Re: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
In sniffer pro, I've had success by specifying two conditions joined by an OR statement for the filter. Each condition is specified by selecting the Data Pattern tab of the Define Filter dialog box and specifying appropriate offsets and data patterns. For the case where you need to specify the source ip address, I'd use an offset of 1A and fill in as many hex digits as it takes to uniquely define the subnet. For the case where you need to specify the destination ip address, I'd use an offset of 1E and fill in as many hex digits as it takes to uniquely define the subnet. Note: if you're looking at an existing capture featuring traffic to or from a specific host on the target subnet, you can use the data window in the same tab to speed things up slightly by selecting the line of the decode containing the address, clicking the set data button, and deleting the characters in the pattern window which distinguish the host from the subnet (generally, staring from the right: in the case of /24 masks, you'd eliminate the value in column 3, corresponding to the last octet/2 Hex digits). I don't remember the vendor-specific info for etherpeek, but the fundamentals are the same. HTH - Original Message - From: "supernet" To: Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:42 AM Subject: traffic analyzer [7:41267] > Hi Dear Friends, > > I have 1 branch office connected to main office by frame relay. I > noticed a lot of traffic across this link and would like to find out > what they are. The problem is I don't have access to the branch office, > therefore, everything has to be done in main office. I tried sniffer > pro, etherpeek and anasil but they only allow me to specify a particular > source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. Is there any other > software I can use? > > Thanks. > Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41275&t=41267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263]
Do you know what changed exactly? The PIX stuff seems to be a new addition; I don't remember studying any PIX info when I took the CCDA. Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Barkl Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263] Guess what? The DCN (CCDA) exam was updated today with new objectives without prior announcement or notification. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_ exams/640-441.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41276&t=41263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem to configure IS-IS [7:41138]
Hi, I think clns has to be enabled before enabling is-is.. Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall ." -- Nelson Mandela "Peter van Oene"To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax to: Sent by: Subject: Re: Problem to configure IS-IS [7:41138] nobody@groups tudy.com 11/04/2002 20:48 Please respond to "Peter van Oene" CLNS is not need for IS-IS routing for IP At 03:03 PM 4/11/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Did you enable CLNS routing? You need to turn this on before you can >configure ISIS. > >Anthony Pace > > >""nntp.groupstudy.com"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, Group, > > > > I am trying to configure IS-IS at CCIE lab, and two of my router did not > > allow > > me to get into the IS-IS router mode. I wonder if anyone can tell me what > > the > > problem is. See following router output: > > > > Thanks > > > > Ruihai > > > > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-DS-M), Version 12.1(13), RELEASE SOFTWARE > > (fc3) > > System image file is "flash:c2600-ds-mz.121-13.bin" > > > > cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x202) with 39936K/9216K bytes of > > memory > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41277&t=41138 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257]
Hi, Out of three power supplies two should be running all the time and one is used as a redundant. Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall ." -- Nelson Mandela "Jeffrey Reed"To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax to: Sent by: Subject: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257] nobody@groups tudy.com 12/04/2002 03:37 Please respond to "Jeffrey Reed" Im trying to understand power redundancy in the Cisco 4006 switch. Reading through the online information, Cisco seems to imply you must have at least two power supplies up and running at all times. The 3rd power supply provides redundancy. Other vendors allow you to run at least a partially populated chassis on one power supply. If I have a 4006 with SUPII and one 48-port blade, do I really need three power supplies? Anyone have experience with 4006s and power supplies? Thanks!! Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41278&t=41257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
Agreed. Ethereal beats Sniffer Pro, Etherpeek, or any other sniffer I've
used hands down. Best of all, it's free.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Ramsey
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
send a linux box configured with X/ethereal and vnc out there and remote
control it from your end!
-Patrick
>>> supernet 04/12/02 12:42AM >>>
Hi Dear Friends,
I have 1 branch office connected to main office by frame relay. I
noticed a lot of traffic across this link and would like to find out
what they are. The problem is I don't have access to the branch office,
therefore, everything has to be done in main office. I tried sniffer
pro, etherpeek and anasil but they only allow me to specify a particular
source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. Is there any other
software I can use?
Thanks.
Yoshi
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41279&t=41267
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
yeah...It's not hard to let "expert" spoil you though!
I've kinda grown accustom to letting sniffer pro do all the work for me... :)
>>> "Sean Knox" 04/12/02 04:22 AM >>>
Agreed. Ethereal beats Sniffer Pro, Etherpeek, or any other sniffer I've
used hands down. Best of all, it's free.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Ramsey
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
send a linux box configured with X/ethereal and vnc out there and remote
control it from your end!
-Patrick
>>> supernet 04/12/02 12:42AM >>>
Hi Dear Friends,
I have 1 branch office connected to main office by frame relay. I
noticed a lot of traffic across this link and would like to find out
what they are. The problem is I don't have access to the branch office,
therefore, everything has to be done in main office. I tried sniffer
pro, etherpeek and anasil but they only allow me to specify a particular
source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. Is there any other
software I can use?
Thanks.
Yoshi
> Confidentiality Disclaimer Confidentiality
Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41280&t=41267
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
now wait
if all he wants to do is sniff certain source and destination addresses,
this can be done using a filter... I prefer display filters just in case you
want to go back and change what you see rather than a capture filter.
Am I missing something?
>>> "Kevin Cullimore" 04/12/02 03:32 AM >>>
In sniffer pro, I've had success by specifying two conditions joined by an
OR statement for the filter.
Each condition is specified by selecting the Data Pattern tab of the Define
Filter dialog box and specifying appropriate offsets and data patterns.
For the case where you need to specify the source ip address, I'd use an
offset of 1A and fill in as many hex digits as it takes to uniquely define
the subnet.
For the case where you need to specify the destination ip address, I'd use
an offset of 1E and fill in as many hex digits as it takes to uniquely
define the subnet.
