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:
>
> Why you don’t apply the 9 for calling numbers in the gw/?
>
>  
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *CCIEing
> *Sent:* 15 March 2013 10:49
> *To:* Jamie Parr (jamparr)
> *Cc:* CCIE Study
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
>  
>
> Hi Jamie, 
>
> Ya you are right regarding the globalize , But I may express in wrong
> words..
>
>  
>
> What I need is to add 9 for the calling numbers that appear on the Missed
> calls ..I am putting the 9 under the I*ncoming Calling Party Settings* .
> But this digit is not appear on the missed calls..
>
>  
>
> Appreciate your help all
>
>  
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) 
> wrote:
>
> Adding 9 to the incoming number is not globalizing, you need to convert
> the number to the full E.164 number to globalize
>
> Jamie Parr
> Engineer - IT
> jamp...@cisco.com
> Phone: +44 20 8824 2641
> Mobile: +44 7590622049
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ahmad Gmail
> Sent: 14 March 2013 19:14
> To: CCIE Study
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
> Dears,
>
> I have a 2 Gw's each one with E1 PRI, they are grouped by RL.
>
> I am trying to globalizing the incoming numbers (which is send by pstn an
> type: national ) by adding the digit (9) as prefix. But the 9 is not
> showing at all in the directory (missed/placed/received)
>
> Any idea !!
>
> Appreciated
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>  
>
>  
>
> ** **
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg

[CCIEing]

The GW is MGCP , and should work from the CUCM side..

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Chrysostomos Christofi <
ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:

>  I mean into VG with translation rule and not in  CUCM
>
> Is any reason that you need it in cucm?****
>
> *From:* CCIEing [mailto:aboaz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 15 March 2013 11:00
> *To:* Chrysostomos Christofi
> *Cc:* Jamie Parr (jamparr); CCIE Study
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
> ** **
>
> Man I did it, under GW --> *Incoming Calling Party Settings..*
>
> ** **
>
> *But it did not work :(*
>
> *!!!*
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chrysostomos Christofi <
> ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:
>
> Why you don’t apply the 9 for calling numbers in the gw/?
>
>  
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *CCIEing
> *Sent:* 15 March 2013 10:49
> *To:* Jamie Parr (jamparr)
> *Cc:* CCIE Study
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
>  
>
> Hi Jamie, 
>
> Ya you are right regarding the globalize , But I may express in wrong
> words..
>
>  
>
> What I need is to add 9 for the calling numbers that appear on the Missed
> calls ..I am putting the 9 under the I*ncoming Calling Party Settings* .
> But this digit is not appear on the missed calls..
>
>  
>
> Appreciate your help all
>
>  
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) 
> wrote:
>
> Adding 9 to the incoming number is not globalizing, you need to convert
> the number to the full E.164 number to globalize
>
> Jamie Parr
> Engineer - IT
> jamp...@cisco.com
> Phone: +44 20 8824 2641
> Mobile: +44 7590622049
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ahmad Gmail
> Sent: 14 March 2013 19:14
> To: CCIE Study
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
> Dears,
>
> I have a 2 Gw's each one with E1 PRI, they are grouped by RL.
>
> I am trying to globalizing the incoming numbers (which is send by pstn an
> type: national ) by adding the digit (9) as prefix. But the 9 is not
> showing at all in the directory (missed/placed/received)
>
> Any idea !!
>
> Appreciated
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>  
>
> ** **
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg

[CCIEing]

Man I did it, under GW --> Incoming Calling Party Settings..
*
*
*But it did not work :(*
*!!!
*
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chrysostomos Christofi <
ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:

>  Why you don’t apply the 9 for calling numbers in the gw/?
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *CCIEing
> *Sent:* 15 March 2013 10:49
> *To:* Jamie Parr (jamparr)
> *Cc:* CCIE Study
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Jamie, 
>
> Ya you are right regarding the globalize , But I may express in wrong
> words..
>
> ** **
>
> What I need is to add 9 for the calling numbers that appear on the Missed
> calls ..I am putting the 9 under the I*ncoming Calling Party Settings* .
> But this digit is not appear on the missed calls..
>
> ** **
>
> Appreciate your help all
>
> ** **
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) 
> wrote:
>
> Adding 9 to the incoming number is not globalizing, you need to convert
> the number to the full E.164 number to globalize
>
> Jamie Parr
> Engineer - IT
> jamp...@cisco.com
> Phone: +44 20 8824 2641
> Mobile: +44 7590622049
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ahmad Gmail
> Sent: 14 March 2013 19:14
> To: CCIE Study
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
> Dears,
>
> I have a 2 Gw's each one with E1 PRI, they are grouped by RL.
>
> I am trying to globalizing the incoming numbers (which is send by pstn an
> type: national ) by adding the digit (9) as prefix. But the 9 is not
> showing at all in the directory (missed/placed/received)
>
> Any idea !!
>
> Appreciated
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> ** **
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg

[CCIEing]

Hi Jamie,
Ya you are right regarding the globalize , But I may express in wrong
words..

