Re: Switching exam question [7:23497]

2001-10-20 Thread EA Louie

 so the risk of a bridge loop is better than a recalculation of spanning
tree
 ;-

sure, especially when you KNOW you're in a loop-free environment.  of
course, my motto is spanning tree bridging, don't leave home without it.

I've seen goofy things happen without spanning tree or with partial spanning
tree running in a looped environment.  (don't ask about 'partial spanning
tree' - I still can't figure out how they did that and why)  And I've seen
goofy things happen with spanning tree in big redundant environments,
especially with respect to not being able to control which ports get
disabled in a loop path.  The morale of the story there is the path you want
to have disabled (the redundant one between switches) will always be
enabled, and vice versa (as in the uplink to the router will be disabled).




_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23608t=23497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: X2 command on a Term Serv?? [7:23475]

2001-10-20 Thread Richard Botham

Brian,
Thank you very much for that information

Best Regards
Richard


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23609t=23475
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VTY password on CatOS [7:23610]

2001-10-20 Thread Hans Stout

Hello colleagues,

does anybody know how to set the VTY password on a CatOS-based switch ? All 
I could find is the 'set password' command.
Thanks for your help in advance.

Regards,

Hans


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23610t=23610
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Netsys Baseliner [7:23611]

2001-10-20 Thread Hans Stout

Hello colleagues,

I am trying to find information about the Netsys Baseliner, as far as I know 
it is an EoL product and not available anymore. I know that there once was 
an evaluation CD; does anybody know if that CD is still available, or can I 
get it from somebody ? Or is somebody willing to sell his or her version 
(NT) to me ?

Regards,

Hans

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23611t=23611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VTY password on CatOS [7:23610]

2001-10-20 Thread Brad Moss

Set pass should set the console, vty, and aux. with the same password.

Brad Moss,  CCNA
Network Administrator
CHRISTUS St. Joseph's Medical Center - South
www.christushealth.org
(903) 737-3160
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hans
Stout
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 4:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VTY password on CatOS [7:23610]

Hello colleagues,

does anybody know how to set the VTY password on a CatOS-based switch ? All
I could find is the 'set password' command.
Thanks for your help in advance.

Regards,

Hans


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23615t=23610
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]

2001-10-20 Thread EA Louie

oh my... you'd refer a complete beginner to the website to learn how to
download code over local serial links?  :-(

maybe from the TAC area, where the recipe and details were already laid out,
but not from the documentation - you try it from the manuals...here's the
12.0 documentation for that: (to this day, I don't think I could do it from
this information)
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/fun_c
/fcprt2/fcimages.htm

this is a great opportunity to teach someone 'how to' without actually being
at their side, although the one of the hits on the search for 'copy tftp
flash' did lead me to this page:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/130/sw_upgrade_proc_flash.shtml

-e-

- Original Message -
From: George Murphy CCNP, CCDP 
To: 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]


 Kenneth, now is a good time to get familiar with the Cisco website. You
 should download
 a TFTP server, check your router specs, match them to the right IOS
 according to the
 available matrix, download, start tftp, get into enable mode and #copy
tftp
 flash ... It
 would be good to get the by the book instructions from the site or any
 other handy
 resources

 Kenneth Yeung wrote:

  Hi all,
  As a beginner, i am setting up home lab.  Can anyone give me the detail
  procedure of how to upgrade the IOS of C2521.
  I got no problem with my C2503 because it has a Ethernet port for me to
  connect the PC to it.
 
  Kenneth
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23616t=23498
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VPN 3005 Concentrator/Filters [7:23617]

2001-10-20 Thread Jeff Duchin

Anyone have this tweaked out yet as far as filters go? I want to only allow
necessary traffic on the Public interface and drop everything else. Any help
would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Jeff




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23617t=23617
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Switching exam question [7:23497]

2001-10-20 Thread Jonathan Hays

Hmm. Interesting. Which course are you referring to? I haven't seen that
reference
myself but I believe you.

I have yet to disable STP on a trunk port myself or see it done by any of
the many ISPs
I have encountered in the last 3-4 years. Most people I have worked with
consider the
price of running STP mandatory insurance against loops (since you never know
what's
going to happen once you have completed the project). Although not a
programmer myself
several network programmers have given me the impression that most switch
software is
optimized for STP which leaves me to doubt that disabling it is going to buy
you much
increased efficiency.

But I may be way off base. Is this something you have seen in the field?

Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote:

 Actually, Cisco teaches that in certain circumstances in the Core, you want
 to disable Spanning Tree Protocol (STP).  I don't have the courseware with
 me at the moment, but I guess the thinking is that with Core layer devices,
 you don't run anything extraneous that takes away from the primary role of
 high-speed packet switching.  STP is considered extraneous when it's not
 required.

 Instead of me posting from Cisco's course material once I'm at home, why
not
 search Cisco for this information... if you're interested in knowing more.

   -- Leigh Anne

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  Jonathan Hays
  Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:20 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Switching exam question [7:23497]
 
 
  Yes. For the server to have a fully redundant connection it must have a
  second NIC to
  another switch and failover software in place.
 
  However, you are mistaken that anyone would normally disable STP on any
  trunk port,
  regardless of whether the switch is in the Core, Distribution, or Access
  layer.
 
  Piatnitchi Cristian wrote:
 
   Please see this link
  
   http://www.geocities.com/cristi_piatnitchi/
   This is picture from the Cisco site.
  
   Could you explain me how the redundacy is achieved for the
  server present
  on
   this scheme ?
   In my opinion if there is no STP in the L2 core and nor a
  second connection
   from  the server to the other switch cb
   there is no protection against of a failure of switch ca. So
  I consider
  is
   useless to have redundancy in the access and
   distribution layers. Am I wrong ? If yes why ?
  
   Thanks in advance
   Cristian




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23605t=23497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Design Question - Spanning-tree Protocol. [7:23614]

2001-10-20 Thread Urooj's Hi-speed Internet

Hi Folks,
I have a design in which Cisco 3548 XL's are GBIC-stacked on various floors
of a campus and are uplinked to a core Cat 6509 switch. The uplink from
every floor stack is ether-channeled to the core via two parallel equal-cost
paths. One uplink path starts forwarding and the other goes into
blocking mode from each floor stack.

Here is my confusion... If only one link of a 400 MBps full-duplex
ether-channel fails from the forwarding path , will it invoke spanning-tree
recalculation ??? Or will the 'now' sub-optimal path still remain in
forwarding mode and the now more-bandwidth path remain in blocking mode ???

Since spanning-tree recalculation causes a lot of ripples throughout the
switched network, I would assume that the latter were true. However, I would
like to hear views from people who would think that the former scenario is
more probable.

Thanks very much.

Aziz




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23614t=23614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Switching exam question [7:23497]

2001-10-20 Thread Chuck Larrieu

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
EA Louie
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 12:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Switching exam question [7:23497]


 so the risk of a bridge loop is better than a recalculation of spanning
tree
 ;-

sure, especially when you KNOW you're in a loop-free environment.

CL: never underestimate the probability that what you KNOW will not remain
true for long :-

of course, my motto is spanning tree bridging, don't leave home without
it.