Note: if you're looking at an existing capture featuring traffic to or from
a specific host on the target subnet, you can use the data window in the
same tab to speed things up slightly by selecting the line of the decode
containing the address, clicking the set data button, and deleting the
characters in the pattern window which distinguish the host from the subnet
(generally, staring from the right: in the case of /24 masks, you'd
eliminate the value in column 3, corresponding to the last octet/2 Hex
digits).
I don't remember the vendor-specific info for etherpeek, but the
fundamentals are the same.
HTH
- Original Message -
From: "supernet"
To:
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:42 AM
Subject: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
> Hi Dear Friends,
>
> I have 1 branch office connected to main office by frame relay. I
noticed a lot of traffic across this link and would like to find out
> what they are. The problem is I don't have access to the branch office,
> therefore, everything has to be done in main office. I tried sniffer
> pro, etherpeek and anasil but they only allow me to specify a particular
> source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. Is there any other
> software I can use?
>
> Thanks.
> Yoshi
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41281&t=41267
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any good reference or homepage for learning Cisco TCL Script [7:41282]
please reply me [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have any good suggestion. THANKS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41282&t=41282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: any good reference or homepage for learning Cisco [7:41282]
Ranma, If you want to learn how to play the guitar, get yourself a guitar... www.cisco.com is the answer Dvass Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41283&t=41282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: syslog [7:41165]
> He's a question I've always was curious about: > > If you have your linux box/unix box set up for logging, but > you want to log > more than 7 devices with their own log file, how do you do it > if you only > have 6-7 facilities (local0-local7) to work with in the > syslog.conf file?!?! > > > all tips and tricks appreciated. First, if you use local0-local7, you have 8 devices available, so that might answer you question right away. Since that's most probably not the case: One approach is to use facilities to log for different types of devices. For example: local0 - switches local1 - routers local2 - firewalls local3 - ids local4 - load balancing devices ... This way you could have all the relevant information in separate files. Of course, you can take more important ones out from this and use specific facilities for them. If you approach the problem this way, 8 facilities is not that little. Another approach would, of course, be smarter syslog dfmon than the one that comes with most UNIX/Linux distributions. You could use thatto divert entries based on content adn/or source. Any hints in this regard would be welcome :-). Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41285&t=41165 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCDP [7:41071]
On Sep 1, 10:22am, "sam sneed" wrote: } ""Patrick Bass"" wrote: } > ""[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)"" wrote: } > > On Aug 31, 1:18pm, "Patrick Bass" wrote: } > > } } > > } To be a CCDP you need CCDA certification, CID exam plus Routing (or } > BSCI), } > > } Switching, and Remote Access (or you can just take Foundations exam } and } > > skip } > > } the Routing, Switching and Remote Access). } > > } } > > } Check out this URL for CCDP } > } http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccdp.h } > > } tml } > > } > > You had better go read that page again. It contains a box that } says: } > > } > > CCDP Prerequisites } > > Valid CCNA and CCDA certifications } > } > I'm sooo embarassed! :-) } } Don't be, this looks like its relatively new. I remember looking into CCDA } 6-9 months ago. You did not need CCNA to get CCDA back then. They were } totally seperate tracks.I'm sure of it. Time to read again... You don't need a CCNA to get a CCDA, but you do need it to get an CCDP. }-- End of excerpt from "sam sneed" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41286&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any good reference or homepage for learning Cisco TCL [7:41287]
Always, Always go to the source..WWW.CISCO.COM Take a look at the books published by CiscoPress ""Ranma"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > please reply me > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > if you have any good suggestion. > > THANKS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41287&t=41287 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257]
The 4006 comes standard with 2, you cannot get just 1. Don't try and run that 4006 full with blades on just 1 power supply... Also, if you are going to run the 4006 with inline power, you will need the additional AUX Power shelf with 3 more power supplies.. nothing like plugging in 6 power supplies. :) Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of x Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257] Jeff, We just bought a Cisco 4006 switch. Our reseller and our Cisco rep both told us we need two power supplies to run it and one for redundancy. They both went on to say the power supply is the first thing to go. They sold me on it so I got all three power supplies. I got the switch a few weeks ago and I threw in the two 10/100 blades and the extra power supply. I unplugged one power supply and it still seemed fine. I decide to unplug another and leave only one running just to see if it would die. It ran for 30 minutes until I decided to plug it back in, keep in mind I didn't have anything attached at the time. I am guessing if you really wanted to you could get away with one, but when your spending that much(think it was around $14k to $15k) an extra $600 or so to protect your investment is no big deal. I also like the fact that if two powersupplies die it will still probably run and I can take my time replacing them. A good night's sleep is worth $600 to me. --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: > Im trying to understand power redundancy in the > Cisco 4006 switch. Reading > through the online information, Cisco seems to imply > you must have at least > two power supplies up and running at all times. The > 3rd power supply > provides redundancy. Other vendors allow you to run > at least a partially > populated chassis on one power supply. If I have a > 4006 with SUPII and one > 48-port blade, do I really need three power > supplies? Anyone have experience > with 4006s and power supplies? > > Thanks!! > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > Cell 717-805-5536 > Office 717-737-8586 > FAX 717-737-0290 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41289&t=41257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257]
I believe that this link will explain everything about the Catalyst 4006 power system. It looks like you need at least 2 power supplies at minimum. We have been running a 4006 for 2 years with 2 power supplies. So far we haven't had any problems with them. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat4000/rel6_3/config/ad min.htm#xtocid1085919 -Original Message- From: x [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257] Jeff, We just bought a Cisco 4006 switch. Our reseller and our Cisco rep both told us we need two power supplies to run it and one for redundancy. They both went on to say the power supply is the first thing to go. They sold me on it so I got all three power supplies. I got the switch a few weeks ago and I threw in the two 10/100 blades and the extra power supply. I unplugged one power supply and it still seemed fine. I decide to unplug another and leave only one running just to see if it would die. It ran for 30 minutes until I decided to plug it back in, keep in mind I didn't have anything attached at the time. I am guessing if you really wanted to you could get away with one, but when your spending that much(think it was around $14k to $15k) an extra $600 or so to protect your investment is no big deal. I also like the fact that if two powersupplies die it will still probably run and I can take my time replacing them. A good night's sleep is worth $600 to me. --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: > Im trying to understand power redundancy in the > Cisco 4006 switch. Reading > through the online information, Cisco seems to imply > you must have at least > two power supplies up and running at all times. The > 3rd power supply > provides redundancy. Other vendors allow you to run > at least a partially > populated chassis on one power supply. If I have a > 4006 with SUPII and one > 48-port blade, do I really need three power > supplies? Anyone have experience > with 4006s and power supplies? > > Thanks!! > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > Cell 717-805-5536 > Office 717-737-8586 > FAX 717-737-0290 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41290&t=41257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: New Syslog... [7:41209]
Whats the Link? >>> "Tim Potier" 04/11 8:41 PM >>> Although I have not used the syslog function of this app, the 3com app is pretty cool too. Unfortunately, it only runs on Windows, but combines a FTP/TFTP server and client, as well as a syslog server. Not shabby..and free! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41291&t=41209 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
Patrick have you tried setting a data pattern??