What I need is to add 9 for the calling numbers that appear on the Missed
calls ..I am putting the 9 under the Incoming Calling Party Settings . But
this digit is not appear on the missed calls..

Appreciate your help all

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) wrote:

> Adding 9 to the incoming number is not globalizing, you need to convert
> the number to the full E.164 number to globalize
>
> Jamie Parr
> Engineer - IT
> jamp...@cisco.com
> Phone: +44 20 8824 2641
> Mobile: +44 7590622049
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ahmad Gmail
> Sent: 14 March 2013 19:14
> To: CCIE Study
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Globalizing on mgcp vg
>
> Dears,
>
> I have a 2 Gw's each one with E1 PRI, they are grouped by RL.
>
> I am trying to globalizing the incoming numbers (which is send by pstn an
> type: national ) by adding the digit (9) as prefix. But the 9 is not
> showing at all in the directory (missed/placed/received)
>
> Any idea !!
>
> Appreciated
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Enable Multicast routing on Routers

[CCIEing]

Great Input Bell, appreciated

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:34 PM, William Bell  wrote:

> If you are asked to do multicast over the WAN then you need to:
>
> a. Consider CODEC. Likely, you will need to support G729 across the WAN
> and you will want to update the IPVMS, Regions/DP, etc. to facilitate that
>
> b. Enable ip multicast-routing on HQ and SiteB routers.
>
> c. Enable pim dense-mode on all layer 3 interfaces/hops between the CUCM,
> the Site B phones, and PSTN callers
>
> d. Provision mcast audio source, mcast on MOH server(s), mcast on MRGs.
>  On MOH Servers, ensure you have the proper hop count. In the IE lab v3.0
> topology, there should be 3 hops from CUCM servers and SiteB phones.
>
> e. Make sure you use ccm-manager music-on-hold on SiteB gateway to service
> the PSTN callers
>
> -Bill
> --
> William Bell
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> twitter: @ucguerrilla
>
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2013, at 3:52 PM, CCIEing wrote:
>
> Hi Friends..
>
> I have question on the MOH multicast, In case we have HQ and SiteB are
> connected to the same CUCM cluster, and we need to enable the the
> multicasting to be used with MOH.
>
> Which interfaces on both router should we enable the Multicast traffic ,
> and based on which criteria ??
>
> Cheers for all
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Enable Multicast routing on Routers

[CCIEing]

Hi Friends..

I have question on the MOH multicast, In case we have HQ and SiteB are
connected to the same CUCM cluster, and we need to enable the the
multicasting to be used with MOH.

Which interfaces on both router should we enable the Multicast traffic ,
and based on which criteria ??

Cheers for all
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice-card

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

I always has leak of understanding regarding the dspfarm command..some
times they use it with the no command under the voice-card x mode..

Can any one explain more about this command.. Why we use it and how to use
it in the correct way..

appreciate your input in advance

no dspfarm
dsp service dspfarm
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

[CCIEing]

Hi,

Thanks all, Got it

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Amp  wrote:

> Hey,
> I would hard code the preferences. Being that the default preference in
> canonical terms is 0, you could set the preference on the pub dial peer to
> preference 1, or you could set the sub dial-peer to preference 1 and the
> pub to preference 2. Either way, I would hard code it.
>
> Amp
>
>
>
> Quoting CCIEing :
>
>  I am sorry the below dial-peers should be :
>> dial-peer voice 2 voip
>> destination-pattern 12341$
>> session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
>> codec g711ulaw
>> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
>> no vad
>>
>> dial-peer voice 3 voip
>> destination-pattern 12341$
>> session target ipv4:Pub_IP_Address
>> codec g711ulaw
>> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
>> no vad
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:14 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>>
>>  Hi All,
>>>
>>> For site B let us say that the lab ask us to configure it as H323
>>> gateway,
>>> and the question mentioned that call have to go to SUB CUCM then to PUB,
>>> in that case we have to create the 2 voip dial peers pointing to sub and
>>> PUB as below :
>>>
>>> My question here , in order to make sure the preference of the 1st dial
>>> peer , do we have to hard coded the preference command in the dial-peers
>>> or
>>> the tag index of the dial peer will grantee that the sup dial peer will
>>> chosen 1st as it is tag is less than the pub dial-peer
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> dial-peer voice 2 voip
>>> destination-pattern 12341$
>>> session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
>>> codec g711ulaw
>>> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
>>> no vad
>>>
>>> dial-peer voice 2 voip
>>> destination-pattern 12341$
>>> session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
>>> codec g711ulaw
>>> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
>>> no vad
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

