RE: Cisco VPN Client & PIX [7:40670]
might not be the same as your problem but I had a Citrix client do the same. took 2 months to troubleshoot the damn thing. Found out is was a power thing. Good luck and good hunting... Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Client & PIX [7:40670] I am using Cisco VPN Client to connect with my Office PIX 515 firwall over IPSEC 3DES encryption. My connection is droping automatically. It is not because of idle time out or maximum time out. it happens on radomly. If some one has any information on it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40677&t=40670 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
solution for part A: Lock the box, send it to your friend. Send the key as a separate delivery. In essence there are two deliveries made. - Original Message - From: "Craig Columbus" To: Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:58 AM Subject: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553] > Part A: I heard this one where the friend also has a key that will open > his lock, but not yours. Also, the condition is that no destructive > techniques are allowed, so breaking or cutting wasn't a possible solution. > > Part B: > He never states that the rope is attached to the top of the pole, just that > it's attached to the pole. So, the answer is that the poles are somewhere > between 0 and 32 feet apart. > > Craig > > At 11:33 PM 4/5/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >I'll bite. > >a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the diamond in your box > >and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts open the box. > >b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world solutions to > > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or problems. > > > > > > As an example: > > > > > > Prep: > > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a > > > diamond. > > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box. > > > > > > Goal: > > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. However > > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How do you do > > > this? > > > > > > > > > Another example: > > > > > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, and the > > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far apart are > > > the poles? > > > > > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40678&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HSSI crossover cable [7:40679]
4/6/2002 8:15am Saturday I have two 4000 routers with HSSI cards. Is there a way to set up a crossover connection between them (no MUX) ? I realize this would be a special cable. Thanks, Richard (not a Jedi yet) // Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40679&t=40679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP question [7:40525]
I have seen it happen in lab environments. For the most part, it isn't pretty. It's the worst with OSPF as it isn't possible to get to 100k+ prefixes in ISIS (cap is 32k I believe due to LSP sizes & max fragments) In my lab, I had to reboot all my cisco devices (4700's, 7513's, 2600's & access servers) Some simply locked or rebooted themselves, others became inoperable. Further, one needs to purge the LSA's from the LSDB, otherwise, they will continue to try and flood which makes the problem hard to fix when your originating router doesn't accept commands from the cli :) At 10:50 PM 4/5/2002 -0500, MADMAN wrote: >You hit the nail on the head and this is why I think synchronization is a >legacy >default attribute. If you redistributed the Internet routing table into an >IGP I think >you would not like the results. I have not tried this, has anyone > > Dave > >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > > I'm no BGP guru, but I would have thought also that redistributing *full > > routes* (as opposed to a default) into your IGP might overload internal > > routers rather badly. The original poster referred to 2600s and 3600s > > inside the AS. > > > > JMcL > > - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 05/04/2002 09:36 am - > > > > "Lomker, Michael" > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 05/04/2002 08:38 am > > Please respond to "Lomker, Michael" > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cc: > > Subject:RE: BGP question [7:40525] > > > > > Why is redistribution into an IGP a big no - no? My > > > understanding is that this is what people usually do. > > > > You'd have to be careful about advertising those routes back out to BGP > > again. There was a famous case of someone bringing down the Internet by > > creating such a loop. Needless to say, their ISP shouldn't have been > > accepting advertisements for networks that the company didn't own. >-- >David Madland >CCIE# 2016 >Sr. Network Engineer >Qwest Communications Inc. >612-664-3367 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40680&t=40525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
The first one is simple if you relate it to public key sharing in network security. Place the diamond in the box. Secure the box with your lock. Send it to your friend. So far, it's safe from the courier. When your friend receives the box, she secures the box with her lock and sends it back to you. Still safe. You remove your lock and send it back to her. Still safe. She removes her lock and retrieves the diamond. All of this is done without the use of relatively prime numbers. ;o) The second puzzle has already been answered using the details given --- 0'-32' > > -Original Message- > > From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world solutions to > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or problems. > > > > As an example: > > > > Prep: > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a > > diamond. > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box. > > > > Goal: > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. However > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How do you do > > this? > > > > > > Another example: > > > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, and the > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far apart are > > the poles? > > > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40681&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to keep BGP's session open indefinitly with no [7:40682]
router bgp 100 bgp log-neighbor-changes timers bgp 0 0 ""Anthony Pace"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > CCO say's if the holdtime is "0" then the sessions are assumed up and do not > exchange keepalives, but on the command line "timers" does not permit 0 for > the hello or hlodrime interval. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40682&t=40682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Supervisor III [7:40659]
6.3(3) requires 8 Megs FLASH and 64 Megs RAM and to be honest- I have never attempted to Xmodem or Kermit and image without some sort of network blade. Here's the output from my lab switch: cat55k Sho Version WS-C5505 Software, Version McpSW: 6.2(1a) NmpSW: 6.2(1a) Copyright (c) 1995-2002 by Cisco Systems NMP S/W compiled on Feb 10 2002, 19:54:09 MCP S/W compiled on Feb 10 2002, 19:49:14 System Bootstrap Version: 3.1.2 Hardware Version: 1.0 Model: WS-C5505 Serial #: 066552032 Mod Port Model Serial # Versions --- -- - 1 2WS-X5530 007586158 Hw : 1.5 Fw : 3.1.2 Fw1: 3.1(2) Sw : 6.2(1a) WS-F5520 007602065 Hw : 1.0 WS-U5531 007440134 Hw : 1.1 2 24 WS-X5224 008727049 Hw : 1.4 Fw : 3.1(1) Sw : 6.2(1a) 5 12 WS-X5213A 006815004 Hw : 2.0 Fw : 1.4 Sw : 6.2(1a) DRAMFLASH NVRAM Module Total UsedFreeTotal UsedFreeTotal Used Free -- --- --- --- --- --- --- - - - 1 65536K 20805K 44731K 8192K 5916K 2276K 512K 177K 335K Uptime is 0 day, 2 hours, 56 minutes The uplink module is the WS-U5531 and this is the RJ45 version. All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of The Edward Groove Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Supervisor III [7:40659] Hello, I need some help in answering a few questions. If i have a supervisor III (WS-X5530-E1) with no uplink modules on a Cat 5500, and need to know the minimum requirements to be able to load a newer IOS. First of all, do I need at least one switching module installed, or is there another way to upload the IOS? The memory on the Sup III is 32DRAM/4Flash. Is this configuration compatible with version 6.3(3a)? I can't seem to find any documentation on Cisco's site regarding this. Thanks in advance! Eddie [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Notebook.jpg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40684&t=40659 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Client & PIX [7:40670]
