Re: [ccp4bb] BUSTER on CCP4 Cloud

2023-07-11 Thread Maria Fando - STFC UKRI
Dear Dave,

Thank you for the answer. There is only one way to first import phases in 
projects — using hop-on mode or task. Hop-on task can be run in existing 
projects but should be started from the top of the tree.  There is a way to 
replace already existing phases with Import & Replace task, but it's a 
different story.


Dear Shawn,

As Dave wrote. if your structure is already phased and built and you want to 
continue working in CCP4 Cloud you should use the hop-on task to import your 
data. In this case, you won't be needed to run ASU task. In case you are 
starting a new project you will need to get phase estimation first before 
running Buster.

Let me know if you still have issues.




Warm regards,
Maria Fando

CCP4 Core team
UKRI Science and Technology Facilities Council
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Harwell Campus
Didcot, Oxfordshire
OX11 0QX
UK





To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


Re: [ccp4bb] BUSTER on CCP4 Cloud

2023-07-10 Thread David Briggs
HI Shawn,

the asymmetric unit contents task tells Cloud how many copies of your model 
exist in the ASU, but not necessarily that they are in the correct position 
(think, prior to Molecular replacement - no phase information).

Depending upon where you are in your workflow, you can run a quick MR job, or 
start a new project with the "hop on" mode specifying an already partially 
refined structure.

I am certain you can do this within an existing project, (maybe by importing 
phases?) but I can't recall the right task to do this at the moment (in my 
defence it is still quite early here).

Perhaps someone else can help with that? (please reply to the list because I'd 
like to know as well!)

Best,

Dave



--

Dr David C. Briggs CSci MRSB (he/him)

Principal Laboratory Research Scientist

Signalling and Structural Biology Lab

The Francis Crick Institute

London, UK

Working hours: Mon-Fri 0900-1700

==

about.me/david_briggs<https://about.me/david_briggs> | 
OrcID<https://orcid.org/-0002-9793-7339> | Google Scholar 
<https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=DRKG5KwJ>


From: CCP4 bulletin board  on behalf of Shawn R 
<a7787de0adf6-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Sent: 09 July 2023 05:02
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK 
Subject: [ccp4bb] BUSTER on CCP4 Cloud


External Sender: Use caution.


Dear All,

I would like to run Buster refinement using CCP4 Cloud. However, the task says 
I am missing a structure revision. This is despite having generated the 
structure revision using the Asymmetric Unit Content task. I can see the output 
of AU Content task is the structure revision, so I am a little confused why it 
does not allow me to run the refinement. Perhaps I am missing some small detail?

Thanks for your thoughts!



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2FWA-JISC.exe%3FSUBED1%3DCCP4BB%26A%3D1=05%7C01%7C%7C1756a803ee7c42d8560308db80316d55%7C4eed7807ebad415aa7a99170947f4eae%7C0%7C1%7C638244722008953538%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=FPjAMXqUiVWivTD8KqirBywuzeLtcKiJCFF3l1Ll4uQ%3D=0<https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1>

This message was issued to members of 
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2FCCP4BB=05%7C01%7C%7C1756a803ee7c42d8560308db80316d55%7C4eed7807ebad415aa7a99170947f4eae%7C0%7C1%7C638244722008953538%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=Wk%2BWIoXGZgmzbiFk2nPzJD8Up%2BOEhQrhLj6I0QZVswU%3D=0<http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB>,
 a mailing list hosted by 
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2F=05%7C01%7C%7C1756a803ee7c42d8560308db80316d55%7C4eed7807ebad415aa7a99170947f4eae%7C0%7C1%7C638244722008953538%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=h3KN8TPBNBrduH2NJe2RbzgCHjFLXhg8peUtVnipni0%3D=0<http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/>,
 terms & conditions are available at 
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fpolicyandsecurity%2F=05%7C01%7C%7C1756a803ee7c42d8560308db80316d55%7C4eed7807ebad415aa7a99170947f4eae%7C0%7C1%7C638244722008953538%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=oqqthLf7d3lZSVrK9fVbhNkdL3S4E8YY5EGil0G6Dck%3D=0<https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/>

The Francis Crick Institute Limited is a registered charity in England and 
Wales no. 1140062 and a company registered in England and Wales no. 06885462, 
with its registered office at 1 Midland Road London NW1 1AT



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


[ccp4bb] BUSTER on CCP4 Cloud

2023-07-08 Thread Shawn R
Dear All,

I would like to run Buster refinement using CCP4 Cloud. However, the task says 
I am missing a structure revision. This is despite having generated the 
structure revision using the Asymmetric Unit Content task. I can see the output 
of AU Content task is the structure revision, so I am a little confused why it 
does not allow me to run the refinement. Perhaps I am missing some small detail?