That's what I did and it works a treat for only monitoring a given subnet.
Sam.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 12 April 2002 7:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
yeah...It's not hard to let "expert" spoil you though!
I've kinda grown accustom to letting sniffer pro do all the work for me... :)
>>> "Sean Knox" 04/12/02 04:22 AM >>>
Agreed. Ethereal beats Sniffer Pro, Etherpeek, or any other sniffer I've used
hands down. Best of all, it's free.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick
Ramsey
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
send a linux box configured with X/ethereal and vnc out there and remote
control it from your end!
-Patrick
>>> supernet 04/12/02 12:42AM >>>
Hi Dear Friends,
I have 1 branch office connected to main office by frame relay. I noticed a
lot of traffic across this link and would like to find out what they are. The
problem is I don't have access to the branch office, therefore, everything
has
to be done in main office. I tried sniffer pro, etherpeek and anasil but they
only allow me to specify a particular source IP, not the whole branch office
subnet. Is there any other software I can use?
Thanks.
Yoshi
> Confidentiality Disclaimer Confidentiality
Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or
proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc.
("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any
information
from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal
and/or
civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the
sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from
your
computer. Thank you.
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of Sam Deckert.vcf]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41292&t=41267
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disable Telnet [7:41293]
Hi All, How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want console access. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41293&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame-Relay Problem [7:41250]
I have already done all steps except the first one. Its a good point and I'll check that. It is possible that module doesn't support 64K clock(?) /N Sean Knox wrote: > Check the clock rate and cabling on both ends. If the clock rate specified > is different than what the module supports, then I believe the line will > come up and go back down. (For example, the WIC-2A/S cards only support a > maximum clock rate of 128K). > > * Check cabling (are the DCE and DTE ends correct?) > * Make sure frame-relay intf-type is set correctly on both ends (and cabling > is OK) > * Check clock rate (set on the interface) > * Issue a "no shut" on all frame-relay interfaces on both ends of the PVC. > > hth, > Sean > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > PING > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Frame-Relay Problem [7:41250] > > The question is that Caslow says on page-110 that if FR switching is > on, just enabling the encapsulation will bring up the PVC by using > inverse arp. I don't see that happening. > > /N > > "Engelhard M. Labiro" wrote: > > > Ping, > > > > Have you configure the following comands on FR switch ? > > 1. Global config mode : "frame-relay switching" > > 2. Interface config mode: "frame-relay intf-type dce" > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "PING" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:49 AM > > Subject: Frame-Relay Problem [7:41250] > > > > > If I have this simple net: > > > > > > 3660(FR Switch)---3640 > > > > > > I am using NM-4T on both routers. > > > Default (HDLC) encapsulation causes both router serial interfaces to > > > come up. I am trying inverse ARP from Caslow book but as > > > soon as I enable FR (or even PPP) encap, line goes down. 3660 is the DCE > > > > > > and supplying clock. > > > I am not sure if someone has tried NM-4T with FR? > > > > > > /N Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41294&t=41250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257]
I can add this.In the past year I have replaced 3 power supplies on 3 different 4006's. I would probably vote to have the extra one's in. HTH ms --- x wrote: > Jeff, > We just bought a Cisco 4006 switch. Our reseller > and > our Cisco rep both told us we need two power > supplies > to run it and one for redundancy. They both went on > to say the power supply is the first thing to go. > They sold me on it so I got all three power > supplies. > > I got the switch a few weeks ago and I threw in the > two 10/100 blades and the extra power supply. I > unplugged one power supply and it still seemed fine. > > I decide to unplug another and leave only one > running > just to see if it would die. It ran for 30 minutes > until I decided to plug it back in, keep in mind I > didn't have anything attached at the time. > > I am guessing if you really wanted to you could get > away with one, but when your spending that > much(think > it was around $14k to $15k) an extra $600 or so to > protect your investment is no big deal. I also like > the fact that if two powersupplies die it will still > probably run and I can take my time replacing them. > A > good night's sleep is worth $600 to me. > > > --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: > > Im trying to understand power redundancy in the > > Cisco 4006 switch. Reading > > through the online information, Cisco seems to > imply > > you must have at least > > two power supplies up and running at all times. > The > > 3rd power supply > > provides redundancy. Other vendors allow you to > run > > at least a partially > > populated chassis on one power supply. If I have a > > 4006 with SUPII and one > > 48-port blade, do I really need three power > > supplies? Anyone have experience > > with 4006s and power supplies? > > > > Thanks!! > > > > Jeffrey Reed > > Classic Networking, Inc. > > Cell 717-805-5536 > > Office 717-737-8586 > > FAX 717-737-0290 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41295&t=41257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
If you don't define a password on the VTY ports, that effectively disables telnet. (as you cannot telnet to a box that doesn't have a VTY password defined). Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41296&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
do a no login on line vty 0 4 ie: conf t line vty 0 4 no login -Original Message- From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293] Hi All, How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want console access. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41297&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any good reference or homepage for learning Cisco TCL [7:41298]
Many of the top hits have to do with IVR Auto-Attendant & other voice topics, instead of more traditional router functionality. I'm wondering, since this technology involves scripting rather than a primary piece of router functionality such as filtering, forwarding or routing, and the origins of the technology reside outside of ciso/other router vendors, if the user might not be well-served by searching unix sites/forums. Unless, of course, the functionality of the cisco implementation is limited to telephony applications. Does anyone know whether or not that is the case? - Original Message - From: "jb" To: Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:47 AM Subject: Re: any good reference or homepage for learning Cisco TCL [7:41287] > Always, Always go to the source..WWW.CISCO.COM > Take a look at the books published by CiscoPress > ""Ranma"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > please reply me > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > if you have any good suggestion. > > > > THANKS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41298&t=41298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
