Re: Which domain registration company is the cheapest? [7:32622]
of the customers that www.happycomputer.net has are using them. WW wrote: >THe company should also provide DNS services and can have MX record for me Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32622&t=32622 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: 99% CPU Utilisation with ethernet disconnected [7:32621]
IOS is my guess... kinda same wierd thing happened to me thursday night with a 3640 and 12.2super slooow. rolled back to 12.1 and all was good again Gaz wrote: >Hi all, > >This is not really a problem, just curious and not been able to find a >reason for it. > >I went to a site yesterday which ran 3DES on a 2650 with VPN module with >just serial and fast ethernet. The firewall connected to the fast ethernet >had been disconnected ready for me to move the router. I noticed that it >took a while to accept the password, and around a minute for write mem, so I >did a sho proc cpu. >CPU was running constantly at 99%, although looking through the detail there >was only around 35% in total. It was almost all in IP input. >I put no keepalive on the fast ethernet and cpu utilisation went straight >down to 1%. > >Didn't have time to check what traffic was going on. > >Anybody have any explanation? > >Cheers, > >Gaz > >CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/65%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: >99% > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process > 12920 3767046 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Load Meter > 2 423173 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 PPP auth > 3 7669232 2230284 3438 0.00% 0.03% 0.02% 0 Check heaps > 4 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Chunk Manager > 5 821380 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Pool Manager > 6 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Timers > 75012 12621397 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Serial Backgroun > 86831 3765897 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ALARM_TRIGGER_SC > 9 356627773 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Environmental mo > 10 753315430 2 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ARP Input > 11 025 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 DDR Timers > 12 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Dialer event > 13 0 4 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Entity MIB API > 14 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 SERIAL A'detect > 15 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Critical Bkgnd > 16 135559 2095603 64 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Background > 17 8 953 8 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Logger > 18 31610 18804830 1 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0 TTY Background > 19 16334 18805051 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Per-Second Jobs > 20 4 2 2000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Hawkeye Backgrou > 213278 1354 2420 0.00% 0.12% 0.35% 0 Exec > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process > 22 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 HDV background > 23 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 VNM DSPRM MAIN > 24 042 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Input > 254407 3767048 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Compute load avg > 26 6294136314153 20035 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% 0 Per-minute Jobs > 27 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 CES Line Conditi > 29 129535685967188 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ecaimLoPri > 3013206273 2500683 5281 34.77% 33.20% 32.77% 0 IP Input > 31 6215447 2353531 2640 0.08% 0.03% 0.00% 0 CDP Protocol Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32621&t=32621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Flipping the switch is it... I always think of its file system as it is "in the flash" not as vulnerable as a hard drive... we just unplug hubs/switches/routers... Thank goodness to. Can you imagine routers getting as pissed off as NT boxes when "improperly" shut down... we be going nuts.. Richard Tufaro wrote: >What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but shutdown? Just >flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me. > >Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA >Network Engineer - Anda Inc. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32620&t=32591 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Security Advice [7:32619]
Has anyone taken the CCIE Security written qualification exam? What study materials and books are recommended? If anyone has taken the lab I would appreciate any feedback. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32619&t=32619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CSPFA Exam question [7:32390]
I just took the test. You need to be familiar with PIX Monitor mode which can be used to upgrade the software and reset the password. I would say there are at max only one or two questions regarding this subject. Also some odd commands. Read the book in detail. A good amount of questions on Firewall IOS, CBAC configuration, and Firewall IPSEC -Original Message- From: Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CSPFA Exam question [7:32390] I am currently studying for the PIX exam. I am using Cisco's exam outline as a guide. The outline does not mention 'upgrading OS versions' as a topic on the exam, yet it is clearly covered in the book at some length. Is the outline correct? Just checking... Thanks, Robert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32618&t=32390 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Have CCNA v1. Want to move onto CCNP. [7:32569]
Thanks for the info! much appreciated. That gives me plenty of time to complete CCNP :) Cheers, MrSpiffy ""George Murphy CCNP/DP"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > MrSpiffy, Good news!, the CCNA is good for 3 years instead of 2. My > certificate from Cisco states valid through September 16 2003 and I > passed the exam in 2000. If you were in the undertaking of CCNP and your > CCNA expires then you would have to re-cert CCNA Get the > CCNP and you will just need to pass the re-cert exam on that from here > on out.. > > MrSpiffy wrote: > > >Hi, I have CCNA v1.0 (I've have had it for around 1.5 yrs). I was wanting to > >move onto CCNP. I've been on the cisco site and it mentions the fact that I > >require a current valid CCNA to move onto the CCNP track. I have a few > >questions: > > > >1. When will my CCNA expire? Im guessing in 6 months time as I once heard > >that CCNA is valid for 2 yrs. > > > >2. If my CCNA expires in 6 months does this mean I have to complete any one > >of the CCNP modules within the next 6 months for me to still be allowed to > >go for CCNP without having to do CCNA v2? Or does it mean i have to complete > >all 4 CCNP exams within the next 6 months prior to my CCNA expiring? i.e. > >just wondering what happens if my CCNA expires whilst im undertaking CCNP. > > > >Thanks for your help! > >Cheers, > >MrSpiffy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32617&t=32569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for study partners in Atlanta,GA [7:32615]