I have had this happen connecting to a concentrator. My issue was do to a misbehaving DHCP client/server. When I would connect the to the concentrator, My Linky FW would re-issue me a different IP address. It would do this several times and then stop. I know of several teammates that have the exact same home setup and they have no problems, so go Figure what is unique about mine. If you using DHCP, check to see if you getting a new DHCP address. I would also recommend using the VPN Client Loggin And turning the debug up to high on all the settings. It will create a big file, but the end of it is where Your disconnect will be. That is how I found the DHCP issue. Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 1:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Client & PIX [7:40670] I encountered the same thing with a customer recently. I've got a case logged with TAC, but haven't yet received a decent answer. I don't know if we're seeing the same thing or if you're seeing something different, but a couple of questions can quickly determine: 1) Is your client behind a firewall of any type, including personal desktop firewall software? 2) If your client is behind a firewall, are any other machines also behind the firewall? 3) Is the connection over the Internet? If so, how does each side connect to the Internet? Leased line, cable, DSL? Thanks, Craig At 11:59 PM 4/5/2002 -0500, you wrote: >I am using Cisco VPN Client to connect with my Office PIX 515 firwall >over IPSEC 3DES encryption. My connection is droping automatically. It >is not because of idle time out or maximum time out. it happens on >radomly. If some one has any information on it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40685&t=40670 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN SPIDS HELP :URGENT [7:40673]
Your telco will tell you whether you need spids or not. And you are right, only certain type of ISDN switches require them and generally you wont see them in Asia Pac or Eufope, at least I have not see a requirement by the local telco. As far as exams and simulators or remote labs, they will tell you whether a spid is needed or not and give you the spid numbers to configure on the CPE. - Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40686&t=40673 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configure transparent bridging on Cisco router problem [7:40687]
I put two FA interfaces into same bridge group, and enable bridge protocol ieee. There is not IP address configured on the bridge port. But it will not bridge any IP traffic unless I disable IP routing on the router or use bridge irb. I was expecting the bridged ports will bridge IP, because there is no IP configured on these two interface. Can somebody explain why? Thanks Ruihai Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40687&t=40687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need Clarification about Halabis BGP comment [7:40690]
"IP connectivity has to be achieved via a protocol different from BGP; otherwise, the session will be in a race condition. An example of a race condition follows: neighbors can reach one another via some IGP, the BGP session gets established, and the BGP updates get exchanged. The IGP connection goes away for some reason, but still the BGP TCP session is up because neighbors can still reach each other via BGP. Eventually the session will go down because the BGP session cannot depend on BGP itself for neighbor reachability" Wouldn't the same condition occur if reachability is acheived via a different protocol. If the route becomes unreachable then BGP conectivity will still be lost.What's the advantage of making sure that "race condition" is avoided. Thanks. JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40690&t=40690 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back to back AUX port for DDR? [7:40689]
Hi, Does anyone know if its possible to configure 2 aux ports on 2 diffrent routers, connect them back to back for DDR routing? I have seen some configuration for this, but I suspect that you need 2 modems and 2 phone lines, can someone throw some light on this subject? Any responses much appreciated, TIA _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40689&t=40689 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Back to back AUX port for DDR? [7:40689]
4/6/2002 12:34pm Saturday If you do not have two telephone lines a dial tone simulator is a wonderful thing. It has helped me a lot in my CCIE lab prep. Richard // ""Nomadic Ping"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > Does anyone know if its possible to configure 2 aux ports on 2 diffrent > routers, connect them back to back for DDR routing? I have seen some > configuration for this, but I suspect that you need 2 modems and 2 phone > lines, can someone throw some light on this subject? > > Any responses much appreciated, TIA > > > > > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40691&t=40689 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for Cisco components (Routers) - CCIE Lab [7:40567]
Siva, please contact me, I live in Sydney and will be preparing for CCIE very soon. I have 60% of my home lab at the moment Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40692&t=40567 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for Cisco components (Routers) - CCIE [7:40567]
Sorry, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40693&t=40567 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco VPN Client & PIX [7:40670]
Clients are behind Linksys Cable/DSL router and in the office we have PIX 515. PIX assigns IP address from Local IP address Pool. ""Curious"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am using Cisco VPN Client to connect with my Office PIX 515 firwall over > IPSEC 3DES encryption. My connection is droping automatically. It is not > because of idle time out or maximum time out. it happens on radomly. If some > one has any information on it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40688&t=40670 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
But the courier will steal anything that isn't locked up, including a key! I believe the solution is as follows: Your friend sends you his box, unlocked, by courier. You place your key inside his box, lock it, and send it back. You then place the diamond into your box, lock it, and send it over. He can unlock your box because he has your key. John On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Kent Yu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Daniel, > > I think the first answer could be just lock the stone in the box, give > the > box and your key to the courier. > > Kent > > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'll bite. > > a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the diamond in your > box > > and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts open the box. > > b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world solutions > to > > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or problems. > > > > > > As an example: > > > > > > Prep: > > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a > > > diamond. > > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box. > > > > > > Goal: > > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. However > > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How do you do > > > this? > > > > > > > > > Another example: > > > > > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, and the > > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far apart are > > > the poles? > > > > > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40694&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
John, I did not think of the key, but the couier could steal the unlocked box, right? I think John Allhiser got it right. I guess I need spend more time on security. Kent ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > But the courier will steal anything that isn't locked up, > including a key! I believe the solution is as follows: > > Your friend sends you his box, unlocked, by courier. You place > your key inside his box, lock it, and send it back. You then > place the diamond into your box, lock it, and send it over. He > can unlock your box because he has your key. > > John > > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Kent Yu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Daniel, > > > > I think the first answer could be just lock the stone in the > box, give > > the > > box and your key to the courier. > > > > Kent > > > > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I'll bite. > > > a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the > diamond in your > > box > > > and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts open > the box. > > > b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > > > > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world > solutions > > to > > > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or > problems. > > > > > > > > As an example: > > > > > > > > Prep: > > > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a > > > > diamond. > > > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box. > > > > > > > > Goal: > > > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. > However > > > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How > do you do > > > > this? > > > > > > > > > > > > Another example: > > > > > > > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, > and the > > > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far > apart are > > > > the poles? > > > > > > > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40695&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
how about lock his box inside your box, let him keep his key and send the
key with your box with the courier.