Hey Rich, Easiest way is probably: ! line vty 0 4 transport input none ! However, you might want to reserve telnet access to a private range for your own ease of admin in which case: ! line vty 0 4 transport input telnet access-class 2 in ! access-list 2 remark Secure Telnet Access access-list 2 permit 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 2 deny any log ! Cheers, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: 12 April 2002 14:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293] Hi All, How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want console access. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41299&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE lab test schedule [7:41300]
Does anyone know why there is no available lab test between June and September? Will the lab be closed for three months? Ruihai Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41300&t=41300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE lab test schedule [7:41300]
its booked full. you have to schedule way in advance. you can watch for people dropping lab dates on this list though -Original Message- From: Ruihai An [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE lab test schedule [7:41300] Does anyone know why there is no available lab test between June and September? Will the lab be closed for three months? Ruihai Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41302&t=41300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
Jeremy, If you enter "no login" under vty 0 4, then you'll get into the router! "login" means that the router prompts " Password:". "no login" instructs the router to bypass that, giving you access immediately. Dvass Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41301&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Set Channel_id? [7:41303]
Is there a way to set the channel_id number for port channels? I see a lot of commands reference the channel_id, but I dont see a way to configure the ID number. Thanks! Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41303&t=41303 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
Surely you were joking ""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > do a no login on line vty 0 4 ie: > > conf t > line vty 0 4 > no login > > -Original Message- > From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293] > > > Hi All, > > How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want > console access. > > > Thanks, > > > Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41304&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: New Syslog... [7:41209]
watch wrap
this wrap
that wrap
everywhere a wrap wrap
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=download+3cdaemon
>>> "Richard Tufaro" 04/12/02 08:49AM >>>
Whats the Link?
>>> "Tim Potier" 04/11 8:41 PM >>>
Although I have not used the syslog function of this app, the 3com app is
pretty cool too. Unfortunately, it only runs on Windows, but combines a
FTP/TFTP server and client, as well as a syslog server. Not shabby..and
free!
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41305&t=41209
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
hmmm
what would happen if you disable logins for vty 0 -4 but enabled it for 5?
could you start 4 sessions at the same time and login on the 5th? hm
>>> "Johnny Routing" 04/12/02 09:55AM >>>
Surely you were joking
""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> do a no login on line vty 0 4 ie:
>
> conf t
> line vty 0 4
> no login
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want
> console access.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Rich
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41306&t=41293
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
youre correct. i was answering too quick without thinking about it more. ive done it so many times but i havent had any caffeine this morning so i only process about half of my thoughts -Original Message- From: Dimitris Vassilopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] Jeremy, If you enter "no login" under vty 0 4, then you'll get into the router! "login" means that the router prompts " Password:". "no login" instructs the router to bypass that, giving you access immediately. Dvass Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41307&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
please insert foot into mouth now. im doing too much telnetting at once..if that is even a word :) -Original Message- From: Johnny Routing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Disable Telnet [7:41293] Surely you were joking ""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > do a no login on line vty 0 4 ie: > > conf t > line vty 0 4 > no login > > -Original Message- > From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293] > > > Hi All, > > How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want > console access. > > > Thanks, > > > Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41308&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acess level 15 - [7:41251]
Are you using the default username and password (admin/admin) >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: acess level 15 - [7:41251] >Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:59:06 -0400 > >HI, > >1. Getting an error while trying to use browser to configure vpn conc.3000 >series, - "access level 15". > >2.neiher thru telnet I am able to successfully login - except for console >port. > >Can any1 tell me where is the mistake i hv made >Thankx _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41309&t=41251 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is better? MLPP or load balancing with IOS [7:41249]
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:17:38PM -0400, Sayeed Mohammed wrote: Hello, I am planning to load balance 3 T1 lines going to same destination. I would like to know if somebody has implemented MLPPP for this purpose? Is it better than IOS load balancing? Cisco document says that MLPP is better but more CPU intensive. Please give your real life experience. Thanks. Sayeed Sayeed, When you say IOS load balancing, I assume you're talking about CEF Per-Packet load-balancing? If so, it's a fine choice if neither router is a GSR with an engine 2 line card. If there is a GSR with an engine 2 line card, then it won't support CEF per-packet load-balancing in any version prior to 12.0(21)S, and then it only does it at a severe performance loss. -- Regards, --phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41310&t=41249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
access-list 30 deny 0.0.0.0 line vty 0 4 access-class 30 in -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] youre correct. i was answering too quick without thinking about it more. ive done it so many times but i havent had any caffeine this morning so i only process about half of my thoughts -Original Message- From: Dimitris Vassilopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] Jeremy, If you enter "no login" under vty 0 4, then you'll get into the router! "login" means that the router prompts " Password:". "no login" instructs the router to bypass that, giving you access immediately. Dvass Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41311&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
Interesting thought and I think it would work that way, although I haven't
tried it. If you would start 4 sessions to utilize the first 4 lines, you
should be able to get in on the 5th. I might have to try this later this
afternoon ;)
JR
""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hmmm
>
> what would happen if you disable logins for vty 0 -4 but enabled it for 5?