Thanks for your thoughts!



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


Re: [ccp4bb] Buster

2011-05-27 Thread Gerard Bricogne
Dear Xavier,

 I am very sorry that I didn't respond instantly to your query about
this strange observation at the beginning of the month. After that, it was
sitting rather invisibly in my mailbox, given that its subject line said
Re: [ccp4bb] Dehydration treatments :-) .

 We are just about to release a new version of BUSTER in conjunction
with the final session of the ACA meeting. However, let us deal with your
question off-list, as it isn't related to ccp4.

 I will be in touch.
 
 
 With best wishes,
 
  Gerard.

--
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 04:57:04PM +0200, F.Xavier Gomis-Rüth wrote:
 Dear CCP4ers,
 I start apologizing for this off-topic question but I could not get an 
 answer knocking at other doors...
 We have installed version 1.6.0. from July 18,2009 of BUSTER, which 
 apparently has a slight problem:
 after each refinement step, I need to re-center the model within the new 
 electron density map.
 Is there any means to circumvent this ? Is there any newer version 
 available somewhere ?
 I could not find any indication in the web page of Global Phasing  but 
 think it is rather strange that there has been
 no release since almost two years.
 Thanks a lot in advance,
 Xavier
 -- 

-- 

 ===
 * *
 * Gerard Bricogne g...@globalphasing.com  *
 * *
 * Global Phasing Ltd. *
 * Sheraton House, Castle Park Tel: +44-(0)1223-353033 *
 * Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK   Fax: +44-(0)1223-366889 *
 * *
 ===


Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-29 Thread jacques-philippe colletier
Dear All

Thank you all a lot for your answers, and sorry for the trouble that my
question has generated.

Gerard B. : Thanks a lot to you and your colleagues for releasing, in the
forthcoming time, an OSX version of BUSTER-TNT.

Best from LA
Jacques



2008/10/28 Pete Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Gerard,

 Thank you very much for clearing that up.  It's always good to hear that
 there's one less things I need to worry about.

 Pete

 Gerard Bricogne wrote:
  Dear Pete,
 
   Thank you for your message. I can confirm that you need not worry
 about
  this clause: it is meant to prohibit the aggressive use of code
 decompilers
  with the intention of stealing the content of the source code. What you
 have
  described in your hypothetical example is nothing of the sort, but
 instead a
  very useful kind of comparative evaluation.
 
 
   With best wishes,
 
Gerard.
 
  --
  On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:53:19AM -0500, Pete Meyer wrote:
  Apologies for going slightly further off-topic...
 
  Last time I had a free half-day to look into sharp, I noticed that the
  academic license prohibits reverse-engineering.  This seemed to put any
  comparative testing into a slightly grey area.  For example, if I find
  that sharp does the best job refining sites, but bp3 outputs better
  phases for a dataset due to different representation of phase
  probabilities*, I've implicitly constructed a primitive model of how
  sharp is working.  This seems close enough to a first step of
  reverse-engineering that I was concerned.
 
  Could someone confirm that I'm worrying about things I don't need to
 here?
 
  Pete
 
  * Purely hypothetical example.
 
 



Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-28 Thread Kay Diederichs

Clemens Vonrhein schrieb:
...

A nice task would be to compare different integration/scaling packages
at various stages: for finding the sites e.g. in SHELXD and separately
(using known sites) for giving best phases e.g. in SHARP. there could
be differences.



Yes, maybe it is finally time to get past the rumour stage of software 
comparison. The only way I can think of is to start with a standard set 
of data that cover the range of typical experimental situations.


The Quality Control article in  XDSwiki ( 
http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/xdswiki/index.php/Quality_Control 
) is meant to enable users and developers to do exactly what Clemens 
proposes.


Users/developers can download the datasets that this article talks 
about, and run them through their favourite data reduction program(s), 
and report the results in new articles linked to the Quality Control one.


But one word of warning: comparisons of complex pieces of software are 
not entirely straightforward; e.g. different people may obtain different 
results with the same software package, and different versions of the 
same software may behave differently. So this is a never-ending project. 
Nevertheless I do believe that one can learn a lot about using software 
in the right way, for a given project, and generalize from that.


best,

Kay
--
Kay Diederichshttp://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Tel +49 7531 88 4049 Fax 3183
Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Box M647, D-78457 Konstanz

This e-mail is digitally signed. If your e-mail client does not have the
necessary capabilites, please ignore the attached signature smime.p7s.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[ccp4bb] Comparison of Integration Programs (was: Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?)