I've seen goofy things happen without spanning tree or with partial spanning
tree running in a looped environment.  (don't ask about 'partial spanning
tree' - I still can't figure out how they did that and why)  And I've seen
goofy things happen with spanning tree in big redundant environments,
especially with respect to not being able to control which ports get
disabled in a loop path.  The morale of the story there is the path you want
to have disabled (the redundant one between switches) will always be
enabled, and vice versa (as in the uplink to the router will be disabled).

CL: this probably explains why The Powers That Be spend so much time trying
to teach us how spanning tree works, and provide the ability to change
bridge priorities. CCIE types are SUPPOSED to draw out their diagrams, and
calculate the paths, and set the priorities so that the things you describe
don't happen. The truth is, most of us, CCIE or otherwise, just muddle
through. :-




_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23618t=23497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Switching exam question [7:23497]

2001-10-20 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

   so the risk of a bridge loop is better than a recalculation of spanning
tree
  ;-

sure, especially when you KNOW you're in a loop-free environment.  of
course, my motto is spanning tree bridging, don't leave home without it.

I've seen goofy things happen without spanning tree or with partial spanning
tree running in a looped environment.  (don't ask about 'partial spanning
tree' - I still can't figure out how they did that and why)  And I've seen
goofy things happen with spanning tree in big redundant environments,
especially with respect to not being able to control which ports get
disabled in a loop path.  The morale of the story there is the path you want
to have disabled (the redundant one between switches) will always be
enabled, and vice versa (as in the uplink to the router will be disabled).

Perhaps not a general application, but the intercarrier exchange 
point operators have been pleading for switches where STP is off by 
default.  Now, understand their environment is very controlled, with 
point-to-point or at most point-to-two-point links among routers 
through a common fabric.  They use VLANs as points on a virtual patch 
panel. They may use them to distinguish among customers (who are 
ISPs), and possibly between multicast and unicast services.

There was a presentation at the last Washington NANOG on this, by 
Paul Vixie.  There is even more continuing discussion in the European 
Exchange Point Operators mailing list under RIPE.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23619t=23497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IOS upgrade problem - 2621 [7:23526]

2001-10-20 Thread kwock99

I have tried to use the tftpdnld at the rommon prompt and get the following
error massage:

Please reset before executing this command

I key in all the parameter (IP address, tftp server address, etc). After
reset, I issue the command tftpdnld, and get the same error message again.

Any idea to solve this problem? Thanks.

Francis

- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: IOS upgrade problem - 2621 [7:23526]


 If the router will not boot then you must do this from rommon mode.
 When the router is attempting to boot, issue a break using whichever
 keys your terminal software expects.  When you get to a prompt, type
 tftpdnld in lowercase.  This will show you a list of variables that need
 to be set for a tftp transfer to work properly.  Connect the ethernet
 port on the router to your network (or laptop, or whatever has a valid
 image), set the necessary variables, and then type tftpdnld again.

 If all variables are set correctly the router will now begin a tftp
 transfer.  When it is finished, type i or reset to reboot the
 router.

 HTH,
 John

  kwock99  10/19/01 9:57:44 AM 
 I have upgraded the Router with the other IOS. After I download it to
 the
 router and it saved the new IOS to the flash successfully.

 After I power up the router, I get the error that the router does not
 have
 enought memory to run IOS. Anyone knows how to erase the new IOS and
 tftp
 back
 the old IOS to the router (2621).

 Thanks.

 Francis




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23620t=23526
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Gateway for VoIP [7:23219]

2001-10-20 Thread Matthew Pickens

Thomas,

   I am by no means an expert in this category, but I have started working
with AVVID recently.  You should look into Cisco's IPKeyswitch IOS feature
set.  This feature set is available in 12.1(5) YD3 or 12.2(2) XB.  The
IPKeyswitch functionality will allow a more feature rich environment for
your phone users.
 By employing 12.2.2XB on your 2600 series router and adding an NM-2V,
2-2port FXO WICS, and IP Phones with power (either power block or
C3524-XL-EN-PWR) you will be able to make a very reasonable system lacking
some key features.  You keep referring to using IP Phones, but then you also
mention regular phones in your original statement.  Your 2600 is going to
limit your ability to deploy in that case.  The minimum router you would
need is a 3640.  You will need to set up all your dial patterns on the
router so be sure that you are very comfortable with doing this or hire
someone to do it for you.
   You will need to map actual DIDs to extension DID, set up inward dial
maps and outward dialing maps, etc.

Good luck!

Matthew Pickens, CCNP, MCSE, SCP 
and working towards my CCIE and CCIP
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Please remove noabuse- from the email address when emailing ***

Thomas wrote:
 
 In my case, the frame circuit are already in place.  It's just
 a matter of
 getting the most out of that frame relay link, like VoIP, H323
 traffic for
 instant to save long distant call or video conferencing... 
 Again, Thanks!
 
 
 Mark Odette II  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  OK, here's one more tip then...
  If the Overseas office is there, and the HQ is here or in
 some other
  geographically separate region, you probably will be best set
 up with a FR
  connection b/t the two sites.  Anything else will probably be
 cost
  prohibitive, or will put too many hops in the picture to meet
 the latency
  requirements for voice.
 
  Good luck,
  Mark Odette II
  StellarConnection Services
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of
  Thomas
  Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:25 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Gateway for VoIP [7:23219]
 
 
  Thanks Mark!  Your side notes actually answer my question. 
 There's no
 doubt
  about having PBX at medium or large sites, and therefore a
 need for a
 T1/E1
  channalized gateway for voice/fax between the router and the
 PBX.  I am
 just
  concerning if I could do the scenario you just described for 
 a small
  oversea office of 4 or 5 sale people, where they don't have a
 PBX, but
 still
  able to use the IP phones to talk to HQ using the WAN (VoIP)
 and still
 able
  to talk to a regular analog phone with the FXO gateway
 attached to the
  router.
 
  Thomas N.
 
 
  Mark Odette II  wrote in message
  news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Thomas- You say that the site Does NOT have a PBX.  If
 this means that
   they(users) all have Analog phones, and you want to  give
 them the
 ability
   of IP phones, what exactly do you mean??
  
   Please define your problem more clearly so that you might
 have a few
   suggested solutions thrown out.
  
   Just as a side note- If you have a 2600 Series router, and
 you want to
 put
   voice on it (VoIP, VoFR, VoATM) for the purpose of having
 no more than 4
   people simultaneously calling 1 remote office, it is
 possible to connect
 4
   analog phones directly to it (on FXS ports) and have them
 dial out to
 the
   remote facility over a P-to-P WAN, saving LD costs.  But
 this is a
 rather
   small scale, unscalable option, and they still wouldn't
 have PSTN access
  on
   the same phone.  A second 2600 with 4 FXO ports would have
 to be added
 to
   the picture to give those 4 users access to the PSTN with a
 contrived
   dial-plan on the first 2600 pointing to the router with the
 FXO ports.
  
   To service users with VoIP and access to the PSTN, you WILL
 have to
  acquire
   some sort of separate Gateway/PBX/PABX.
  