-Patrick
>>> "Joe Morabito" 04/06/02 09:04AM >>>
solution for part A:
Lock the box, send it to your friend. Send the key as a separate delivery.
In essence there are two deliveries made.
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Columbus"
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
> Part A: I heard this one where the friend also has a key that will open
> his lock, but not yours. Also, the condition is that no destructive
> techniques are allowed, so breaking or cutting wasn't a possible solution.
>
> Part B:
> He never states that the rope is attached to the top of the pole, just
that
> it's attached to the pole. So, the answer is that the poles are somewhere
> between 0 and 32 feet apart.
>
> Craig
>
> At 11:33 PM 4/5/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >I'll bite.
> >a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the diamond in your
box
> >and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts open the box.
> >b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553]
> >
> > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world solutions to
> > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or problems.
> > >
> > > As an example:
> > >
> > > Prep:
> > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a
> > > diamond.
> > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box.
> > >
> > > Goal:
> > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. However
> > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How do you do
> > > this?
> > >
> > >
> > > Another example:
> > >
> > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, and the
> > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far apart are
> > > the poles?
> > >
> > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations.
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40696&t=40553
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Back to back AUX port for DDR? [7:40689]
Whats a dial tone simulator and where can you get one, also can i take it that you cant use a back to back cable on the AUX ports? - Original Message - From: "nettable_walker" To: Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 7:30 PM Subject: Re: Back to back AUX port for DDR? [7:40689] > 4/6/2002 12:34pm Saturday > > If you do not have two telephone lines a dial tone simulator is a wonderful > thing. > It has helped me a lot in my CCIE lab prep. > > Richard > > // > > ""Nomadic Ping"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, > > > > Does anyone know if its possible to configure 2 aux ports on 2 diffrent > > routers, connect them back to back for DDR routing? I have seen some > > configuration for this, but I suspect that you need 2 modems and 2 phone > > lines, can someone throw some light on this subject? > > > > Any responses much appreciated, TIA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40697&t=40689 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configure transparent bridging on Cisco router problem [7:40699]
Cisco default bridging can only bridge or route a protocol globally. So if you have ip routing enabled, it cannot be bridged. 'bridge crb' lets you bridge or route a protocol per bridge group, and 'bridge irb' lets you bridge and route a protocol bridge group using BVIs. Andrew Cook ""nntp.groupstudy.com"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I put two FA interfaces into same bridge group, and enable bridge protocol > ieee. There is not IP address configured on the bridge port. But it will > not > bridge any IP traffic unless I disable IP routing on the router or use bridge > irb. I was expecting the bridged ports will bridge IP, because there is no > IP configured on these two interface. Can somebody explain why? > > Thanks > > Ruihai Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40699&t=40699 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back AUX port for DDR? [7:40689]
You certainly can use a rollover cable between aux ports. But as far as DDR goes, you're kinda missing the dial part aren't you? Nomadic Ping wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone know if its possible to configure 2 aux ports on 2 > diffrent > routers, connect them back to back for DDR routing? I have seen > some > configuration for this, but I suspect that you need 2 modems > and 2 phone > lines, can someone throw some light on this subject? > > Any responses much appreciated, TIA > > > > > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40700&t=40689 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSSI crossover cable [7:40679]
Richard, Yes you can. Check out the null modem pinout in this document: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis4000/4000cn/4260hcab.htm Scott Mr. Richard L. Pickard wrote: > > 4/6/2002 8:15am Saturday > > I have two 4000 routers with HSSI cards. Is there a way to set > up a > crossover connection between them (no MUX) ? > I realize this would be a special cable. > > Thanks, > > Richard (not a Jedi yet) > > // > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40701&t=40679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
Might I ask how your going to lock his box ? The courier would steal it if he gets his hands on it the dang courier. Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553] But the courier will steal anything that isn't locked up, including a key! I believe the solution is as follows: Your friend sends you his box, unlocked, by courier. You place your key inside his box, lock it, and send it back. You then place the diamond into your box, lock it, and send it over. He can unlock your box because he has your key. John On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Kent Yu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Daniel, > > I think the first answer could be just lock the stone in the box, give > the > box and your key to the courier. > > Kent > > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'll bite. > > a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the diamond in your > box > > and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts open the box. > > b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world solutions > to > > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or problems. > > > > > > As an example: > > > > > > Prep: > > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a diamond. > > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box. > > > > > > Goal: > > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. However > > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How do you do > > > this? > > > > > > > > > Another example: > > > > > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, and the > > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far apart are > > > the poles? > > > > > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40702&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