> could you start 4 sessions at the same time and login on the 5th? hm
>
> >>> "Johnny Routing" 04/12/02 09:55AM >>>
> Surely you were joking
>
>
>
>
> ""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > do a no login on line vty 0 4 ie:
> >
> > conf t
> > line vty 0 4
> > no login
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want
> > console access.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > Rich
> > Confidentiality DisclaimerThis email and any files
transmitted with it may contain confidential and
> /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
> Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to
whom
> addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
> privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
> copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
> subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
> email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete
this
> email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41312&t=41293
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Practice WorkBook ECP-1. Any Comments. [7:41229]
Heh... I was wondering that too... or if they skipped that number because the possible connitations Anybody have any idea? Anyone know CCIE #? JR ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >Hey, I think I'll hold out for #! :-) > > > >Todd > > > Wonder if there's a CCIE #? > > > > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Manny Gonzalez" > >To: "Todd Carswell" > >Cc: "John Mistichelli" ; "Chris Hugo" > >; > >Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:12 AM > >Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Practice WorkBook ECP-1. Any Comments. > > > > > >> Todd, shoot for 4 numbers dude. You don't want a "zip code" do you? :-) > >> > >> Although CCIE# 1 would be neat! > >> _ > >> Manny Gonzalez ... CCIE# 9013 > >> Sr. Network Analyst . NY Presbyterian > >> _ > >> > >> > >> Todd Carswell wrote: > >> > > >> > Chris, > >> > > >> > Mentor went out of business, but Caslow and his boys started their own > >> > company! Check them out at www.netmasterclass.net > >> > > >> > Their classes are now called NMC-1 and NMC-2. I just attended NMC-1 > and > >I > >> > was really pleased. I'm certain that it will go a long way towards > >getting > >> > me those coveted 4 (or 5) numbers. > >> > > > > > Take care. > >> > > >> > Todd Carswell > >> > > > > > Disclaimer: I do NOT work for Bruce Caslow or netmasterclass. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41313&t=41229 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DLSW direct encapsulation confusion-->for Experts only [7:41315]
With DLSW over frame relay, you can use direct encapsulation (frame map dlsw, with pass thru), or DLSW Lite (frame map llc, no pass thru). On the lab I'm sure they would make it clear which one they wanted and if not... ask the proctor. Here's a link which explains it pretty well. JR http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls3_rg.htm ""IT Guy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > GUys, > > A bit confuse abt DLSW+ direct encapsulation. I read on CD that > it can be configure via 2 ways > > (1) DLSW LITe > (2) PASSTHRU > > but I can see that in books dlsw lite is treated as another encapsulation > type and not the direct encapsulation.. > > SO If we follow the CD and lets consider that we have 2 kinds of Direct > encapsulation, what we should configure in exam if they ask as to do so?? > > I knw the difference of Local acknoledgment..Is there any other criteria to > check which option we should configure. > > Thkx for help.. > > > TOM > > > > _ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41315&t=41315 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257]
I tried runing on one power supply and it is still up but this is what you are going to see: 2002 Apr 12 06:30:48 %SYS-2-PS_INSUFFICIENT:Insufficient power supplies operatin g, this system requires 2 and only has 1 2002 Apr 12 06:30:48 %SYS-2-PS_NFANFAIL:Power supply 2 and power supply fan fail ed Dave Tim O'Brien wrote: > > The 4006 comes standard with 2, you cannot get just 1. Don't try and run > that 4006 full with blades on just 1 power supply... Also, if you are going > to run the 4006 with inline power, you will need the additional AUX Power > shelf with 3 more power supplies.. nothing like plugging in 6 power > supplies. :) > > Tim > CCIE 9015 > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of x > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257] > > Jeff, > We just bought a Cisco 4006 switch. Our reseller and > our Cisco rep both told us we need two power supplies > to run it and one for redundancy. They both went on > to say the power supply is the first thing to go. > They sold me on it so I got all three power supplies. > > I got the switch a few weeks ago and I threw in the > two 10/100 blades and the extra power supply. I > unplugged one power supply and it still seemed fine. > I decide to unplug another and leave only one running > just to see if it would die. It ran for 30 minutes > until I decided to plug it back in, keep in mind I > didn't have anything attached at the time. > > I am guessing if you really wanted to you could get > away with one, but when your spending that much(think > it was around $14k to $15k) an extra $600 or so to > protect your investment is no big deal. I also like > the fact that if two powersupplies die it will still > probably run and I can take my time replacing them. A > good night's sleep is worth $600 to me. > > --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: > > Im trying to understand power redundancy in the > > Cisco 4006 switch. Reading > > through the online information, Cisco seems to imply > > you must have at least > > two power supplies up and running at all times. The > > 3rd power supply > > provides redundancy. Other vendors allow you to run > > at least a partially > > populated chassis on one power supply. If I have a > > 4006 with SUPII and one > > 48-port blade, do I really need three power > > supplies? Anyone have experience > > with 4006s and power supplies? > > > > Thanks!! > > > > Jeffrey Reed > > Classic Networking, Inc. > > Cell 717-805-5536 > > Office 717-737-8586 > > FAX 717-737-0290 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41314&t=41257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
static route description [7:41317]
i know this has come up before, and i even think i answered it but i cant find it in the archives. how do you put a description on a static route? Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41317&t=41317 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
if you didn't set the passwrd for telnet login,router will be refused to login by default - Original Message - From: "John Allhiser" To: Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:20 PM Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] > access-list 30 deny 0.0.0.0 > line vty 0 4 > access-class 30 in > > -Original Message- > From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] > > > youre correct. i was answering too quick without thinking about it more. ive > done it so many times but i havent had any caffeine this morning so i only > process about half of my thoughts > > -Original Message- > From: Dimitris Vassilopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] > > > Jeremy, > > If you enter "no login" under vty 0 4, then you'll get into > the router! > > "login" means that the router prompts " Password:". > "no login" instructs the router to bypass that, giving > you access immediately. > > Dvass Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41316&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41318]