Anyone interested in forming a study group? I would like to get a group together to study for CCNP and CCIE exams. Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32615&t=32615 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: PATS RULE! (EOM) [7:32614]
-- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written [7:32575]
James.. Congratulations on passing the IE written... i finished my NP 2 months ago and now working toward for the IE...you make it sound easy like you dont need to study more for the IE writtenIs it true? how much time do you spent for the study? or do you have years of experience with cisco devices? Thanks Ardi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32613&t=32575 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to make Serial 0 up/up without connecting [7:32410]
What is ethernet I/F ? - Original Message - From: "Engelhard M. Labiro" To: Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:26 AM Subject: Re: How to make Serial 0 up/up without connecting [7:32410] > Use "loopback" command at the serial interface mode. > For ethernet I/F, use "no keepalive" command. > > > Could someone help me this : > > > > Configure Serial interface up/up without a cable connecting to it... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32611&t=32410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Catalyst 5000 vs. Catalyst 1201 for CCNP home lab [7:32606]
I don't think a 1201 would be a good platform. A 2901 on the other hand would be perfect as long as you can get the images you want to run loaded. I don't think the newer features for the Cat5k would be critical in CCNP or CCIE prep. Darrell Colin wrote: > > Hi, > > I am studying for my CCNP and getting together a list for equipment for > a home lab. I want to purchase a Cat 5xxx but have heard that Cat > 1201's is very "similar" to the Cat 5xxx. Would I be better of getting > a 1201 (which is a lot cheaper than a Cat 5xxx)? Or should I spend the $ > and get a Cat 5xxx? > > Thanks > > Colin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32608&t=32606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stupid Question [7:32591]
That leads me to a related question... would it be better for my stack of 2500's and Cat switches to leave them on, or should I shut them off when not used. This is a lab setup. Jeff ""Richard Tufaro"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but shutdown? Just > flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me. > > Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA > Network Engineer - Anda Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32607&t=32591 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst 5000 vs. Catalyst 1201 for CCNP home lab [7:32606]
Hi, I am studying for my CCNP and getting together a list for equipment for a home lab. I want to purchase a Cat 5xxx but have heard that Cat 1201's is very "similar" to the Cat 5xxx. Would I be better of getting a 1201 (which is a lot cheaper than a Cat 5xxx)? Or should I spend the $ and get a Cat 5xxx? Thanks Colin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32606&t=32606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Study Partner Sacramento CA Area [7:32605]
Hi, I am looking for one or more CCNP study partner(s)in the Sacramento area. If you are interested, Please contact me offline @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Colin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32605&t=32605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 99% CPU Utilisation with ethernet disconnected [7:32599]
Gaz, The way the CPU utilization is calculated for your "show proc cpu" is 99% - 65% = 34%. The 34% is "IP Input" as you stated. The other "missing" 65% is interrupts to the CPU. There really isn't a way to find out exactly what is causing the interrupts to the CPU but since "IP Input" is so high it would be safe to say that it has something to do with packet processing (i.e. fast switching). Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 5G Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ""Gaz"" wrote: > Hi all, > > This is not really a problem, just curious and not been able to find a > reason for it. > > I went to a site yesterday which ran 3DES on a 2650 with VPN module with > just serial and fast ethernet. The firewall connected to the fast ethernet > had been disconnected ready for me to move the router. I noticed that it > took a while to accept the password, and around a minute for write mem, so I > did a sho proc cpu. > CPU was running constantly at 99%, although looking through the detail there > was only around 35% in total. It was almost all in IP input. > I put no keepalive on the fast ethernet and cpu utilisation went straight > down to 1%. > > Didn't have time to check what traffic was going on. > > Anybody have any explanation? > > Cheers, > > Gaz > > CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/65%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: > 99% > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process >12920 3767046 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Load Meter >2 423173 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 PPP auth >3 7669232 2230284 3438 0.00% 0.03% 0.02% 0 Check heaps >4 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Chunk Manager >5 821380 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Pool Manager >6 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Timers >75012 12621397 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Serial Backgroun >86831 3765897 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ALARM_TRIGGER_SC >9 356627773 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Environmental mo > 10 753315430 2 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ARP Input > 11 025 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 DDR Timers > 12 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Dialer event > 13 0 4 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Entity MIB API > 14 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 SERIAL A'detect > 15 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Critical Bkgnd > 16 135559 2095603 64 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Background > 17 8 953 8 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Logger > 18 31610 18804830 1 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0 TTY Background > 19 16334 18805051 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Per-Second Jobs > 20 4 2 2000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Hawkeye Backgrou > 213278 1354 2420 0.00% 0.12% 0.35% 0 Exec > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process > 22 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 HDV background > 23 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 VNM DSPRM MAIN > 24 042 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Input > 254407 3767048 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Compute load avg > 26 6294136314153 20035 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% 0 Per-minute Jobs > 27 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 CES Line Conditi > 29 129535685967188 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ecaimLoPri > 3013206273 2500683 5281 34.77% 33.20% 32.77% 0 IP Input > 31 6215447 2353531 2640 0.08% 0.03% 0.00% 0 CDP Protocol Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32603&t=32599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 99% CPU Utilisation with ethernet disconnected [7:32599]