I don't see why your friend can't send you his lock (without the key), allowing you put diamond in any your box but lock it with his lock, and send it back. I guess I don't understand what the courier is going to steal. Will he take anything, including boxes and locks, or just diamonds? On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 14:21, Kent Yu wrote: > John, > > I did not think of the key, but the couier could steal the unlocked box, > right? > I think John Allhiser got it right. I guess I need spend more time on > security. > > Kent > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > But the courier will steal anything that isn't locked up, > > including a key! I believe the solution is as follows: > > > > Your friend sends you his box, unlocked, by courier. You place > > your key inside his box, lock it, and send it back. You then > > place the diamond into your box, lock it, and send it over. He > > can unlock your box because he has your key. > > > > John > > > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Kent Yu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > Daniel, > > > > > > I think the first answer could be just lock the stone in the > > box, give > > > the > > > box and your key to the courier. > > > > > > Kent > > > > > > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > I'll bite. > > > > a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the > > diamond in your > > > box > > > > and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts open > > the box. > > > > b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > > > > > > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world > > solutions > > > to > > > > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or > > problems. > > > > > > > > > > As an example: > > > > > > > > > > Prep: > > > > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a > > > > > diamond. > > > > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box. > > > > > > > > > > Goal: > > > > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. > > However > > > > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How > > do you do > > > > > this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another example: > > > > > > > > > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, > > and the > > > > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far > > apart are > > > > > the poles? > > > > > > > > > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40703&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
I guess I was going on two assumptions: first, if the courier could steal the box itself then the rest of the puzzle is moot ; and second, that these were boxes with attached locks and you could lock them without a key. If the locks aren't attached to the box then you'd have to use one of the other solutions posted. On the second question about the poles, I found it entirely too vague. It never stated where the ropes were attached to the poles or even if the poles were aligned vertically. What if the poles were horizontal and the rope was attached to the middle? :-) John On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Roberts, Larry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Might I ask how your going to lock his box ? The courier would steal it > if > he gets his hands on it the dang courier. > > Thanks > > Larry > > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 2:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > But the courier will steal anything that isn't locked up, > including a key! I believe the solution is as follows: > > Your friend sends you his box, unlocked, by courier. You place > your key inside his box, lock it, and send it back. You then > place the diamond into your box, lock it, and send it over. He > can unlock your box because he has your key. > > John > > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Kent Yu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Daniel, > > > > I think the first answer could be just lock the stone in the > box, give > > the > > box and your key to the courier. > > > > Kent > > > > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I'll bite. > > > a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the > diamond in your > > box > > > and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts open > the box. > > > b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > > > > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world > solutions > > to > > > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or > problems. > > > > > > > > As an example: > > > > > > > > Prep: > > > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a diamond. > > > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box. > > > > > > > > Goal: > > > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. > However > > > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How > do you do > > > > this? > > > > > > > > > > > > Another example: > > > > > > > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, > and the > > > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far > apart are > > > > the poles? > > > > > > > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40704&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSSI crossover cable [7:40679]
Cisco does/did sell such a cable. CAB-HNUL= 72-0727-01 > -Original Message- > From: Mr. Richard L. Pickard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 8:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: HSSI crossover cable [7:40679] > > > 4/6/2002 8:15am Saturday > > I have two 4000 routers with HSSI cards. Is there a way to set up a > crossover connection between them (no MUX) ? > I realize this would be a special cable. > > Thanks, > > Richard (not a Jedi yet) > > // Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40705&t=40679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
Agreed. There are too many variables here. Even if the question stated that an exact answer could be derived given this information then one of two possibilities could exist: 1) The rope is 4 feet off the ground in this configuration: | | | | | | | | |---| | | 2) the Lowest point of the rope is 0' |\| | \ | | \ | | \ | |\| Perhaps these questions were formulated to compell the prospective employee to demonstrate that he/she is capable of demanding all the necessary information to complete the puzzle. This would be required of a sales engineeer, e.g.. On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 16:10, John Neiberger wrote: > > On the second question about the poles, I found it entirely too > vague. It never stated where the ropes were attached to the > poles or even if the poles were aligned vertically. What if > the poles were horizontal and the rope was attached to the > middle? :-) > > John > > On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Roberts, Larry > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Might I ask how your going to lock his box ? The courier > would steal it > > if > > he gets his hands on it the dang courier. > > > > Thanks > > > > Larry > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 2:11 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story > [7:40553] > > > > > > But the courier will steal anything that isn't locked up, > > including a key! I believe the solution is as follows: > > > > Your friend sends you his box, unlocked, by courier. You > place > > your key inside his box, lock it, and send it back. You > then > > place the diamond into your box, lock it, and send it over. > He > > can unlock your box because he has your key. > > > > John > > > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Kent Yu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > Daniel, > > > > > > I think the first answer could be just lock the stone in the > > box, give > > > the > > > box and your key to the courier. > > > > > > Kent > > > > > > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > I'll bite. > > > > a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the > > diamond in your > > > box > > > > and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts > open > > the box. > > > > b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Dusty Harper > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > > > > > > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world > > solutions > > > to > > > > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or > > problems. > > > > > > > > > > As an example: > > > > > > > > > > Prep: > > > > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and > a diamond. > > > > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box. > > > > > > > > > > Goal: > > > > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. > > However > > > > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How > > do you do > > > > > this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another example: > > > > > > > > > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, > > and the > > > > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how > far > > apart are > > > > > the poles? > > > > > > > > > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40706&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3920 [7:40707]