Haaa.Can I re-write the job post...Pllaasss Client is seeking a highly seasoned CCIE with 5+ years of ISP/Large Enterprise experience who has done years of project management and can tie a neck-tie. Candidate must be currently un-employed, have no plans of becoming employed in the next year, and must be willing to work for %50 of his market worth. Candidate should enjoy getting jerked around at a moments notice and despise the thought of reward for work well done. Heck yeah...Sign me up (And maybe afterwards, you can take turns stabbing me in the eye with a kabob skewer!) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mlh Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41253] Do you really think you can find a CCIE who is designed for your strict requirement? I don't think so. - Original Message - From: "Jeff Glaser" To: Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:10 PM Subject: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [3:4413] > Following is a new request that is very thin re details for competitive > reasons, but really hot. > > The client is seeking a PT (approximately 1 week a month) CCIE or near CCIE > who has worked extensively with CISCO 7000, CISCO 12000 and GSR in a > variety of situations and for multiple clients, who can be available and > travel one week a month, conduct assessments, write recommendations, etc. > The client will use this consultant, if they meet the criteria and satisfy > the end clients, about 6-12 times over the next 12 months. Therefore > communication skills, consulting skills, maturity, etc. mean something. > PLEASE understand that this is part-time, on an as-needed basis. It could > lead to full time--but given this market, that is a wish rather than a > guarantee. > > THIS IS NOT an entry level position AND IT IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR INDEPENDENT > CONSULTANTS (1099 or CORP-CORP) who are either US Citizens, Green Card > Holders or TN VISA holders. No agencies or third party > > RATE IS CRITICAL--If yu think you can bill yourself at BIG 4( sorry > Andersen) rates, then please save us both a lot of trouble.and don't send in > the reusme. > > > Send resume, contact information and billing rate (travel will be billed > separately) to me ASAP. > > Thanks. > > Jeff > > > Sincerely, > > Jeffrey Glaser > NewGen Technologies, Inc. > 703-729-3382 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41318&t=41318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263]
I took the old exam a couple of years ago so I don't remember exactly what was on the exam. I plan to take the new exam soon and provide feedback. -Original Message- From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:57 AM To: 'Andy Barkl'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263] Do you know what changed exactly? The PIX stuff seems to be a new addition; I don't remember studying any PIX info when I took the CCDA. Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Barkl Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263] Guess what? The DCN (CCDA) exam was updated today with new objectives without prior announcement or notification. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_ exams/640-441.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41319&t=41263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257]
I agree, all of mine will run off one power supply although I would NEVER advise that. I would worry more about the sup going out. In 4 4006's I have had 3 fail. Never a poer supply and we have three in each. Regards. -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257] I tried runing on one power supply and it is still up but this is what you are going to see: 2002 Apr 12 06:30:48 %SYS-2-PS_INSUFFICIENT:Insufficient power supplies operatin g, this system requires 2 and only has 1 2002 Apr 12 06:30:48 %SYS-2-PS_NFANFAIL:Power supply 2 and power supply fan fail ed Dave Tim O'Brien wrote: > > The 4006 comes standard with 2, you cannot get just 1. Don't try and run > that 4006 full with blades on just 1 power supply... Also, if you are going > to run the 4006 with inline power, you will need the additional AUX Power > shelf with 3 more power supplies.. nothing like plugging in 6 power > supplies. :) > > Tim > CCIE 9015 > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of x > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257] > > Jeff, > We just bought a Cisco 4006 switch. Our reseller and > our Cisco rep both told us we need two power supplies > to run it and one for redundancy. They both went on > to say the power supply is the first thing to go. > They sold me on it so I got all three power supplies. > > I got the switch a few weeks ago and I threw in the > two 10/100 blades and the extra power supply. I > unplugged one power supply and it still seemed fine. > I decide to unplug another and leave only one running > just to see if it would die. It ran for 30 minutes > until I decided to plug it back in, keep in mind I > didn't have anything attached at the time. > > I am guessing if you really wanted to you could get > away with one, but when your spending that much(think > it was around $14k to $15k) an extra $600 or so to > protect your investment is no big deal. I also like > the fact that if two powersupplies die it will still > probably run and I can take my time replacing them. A > good night's sleep is worth $600 to me. > > --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: > > Im trying to understand power redundancy in the > > Cisco 4006 switch. Reading > > through the online information, Cisco seems to imply > > you must have at least > > two power supplies up and running at all times. The > > 3rd power supply > > provides redundancy. Other vendors allow you to run > > at least a partially > > populated chassis on one power supply. If I have a > > 4006 with SUPII and one > > 48-port blade, do I really need three power > > supplies? Anyone have experience > > with 4006s and power supplies? > > > > Thanks!! > > > > Jeffrey Reed > > Classic Networking, Inc. > > Cell 717-805-5536 > > Office 717-737-8586 > > FAX 717-737-0290 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41334&t=41257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dialer profile vs. rotary group? [7:41271]
Legacy Dial One Physical w/Dial Rotary Groups Multiple Physical Interfaces, One dialer Interface Dialer Pools Multiple Physical Interfaces, Multiple Dialer Interface Dialer pool expands on the rotary concept by allowing a physical interface to belong to multiple pools, the dialer interface can then reference the pool of physical interfaces or multiple pools. Philip -Original Message- From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dialer profile vs. rotary group? [7:41271] Hey all, I am confused by the difference(s) between dialer profiles and rotary groups. All the text I've read seems rather convoluted - physical interfaces can only be in one rotary group but can exist in many different dialer pools (if using dialer profiles)? Is that the main difference? Rotary groups seem to be an outdated configuration solution. Someone please point me in the right direction... Sean Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41335&t=41271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Market Place [7:41336]