>From memory, its a 3DES 12.1.5 T8 at the moment. I've not got access from home. I'll set it up when I get chance to get back in the lab and see whether IOS upgrade does the trick. Gaz ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Which version of IOS are you using? You might want to try a different > version of IOS. > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ""Gaz"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi all, > > > > This is not really a problem, just curious and not been able to find a > > reason for it. > > > > I went to a site yesterday which ran 3DES on a 2650 with VPN module with > > just serial and fast ethernet. The firewall connected to the fast ethernet > > had been disconnected ready for me to move the router. I noticed that it > > took a while to accept the password, and around a minute for write mem, so > I > > did a sho proc cpu. > > CPU was running constantly at 99%, although looking through the detail > there > > was only around 35% in total. It was almost all in IP input. > > I put no keepalive on the fast ethernet and cpu utilisation went straight > > down to 1%. > > > > Didn't have time to check what traffic was going on. > > > > Anybody have any explanation? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Gaz > > > > CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/65%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: > > 99% > > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process > >12920 3767046 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Load Meter > >2 423173 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 PPP auth > >3 7669232 2230284 3438 0.00% 0.03% 0.02% 0 Check heaps > >4 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Chunk Manager > >5 821380 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Pool Manager > >6 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Timers > >75012 12621397 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Serial > Backgroun > >86831 3765897 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 > ALARM_TRIGGER_SC > >9 356627773 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Environmental > mo > > 10 753315430 2 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ARP Input > > 11 025 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 DDR Timers > > 12 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Dialer event > > 13 0 4 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Entity MIB API > > 14 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 SERIAL > A'detect > > 15 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Critical Bkgnd > > 16 135559 2095603 64 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Background > > 17 8 953 8 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Logger > > 18 31610 18804830 1 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0 TTY Background > > 19 16334 18805051 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Per-Second > Jobs > > 20 4 2 2000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Hawkeye > Backgrou > > 213278 1354 2420 0.00% 0.12% 0.35% 0 Exec > > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process > > 22 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 HDV background > > 23 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 VNM DSPRM MAIN > > 24 042 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Input > > 254407 3767048 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Compute load > avg > > 26 6294136314153 20035 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% 0 Per-minute > Jobs > > 27 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 CES Line > Conditi > > 29 129535685967188 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ecaimLoPri > > 3013206273 2500683 5281 34.77% 33.20% 32.77% 0 IP Input > > 31 6215447 2353531 2640 0.08% 0.03% 0.00% 0 CDP Protocol Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32602&t=32599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 99% CPU Utilisation with ethernet disconnected [7:32599]
Which version of IOS are you using? You might want to try a different version of IOS. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] ""Gaz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > This is not really a problem, just curious and not been able to find a > reason for it. > > I went to a site yesterday which ran 3DES on a 2650 with VPN module with > just serial and fast ethernet. The firewall connected to the fast ethernet > had been disconnected ready for me to move the router. I noticed that it > took a while to accept the password, and around a minute for write mem, so I > did a sho proc cpu. > CPU was running constantly at 99%, although looking through the detail there > was only around 35% in total. It was almost all in IP input. > I put no keepalive on the fast ethernet and cpu utilisation went straight > down to 1%. > > Didn't have time to check what traffic was going on. > > Anybody have any explanation? > > Cheers, > > Gaz > > CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/65%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: > 99% > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process >12920 3767046 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Load Meter >2 423173 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 PPP auth >3 7669232 2230284 3438 0.00% 0.03% 0.02% 0 Check heaps >4 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Chunk Manager >5 821380 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Pool Manager >6 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Timers >75012 12621397 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Serial Backgroun >86831 3765897 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ALARM_TRIGGER_SC >9 356627773 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Environmental mo > 10 753315430 2 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ARP Input > 11 025 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 DDR Timers > 12 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Dialer event > 13 0 4 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Entity MIB API > 14 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 SERIAL