[CCIEing]

I am sorry the below dial-peers should be :
dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad

dial-peer voice 3 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Pub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad


On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:14 PM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> For site B let us say that the lab ask us to configure it as H323 gateway,
> and the question mentioned that call have to go to SUB CUCM then to PUB,
> in that case we have to create the 2 voip dial peers pointing to sub and
> PUB as below :
>
> My question here , in order to make sure the preference of the 1st dial
> peer , do we have to hard coded the preference command in the dial-peers or
> the tag index of the dial peer will grantee that the sup dial peer will
> chosen 1st as it is tag is less than the pub dial-peer
>
> Thanks
>
> dial-peer voice 2 voip
> destination-pattern 12341$
> session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
> codec g711ulaw
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
> no vad
>
> dial-peer voice 2 voip
> destination-pattern 12341$
> session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
> codec g711ulaw
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
> no vad
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

[CCIEing]

Hi All,

For site B let us say that the lab ask us to configure it as H323 gateway,
and the question mentioned that call have to go to SUB CUCM then to PUB,
in that case we have to create the 2 voip dial peers pointing to sub and
PUB as below :

My question here , in order to make sure the preference of the 1st dial
peer , do we have to hard coded the preference command in the dial-peers or
the tag index of the dial peer will grantee that the sup dial peer will
chosen 1st as it is tag is less than the pub dial-peer

Thanks

dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad

dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B Channel Busy Out

[CCIEing]

Hi Jason,

I have question about step # 9 clear counters

is it the normal clear counter command?
e.x:  E1 card
clear counter interface s x/y/z:15

Thanks

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Jason Lee  wrote:

> I use this as a strategy for checking my gateway configuration
>
> Ensure that your are meeting requirements on the following
>
>
>1. display-ie
>2. BCHAN order selection (Ascending, Descending)
>3. BCHAN number
>   1. How many BCHANs?
>  1. If not specified create a full PRI.
>  2. If fractional
> 1. Set BCHAN Maintenance in Advanced Service Parameters
> 2. Check the *Check Status *checkbox in GW config
>  4. Clocking
>   1. Network clock participate
>   2. network clock select 1 t10/0/0
>5. ISDN Switch-Type
>6. Source-Address
>7. 911
>   1. Done in gateway section.
>  1. Make sure to have routed correctly, SLRG?,
>   8. Direct Inward Dial
>9. clear counters
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) 
> wrote:
>
>>  I am also curious as to the grading on the gateways, I received very
>> low marks on this section. Can anyone help?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *Jamie Parr*
>> Engineer - IT
>> jamp...@cisco.com
>> Phone: *+44 20 8824 2641*
>> Mobile: *+44 7590622049*
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Pixar Perfect
>> *Sent:* 26 February 2013 19:35
>> *To:* Steve Keller; GARY CLARK
>> *Cc:* CCIE Voice OSL
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B Channel Busy Out
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Gary ..you mentioned B channel busyout on service parameter. in my
>> understanding this was only needed when you would "download" the GW config
>> from CCM i.e., ccm-manager config. it doesn't make any sense to use this
>> service parameter as most of the solution guides (INE, IPXEPERT, 360) do
>> not encourage the use of ccm-manager config except initial stage of your
>> config and then disable it. I have heard ppl who passed just using standard
>> configs but not sure if they did the B channel busy out on service
>> parameter. 
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> mgcp 
>>
>> mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 -->sub
>>
>> mgcp dtmf 
>>
>> mgcp bind ... (2x2)
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ccm-mana fall
>>
>> ccm-mana music
>>
>> ccm-mana mgcp
>>
>> ccm-mana red 10.10.210.10 --> pub
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> if B channel status is *really graded *on the exam then it is one of
>> those things that doesn't make sense to have it there but is needed to
>> score points [image: Emoji]
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> experts,
>>
>> any comments or advise from the recent Experts ?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> PIXAR
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>  --
>>
>> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:31:12 -0500
>> From: skeller...@gmail.com
>> To: garyclark...@gmail.com
>> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab>7 failed for 1%
>>
>> I recieved 29% in RTP on GW Signalling section and Call Routing as well.
>> I am very discouraged i could score very low marks on these sections as i
>> took my time and felt like i had nailed them. I scored really well in all
>> other areas but failed because of these 2 sections. It is a mystery to me
>> what the proctor is doing to arrive at that score, when all my calls
>> worked, the debugs matched the requirements, i was binding to the correct
>> interfaces, setting up the correct protocol and channels,etc. I would love
>> to hear what insight folks have as to why the scores could be so low when
>> everything looked to be working beautifully, without breaking NDA of course.
>> 
>>
>>  
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> steve
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, GARY CLARK 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi friends,
>>
>> I got lab 7 in SJC and i completed that in 6 hrs and tested for 2 hrs
>> time.
>>
>> I thought i have passed 1000% but when i saw my result i was surprised.**
>> **
>>
>> I almost got everywhere 100% except VG / 29% which was 17 marks section.*
>> ***
>>
>> Same story with my friends do anyone got 100% in VG for lab 7 
>>
>> If anyone interested to share the hidden secrets then welcome as people
>> are getting lab 7 repeating now very eager to understand what could be
>> wrong.
>>
>> Please email me for further discussion.
>>
>> We 3 friends attempted out of which i also did busy out channel but that
>> also did not helped its 29% only why so 
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ___ For more information
>> regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to know ISDN Switch Type?