   -Mark Odette II
   StellarConnection Services
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
   Thomas N.
   Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:06 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Gateway for VoIP [7:23219]
  
  
   Hi All,
  
   I have a small site that doesn't have a PBX.  This site has
 a Cisco 2600
   router.  I would like to integate the phone system with IP
 phones.  I
  wonder
   if there is any network module for the Cisco 2600 router
 that acts as a
   gateway directly to the POTS (regular phones)?  Thanks All!
  
   Thomas N.
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23621t=23219
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CCIE study Question : RIFs [7:22750]

2001-10-20 Thread Morgan, Peter (Engineering)

JAmes,

The RII bit is the first bit in the first byte of the source mac address and
signifies whether a RIF is present. It is NOT contained in the RIF and
indeed by definition cannot be.

-Original Message-
From: Pieter Jordaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 11:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE study Question : RIFs [7:22750]


It is the RII bit which is set to one to indicate that the rif is present.
The RII is in the header of the packet and indicates whether or not there is
a rif. The rif below is valid


James  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hello,

 I have been reading up on RIFs and one little part
 confuses me.. Says, if RIF is present the first bit of
 the first byte is set to 1 instead of 0. The RIF below
 I have is a valid RIF but the first bit of the first
 byte is 0 ?? Hope that someone can offer an
 explaination to this. I apologize if this topic is a
 rehash. Thanks for your time..

 0810.0012.00b3.00a0

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
 http://personals.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23622t=22750
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



EIGRP load balancing - variance command [7:23623]

2001-10-20 Thread kwock99

I have tried some basic testing on the EIGRP load balancing. For simplicity,
I only set up 4 router in order to get equal cost load balancing.


LANA**R1 --R2 --R4  LANB
   ||
  --R3

***: Ethernet
: Wan

If I use the default setting for the bandwidth and delay, I can get two
route from LAN A to LANB.

R1--R2--R4
R1--R3--R4

After I changed all the bandwidth of serial interface of R1, R2, R4 to
3000Kbit (default is 1544kbit), I cannot get two route to LAN B, only the
best route appears (R1--R2--R4). It is normal.

I key in the variance 128 command in R1 in order to get two route, but it
failed. The parameter 128 is make sure that the R1 will take any alternate
route to LAN B because the metric of R1--R3--R4 must be less than 128 *
(metric of R1--R2--R4).

Anyone have the idea? Thanks.

Francis




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23623t=23623
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CAT 2948G (L2) vs. CAT3548-XL [7:23563]

2001-10-20 Thread Chuck Larrieu

interesting dilemma.

you might want to check out Cisco's on line product quick reference at:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/752/qrg/
requires a CCO customer level login

or search through the guides on the freebie CCO.

looks to me like the 2948 has a 24 gig backplane, and Cisco claims it is
wire speed non blocking, which is not Cisco's usual approach to things. the
3548 has only a 10 gig backplane. IMHO the backplane issue can be
misleading. It is real tough to fill it under anything but specialized
extreme circumstances, at which point

the 2948 can do 1024 of 802.1q vlans, while the 3548 can only do 250, but
both ISL and dot1q.
again, IMHO, it is real tough for most business organizations to come up
with the need for more that a couple dozen VLANs. ISP's tend to use
zillions, for obvious reasons.

flip a coin? :-

Chuck

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Thomas
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CAT 2948G (L2) vs. CAT3548-XL [7:23563]


Hi All,

I saw an ads with Cisco CAT 2948G Layer 2 switch that has a price almost the
same as the Cisco CAT 3548-EN-XL.  Based on the discription, It seems that
the 2948G running CATOS, while 3548s running IOS.  Also, 2948G has a better
speed of up to 24Gbps whereas the 3548s only up to 10.8Gbps.  Assuming they
both are at the same price, which should I choose? I am also considering the
QoS on the switch to support VoIP.  Does 2948G support the same features as
3548XL as well?  We are using many of 3548s at the HQ and like to buy Cisco
CAT for remote offices.  Also, Is 2948G in End of Life or End of
Support?  Cisco just came out a new 2980G that is same as 2948G but has 80
10/100 ports.

Thomas N.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23624t=23563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]

2001-10-20 Thread Kenneth Yeung

Louie,
Thank you in advance.  I understand your procedure.  That's sound logical to
me.  Really appreciate!
But the upgrade has some problem with the following error message:
Proceed? [confirm]

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   8124000  c2500-js-l_112-19.bin
[8124064 bytes used, 264544 available, 8388608 total]
Address or name of remote host [10.1.4.2]?
Source file name? c2500-i-l.121-11.bin
Destination file name [c2500-i-l.121-11.bin]?
Accessing file 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' on 10.1.4.2...
Loading c2500-i-l.121-11.bin from 10.1.4.2 (via Serial0): ! [OK]

Erase flash device before writing? [confirm]
Flash contains files. Are you sure you want to erase? [confirm]

Copy 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' from server
  as 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' into Flash WITH erase? [yes/no]yes

%SYS-5-RELOAD: Reload requested
%FLH: c2500-i-l.121-11.bin from 10.1.4.2 to flash ...

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   8124000  c2500-js-l_112-19.bin
[8124064 bytes used, 264544 available, 8388608 total]
Accessing file 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' on 10.1.4.2... [failed]

%FLH: retry #1
%FLH: c2500-i-l.121-11.bin from 10.1.4.2 to flash ... (retry)

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   8124000  c2500-js-l_112-19.bin
[8124064 bytes used, 264544 available, 8388608 total]
Accessing file 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' on 10.1.4.2... [failed]

%FLH: Idling for 30 secs before retry #2
%FLH: c2500-i-l.121-11.bin from 10.1.4.2 to flash ... (retry)

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   8124000  c2500-js-l_112-19.bin
[8124064 bytes used, 264544 available, 8388608 total]
Accessing file 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' on 10.1.4.2... [failed]

%FLH: Flash download failed


I verified that the required IOS SW is actually in C2503's flash.  But how
come it is not accessible.  I can ping the serial interface of the C2503.

C2503sh flash

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   7972500  /c2500-i-l.121-11.bin
[7972564 bytes used, 416044 available, 8388608 total]
8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)
EA Louie wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  As a beginner, i am setting up home lab.  Can anyone give me
 the detail
  procedure of how to upgrade the IOS of C2521.
 