A'detect > 15 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Critical Bkgnd > 16 135559 2095603 64 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Background > 17 8 953 8 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Logger > 18 31610 18804830 1 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0 TTY Background > 19 16334 18805051 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Per-Second Jobs > 20 4 2 2000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Hawkeye Backgrou > 213278 1354 2420 0.00% 0.12% 0.35% 0 Exec > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process > 22 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 HDV background > 23 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 VNM DSPRM MAIN > 24 042 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Input > 254407 3767048 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Compute load avg > 26 6294136314153 20035 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% 0 Per-minute Jobs > 27 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 CES Line Conditi > 29 129535685967188 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ecaimLoPri > 3013206273 2500683 5281 34.77% 33.20% 32.77% 0 IP Input > 31 6215447 2353531 2640 0.08% 0.03% 0.00% 0 CDP Protocol Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32601&t=32599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: 99% CPU Utilisation with ethernet disconnected [7:32599]
Hi all, This is not really a problem, just curious and not been able to find a reason for it. I went to a site yesterday which ran 3DES on a 2650 with VPN module with just serial and fast ethernet. The firewall connected to the fast ethernet had been disconnected ready for me to move the router. I noticed that it took a while to accept the password, and around a minute for write mem, so I did a sho proc cpu. CPU was running constantly at 99%, although looking through the detail there was only around 35% in total. It was almost all in IP input. I put no keepalive on the fast ethernet and cpu utilisation went straight down to 1%. Didn't have time to check what traffic was going on. Anybody have any explanation? Cheers, Gaz CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/65%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: 99% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 12920 3767046 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Load Meter 2 423173 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 PPP auth 3 7669232 2230284 3438 0.00% 0.03% 0.02% 0 Check heaps 4 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Chunk Manager 5 821380 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Pool Manager 6 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Timers 75012 12621397 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Serial Backgroun 86831 3765897 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ALARM_TRIGGER_SC 9 356627773 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Environmental mo 10 753315430 2 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ARP Input 11 025 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 DDR Timers 12 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Dialer event 13 0 4 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Entity MIB API 14 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 SERIAL A'detect 15 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Critical Bkgnd 16 135559 2095603 64 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Background 17 8 953 8 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Logger 18 31610 18804830 1 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0 TTY Background 19 16334 18805051 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Per-Second Jobs 20 4 2 2000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Hawkeye Backgrou 213278 1354 2420 0.00% 0.12% 0.35% 0 Exec PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 22 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 HDV background 23 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 VNM DSPRM MAIN 24 042 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Input 254407 3767048 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Compute load avg 26 6294136314153 20035 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% 0 Per-minute Jobs 27 0 1 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 CES Line Conditi 29 129535685967188 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ecaimLoPri 3013206273 2500683 5281 34.77% 33.20% 32.77% 0 IP Input 31 6215447 2353531 2640 0.08% 0.03% 0.00% 0 CDP Protocol Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32599&t=32599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Equipment for home lab? [7:32573]
Thanks Brad. What about prices? Would be interested in purchasing something like what you described. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32598&t=32573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX and PPTP [7:32593]
GREAT/ Thanks it worked. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32597&t=32593 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX and PPTP [7:32593]
OK...I tried allowing GRE (47) thru. However the remote workstation still shows an "established" connection (via netstat -n on the workstation), but adding 47 as a conduit permit in the PIX did not fix the problem... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32596&t=32593 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX and PPTP [7:32593]
conduit permit gre host 1.1.1.1 any replace 1.1.1.1 with your outside IP of your VPN server -Original Message- From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 4:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX and PPTP [7:32593] We are using a PIX 520, running PIX Version 4.4(8). I have opened tcp/udp port 1723 for our outside office members to connect to our W2K VPN Server. I can get the intial connect (shown in the "SH CONN" command), but it never finsihes the final "handshake". Any problems with this verison of the PIX IOS not allowing PP2P connection thru? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32595&t=32593 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX and PPTP [7:32593]
Man am I having trouble finding time to keep up with the postings. You need to permit GRE through as well. PPTP consists of a tcp control session and a GRE data channel. This way loss on the underlying transport directly affects the data path rather than having the messy tcp over tcp interactions when the network is pretty lossy or an LFN. Darrell Chris Headings wrote: > > We are using a PIX 520, running PIX Version 4.4(8). I have opened tcp/udp > port 1723 for our outside office members to connect to our W2K VPN Server. > I can get the intial connect (shown in the "SH CONN" command), but it never > finsihes the final "handshake". > > Any problems with this verison of the PIX IOS not allowing PP2P connection > thru? > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32594&t=32593 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Home-use PABX [7:32584]