would anybody have one of these that they'd be willing to part with? if so, please let me know your price. thanks! eddie _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40707&t=40707 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configuring Merge ISDN Simulator/Emulator [7:40708]
Hello, I just bought a Merge isdn simulator/emulator that only comes with the PAW software without any documentations. Could someone tell me if this simulator works right out of the box or do you need to configure it (ie. spids and dn #s). I've connected two 2503 via rj-45 and was able to get active on layer 1 but can't ping the ip address on the remote end. I appreciate all your help. Thanks, LW _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40708&t=40708 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configure transparent bridging on Cisco router problem [7:40709]
At 11:50 AM 4/6/02, nntp.groupstudy.com wrote: >I put two FA interfaces into same bridge group, and enable bridge protocol >ieee. There is not IP address configured on the bridge port. But it will >not >bridge any IP traffic unless I disable IP routing on the router I think that's normal. If you want to bridge IP, you must disable IP routing because IP routing is enabled by default. See this: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fibm_c/bcfpart1/bcftb.htm#xtocid30 >or use bridge >irb. I was expecting the bridged ports will bridge IP, because there is no >IP configured on these two interface. Can somebody explain why? > >Thanks > >Ruihai Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40709&t=40709 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How do I approach the company about my CCIE [7:40261]
I think that depends on the individual company. Our company currently has 6 CCIE's. I was dissuaded from going for CCIE by my company. The reason, although they haven't stated it in so many words is that they would just about double my pay from CCNP, but I would bring them very little more income. They would prefer me to go off and do something else that they can charge for, like security. I've not heard of any companies asking for CCIE security (yet). A senior engineer with security accreditations is almost as sellable to most companies and far cheaper to feed and water. For a lot of jobs, the same is true for Routing/Switching. Every job our company sends a CCIE to that could have been a Senior Engineer, they've lost a bit off their profit margin, and in the current climate where perhaps the jobs aren't rolling in quite so fast, there are obviously greater losses having CCIE's sat around on quiet days. CCIE is still the target I believe, but not everybody needs them at the moment. In 6/12 months if things pick up they may be pushing the CCIE again. I believe that Cisco's hiccup last year is the only thing that has devalued the CCIE. As Cisco gradually recovers, so will the CCIEprobably. Gaz ""Kris Keen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Your the 1st person I've heard say the CCIE isnt worth much anymore.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40710&t=40261 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache [7:40616]
ok, if Apache is down when you run ciscowork200, then this is because ciscowork200 use the same port 80, the should do is running the apache in the port 8080 this change is in the file httpd.conf in the line port 80. When you make this change then restart the apache server, and try. Other option is runing the apache in other port 8080. Have a nice day. - Original Message - From: "yangchun" To: Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:01 AM Subject: apache [7:40616] > dear all: > when i install the ciscowork200 the apache don't start .display : > Could not start the Apache Webserver service on local computer. > Error 1053: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a > timely fashio. > thanks you very very much! > > -- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40711&t=40616 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Book on IPv6 [7:40515]
Yes, go to check the site www.ipv6.org - Original Message - From: "Hamid Ali Asgari" To: Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:29 PM Subject: Book on IPv6 [7:40515] > Hi, > > I am looking for a book on IPv6. Any suggestions? > > Thanks > > Hamid > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40712&t=40515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need Clarification about Halabis BGP comment [7:40690]
At 01:10 PM 4/6/02, JohnZ wrote: >"IP connectivity has to be achieved via a protocol different from BGP; >otherwise, the session will be in a race condition. An example of a race >condition follows: neighbors can reach one another via some IGP, the BGP >session gets established, and the BGP updates get exchanged. This must be referring to external BGP peers that are not directly connected and must rely on an IGP for connectivity? (EBGP multihop?) Normally BGP peers are on a LAN or WAN and can reach each other directly, simply with IP and TCP. I know that's not your question, but I thought it was worth mentioning that the example is kind of a weird situation. > The IGP >connection goes away for some reason, but still the BGP TCP session is up >because neighbors can still reach each other via BGP. Eventually the session >will go down because the BGP session cannot depend on BGP itself for >neighbor reachability" > >Wouldn't the same condition occur if reachability is acheived via a >different protocol. If the other protocol fails, yes. That's what he's saying. The race condition occurs when BGP must rely on BGP for connectivity. This should never happen. The routers can normally reach each other directly with TCP/IP or via an IGP. But if the BGP protocol had been written such that BGP depended on BGP, that's a race condition. It's also a race condition when the other protocol fails and BGP is once again depending on BGP. I hope that makes sense. Priscilla >If the route becomes unreachable then BGP conectivity >will still be lost.What's the advantage of making sure that "race condition" >is avoided. > > > >Thanks. > >JZ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40713&t=40690 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Back to back AUX port for DDR? [7:40689]
Check out these websites - I have not used them so I cannot tell you if they are good products. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS? http://www.linesimulators.com/telsim.shtml http://www.digitalproductsco.com/ringit.htm Thanks, Scott Chapin, CCNP On Saturday 06 April 2002 01:31 pm, you wrote: > Whats a dial tone simulator and where can you get one, also can i take it > that you cant use a back to back cable on the AUX ports? > > > - Original Message - > From: "nettable_walker" > To: > Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 7:30 PM > Subject: Re: Back to back AUX port for DDR? [7:40689] > > > 4/6/2002 12:34pm Saturday > > > > If you do not have two telephone lines a dial tone simulator is a > > wonderful > > > thing. > > It has helped me a lot in my CCIE lab prep. > > > > Richard > > > > // > > > > ""Nomadic Ping"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Does anyone know if its possible to configure 2 aux ports on 2 diffrent > > > routers, connect them back to back for DDR routing? I have seen some > > > configuration for this, but I suspect that you need 2 modems and 2 > > > phone lines, can someone throw some light on this subject? > > > > > > Any responses much appreciated, TIA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40714&t=40689 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Configuring Merge ISDN Simulator/Emulator [7:40708]
Read your manuals..I would suggest Groupstudy be your last resort after reading everything you have..no point in getting someone to explain it to you.. Could be router config, could be merge isdn config, who knows.. Read your books, then come back and ask Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40715&t=40708 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE [7:40568]