2008-10-28 Thread Winter, G (Graeme)
Hi Folks,

The idea of comparing different data reduction packages is an
interesting one. It is not however without challenges as alluded to by
Kay. As far as I can see there are two main challenges - the first is
that different users when given the same tools will do different things
- in challenging cases this will be very significant [Kay's point]. The
second is to be able to express why a given package did better than
others for a specific case, then bootstrap your way back to some general
rules (i.e. expertise) about the packages for future reference. For a
single case this was looked at in (ahem):

Acta Cryst. (2007). F63, 168-172 Structure of 5-formyltetrahydrofolate
cyclo-ligase from Bacillus anthracis (BA4489)
C. Meier , L. G. Carter, G. Winter, R. J. Owens, D. I. Stuart and R. M.
Esnouf 

Where we concluded that XDS did a better job than Mosflm or Denzo
because the mosaic spread was rather high and the oscillations a little
narrow. We did not try d*TREK but I would anticipate it would work well
as the method of integration is similar to XDS. The better job in
question though was to give a data set which would give a refinable
molecular replacement solution, where the others did not.

Now something which I have been interested in doing but which is almost
certainly prohibitively expensive in terms of time is to take a number
of data sets of varying levels of challenge and get the program authors
(or delegated experts) to do their absolute best with the data reduction
with that program, then compare the results. This will help to reduce
the impact of lesser known but very helpful options (i.e. outlier
recycling in XDS CORRECT, say) and perhaps generate a more fair
comparison. In the example above there may have been some tweaks which
could have been made to improve the results substantially for the 2D
integration packages.

For most (easy) cases however the best tool for the job is the one you
know best. If you have the spare CPU horsepower and time, you can always
reduce the data with all available packages and see which one gives the
best results for your case - something which would be perfectly
reasonable for substructure determination but much more unusual for data
reduction. From my testing of xia2 against structural genomics data I
can say that, for easy data, there is not much to call between Mosflm /
Scala and XDS / XSCALE.

Just my 2c.

Cheers,

Graeme


Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-28 Thread Pete Meyer
Gerard,

Thank you very much for clearing that up.  It's always good to hear that
there's one less things I need to worry about.

Pete

Gerard Bricogne wrote:
 Dear Pete,
 
  Thank you for your message. I can confirm that you need not worry about
 this clause: it is meant to prohibit the aggressive use of code decompilers
 with the intention of stealing the content of the source code. What you have
 described in your hypothetical example is nothing of the sort, but instead a
 very useful kind of comparative evaluation.
 
 
  With best wishes,
  
   Gerard.
 
 --
 On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:53:19AM -0500, Pete Meyer wrote:
 Apologies for going slightly further off-topic...

 Last time I had a free half-day to look into sharp, I noticed that the
 academic license prohibits reverse-engineering.  This seemed to put any
 comparative testing into a slightly grey area.  For example, if I find
 that sharp does the best job refining sites, but bp3 outputs better
 phases for a dataset due to different representation of phase
 probabilities*, I've implicitly constructed a primitive model of how
 sharp is working.  This seems close enough to a first step of
 reverse-engineering that I was concerned.

 Could someone confirm that I'm worrying about things I don't need to here?

 Pete

 * Purely hypothetical example.

 


Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-27 Thread Clemens Vonrhein
Dear Bill,,

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:18:05PM -0700, William G. Scott wrote:
 I'm actually one of those whom has struggled unsuccessfully to install 
 Sharp.  I can't even remember why, and I am certain it was entirely my 
 fault, but this did get me wondering...

I guess this is often a more general problem: when we're dealing with
a crystallographic problem that our current set of practices doesn't
deal satisfactorily with and we would like to try out another program,
this is usually also a time of great stress and pressure (competitors,
supervisors, finishing PhD etc). Ideally one would want to install and
learn how to use a new software package when there is a half day or
day time ... seldom happens.

Without getting into details of installation, usually ( 90%) it is
enough to download our packages and then run ./installSHARP -F. I
might be wrong - but this could be a problem of not getting enough
feedback about failed attempts (time pressure?). So please tell us
about installation problems (or any problems) - hopefully this is a
small price to pay for getting the software for free. If you feel like
sending us positive feedback - even better (especially since
crystallographic software doesn't get citations anymore these days
... maybe hidden in supplementary material that isn't easily visible
through any search system I know of).

 mlphare and MIR/MAD phasing seems to me the weak point in the ccp4 
 distribution. (I've often switched over to CNS to calculate phases and 
 solvent-flatten them.)

 Is there any chance your team might be inspired, persuaded or bribed to 
 create a drop-in replacement for mlphare, maybe a sharp light for 
 boneheads like me? Something that uses the same I/O and interface as ccp4?