Do you have to be a Cisco reseller to order directly from Cisco Market Place? In the Networking Products Market Place homepage, when I use the Internet Commerce Agreement Link (ICA), it asks me to select a region; then get the message: "Your Cisco.com user profile does not contain the necessary Internet Commerce information to sign the Internet Commerce Agreement for your company." Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41336&t=41336 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aironet access point 340 [7:41339]
Wondering where i can find links to where i can configure the access point through the console with command line? George Gittins Internet Systems Manager Weslaco, Tx 78599 Phone (956)9696557 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41339&t=41339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Set Channel_id? [7:41303]
Something like this on a router: int fa0/1 channel-group 24 int fa0/2 channel-group 24 int port-channel 24 ip add 10.1.1.1 http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/inte r_c/icdlanin.htm#xtocid1703911 On the 4000 and 6000 series it can be done like this: set port channel 1/1-2 35 set port channel 2/1-2,3/1-2,4/1-2,5/1-2 164 David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Jeffrey Reed > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Set Channel_id? [7:41303] > > > Is there a way to set the channel_id number for port channels? I see a lot > of commands reference the channel_id, but I dont see a way to > configure the > ID number. > > Thanks! > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > Cell 717-805-5536 > Office 717-737-8586 > FAX 717-737-0290 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41341&t=41303 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41342]
Maybe they'll find a CCIE who has gotten so rich on past achievements, that working 1 week a month just to keep current sounds appealing? The snide comment about big 4 would turn me off, though (if I were such a person ;-) Priscilla At 10:55 AM 4/12/02, Kelly Cobean wrote: >Haaa.Can I re-write the job post...Pllaasss > >Client is seeking a highly seasoned CCIE with 5+ years of ISP/Large >Enterprise experience who has done years of project management and can tie a >neck-tie. Candidate must be currently un-employed, have no plans of >becoming employed in the next year, and must be willing to work for %50 of >his market worth. Candidate should enjoy getting jerked around at a moments >notice and despise the thought of reward for work well done. > >Heck yeah...Sign me up (And maybe afterwards, you can take turns >stabbing me in the eye with a kabob skewer!) > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >mlh >Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:08 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) >[7:41253] > > >Do you really think you can find a CCIE who is designed for your strict >requirement? I don't think so. > >- Original Message - >From: "Jeff Glaser" >To: >Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:10 PM >Subject: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [3:4413] > > > > Following is a new request that is very thin re details for competitive > > reasons, but really hot. > > > > The client is seeking a PT (approximately 1 week a month) CCIE or near >CCIE > > who has worked extensively with CISCO 7000, CISCO 12000 and GSR in a > > variety of situations and for multiple clients, who can be available and > > travel one week a month, conduct assessments, write recommendations, etc. > > The client will use this consultant, if they meet the criteria and satisfy > > the end clients, about 6-12 times over the next 12 months. Therefore > > communication skills, consulting skills, maturity, etc. mean something. > > PLEASE understand that this is part-time, on an as-needed basis. It could > > lead to full time--but given this market, that is a wish rather than a > > guarantee. > > > > THIS IS NOT an entry level position AND IT IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR INDEPENDENT > > CONSULTANTS (1099 or CORP-CORP) who are either US Citizens, Green Card > > Holders or TN VISA holders. No agencies or third party > > > > RATE IS CRITICAL--If yu think you can bill yourself at BIG 4( sorry > > Andersen) rates, then please save us both a lot of trouble.and don't send >in > > the reusme. > > > > > > Send resume, contact information and billing rate (travel will be billed > > separately) to me ASAP. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Jeff > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Jeffrey Glaser > > NewGen Technologies, Inc. > > 703-729-3382 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41342&t=41342 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traffic analyzer [7:41343]
While we're off-topic (somewhat) - What are people doing for non-Ethernet traffic analysis? I'm specifically interested in T1 and V.35 interfaces I've used Sniffers for this in the past with quite a bit of success however given the current state of the economy, etc. my current client is interested in seeing what their options are in this area. Obvously in the Ethernet Market there's Ethereal, Etherpeek, Network Instruments, etc. My preference would be to have the same interface (assuming it would be GUI...) regardless of the network technology being analyzed. I've been spoiled by the "distributed sniffer" product for remote sniffing and am looking for similar functionality. Thanks for the input. Ben - Original Message - From: "supernet" To: Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:42 AM Subject: traffic analyzer [7:41267] > Hi Dear Friends, > > I have 1 branch office connected to main office by frame relay. I noticed a lot of traffic across this link and would like to find out > what they are. The problem is I don't have access to the branch office, > therefore, everything has to be done in main office. I tried sniffer > pro, etherpeek and anasil but they only allow me to specify a particular > source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. Is there any other > software I can use? > > Thanks. > Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41343&t=41343 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE lab test schedule [7:41300]
> Does anyone know why there is no available lab test between June and > September? Will the lab be closed for three months? > Ruihai I was curious about that too. I just scheduled mine and ended up in October. -chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41344&t=41300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41346]