I second all the comments here, the lab by no means is something you acheive in 2months, unless as they said your a guru of everything. I don't know one person that knows everything, and I'll assume the same about you. Dont underestimate this, give yourself 6-8months hard study in a full equiped lab. Regards Kris Sydney, Australia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40716&t=40568 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
A few problems with your theory, as I see it. #1. How do you wind up with his key to begin with? #2. If the courier will steal anything, when your friend sends you his box unlocked, the courier will steal the box - and thus, you have nothing to place your diamond into. #3. Why send diamonds by courier when they look so darned good on my hand or displayed on a delicate pendant dangling from a gold necklace laying precociously around my neck? -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553] But the courier will steal anything that isn't locked up, including a key! I believe the solution is as follows: Your friend sends you his box, unlocked, by courier. You place your key inside his box, lock it, and send it back. You then place the diamond into your box, lock it, and send it over. He can unlock your box because he has your key. John On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Kent Yu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Daniel, > > I think the first answer could be just lock the stone in the box, give > the > box and your key to the courier. > > Kent > > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'll bite. > > a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the diamond in your > box > > and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts open the box. > > b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553] > > > > > The goal is to determine how you think. Most real world solutions > to > > > problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or problems. > > > > > > As an example: > > > > > > Prep: > > > You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a > > > diamond. > > > Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box. > > > > > > Goal: > > > You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier. However > > > the courier will steal anything that is not locked. How do you do > > > this? > > > > > > > > > Another example: > > > > > > If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, and the > > > lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far apart are > > > the poles? > > > > > > It gauges how one thinks and handles situations. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40717&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting OSPF Question [7:40718]
Guys, I found that that the command for Virtual Link, i.e Area X virtual-link a.b.c.d has options to change Hello and Dead interval as well. Does it means that when we change the Hello and Dead interval in AREA 0, We must have to modify these values here on virtual link command as well?? Please correct if I M Wrong. Thkx TOM _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40718&t=40718 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Puzzles -> WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
Comments inline... On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Leigh Anne Chisholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > A few problems with your theory, as I see it. > > #1. How do you wind up with his key to begin with? > > #2. If the courier will steal anything, when your friend sends you his > box > unlocked, the courier will steal the box - and thus, you have nothing to > place > your diamond into. I made two assumptions: 1. These boxes can be locked without a key and the locks are part of the box, not separate locks. 2. The courier won't steal the whole box. If he will steal the box, then I think the rest of the puzzle is moot because he'll just run away with all the boxes! :-) I won't ever need his key. He sends me just his box, unlocked, and hopefully the courier won't steal empty, unlocked boxes. I then place my key into the box and lock it, assuming the locking mechanism does not require his key. I then place the diamond into my own box and lock it. When all of this arrives on his side he'll have my box with the diamond in it and he'll have my key to open it. If either of my assumptions are wrong then a different method would be necessary. I personally liked the method someone else suggested where you lock the box up with the diamond in it, send it to the other person who then places his own lock on it (we're assuming that the locking mechanisms are separate from the boxes) and sends it back to you. You take your lock off and send it back to him. He removes his lock and now can get to the diamond in the box. > > #3. Why send diamonds by courier when they look so darned good on my > hand or > displayed on a delicate pendant dangling from a gold necklace laying > precociously around my neck? > That sounds like something my wife would say. :-) John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40719&t=40553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF DR problem [7:34379]
I don't recall the entire context of this particular discussion, but there is an error in the commentary below that I wanted to correct. >Unfortunately, the RFC only addresses virtual links as a means to repair > a partitioned backbone. It does not address providing bacbone > connectivity to a non-backbone area. Nor does the RFC discuss demand circuits, which, > of course, is a Cisco implementation. So there may very well be a > "gottcha" in there that simply isn't addressed in the "official" OSPF documentation. RFC 1753 does indeed address OSPF demand circuits. They are not a "Cisco implimentation" A virtual link is a kind of demand circuit, and is described in RFC 1753 as well. Us router jocks sometimes can forget that the folks who designed the standards put a lot of thought into the process. If something wasn't covered, or something came up subsequent to the original standard, it tends to get addressed later. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40720&t=34379 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Supervisor III [7:40659]
Eddie- I actually decoded the RAM #'s and ordered non-Cisco. I found a reseller on Ebay who treated me very well [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think I paid something like $36 for the (2) 32 Meg matched sticks. Remember to shop for the RAM by specs: 32bit, 72pin EDO SIMM, 2k, 60ns Also- for the FLASH, 8 Megs of 2500 series will do. A PCMCIA card can be installed into you Slot:0 or Slot:1, but I would venture the FLASH stick to be your cheapest option. It's all on Ebay :o) All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: The Edward Groove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 1:09 PM To: 'Circusnuts_1999' Subject: RE: Supervisor III [7:40659] thanks for your help, phil. do you have any idea how i can upgrade the memory, if my sup comes only with 4flash/32dram? have you ever done this? do you have any part numbers? eddie -Original Message- From: Circusnuts_1999 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 10:26 AM To: 'The Edward Groove'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Supervisor III [7:40659] 6.3(3) requires 8 Megs FLASH and 64 Megs RAM and to be honest- I have never attempted to Xmodem or Kermit and image without some sort of network blade. Here's the output from my lab switch: cat55k Sho Version WS-C5505 Software, Version McpSW: 6.2(1a) NmpSW: 6.2(1a) Copyright (c) 1995-2002 by Cisco Systems NMP S/W compiled on Feb 10 2002, 19:54:09 MCP S/W compiled on Feb 10 2002, 19:49:14 System Bootstrap Version: 3.1.2 Hardware Version: 1.0 Model: WS-C5505 Serial #: 066552032 Mod Port Model Serial # Versions --- -- - 1 2WS-X5530 007586158 Hw : 1.5 Fw : 3.1.2 Fw1: 3.1(2) Sw : 6.2(1a) WS-F5520 007602065 Hw : 1.0 WS-U5531 007440134 Hw : 1.1 2 24 WS-X5224 008727049 Hw : 1.4 Fw : 3.1(1) Sw : 6.2(1a) 5 12 WS-X5213A 006815004 Hw : 2.0 Fw : 1.4 Sw : 6.2(1a) DRAMFLASH NVRAM Module Total UsedFreeTotal UsedFreeTotal Used Free -- --- --- --- --- --- --- - - - 