A drop-in replacement would be very tricky: the concepts of SHARP are
quite different (there is no such thing as 'native' or 'derivative') -
but this adds a huge amount of flexibility.

However, in the next 6.1 release there will be a autoSHARP CCP4i
interface already in the CCP4 distribution (it's already there in the
latest 6.0.99 prerelease or the CVS sources). Although this will still
require the installation of SHARP/autoSHARP itself, at least one could
run autoSHARP without the need of running a httpd. But be aware that
using the CCP4i interface does limit you somewhat - a lot of the
additional tools (regarding density modification, checking/finding
sites via LLG maps, fine-tuning SHARP and viewing maps directly)
aren't easily accessible this way.

But autoSHARP should deal with all the situations that mlphare etc are
dealing with: SIRAS, SAD, MIRAS, MAD etc. And if you want to do (or
need to do) MAD+native+derivative or TaBr-cluster phasing or
site-specific radiation damage or other more complex phasing
scenarios: SHARP itself is the tool for doing all that.

Cheers

Clemens

-- 

***
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
*
*  Global Phasing Ltd.
*  Sheraton House, Castle Park 
*  Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK
*--
* BUSTER Development Group  (http://www.globalphasing.com)
***


Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-27 Thread Phil Evans
I would like to add my comments that Sharp  autoSharp are great  
programs that produce excellent phases, and that installation isn't  
too hard (even though the whole setup does seem unnecessarily  
complicated :-) )


I would also like to say that the Global Phasing people, in particular  
Clemens Vonrhein, are extraordinarily helpful and respond quickly to  
any query about the software


On the original question that started this thread, as far as I can see  
there doesn't seem to be a Mac OSX intel version available, publicly  
at least


Thanks
Phil Evans


On 27 Oct 2008, at 08:22, Clemens Vonrhein wrote:


Dear Bill,,

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:18:05PM -0700, William G. Scott wrote:
I'm actually one of those whom has struggled unsuccessfully to  
install
Sharp.  I can't even remember why, and I am certain it was entirely  
my

fault, but this did get me wondering...


I guess this is often a more general problem: when we're dealing with
a crystallographic problem that our current set of practices doesn't
deal satisfactorily with and we would like to try out another program,
this is usually also a time of great stress and pressure (competitors,
supervisors, finishing PhD etc). Ideally one would want to install and
learn how to use a new software package when there is a half day or
day time ... seldom happens.

Without getting into details of installation, usually ( 90%) it is
enough to download our packages and then run ./installSHARP -F. I
might be wrong - but this could be a problem of not getting enough
feedback about failed attempts (time pressure?). So please tell us
about installation problems (or any problems) - hopefully this is a
small price to pay for getting the software for free. If you feel like
sending us positive feedback - even better (especially since
crystallographic software doesn't get citations anymore these days
... maybe hidden in supplementary material that isn't easily visible
through any search system I know of).


mlphare and MIR/MAD phasing seems to me the weak point in the ccp4
distribution. (I've often switched over to CNS to calculate phases  
and

solvent-flatten them.)

Is there any chance your team might be inspired, persuaded or  
bribed to

create a drop-in replacement for mlphare, maybe a sharp light for
boneheads like me? Something that uses the same I/O and interface  
as ccp4?


A drop-in replacement would be very tricky: the concepts of SHARP are
quite different (there is no such thing as 'native' or 'derivative') -
but this adds a huge amount of flexibility.

However, in the next 6.1 release there will be a autoSHARP CCP4i
interface already in the CCP4 distribution (it's already there in the
latest 6.0.99 prerelease or the CVS sources). Although this will still
require the installation of SHARP/autoSHARP itself, at least one could
run autoSHARP without the need of running a httpd. But be aware that
using the CCP4i interface does limit you somewhat - a lot of the
additional tools (regarding density modification, checking/finding
sites via LLG maps, fine-tuning SHARP and viewing maps directly)
aren't easily accessible this way.

But autoSHARP should deal with all the situations that mlphare etc are
dealing with: SIRAS, SAD, MIRAS, MAD etc. And if you want to do (or
need to do) MAD+native+derivative or TaBr-cluster phasing or
site-specific radiation damage or other more complex phasing
scenarios: SHARP itself is the tool for doing all that.

Cheers

Clemens

--

***
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
*
*  Global Phasing Ltd.
*  Sheraton House, Castle Park
*  Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK
*--
* BUSTER Development Group  (http://www.globalphasing.com)
***


Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-27 Thread James Stroud

Yikes!

Apologies if that was over the top. I guess the chisanbop comment did  
not properly convey the hyperbole, and hence humor, I was trying to  
achieve. Hopefully my comments can still be taken as the constructive  
criticism they were intended to be.