 I'm assuming you have the console connection to the routers. 
 I'm also
 assuming you have either learned to clear the passwords, or
 that you have
 enable (priveleged EXEC) access to the routers because you know
 the
 passwords.  So from priveleged EXEC mode (the prompt that looks
 like
 Router#, not Router)
 
 1.  use the s0 or s1 serial interface of the 2521 to connect to
 the 2503.
 (those are the high-speed serial interfaces)
 
 2.  set the clock rate to 400 (the clock rate will be set
 on the router
 with the DCE cable connected) - example
 configure terminal
 interface serial0
  clock rate 400
  no shutdown
 ^z  (control-z.  typing end also takes you out of configuration
 mode)
 
 3.  set an IP address on both serial interfaces to be in the
 same subnet,
 and enable the ethernet interface - example
 on the 2521 -
 config t
 interface serial 0
  ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
  end
 
 on the 2503 -
 config t
 interface serial 0
  ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
  no shut
 int e0
  ip addr 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
  no shut
 ^z
 
 4.  create a default route on the 2521 to the serial interface
 of the 2503 -
 example
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
 
 5.  ping the 2503 ethernet interface from the 2521 to verify
 connectivity -
 example, if the ethernet were set to 192.168.2.1
 ping 192.168.2.1
 
 6.  save the configuration on the 2521
 wr mem (or copy run start)
 
 7.  depending on where the IOS image resides,  you want to
 start up the tftp
 server on your PC, or set up your 2503 as a tftp server (if you
 want to use
 the image that resides on the 2503) - example
 on the 2503 -
 show flash
  (a filename will be displayed - perhaps something like
 c2500-d-l.120-9.bin)
 conf t
 tftp-server c2500-d-l.120-9.bin
 ^z
 
 8.  on the 2521,
 copy tftp flash
 
 at the prompt for the ip address, either use the ip address of
 the PC
 running the tftp software (it should be a 192.168.2.x address)
 or the serial
 interface of the 2503 if you're copying that image
 
 at the prompt for the source filename, use the filename that
 you used
 above - in this example, c2500-d-l.120-9.bin
 
 at the prompt for the destination filename, press enter
 
 for all the other prompts, press enter or y
 
 then watch the flash get erased on the 2521 and then watch the
 tftp transfer
 process with all of the exclamation points (!)
 
 When the image is finished tranferring, the 2521 will reload,
 because it
 runs its operating system from flash memory.
 
 Good luck, and have fun
 -e-
 
 
  I got no problem with my C2503 because it has a Ethernet port
 for me to
  connect the PC to it.
 
  Kenneth
 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at 

Re: Design Question - Spanning-tree Protocol. [7:23614]

2001-10-20 Thread EA Louie

 Hi Folks,
 I have a design in which Cisco 3548 XL's are GBIC-stacked on various
floors
 of a campus and are uplinked to a core Cat 6509 switch. The uplink from
 every floor stack is ether-channeled to the core via two parallel
equal-cost
 paths. One uplink path starts forwarding and the other goes into
 blocking mode from each floor stack.

 Here is my confusion... If only one link of a 400 MBps full-duplex
 ether-channel fails from the forwarding path , will it invoke
spanning-tree
 recalculation ??? Or will the 'now' sub-optimal path still remain in
 forwarding mode and the now more-bandwidth path remain in blocking mode
???


the 'suboptimal' path will continue until all the links fail.  At that
point, STP will detect the link failure and recalculate.

 Since spanning-tree recalculation causes a lot of ripples throughout the
 switched network, I would assume that the latter were true. However, I
would
 like to hear views from people who would think that the former scenario is
 more probable.

 Thanks very much.

 Aziz
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23626t=23614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: default-routes for eigrp?? [7:23581]

2001-10-20 Thread EA Louie

 Tried that...first on the border router thinking that it would inject a
 default route to the remote router..on the remote router shows as candiate
 route * But does not work..(This command works for RIP BTW)

The key concept here is HAS TO BE IN THE ROUTING TABLE.  Otherwise, the
default-network command merely injects a static route into your
configuration which is usually useless.  Thus, if the default route were out
of the 209.125.17.0 network, the statement
ip default-network 209.125.17.0
would allow that route in the routing table to be flagged as a candidate
default route, and would advertise that route to other eigrp routers.

[snip]

 Also here is the output of the sh ip route command on the ISP router for
the
 netw/ip that I am trying to ping on the remote router:
209.125.17.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
 B   209.125.17.1 [20/2297856] via 192.168.1.9, 21:19:27

 ISP#ping 209.125.17.1

 Type escape sequence to abort.
 Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 209.125.17.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
 .
 Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

There are two reasons for a ping failing.  The first one is obvious... no
path to the destination network.  What's the 2nd reason
that pings fail?


 What am I missing on the border router? Trace dies there
 Thanks for your help.
 Kind regards.




_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23627t=23581
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]

2001-10-20 Thread adam lee

I only read part of this e-mail but I noticed that you are having trouble
accessing the file.

Have you set up file sharing on the dir the flash is in?  I remember that
being a sticking point when I started flashing routers.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kenneth Yeung
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]


Louie,
Thank you in advance.  I understand your procedure.  That's sound logical to
me.  Really appreciate!
But the upgrade has some problem with the following error message:
Proceed? [confirm]

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   8124000  c2500-js-l_112-19.bin
[8124064 bytes used, 264544 available, 8388608 total]
Address or name of remote host [10.1.4.2]?
Source file name? c2500-i-l.121-11.bin
Destination file name [c2500-i-l.121-11.bin]?
Accessing file 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' on 10.1.4.2...
Loading c2500-i-l.121-11.bin from 10.1.4.2 (via Serial0): ! [OK]

Erase flash device before writing? [confirm]
Flash contains files. Are you sure you want to erase? [confirm]

Copy 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' from server
  as 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' into Flash WITH erase? [yes/no]yes

%SYS-5-RELOAD: Reload requested
%FLH: c2500-i-l.121-11.bin from 10.1.4.2 to flash ...

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   8124000  c2500-js-l_112-19.bin
[8124064 bytes used, 264544 available, 8388608 total]
Accessing file 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' on 10.1.4.2... [failed]

%FLH: retry #1
%FLH: c2500-i-l.121-11.bin from 10.1.4.2 to flash ... (retry)

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   8124000  c2500-js-l_112-19.bin
[8124064 bytes used, 264544 available, 8388608 total]
Accessing file 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' on 10.1.4.2... [failed]

%FLH: Idling for 30 secs before retry #2
%FLH: c2500-i-l.121-11.bin from 10.1.4.2 to flash ... (retry)

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   8124000  c2500-js-l_112-19.bin
[8124064 bytes used, 264544 available, 8388608 total]
Accessing file 'c2500-i-l.121-11.bin' on 10.1.4.2... [failed]

%FLH: Flash download failed


I verified that the required IOS SW is actually in C2503's flash.  But how
come it is not accessible.  I can ping the serial interface of the C2503.

C2503sh flash

System flash directory:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   7972500  /c2500-i-l.121-11.bin
[7972564 bytes used, 416044 available, 8388608 total]
8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)
EA Louie wrote:

  Hi all,
  As a beginner, i am setting up home lab.  Can anyone give me
 the detail
  procedure of how to upgrade the IOS of C2521.