1 65536K 20805K 44731K 8192K 5916K 2276K 512K 177K 335K Uptime is 0 day, 2 hours, 56 minutes The uplink module is the WS-U5531 and this is the RJ45 version. All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of The Edward Groove Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Supervisor III [7:40659] Hello, I need some help in answering a few questions. If i have a supervisor III (WS-X5530-E1) with no uplink modules on a Cat 5500, and need to know the minimum requirements to be able to load a newer IOS. First of all, do I need at least one switching module installed, or is there another way to upload the IOS? The memory on the Sup III is 32DRAM/4Flash. Is this configuration compatible with version 6.3(3a)? I can't seem to find any documentation on Cisco's site regarding this. Thanks in advance! Eddie [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Notebook.jpg] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From: Madeline Dang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:49 PM To: Circusnuts_1999 Subject: RE: Question for seller -- Item #2011782719 Thank you for your email. I don't have these module post on the web. THese memory are hard to find, and I only have a dozen on hand incase my customer bought the wrong memory and wish to exchange. Anyway, your subtotal including shipping and handling is $36.50 These memory do carry 30 day waranty, just like all the memory on my auctions. I accept Paypal, Bidpay, Cashier Check or Money order My paypal ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For cashier check or money order, please send to: Madeline Dang 1686 W. Recreo Plaza Anaheim, CA 92802 --- Circusnuts_1999 wrote: > Sure- do I need to bid on an auction or can I > purchase this outright ??? > > Would you have a total with shipping ??? > > Thanks > Phil Lorenz > 3289 Greco Ct. > Woodbridge, VA > 22192 > > > -Original Message- > From: Madeline Dang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Question for seller -- Item #2011782719 > > THank you for your email. > > your board work on 2k refresh memory. > If you use 4k refresh memory on 2k board, then the > memory only recognize 1/2 or 1/4 of the total size > of > the memory. > > I do carry 2x32mb 2k refresh for $30 if need. > > mwdusa > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2011782719 > > > > May I get some adv
Re: ISDN SPIDS HELP :URGENT [7:40673]
It depends on the ISDN switch type. If you are using basic-net3 (like the simline2 uses), then, NO, you do not need spids. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) ""IT Guy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi GUys, > > Need your help to solve a confusion. I studied that SPIDS are required > by swithces in NA only and certain parts of europ, and by certain ISDN > switches. > > DOes it mean that for sure that WE DONOT NEED TO USE SPIDS in Asia pacific > ISDN switches to make them work and they should be able to work even without > SPIDs. > > In more deapth, Means that even we get SPIDS in Exam in Asia pacific region > anywhere, we donto need to use them..Am I right?? > > > Thanks for help. > > TOM > > > > _ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40675&t=40673 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: i am receiving spam (From GroupStudy) [7:40596]
Yeah, I got the same crap the other day as well. Bad move for whoever owns gdd.net, as they were promptly added to my kill filter and I will never receive another email from them again. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40683&t=40596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco PIX question, static, conduit, and alias [7:40722]
I am having a problem getting to the inside Mail/Web servers from the outside and I can't determine why. I'm replacing an old Cisco 7000 router with a new 7206 VXR. I'm also reconfiguring the way their PIX was setup. The servers were configured with outside addresses (the PIX had a 'nat 0 xxx.yyy.115.0' statement) which made them vulnerable. I am moving them to an inside address and building a conduit from the outside to the inside. In order to leave their old network up and running while I configured the 7206VXR. I used my PIX 506 (Ver 5.x) for configuration purposes. I had everything configured and working. Then over the Easter holiday I configured their PIX trying to use the same statements that I had in my PIX 506. This is where I ran into problems. Since they are running such an old version (Ver 4.1.4) of the IOS I could not use the same exact commands. I'm not as familiar with the PIX 4.1.4 commands and obviously have something stated incorrectly. Below I have what I believe to be the pertinent information from both the 7206 and PIX. Can someone tell me where I went wrong. The xxx.yyy represent the same 2 octets through out both configs. Any help greatly appreciated. Cisco 7206 VXR interface FastEthernet0/1 description ** Firewall Connection (inside area)** ip address xxx.yyy.115.18 255.255.255.240 secondary ip address 172.20.19.3 255.255.255.0 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.yyy.253.129!(points to the ISP) ip route xxx.yyy.115.0 255.255.255.0 xxx.yyy.115.17 !(points to the PIX) Cisco PIX 4.1.4 (this is just a PIX, not a PIX 515 or 525) interface 0: ip address outside xxx.yyy.115.17 mask 255.255.255.240 interface 1: ip address inside 172.20.19.4 mask 255.255.255.0 global (outside) 1 xxx.yyy.115.14-xxx.yyy.115.14 global (outside) 1 xxx.yyy.115.7-xxx.yyy.115.13 static (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.172 172.20.18.172 0 255 static (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.190 172.20.21.241 0 255 conduit (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.172 25 tcp 172.20.18.172 255.255.255.255 conduit (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.172 110 tcp 172.20.18.172 255.255.255.255 conduit (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.190 80 tcp 172.20.21.241 255.255.255.255 alias (inside) 172.20.21.241 xxx.yyy.115.190 255.255.255.255 alias (inside) 172.20.18.210 xxx.yyy.115.174 255.255.255.255 alias (inside) 172.20.18.172 xxx.yyy.115.172 255.255.255.255 route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.yyy.115.18 1 route inside 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.20.19.3 1 route inside 172.21.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.20.19.3 1 route inside 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.20.19.3 1 route inside 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.20.19.3 1 *** * Robert T. Repko - R Squared Consultants |Voice: (610) 253-2849* * Serving the Computing World for 20 years | Fax: (610) 253-0725* * NT/UNIX/MAC Networking, Cisco Routers/Switches| Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Custom Programming| Address: 4 Juniper Ave.* * NJDOE Provider ID#: 763 | SPIN: 143010681 | Easton, PA 18045 * *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40722&t=40722 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need Clarification about Halabis BGP comment [7:40690]
I expect this comment relates more to IBGP where direct reachability is not the norm. At 06:55 PM 4/6/2002 -0500, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >At 01:10 PM 4/6/02, JohnZ wrote: > >"IP connectivity has to be achieved via a protocol different from BGP; > >otherwise, the session will be in a race condition. An example of a race > >condition follows: neighbors can reach one another via some IGP, the BGP > >session gets established, and the BGP updates get exchanged. > >This must be referring to external BGP peers that are not directly >connected and must rely on an IGP for connectivity? (EBGP multihop?) >Normally BGP peers are on a LAN or WAN and can reach each other directly, >simply with IP and TCP. I know that's not your question, but I thought it >was worth mentioning that the example is kind of a weird situation. > > > The IGP > >connection goes away for some reason, but still the BGP TCP session is up > >because neighbors can still reach each other via BGP. Eventually the session > >will go down because the BGP session cannot depend on BGP itself for > >neighbor reachability" > > > >Wouldn't the same condition occur if reachability is acheived via a > >different protocol. > >If the other protocol fails, yes. That's what he's saying. The race >condition occurs when BGP must rely on BGP for connectivity. This should >never happen. The routers can normally reach each other directly with >TCP/IP or via an IGP. But if the BGP protocol had been written such that >BGP depended on BGP, that's a race condition. It's also a race condition >when the other protocol fails and BGP is once again depending on BGP. > >I hope that makes sense. > >Priscilla > > >If the route becomes unreachable then BGP conectivity > >will still be lost.What's the advantage of making sure that "race condition" > >is avoided. > > > > > > > >Thanks. > > > >JZ > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40721&t=40690 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPP isdn problem [7:40723]