James

On Oct 26, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Gerard Bricogne wrote:


Dear James,

I am rather surprised and disappointed to find such an  
intemperate,
ill-judged and almost slanderous statement from you, especially in a  
posting
to a bulletin board that is intended for the sharing of experience  
and good

will and to which you have been such a regular and valued contributor.

To deal with slander first: Global phasing has been operating  
for over
10 years without ever being, or intending to be, anyone's chance to  
just
try and make a buck. We develop our software thank to a mix of  
funding that
does include industrial sponsors, but we distribute it free of  
charge to
academic users (since 2002 we have issued over 3500 licence keys for  
SHARP
to academic users). We even give support to academic users, and  
spare no
pains in doing so, as many users can testify: this is not exactly  
the most
lucrative occupation if one is looking to make a buck. Global  
Phasing's
staff consists of eight scientists, plus one part-time person to  
keep the
books and get the annual accounts audited. The company has never had  
any
investors, and spends all its income on scientists' salaries and  
running
costs. Perhaps the .com suffix has acquired a bad smell in other  
parts of

the world, but in this case your insinuations are badly misguided.

If you have had difficulties installing software from us, a more
constructive form of feedback would be to write to us at sharp- 
develop or
buster-develop (both @globalphasing.com) and explain the nature of  
those
difficulties. We have often found that the worst problems occur when  
people,
instead of writing to us, start to try and hack the scripts  
themselves and
end up tying themselves in inextricable knots. One of your remarks  
seems to
want to imply that we have taken a perverse pleasure in making  
installations
difficult. It is true that we still carry a legacy from earlier days  
when
some of our sponsors wanted to be able to distribute jobs over  
heterogeneous
clusters of machines and to view the results from any other machine  
on that
network, while most users today just want to run everything on one  
machine.
Our installation procedures have kept evolving to become simpler and  
more
robust, although the need to link up with several third-party  
packages makes
it hard to suppress complexity entirely. If you happen to have  
constructive
suggestions to make in this direction, we will be only too happy to  
listen
to them and will do our best to make use of them. We do have,  
however, to
weigh up how much time to devote to these issues, vs. how much to  
developing

and implementing new methods.

I hope you will take the time to write to either of the mailing  
lists I
indicated above to explain what simplifications you would like to  
see in our

current installation procedures, and look forward to reading them.


With best wishes,

 Gerard.


--
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:40:35AM -0700, James Stroud wrote:

The info at

 http://www.globalphasing.com/buster/installation/index.html#requirements

will give you some hints about whether it will be successful on OS  
X. As

per the Global Phasing modus operandi, any instruction involving
installation of their software is muddled in riddle and ambiguity.  
They
have made an art of making their software difficult to install. I  
guess the
philosophy is that if you can somehow get their software installed,  
then
you have earned your phase information. Personally, I'd rather  
solve my
structure with using chisanbop and a pencil than attempt to install  
Global

Phasing software.

Speaking from experience, this is my 2c. Apologies if I hurt anyone's
feelings who are just trying to make a buck.

James





On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:39 AM, jacques-philippe colletier wrote:


Hi everydoby,
I`d like to know if there is a version of BUSTER-TNT available on  
MacOSX ?

Anyone knows ?


*
Dr. Jacques-Philippe Colletier
UCLA / DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
90095 Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*


--
James Stroud
UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
Box 951570
Los Angeles, CA  90095

http://www.jamesstroud.com


--

===
* *
* Gerard Bricogne [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *
* *
* Global Phasing Ltd. *
* Sheraton House, Castle Park   

Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-27 Thread Gerard Bricogne
Dear Jacques-Philippe,

 Sorry to have been distracted into responding to comments on your
question rather than answering your question itself.

 We will shortly be announcing an academic release of a new version of
BUSTER-TNT, which contains several major improvements over the previous one.
It has been under beta-testing since July and has also been made available
to a few academic labs with whom we have a beta-testing arrangement.

 This new version is in the last stages of being ported to MacOSX, but
for the Intel processor only. I hope this release will come in time for your
needs. You are welcome to get in touch for more details through the mailing
list [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


 With best wishes,
 
  Gerard.

--
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 09:39:03AM -0700, jacques-philippe colletier wrote:
 Hi everydoby,
 I`d like to know if there is a version of BUSTER-TNT available on MacOSX ?
 Anyone knows ?


 *
 Dr. Jacques-Philippe Colletier
 UCLA / DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
 90095 Los Angeles, CA, USA
 *
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *

-- 

 ===
 * *
 * Gerard Bricogne [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *
 * *
 * Global Phasing Ltd. *
 * Sheraton House, Castle Park Tel: +44-(0)1223-353033 *
 * Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK   Fax: +44-(0)1223-366889 *
 * *
 ===


Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-27 Thread Warren DeLano
James,

If I may chime in here, as the head of a similar effort half as old and
one quarter the size of Global Phasing...