 I'm assuming you have the console connection to the routers.
 I'm also
 assuming you have either learned to clear the passwords, or
 that you have
 enable (priveleged EXEC) access to the routers because you know
 the
 passwords.  So from priveleged EXEC mode (the prompt that looks
 like
 Router#, not Router)

 1.  use the s0 or s1 serial interface of the 2521 to connect to
 the 2503.
 (those are the high-speed serial interfaces)

 2.  set the clock rate to 400 (the clock rate will be set
 on the router
 with the DCE cable connected) - example
 configure terminal
 interface serial0
  clock rate 400
  no shutdown
 ^z  (control-z.  typing end also takes you out of configuration
 mode)

 3.  set an IP address on both serial interfaces to be in the
 same subnet,
 and enable the ethernet interface - example
 on the 2521 -
 config t
 interface serial 0
  ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
  end

 on the 2503 -
 config t
 interface serial 0
  ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
  no shut
 int e0
  ip addr 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
  no shut
 ^z

 4.  create a default route on the 2521 to the serial interface
 of the 2503 -
 example
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2

 5.  ping the 2503 ethernet interface from the 2521 to verify
 connectivity -
 example, if the ethernet were set to 192.168.2.1
 ping 192.168.2.1

 6.  save the configuration on the 2521
 wr mem (or copy run start)

 7.  depending on where the IOS image resides,  you want to
 start up the tftp
 server on your PC, or set up your 2503 as a tftp server (if you
 want to use
 the image that resides on the 2503) - example
 on the 2503 -
 show flash
  (a filename will be displayed - perhaps something like
 c2500-d-l.120-9.bin)
 conf t
 tftp-server c2500-d-l.120-9.bin
 ^z

 8.  on the 2521,
 copy tftp flash

 at the prompt for the ip address, either use the ip address of
 the PC
 running the tftp software (it should be a 192.168.2.x address)
 or the serial
 interface of the 2503 if you're copying that image

 at the prompt for the source filename, use the filename that
 you used
 above - in this example, c2500-d-l.120-9.bin

 at the prompt for the destination filename, press enter

 for all the other prompts, press enter or y

 then watch the flash get erased on the 2521 and then watch the
 tftp transfer
 process 

Re: CAT 2948G (L2) vs. CAT3548-XL [7:23563]

2001-10-20 Thread td

Hi,
I have bought them both and their is fine line between them.  The 2948G is a
CAT based os where is the 3548XL is an IOS based.
This is how I use them:
1.  For the closet:  I used the 3548/3524xl and cascading them together
2.  For small, medium servers I used the 2948G (DMZ ...)
3.  For server farm I used 6509

Personnaly, I like the 2948G better.  The only reason the I used 3548
because it is cascadable and can be managed as a cluster. But it turns out
it has its own complexity when you need to replace a bad one in the chain.
Another thing on the 3548G is that eventhough it supports more than 200
vlans; this is only in the case of transparent configuration.  If you do
client/server, it support upto 64 VLANs then It will switch to transparent
if more VLAN is defined.  The 35xx however, has a model that support inline
power for IP phone if you ever have a need for it.  I think the model is
35xx-pwr

With the new 2980G, it looks more and more attractive for the CAT based
system.  I 'm seriouly looking at the 2980G currently.  Note that the 2948
and 2980G use the chipset of the 4000 series switches.

Hope this help.
Cheers,
TD

Thomas  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi All,

 I saw an ads with Cisco CAT 2948G Layer 2 switch that has a price almost
the
 same as the Cisco CAT 3548-EN-XL.  Based on the discription, It seems that
 the 2948G running CATOS, while 3548s running IOS.  Also, 2948G has a
better
 speed of up to 24Gbps whereas the 3548s only up to 10.8Gbps.  Assuming
they
 both are at the same price, which should I choose? I am also considering
the
 QoS on the switch to support VoIP.  Does 2948G support the same features
as
 3548XL as well?  We are using many of 3548s at the HQ and like to buy
Cisco
 CAT for remote offices.  Also, Is 2948G in End of Life or End of
 Support?  Cisco just came out a new 2980G that is same as 2948G but has
80
 10/100 ports.

 Thomas N.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23629t=23563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IPSec and IKE [7:23599]

2001-10-20 Thread Keyur Shah

In a nutshell,

IPSEC is encryption methodology open standard. IPSEC SAs can be configured
using IKE or manual keying. IKE saves time and manual work in hub and spoke
configurations. It is an algorithm that uses policy to determine matching
parameters with the other side. In absence of IKE, you would have to
configure each parameter manually on all participating routers and clients.

IKE is called phase I negotiation, which ensures that peer is who it says it
is.

 -Keyur Shah-
CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching)
CSS1,CCNA,CCDA,SCSA,SCNA,MCT,MCSE,MCP+I,MCP,CNI,MCNE,CNE,CNA
Hello Computers
Say Hello to Your Future!
http://www.hellocomputers.com
Toll-Free: 1.877.794.3556
International: 1.510.795.6815
Eurpoe: +(44)20 7900 3011
Fax: 1.510.291.2250




-Original Message-
From: Hunt Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 6:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPSec and IKE [7:23599]


Can anyone please explain to me what is the difference between IPSec and
IKE? I understand that IP Sec is just IP Security, which provides IP network
layer encryption and authentication to end-to-end security on an
infrastructure, but what's IKE?  I read the Cisco MCNS book from Chapter 15
to 17 many times, yet I'm still very confused.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,
Hunt




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23630t=23599
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ADSL/BVI problems solved! [7:23631]

2001-10-20 Thread Ben Hockenhull

I finally got it through my thick head that it was a *bridged* connection,
and set up IRB.

Sure enough, I was then able to ping the next hop address with packets
sourced from the public IP I was given.  However, I seem to be unable to
hit anything outside that particular subnet, and I'm not sure why.  If I
try and ping www.yahoo.com, for instance, I get no response.  This is true
if I ping from the internal network (and thus NAT) or if I ping sourced
from the BVI interface (avoiding NAT).

After much experimentation and much frustration, I finally solved the
problem with my BVI interface.  It turns out that removing the default
route pointing at the BVI1 interface and replacing it with a default route
pointing at the next-hop IP address fixed the problem.

I'm not totally clear on why this made a difference, but it did.  As soon
as that change was made, I could reach the IP assigned to the BVI interface
from hosts out in the world, and general connectivity was enabled.  Wild.

If someone can explain to me why a next-hop static route vs an interface
static route made a difference, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks

Ben




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23631t=23631
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Network and Broadcast address [7:23632]

2001-10-20 Thread Hunt Lee

It would be great if someone can give me a hand on this:  I know how to
calculate the number of subents and number of hosts per subent, but I'm
very confused about the Network address and the Broadcast address:

Say I have a network:  100.10.0.0 255.255.255.192:

1)  To work out the subnet:

100.10.0.0 is a Class A, so = /8

255.255.255.192 = /26

Therefore, /26 - /8 = /14,

The number of subnets = 2^14-2= 16382

2)  To work out the number of host:

/32 - /26 = /6

The number of hosts = 2^6-2 = 62 hosts per subnets


Thanks so much for your help in advance.

Best Regards,
Hunt Lee




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23632t=23632
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Network and Broadcast address [7:23632]

2001-10-20 Thread Hunt Lee

so = /18 = 2^18 - 2

Number of subnet is 262142.


Hunt Lee wrote:

 It would be great if someone can give me a hand on this:  I know how to
 calculate the number of subents and number of hosts per subent, but I'm
 very confused about the Network address and the Broadcast address:

 Say I have a network:  100.10.0.0 255.255.255.192:

 1)  To work out the subnet:

 100.10.0.0 is a Class A, so = /8

 255.255.255.192 = /26

 Therefore, /26 - /8 = /14,

 The number of subnets = 2^14-2= 16382

 2)  To work out the number of host:

 /32 - /26 = /6

 The number of hosts = 2^6-2 = 62 hosts per subnets

 Thanks so much for your help in advance.