[CCIEing]

Got it,

Thanks guys..



On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Chrysostomos Christofi <
ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:

>  Hi
>
> ** **
>
> It should say the question:
>
> Set this site with T1 controller , then the isdn switch type is* isdn
> switch-type primary-ni*
>
> If the question say this site has E1 controller then the isdn switch type
> is *isdn switch-type primary-net5*
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *CCIEing
> *Sent:* Παρασκευή, 8 Μαρτίου 2013 4:31 μμ
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to know ISDN Switch Type?
>
> ** **
>
> Hi all,
>
> ** **
>
> When it comes to the configuration of the T1/E1, how we can know the isdn
> switch type that must be used ?
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks in advance 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to know ISDN Switch Type?

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

When it comes to the configuration of the T1/E1, how we can know the isdn
switch type that must be used ?


Thanks in advance
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone NTP Reference Vs NTP Reference

[CCIEing]

Oh thanks a lot for your input.

Appreciated ..


On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Cory Gray wrote:

> Phone ntp reference is for SIP phones only
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:42 PM, "CCIEing"  wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > The following question cross my mind while doing the NTP configuration
> stuff..
> >
> > What is the difference between the Phone NTP reference configuration in
> the CCM Web administration page
> > and
> > The NTP reference on the OS Administration page??
> >
> > does the 1st one for the endpoints where the 2nd one is for the CUCM
> itself?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone NTP Reference Vs NTP Reference

[CCIEing]

Hello All,

The following question cross my mind while doing the NTP configuration
stuff..

What is the difference between the Phone NTP reference configuration in the
CCM Web administration page
and
The NTP reference on the OS Administration page??

does the 1st one for the endpoints where the 2nd one is for the CUCM itself?

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Rack Rental

[CCIEing]

Hi All,

I need to know if anyone has information about the IPexpert  rack rental, I
bought a sessions from IpExpert site, but now i am not able to find where
to schedule my sessions?

appreciate your help guys.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Phone Agent

[CCIEing]

Finally it worked :)  woow..

It seems changing the IP address of the server made all these problems, I
do some regedit update to reflect the new IP address change, then restart
the server, and things went in the correct direction .

Thanks all for your input.



On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:53 PM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Not forget to mention that I have changed the IP address of the server
> using ! Is that related to my problem..
>
> Appreciate your help, as this issue take a lot of my time :(
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:12 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>
>> I want to add the following information:
>>
>> These 2 services are not able to start:
>>
>> Cisco Desktop LDAP Monitor Service
>> Cisco Desktop Sync Service
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:57 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>>
>>> Yes Man,
>>>
>>> I restarted it, the same error still occurs !!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja <
>>> tycoononway1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Man,
>>>>
>>>> Tried restarting the BIPPA service from CCX yet?
>>>>
>>>> - G
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:28 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am suffering the "*Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service*"
>>>>> error, when try to browse the url
>>>>> "*
>>>>> http://uccx_IP_address:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp
>>>>> *"  
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not able to continue the configuration of the IP Phone agent.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have changed the Ip address of the UCCX, does this affect ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The full output of when try to the url above is :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> -
>>>>> Error
>>>>> Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service.
>>>>> -
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK
>>>>> Key:Services
>>>>> 1
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> any idea??
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Phone Agent

[CCIEing]

Not forget to mention that I have changed the IP address of the server
using ! Is that related to my problem..