We scientists heading up private crystallography  related software
efforts tend to be hypersensitive to such criticisms because of certain
unfortunate past behaviors of commercial entities, who clearly were
just trying to make a buck, rather than trying to help their
colleagues or advance science.

So even the suggestion that one of us might be becoming that which
initially drove us to achieve independence from the
academic-to-industrial software licensing complex is an anathema
guaranteed to engender a strong reaction.  But there is more to it than
that:

For one thing, if we were just trying to make a buck from software,
then we would all be idiots for attempting to do so in a field
increasingly dominated by excellent free, academic, and open-source
solutions.  But we're not idiots -- we're in this area by desire and by
choice, not by necessity.  There are far more software bucks to be made
downstream of basic research...

For another thing, most of our businesses engage in practices
deliberately inconsistent with making as many bucks as possible, such
as:  giving source code away unconditionally, making executables
available at no cost to some users, and providing certain types of
support at no charge -- so long as we can continue to make ends meet.
That is compelling evidence that we all care more about helping our
colleagues and about advancing science than about raking in the dough.

Of course, knowing you personally, I don't think you meant anything with
that hyperbole, but I can understand Gerard's reaction to it.  

So, in summary, going after us small private businesses for weak
documentation, complex installations, sporadic crashes, or lack of undo
-- that stuff is all fair game.  But calling us just buck makers?  Now
that's below the belt, even in jest!

Cheers,
Warren
DeLano Scientific LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Stroud
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 5:03 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

Yikes!

Apologies if that was over the top. I guess the chisanbop comment did
not properly convey the hyperbole, and hence humor, I was trying to
achieve. Hopefully my comments can still be taken as the constructive
criticism they were intended to be.

James

On Oct 26, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Gerard Bricogne wrote:

 Dear James,

 I am rather surprised and disappointed to find such an  
 intemperate,
 ill-judged and almost slanderous statement from you, especially in a  
 posting
 to a bulletin board that is intended for the sharing of experience  
 and good
 will and to which you have been such a regular and valued contributor.

 To deal with slander first: Global phasing has been operating  
 for over
 10 years without ever being, or intending to be, anyone's chance to  
 just
 try and make a buck. We develop our software thank to a mix of  
 funding that
 does include industrial sponsors, but we distribute it free of  
 charge to
 academic users (since 2002 we have issued over 3500 licence keys for  
 SHARP
 to academic users). We even give support to academic users, and  
 spare no
 pains in doing so, as many users can testify: this is not exactly  
 the most
 lucrative occupation if one is looking to make a buck. Global  
 Phasing's
 staff consists of eight scientists, plus one part-time person to  
 keep the
 books and get the annual accounts audited. The company has never had  
 any
 investors, and spends all its income on scientists' salaries and  
 running
 costs. Perhaps the .com suffix has acquired a bad smell in other  
 parts of
 the world, but in this case your insinuations are badly misguided.

 If you have had difficulties installing software from us, a more
 constructive form of feedback would be to write to us at sharp- 
 develop or
 buster-develop (both @globalphasing.com) and explain the nature of  
 those
 difficulties. We have often found that the worst problems occur when  
 people,
 instead of writing to us, start to try and hack the scripts  
 themselves and
 end up tying themselves in inextricable knots. One of your remarks  
 seems to
 want to imply that we have taken a perverse pleasure in making  
 installations
 difficult. It is true that we still carry a legacy from earlier days  
 when
 some of our sponsors wanted to be able to distribute jobs over  
 heterogeneous
 clusters of machines and to view the results from any other machine  
 on that
 network, while most users today just want to run everything on one  
 machine.
 Our installation procedures have kept evolving to become simpler and  
 more
 robust, although the need to link up with several third-party  
 packages makes
 it hard to suppress complexity entirely. If you happen to have  
 constructive
 suggestions to make in this direction, we will be only too happy

Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-27 Thread Juergen Bosch

@all,

we've been comparing various programs during our SGPP times (that was  
about 2 years ago) Sharp, Shelx, bp3, mlphare, SnB (BnP). If I  
remember it correctly at that time Sharp was the winner, although the  
site finding was the major bottleneck/problem. What we ended doing was  
finding sites (SeMet) by an external program (most of the time Shelx)  
and feeding them into Sharp.


I do remember long time ago the setup on a G5 MacPro which worked  
fine, I did have quite some exchange with Clemens to get it running  
though - mostly because I'm a user and not a programmer.