 Best Regards,
 Hunt Lee




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23633t=23632
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Load Balancing Via BGP [7:23478]

2001-10-20 Thread Wojtek Zlobicki

 it means a down-link , it receives data but can
 transmit data

 thanks for your reply

Is this to be can or can't ?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23635t=23478
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ADSL/BVI problems solved! [7:23631]

2001-10-20 Thread Wojtek Zlobicki

 After much experimentation and much frustration, I finally solved the
 problem with my BVI interface.  It turns out that removing the default
 route pointing at the BVI1 interface and replacing it with a default route
 pointing at the next-hop IP address fixed the problem.

How does your router know where to route traffic ?  The default route was
pointing
to x.x.x.26 (when the traffic got there, it knew not where to go).  At the
next hop, whatever device was there, used its routing table to forward
traffic further.


 I'm not totally clear on why this made a difference, but it did.  As soon
 as that change was made, I could reach the IP assigned to the BVI
interface
 from hosts out in the world, and general connectivity was enabled.  Wild.

Routing, its a beautiful thing :)

 If someone can explain to me why a next-hop static route vs an interface
 static route made a difference, I'd appreciate it.

.26 did not have a routing table (it was you).  Had .26 been another router
on the network, it would have worked fine.

BTW (what was the next hop , .25 ?)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23634t=23631
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Load Balancing Via BGP [7:23478]

2001-10-20 Thread Wojtek Zlobicki

I was under the impression that BGP did not work on unidirectional links.
Can someone correct me if I'm wrong ?

 hi ,

 I am currently running on 2 fibre links to two
 different providers . The utilisation of these two
 links are getting very high and they are getting
 congested . I am thinking of purchasing a satellite
 Receive-only link from another provider .

 My question is , how am I going to do load-balancing
 using BGP on this Receive-only link ?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23636t=23478
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Design Question - Spanning-tree Protocol. [7:23614]

2001-10-20 Thread Henry D.

Hmm, I think your STP/EtherChannel might be misconfigured. EtherChannel
should be
treated as a single logical link. With an STP running on top of it your both
links
should be forwarding. So in case one of the physical links fails, there is
no
need to re-calculate anything with STP.
Are you sure they are configured for etherchannel and not just trunking ?


Urooj's Hi-speed Internet  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi Folks,
 I have a design in which Cisco 3548 XL's are GBIC-stacked on various
floors
 of a campus and are uplinked to a core Cat 6509 switch. The uplink from
 every floor stack is ether-channeled to the core via two parallel
equal-cost
 paths. One uplink path starts forwarding and the other goes into
 blocking mode from each floor stack.

 Here is my confusion... If only one link of a 400 MBps full-duplex
 ether-channel fails from the forwarding path , will it invoke
spanning-tree
 recalculation ??? Or will the 'now' sub-optimal path still remain in
 forwarding mode and the now more-bandwidth path remain in blocking mode
???

 Since spanning-tree recalculation causes a lot of ripples throughout the
 switched network, I would assume that the latter were true. However, I
would
 like to hear views from people who would think that the former scenario is
 more probable.

 Thanks very much.

 Aziz




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23637t=23614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: which books in better for support 2.0?? [7:18577]

2001-10-20 Thread Arnaldo Gomez

I have obtained my CCNA  CCNP with all of the Cisco press books. Yes I did
use the all of the Certification guides for all my studies. Yes they are
very good, but a bit cryptic. It did take me several reads before
understanding it. But once I understood it, stuck in my head. Now whenever I
needed clarity I did turn to the course books that parallels the cert
guides. I suggest read and study out of the cert guides and reference the
courseware books. I only say that because it worked for me. But you must
find your own books, and formula for your studies that works best for you.

good luck.


Sharon Kantan  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Dear friends,

 I am going for the support 2.0 exam. May I know which book is better? is
 that 1)Cisco Internetwork Troubleshooting ISBN: 1578700922 or 2)Cisco CCNP
 Support Exam Certification Guide ISBN: 0735709955


 Besides, may I know which book is better for routing 2.0?  is that
Building
 scalable cisco networks published by CISCO or the one published by
Sybex.??

 Please advise



 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23638t=18577
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reading the show int token ring command [7:23640]

2001-10-20 Thread Dennis Laganiere

I just wanted to double-check myself.  The line #9 from the following show
interface token-ring 0 output says...

1.) TokenRing 0 is up, line protocol is up
2.) Hardware is Dual Token Ring, address is .3080.5fca (bia
.3080.5fca)
3.) Internet address is 1.0.0.7, subnet mask is 255.0.0.0
4.) MTU 8136 bytes, BW 4000 Kbit, DLY 630 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255
5.) Encapsulation SNAP, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec)
6.) ARP type:  SNAP, ARP Timeout 4:00:00
7.) Ring speed:  16 Mbps
8.) Single ring node, Source Route Transparent Bridge capable
9.) Source bridging enable, srn 1 bn 2 trn 1000 (ring group)
10.) Proxy explorers disable, spanning explorer enabled, NetBIOS cache
disable
11.) Group Address:  0x, Functional Address:  0x011A


local ring number - 1
bridge number - 2
ring group - 1000

Right?

--- Dennis




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23640t=23640
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IPExpert Lab Study Guide Feedback [7:23425]

2001-10-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The solutionexpert site referred in Paul's email is called SolutionLabs.

The website is located at www.solutionlabs.com .

--- - ---



Paul Jin  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I will post what I asked chuck about it earlier.. if you have not
 seen it yet.
 -

 Author: Chuck Larrieu (Mailing List Post)
 Date:   10-18-01 10:53

 there are several good sources for Lab prep material now.

 NLI / Bootcamp, Fatkid, and the one sold through Cert Zone.

 NLI is comprehensive. Their older Labs contain a lot of obsolete material,
 but this does not diminish their value. NLI would like you to rent rack
time
 from them, but many of their labs can be done in a typical home lab.

 Fat Kid Labs seem to be more topic specific, rather than comprehensive in
 nature. But they are worth looking at. Fat Kid has very reasonable rental
 rates, but most of their stuff can be done at home.

 IP Xpert builds their labs around a large pod, and their model is that
they
 rent you rack time at reasonable rates to do their labs. One can jigger
the
 setup, and get a lot of the stuff done on a home lab.

 It comes down to where you want to spend your dollars. In terms of cost,
Fat
 Kid is the least expensive and NLI is the most expensive. But the cost of
 the study material is about that of a 2501 on an auction site. Your cost
for
 setting up a home lab will be far and away more expensive than any
materials
 you buy. These days, the study materials available are excellent. the
major
 differences between NLI and IP Xpert are in the presentation ( several
 sheets stapled together versus a nicely bound book ) the presence or
absence
 of obsolete topics ( NLI has been around a lot longer, and has legacy
 material which can be skipped ) some cosmetic presentation things like
color
 diagrams nicely done on Visio versus hand sketched.