James- I'm not sure about Nortel, Lucent, or any of the other manufacturers, but I know you can pick up a 3COM NBX off of ebay for 1/3 the price of it brand new. They are usually posted with different variable line cards, so you can read the descriptions and get a little education from there as to what you may want. Keep in mind that E1/T1 still applies to Europe as opposed to North America, so you would have to make sure that your Multi-Flex trunk card on your 26xx/36xx/AS5x00 router can support that type of trunk connection directly to the P(A)BX. Also, keep in mind that you may just have scenarios where you used E&M lines, so getting the appropriate router equipment for that will serve just as well as if you were trialing the Analogue FXS/FXO line options. The thing to keep in mind is there are several combinations as to how you want to "soup-bowl". One thing to note about the 3Com NBX- it's web-administered, as compared to some of the other P(A)BXs that are administered via one of the "admin" version telephones, or via terminal service connection with a bunch of cryptic commands. While the web gui would be a crutch initially, it'll sure help learn the XYZs a whole lot faster... of which the XYZs are going to be fairly the same across most P(A)BX vendors... just like configuring routers for different vendors- TCP/IP is still the same no matter how you slice it. That's my .25 for the month. It's all mere opinion, of which is always open to modification based on new information :) HTHs! Mark Odette II -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Home-use PABX [7:32584] I have a home lab just now consisting of a number of routers for data. I would like to get more in to the voice side of networking and wonder where best to start. My thoughts are to buy a small second hand PABX with E1 and ISDN PRI lines but I'm really not sure if that's how a PBX would be provisioned. I guess that older PBXs would have analogue lines which would not connect to my routers as I want them to, though some analogue mixed with the above digital would be OK. Of course, cost would be a major factor but I haven't as yet seen anything for sale that looked like a digital telephone switch. So, that's the problem. As a starter for ten I would be grateful if someone could point me in the right direction. Thanks. - James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32589&t=32584 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX and PPTP [7:32593]
We are using a PIX 520, running PIX Version 4.4(8). I have opened tcp/udp port 1723 for our outside office members to connect to our W2K VPN Server. I can get the intial connect (shown in the "SH CONN" command), but it never finsihes the final "handshake". Any problems with this verison of the PIX IOS not allowing PP2P connection thru? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32593&t=32593 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Most network devices are designed never to be shutdown. Take for instance the 2900 and 3500 series switches (either plugged and running or not). Flipping the switch is about all you've got. All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Richard Tufaro Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 2:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Stupid Question [7:32591] What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but shutdown? Just flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me. Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA Network Engineer - Anda Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32592&t=32591 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stupid Question [7:32591]
What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but shutdown? Just flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me. Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA Network Engineer - Anda Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32591&t=32591 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IOS Recommendation [7:32532]
The only way I've seen Cisco "recommend" any one version of IOS/CatOS over another is 1) for customers with an open P1 case (that has been open for quite a while, escalated to the Nth degree, etc.) where moving to a different version of code would resolve particular known issues that they are facing; or 2) paying for an NSA agreement (big $$ over and above SmartNet). I've also gotten several recommendations from 1st level TAC to upgrade to the "latest and greatest" but I usually ignore these suggestions. My current client calls this process "finding the 'least offensive' version of code." Doing a "bug scrub" can be quite labor-intensive and unfortunately as Joe-Customer, I'm not able to see all of the open bugs - some are "Cisco-internal." I only found that out when I had an open TAC case and the engineer referenced a bug that I couldn't pull up in the bug navigator. Fortunately, my current client runs the "network that Noah built" - i.e. two of everything; as such I'm usually able to upgrade one of the devices and wait some period of time to see of anything goes wrong before upgrading the other. Obviously not a foolproof method...but, what can you do. I also refrain from using code that hasn't been given time to "age" several weeks (at a minimum); I figure the chance of a bug being known is higher on code that is 6 weeks old than it is on code 6 days old. I've already identified a few bugs for Cisco, I'm more than happy to spread this experience to others who haven't had the opportunity. If anyone has better ideas I'd love to hear them. Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Tufaro Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IOS Recommendation [7:32532] Anyone know where on Cisco's site there is a place to "recommend" an image for IOS upgrade? Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA Network Engineer - Anda Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32590&t=32532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which domain registration company is the cheapest? [7:32580]
THe company should also provide DNS services and can have MX record for me Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32580&t=32580 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Equipment for home lab? [7:32573]
Byron, Here's what we sell/recommend for a typical CCIE kit: 2x 2501s 2x 2503s (for ISDN) 1x 2511 (reverse telnet AS) 3x 2513s (TR/Ether) 1x 2522 (frame-switch) ISDN Simulator (Simline2) Catalyst 5k switch 3900 TR Switch or 3920 Token Ring switch simulator misc. cables and accessories Make sure all of the 2500 series routers have 16D/16F so you can run any IOS you like on them. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html ""Byron Mobley"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > From reading this forum it seems this topic has been addressed before but I > can't find a list of what's required for a good / complete home lab for CCNP > and then CCIE. Any help, comments, suggestions would be appreciated. And > yes, like most people I'm on a budget. Thanks in andvance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32583&t=32573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE #8642 [7:32411]