On a side note we also looked at HKL, Mosflm, XDS processing of data,  
we observed differences in the ability of e.g. Shelx to locate SeMet  
sites depending on the processing program you used. Of course perfect  
data was undistinguishable, but some datasets which were more tricky  
to process showed significant differences in locating the SeMet  
positions. In those cases XDS was better. This is of course running  
all programs with their default parameters and not tweaking them.


Jürgen

On 27 Oct 2008, at 08:30, Clemens Vonrhein wrote:


Dear Pete,

just my personal view on this (so don't take this as a legal expertise
regarding our SHARP licence). I don't have any problems with people
comparing software programs - I do that all the time. I doubt this can
be seen as reverse engineering.

The tricky part comes when comparisons are being published: ideally it
would be nice if every developer of a particular piece of software is
given the chance to comment - maybe he/she could even give a few
simple advices how to run the program. After all, different programs
might have different set of defaults (conservative versus
adventurous) for particular problems.

It's similar to a problem we discover e.g. in a PDB entry: contacting
the authors of that PDB entry first to give them a chance to comment
(and correct) I think is the apropriate initial step. Or actually -
lets rephrase that: it's not like an error in a PDB entry!
Improvements in software benefit a lot more crystallographers whereas
a fixed PDB entry usually concerns a much smaller group of us.

Anyway, I think we're doing actually fairly well compared to other
scientific fields: crystallographic method developers are a very
friendly bunch I must say, even if we're in a kind of 'competition'.


Cheers

Clemens


On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:53:19AM -0500, Pete Meyer wrote:

Apologies for going slightly further off-topic...

Last time I had a free half-day to look into sharp, I noticed that  
the
academic license prohibits reverse-engineering.  This seemed to put  
any
comparative testing into a slightly grey area.  For example, if I  
find

that sharp does the best job refining sites, but bp3 outputs better
phases for a dataset due to different representation of phase
probabilities*, I've implicitly constructed a primitive model of how
sharp is working.  This seems close enough to a first step of
reverse-engineering that I was concerned.

Could someone confirm that I'm worrying about things I don't need  
to here?


Pete

* Purely hypothetical example.


--

***
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
*
*  Global Phasing Ltd.
*  Sheraton House, Castle Park
*  Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK
*--
* BUSTER Development Group  (http://www.globalphasing.com)
***


-
Jürgen Bosch
University of Washington
Dept. of Biochemistry, K-426
1705 NE Pacific Street
Seattle, WA 98195
Box 357742
Phone:   +1-206-616-4510
FAX: +1-206-685-7002
Web: http://faculty.washington.edu/jbosch


[ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-26 Thread jacques-philippe colletier

Hi everydoby,
I`d like to know if there is a version of BUSTER-TNT available on  
MacOSX ?

Anyone knows ?


*
Dr. Jacques-Philippe Colletier
UCLA / DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
90095 Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*


Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-26 Thread James Stroud

The info at

  http://www.globalphasing.com/buster/installation/index.html#requirements

will give you some hints about whether it will be successful on OS X.  
As per the Global Phasing modus operandi, any instruction involving  
installation of their software is muddled in riddle and ambiguity.  
They have made an art of making their software difficult to install. I  
guess the philosophy is that if you can somehow get their software  
installed, then you have earned your phase information. Personally,  
I'd rather solve my structure with using chisanbop and a pencil than  
attempt to install Global Phasing software.


Speaking from experience, this is my 2c. Apologies if I hurt anyone's  
feelings who are just trying to make a buck.


James





On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:39 AM, jacques-philippe colletier wrote:


Hi everydoby,
I`d like to know if there is a version of BUSTER-TNT available on  
MacOSX ?

Anyone knows ?


*
Dr. Jacques-Philippe Colletier
UCLA / DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
90095 Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*


--
James Stroud
UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
Box 951570
Los Angeles, CA  90095

http://www.jamesstroud.com


Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-26 Thread Ashley Buckle
Having solved a few structures using AutoSHARP, I feel compelled to  
comment on the CCP4BB that I  really like the software, never had a  
major problem  installing or using it, feel extremely grateful to the  
guys at Global Phasing for making this available to us all, and for  
(in my case at least) responding to my queries quickly and helpfully.   
cheers

Ashley

On 26/10/2008, at 7:40 PM, James Stroud wrote:


The info at

 http://www.globalphasing.com/buster/installation/index.html#requirements

will give you some hints about whether it will be successful on OS  
X. As per the Global Phasing modus operandi, any instruction  
involving installation of their software is muddled in riddle and  
ambiguity. They have made an art of making their software difficult  
to install. I guess the philosophy is that if you can somehow get  
their software installed, then you have earned your phase  
information. Personally, I'd rather solve my structure with using  
chisanbop and a pencil than attempt to install Global Phasing  
software.