hi folks, I have ISDN BRI that is good working at 64 KBps, but when the second B channel is going up we got a problem. the problem is we can not reach PC's behind router but we can ping IP at interface router from router only. I have Checked all routing table is up and not any log that can inform what's the problem. Any of you can give me information what's the problem ? Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40723&t=40723 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Network Designer [7:40547]
My employer has had us using the NetformX tool for a couple of years now. ( this is the software of which apparently Cisco is using a subset for Cisco products only, according to what I saw on the web page ) So yes I use it daily in my work. As with any complex piece of software, there are good things and bad things. For most stuff, the configuration tool is OK. I have run into problems on particular pieces of equipment where the validation engine gets caught in a loop, not letting you install software, for example. This happens, but is rare enough that it does not become too much of an issue. I have found errors here and there with regards to pricing. Recently I discovered a bug which was duplicating a particular NM blade on 26xx and 36xx routers, and subsequent BOM's showed duplicate blades at two different prices. One can export designs into Visio, or into an HTML format that is actually pretty neat. It lacks subinterface support, for ATM or frame, so some of the connectivity validation tools don't work properly. Seems to be no vlan support, and configuring etherchannel links remain a mystery to me. As long as you understand that there are issues here and there, it can be quite a useful tool. Never trust it's pricing. HTH Chuck "Who is this Hemingway person at all?" "A guy that keeps saying the same thing over and over until you believe it must be good." "That must take a hell of a long time." Raymond Chandler, from Farewell, My Lovely, 1940 ""Richard Tufaro"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone ever use this? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40724&t=40547 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco PIX question, static, conduit, and alias [7:40722]
Conduit should be outside address of local machine (xxx.yyy.115.172) then port to be reached (25 tcp) then address and subnet mask of remote hosts wishing access. any = 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0. It could be a single address; but I'd expect to see a routable address. > -Original Message- > From: Robert T. Repko (R Squared Consultants) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 10:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco PIX question, static, conduit, and alias [7:40722] > > > I am having a problem getting to the inside Mail/Web servers from the > outside and I can't determine why. > > I'm replacing an old Cisco 7000 router with a new 7206 VXR. I'm also > reconfiguring the way their PIX was setup. The servers were > configured > with outside addresses (the PIX had a 'nat 0 xxx.yyy.115.0' > statement) > which made them vulnerable. I am moving them to an inside > address and > building a conduit from the outside to the inside. > > In order to leave their old network up and running while I > configured the > 7206VXR. I used my PIX 506 (Ver 5.x) for configuration > purposes. I had > everything configured and working. Then over the Easter holiday I > configured their PIX trying to use the same statements that I > had in my PIX > 506. This is where I ran into problems. Since they are > running such an > old version (Ver 4.1.4) of the IOS I could not use the same exact > commands. I'm not as familiar with the PIX 4.1.4 commands > and obviously > have something stated incorrectly. Below I have what I > believe to be the > pertinent information from both the 7206 and PIX. Can > someone tell me > where I went wrong. The xxx.yyy represent the same 2 octets > through out > both configs. Any help greatly appreciated. > > Cisco 7206 VXR > > interface FastEthernet0/1 > description ** Firewall Connection (inside area)** > ip address xxx.yyy.115.18 255.255.255.240 secondary > ip address 172.20.19.3 255.255.255.0 > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.yyy.253.129!(points > to the ISP) > ip route xxx.yyy.115.0 255.255.255.0 xxx.yyy.115.17 !(points > to the PIX) > > > Cisco PIX 4.1.4 (this is just a PIX, not a PIX 515 or 525) > > interface 0: ip address outside xxx.yyy.115.17 mask 255.255.255.240 > interface 1: ip address inside 172.20.19.4 mask 255.255.255.0 > > global (outside) 1 xxx.yyy.115.14-xxx.yyy.115.14 > global (outside) 1 xxx.yyy.115.7-xxx.yyy.115.13 > > static (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.172 172.20.18.172 0 255 > static (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.190 172.20.21.241 0 255 > > conduit (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.172 25 tcp 172.20.18.172 > 255.255.255.255 > conduit (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.172 110 tcp 172.20.18.172 > 255.255.255.255 > conduit (inside,outside) xxx.yyy.115.190 80 tcp 172.20.21.241 > 255.255.255.255 > > alias (inside) 172.20.21.241 xxx.yyy.115.190 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 172.20.18.210 xxx.yyy.115.174 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 172.20.18.172 xxx.yyy.115.172 255.255.255.255 > > route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.yyy.115.18 1 > route inside 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.20.19.3 1 > route inside 172.21.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.20.19.3 1 > route inside 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.20.19.3 1 > route inside 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.20.19.3 1 > > ** > * > * Robert T. Repko - R Squared Consultants |Voice: (610) > 253-2849* > * Serving the Computing World for 20 years | Fax: (610) > 253-0725* > * NT/UNIX/MAC Networking, Cisco Routers/Switches| Internet: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] * > * Custom Programming| Address: 4 Juniper > Ave.* > * NJDOE Provider ID#: 763 | SPIN: 143010681 | Easton, PA > 18045 * > ** > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40725&t=40722 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting the date on a 2900XL [7:39947]
Try this quick settings on global config:
("est" depending on your timezone location)
clock timezone est -5
clock summer-time est recurring
(Then point to an NTP public time server close to your timezone )
( Here are some public NTP servers
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/clock1.htm )
ntp server ip-address
This way your switch will sync and pick the right time.
Hope this helps
Jorge / CCNA CCNP / CCIE wanabe )
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://learncisco.n3.net
Phil Lorenz wrote:
> Any ideas on this one.
>
>
>
> I have a 2900XL and it's stuck in 1993. I see nothing beyond the set
> clock hh:mm:ss command.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Phil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40729&t=39947
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