Appreciate your help, as this issue take a lot of my time :(





On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:12 PM, CCIEing  wrote:

> I want to add the following information:
>
> These 2 services are not able to start:
>
> Cisco Desktop LDAP Monitor Service
> Cisco Desktop Sync Service
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:57 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>
>> Yes Man,
>>
>> I restarted it, the same error still occurs !!!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja <
>> tycoononway1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Man,
>>>
>>> Tried restarting the BIPPA service from CCX yet?
>>>
>>> - G
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:28 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I am suffering the "*Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service*"
>>>> error, when try to browse the url
>>>> "*
>>>> http://uccx_IP_address:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp*";
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> I am not able to continue the configuration of the IP Phone agent.
>>>>
>>>> I have changed the Ip address of the UCCX, does this affect ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The full output of when try to the url above is :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> -
>>>> Error
>>>> Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service.
>>>> -
>>>> 
>>>> OK
>>>> Key:Services
>>>> 1
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> any idea??
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>>
>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Phone Agent

[CCIEing]

I want to add the following information:

These 2 services are not able to start:

Cisco Desktop LDAP Monitor Service
Cisco Desktop Sync Service



On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:57 PM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Yes Man,
>
> I restarted it, the same error still occurs !!!
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja <
> tycoononway1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Man,
>>
>> Tried restarting the BIPPA service from CCX yet?
>>
>> - G
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:28 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I am suffering the "*Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service*"
>>> error, when try to browse the url
>>> "*http://uccx_IP_address:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp
>>> *"  
>>>
>>> I am not able to continue the configuration of the IP Phone agent.
>>>
>>> I have changed the Ip address of the UCCX, does this affect ?
>>>
>>>
>>> The full output of when try to the url above is :
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> -
>>> Error
>>> Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service.
>>> -
>>> 
>>> OK
>>> Key:Services
>>> 1
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> any idea??
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Phone Agent

[CCIEing]

Yes Man,

I restarted it, the same error still occurs !!!



On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja <
tycoononway1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Man,
>
> Tried restarting the BIPPA service from CCX yet?
>
> - G
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:28 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am suffering the "*Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service*"
>> error, when try to browse the url
>> "*http://uccx_IP_address:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp*";
>>  
>>
>> I am not able to continue the configuration of the IP Phone agent.
>>
>> I have changed the Ip address of the UCCX, does this affect ?
>>
>>
>> The full output of when try to the url above is :
>>
>>
>> 
>> -
>> Error
>> Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service.
>> -
>> 
>> OK
>> Key:Services
>> 1
>> 
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> any idea??
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Phone Agent

[CCIEing]

I used the same URL, with the same error appear !



On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Bill Lake  wrote:

> go here, get correct IP agent http at the number 5 down the page.  It is bold
> even so easy to find
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/custcosw/ps1846/products_tech_note09186a008029e6d5.shtml
>
> Here is the link you want to use to setup IPPA
>
> *http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx:/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentLogin.jsp
>
>
>
> *
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am suffering the "*Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service*"
>> error, when try to browse the url
>> "*http://uccx_IP_address:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp*";
>>  
>>
>> I am not able to continue the configuration of the IP Phone agent.
>>
>> I have changed the Ip address of the UCCX, does this affect ?
>>
>>
>> The full output of when try to the url above is :
>>
>>
>> 
>> -
>> Error
>> Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service.
>> -
>> 
>> OK
>> Key:Services
>> 1
>> 
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> any idea??
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Phone Agent

[CCIEing]

Hi All,

I am suffering the "*Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service*" error,
when try to browse the url
"*http://uccx_IP_address:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp*";
 

I am not able to continue the configuration of the IP Phone agent.

I have changed the Ip address of the UCCX, does this affect ?


The full output of when try to the url above is :



-
Error
Cannot connect to the IP Phone Agent service.
-

OK
Key:Services
1





any idea??

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Add CUC as Application Server

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

How much (important and mandatory) is adding the CUC or CUPS to the CUCM as
Application Server?


thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Configuriong Conferance that used with LiveRecord in CUE

[CCIEing]

Hello Guys,

The following question passed my mind while I am practicing the LiveRecord
feature under the CUE topic.

What type of conference should we used for the purpose  of configuring the
Liverecord under CUE task, is it the

   - Ad-hoc conference  , just like below configuration example :

Ephone-dn 1 dual-line
Number A101
Conference Ad-hoc
!
Ephone-dn 2 dual-line
Number A101
Conference Ad-hoc
!
Ephone-dn 3 dual-line
Number A101
Conference Ad-hoc
!
Ephone-dn 4 dual-line
Number A101
Conference Ad-hoc

   OR


   Use the


   - Hardware conference bridge

and based on which conditions shall we chose between the above two options .