Speaking from experience, this is my 2c. Apologies if I hurt  
anyone's feelings who are just trying to make a buck.


James





On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:39 AM, jacques-philippe colletier wrote:


Hi everydoby,
I`d like to know if there is a version of BUSTER-TNT available on  
MacOSX ?

Anyone knows ?


*
Dr. Jacques-Philippe Colletier
UCLA / DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
90095 Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*


--
James Stroud
UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
Box 951570
Los Angeles, CA  90095

http://www.jamesstroud.com




Associate Professor Ashley M Buckle
NHMRC Senior Research Fellow
The Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine 
Victorian Bioinformatics Consortium (VBC)
Monash University, Clayton, Vic 3800
Australia

http://www.med.monash.edu.au/biochem/staff/abuckle.html
iChat/AIM: blindcaptaincat
skype: ashley.buckle
Tel: (613) 9902 0269 (office)
Tel: (613) 9905 1653 (lab)

Fax : (613) 9905 4699






Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-26 Thread William G. Scott

Dear Gerard et al:

I'm actually one of those whom has struggled unsuccessfully to install  
Sharp.  I can't even remember why, and I am certain it was entirely my  
fault, but this did get me wondering...


mlphare and MIR/MAD phasing seems to me the weak point in the ccp4  
distribution. (I've often switched over to CNS to calculate phases and  
solvent-flatten them.)


Is there any chance your team might be inspired, persuaded or bribed  
to create a drop-in replacement for mlphare, maybe a sharp light for  
boneheads like me? Something that uses the same I/O and interface as  
ccp4?


Like me, James might have what Edward Abbey (one of the very few  
decent American writers since Mark Twain) once referred to as a  
tendency to over-exaggerate in his rhetorical flourishes. I hope  
mine are viewed charitably and are designed for entertainment purposes  
only.


All the best.

Bill


Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-26 Thread James Whisstock
I heartily agree with Ash and Gerald  - Autosharp (which we routinely use for 
experimental phasing) is free for academics and in my opinion is an outstanding 
package.  Further, we have always found the people at Global Phasing are always 
extremely helpful with all sorts of phasing questions not just installation!  
From a personal perspective I would always rather have free or low cost 
packages that require a little bit of setup than being charged like a wounded 
bull for a commercial package.

J
Ashley Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Having solved a few structures using AutoSHARP, I feel compelled to
 comment on the CCP4BB that I  really like the software, never had a
 major problem  installing or using it, feel extremely grateful to the
 guys at Global Phasing for making this available to us all, and for
 (in my case at least) responding to my queries quickly and helpfully.
 cheers
 Ashley
 
 On 26/10/2008, at 7:40 PM, James Stroud wrote:
 
 The info at


  http://www.globalphasing.com/buster/installation/index.html#requirements

 will give you some hints about whether it will be successful on OS
 X. As per the Global Phasing modus operandi, any instruction
 involving installation of their software is muddled in riddle and
 ambiguity. They have made an art of making their software difficult
 to install. I guess the philosophy is that if you can somehow get
 their software installed, then you have earned your phase
 information. Personally, I'd rather solve my structure with using
 chisanbop and a pencil than attempt to install Global Phasing
 software.

 Speaking from experience, this is my 2c. Apologies if I hurt
 anyone's feelings who are just trying to make a buck.

 James





 On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:39 AM, jacques-philippe colletier wrote:

 Hi everydoby,
 I`d like to know if there is a version of BUSTER-TNT available on
 MacOSX ?
 Anyone knows ?


 *
 Dr. Jacques-Philippe Colletier
 UCLA / DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
 90095 Los Angeles, CA, USA
 *
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *

 --
 James Stroud
 UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
 Box 951570
 Los Angeles, CA  90095

 http://www.jamesstroud.com
 
 
 
 Associate Professor Ashley M Buckle
 NHMRC Senior Research Fellow
 The Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
 School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine 
 Victorian Bioinformatics Consortium (VBC)
 Monash University, Clayton, Vic 3800
 Australia
 
 http://www.med.monash.edu.au/biochem/staff/abuckle.html
 iChat/AIM: blindcaptaincat
 skype: ashley.buckle
 Tel: (613) 9902 0269 (office)
 Tel: (613) 9905 1653 (lab)
 
 Fax : (613) 9905 4699
-- 
Professor James Whisstock
NHMRC Principal Research Fellow / Monash University Senior Logan fellow

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Monash University, Clayton Campus, PO Box 13d, VIC, 3800, Australia
+613 9905 3747 (Phone)
+613 9905 4699 (Fax)
+61 418 170 585 (Mobile)