There is no doubt in my mind that Jeff is a good guy, and he's certainly just doing his job like the rest of us. I was more poking fun at the clients requirements. In fact, I see that Jeff is in my area, so you never know, he and I might cross paths some day. I certainly wouldn't want to burn a bridge with a guy who might someday help to keep me employed! I just had to have a little fun with something that seemed to be so outrageously unreasonable. Incidentally, though, this brings up a good question for all of you "already-CCIE's" out there...How many of you travel on a regular basis as part of your job, and how much of your time is spent "on the road." I ask because I'm fully prepared that my "no travel" lifestyle will change once I go seeking the really fun jobs as a CCIE. My family won't like it too much, but I'm sure we'll all adjust. Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE, MCP+I Network Engineer GRC International, Inc., an AT&T company -Original Message- From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:20 PM To: Kelly Cobean Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41318] Jeff's a good guy. He's just working within the constraints of his client's (unrealistic) criteria. As I was first reading the post, I was thinking "This doesn't sound bad. This is exactly what my company does." THEN I got to the paragraph about rate. If I couldn't bill at least $225/hr plus all expenses paid, I wouldn't consider the gig. However, I know that there are a lot of talented people out there who aren't working at the moment. So here's the question to anyone in the group who's got the skillset required: With the overhead of operating on a 1099 basis and the uncertainty of how many hours this client is going to throw your way in a year, how many of you would do this for under $200/hr? 150/hr? 100/hr? heaven forbid$50/hr? Inquiring minds want to know. Craig At 10:55 AM 4/12/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Haaa.Can I re-write the job post...Pllaasss > >Client is seeking a highly seasoned CCIE with 5+ years of ISP/Large >Enterprise experience who has done years of project management and can tie a >neck-tie. Candidate must be currently un-employed, have no plans of >becoming employed in the next year, and must be willing to work for %50 of >his market worth. Candidate should enjoy getting jerked around at a moments >notice and despise the thought of reward for work well done. > >Heck yeah...Sign me up (And maybe afterwards, you can take turns >stabbing me in the eye with a kabob skewer!) > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >mlh >Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:08 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) >[7:41253] > > >Do you really think you can find a CCIE who is designed for your strict >requirement? I don't think so. > >- Original Message - >From: "Jeff Glaser" >To: >Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:10 PM >Subject: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [3:4413] > > > > Following is a new request that is very thin re details for competitive > > reasons, but really hot. > > > > The client is seeking a PT (approximately 1 week a month) CCIE or near >CCIE > > who has worked extensively with CISCO 7000, CISCO 12000 and GSR in a > > variety of situations and for multiple clients, who can be available and > > travel one week a month, conduct assessments, write recommendations, etc. > > The client will use this consultant, if they meet the criteria and satisfy > > the end clients, about 6-12 times over the next 12 months. Therefore > > communication skills, consulting skills, maturity, etc. mean something. > > PLEASE understand that this is part-time, on an as-needed basis. It could > > lead to full time--but given this market, that is a wish rather than a > > guarantee. > > > > THIS IS NOT an entry level position AND IT IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR INDEPENDENT > > CONSULTANTS (1099 or CORP-CORP) who are either US Citizens, Green Card > > Holders or TN VISA holders. No agencies or third party > > > > RATE IS CRITICAL--If yu think you can bill yourself at BIG 4( sorry > > Andersen) rates, then please save us both a lot of trouble.and don't send >in > > the reusme. > > > > > > Send resume, contact information and billing rate (travel will be billed > > separately) to me ASAP. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Jeff > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Jeffrey Glaser > > NewGen Technologies, Inc. > > 703-729-3382 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41346&t=41346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report miscond
Re: Cisco Memory [7:41266]
I buy most of my memories and Flash from Anthon , look it up at www.anthonypanda.com , he provides good service as well . -- Navin Parwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] ""The Edward Groove"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Has anyone done any research on cheaper, yet compatible memory for the > 2500 series routers? I'm looking for some cheap flash and DRAM for this > line. Does anyone have any specs--or even better--manufacturer model > names that you've tested that works? > > Thanks, in advance... > > Eddie > > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41347&t=41266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sorry about the three post - server trouble [7:41323]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Memory [7:41266]
Hi Eddie, go to http://www.memoryx.net, memory there for a fraction of the official Cisco stuff. I bought DRAM for my 1600 and 2500 there, works perfectly well. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41332&t=41266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dialer profile vs. rotary group? [7:41271]
The "interface dialer " command defines a dialer rotary group. The "dialer rotary-group " command includes an interface in a dialer rotary group. (page 235 Cisco BCRAN) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41329&t=41271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
supernet wrote: > > but they only allow me to specify a particular > source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. Why's that? Sniffer Pro will let you define entire ranges of source/destination IPs in the filter. In Sniffer Pro, when you define the filter, simply put 192.168.1.* (where 192.168.1.0 is the subnet and * is the wildcard). Works for me =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41331&t=41267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263]
I looked at the site, but do not see any indication that it changed... what am I missing? I also looked at the retired exam page: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/endoflife.htm Last one changed/retired was CCNA. Please let me know where I went wrong. I am taking this exam Monday, so I would like to be aware of any changes! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41333&t=41263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
Do not configure VTY and that's all , you are making it story. Duh Ismail Al-shelh -Original Message- From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293] Hi All, How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want console access. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41348&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for a 3660 Chassis and Power Supply [7:41349]
Hello All: Apologize if this is the wrong forum. But I am looking to purchase a Cisco 3660 chassis with the power supply. I already have the motherboard, flash, and DRAM. If anyone can help, I would appreciate it. Thanks. Kenneth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41349&t=41349 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dialer profile vs. rotary group? [7:41271]
Yes, I'm aware of what the commands are. However, my question asked for further distinction between dialer profiles and rotary groups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Williams Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Dialer profile vs. rotary group? [7:41271] The "interface dialer " command defines a dialer rotary group. The "dialer rotary-group " command includes an interface in a dialer rotary group. (page 235 Cisco BCRAN) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41350&t=41271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: aironet access point 340 [7:41339]
Hi George, did a search on CCO and found: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo_350/accsspts/ap350scg/ap350ch2.htm#39026 Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41351&t=41339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