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cisco DocCD

[CCIEing]

Here we go, I found what I need under this path :

Product >> Voice and UC >> IP Telephony >> Unified Messaging >> CUC
>> Maintain and Operate (left panel ) >> Maintain and Operate Guides
>> System Administration Guide for Cisco Unity Connection Release 7.x  >>
and finally *Setting Up Phone View*
*
*
Thanks everyone :)
*
*
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Suresh Bhandari  wrote:

> And the SysAdmin guide can be found following
> Products>Voice and UC>IP Telephony>Unified Messaging>CUC>Configure (left
> pane links)>Configuration Guides>
> CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU WANT? Check the Documentation Guide DG for CUC 7.x
>
> And you are there with most, if not all, of the links for the version
> selected.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Cory Gray wrote:
>
>> The doc cd was retired from the lab many years ago.  It is now the
>> support pages with the three windows for you to navigate through.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:18 AM, "CCIEing"  wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was practicing the cisco Documentation CD that will be available during
>> the lab http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html
>> to get used on it, I was searching for the topic in unity connection "How
>> to set up the Phone View" ,this topic is mentioned in the System
>> Administration for Cisco Unity Connection Release 7.X (
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/administration/guide/7xcucsag245.html
>> )
>> I was not able to find the path in the Doc CD, I used Google to fine this
>> guide from cisco site.
>>
>> Do you guys practice the Doc CD - If not, then you have to, as this is
>> the only documentation resource during the exam..-,
>>
>> do you know the Path to the system administration guide for the products.
>>
>> Awaiting your response, Appreciate that.
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Suresh Bhandari
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cisco DocCD

[CCIEing]

Hi All,

I was practicing the cisco Documentation CD that will be available during
the lab http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html
to get used on it, I was searching for the topic in unity connection "How
to set up the Phone View" ,this topic is mentioned in the System
Administration for Cisco Unity Connection Release 7.X (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/administration/guide/7xcucsag245.html
)
I was not able to find the path in the Doc CD, I used Google to fine this
guide from cisco site.

Do you guys practice the Doc CD - If not, then you have to, as this is the
only documentation resource during the exam..-,

do you know the Path to the system administration guide for the products.

Awaiting your response, Appreciate that.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Tab on the LAB exam

[CCIEing]

So, What type of MWI is better to use ??

outcalling , unsolicited , or sub-notify ??

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:58 AM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Oh thanks a lot guys ..
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja <
> tycoononway1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yup
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:26 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Friends,
>>>
>>> I have a small question about the exam, does the Tab (to complete
>>> commands ) in the routers CLI is enabled ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Tab on the LAB exam

[CCIEing]

Oh thanks a lot guys ..



On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja <
tycoononway1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yup
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:26 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>
>> Hello Friends,
>>
>> I have a small question about the exam, does the Tab (to complete
>> commands ) in the routers CLI is enabled ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Tab on the LAB exam

[CCIEing]

Hello Friends,

I have a small question about the exam, does the Tab (to complete commands
) in the routers CLI is enabled ?

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MWI off for broadcast message is not working.

[CCIEing]

Guys Seems that I am asking, then I can find an answer to my questions, :)

I find the following cisco document :
*
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/design/design21/cuevmdes.html#wp1008620
*

Which says clearly that "WI operation for broadcast messaging cannot be
controlled per individual mailbox, it is an attribute of the system on
which the message is delivered. If MWI for broadcast messaging is
configured to be on, the MWI light is lit for all mailboxes on the system
when a broadcast message becomes active. MWI is *refreshed when a broadcast
message expires* so that any mailboxes that have not listened to the
message will never receive it and the MWI state is turned off (unless there
are other new messages in the mailbox)."



On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:02 AM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I configured a user in the CUE to send broadcast message, he is able to
> send the message, the MWI ON appear on the phone, but when recipient hear
> the broadcast message and the message deleted, the red alarm and the
> envelop does not disappear , the MWI OFF is not working, until I perform
> the mwi refresh comman from  CUE CLI.
>
>
> Any help please.
> Thanks
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MWI off for broadcast message is not working.

[CCIEing]

Hi All,

I configured a user in the CUE to send broadcast message, he is able to
send the message, the MWI ON appear on the phone, but when recipient hear
the broadcast message and the message deleted, the red alarm and the
envelop does not disappear , the MWI OFF is not working, until I perform
the mwi refresh comman from  CUE CLI.


Any help please.
Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE CLI configuration

[CCIEing]

Hello Again guys,

Return to CUE configuration using CLI  .
So practicing CLI Imposes on us to know all the parameters for all
applications, but there are a lot of parameters "like
the autoattendant app", right?

is there any way to remember them from inside the cli cue help, does any
one have a difficulty to learn them .