Dear, If you are interested to work in United Arab Emirates (UAE), Please let me know and send me your resume. FayyazEngelhard M. Labiro wrote: > > Hi William, > > Congratulations! Passed at first time, that is impressive. > Any secrets ? > How long did you prepare for the lab after you got the written? > Any lab`s materials can you recommend other than > what we already knew ? > > Regards, > > > First I would like to thank everyone here who has answered my > questions, > and > > everyone who posts here. This is an invaluable source of > information. > > > > I took my lab exam on Tuesday in San Jose, it was my first > attempt and I > was > > very nervous. I didn't think that I did well enough to pass > and had a > very > > bad plane flight home waiting to look at the email. To my > relief I did > > better than I thought and was happy to see my number waiting > for me in my > > email. > > > > To everyone here, again I say thank you. > > > > To everyone working twoards the lab exam, your hard work will > pay off. > > > > Bill L. > > > > P.S. Anyone need a new CCIE to work for them ? :) > > If you are interested to work in UAE, please let me know. Fayyaz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32568&t=32411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secret 5 passwords [7:32535]
It would be much faster if you do password recovery. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/index.shtml dave >From: "Patrick Bass" >Reply-To: "Patrick Bass" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Secret 5 passwords [7:32535] >Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 12:57:00 -0500 > >look for a perl script called "cisco audit tool" that can help you automate >a dictionary attack...this is probably your only hope of "cracking" a >secret >5 password. if you have physical access to the device, it takes about 5 >minutes to complete a password recovery. > > >""Bolton, Travis"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Team, > > > > Does anybody have a way to crack these secret 5 passwords? I'm trying >to > > break into one of my switches since the password has been lost due to >our > > merger with this past company. Thanks. > > > > Travis Bolton > > CCNP CCDA _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32588&t=32535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE #8642 [7:32411]
Hi, In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > > I have my lab on 01/04/2002. > I think you missed yout lab! ..oops,the correct date is 04/19/2002 (to many beer on the latest night?) Gerd Thuemmler Berlin, Germany Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32587&t=32411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secret 5 passwords [7:32535]
look for a perl script called "cisco audit tool" that can help you automate a dictionary attack...this is probably your only hope of "cracking" a secret 5 password. if you have physical access to the device, it takes about 5 minutes to complete a password recovery. ""Bolton, Travis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Team, > > Does anybody have a way to crack these secret 5 passwords? I'm trying to > break into one of my switches since the password has been lost due to our > merger with this past company. Thanks. > > Travis Bolton > CCNP CCDA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32586&t=32535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Have CCNA v1. Want to move onto CCNP. [7:32569]
MrSpiffy, Good news!, the CCNA is good for 3 years instead of 2. My certificate from Cisco states valid through September 16 2003 and I passed the exam in 2000. If you were in the undertaking of CCNP and your CCNA expires then you would have to re-cert CCNA Get the CCNP and you will just need to pass the re-cert exam on that from here on out.. MrSpiffy wrote: >Hi, I have CCNA v1.0 (I've have had it for around 1.5 yrs). I was wanting to >move onto CCNP. I've been on the cisco site and it mentions the fact that I >require a current valid CCNA to move onto the CCNP track. I have a few >questions: > >1. When will my CCNA expire? Im guessing in 6 months time as I once heard >that CCNA is valid for 2 yrs. > >2. If my CCNA expires in 6 months does this mean I have to complete any one >of the CCNP modules within the next 6 months for me to still be allowed to >go for CCNP without having to do CCNA v2? Or does it mean i have to complete >all 4 CCNP exams within the next 6 months prior to my CCNA expiring? i.e. >just wondering what happens if my CCNA expires whilst im undertaking CCNP. > >Thanks for your help! >Cheers, >MrSpiffy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32585&t=32569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home-use PABX [7:32584]
I have a home lab just now consisting of a number of routers for data. I would like to get more in to the voice side of networking and wonder where best to start. My thoughts are to buy a small second hand PABX with E1 and ISDN PRI lines but I'm really not sure if that's how a PBX would be provisioned. I guess that older PBXs would have analogue lines which would not connect to my routers as I want them to, though some analogue mixed with the above digital would be OK. Of course, cost would be a major factor but I haven't as yet seen anything for sale that looked like a digital telephone switch. So, that's the problem. As a starter for ten I would be grateful if someone could point me in the right direction. Thanks. - James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32584&t=32584 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emergency: Any body has the Course Material of Cisco SS7 [7:32582]
Hi, everybody, Any body has the Course Material of Cisco SS7 Interconnect for Access server ? Cause I need to implement this system soon, if you have please Email to me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32582&t=32582 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Equipment for home lab? [7:32573]
Thanks a lot! Some very good advice. If you don't mind me asking where are you located? Noticed the bellsouth.net address.Stefan Dozier wrote: > > Bryon, check out this recent message posted by Dennis Laganiere. > > Here's the link in the archives > > http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31324&t=31305 > > HTH > > Stefan > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of > Byron Mobley > Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 8:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Equipment for home lab? [7:32573] > > > From reading this forum it seems this topic has been addressed > before but I > can't find a list of what's required for a good / complete home > lab for CCNP > and then CCIE. Any help, comments, suggestions would be > appreciated. And > yes, like most people I'm on a budget. Thanks in andvance. > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32581&t=32573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade Problem IOS to c2600-jk8o3s-mz.122-6a.bin [7:32577]