 Seems to me I'm forgetting somebody. Solutions Experts or something? I'll
 have to dig around.

 Oh yeah, and Vlab.

 HTH

 Chuck

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Paul Jin
 Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 7:42 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Off Topic - CCIE Lab Prep recommendation [7:23091]


 Chuck,
 So in your opinion, you do believe that this is one of the better
 labs and complex enough that it will help you deal with the real
 lab???



 Paul




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23641t=23425
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]

2001-10-20 Thread Kenneth Yeung

Hi all,
Some findings.  The problem is on the C2521.  I can successfully upgrade
another C2521 with the same method.  I tried to wr erase and reload before I
perform the upgrade on these routers.
So the issue is: What is the problem with this C2521?  Any suggestion?

Routersh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 11.2(19), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Wed 07-Jul-99 16:49 by jaturner
Image text-base: 0x030402C4, data-base: 0x1000

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE
BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-RXBOOT), Version 10.2(8a), RELEASE
SOFTW
ARE (fc1)

Router uptime is 4 minutes
System restarted by power-on
System image file is flash:c2500-js-l_112-19.bin, booted via flash

cisco 2521 (68030) processor (revision K) with 14336K/2048K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID 03856704, with hardware revision 0002
Bridging software.
SuperLAT software copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant.
TN3270 Emulation software.
Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.0.
1 Token Ring/IEEE 802.5 interface(s)
2 Serial network interface(s)
2 Low-speed serial(sync/async) network interface(s)
1 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s)
32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)

Configuration register is 0x2142


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23642t=23498
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Network and Broadcast address [7:23632]

2001-10-20 Thread nrf

And if you are allowing IP subnet-zero, then you have subnets=(2^18)-1 or
262143 subnets.

As far as network and broadcast addresses are concerned:

For your example of 10.100.0.0/26, the network address is 10.100.0.0, and
the broadcast address is 10.100.0.63

Don't even get me started on the new feature available in 12.2(T) where you
can use /31 networks.










Hunt Lee  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 so = /18 = 2^18 - 2

 Number of subnet is 262142.


 Hunt Lee wrote:

  It would be great if someone can give me a hand on this:  I know how to
  calculate the number of subents and number of hosts per subent, but I'm
  very confused about the Network address and the Broadcast address:
 
  Say I have a network:  100.10.0.0 255.255.255.192:
 
  1)  To work out the subnet:
 
  100.10.0.0 is a Class A, so = /8
 
  255.255.255.192 = /26
 
  Therefore, /26 - /8 = /14,
 
  The number of subnets = 2^14-2= 16382
 
  2)  To work out the number of host:
 
  /32 - /26 = /6
 
  The number of hosts = 2^6-2 = 62 hosts per subnets
 
  Thanks so much for your help in advance.
 
  Best Regards,
  Hunt Lee




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23643t=23632
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: LDAP Question [7:23519]

2001-10-20 Thread nrf

Just make sure you're not blocking out TCP port 389, and you're cool.










Kent Hundley  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 No.  Unless your have things like access-lists, policy-based routing, etc.
 configured the router will not know or care about anything above layer 3.
 i.e. It will only care about IP addresses and IP layer information.
(correct
 checksum, correct MTU, etc)

 HTH,
 Kent

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Wright, Jeremy
 Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:26 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: LDAP Question [7:23519]


 Are there any special configurations on a router to allow LDAP out over my
 WAN? Thanks for any input...




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23644t=23519
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Cisco Power Adapter Recall [7:23645]

2001-10-20 Thread Brad Ellis

See below:

http://www.safetyalerts.com/recall/p/014/01270.htm

The power adapters were shipped with the following ADSL routers:

Cisco 827
Cisco 827-4V
Cisco 826

Cisco SOHO77
Cisco SOHO77-50
Cisco 827-EUR

FYI

-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796
Network Learning Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
used Cisco:  www.optsys.net




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23645t=23645
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]

2001-10-20 Thread Daniel Cotts

Well the image on the 2503 is good. Both routers use the same Flash. Swap
the flash SIMMs and see what happens.
Also check on CCO for bootroms for the 2500 series. I seem to remember that
the latest roms work in all 2500s. Might be worth updating them. Cisco just
charges for shipping. Check the archives for exactly what is the telephone
number to call. 

 -Original Message-
 From: Kenneth Yeung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 9:29 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]
 
 
 Hi all,
 Some findings.  The problem is on the C2521.  I can 
 successfully upgrade
 another C2521 with the same method.  I tried to wr erase and 
 reload before I
 perform the upgrade on these routers.
 So the issue is: What is the problem with this C2521?  Any suggestion?
 
 Routersh ver
 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
 IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 11.2(19), 
 RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
 Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc.
 Compiled Wed 07-Jul-99 16:49 by jaturner
 Image text-base: 0x030402C4, data-base: 0x1000
 
 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE
 BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-RXBOOT), Version 
 10.2(8a), RELEASE
 SOFTW
 ARE (fc1)
 
 Router uptime is 4 minutes
 System restarted by power-on
 System image file is flash:c2500-js-l_112-19.bin, booted via flash
 
 cisco 2521 (68030) processor (revision K) with 14336K/2048K 
 bytes of memory.
 Processor board ID 03856704, with hardware revision 0002
 Bridging software.
 SuperLAT software copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
 X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant.
 TN3270 Emulation software.
 Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.0.
 1 Token Ring/IEEE 802.5 interface(s)
 2 Serial network interface(s)
 2 Low-speed serial(sync/async) network interface(s)
 1 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s)
 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)
 
 Configuration register is 0x2142




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23646t=23498
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Network and Broadcast address [7:23632]

2001-10-20 Thread Wojtek Zlobicki

 And if you are allowing IP subnet-zero, then you have subnets=(2^18)-1 or
 262143 subnets.

Does ip subnet zero also not allow an all ones subnet , making the total
262144 (can't remember in which IOS this started becoming possible)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23647t=23632
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Doyle Chap:14 Config Q.1 [7:23648]

2001-10-20 Thread IT Guy

Hi everybody,

Is any can help me to understand how we can use this acl

172.16.1.0 0.0.0.127

to represent range of addresses from 172.16.1.0/28 to 172.16.1.128/28??and 
similarly
172.16.1.128 0.0.0.127 to represent..

172.16.1.128/28 to 172.16.1.240/28 ???

Thanks for help.







_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23648t=23648
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CAT 2948G (L2) vs. CAT3548-XL [7:23563]

2001-10-20 Thread Thomas

Yes, 3524-PWR support in-line power for IP phone; but it is the only model
with in-line power.

For 3500XL and 2900XL, they run on IOS, which is similar to that on routers.
They also have QoS features for VoIP, etc...  I wonder if I can implement
these QoS features on CATOS of 2948G for VoIP?

2948G doesn't support cluster; but with the 2 Giga uplink ports, should I be
able to stack them together just like 3548s?

Does 2948G become End of Life or End of Support soon?