Appreciate your cooperation

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Chrysostomos Christofi <
ch.christ...@logicom.net> wrote:

>  Sorry
>
> ** **
>
> Apologize wrong type
>
> ** **
>
> Correction:
>
> I heard from a lot guys that they had  troubles to access the cue through
> gui J
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Chrysostomos
> Christofi
> *Sent:* Παρασκευή, 4 Ιανουαρίου 2013 1:09 μμ
> *To:* Ahmad Taamneh; William Bell
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE CLI configuration
>
> ** **
>
> I heard from a lot guys that they had  troubles to access the cue through
> cli
>
> So we have to learn both ways
>
> ** **
>
> Also its more fast with cli either with cme or cucm integration
>
> ** **
>
> Regards
>
> Chrysostomos
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Ahmad Taamneh
> *Sent:* Παρασκευή, 4 Ιανουαρίου 2013 12:54 μμ
> *To:* William Bell
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE CLI configuration
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks Bell,
>
> Appreciate your valuable opinion , ya you are right regarding CUE-CME, i
> will be much faster to use CLI,
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:51 AM, "William Bell"  wrote:**
> **
>
>  I suppose they could but I'd actually expect they wouldn't force you to
> use one or the other. The advice I see others give in this forum is to make
> sure you know how to do both. Usually that advice is followed with a
> "...besides, the CLI is much faster". Using the CLI is faster, at least for
> the CUE-CME integration. I haven't attempted it for CUE-CUCM. 
>
> ** **
>
> But that isn't your question. The generic answer is they could require you
> to use the CLI. My opinion is that would be quite lame if they did. There
> are plenty of ways to screw with you and restricting you from using the GUI
> on CUE seems petty. Just my opinion. That said, I am practicing both and
> will use the one that is fastest and the one I am most comfortable with
> under a time pressure.
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> -Bill
>
> ** **
>
> William Bell
>
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
>
> twitter: @ucguerrilla
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:26 PM, CCIEing wrote:
>
> ** **
>
> Hi All,
>
> ** **
>
> I have a question regarding the required method to configure CUE, during
> the lab exam, can the ask us to configure the CUE using only command Line?
> and not using the GUI at all.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks
>
> ** **
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> ** **
>
>  ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE CLI configuration

[CCIEing]

Hi All,

I have a question regarding the required method to configure CUE, during
the lab exam, can the ask us to configure the CUE using only command Line?
and not using the GUI at all.

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE with CME integration

[CCIEing]

Hello All,
At first Happy new your to all of you, wish you a pass attempt .

Regarding this topic I opened a PDI case, they answered me with the
following :

" *it is mandatory to house CME & CUE in the same router.*
*
*
*You might want to first try installing the CME module along with CME in
same ISR & let me know in case of any further issues*. "

Thanks

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:05 AM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I am integrating CUE with CME, When I run the initialization  Wizard , the
> system keep giving me the following message
> "Login to Call Manager Express as Administrator Failed. Check your Call
> Manager Express Configuration"
>
> I am using a Call Manager Express not on box with the CUE module, it is on
> other router, the Telephony-Service Configuration that is related to the
> username and password is here below :
>
>  *telephony-service*
> * max-ephones 10*
> * max-dn 10*
> * ip source-address 192.168.35.1 port 2000*
> * system message CME as SRST*
> * time-zone 31*
> * keepalive 10*
> * max-conferences 8 gain -6*
> * web admin system name admin password cisco *
> *
> *
> My Questions Here:
>
> 1- Is it mandatory for CUE to be in the same router with CME?
> 2- Why this this message continue appear, I Put the correct information
> about the Web user name and Passwor.
>
> Appreciate your help.
>
> Thanks
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE with CME integration

[CCIEing]

Dear All,

I am integrating CUE with CME, When I run the initialization  Wizard , the
system keep giving me the following message
"Login to Call Manager Express as Administrator Failed. Check your Call
Manager Express Configuration"

I am using a Call Manager Express not on box with the CUE module, it is on
other router, the Telephony-Service Configuration that is related to the
username and password is here below :

*telephony-service*
* max-ephones 10*
* max-dn 10*
* ip source-address 192.168.35.1 port 2000*
* system message CME as SRST*
* time-zone 31*
* keepalive 10*
* max-conferences 8 gain -6*
* web admin system name admin password cisco *
*
*
My Questions Here:

1- Is it mandatory for CUE to be in the same router with CME?
2- Why this this message continue appear, I Put the correct information
about the Web user name and Passwor.