Did you test that the flash upgrade was successful before trying to upgrade to the new IOS? Try booting to rommon, erasing the flash, and loading the known good image. Craig At 09:30 AM 1/19/2002 -0500, you wrote: >My bootstrap is 11.3(2)XA4 of 2612 cisco router. After I remove 8M flash to >16M flash and upgrade to 12.2-6 IOS, >boot process cannot recogonize flash program occur. > >What is the problem! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32579&t=32577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE R/S Written Exam [7:32546]
A quick search of www.cisco.com will answer all you questions. ""Ed Chuchaisri"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Guys, > What are some of the topics covered in the R/S written? It covers materials > for Routing 2.0 and Switching 2.0 right? What about Remote Access and > Troubleshooting? Is it necessary to complete Routing TCP/IP I and II back > to back for the written exam? Any other recommended books? > > Thanks, > > Ed > www.router4u.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32578&t=32546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrade Problem IOS to c2600-jk8o3s-mz.122-6a.bin [7:32577]
My bootstrap is 11.3(2)XA4 of 2612 cisco router. After I remove 8M flash to 16M flash and upgrade to 12.2-6 IOS, boot process cannot recogonize flash program occur. What is the problem! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32577&t=32577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Equipment for home lab? [7:32573]
Bryon, check out this recent message posted by Dennis Laganiere. Here's the link in the archives http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31324&t=31305 HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Byron Mobley Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 8:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Equipment for home lab? [7:32573] >From reading this forum it seems this topic has been addressed before but I can't find a list of what's required for a good / complete home lab for CCNP and then CCIE. Any help, comments, suggestions would be appreciated. And yes, like most people I'm on a budget. Thanks in andvance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32576&t=32573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written [7:32575]
A good day for me on Thursday: I passed the CIT, the last exam for my CCNP in the morning and passed the CCIE written exam in the afternoon. Thanks to groupstudy and contributors for all help. As recommended by others I used the Boson exams to let me know what I wasn't ready for and also a good book by Michael Satterlee, All In One Cisco CCIE Practice Exam and Review 350-001. This book is possibly the best value starting point for anyone considering the exam. I think the Boson test was harder than the actual exam. I would say that the CIT exam was slightly harder than the CCIE written, although 350-001 did cover a lot of ground. You should know principals of areas such as Token Ring RIFs and bridging, DLSW+ appeared, ISDN, some BGP and OSPF, RIP2 etc, a tiny bit of IS-IS and NLSP. Above all, read the questions carefully. Many answers can be eliminated which in many cases left me to choose between two that /could/ be right. For those who like to know my CIT score was 816 and CCIE written score was 90% so I must have guessed correctly a few times! Sometimes even the Cisco question writers must want some light relief. To paraphrase one of the questions, it asked what device would be used for testing a cable for a certain fault. I don't think I'm giving too much away to say that the answer that called it a Cable Defectometer was not the one I went for. Best wishes to any others planning to take the exams. - James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32575&t=32575 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multilink interface vs virtual-template [7:32479]
Well, both the virtual-template method and the interface multilink method use MPPP (RFC 1990). The only difference is in what commands you type. The interface multilink method is a bit more intuitive. In my experience, using the interface multilink method on lower-end routers (e.g. less than 7200/7500's), is sometimes flaky, and changing the config to virtual templates made it more stable. That might be fixed in newer code. I don't know because we changed everything to per-packet load-balancing CEF, which accomplished the same load-balancing as the MPPP with fewer bugs. ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I had this same question a couple of months ago. Check the archives for > responses to my post. But the only real thing I remember was that using a > virtual-template avoids some problems that using Multilink PPP has. Can't > say 100% if that's true. I know where I work, we use virtual-templates > almost exclusively. > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32574&t=32479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Equipment for home lab? [7:32573]
>From reading this forum it seems this topic has been addressed before but I can't find a list of what's required for a good / complete home lab for CCNP and then CCIE. Any help, comments, suggestions would be appreciated. And yes, like most people I'm on a budget. Thanks in andvance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32573&t=32573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call manger Installation on a non approved box [7:32572]
Hi All, I am trying to install CM on a non approved box. I have heard that this can be done by tweaking the registry on a W2K box. Does any one know which registry key needs to be changed ? Or any other solution would also be deeply appreciated. Thanks for any input in this matter. Zahid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32572&t=32572 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about Policy routing [7:32560]
Recall that unlike access lists, if no match is found in a route map, the packet is forwarded through the normal routing process. If you look at the routing table, is the next hop for the destination 10.1.1.2? ""Dovelet"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I have a question about policy route and I hope someone can help me. The > Cisco router's config is as follow: > > : > : > interface ethernet0 > ip policy route-map route1 > ! > route-map route1 10 > match ip address 11 > match ip next-hop 12 > set ip next-hop 10.1.1.2 > ! > access-list 11 permit ip 10.2.2.1 > access-list 12 permit ip 10.1.1.1 > : > : > > In the configuration, I suppose if the packet goes into ethernet 0 with > source ip address "10.2.2.1" AND the next-hop "10.1.1.1" will match the > route-map and change its next-hop to "10.1.1.2". However, I found that the > route-map does not check the second MATCH statement (i.e. match ip next-hop > 12). I found that if the packet's source ip is "10.2.2.1" and no matter what > the next-hop ip address is, the route-map will change its next-hop to > "10.1.1.2". In the menu, it state that every MATCH statements must be > matched for the set statement to be executed. Can anyone help me? > > The router is Cisco 7200 and the IOS version is 12.0 > > Regards, > Dovelet Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32571&t=32560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ipexpert lab 4 question. [7:32555]