Thanks!


td  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,
 I have bought them both and their is fine line between them.  The 2948G is
a
 CAT based os where is the 3548XL is an IOS based.
 This is how I use them:
 1.  For the closet:  I used the 3548/3524xl and cascading them together
 2.  For small, medium servers I used the 2948G (DMZ ...)
 3.  For server farm I used 6509

 Personnaly, I like the 2948G better.  The only reason the I used 3548
 because it is cascadable and can be managed as a cluster. But it turns out
 it has its own complexity when you need to replace a bad one in the chain.
 Another thing on the 3548G is that eventhough it supports more than 200
 vlans; this is only in the case of transparent configuration.  If you do
 client/server, it support upto 64 VLANs then It will switch to transparent
 if more VLAN is defined.  The 35xx however, has a model that support
inline
 power for IP phone if you ever have a need for it.  I think the model is
 35xx-pwr

 With the new 2980G, it looks more and more attractive for the CAT based
 system.  I 'm seriouly looking at the 2980G currently.  Note that the 2948
 and 2980G use the chipset of the 4000 series switches.

 Hope this help.
 Cheers,
 TD

 Thomas  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Hi All,
 
  I saw an ads with Cisco CAT 2948G Layer 2 switch that has a price almost
 the
  same as the Cisco CAT 3548-EN-XL.  Based on the discription, It seems
that
  the 2948G running CATOS, while 3548s running IOS.  Also, 2948G has a
 better
  speed of up to 24Gbps whereas the 3548s only up to 10.8Gbps.  Assuming
 they
  both are at the same price, which should I choose? I am also considering
 the
  QoS on the switch to support VoIP.  Does 2948G support the same features
 as
  3548XL as well?  We are using many of 3548s at the HQ and like to buy
 Cisco
  CAT for remote offices.  Also, Is 2948G in End of Life or End of
  Support?  Cisco just came out a new 2980G that is same as 2948G but has
 80
  10/100 ports.
 
  Thomas N.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23649t=23563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Load Balancing Via BGP [7:23478]

2001-10-20 Thread suaveguru

you are right but I have a terrestrial return path for
the return traffic so BGP TCP connection can be
established


regards,
suaveguru
--- Wojtek Zlobicki  wrote:
 I was under the impression that BGP did not work on
 unidirectional links.
 Can someone correct me if I'm wrong ?
 
  hi ,
 
  I am currently running on 2 fibre links to two
  different providers . The utilisation of these two
  links are getting very high and they are getting
  congested . I am thinking of purchasing a
 satellite
  Receive-only link from another provider .
 
  My question is , how am I going to do
 load-balancing
  using BGP on this Receive-only link ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23650t=23478
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: EIGRP load balancing - variance command [7:23623]

2001-10-20 Thread Thomas

In this scenario, I don't know why you use 128 for variance value.  In
short, you choose a value of variance such that this value multiplies by the
best path should be GREATER than the alternate path you like to load
balancing.

For this scenario, the bandwidth on R1-R2-R4 path is 3000K, bandwidth on
R1-R3-R4 path is 1544K.  Using a variance of 2 should load balance between
the 2 paths.

1544k x 23000k

Thomas N.


kwock99  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I have tried some basic testing on the EIGRP load balancing. For
simplicity,
 I only set up 4 router in order to get equal cost load balancing.


 LANA**R1 --R2 --R4  LANB
||
   --R3

 ***: Ethernet
 : Wan

 If I use the default setting for the bandwidth and delay, I can get two
 route from LAN A to LANB.

 R1--R2--R4
 R1--R3--R4

 After I changed all the bandwidth of serial interface of R1, R2, R4 to
 3000Kbit (default is 1544kbit), I cannot get two route to LAN B, only the
 best route appears (R1--R2--R4). It is normal.

 I key in the variance 128 command in R1 in order to get two route, but
it
 failed. The parameter 128 is make sure that the R1 will take any alternate
 route to LAN B because the metric of R1--R3--R4 must be less than 128 *
 (metric of R1--R2--R4).

 Anyone have the idea? Thanks.

 Francis




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23651t=23623
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Load Balancing Via BGP [7:23478]

2001-10-20 Thread suaveguru

sorry it should be can't


--- Wojtek Zlobicki  wrote:
  it means a down-link , it receives data but can
  transmit data
 
  thanks for your reply
 
 Is this to be can or can't ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23652t=23478
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Network and Broadcast address [7:23632]

2001-10-20 Thread nrf

Wojtek Zlobicki  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  And if you are allowing IP subnet-zero, then you have subnets=(2^18)-1
or
  262143 subnets.

 Does ip subnet zero also not allow an all ones subnet , making the total
 262144 (can't remember in which IOS this started becoming possible)

No, IP subnet-zero does not allow this capability.   On a Cisco router,
you are always allowed to use the all-ones subnet.  IP subnet-zero  has
nothing at all to do with the all-ones subnet.  You can prove this to
yourself by firing up a router and creating a loopback address  that has an
all-ones subnet address, while alternatively turning on and turning off IP
subnet-zero, and you will find that it makes absolutely no difference
whether it's on or off.

The big problem with using the all-ones subnet is that there is the
opportunity for great confusion as to whether a packet sent to the broadcast
address is meant for just the subnetted network or for the entire classful
network. This is why it is generally held that the all-ones subnet should
not be used, and this is why basic networking texts do not count the
all-ones subnet as a valid subnet.   But if you really find youself in a jam
because you're running out of  addresses, and you use great caution, you
could in theory fire up the all-ones subnet.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23653t=23632
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]

2001-10-20 Thread EA Louie

what kind of error message are you getting?  I'm willing to venture that
you're trying to load an image that is larger than 8192K (8M) bytes and
that's causing the download error.   Paste the error message into a reply
and let us know.

- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Yeung 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 7:28 PM
Subject: RE: How to upgrade the IOS of C2521?! [7:23498]


 Hi all,
 Some findings.  The problem is on the C2521.  I can successfully upgrade
 another C2521 with the same method.  I tried to wr erase and reload before
I
 perform the upgrade on these routers.
 So the issue is: What is the problem with this C2521?  Any suggestion?

 Routersh ver
 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
 IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 11.2(19), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
 Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc.
 Compiled Wed 07-Jul-99 16:49 by jaturner
 Image text-base: 0x030402C4, data-base: 0x1000

 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE
 BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-RXBOOT), Version 10.2(8a), RELEASE
 SOFTW
 ARE (fc1)

 Router uptime is 4 minutes
 System restarted by power-on
 System image file is flash:c2500-js-l_112-19.bin, booted via flash

 cisco 2521 (68030) processor (revision K) with 14336K/2048K bytes of
memory.
 Processor board ID 03856704, with hardware revision 0002
 Bridging software.
 SuperLAT software copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
 X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant.
 TN3270 Emulation software.
 Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.0.
 1 Token Ring/IEEE 802.5 interface(s)
 2 Serial network interface(s)
 2 Low-speed serial(sync/async) network interface(s)
 1 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s)
 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)

 Configuration register is 0x2142
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23654t=23498
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ospf point-to-multipoint [7:23655]

2001-10-20 Thread Jim Bond

Hello,

On Jeff Doyle's TCP/IP volume I, P417 it says
point-to-multipoint is multicast; P433 it says it's
unicast. Which one is correct?

Thanks in advance.

Jim

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23655t=23655
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]