Appreciate your help.

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Unity Connection - VM pilot and VM profile made default but not applied automatically on phones

[CCIEing]

Hi virajith,

You may update all your phone settings using bulk edit.

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:36 PM, virajith  wrote:

> hi All,
>
> I am noticing that for my cisco unity connection integrated  with CUCM  -
> the VM pilot and profile that I have made as default VM pilot and profile
> is not getting automatically applied on my phones and therefore any call
> forward busy or no answer gets a busy tone.
>
> I have to manually update the VM profile on the DN level of the phone to
> indicate that the default
> is the unity connection.
>
> How do I correct this behaviour so that the phones automatically can get
> the default VM settings without me having to specify it?
>
> -Vir
>
>
> 
> Catch India as it happens with the *Rediff News App*. To download it for
> FREE, click 
> here
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Terminal used for lab is putty or CRT or any other terminal

[CCIEing]

Dears,

I hear both could be user  Putty, SecureCRT.



On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:24 PM, singh  wrote:

>
> hi Guys,
>
> I am interesting in knowning the following ...
>
> 1) From the CCIE voice lab which is the terminal connnection used ( putty
> or crt)?
>
> 2)Is it ssh or telnet?
>
>
> -singh
>
>
> Get Yourself a cool, short *@in.com* Email ID 
> now!
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE integration With CUCM

[CCIEing]

Dear All,

It seems it is a compatibility issue, I am using CUCM 8, and based on the
CUE 7.X compatibility matrix
 " *
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/compatibility/cuecomp.htm#CUCM
* "

it is not compatible :(.

Thanks All again for your time

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:03 PM, CCIEing  wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I did the configuration of the CUE - CUCM integration, I was able to
> import the users from cucm, also the CTI Ports are registered with the
> CUCM, more over I went through the initialization wizard for the CUE, the
> voice mail pilot, profile already configured and assigned to phones , the
> CUCM can ping botht the VG and CUE module and visa v.
>
> but when I try to call the voice mail pilot, or push the messages button I
> get this message on the phone "Can not reach the number".
>
> Any idea.
>
> Thanks in advance for your time .
> Ahmad
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE integration With CUCM

[CCIEing]

Dear All,

I did the configuration of the CUE - CUCM integration, I was able to import
the users from cucm, also the CTI Ports are registered with the CUCM, more
over I went through the initialization wizard for the CUE, the voice mail
pilot, profile already configured and assigned to phones , the CUCM can
ping botht the VG and CUE module and visa v.

but when I try to call the voice mail pilot, or push the messages button I
get this message on the phone "Can not reach the number".

Any idea.

Thanks in advance for your time .
Ahmad
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE with CUCM

[CCIEing]

Thanks All,

Do you have a good document -you already used-about this integration

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Bill Lake  wrote:

> You should be prepared to integrate cue with either CME or CUCM and you
> should be prepared to do any normal task and some extra ordinary tasks with
> it.
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:15 PM, CCIEing  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I want to make sure that the CUE integration with CUCM is included of the
>> LAB exam , right ?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection

[CCIEing]

Hi Abdullin,

I tried to delete the user then create it again in both methods Manually
and also imported, then changed the Display name to be 2001, and it worked
with me this time.

I think at -but not sure why it did not work-1st when I tested
the feature the user has some greeting setting, that why it did not work.


Any way thanks guys a lot for your response .
Ahamd

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Abdullin Kamil wrote:

> Hi,
> For this purpose it is necessary to bring manually the user to CUC,
> instead of to import users.
>
> 2012/12/26, CCIEing :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > is there any possibility to achieve the following :
> >
> > *When someone calls from PSTN to phone number 2001 (Br2 Phone1) it should
> > not say HQ PHONE 1 not available it should say*
> > *2001 is not available please leave your message after the tone*.
> >
> > modifying  the personal greetings is not allowed
> >
> > I tried to change the display name for this user to 2001, but it did not
> > work with me.
> >
> > Thanks in Advance.
> >
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection

[CCIEing]

Hi all,

is there any possibility to achieve the following :

*When someone calls from PSTN to phone number 2001 (Br2 Phone1) it should
not say HQ PHONE 1 not available it should say*
*2001 is not available please leave your message after the tone*.

modifying  the personal greetings is not allowed

I tried to change the display name for this user to 2001, but it did not
work with me.

Thanks in Advance.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection Call handler

[CCIEing]

Hi All,

a small question about the system call handlers, when you create a new
system call handler, do we have to stuck with time zone for HQ site? or
just leave it to Use System Default Time Zone.

Thanks in advance
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com