Rajesh, > I was going thru the Lab 4 of IPEXPERT notes - IGRP/EIGRP. > > I couldn't follow the reason why on Router 4's serial interface "ip > split-horizon" is given. This is to prevent R4`s IGRP to not re-inject the routes its learned from R2. Remember that R2 and R4 are in the same IGRP routing domain, which IGRP is a distance vector protocol, that is objected to split-horizon`s rule. > I understand that on FR cloud "split-horizon" is disabled by default on > FR physical interfaces and enabled on FR sub interfaces. If thats the > case, why shouldn't we enable it on Routers R5 and R6 which are also on > FR cloud and also having physical interfaces. I think you missed the scenario ! R2, R5, R6 are on EIGRP routing domain, while R2 and R4 are on IGRP. > One thing for sure, is if I remove this "ip split-horizon" config from > R4, I see the network 150.50.24.0 flapping - The output of "sh ip route" > in R2 and R4 says connected/derived from IGRP and after a while it says > "possibly down" network. So much so, if you configure ip split-horizon > back in R4 - these messages go back. You need to enter "ip split-horizon" on R4`s serial interface because R4`s IGRP will re-advertise routes its learned from R2. HTH Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32570&t=32555 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have CCNA v1. Want to move onto CCNP. [7:32569]
Hi, I have CCNA v1.0 (I've have had it for around 1.5 yrs). I was wanting to move onto CCNP. I've been on the cisco site and it mentions the fact that I require a current valid CCNA to move onto the CCNP track. I have a few questions: 1. When will my CCNA expire? Im guessing in 6 months time as I once heard that CCNA is valid for 2 yrs. 2. If my CCNA expires in 6 months does this mean I have to complete any one of the CCNP modules within the next 6 months for me to still be allowed to go for CCNP without having to do CCNA v2? Or does it mean i have to complete all 4 CCNP exams within the next 6 months prior to my CCNA expiring? i.e. just wondering what happens if my CCNA expires whilst im undertaking CCNP. Thanks for your help! Cheers, MrSpiffy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32569&t=32569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: some further observations - CCIE Practical Studies [7:32567]
Scott, What error are you referring too? The book is correct in regards to split horizon and frame-relay. The only 'shortcoming' I see in the frame-relay chapter is that it doesn't beat into the reader's head the ip split horizon issue with frame-relay physical interfaces ;-) Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 5G Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ""Scott"" wrote: > While what you are saying regarding split horizon is true, I agree with > Chuck in that it was a little confusing exactly what the authors were > talking about (physical or sub). Anyone studying for the lab exam should > pick that error up immediately, but for people that are just really starting > down this road it could create a big bump. > > my $0.005 > > ""Brian Dennis"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Chuck, > > I don't think that you are totally correct here. Yes, on a frame-relay > > physical interface "ip split-horizon" is disable. But on a frame-relay > > multipoint subinterface "ip split-horizon" is enabled. In both places in > > chapter 5 where I found him referring to ip split horizon, it seems that > > he's referring to it in reference to frame-relay multipoint subinterfaces. > > So if that's the case, he is correct to say it needs to be disabled. > > > > The rule with frame-relay is: > > > > Physical interface - ip split horizon is off > > Multipoint subinterface - ip split horizon is on > > Point-to-point subinterface - ip split horizon is on > > > > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 > > 5G Networks, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message > > news:... > > > I've now browsed chapters 2-5 > > > > > > Chap 2 - LAN protocols - tells you everything you were afraid to ask > about > > > the raw protocols historical tables. cable types, frame types, IEEE > > > references. Let's call this the "Priscilla" chapter ;-> > > > > > > also covers bridging and switching in good detail. I read with great > > > interest the section on token ring switching, and found it to be the > best > > > guide I have seen with regards to both the theory and the practical > > > configuration of a 3920 switch. I say this with confidence because the > > > recommendations are very close to what I developed independently, using > > > Cisco documentation and the 3920 simulator which I believe NLI is now > > > selling. Confidence because not too long ago I was someplace where > this > > > was important, and everything worked the way it was supposed to on the > > 3920, > > > at least. superior IMHO to the very good explanation found in the > Kennedy > > > Clark book. > > > > > > Chap 3 WAN HDLC - OK > > > > > > Chap 4 WAN PPP - not too bad. concentrates on ISDN / dial. The section > on > > > PPP multilink is incredibly poor, to the point of being useless. this > > > surprised me, as there is so much detail elsewhere. > > > > > > Chap 5 - frame relay. another decent chapter. contains a HUGE error. > > states > > > that frame relay split horizon is on by default, and that you have to > > > disable it manually. not true, and the source of woe to many who find > > > themselves frustrated with certain sections of various practice labs. on > a > > > frame relay interface, split horizon is DISabled by default. several > CCIEs > > > otta be ashamed of themselves for letting that one through! ;-> > > > > > > The several lab exercises at the ends of each chapter cover the > > fundamentals > > > pretty well. They are not necessarily CCIE level labs, but they are > > > certainly worth looking at. > > > > > > So far, what I would say, is that the book contains a lot of good > > reference > > > information, some good practical configuration information, and some > > decent > > > exercises for all levels. I continue to recommend this one as something > > > folks new to the field, or just starting out in the certification grid, > > plan > > > on adding to their libraries. Along with the books by Doyle and Caslow, > > this > > > is one that can serve well throughout the journey. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32567&t=32567 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
